1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II The Lost Volume Seller F.H. Buckley [email protected].

1

George Mason School of Law

Contracts II

The Lost Volume Seller

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]

What’s a Beyer to do?

Beyer agrees to buy a Corvette Pace Car from Sehler for $15,000. Before delivery, and before Beyer pays anything down, Sehler reneges.

Beyer knows that he can buy the same car from another deal for the same price.

2

What’s a Beyer to do?

Beyer agrees to buy a Corvette Pace Car from Sehler for $15,000. Before delivery, and before Beyer pays anything down, Sehler reneges.

Beyer knows that he can buy the same car from another deal for the same price.

What are Beyer’s damages?

3

What’s a Sehler to do? Beyer agrees to buy a Corvette Pace Car from

Sehler for $15,000. Before delivery, and before Beyer pays anything down, Beyer reneges.

4



Sehler has purchased 10 such cars from GM for $10,000 each and cannot acquire an additional one.

5




The day after Beyer’s breach, Sehler finds a replacement buyer and sells the car for $15,000. What is Beyer’s liability?

6




The day after Beyer’s breach, Sehler finds a replacement buyer and sells the car for $15,000. What is Beyer’s liability?

Where there is no “lost volume,” and the car is resold at the same price, only incidental damages

7

What’s a Sehler to do? Where there is no “lost volume,” and the car is

resold at the same price, only incidental damages UCC 2-708(1)

8




Same facts. There is a market for the car, but Sehler doesn’t bother trying to resell it. What is Beyer’s liability?

9




Same facts. There is a market for the car, but Sehler doesn’t bother trying to resell it. What is Beyer’s liability? UCC § 2-708(1): semble no damages

10

What’s a Sehler to do? Same facts. There is a market for the car, but

Sehler doesn’t bother trying to resell it. What is Beyer’s liability? Sehler is incentivized to resell in mitigation.

11




Same facts but now Sehler tries to resell the car and can only do so for scrap for $1,000. What is Beyer’s liability? What would you say Sehler lost?

12

What’s a Sehler to do? Same facts but now Sehler can’t find a

replacement buyer and sells the car for scrap for $1,000. What is Beyer’s liability? Seller might invoke 2-708(2) if he can’t reasonably effect

a resale

13

What’s a Sehler to do? Same facts but now Sehler can’t find a

replacement buyer and sells the car for scrap for $1,000. What is Beyer’s liability? UCC § 2-708(2)

“profit” “reasonable overhead” “proceeds of resale”

14



Sehler has purchased 10 such cars from GM for $10,000 each

Now assume that Sehler can acquire additional cars from manufacturer.

15




Now assume that Sehler can acquire additional cars from manufacturer

There’s a market out there for the cars, but Sehler doesn’t resell the car. What damages against Beyer?

16




Now assume that Sehler can acquire additional cars from manufacturer

There’s a market out there for the cars, but Sehler doesn’t resell the car. What damages against Beyer? UCC 2-708(1): Has Sehler failed to mitigate?

17




Now assume that Sehler can acquire additional cars from manufacturer.

Now Sehler resells the car to a replacement buyer for $15,000. What is Beyer’s liability?

18

What’s a Sehler to do? Now Sehler resells the car to a replacement buyer

for $15,000. What is Beyer’s liability? We’re assuming that Sehler could have sold the

car to Beyer and also an 11th car to the new buyer.

19

What’s a Sehler to do? Now Sehler resells the car to a replacement buyer

for $15,000. What is Beyer’s liability? We’re assuming that Sehler could have sold the

car to Beyer and also an 11th car to the new buyer.

But would the $10,000 purchase price from GM be counted as “overhead” under 2-708(2)?

20

What’s a Sehler to do? How well off would Sehler be if he had sold both

cars?

21


cars?1. He starts with his 10th car

22


cars?1. He starts with his 10th car2. Which he sells to Beyer for $15,000

23


cars?1. He starts with his 10th car2. Which he sells to Beyer for $15,0003. From which he buys a car from GM for $10,000, leaving

him $5,000

24



him $5,0004. He sells the 11th car for $15,000, which with the $5,000

gives him $20,000

25



him $5,0004. He sells the 11th car for $15,000, which with the $5,000

gives him $20,0005. So compensatory damages should leave Sehler with

$20,000

26

What’s a Sehler to do? What kind of damages should Sehler get from

Beyer to leave him with $20,000?

27

What’s a Sehler to do? What kind of damages should Sehler get from

Beyer to leave him with $20,000? He sells the car to the replacement buyer for $15,000,

leaving him $5,000 short…

28

Davis v. Diasonics at 926

Diasonics

medical equipment $300,000 deposit

Davis

29


Resale at the same price What is needed to invoke UCC § 708(2)?

30



Seller could have sold to both

31



Seller could have sold to both It would have been profitable for seller to

sell to both What does this mean?

32


Back to my example of the car sales. We are assuming: There was an infinite supply of cars from the

manufacturer for $10,000 each That the seller had bought 10 cars That he could have profitably sold a car to both

the defaulting and the new buyer (i.e., 11 cars in total)

33


But Diasonics (Goetz and Scott) ask us to question the last assmption: There was an infinite supply of cars from the

manufacturer for $10,000 each That the seller had bought 10 cars That he could have profitably sold a car to both


34


But Diasonics (Goetz and Scott) ask us to question the last assmption: That he could have profitably sold a car to both


Suppose that to do so Sehler would have needed a bigger car lot and that it decided that this was not cost-effective

35


But Diasonics (Goetz and Scott) ask us to question the last assmption: That he could have profitably sold a car to both


The Goetz-Scott challenge: wouldn’t seller always pick the number of cars it wants to sell at a break-even point

marginal revenue = marginal cost

36



So what would you need to rebut this—on remand in Diasonics?

37



So what would you need to rebut this—on remand in Diasonics? A change in the market? We didn’t think we’d want to sell

11, but that was then.

38



So what would you need to rebut this—on remand in Diasonics? We really planned to sell 11 all along.

39

Rodriguez at 929

40

Rodriguez at 929

Liquidated damages of a $250k deposit

Resale to Circus Circus at at $1.8M profit

41

Rodriguez at 929

Could Learjet have sold to both Rodriguez and Circus Circus?

42

Rodriguez at 929

Could Learjet have sold to both Rodriguez and Circus Circus? At 60 % capacity

43

Rodriguez at 929

Could Learjet have profitably sold to both Rodriguez and Circus Circus? At 60 % capacity Does this prove they could have sold more profitably,

asks the casebook

44

Rodriguez at 929

Can you draw any inferences about the lost volume seller from the willingness of merchants to sell to consumers on the basis of “goods satisfactory or money refunded”?

45

Personal Services Contracts

Gianetti at 933

46

Charitable Contributions

375 Park Avenue at 934 Could a donor who reneges claim that the donee

was not a “lost volume seller because it had unlimited naming opportunities?

47

1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II The Lost Volume Seller F.H. Buckley [email protected].

Documents

Transcript of 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II The Lost Volume Seller F.H. Buckley [email protected].