1

IDT Open Seminar

ALAN TURING AND HIS LEGACY100 Years Turing

celebration

Gordana Dodig Crnkovic, Computer Science and Network Department

Mälardalen UniversityMarch 8th 2012

http://www.mrtc.mdh.se/~gdc/work/TuringCentenary.pdf

http://www.mrtc.mdh.se/~gdc/work/TuringMachine.pdf

2

*aFinite Automata

Push-down Automatannba Rww

nnn cba ww

**ba

Turing Machines

Chomsky Language Hyerarchy

TURING MACHINES

“Turing’s "Machines". These machines are humans who calculate.” (Wittgenstein)

“A man provided with paper, pencil, and rubber, and subject to strict discipline, is in effect a universal machine.” (Turing)

3

4

............Tape

Read-Write headControl Unit

Turing Machine

5

............

Read-Write head

No boundaries -- infinite length

The head moves Left or Right

The Tape

6

............

Read-Write head

1. Reads a symbol2. Writes a symbol3. Moves Left or Right

The head at each time step:

7

Head starts at the leftmost positionof the input string

............

Blank symbol

head

a b ca

Input string

The Input String

#####

8

Determinism

1q

2qRba ,

Allowed Not Allowed

3qLdb ,

1q

2qRba ,

3qLda ,

No lambda transitions allowed in TM!

Turing Machines are deterministic

9

Determinism

Note the difference between state indeterminismwhen not even possible future states are known in advance.

and choice indeterminismwhen possible future states are known,but we do not know which state will be taken.

10

Halting

The machine halts if there are no possible transitions to follow

11

Example

............ a b ca

1q

1q

2qRba ,

3qLdb ,

No possible transition

HALT!

# # # # #

12

Final States

1q 2q Allowed

1q 2q Not Allowed

• Final states have no outgoing transitions• In a final state the machine halts

13

Acceptance

Accept Input If machine halts in a final state

Reject Input

If machine halts in a non-final state or If machine enters an infinite loop

14

Formal Definitions for

Turing Machines

15

Transition Function

1q 2qRba ,

),,(),( 21 Rbqaq

16

1q 2qLdc ,

),,(),( 21 Ldqcq

Transition Function

17

Turing Machine

),#,,,,,( 0 FqQM

Transitionfunction

Initialstate

blank

Finalstates

States

Inputalphabet

Tapealphabet

18

For any Turing Machine M

}:{)( 210 xqxwqwML f

Initial state Final state

The Accepted Language

19

Standard Turing Machine

• Deterministic

• Infinite tape in both directions

•Tape is the input/output file

The machine we described is the standard:

20

Computing Functionswith

Turing Machines

21

)(0 wfqwq f

Initial Configuration

FinalConfiguration

Dw DomainFor all

A function is computable ifthere is a Turing Machine such that

fM

22

Example (Addition)

The function yxyxf ),( is computable

Turing Machine:

Input string: yx0 unary

Output string: 0xy unary

yx, are integers

23

Start

Finish 0

fq

11

yx

11

final state

0

0q

1 11 1

x y

1

initial state

# #

# #

24

0q 1q 2q 3qL,## L,01

L,11

R,##

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

Turing machine for function yxyxf ),(

25

Execution Example:

11x

11y

Time 0

0

0q

1 11 1x y

Final Result

0

4q

1 11 1yx

(2)

(2)

# #

# #

26

Time 0 0

0q

1 11 1

0q 1q 2q 3qL,01

L,11

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

# #

L,##

R,##

yxyxf ),(

27

0q

01 11 1Time 1

0q 1q 2q 3qL,01

L,11

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

# #

L,##

R,##

yxyxf ),(

28

0

0q

1 11 1Time 2

0q 1q 2q 3qL,01

L,11

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

# #

L,##

R,##

yxyxf ),(

29

1q

1 11 11Time 3

0q 1q 2q 3qL,01

L,11

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

# #

L,##

R,##

yxyxf ),(

30

1q

1 11 11Time 4

0q 1q 2q 3qL,01

L,11

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

# #

L,##

R,##

yxyxf ),(

31

1q

1 11 11Time 5

0q 1q 2q 3qL,01

L,11

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

# #

L,##

R,##

yxyxf ),(

32

2q

1 11 11Time 6

0q 1q 2q 3qL,01

L,11

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

# #

L,##

R,##

yxyxf ),(

33

3q

1 11 01Time 7

0q 1q 2q 3qL,01

L,11

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

# #

L,##

R,##

yxyxf ),(

34

3q

1 11 01Time 8

0q 1q 2q 3qL,01

L,11

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

# #

L,##

R,##

yxyxf ),(

35

3q

1 11 01Time 9

0q 1q 2q 3qL,01

L,11

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

# #

L,##

R,##

yxyxf ),(

36

3q

1 11 01Time 10

0q 1q 2q 3qL,01

L,11

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

# #

L,##

R,##

yxyxf ),(

37

3q

1 11 01Time 11

0q 1q 2q 3qL,01

L,11

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

# #

L,##

R,##

yxyxf ),(

38

4q

1 11 01

0q 1q 2q 3qL,01

L,11

R,10

R,11

4q

R,11

HALT & accept

Time 12 # #

L,##

R,##

yxyxf ),(

39

Universal Turing Machine

40

A limitation of Turing Machines:

Turing Machines are “hardwired”

they executeonly one program

41

Solution: Universal Turing Machine

• Reprogrammable machine

• Simulates any other Turing Machine

Characteristics:

42

Universal Turing Machine

simulates any other Turing Machine M

Input to Universal Turing Machine:

• Description of transitions ofM• Initial tape contents of M

43

Universal Turing Machine

Description of Three tapes

MTape Contents of

Tape 2

State of M

Tape 3

M

Tape 1

44

We describe Turing machine as a string of symbols:

We encode as a string of symbols

M

M

Description of M

Tape 1

45

Alphabet Encoding

Symbols: a b c d

Encoding: 1 11 111 1111

46

State Encoding

States: 1q 2q 3q 4q

Encoding: 1 11 111 1111

Head Move Encoding

Move:

Encoding:

L R

1 11

47

Transition Encoding

Transition: ),,(),( 21 Lbqaq

Encoding: 10110110101

separator

48

Machine Encoding

Transitions:

),,(),( 21 Lbqaq

Encoding:

10110110101

),,(),( 32 Rcqbq

110111011110101100

separator

49

Tape 1 contents of Universal Turing Machine:

encoding of the simulated machine as a binary string of 0’s and 1’s

M

50

As Turing Machine is described with a binary string of 0’s and 1’s

the set of Turing machines forms a language:

Each string of the language isthe binary encoding of a Turing Machine.

51

Language of Turing Machines

L = { 010100101,

00100100101111,

111010011110010101, …… }

(Turing Machine 1)

(Turing Machine 2)

……

52

Question:Do Turing machines have the same power with a digital computer?

Intuitive answer: Yes

There was no formal proof of Church-Turing thesis until 2008!

CHURCH TURING THESIS

53

Dershowitz, N. and Gurevich, Y. A Natural Axiomatization of Computability and Proof of Church's Thesis, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, v. 14, No. 3, pp. 299-350 (2008)

This formal proof of Church-Turing thesis relies on an axiomatization of computation that excludes randomness, parallelism and quantum computing and thus corresponds to the idea of computing that Church and Turing had.

54

Turing’s thesis

Any computation carried outby algorithmic meanscan be performed by a Turing Machine. (1930)

http://www.engr.uconn.edu/~dqg/papers/myth.pdf The Origins of the Turing Thesis Myth Goldin & Wegner