1 GNSS-R concept extended by a fine orbit tuning Jaroslav KLOKOČNÍK a, Aleš BEZDĚK a, Jan...
-
Upload
suzanna-haynes -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 GNSS-R concept extended by a fine orbit tuning Jaroslav KLOKOČNÍK a, Aleš BEZDĚK a, Jan...
1
GNSS-R concept GNSS-R concept extended by a fine orbit tuningextended by a fine orbit tuning
Jaroslav KLOKOČNÍKJaroslav KLOKOČNÍK a a, Aleš BEZDĚK , Aleš BEZDĚK aa, Jan KOSTELECKÝ, Jan KOSTELECKÝ b,cb,c
a a Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-251 65 Ondřejov, Czech Republic, Tel .:+420323620158,CZ-251 65 Ondřejov, Czech Republic, Tel .:+420323620158,
[email protected]@asu.cas.cz, , [email protected],[email protected],b b CEDR – Research Institute for Geodesy, Topography and Cartography, CEDR – Research Institute for Geodesy, Topography and Cartography,
CZ-250 66 Zdiby, Czech RepublicCZ-250 66 Zdiby, Czech Republic, , c c Department of Advanced Geodesy, Czech Technical University, Department of Advanced Geodesy, Czech Technical University,
CZ-166 29 Praha 6, Thákurova 7,Czech RepublicCZ-166 29 Praha 6, Thákurova 7,Czech Republic , , [email protected]@fsv.cvut.cz
22ndnd CNES CCT workshop on passive reflectometry using radiocom space signals, CNES CCT workshop on passive reflectometry using radiocom space signals, Space Reflecto2011, Calais, France 27 and 28 Oct 2011Space Reflecto2011, Calais, France 27 and 28 Oct 2011
2
OutlineOutline
DefinitionsOrbit tuning for altimetry mission ERS 1, DGFI 1989GRACE and GOCE Inspiration for GNSS-RExamples for GNSS-R, second satellite Instead of ConclusionReferences
3
Definitions
4
Orbital resonancesOrbital resonances
Orbital resonance β/α takes place, if: Groundtracks are exactly the same after
β nodal revolutions and α nodal days Equivalent names: repeat orbit, resonant orbit
Density of ground tracks at equator
D = o/β,
where the circumference
o = 40 075 km (for the Earth)
Number of single-satellite crossover points (among the ascending and descending tracks)
where u = 1 for I < 90 and
u = –1 for I > 90 deg
(see, e.g., Farless 1986 or Kim 1997).
1 uN x
5
mean motion vs semi-major axes, 1mean motion vs semi-major axes, 1stst order analytical theory order analytical theory
Recalling the exact resonance β:α; the phase in LPE at the exact resonance becomes . The relevant satellite mean motion n:
(1)
Now we have to put the LPEs for the orbital elements Ω, ω, and M0 into (1); we get:
where the minus sign is valid for the normal rotation and the plus sign for the retrograde rotation of the planet. Finally we arrive at
(2)
where for and for , the former case for the normal rotation, the latter for the retrograde rotation. Note that
0MSn
,,cos2
3
2
3cos61
22
2
a
RzIIzJSn
0
1coscos4
2
31 2
2
2 IIa
RJSn
202 5 CJ 0S 1 0S 1
Klokočník, J., Kostelecký, J., and Gooding, R. H., “On fine orbit selection for particular geodetic and oceanographic missions involving passage through resonances”, Journal of
Geodesy, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2003, pp. 30–40. doi: 10.1007/s00190-002-0276-3
6
Historical notes - altimetry and GRACE
7
History: orbit tuning for altimetry missions: oceanography vs space geodesy
8
D = 932 km
9
D = 80 km
10
future
11
Motivation to study resonance regimes for freely decaying GRACE:
dramatic changes in the accuracy of monthly solutions for variations of
the geopotential near low-order resonances
(here the case of 61/4 in Autumn 2004):
Courtesy of S. Bettadpur (2004, 2006, priv. commun.) Note logarithmic scales on the y-axes.
12
GOCE
(pre)-selected orbits with high-order resonances
for measuring phases with the onboard gradiometer,
orbit keeping by means of the ion motor to ± 5m
13
14
D=2505 km
D=41 km
15
GNSS-RGNSS-R
small demonstration satellite piggybacked to another satellite to sun-synchronous, retrograde, dawn-dusk (SSO) orbit (6 am and 6 pm are times of equator crossings)
at height 500–800 km.
Later the operational satellite again on SSO orbit
but at height 1300–1500 km
both orbits sun-synchronous, I = 98–101 deg,
revisit time about 3 days for the former and about 2 days for the latter mission.
Swath is 900 km or 1500 km, respectively, spatial resolution not worse than 10×100 kmxkm
16
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
15:1
29:2
43:3
44:3
46:3
57:4
59:4
61:4
71:5
72:5
73:5
74:5
76:5
repeat period (nodal days)
altit
ude
(SM
A –
637
8.1
km)
17
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60650
655
660
665
670
675
680
44:3
103:7
117:8
147:10
161:11
191:13
205:14
235:16
249:17
250:17
278:19
279:19
293:20
323:22
337:23
338:23
353:24
366:25
367:25
381:26
395:27
397:27
411:28
425:29
426:29
439:30
454:31
455:31
456:31
469:32
485:33
499:34
512:35
513:35
514:35
527:36
529:36
542:37
543:37
544:37
557:38
559:38
571:39
587:40
600:41
601:41
602:41
603:41
617:42
629:43
630:43
631:43
632:43
645:44
647:44
659:45
661:45
662:45
673:46
675:46
688:47
689:47
690:47
691:47
703:48
717:49
718:49
719:49
720:49
733:50
746:51
749:51
761:52
763:52
765:52
776:53
777:53
778:53
779:53
791:54
793:54
806:55
807:55
808:55
809:55
821:56
823:56
835:57
838:57
849:58
851:58
853:58
863:59
864:59
865:59
866:59
867:59
868:59
881:60
repeat period (nodal days)
altit
ude
(SM
A –
637
8.1
km)
18
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60750
755
760
765
770
775
780
43:3
72:5
115:8
158:11
187:13
201:14
244:17
259:18
273:19
287:20
302:21
330:23
331:23
358:25
359:25
373:26
388:27
389:27
401:28
403:28
416:29
417:29
431:30
444:31
445:31
446:31
459:32
461:32
475:33
487:34
489:34
502:35
503:35
517:36
530:37
531:37
532:37
533:37
545:38
547:38
560:39
573:40
588:41
589:41
590:41
605:42
616:43
617:43
618:43
619:43
631:44
633:44
646:45
647:45
659:46
661:46
673:47
674:47
675:47
676:47
677:47
689:48
691:48
702:49
703:49
704:49
705:49
706:49
717:50
719:50
733:51
734:51
745:52
747:52
749:52
759:53
760:53
761:53
762:53
763:53
775:54
788:55
789:55
791:55
803:56
818:57
820:57
821:57
831:58
833:58
835:58
845:59
846:59
847:59
848:59
849:59
850:59
863:60
repeat period (nodal days)
altit
ude
(SM
A –
637
8.1
km)
19
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 601250
1300
1350
1400
1450
1500
1550
13:1
25:2
37:3
38:3
51:4
62:5
63:5
64:5
repeat period (nodal days)
altit
ude
(SM
A –
637
8.1
km)
20
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 601440
1445
1450
1455
1460
1465
1470
25:2
138:11
163:13
188:15
213:17
238:19
262:21
263:21
287:23
288:23
301:24
312:25
313:25
337:27
338:27
351:28
362:29
363:29
387:31
388:31
401:32
412:33
413:33
437:35
438:35
439:35
451:36
462:37
463:37
464:37
487:39
488:39
501:40
512:41
513:41
514:41
537:43
538:43
539:43
549:44
551:44
562:45
563:45
577:46
587:47
588:47
589:47
599:48
601:48
612:49
613:49
614:49
627:50
637:51
638:51
649:52
651:52
662:53
663:53
664:53
665:53
677:54
687:55
688:55
689:55
699:56
701:56
712:57
713:57
715:57
727:58
737:59
738:59
739:59
740:59
749:60
751:60
repeat period (nodal days)
altit
ude
(SM
A –
637
8.1
km)
21
Example of possible orbit tuning for GNSS-R satelliteExample of possible orbit tuning for GNSS-R satellite
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
780
782
784
786
788
790
792
794
796
798
800
100
(790.8)
143
(786.1)
157
(795.1)
186
(783.5)
214
(797.2)
229
(781.9)
243
(788.0)
257
(793.5)
271
(798.3)
272
(780.8)315
(780.0)
328
(799.1)
329
(784.6)
343
(788.8)
357
(792.7)
371
(796.3)
385
(799.6)
386
(787.3)
414
(794.1)
415
(782.6)
443
(789.3)
457
(792.3)
472
(785.1)
485
(797.8)
501
(781.3)
515
(784.2)
528
(796.0)
529
(787.0)
543
(789.6)
557
(792.0)
571
(794.4)
585
(796.6)
586
(788.5)
587
(780.4)
599
(798.8)
601
(782.9)
614
(793.0)
615
(785.3)
629
(787.6)
643
(789.8)
644
(782.4)
657
(791.8)
671
(793.9)
672
(786.8)
685
(795.8)
699
(797.6)
701
(784.0)
713
(799.4)
728
(794.5)
730
(781.5)
743
(789.9)
756
(798.0)
757
(791.7)
758
(785.4)
773
(781.1)
786
(789.1)
787
(783.0)
799
(796.8)
801
(784.9)
814
(792.5)
815
(786.6)
827
(799.8)
829
(788.4)
842
(795.7)
843
(790.0)
844
(784.4)
857
(791.6)
859
(780.5)
870
(798.6)
871
(793.2)
872
(787.7)
873
(782.2)
885
(794.7)
887
(783.9)
899
(796.1)
901
(785.5)
902
(780.3)
913
(797.5)
915
(787.1)
927
(798.9)
928
(793.7)
929
(788.6)
943
(790.1)
956
(796.5)
957
(791.5)
958
(786.6)
959
(781.6)
971
(792.9)
973
(783.1)
985
(794.3)
986
(789.4)
999
(795.6)
1013
(796.8)
1014
(792.2)
1015
(787.5)
1016
(782.8)
1027
(798.1)
1041
(799.3)
1042
(794.7)
1043
(790.2)
1044
(785.6)
1045
(781.1)
1057
(791.5)
1059
(782.5)
1072
(788.3)
1073
(783.8)
1085
(793.9)
1087
(785.2)
1098
(799.5)
1101
(786.5)
1102
(782.2)
1115
(787.8)
1127
(797.4)
1128
(793.2)
1129
(789.0)
1130
(784.8)
1131
(780.6)
1141
(798.6)
1143
(790.2)
1156
(795.5)
1157
(791.4)
1159
(783.2)
1171
(792.6)
1173
(784.4)
1184
(797.7)
1185
(793.7)
1186
(789.7)
1187
(785.7)
1188
(781.7)
1199
(794.8)
1201
(786.9)
1212
(799.8)
1213
(795.9)
1214
(791.9)
1216
(784.1)
1217
(780.2)
1227
(796.9)
1229
(789.2)
1231
(781.4)
1241
(797.9)
1243
(790.3)
1244
(786.4)
1255
(798.9)
1257
(791.4)
1259
(783.8)
1269
(799.9)
1270
(796.2)
1271
(792.4)
1272
(788.7)
1273
(784.9)
1274
(781.2)
1298
(798.1)
1299
(794.5)
1301
(787.2)
1313
(795.5)
1315
(788.2)
1317
(781.0)
1327
(796.4)
1328
(792.9)
1330
(785.7)
1331
(782.1)
1341
(797.4)
1343
(790.3)
1345
(783.2)
1356
(794.8)
1357
(791.3)
1358
(787.8)
1359
(784.3)
1369
(799.2)
1373
(785.4)
1384
(796.7)
1385
(793.3)
1386
(789.8)
1387
(786.4)
1388
(783.0)
1399
(794.2)
1401
(787.4)
1403
(780.6)
1412
(798.5)
1414
(791.8)
1415
(788.4)
1417
(781.7)
1427
(796.0)
1429
(789.4)
1431
(782.7)
Orbital resonances of a satellite of Earth (i=98.5 deg)
repeat period (nodal days)
altit
ude
(SM
A –
637
8.1
km)
22
243/17 872/61
h=788.0 km, D = 165 km h=787.7 km, D = 46 km
23
Table 1. Density of the ground tracks and number of the cross-over points for different repeat orbits
D = o/β,
u = 1 for I < 90 and u = –1 for I > 90 deg
1 uN x
24
25
The Fine Orbit Tuning for (the second) ESA’s GNSS-R satellite The Fine Orbit Tuning for (the second) ESA’s GNSS-R satellite
Step 1 standard orbit selection (already done by ESA)
SSO orbits 500–800 km and 1300–1500 km,
I = 98–101 deg,
Step 2 suggestion for possible fine orbit tuning (done now & here)
Step 3 the definitive, more specific orbit selection (by ESA),
to be aware of possibility of the fine orbit tuning
Step 4 definitive fine orbit tuning for the final orbit selection
26
Case of GOCE we are ready to repeat something like that for any satellite
27Orbits with no syubcycles, orbits with subcycles, the basic difference…
28
GOCE groundtrack pattern animation for a hypothetical free fall
29
actual61-day orbit
planned 61-day orbit
20/21-day subcycles
41-day subcycle
62-day orbit
30
Temporal evolution of an orbit Temporal evolution of an orbit – – withwith//without a subcyclewithout a subcycle
Repeat orbit with no subcycles→ gradually filling up two large equatorial gaps
Repeat orbit with a subcycle→ groundtracks laid down in two (or more) almost homogeneous grids
31
AnalytiAnalytical vs. numerical modellingcal vs. numerical modelling
So far, graphs based on simple theory with only the zonal term J2 (flattening of Earth)
What happens when all other orbital perturbations (geopotential, lunisolar, tides, radiation, …) are added?
Peaks in histograms widened Repeat character is keptEarth coverage graphs almost the same
(0.02° ↔ 2 km)
32
Orbits near the actual Orbits near the actual 61-day orbit of GOCE61-day orbit of GOCE
Equator with groundtracks after 65 days Different mean altitudes
Repeat orbits: 61-day (selected for MOP1) 41-day subcycle
62-day orbit compared with 61-dayhas more regular groundtrack grid is only by 200 m higher
62
62
41
41
61
61
6162
4141
33
Proposal for tProposal for the he 145-day orbit with 62 or 83145-day orbit with 62 or 83 day subcyclesday subcycles
Planned 2327:145 repeat orbit node spacing ≈ 17.2 km
Nearest repeat orbits 62-day, lower by 30 m 83-day, higher by 23 m
Ion thruster performance ±50 m
145-day repeat is a good choice → node spacing at least
40.3 km for 62-day repeat30.1 km for 83-day repeat
Resonant orbits ordered by height
D R h (km)
1653 103 255,062
995 62 255,105
2327 145 255,135
1332 83 255,158
1669 104 255,19
2006 125 255,211
2343 146 255,226
83145
62
34
Instead of ConclusionInstead of Conclusion
Analyses done for GRACE and GOCE
can be repeated for GNSS-R satellite(s).
Number of measuring points (nadir and off-nadir) for a bistatic altimetry
with the fine orbit tuning
may increase by 1-2 orders,
in comparison with
the number of monostatic (nadir) altimetry (sub-satellite) points
in a “general” orbit (ignoring any fine orbit tuning).
Additional costs for the inclusion of the fine orbit tuning and orbit keeping
are theoretically zero.
35
Thank you for your attentionThank you for your attention
36
More information: [email protected] www.asu.cas.cz/~jklokocn, ~bezdek
References
Klokocnik et al. 2003: On Fine Orbit Selection for Particular Geodetic and Oceanographic Missions Involving Passage Through Resonances,J. GEOD., Vol. 77, No. 1, 30–40, doi:10.1007/s00190-002-0276-3
Wagner et al. 2006: Degradation of Geopotential Recovery from Short Repeat-Cycle Orbits: Application to GRACE Monthly Fields, J. GEOD.,Vol. 80, No. 2, 94–103, doi:10.1007/s00190-006-0036
Klokocnik et al. 2008: Variations in the Accuracy of Gravity Recovery due to Ground Track Variability: GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE, J. GEOD, Vol. 82, No. 12, 917–927, doi:10.1007/s00190-008-0222-0
Bezděk et al. 2009: Simulation of Free Fall and Resonances in the GOCE Mission, J. GEODYN., Vol. 48, No. 1, 47–53, doi:10.1016/j.jog.2009.01.007
Klokocnik et al. 2010: Orbit Tuning of Planetary Orbiters for Accuracy Gain in Gravity-Field Mapping, JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE, CONTROL, AND DYNAMICS, Vol. 33, No. 3, May–June, doi: 10.2514/1.46223.