1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

57
1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies

Transcript of 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

Page 1: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

1

CHAPTER 26

Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding

Companies

Page 2: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

2

Topics in Chapter

Types of mergers Merger analysis Role of investment bankers LBOs, divestitures, and holding

companies

Page 3: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

3

What are some valid economicjustifications for mergers?

Synergy: Value of the whole exceeds sum of the parts. Could arise from: Operating economies Financial economies Differential management efficiency Taxes (use accumulated losses)

(More...)

Page 4: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

4

Valid Reasons (Continued)

Break-up value: Assets would be more valuable if broken up and sold to other companies.

Page 5: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

5

What are some questionablereasons for mergers?

Diversification Purchase of assets at below

replacement cost Acquire other firms to increase

size, thus making it more difficult to be acquired

Page 6: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

6

Five Largest Completed Mergers(as of December, 2007)

BUYER TARGETVALUE

(Billion)Vodafone AirTouch Mannesman $161

PfizerWarner-Lambert 116

America Online Time Warner 106

RFS HoldingsABN-AMRO Holding 99

Exxon Mobil 81

Page 7: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

7

Differentiate between hostile and friendly mergers

Friendly merger: The merger is supported by the

managements of both firms.

(More...)

Page 8: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

8

Hostile merger: Target firm’s management resists the

merger. Acquirer must go directly to the target

firm’s stockholders, try to get 51% to tender their shares.

Often, mergers that start out hostile end up as friendly, when offer price is raised.

Page 9: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

9

Reasons why alliances can make more sense than acquisitions

Access to new markets and technologies

Multiple parties share risks and expenses

Rivals can often work together harmoniously

Antitrust laws can shelter cooperative R&D activities

Page 10: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

10

Reason to Use APV in Merger Valuation Often in a merger the capital

structure changes rapidly over the first several years.

This causes the WACC to change from year to year.

It is hard to incorporate year-to-year changes in WACC in the corporate valuation model.

Page 11: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

11

The APV Model

Value of firm if it had no debt+ Value of tax savings due to debt= Value of operations

First term is called the unlevered value of the firm. The second term is called the value of the interest tax shield.

(More...)

Page 12: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

12

APV Model Unlevered value of firm = PV of FCFs

discounted at unlevered cost of equity, rsU.

Value of interest tax shield = PV of interest tax savings discounted at unlevered cost of equity.

Interest tax savings = Interest(tax rate) = TSt.

Page 13: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

13

Note to APV

APV is the best model to use when the capital structure is changing.

The Corporate Valuation model (i.e., discount FCF at WACC) is easier to use than APV when the capital structure is constant.

Page 14: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

14

Steps in APV Valuation Project FCFt ,TSt until company is at its

target capital structure for one year and is expected to grow at a constant rate thereafter.

Project horizon growth rate. Calculate the unlevered cost of equity,

rsU. Calculate horizon value of tax shields

using constant growth formula and TSN. Calculate horizon value of unlevered

firm using constant growth formula and FCFN.

(More...)

Page 15: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

15

Steps in APV Valuation (Continued)

Calculate unlevered value of firm as PV of unlevered horizon value and FCFt

Calculate value of tax shields as PV of tax shield horizon value and TSt

Calculate Vops as sum of unlevered value and tax shield value.

Page 16: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

16

Estimating the Value of Equity

Value of operations + Value of any non-operating assets = Total value of the firm - Value of debt (pre-merger) = Value of equity

Page 17: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

17

APV Valuation Analysis (In Millions) Based on Post-Acquisition Cash Flows

2009 2010 2011Net sales 60.00$ 90.00$ Cost of goods sold (60%) 36.00 54.00Selling/administrative expense 4.50 6.00EBIT 19.50 30.00Taxes on EBIT (40%) 7.80 12.00NOPAT 11.70 18.00Total net operating capital 150.0 150.00 157.50Investment in net operating capital 0.00 7.50Free Cash Flow 11.70 10.50

Page 18: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

18

Cash flows… continued2012 2013 2014

Net sales 112.50$ 127.50$ 139.70$ Cost of goods sold (60%) 67.50 76.50 83.80 Selling/administrative expense 7.50 9.00 11.00 EBIT 37.50 42.00 44.90 Taxes on EBIT (40%) 15.00 16.80 17.96 NOPAT 22.50 25.20 26.94 Total net operating capital 163.50 168.00 173.00 Investment in net operating capital 6.00 4.50 5.00 Free Cash Flow 16.50 20.70 21.94

Page 19: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

19

Interest Tax Savings after Merger

Note: Tax savings = interest expense (Tax rate). The tax rate is 40%

2009 2010 2011Interest expense 5.00 6.50Tax savings from interest 2.00$ 2.60$

2012 2013 2014Interest expense 6.50 7.00 8.16Tax savings from interest 2.60$ 2.80$ 3.26$

Page 20: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

20

What is investment in net operating capital?

Recall that firms must reinvest in order to replace worn out assets and grow.

Investment in net operating capital = change in total net operating capital.

This is equivalent to gross investment in operating capital minus depreciation

Page 21: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

21

Non-Operating Assets

Short-term investments and marketable securities are non-operating assets. The Target has none of these.

Page 22: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

22

What is the appropriate discount rate to apply to the target’s cash flows?

After acquisition, the free cash flows belong to the remaining debtholders in the target and the various investors in the acquiring firm: their debtholders, stockholders, and others such as preferred stockholders.

These cash flows can be redeployed within the acquiring firm.

(More...)

Page 23: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

23

Discount rate…

Free cash flow is the cash flow that would occur if the firm had no debt, so it should be discounted at the unlevered cost of equity, rsU

The interest tax shields are also discounted at the unlevered cost of equity, rsU

Page 24: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

24

Note: Comparison of APV with Corporate Valuation Model

APV discounts FCF at rsU and also the tax shields at rsU; the value of the tax savings is incorporated explicitly.

Corp. Val. Model discounts FCF at WACC, which has a (1-T) factor to account for the value of the tax shield.

Both models give same answer if the capital structure is constant. But if the capital structure is changing, then APV should be used.

Page 25: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

25

Discount Rate for Horizon Value The last year of projections must be at

the target capital structure with constant growth thereafter.

Discount the FCFs using the constant growth formula to find the unlevered horizon value.

Discount the tax shields using the constant growth formula to find the horizon value of the tax shields.

Page 26: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

26

Target’s data: rRF = 7%; RPM = 4%,

beta = 1.3, wd =20%, rd = 9%.

rsL = rRF + (RPM)bTarget

= 7% + (4%)1.3 = 12.2%

rsU = wdrd + wsrsL

= 0.20(9%) + 0.80(12.2%)= 11.56%

Discount Rate Calculations

Page 27: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

27

Unlevered Horizon Value (Constant growth of 6%)

Unlevered Horizon Value =(FCF2014)(1+g)

rsU - g

= $21.94(1.06)0.1156 – 0.06

= $418.3 million.

Page 28: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

28

Unlevered Value

VUL = $11.7

(1.1156)1

$10.5

(1.1156)2+ + $16.5

(1.1156)3+ $20.7

(1.1156)4

= $298.9 million.

+ $440.2

(1.1156)5

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Free Cash Flow 11.7$ 10.5$ 16.5$ 20.7$ 21.94$ Unlevered Horizon Value 418.3$ Total 11.7$ 10.5$ 16.5$ 20.7$ 440.2$

Page 29: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

29

Unlevered Value

The unlevered value is the value of the firm’s operations if it had no debt. In this case Lyons’ operations would be worth $298.9 million if it were financed with 100% equity.

Page 30: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

30

Tax Shield Horizon Value

Tax Shield Horizon Value =(TS2014)(1+g)

rsU - g

= $3.26(1.06)0.1156 – 0.06

= $62.2 million.

Page 31: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

31

Tax Shield Value

VTS = $ 2.0

(1.1156)1

$ 2.6

(1.1156)2+ + $ 2.6

(1.1156)3+ $ 2.8

(1.1156)4

= $45.5 million.

+ $ 65.5

(1.1156)5

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Interest tax shield 2.0$ 2.6$ 2.6$ 2.8$ 3.264$ Tax shield horizon value 62.2$ Total 2.0$ 2.6$ 2.6$ 2.8$ 65.5$

Page 32: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

32

What Is the value of the Target Firm’s operations to the Acquiring Firm? (In Millions)

Value of operations = unlevered value + value of tax shield= 298.9 + 45.5 = $344.4 million

Page 33: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

33

What is the value of the Target’sequity?

The Target has $55 million in debt. Vops + non-operating assets – debt

= equity 344.4 million + 0 – 55 million =

$289.4 million = equity value of target to the acquirer.

Page 34: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

34

Would another potential acquirer obtain the same value?

No. The cash flow estimates would be different, both due to forecasting inaccuracies and to differential synergies.

Further, a different beta estimate, financing mix, or tax rate would change the discount rate.

Page 35: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

35

The Bid Price

Assume the target company has 20 million shares outstanding. The

stock last traded at $11 per share, which reflects the target’s value on a stand-alone basis. How much should the acquiring firm offer?

Page 36: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

36

Estimate of target’s value = $289.4 million

Target’s current value = $220.0 million

Merger premium = $ 69.4 million

Presumably, the target’s value is increased by $69.4 million due to merger synergies, although realizing such synergies has been problematic in many mergers.

(More...)

Page 37: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

37

The offer could range from $11 to $289.4/20 = $14.47 per share.

At $11, all merger benefits would go to the acquiring firm’s shareholders.

At $14.47, all value added would go to the target firm’s shareholders.

The graph on the next slide summarizes the situation.

Page 38: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

38

Change in Shareholders’ Wealth

Acquirer Target

Price Paid for Target

$11.00 $14.47

0 5 10 15 20

Bargaining Range = Synergy

Page 39: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

39

Points About Graph

Nothing magic about crossover price.

Actual price would be determined by bargaining. Higher if target is in better bargaining position, lower if acquirer is.

If target is good fit for many acquirers, other firms will come in, price will be bid up. If not, could be close to $11.

(More...)

Page 40: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

40

Acquirer might want to make high “preemptive” bid to ward off other bidders, or low bid and then plan to go up. Strategy is important.

Do target’s managers have 51% of stock and want to remain in control?

What kind of personal deal will target’s managers get?

Page 41: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

41

What if the Acquirer intended to increase the debt level in the Target to 40% with an interest rate of 10%?

Assume debt at the end of 2013 will be $221.6 million.

Free cash flows wouldn’t change Assume interest payments in short term

won’t change (if they did, it is easy to incorporate that difference). Interest in 2014 will change.

Interest2014 = 0.10(221.6) = $22.16 million

Tax Shield2014 = 22.16(0.40) = $8.864 million

Page 42: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

42

New Tax Shield Horizon Value Calculation

Tax Shield Horizon Value =(TS2014)(1+g)

rsU - g

= $8.864(1.06)0.1156 – 0.06

= $169.0 million.

Page 43: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

43

New Tax Shield Value

VTS = $ 2.0

(1.1156)1

$ 2.6

(1.1156)2+ + $ 2.6

(1.1156)3+ $ 2.8

(1.1156)4

= $110.5 million.

+ $177.9

(1.1156)5

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Interest tax shield 2.0$ 2.6$ 2.6$ 2.8$ 8.864$ Tax shield horizon value 169.0$ Total 2.0$ 2.6$ 2.6$ 2.8$ 177.9$

Page 44: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

44

Increase in Tax Shield

The old tax shield value was $45.5 million when the company was financed with 20% debt.

When the company is financed with 40% debt, the tax shield value increases to $110.5 million. The increase is due to the larger interest deductions.

Page 45: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

45

New Vops and Vequity

Value of operations = unlevered value + value of tax shield= 298.9 + 110.5 = $409.4 million

Value of equity= Value of operations + non-operating assets – debt

Page 46: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

46

New Equity Value $409.4 million - 55 million =

$354.4 million This is $65 million, or $3.25 per

share more than if the horizon capital structure is 20% debt.

The added value is the value of the additional tax shield from the increased debt.

Page 47: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

47

Do mergers really create value? According to empirical evidence,

acquisitions do create value as a result of economies of scale, other synergies, and/or better management.

Shareholders of target firms reap most of the benefits, that is, the final price is close to full value. Target management can always say no. Competing bidders often push up prices.

Page 48: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

48

What method is used to account for mergers?

Pooling of interests is GONE. Only purchase accounting may be used now.

Page 49: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

49

Purchase Accounting

Purchase: The assets of the acquired firm are

“written up” to reflect purchase price if it is greater than the net asset value.

Goodwill is often created, which appears as an asset on the balance sheet.

Common equity account is increased to balance assets and claims.

Page 50: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

50

Goodwill Amortization Goodwill is NO LONGER amortized

over time for shareholder reporting.

Goodwill is subject to an annual “impairment test.” If its fair market value has declined, then goodwill is reduced. Otherwise it is not.

Goodwill is still amortized for Federal Tax purposes.

Page 51: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

51

What are some merger-related activities of investment bankers?

Identifying targets Arranging mergers Developing defensive tactics Establishing a fair value Financing mergers Arbitrage operations

Page 52: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

52

What is a leveraged buyout (LB0)? In an LBO, a small group of

investors, normally including management, buys all of the publicly held stock, and hence takes the firm private.

Purchase often financed with debt. After operating privately for a

number of years, investors take the firm public to “cash out.”

Page 53: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

53

What are the advantages and disadvantages of going private?

Advantages: Administrative cost savings Increased managerial incentives Increased managerial flexibility Increased shareholder participation

Disadvantages: Limited access to equity capital No way to capture return on

investment

Page 54: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

54

What are the major types of divestitures?

Sale of an entire subsidiary to another firm.

Spinning off a corporate subsidiary by giving the stock to existing shareholders.

Carving out a corporate subsidiary by selling a minority interest.

Outright liquidation of assets.

Page 55: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

55

What motivates firms to divest assets?

Subsidiary worth more to buyer than when operated by current owner.

To settle antitrust issues. Subsidiary’s value increased if it

operates independently. To change strategic direction. To shed money losers. To get needed cash when

distressed.

Page 56: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

56

What are holding companies?

A holding company is a corporation formed for the sole purpose of owning the stocks of other companies.

In a typical holding company, the subsidiary companies issue their own debt, but their equity is held by the holding company, which, in turn, sells stock to individual investors.

Page 57: 1 CHAPTER 26 Mergers, LBOs, Divestitures, and Holding Companies.

57

Advantages and Disadvantages of Holding Companies

Advantages: Control with fractional ownership. Isolation of risks.

Disadvantages: Partial multiple taxation. Ease of enforced dissolution.