1 Comments on The R&D Production Process: Measuring R&D Kevin J. Stiroh * Federal Reserve Bank of...
-
Upload
arron-matthews -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Comments on The R&D Production Process: Measuring R&D Kevin J. Stiroh * Federal Reserve Bank of...
1
Comments on
The R&D Production Process: Measuring R&D
Kevin J. Stiroh *
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
December 13, 2006
*These comments are the views of the author only and do not necessarily reflect those of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
2
• R&D Issues
• Major Comments– Is R&D fundamentally different?
– Consistency and transparency
• Other Thoughts
Outline
3
R&D Issues
BLS (1989)1) Lags
2) Depreciation
3) Deflator
4) Basic vs. applied research
5) Government vs. private finance
6) Product vs. process
7) Impact of R&D stock on productivity
8) Change in returns over time
“The Impact of Research and Development on Productivity Growth”, September 1989, pg. 6.
BEA (2006)1) Scope of R&D investment
2) Assigning ownership
3) Measure of investment
4) Deflator
5) Depreciation
6) Gestation lags
7) Rates of returns
“R&D Satellite Account: Preliminary Estimates,” September 2006, pg. 18.
4
Is R&D Fundamentally Different?
• Methodology states no– Familiar variables: I, P, , K, r, etc.
– Treat R&D analogously to tangible capital with no explicit spillovers
– “Just” measurement problems
• Language implies yes– Presumption of spillovers due to public good qualities of R&D
• “Measuring R&D” handout • 9/29/06 BEA Press Release• “R&D Satellite Account: Preliminary Estimates”
• Apparent disconnect with important implications– Rate of return
• Firm-level incentives to invest vs. GDP impact
– Some claim IT has spillovers• Would methodology change for tangible capital?• What is burden of proof?
5
Consistency and Transparency
• Will internally consistent industry data be available?– Difficult, but area where biggest value/impact
• Particularly for question of spillovers
– Data ideally presented on par with aggregates• For fixed assets, BEA has disclaimer about industry/asset breakdown
• Will users understand the data and methodology?– More precision about exactly what was done
– Example• Identify “Scenario D” as implemented one only on pg. 56• “Market value” used in various ways
– More equations and definitions would help
6
Other Thoughts
• Alternative scenarios in “R&D Satellite Account” are interesting– Highlight sensitivity and key areas for more work
• Two outsider’s questions:– How does this compare to what BLS does?
– Can BEA sponsor new research on issues such as rates of returns, deflators, and depreciation rates?