1 Control procedures: EC Audits European Commission RTD.M.1 External audits Maurizio Dal Toso...
-
Upload
tia-quincey -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
5
Transcript of 1 Control procedures: EC Audits European Commission RTD.M.1 External audits Maurizio Dal Toso...
1
Control procedures: EC Audits
European CommissionRTD.M.1 External audits
Maurizio Dal Toso
Horizon 2020Tallinn 1/12/2011
2
Topics
EC Audit in FP71. When?
2. Who can carry out an audit
3. What is verified in an audit?
4. How is it verified? Audit Procedures
5. Which are the supporting documents for the audit?
6. Which are the obligations of the beneficiaries?
7. Audit Reports, implementation & follow-up
3
1-Audit : when?
Article II.23 of ECGA - Technical audits and reviews: “The Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to up to five years after the end of the project.”
Article II.23 of ECGA - Technical audits and reviews: “The Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to up to five years after the end of the project.”
Article II.22 of ECGA – Financial audits and controls: “The Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project, and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out”.
Article II.22 of ECGA – Financial audits and controls: “The Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project, and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out”.
4DG RTD-A.4
2-Audits: Who?
Audits by EC auditors (RTD-M.01)
• Approx. 1/3 of audits • Specific audits (follow-up, requests, …)
Audits by Contracted firms (RTD-M.02)
• Approx. 2/3 of audits • Supervision of the audit by EC services
Clashes
Article II.22 of ECGA – Financial audits and controls
3. Audits may be carried out by:
• The Commission (its own departments – including OLAF – or by any of its duly authorised representatives (including external auditors appointed by the Commission).
• The European Court of Auditors (by its own departments or by any of its duly authorised representatives).
Article II.22 of ECGA – Financial audits and controls
3. Audits may be carried out by:
• The Commission (its own departments – including OLAF – or by any of its duly authorised representatives (including external auditors appointed by the Commission).
• The European Court of Auditors (by its own departments or by any of its duly authorised representatives).
7
Topics
EC Audit in FP71. When?2. Who can carry out an audit3. What is verified in an audit?4. How is it verified? Audit Procedures5. Supporting documents for the audit6. Obligations of the beneficiaries 7. Internal strategy concerning audits8. Audit Reports
8
Technical audits – what is verified?• Technical review is performed at the project level
by Project Officers and/or external experts to give external advice to the Commission
Article II.23 of ECGA - Technical audits and reviews
…The aim of a technical audit or review shall be to assess the work carried out under the project over a certain period, inter alia by evaluating the project reports and deliverables relevant to the period in question. Such audits and reviews may cover scientific, technological and other aspects relating to the proper execution of the project and the grant agreement.
9
Financial audits – what is verified?
• Article II.22 of ECGA – Financial audits and controls: … “Such audits may cover financial, systemic and other aspects (such as accounting and management principles) relating to the proper execution of the grant agreement.”
• Article II.22 of ECGA – Financial audits and controls: … “Such audits may cover financial, systemic and other aspects (such as accounting and management principles) relating to the proper execution of the grant agreement.”
10
Topics
EC Audit in FP71. When?2. Who can carry out an audit3. What is verified in an audit?4. How is it verified? Audit Procedures5. Supporting documents for the audit6. Obligations of the beneficiaries 7. Internal strategy concerning audits8. Audit Reports
11
Audit CycleAudit Strategy & Selection
Planning & Preparation
Examination on site
Reporting &Audit Closure
Implementationof Audit Results
12
Audit Cycle - Timeline
Audit Strategy & Selection
Planning & Preparation
Examination on site
Reporting &Audit Closure
Implementationof Audit Results
3 months 3-4 months
1313
Audit on-the-spot – Preparation
• Selection of Agreements• Initial contact by the responsible auditor approx. 2 month
before examination on site to agree on dates and logistics
• Collection of audit information (internal and external) • Formal Announcement including detailed annex on
information and documentation to be provided:– prior to the audit examination on site– at the time of the audit examination
14
Examination on site
Openingmeeting
Analysis of Systems in place
Test of systemsand substantive
evidence
Closuremeeting
Assessmentafter on site
visit
Usually within 4-5 working days (one week) (…)
General info on:
• organisation
• projects
• financial administration
• internal control system
Clarification on audit agenda for further days
Analysis of documents and explanation received and collection of audit evidence
Discussion ofpreliminary findings andobservations
Indication of further audit procedure
Audit Process Handbook
Different legislationDifferences in administrative culture
15
Article II.22 of ECGA – Financial audits and controls
In order to permit a complete, true and fair verification that the project and the grant are (have been) properly managed and performed, beneficiaries are required to:
• keep the originals, or in exceptional cases, where the national legislation accepts or contemplates this possibility, duly authenticated copies – including electronic copies – of all documents relating to the grant agreement for up to five years from the end of the project.
• ensure that the Commission's services, and/or any external body(ies) authorised by it, have
• on-the-spot access at all reasonable times, notably to the beneficiary's offices where the project is being carried out, to its computer data, to its accounting data and to all the information needed to carry out those audits, including information on individual salaries of persons involved in the project. They shall ensure that the information is readily available on the spot at the moment of the audit and, if so requested, that data be handed over in an appropriate form.
• make available directly to the Commission all the detailed data that it may request,
• ensure that the rights of the Commission and the European Court of Auditors to carry out audits are extended to the right to carry out any such audit or control on any third party whose costs are reimbursed in full or in part by the EC contribution, on the same terms and conditions.
Article II.22 of ECGA – Financial audits and controls
In order to permit a complete, true and fair verification that the project and the grant are (have been) properly managed and performed, beneficiaries are required to:
• keep the originals, or in exceptional cases, where the national legislation accepts or contemplates this possibility, duly authenticated copies – including electronic copies – of all documents relating to the grant agreement for up to five years from the end of the project.
• ensure that the Commission's services, and/or any external body(ies) authorised by it, have
• on-the-spot access at all reasonable times, notably to the beneficiary's offices where the project is being carried out, to its computer data, to its accounting data and to all the information needed to carry out those audits, including information on individual salaries of persons involved in the project. They shall ensure that the information is readily available on the spot at the moment of the audit and, if so requested, that data be handed over in an appropriate form.
• make available directly to the Commission all the detailed data that it may request,
• ensure that the rights of the Commission and the European Court of Auditors to carry out audits are extended to the right to carry out any such audit or control on any third party whose costs are reimbursed in full or in part by the EC contribution, on the same terms and conditions.
5-Supporting documents for the audit
16
6-Beneficiaries' obligationsArticle II.22 of ECGA – Financial audits and controls
In order to permit a complete, true and fair verification that the project and the grant are (have been) properly managed and performed, beneficiaries are required to:
• keep the originals, or in exceptional cases, where the national legislation accepts or contemplates this possibility, duly authenticated copies – including electronic copies – of all documents relating to the grant agreement for up to five years from the end of the project.
• ensure that the Commission's services, and/or any external body(ies) authorised by it, have on-the-spot access at all reasonable times, notably to the beneficiary's offices where the project is being carried out, to its computer data, to its accounting data and to all the information needed to carry out those audits, including information on individual salaries of persons involved in the project. They shall ensure that the information is readily available on the spot at the moment of the audit and, if so requested, that data be handed over in an appropriate form.
• make available directly to the Commission all the detailed data that it may request,• ensure that the rights of the Commission and the European Court of Auditors to
carry out audits are extended to the right to carry out any such audit or control on any third party whose costs are reimbursed in full or in part by the EC contribution, on the same terms and conditions.
Article II.22 of ECGA – Financial audits and controls
In order to permit a complete, true and fair verification that the project and the grant are (have been) properly managed and performed, beneficiaries are required to:
• keep the originals, or in exceptional cases, where the national legislation accepts or contemplates this possibility, duly authenticated copies – including electronic copies – of all documents relating to the grant agreement for up to five years from the end of the project.
• ensure that the Commission's services, and/or any external body(ies) authorised by it, have on-the-spot access at all reasonable times, notably to the beneficiary's offices where the project is being carried out, to its computer data, to its accounting data and to all the information needed to carry out those audits, including information on individual salaries of persons involved in the project. They shall ensure that the information is readily available on the spot at the moment of the audit and, if so requested, that data be handed over in an appropriate form.
• make available directly to the Commission all the detailed data that it may request,• ensure that the rights of the Commission and the European Court of Auditors to
carry out audits are extended to the right to carry out any such audit or control on any third party whose costs are reimbursed in full or in part by the EC contribution, on the same terms and conditions.
17
Topics
EC Audit in FP71. When?2. Who can carry out an audit3. What is verified in an audit?4. How is it verified? Audit Procedures5. Supporting documents for the audit6. Obligations of the beneficiaries 7. Audit Reports, implementation & follow-up8. Audit strategy
18
Quality control
• Quality check on audit report for– Coherence– Completeness– Correctness– Compliance with the Audit Handbook
• Audit Steering Committee
19
Reporting and Closure of the Audit
• Transmission of Draft audit report (after internal consultations) for comments by the audited organisation– Usually based on the preliminary conclusions– Delay (30 days) to provide comments to the draft– Letter of representation
• Consideration of comments and finalisation of the audit report• Closure of the audit by formal letter indicating the further
procedures on the implementation of audit results
END OF THE AUDIT
20
Implementation of Audit Results
21
General
• Financial adjustments administred by the operational EC service in charge of the project management (decentralised)
• Besides adjustments, possibility of liquidated damages
• Consideration of serious audit findings (i.e. high adjustments) in future project and agreement negotiations
22
Implementation of Results: Cases
No findings
Financial Adjustment
(Only) qualified recommendation
Non-systematicfinding identified
Systematicfinding identified
Implementation finalised
Correction of future payments or recovery by the responsible financial services
Extrapolationof audit results
Follow-up Audit
23
Implementation of Results – Systematic Finding
• The implication of this type of error is that the beneficiary is not complying in a systematic way with his agreement obligation .
• Assumption:– Can imply that all currently open and closed agreements under
the same framework program (FP) are affected and might need to be (retrospectively) adjusted
• Impact:– Beneficiaries will be asked to reconsider all financial statements
handed in under the same FP and where necessary recalculate and revise the statements
26
Audit tools: extrapolationSystematic errors
Extrapolation Steering Committee
RDG common decision
Joint RDG projects list
Audit closure
Extrapolation process start
Implementation by operational directorates
NON Systematic errors
Audit closure
Implementation by operational directorates
FP7 Audit Strategy
28
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
FP6 / FP7 Audit certification policy websitehttp://cordis.europa.eu/audit-certification/home_en.html
FP7 Certification FAQs
ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/docs/faq-certification_en.pdf
http://ec.europa.eu/research/enquiries
And in case of doubts, don't forget:
RESEARCH HELPDESK
Guidance notes on FP7 audit certificationhttp://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/find-doc_en.html#guidance
29
Questions?
30
The End
DG RTD-A.4