1 Economics 122a Fall 2010 Agenda for this week: 1. The classical macro model (Chap 3) 2. How...
-
date post
22-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Economics 122a Fall 2010 Agenda for this week: 1. The classical macro model (Chap 3) 2. How...
1
Economics 122aFall 2010
Agenda for this week:
1. The classical macro model (Chap 3)
2. How economists measure output/income (Chap 2)
Some announcements• Final exam is being debated in the Registrar’s Office.
Mistake somewhere.
• Course is limited to those on course list on web page.
• Sections will begin next week
Wednesday 4:50-4:50 and 5:00-5:50
Thursday 4:50-4:50 and 5:00-5:50Thursday 7:00-7:50 and 8:00-8:50 (TENTATIVE)
2
3
Now Playing:
The Biggest Hit in Economics:
The Gross Domestic Product
4
Starring
Irving Fisher (Yale)
5
Starring
Simon Kuznets (Harvard)
6
Starring
Steve Landefeld(Bureau of EconomicAnalysis)
7Survey of Current Business, August 2010
Inflation as measured by the price of gross domestic purchases*
8
Note: This is a new concept, not in the textbooks. It reflects the prices of domestic purchases rather than domestic product.
9
10
Major concepts in national economic accounts
1. GDP measures final output of goods and services.2. Two ways of measuring GDP lead to identical results:
• Production = income3. Savings = investment is an accounting identity.
• We will also see that it is an equilibrium condition.• Note the advanced version of this includes government and foreign
sector. 4. GDP v. GNP: differs by ownership of factors5. Constant v. current prices: correct for changing prices6. Value added: Total sales less purchases of intermediate goods
- Note that income-side GDP adds up value addeds7. Net exports = exports – imports 8. Net v. gross investment:
• Net investment = gross investment minus deprecation
11
How to measure output growth?
Now take the following numerical example. • Suppose good 1 is computers and good 2 is shoes.
period 1 period 2
Ratio: period 2 to period 1
Real outputq1 1 100 100q2 1 1 1
Pricesp1 1 0.010 0.010p2 1 1.00 1.00
How would we measure total output and prices?
The growth picture for index numbers:the real numbers!
12
Output (109 2005 $) Growth of sector
Sector 1958 2008 Rate per year Growth Factor
Computers 0.00002 157.03200 31.8% 8,049,116.8
Non computers 2,578 13,155 3.3% 5.1
Source: Bureau of Economics Analysis
13
Some answers
• We want to construct a measure of real output, Q = f(q1,…,
qn ;p1,…, pn)
• How do we aggregate the qi to get total real, GDP(Q)?
– Old fashioned fixed weights: Calculate output using the prices of a given year, and then add up different sectors.
– New fangled chain weights: Use new “superlative” techniques
14
Old fashioned price and output indexes
Laspeyres (1871): weights with prices of base yearLt = ∑ wi,base year (Δq/q)i,t
Paasche (1874): use current (latest) prices as weights
Πt = ∑ wi,t (Δq/q)i,t
15
Start with Laspeyres and Paasche
HUGE difference!
What to do?
period 1 period 2
Ratio: period 2 to period 1
Real outputq1 1 100 100q2 1 1 1
Pricesp1 1 0.010 0.010p2 1 1.00 1.00
Nominal output
= ∑piqi 2.0 2.0 1.0Quantity indexes
Laspeyres (early p) 2.000 101.000 50.50Paasche (late p) 1.010 2.000 1.98
16
Solution
Brilliant idea: Ask how utility of output differs across different bundles. Let U(q1, q2) be the utility function. Assume have {qt} = {qt
1, qt2}. Then
growth is:g({qt}/{qt-1}) = U(qt)/U(qt-1).
For example, assume “Cobb-Douglas” utility function, Q = U = (q1)λ (q2) 1- λ
Also, define the (logarithmic) growth rate of xt as g(xt) = ln(xt/xt-1). Then
Qt / Qt-1 =[(qt1)λ (qt
2) 1- λ]/[(qt-1
1)λ (qt-12)
1- λ]
g(Qt) = ln(Qt/Qt-1) = λ ln(qt1/qt-1
1) + (1-λ) ln(qt2/qt-1
2)
g(Qt) = λ g(qt1) + (1-λ) g(qt
2)
The class of 2nd order approximations is called “superlative.”This is a superlative index called the Törnqvist index.
17
What do we find?
1. L > Util > P [that is, Laspeyres overstates growth and Paasche understates relative to true.
period 1 period 2
Ratio: period 2 to period 1
Real outputq1 1 100 100q2 1 1 1
Pricesp1 1 0.010 0.010p2 1 1.00 1.00
Nominal output
= ∑piqi 2.0 2.0 1.0
Utility = (q1*q2)̂ .5 1.00 10.00 10.00
Quantity indexes
Laspeyres (early p) 2.000 101.000 50.50Paasche (late p) 1.010 2.000 1.98
18
Currently used “superlative” indexes
Fisher* Ideal (1922): geometric mean of L and P:Ft = (Lt × Πt )½
Törnqvist (1936): average geometric growth rate:
(ΔQ/Q)t = ∑ si,T (Δq/q)i,t, where si,T =average nominal share
of industry in 2 periods
(*Irving Fisher (YC 1888), America’s greatest macroeconomist)
19
Now we construct new indexes as above: Fisher and Törnqvist
Superlatives (here Fisher and Törnqvist) are exactly correct.
Usually very close to true.
period 1 period 2
Ratio: period 2 to period 1
Real outputq1 1 100 100q2 1 1 1
Pricesp1 1 0.010 0.010p2 1 1.00 1.00
Nominal output = ∑piqi 2.0 2.0 1.0
Utility = (q1*q2)̂ .5 1.00 10.00 10.00
Quantity indexes
Fisher (geo mean of L and P) 1.421 14.213 10.00
Törnqvist (wt. average growth rate) 1.000 10.000 10.00
Calculation of output for our example
Fisher:Growth = (L x P)^.5 = (1.98 x 50.50)^.5 = 10.0
Tornqvist: = exp[ ln(100/1)*0.5+ln(1/1)*0.5 ] = exp[4.60517 *0.5+0*0.5 ] = exp[2.302585 ]= 10.0
For this, remember that the logarithmic growth of X from 1 to 2 is
g = ln(X2/X1). So the index of output is exp(g).
20
21
Current approaches
• Most national accounts used Laspeyres until recently– Why Laspeyres? Primarily because the data
requirements are less stringent.• CPI uses Laspeyres index. • US moved to Fisher for national accounts in 1995• BLS has constructed “chained CPI” using Törnqvist since
2002• China still uses Laspeyres in its GDP.
– Who knows whether Chinese data are accurate???
22
Who cares about GDP and CPI measurement?
Some examples where makes a big difference
• Social security for grandma• Taxes for you• Estimated rate of productivity growth for budget
– and, therefore, Congress’s spending inclinations• Comparisons of military “power”
– Overestimates of Soviet GDP in 1980s led Reagan administration to large increase in military budget
– People are now worrying about Chinese power because it is now “number 2”
• Projections of emissions in global warming models