1 Department of Production and Quality Engineering Rethinking Project Risk Management PUS Seminar,...
-
Upload
maryam-steve -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Department of Production and Quality Engineering Rethinking Project Risk Management PUS Seminar,...
1
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Rethinking ProjectRisk Management
PUS Seminar, November 30, 2010
Professor Asbjorn RolstadasNorwegian University of Science and Technology
2
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Project Management - State of Art
PMI driven Main focus on delivery projects Structured approach Make a plan and stick to it Manage deviations and changes Avoid or manage risk
3
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
All Projects Carry Risk
Scope creep Hope creep Effort creep Feature creep
Scope
CostTimeFrom Wysocki
4
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Uncertainty, Risk and Opportunity
Uncertainty More than one outcome Connected to probability Representing a state of insufficient information Opposite of certainty
Risk Event that has negative consequences if it happens Probability of event multiplied by consequences
Opportunity Event that has positive consequences if it happens Probability of event multiplied by consequences
5
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Stakeholders Create RiskP
ower
to In
fluen
ce
Level of Interest
Low
HighLow
External Stakeholder
Key PlayerHostage
The Grey Eminence
To be kept satisfied To be involved
To be kept informedTo be briefed
Hig
h
6
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Traditional Risk Management
Riskidentification
Quantitativeanalysis
Qualitativeanalysis
Riskcontrol
7
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
PMI Risk Management ProcessesDescribes the processes concerned with conducting risk management on a project
Project Risk Management
Risk Management Planning
Risk Identification
Qualitative Risk Analysis
Quantitative Risk Analysis
Risk Response Planning
Risk Monitoring and Control
8
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Out of the Box Thinking Blue Ocean Strategy Black Swan The Tipping Point Reinventing Project Management Managing the Unknown Agile Project Management Risk Navigation Strategies – Beyond the Myth of
Predictability
9
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Red Ocean Competitive battlefield All competitors present Fighting to be the best and beat each other Focusing on economic growth
10
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Blue Ocean Sectors or companies that do not exist today Unknown market place Beyond competition Strategy to survive by creating new markets and
making competition irrelevant Created in Red Oceans by extending limits
11
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Black Swans
It is an outlier It carries extreme impact Human nature makes us concoct
explanations for its occurrence after the fact, making it seem explainable and predictable
12
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
The Protective Approach
Focus on front-end loading Predict everything as accurately as possible Minimize financial risk Avoid surprises during project execution
Keep fighting in the red ocean Accept black swans
13
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
The Offensive Approach
Live with risk throughout the project Postpone decision as long as possible Capitalize on emerging opportunities (risks) Stimulate agility – empower the PM
Move into the blue ocean
14
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Risk and Complexity
Risk
Small Large
Com
plex
ity
Sm
all
Larg
e
Traditional project management
Focus on structureü Top-downü Risk aversü Systematic
Focus on flexibilityü Bottom-upü Risk preventivü Creative
?
From Hartman
15
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Current Risk Management Thinking
Focus on predictability Fight uncertainty and risk Create risk buffers Exercise strong control
16
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
The Tunnelling Concept (Taleb)
Neglect of sources of uncertainty outside the plan itself
Data that supports our proposition is embraced and utilized to further increase that support, while data that challenges it is ignored, dismissed
Reducing our ability to see outside the boundaries of our assumptions
20
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Types of Risk
Operational Within control of the PM
Strategic Within control of the owner
Contextual External or interlinked with other projects
21
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Decision Model
f(x,t,y,z)=0
y
zx
t
Decision Model
Controllable factorsPotential actions
Irrelevant consequencesIrrelevant variables
Non-controllable factorsPotential states
Results/consquencesTarget variables
22
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Uncertainty and Risk
Action
Influence
Uncertainty Impact
Potential result
Impact
Impact
Opportunity
NatureStake-holders
Directly involved in project
Directly involved in project results
Indirectly influencing
Risk
Potential result
Potential result
23
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Decision Process
Results achieved
Problems identified
ObjectivesPolicies
Decisionpreparation
Decision methods
Decision factors
Inputs
Action
Action
Action Result
Result
Result
Approval
Final approval
Authorization
Yes
Yes
Yes
YesYes
NoNo
No
No
No
29
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
A New Approach The notion of the Bermuda Project Risk Triangle
including operational, strategic and contextual risks A change process leading from exploring via
adapting to delivering (illustrated as a journey) A framework for the Extended Project Risk Navigator
containing the three main components: Governance system, Decision process, and Strategic planning.
30
Department of Production and Quality Engineering
Shifts in Mindset Required
From projects as deliveries - to means to enhance project business value
From viewing uncertainties as “evil” - to acknowledge the project nature being unique and uncertain, hence requiring dynamic strategies
From projects as known tasks to be accomplished – to embrace a continuum of known-unknown tasks to be executed
From viewing deviations from project baselines as inaccurate planning or inappropriate control – to acknowledgement of deviations being the rule and not the exception