1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the Higher Education Opportunity Act 2008 – Part I...
-
Upload
mackenzie-hurst -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the Higher Education Opportunity Act 2008 – Part I...
1
Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the Higher Education
Opportunity Act 2008 – Part I
Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice PresidentBarbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President
Debra G. Klinman – Vice PresidentMSCHE 2010 Annual Conference
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1
2
Overview • Part I
– Context and History– HEOA 2008 Accreditation Provisions Implemented
July 1, 2010
• Part II– Substantive Change– HEOA 2008 Accreditation Provisions to be
Implemented July 1, 2011
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2
3
Context and History
• Accreditation developed and evolved to promote mission-centered, continuous quality improvement through peer evaluation.
• HEA 1965 (with subsequent re-authorizations, including 2008) named accreditors as gatekeepers for institutional access to federal funding. Various regulations have ensued.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3
4
Context and History
• Today, while accreditors continue to focus on quality improvement, USDE sees the primary purpose of accreditation as safeguarding federal funds.
• How can Middle States work with our member institutions to reconcile these perspectives?
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 4
5
July 1, 2010 Provisions
• Distance Education• Transfer of Credit Policy• Student Achievement• Teach-out Plans• Additional Accreditation Provisions
– Direct Assessment – Due Process Procedures– Responsibility to report Title IV fraud
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 5
6
Distance Education
• Distance Education– Instruction delivered via technology– Regular student/faculty interaction
• Correspondence Education– Instructional materials delivered, mail or email– Student initiated interaction as needed
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 6
7
Distance Education Programs
• MSCHE-approved Distance Education Programs– 50 percent or more of the program’s credits are
approved for electronic delivery – Approved via Substantive Change process – Listed on Statement of Accreditation Status– Designated reviewer added to evaluation teams– New distance education guidelines from MSCHE
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 7
8
Student Identity Verification Policy
• Applies to Distance and Correspondence Education Courses and Programs
• Institutions document their processes through which student identity is verified– Secure username and password– Proctored exams – New technologies – Protection of student privacy– Notification of student fees at registration
• Evaluators review complianceMiddle States Commission on Higher Education 8
9
Transfer of Credit Policy
• Publicly Disclosed Policy – Students and the public
• Identify Criteria for Transfer Decisions• List Articulation Agreements• Institution’s certify compliance when
submitting Self Study and PRR materials• Evaluators review compliance
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 9
10
Student Achievement
• “Success with respect to student achievement in relation to the institution's mission, which may include different standards for different institutions or programs, as established by the institution, including, as appropriate, consideration of– State licensing examinations, – course completion, and– job placement rates.”
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 10
11
Student Achievement in MSCHE Standards
• Standard 14 – Assessment of program, general education, & institutional
learning goals, including direct evidence of student learning
• Standard 11 – Educational offerings conducted at levels of appropriate
rigor for the programs or degrees offered
• Standard 8 – Ongoing assessment of student success including retention
through the pursuit of the student’s educational goals
Middle States Commission on Higher Education
12
Teach-out Plan
“…means a written plan developed by an institution that provides for the equitable treatment of students if an institution, or an institutional location that provides 100% of at least one program, ceases to operate before all students have completed their programs of study, and may include, if required by the institution’s accrediting agency, a teach-out agreement between institutions.”
Middle States Commission on Higher Education
13
Teach-Out Plans• Accreditors evaluate and approve plans if:
– USDE notifies MSCHE that a teach-out plan is required following an action against the institution
– MSCHE withdraws, terminates, or suspends an institution’s accreditation
– An institution notifies MSCHE that it intends to cease operations entirely or close a location that provides 100% of at least one program
– A State agency notifies MSCHE that an institution’s license has been or will be revoked
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 13
14
Teach-out Plans
• Accreditors look for– Equitable treatment of students– Notification to students of additional charges, if
any• If a program is accredited by another
accrediting agency, MSCHE notifies that agency of its approval of the teach-out plan
• MSCHE may require a teach-out agreement as part of the institution’s teach-out plan
Middle States Commission on Higher Education
15
Questions?
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 15
16
Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the Higher Education
Opportunity Act 2008 – Part II
Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice PresidentBarbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President
Debra G. Klinman – Vice PresidentMSCHE 2010 Annual Conference
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 16
17
Recap & Overview • Part I
– Context and History– HEOA 2008 Accreditation Provisions Implemented
July 1, 2010
• Part II– Substantive Change– HEOA 2008 Accreditation Provisions to be
Implemented July 1, 2011
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 17
18
Substantive Change Overview
• Definition of Substantive Change
• Prior Approval for Changes Required
• Relationship between Regional Accreditors and US Department of Education
Middle States Commission on Higher Education
19
Substantive Change Categories• Change in mission or objectives• Change of legal status, control, or ownership• Courses or programs representing a significant
departure from existing offerings• Programs at a new degree or credential level• Change from clock to credit hours• Substantial increase or decrease in the number
of clock or credit hours awarded for successful completion of a program
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 19
20
Substantive Change Categories• Initiation or expansion of distance or
correspondence education wherein 50% or more credits in a program offered through alternative delivery
• Establishment of a branch campus • Establishment of domestic and international
additional locations, including an additional location acquired from another institution, or established to provide a teach-out for students
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 20
21
Substantive Change Categories
• Planned closure or relocation of additional location or branch campus, or a change in category
• Institutional closure requiring a teach-out plan• Initiation of contractual agreement with 25%
or more of an educational program provided by an unaccredited entity
Middle States Commission on Higher Education
22
July 1, 2011 Provisions
• State authorization • Misrepresentation• Incentive compensation• Gainful employment (in progress) • Credit hours
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 22
23
State Authorization
• States must authorize Title IV eligibility
• Accreditation may serve as proxy
• States must act on complaints
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 23
24
Misrepresentation
• Institutions and their representatives must NOT make “false or misleading” statements to:– Students/prospective students– Public– Accreditors– State– USDE
• Includes marketing, advertising, recruiting, admissions
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 24
25
Incentive Compensation
• No incentives to anyone based on securing enrollments or awarding financial aid
• Includes recruiters, admissions staff, presidents, athletic staff
• No “safe harbors”
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 25
26
Gainful Employment (in progress*)
“educational program that prepares students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation”
• New programs – USDE notification/approval– Need and wage analysis– How developed– Accreditation and State
approval
• Disclose information on website, including– Graduation rates– Placement rates– Median loan debt
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 26
*Eligibility for student aid – Final regulations in progress, to be implemented July 1, 2012
27
Credit Hours
• Unit of measurement of academic work• Federal definition consistent with Carnegie
Unit• “reasonable equivalencies” -- verifiable
student learning outcomes• Accreditors evaluate reliability & accuracy• Accreditors must address deficiencies,
report “systematic noncompliance” to USDEMiddle States Commission on Higher Education 27
28
HEOA 2008 ResourcesUS Dept of Education
http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ope/policy.htmlhttp://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/leg/hea08/index.html
Council for Higher Education Accreditation
http://www.chea.org/Government/index.asp#FedUpdate
Middle States Commission on Higher Education
http://www.msche.org/
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 28
29
Questions?
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 29