1 Comments from related national RTD programs ICE 2003 Roadcon roadmapping session Wednesday...
-
Upload
letitia-ray -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Comments from related national RTD programs ICE 2003 Roadcon roadmapping session Wednesday...
Comments from related national RTD programs
ICE 2003 Roadcon roadmapping session
Wednesday 18.6.2003
Dipoli
Mika LAUTANALA
Chief Technology Adviser
PO Box 69, 00101 HelsinkiTel. +358 10 521 5838GSM +358 50 5577838
2
Innovation systemResources and funding in 2001
Pri
vate
Basic research Applied research Business R&D
Business developmentMarketingInternationalisation
R&Dat companies
3,284
The figures represent the total extent of each organisation in million euros in 2001. In parenthesis the share that is funded from the State budget. The funds of Tekes, the Academy of Finland and Innofin are
funded entirely from the State budget.
BusinessAngels
380
Pu
blic
Finnvera332 (44)
Universities834 (364)
Academyof Finland
184Ministries,
TE-Centres,sectorial research
287 (209)
Tekes386
VTT214 (68)
From abroad115
Innofin5 (4)
Finpro55 (30)
Venture capitalists:Private 287
Industry Investment Ltd 38 (42)Sitra 64
3
R&D input in some OECD countries
Sources: OECD, Main Science and Technology Indicators database, Statistics Finland (Finland 2002) and Statistiska centralbyrån (Sweden 2001, estimate).
USA
Japan
Germany
Sweden
Great Britain
France
Austria
FINLAND
Denmark
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02
OECD total
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
4.0
Percentage of GDP
est.
Canada
Israel4.5
0.5
Iceland
South Korea
Singapore
China
Norway
4
Competitiveness by country
1
3
5
79
11
13
15
17
19
21
2325
27
29
31
Source: The World Competitiveness Yearbook
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Ranking by IMDRanking by IMDUSAFINLANDLuxembourgNetherlandsSingaporeDenmarkSwitzerlandCanada
Hong KongIrelandSwedenGermanyNorwayFrance
Japan
5
Competitiveness scoreboard
* Based on earlier competitiveness index of micro economy
Total rankingTotal ranking
WEFTotal growth
competitiveness
IMDTotal competitiveness
20002001
WEFCurrent
competitiveness1999*20002001 199920002002 2001 1999
USAFINLANDLuxembourgNetherlandsSingaporeDenmarkSwitzerlandCanadaHong KongIrelandSwedenIcelandGermanyFranceJapan
21..4965
111622
717
31514
21..3
1085
111822
616
41215
12..3
12758
2117
422
69
14
16342
1410
785
1324152221
21..84
1415
31311
916172021
211
791
17653
101918252314
14632
1378
125
149
112224
123456789
101112152230
13452
1510
9678
13122526
1534297
1068
1413122324
Sources: The World Competitiveness Yearbook (IMD) and The Global Competitiveness Report (WEF)
6
Competitiveness comparison
Ranking by the science and technology factorRanking by the science and technology factor
IMD UNDP
Sources: The World Competitiveness Yearbook (IMD), The Global Competitiveness Report (WEF) and Human Development Report
(UNDP)
Techno- Scienti-logical ficalinfrastructure
Science and technology
WEF
USASwedenFINLANDIcelandAustraliaCanadaDenmarkNorwaySingaporeNetherlandsIrelandSwitzerlandGermanyJapanFrance
20002001 2001 1999
156
1318161015
98
173427
123456789
101213151923
156
132012
82310
918
3427
156
191613
91712
811
3427
19971998
121
63124
92311
812
75324
115
62621121420
911
85324
20002001 1999
192
2623141329
315
4657
11
163
1952
127
18142824152317
110
323
64
1315
216
81117
512
2001
231..98..
1210
613..
114
17
7
Real Estate and Construction Cluster
Real EstateBuilding
Construction
Building material
and productINFRA
Building Services
ProBuild
8
Global Megatrends in RECC
The end users (companies and consumers) are becoming more and more global
real estate business has to become international (global) business
the whole RECC value chain has to harmonize globally standards, codes and even products
the whole RECC value chain has to network globally real estate and construction business has to be more
transparent need of knowledge and data grows dramatically information and communications technology (ICT)
becomes core of the RECC business innovation management will become the driving
force of business network in RECC
9
RECC STRATEGY 2003-The New Mission
The new mission of the Real Estate and Construction Cluster:
Real Estate and Construction Cluster provides the infrastructure and the platform for:
global success of all businesses and well-being of the society
The cluster itself measures the benefits the value network offers to the end user
10
Technology programmes on construction
9797 9898 9999 0000 0101 0202 0303 0404 0505 0606 0707 0808
Sara
Value Added Wood Chain
Rembrand
Infra
CUBE
Vera
Healthy Building
ProBuild
SamBa
Stone
Divan
FinnSteel
Environmental tech. construction
Wood construction
Simulation
Industrialised Building Construction
1987-1991
11
DevelopmeDevelopment of the nt of the AEC/FM AEC/FM
ProcessesProcesses
Efficient Efficient Use of the Use of the InformatioInformation Networksn Networks
InformatioInformation Sharingn Sharing
ImplementatImplementation of ICT in ion of ICT in the Value the Value
ChainChainLife Cycle Life Cycle
Information Information ManagemeManageme
ntnt
SYNERGYSYNERGY
Vera Program Target Information Networking in the Construction Process
The target is to promote the implementation and use of ICT and networks as the enabling technologies to re-engineer the design, construction and FM processes
12
VisionVision
Programme organisation
GrantsLoansCapital loans
Researchfunding
Programme Manager
Tekes
• preparation• co-ordination• decisions
Private development projects
Publid research projects
SynergyNetworking
Funding
Steering Board• Lauri Ratia, chair• Mika Halttunen• Markku Hautanen• Kari Inkinen• Erkki KM Leppävuori• Juhani Sormaala• Mika Lautanala
SARAprogramme
13
Porter Value Chain
• Cost based competition• Business process driven by lowest cost• User needs neglected• Does not promote innovations• Suboptimization
2211 554433
14
Value Network
• Performance and quality based competition• Business process driven by customer perceived value• User needs control the process• Encourages to innovations • Total optimisation• Transparency and partnering
22
11 55
44 33
15
Process orientation
Manu-facturing
ContractingDesign Trans-portation
Sub-contracting
16
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 TotalFunding source M€ M€ M€ M€ M€ M€Tekes 2,800 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,900 14,700Funding to research 0,800 1,000 1,000 0,700 0,500 4,000Grants to companies 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,500 1,600 7,000Loans to companies 0,700 0,700 0,700 0,800 0,800 3,700Companies 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,800 4,000 18,300Total 6,300 6,500 6,500 6,800 6,900 33,000
Programme budget
17
Thank You!Thank You!
www.tekes.fi/english/programmes/sara/www.tekes.fi/english/programmes/sara/