1 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Jan Van Doorn Director EUROCONTROL...
19
1 Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Jan Van Doorn Director EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre April 2006 ASAS / ADS-B: Implementation & Future Research
-
Upload
polly-jefferson -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Jan Van Doorn Director EUROCONTROL...
1European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Jan Van DoornDirector
EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
April 2006
ASAS / ADS-B:Implementation & Future Research
2
Two thoughts about ASAS / ADS-B …
“We are not implementing fast enough”
“We are not preparing the future”
3
A quotation from a Member of UK Parliament
Mr Tom Brake (UK) …
“May I ask the Minister a slightly more detailed question about the technology? I understand that there are air traffic control systems that could be based on individual aircraft and how they relate to one another. My understanding is that SESAR will not take that route. If I am correct, is there not a risk that in future Europe will be lumbered with an air traffic control system that is five or 10 years behind the best technology solution?”
4
Need to Implement
Integrated Future Research
Summary
5
Need to Implement:What have we got today?
US: starting to implement – ADS-B surveillance, spacing applications
Australia: starting to implement – ADS-B surveillance Europe:
CASCADE: ADS-B out, situation awareness … But, a lot of research over 10-15 years with little return:
defined Package 1 but are looking at Package 0.25 implementation!!
Overall: No significant change to ATM New technology still not implemented (data link/ADS-B)
6
Need to Implement:Why do we need to move forward?
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
Effective Capacity
Traffic volume (km)
source : EUROCONTROL
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
Effective Capacity
Traffic volume (km)
source : EUROCONTROL
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
Effective Capacity
Traffic volume (km)
source : EUROCONTROL
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
Effective Capacity
Traffic volume (km)
source : EUROCONTROL
The capacity of the ATM system has almost caught up with demand
7
Need to Implement: PRR8: Traffic Demand
3%
-2%
2%5%
7%6%2%
6% 4%6% 5%6%5% 3% 5% 4%4% 4%3%3%
0%
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
milli
on fl
ight
s pe
r ye
ar
Year on yearvariation
2005 Forecast
source : EUROCONTROL
( before 1997, estimation based on Euro 88 traffic variation)
Traffic
3%
-2%
2%5%
7%6%2%
6% 4%6% 5%6%5% 3% 5% 4%4% 4%3%3%
0%
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
milli
on fl
ight
s pe
r ye
ar
Year on yearvariation
2005 Forecast
source : EUROCONTROL
( before 1997, estimation based on Euro 88 traffic variation)
Traffic
• Very high growth in Central and Eastern Europe. • Managing such high growth does present a challenge.• ATM should be responsive enough to manage growth and adapt to unforeseen changes.
Growth 2005-2011Growth 2005-2011
8
Need to Implement: Demand is taking off
Traffic growth is robust: 4.5% for 2005 with summer (peak) growth at 4.7%
Capacity has not been able to keep pace Growth in 2006 is forecast at 4.1% Mid-term forecasts predict 26% in 6 years (with a high
of 37%)
2020 could quite conceivably see levels double 2005
9
Need to Implement: We are running out of quick wins
Scope for capacity increase by re-sectorisation and airspace restructuring in the core area is rapidly decreasing
PRR 8:“in some parts of the core area the sector throughput is already high (e.g. 55 a/c per hour in many sectors of Maastricht UAC) … additional capacity is required ... which calls for specific solutions …”
10
Need to implement:Disappointing validation results
“Many of the things we thought would generate significant capacity (tools, free-routing, data-link services …) have disappointed either in validation exercises or real-world experience”
11
Need to Implement:Where could ASAS fit?
WP3 in ASAS TN provides an glimpse of maturity: NRA and Spacing look relatively mature – what’s holding them back? Why are we not implementing? What do we have to do to convince?
Building links into other concepts to ensureacceptance Systemisation, P-RNAV, CDA Innovate the business case – take a risk!!
Australia – take a decision!! US – renting out the boxes!!
What can we exploit in Europe? Percentage equipage 1090 ES (35% already)
0
1
2
3
4Operational concept
Benefits &constraints
Safety
Procedures &human factors
Systems, HMI &Technology
Transition issues
0
1
2
3
4Operational concept
Benefits &constraints
Safety
Procedures &human factors
Systems, HMI &Technology
Transition issues
NRA
0
1
2
3
4Operational concept
Benefits & constraints
Safety
Procedures & humanfactors
Systems, HMI &Technology
Transition issues
0
1
2
3
4Operational concept
Benefits & constraints
Safety
Procedures & humanfactors
Systems, HMI &Technology
Transition issues
Spacing
12
Need to Implement
Integrated Future Research
Summary
13
Integrated future Research:Meeting the 2020 challenges
2020: Doubling the traffic
Need to break out of the traditional ways of thinkingNeed genuinely new solutions to ATM
Encourage those who are prepared to take risksInvest in potential breakthrough solutions
Work together!!
14
Integrated future Research
No current long term large scale Air Ground Integration, 4D or ASAS research projects
So:
“How can we build on SESAR, FP7 and local bottom up approaches”
15
Integrated future Research:A way forward
Pull together the approaches on Package 2 & 3
10 years ago we had PHARE on 4DMore recently we have had MFF on ADS-B / ASAS We can question the concept but research was done How can we benefit from this
Things to build on? Lessons to learn?
Are we ready to build an integrated research programme for advanced Air Ground Integration applications in Europe Implementation driven? In SESAR? In FP7?
16
Integrated future Research:Integrated future Concept
Rely on the strengths of each concept element:
4D for flow management, planning and avoidance of overloads to ensure system efficiency
ADS-B / ASAS for local tactical control to ensure safety and maximise capacity
17
Integrated future Research
Pan European Business / benefit driven
Attract decision makers!! Key stakeholders
Key system elements represented Conceptual Technical Human Factors & Safety Operational
Beyond Paper Simulation Live trials – real operational reality!! Confront technology!!
18
Need to Implement
Integrated Future Research
Summary
19
Summary
Build on SESAR and Joint Undertaking to implement Put ASAS Package 1 into SESAR!
Build on SESAR and FP7 and put your effort together to develop a long term programme Is it a virtual programme of loosely coordinated projects? Or will it be an ambitious and forward looking programme e.g. PHARE and
MFF Irrespective, it needs to be a recognised approach in SESAR (lobbying)
This is our challenge!
Work Together!!
Dare to take risks!!!
