Urban Political Machines Immigration Urbanization Industrialization Expanded Democracy.
1 How the other half lives: Urbanization and Land Markets in a Global Perspective Robin Rajack Urban...
-
Upload
esther-crawford -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of 1 How the other half lives: Urbanization and Land Markets in a Global Perspective Robin Rajack Urban...
1
How the other half lives: Urbanization and Land Markets in
a Global Perspective
Robin Rajack
Urban Anchor(Finance, Economics and Urban
Development DepartmentWorld Bank)
Nov 19th 2007
2
Overview
I. Urbanisation and Land Consumption
II. Evolution in the Bank’s Urban Land and Shelter Portfolio
III. Land as the Binding Constraint on Urban Shelter Affordability
IV. Emerging Lessons and Future Research
V. Land Policy Dialogues – are we speaking the same language?
3
I. Urbanisation and Land Consumption
4
Urban Growth Management Initiative (UGMI)– a global representative sample of 120 cities
Regions Population
Size Class Income (annual per
Classcapita GNP)
East Asia & the Pacific Europe Latin America & the Caribbean Northern Africa Other Developed Countries South & Central Asia Southeast Asia Sub-Saharan Africa Western Asia
Source: Sheppard, 2007
100,000 to 528,000528,000 to 1,490,0001,490,000 and 4,180,000> 4,180,001
< $3,000 $3,000 - $5,200 $5,200 - $17,000 > $17,000
Source: Sheppard 2007
5
Expansion of Accra, Ghana: 1985-2000
Source: The Dynamics of Global Expansion. World Bank 2005.
6
Source: The Dynamics of Global Expansion. World Bank 2005.
7
Source: The Dynamics of Global Expansion. World Bank 2005.
8
Global Urban ExpansionBuilt-up areas are increasing in developing country cities
and could triple by 2030
Built-Up Area Projections, 2000-2030 (by Region)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
N.Amer. Europe LAC Africa Asia Ind Dev
Region
Are
a ('
000
Sq
.Km
.)
2000
2030
Source: The Dynamics of Global Expansion. World Bank 2005.
9
Hypotheses Tested/Supported
Hypothesis Description
1.Strongly confirmed – doubling population increases urban land cover by 44 to 77 percent.
2.Strongly Confirmed – doubling national income increases urban land use by 46 to 52 percent
3.Confirmed – doubling fuel cost decreases urban land use by 8 to 15 percent
4.Strongly confirmed – doubling the value added per hectare in agriculture decreases urban land use by 17 to 23 percent
5.Confirmed – increased accessibility to global markets increases urban land use– increasing the number of direct international flights increases urban land use by 6 to 16 percent,
0x
L
0x
y
0x
t
0x
w
0A
x
r
• The data produce estimates that are consistent with our hypotheses
Source: Sheppard 2007, UGMI
10
Use models to determine “excess” urban land use
Use models to predict required new urban land per year
Using history between T1 and T2 as a guide, we can determine the required amount of land to make available for new urban development
Policy Implications
Source: Sheppard 2007, UGMI
11
Demand for housing services is growing
More than 2/3 of new households in developing countries cannot access the formal housing market.
Approximately 1 billion people are living in slums (as defined by UN-HABITAT).
As urban population doubles between 2000 and 2030, land consumption by cities is projected to triple.
12
A tale of two continents: Urbanisation in Latin America and
Africa
Latin America and the Caribbean• Urbanized continent: 77% in 2005
and 81% in 2020; 25% of inhabitants live in Informal housing.
• Slums exist in all capitals and large cities.
• Poverty and exclusion associated with residence.
Sub-Saharan Africa• Urbanizing rapidly: 35% in 2005 to
63% in 2020.• Only 10% of city populations have
access to formal housing.• Harsh conditions: no access roads,
no water, no sanitation, no solid waste pick up, overcrowding, lack of community facilities.
• Inexistent land management; obsolete land registration.
Slums and poor housing conditions bringHigh child mortality; greater violence and crime; persistent discrimination in income and employment.
Source: FEU, 2007
13
II. Evolution in the Bank’s Urban Land and Shelter Portfolio
14
What have we done?
Evolution of focus 1970-80s: Focus on urban upgrading and sites and
services (together comprised about 75% of portfolio) 1990s-00s: Shift to policy-based lending and housing
finance (together comprised 60% of portfolio)
Lending Portfolio In the last 30 years: $16 billion for shelter; over 180
projects in over 80 countries Ratings/performance: over 80% satisfactory
Source: FEU, 2007
15
Composition of Shelter Lending, 1997-2005
Over $8.5Billion (in 2001 dollars) approved since FY97 in over 90 projects
Slum Upgrading13%
Sites and Services17%
Housing Policy19%
Housing Finance31%
Disaster Relief20%
Slum Upgrading
Sites and Services
Housing Policy
Housing Finance
Disaster Relief
Source: Thirty Years of World Bank Shelter Lending. World Bank 2006.
16
Urban land Interventions per say…
• Sites and Services, Land Development for Relocation
• Tenure Regularisation as part of Upgrading or post-conflict/ post-disaster assistance
• Regulatory Audits, associated studies and Capacity Building
• Town Planning and Capacity Building
• Mapping/GIS/Addressage
17
III. Land as the Binding Constraint on Shelter Affordability
18
Review of 30 Years of Shelter Lending
• While ancillary markets are a factor, Land is the binding constraint to shelter affordability
• Land Market Constraints particularly acute:A. RegulationB. Public Land ManagementC. Tenure
19
Source: Dunkerley, 1983
20
(A)REGULATION
• Zoning
• Plot Sizes
• Floor Area Ratio/ Floor Space Index
• Development Rights
• Legislation e.g. Urban Land Ceiling Act, India
21
Impact of Plot Size Regulation – Ethiopia (Source: Bertaud 2004)
22
Impact of Floor Area Ratio Regulation in Mumbai
(source Bertaud and Brueckner (2005)).
23
(B) PUBLIC LAND MANAGEMENT
• assertion that many developing country cities are characterized by substantial public land assets which are sub-optimally managed, leading to land supply constraints and price distortions.
– Garba and Al-Mubaiyedh (1999)
– Deininger - PRR (2003)
– Buckley and Kalarickal (2006)
24
Direct Intervention: 4 ways public land management may affect land market
outcomes
• (i) withholding of land from the market;
• (ii) high transactions costs;
• (iii) limited functional decentralization; and
• (iv) unfair competition with private sector developers
25
Conclusions of Public Land Review• tentative positive relationships between less dominant public sector
involvement in land development activity and better land market outcomes.
• This result was supported by other findings that better and more conservative public land management practices (limited or no land banking; auctioning of land; and patrol of sites to detect encroachment) as well as decentralization are also correlated with better land market outcomes.
• These correlations were observed for indicators of affordability, encroachment and access and not for the indicator of spatial form.
• this is potentially important and suggests that significant direct participation by the State to address land market deficiencies on average may not yield better land market outcomes for the poor.
Source: Rajack, 2007
26
Results: House Price to Income Index
Variable Log of GDP PPP
Log of total Population
Extent of Public Land
Extent of Public Dominance of Land Development
Public Land Index 3
Public Land Index 4
N R2 and Adj R2
House Price to Income Ratio (2005)
0.84 0.39 0.28 3.08* -1.62* 0.63 34 0.330.19
Source: Rajack, 2007
27
Results: Shelter Price Inflation 2000-2005
Variable Log of GDP PPP
Log of total Population
Extent of Public Land
Extent of Public Dominance of Land Development
Public Land Index 3
Public Land Index 4
N R2 and Adj R2
Estimated Shelter Price Inflation 2000-2005
-0.17 0.12 0.28 0.45 -0.61*** -0.05 41 0.260.14
Source: Rajack, 2007
28
Results: Proportion of Firms Citing Access to Land as a Major Constraint
Variable Log of GDP PPP
Log of total Population
Extent of Public Land
Extent of Public Dominance of Land Dev.
Contiguity Index
Public Land Index 5
N R2 and Adj R2
% of Firms Citing Land Access as a Major Constraint
-4.22* -0.28 4.26 7.71* -8.19 -1.28 36 0.330.18
Source: Rajack, 2007
29
Results: Proportion of Firms Citing Access to Land as a Major Constraint
Variable Log of GDP PPP
Log of total Population
Extent of Public Land
Extent of Public Dominance of Land Dev.
Contiguity Index
Public Land Index 5
N R2 and Adj R2
% of Firms Citing Land Access as a Major Constraint
-4.22* -0.28 4.26 7.71* -8.19 -1.28 36 0.330.18
Source: Rajack, 2007
30
(C)TENURE
• Absence of Secure Tenure is one of the key amenities used in the UN-HABITAT definition of slums
• Wide array of emerging ways of consolidating informal tenure
• Street Addressage – a cost-effective starting point
31
Land Tenure Security matters to Urban Operations because:
• It affects the ease and price at which often high value land can be alienated to different uses and users
• It is a fundamental ingredient in the process of connecting growing urban populations with housing finance which is rapidly expanding in several parts of the world e.g. India, China, Europe
• It is an important ingredient in ensuring that target populations can choose to remain the beneficiaries of subsidised infrastructure in Upgrading Programs
• Access to housing assistance in reconstruction programs usually requires proof of a ‘regular’ claim to land because the asset to be built is spatially fixed
32
IV. Emerging Lessons and Future Research
33
What have we learnt?
REGULATION: We now appreciate that the economic costs of inappropriate regulation of land markets including impacts on land prices and welfare costs to the urban poor can be very substantial.
PUBLIC LAND: The hands-off ‘enabling approach’ that the international community has advised and supported has not resulted in meaningful progress in meeting the land supply needs of the urban poor.
TENURE: Improving land tenure security for the urban poor can be achieved through less conventional and less costly approaches than formal land titling. We now have better understanding of the potential benefits and limitations of improving land tenure security.
34
Priority Areas for Research
REGULATION: Research on the implications of various land market distortions on urban welfare/ quality of life, particularly for the poor; and consequences of these distortions on the efficacy of donor/ government interventions
PUBLIC LAND: Research on elements of good practice for public land management in relation to infrastructure provisions, land readjustment/ redevelopment, urban sprawl control, and slum policy.
TENURE: Research on the implications of the continuum of property claims/ rights and associated formalization strategies that exist in developing country cities and access to credit, municipal infrastructure and public services.
35
Land Studies in the Urban Anchor
• Expanding land access through less conventional policy instruments
• Governance and urban land management
• Land management and natural hazards
• Public land management and land market outcomes
• Stocktaking of Urban Land Portfolio: FY96-FY06
• Strengthening Citizenship through Slum Upgrading
• Land Policy Dialogues: Urban and Rural Synergies
36
What are the challenges?
Data deficiency remains a major challenge to effectively addressing land market issues.
Corruption in land markets is a serious threat especially in emerging markets.
The biggest threat to policy success in the future is a public policy and governance framework that is too slow or too captured to respond to the rapid demographic growth that is occurring.
37
V. Land Policy Dialogues –
Are we speaking the same language?
38
Cross-sectoral linkages
• Land conversion in the peri-urban areas
• Land Policy impact on food security issues
• Land use planning, zoning regulations, land readjustment
• Compensation for the land acquisition
• Institutional integration for land administration
• Political economy concerns
• Development priorities
39
Lessons learnt
• Dialogues are not as Divergent as initially thought but some of the big picture being missed
• Link between Balanced Dialogues and Balanced Projects is weaker
• Team mixture normally occurs at the Peer review level rather than core team composition
• Some encouraging examples of cross-sectoral team and project composition – e.g. Albania