1 Challenge the future Meng Wang Department of Transport & Planning Department of BioMechanical...
-
Upload
patricia-copeland -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Challenge the future Meng Wang Department of Transport & Planning Department of BioMechanical...
1Challenge the future
Meng WangDepartment of Transport amp Planning
Department of BioMechanical Engineering
Supervisor(s) Winnie Daamen Serge Hoogendoorn Bart van Arem
Generic Model Predictive Control Framework for
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)
Controller design for autonomous and cooperative driving and impact assessment on traffic flow dynamics
2Challenge the future
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
bull Support drivers in performing driving tasks in (partially)
automated vehicles
bull Autonomous systems eg Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC)
bull Rely solely on on-board sensors
bull No cooperation in the decision-making
bull Cooperative systems eg Cooperative ACC (CACC)
bull Exchange information via V2VV2I communication
bull Coordination and consensus in decision-making
3Challenge the future
Relevant for traffic management
ADAS may have far-reaching impacts on
bullIndividual driver behaviour car-following and lane-changing
consequently travel time safety and comfort
bullCollective traffic flow characteristics capacity stability
bullSustainability fuel consumption and emissions
It is important to design ADAS to improve collective traffic flow dynamics
4Challenge the future
A flexible design approach
bull Motivation many control approaches determine ACCC-ACC accelerations based on simple linear feedback control law
bull Approaches often miss certain desirable features such asbull Explicit optimisationbull Multiple objectivesbull Anticipation on (future) driving contextbull Integration with current traffic management architecture
(V2I)
bull Goal to develop a generic multi-objective control approach based on MPC (Model Predictive Control) while being fast and robust enough for real-time application
5Challenge the future
On-board system
On-board sensors
V2VampV2I Comm
State estimation amp prediction
Optimization at vehicle level
Reference control signal
Vehicle maneuver
Local traffic system
Other sensors
Vehicle actuactor
tk
tk+1
Predicting dynamic behaviour ofbullcontrolled vehiclesbullsurrounding vehicle(s) using human behaviour models
Autonomousnon-cooperative optimisation of own costCooperative system joint optimisation of total costs
[0 ) safety efficiecy comfort fuelargmin
pT J J J J u
Acceleration
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems Part I Mathematical formulation and non-cooperative systems Transportation Research Part C 201440 pp 271-289
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems Part II Cooperative sensing and cooperative control Transportation Research Part C 201440 pp 290-311
6Challenge the future
Worked examplesLayout Objectives FeatureACC (1) Maximise safety by
penalising approaching leader at small gaps(2) Maximise efficiency by penalising deviation from desired speedgap (3) Maximise comfort by penalising large accelerations and braking
Anticipation of leader behaviourFull speed range
EcoACC Basic ACC objectives +Minimise fuel consumption and emissions
Anticipation of leader behaviourEco-driving concept
C-ACC in homogeneous platoon
Maximise safety efficiency and comfort for all cooperative vehicles
Anticipation of leader behaviourExchange predicted state and control information
C-ACC in mixed platoon Maximise safety efficiency and comfort for the cooperative vehicle and its follower(s)
Anticipation of leader behaviourPrediction of follower behaviour using imperfect car-following modelNo V2V communication needed
Δx Δv
ACC leader
Δx2 Δv2
Wireless com
C-ACCC-ACC
Δx1 Δv1
Follower 2 -Human-driven
vehicle
Follower 1-Cooperative vehicle
Leader ndash Human-driven
vehicle
s1 Δv1 s2 Δv2
Δx Δv
EcoACC leader
7Challenge the future
Traffic flow fundamental diagram
bull ACC (Efficient-driving) vs EcoACC (Eco-driving)
bull Single lane simulation homogeneous vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Potential impacts of ecological adaptive cruise control systems on traffic and environment IET Intelligent Transport Systems 2014 8 pp 77-86
8Challenge the future
ACC string stability regions
Homogeneous traffic flow stability
M Wang M Treiber W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Modelling supported driving as an optimal control cycle Framework and model characteristics Transportation Research Part C 2013 36 pp 547-563
S Stable CU Convective upstream instabilityA Absolute instabilityCD Convective downstream instability
Driving direction
Driving direction
Speed (kmh
)
Speed (kmh
)
9Challenge the future
Mixed traffic flow features
bull 2-lane motorway of 14 km more than 500 vehicles
bull Complex networked control problem distributed MPC algorithm
bull Temporary bottleneck by lowering speed limits to 50 kmh
bull Mixed human-driven and ACC vehicles
bull Mixed human-driven and C-ACC vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
10Challenge the future
Impacts of ACC on moving jams
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
11Challenge the future
Impacts of C-ACC
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
12Challenge the future
Connected traffic control and vehicle control
Scenarios of detected jams
of resolved jams
TTS (vehh)
Speed limits area (kmmin)
0 ACC without VSL
- - 5628 -
10 ACC without VSL
- - 4538 -
100 ACC without VSL
- - 4438 -
0 ACC with VSL
10 10 4750 752
10 ACC with VSL
10 10 4392 735
100 ACC with VSL
12 12 4417 599
M Wang et al Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves Journal of ITS 2015 (under review)
VSL Variable Speed LimitsTTS Total time spent in the network
ACC controller
Vehicle actuator
Vehicle system
On-board sensors
Disturbance
Reference vehicle acceleration
Traffic system with many vehicles
Local traffic measurements
VSL signals via V2I
VSL controller
Road-based sensors (Loop detectors etc)
Road-based actuators (VSL gantries)
Disturbance(demand etc)
13Challenge the future
Summary
bull A generic control design methodology for a variety of ADAS applications
bull Implementable algorithms for ACC and C-ACC controllers
bull Impacts of ACC and C-ACC systems on flow characteristics are substantial particularly in formation and propagation properties of moving jams
bull Proposed ACC and C-ACC systems mitigate congestion compared to human-driven vehicles
bull Connected variable speed limits control with ACC brings extra benefits
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
2Challenge the future
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
bull Support drivers in performing driving tasks in (partially)
automated vehicles
bull Autonomous systems eg Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC)
bull Rely solely on on-board sensors
bull No cooperation in the decision-making
bull Cooperative systems eg Cooperative ACC (CACC)
bull Exchange information via V2VV2I communication
bull Coordination and consensus in decision-making
3Challenge the future
Relevant for traffic management
ADAS may have far-reaching impacts on
bullIndividual driver behaviour car-following and lane-changing
consequently travel time safety and comfort
bullCollective traffic flow characteristics capacity stability
bullSustainability fuel consumption and emissions
It is important to design ADAS to improve collective traffic flow dynamics
4Challenge the future
A flexible design approach
bull Motivation many control approaches determine ACCC-ACC accelerations based on simple linear feedback control law
bull Approaches often miss certain desirable features such asbull Explicit optimisationbull Multiple objectivesbull Anticipation on (future) driving contextbull Integration with current traffic management architecture
(V2I)
bull Goal to develop a generic multi-objective control approach based on MPC (Model Predictive Control) while being fast and robust enough for real-time application
5Challenge the future
On-board system
On-board sensors
V2VampV2I Comm
State estimation amp prediction
Optimization at vehicle level
Reference control signal
Vehicle maneuver
Local traffic system
Other sensors
Vehicle actuactor
tk
tk+1
Predicting dynamic behaviour ofbullcontrolled vehiclesbullsurrounding vehicle(s) using human behaviour models
Autonomousnon-cooperative optimisation of own costCooperative system joint optimisation of total costs
[0 ) safety efficiecy comfort fuelargmin
pT J J J J u
Acceleration
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems Part I Mathematical formulation and non-cooperative systems Transportation Research Part C 201440 pp 271-289
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems Part II Cooperative sensing and cooperative control Transportation Research Part C 201440 pp 290-311
6Challenge the future
Worked examplesLayout Objectives FeatureACC (1) Maximise safety by
penalising approaching leader at small gaps(2) Maximise efficiency by penalising deviation from desired speedgap (3) Maximise comfort by penalising large accelerations and braking
Anticipation of leader behaviourFull speed range
EcoACC Basic ACC objectives +Minimise fuel consumption and emissions
Anticipation of leader behaviourEco-driving concept
C-ACC in homogeneous platoon
Maximise safety efficiency and comfort for all cooperative vehicles
Anticipation of leader behaviourExchange predicted state and control information
C-ACC in mixed platoon Maximise safety efficiency and comfort for the cooperative vehicle and its follower(s)
Anticipation of leader behaviourPrediction of follower behaviour using imperfect car-following modelNo V2V communication needed
Δx Δv
ACC leader
Δx2 Δv2
Wireless com
C-ACCC-ACC
Δx1 Δv1
Follower 2 -Human-driven
vehicle
Follower 1-Cooperative vehicle
Leader ndash Human-driven
vehicle
s1 Δv1 s2 Δv2
Δx Δv
EcoACC leader
7Challenge the future
Traffic flow fundamental diagram
bull ACC (Efficient-driving) vs EcoACC (Eco-driving)
bull Single lane simulation homogeneous vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Potential impacts of ecological adaptive cruise control systems on traffic and environment IET Intelligent Transport Systems 2014 8 pp 77-86
8Challenge the future
ACC string stability regions
Homogeneous traffic flow stability
M Wang M Treiber W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Modelling supported driving as an optimal control cycle Framework and model characteristics Transportation Research Part C 2013 36 pp 547-563
S Stable CU Convective upstream instabilityA Absolute instabilityCD Convective downstream instability
Driving direction
Driving direction
Speed (kmh
)
Speed (kmh
)
9Challenge the future
Mixed traffic flow features
bull 2-lane motorway of 14 km more than 500 vehicles
bull Complex networked control problem distributed MPC algorithm
bull Temporary bottleneck by lowering speed limits to 50 kmh
bull Mixed human-driven and ACC vehicles
bull Mixed human-driven and C-ACC vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
10Challenge the future
Impacts of ACC on moving jams
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
11Challenge the future
Impacts of C-ACC
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
12Challenge the future
Connected traffic control and vehicle control
Scenarios of detected jams
of resolved jams
TTS (vehh)
Speed limits area (kmmin)
0 ACC without VSL
- - 5628 -
10 ACC without VSL
- - 4538 -
100 ACC without VSL
- - 4438 -
0 ACC with VSL
10 10 4750 752
10 ACC with VSL
10 10 4392 735
100 ACC with VSL
12 12 4417 599
M Wang et al Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves Journal of ITS 2015 (under review)
VSL Variable Speed LimitsTTS Total time spent in the network
ACC controller
Vehicle actuator
Vehicle system
On-board sensors
Disturbance
Reference vehicle acceleration
Traffic system with many vehicles
Local traffic measurements
VSL signals via V2I
VSL controller
Road-based sensors (Loop detectors etc)
Road-based actuators (VSL gantries)
Disturbance(demand etc)
13Challenge the future
Summary
bull A generic control design methodology for a variety of ADAS applications
bull Implementable algorithms for ACC and C-ACC controllers
bull Impacts of ACC and C-ACC systems on flow characteristics are substantial particularly in formation and propagation properties of moving jams
bull Proposed ACC and C-ACC systems mitigate congestion compared to human-driven vehicles
bull Connected variable speed limits control with ACC brings extra benefits
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
3Challenge the future
Relevant for traffic management
ADAS may have far-reaching impacts on
bullIndividual driver behaviour car-following and lane-changing
consequently travel time safety and comfort
bullCollective traffic flow characteristics capacity stability
bullSustainability fuel consumption and emissions
It is important to design ADAS to improve collective traffic flow dynamics
4Challenge the future
A flexible design approach
bull Motivation many control approaches determine ACCC-ACC accelerations based on simple linear feedback control law
bull Approaches often miss certain desirable features such asbull Explicit optimisationbull Multiple objectivesbull Anticipation on (future) driving contextbull Integration with current traffic management architecture
(V2I)
bull Goal to develop a generic multi-objective control approach based on MPC (Model Predictive Control) while being fast and robust enough for real-time application
5Challenge the future
On-board system
On-board sensors
V2VampV2I Comm
State estimation amp prediction
Optimization at vehicle level
Reference control signal
Vehicle maneuver
Local traffic system
Other sensors
Vehicle actuactor
tk
tk+1
Predicting dynamic behaviour ofbullcontrolled vehiclesbullsurrounding vehicle(s) using human behaviour models
Autonomousnon-cooperative optimisation of own costCooperative system joint optimisation of total costs
[0 ) safety efficiecy comfort fuelargmin
pT J J J J u
Acceleration
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems Part I Mathematical formulation and non-cooperative systems Transportation Research Part C 201440 pp 271-289
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems Part II Cooperative sensing and cooperative control Transportation Research Part C 201440 pp 290-311
6Challenge the future
Worked examplesLayout Objectives FeatureACC (1) Maximise safety by
penalising approaching leader at small gaps(2) Maximise efficiency by penalising deviation from desired speedgap (3) Maximise comfort by penalising large accelerations and braking
Anticipation of leader behaviourFull speed range
EcoACC Basic ACC objectives +Minimise fuel consumption and emissions
Anticipation of leader behaviourEco-driving concept
C-ACC in homogeneous platoon
Maximise safety efficiency and comfort for all cooperative vehicles
Anticipation of leader behaviourExchange predicted state and control information
C-ACC in mixed platoon Maximise safety efficiency and comfort for the cooperative vehicle and its follower(s)
Anticipation of leader behaviourPrediction of follower behaviour using imperfect car-following modelNo V2V communication needed
Δx Δv
ACC leader
Δx2 Δv2
Wireless com
C-ACCC-ACC
Δx1 Δv1
Follower 2 -Human-driven
vehicle
Follower 1-Cooperative vehicle
Leader ndash Human-driven
vehicle
s1 Δv1 s2 Δv2
Δx Δv
EcoACC leader
7Challenge the future
Traffic flow fundamental diagram
bull ACC (Efficient-driving) vs EcoACC (Eco-driving)
bull Single lane simulation homogeneous vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Potential impacts of ecological adaptive cruise control systems on traffic and environment IET Intelligent Transport Systems 2014 8 pp 77-86
8Challenge the future
ACC string stability regions
Homogeneous traffic flow stability
M Wang M Treiber W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Modelling supported driving as an optimal control cycle Framework and model characteristics Transportation Research Part C 2013 36 pp 547-563
S Stable CU Convective upstream instabilityA Absolute instabilityCD Convective downstream instability
Driving direction
Driving direction
Speed (kmh
)
Speed (kmh
)
9Challenge the future
Mixed traffic flow features
bull 2-lane motorway of 14 km more than 500 vehicles
bull Complex networked control problem distributed MPC algorithm
bull Temporary bottleneck by lowering speed limits to 50 kmh
bull Mixed human-driven and ACC vehicles
bull Mixed human-driven and C-ACC vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
10Challenge the future
Impacts of ACC on moving jams
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
11Challenge the future
Impacts of C-ACC
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
12Challenge the future
Connected traffic control and vehicle control
Scenarios of detected jams
of resolved jams
TTS (vehh)
Speed limits area (kmmin)
0 ACC without VSL
- - 5628 -
10 ACC without VSL
- - 4538 -
100 ACC without VSL
- - 4438 -
0 ACC with VSL
10 10 4750 752
10 ACC with VSL
10 10 4392 735
100 ACC with VSL
12 12 4417 599
M Wang et al Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves Journal of ITS 2015 (under review)
VSL Variable Speed LimitsTTS Total time spent in the network
ACC controller
Vehicle actuator
Vehicle system
On-board sensors
Disturbance
Reference vehicle acceleration
Traffic system with many vehicles
Local traffic measurements
VSL signals via V2I
VSL controller
Road-based sensors (Loop detectors etc)
Road-based actuators (VSL gantries)
Disturbance(demand etc)
13Challenge the future
Summary
bull A generic control design methodology for a variety of ADAS applications
bull Implementable algorithms for ACC and C-ACC controllers
bull Impacts of ACC and C-ACC systems on flow characteristics are substantial particularly in formation and propagation properties of moving jams
bull Proposed ACC and C-ACC systems mitigate congestion compared to human-driven vehicles
bull Connected variable speed limits control with ACC brings extra benefits
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
4Challenge the future
A flexible design approach
bull Motivation many control approaches determine ACCC-ACC accelerations based on simple linear feedback control law
bull Approaches often miss certain desirable features such asbull Explicit optimisationbull Multiple objectivesbull Anticipation on (future) driving contextbull Integration with current traffic management architecture
(V2I)
bull Goal to develop a generic multi-objective control approach based on MPC (Model Predictive Control) while being fast and robust enough for real-time application
5Challenge the future
On-board system
On-board sensors
V2VampV2I Comm
State estimation amp prediction
Optimization at vehicle level
Reference control signal
Vehicle maneuver
Local traffic system
Other sensors
Vehicle actuactor
tk
tk+1
Predicting dynamic behaviour ofbullcontrolled vehiclesbullsurrounding vehicle(s) using human behaviour models
Autonomousnon-cooperative optimisation of own costCooperative system joint optimisation of total costs
[0 ) safety efficiecy comfort fuelargmin
pT J J J J u
Acceleration
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems Part I Mathematical formulation and non-cooperative systems Transportation Research Part C 201440 pp 271-289
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems Part II Cooperative sensing and cooperative control Transportation Research Part C 201440 pp 290-311
6Challenge the future
Worked examplesLayout Objectives FeatureACC (1) Maximise safety by
penalising approaching leader at small gaps(2) Maximise efficiency by penalising deviation from desired speedgap (3) Maximise comfort by penalising large accelerations and braking
Anticipation of leader behaviourFull speed range
EcoACC Basic ACC objectives +Minimise fuel consumption and emissions
Anticipation of leader behaviourEco-driving concept
C-ACC in homogeneous platoon
Maximise safety efficiency and comfort for all cooperative vehicles
Anticipation of leader behaviourExchange predicted state and control information
C-ACC in mixed platoon Maximise safety efficiency and comfort for the cooperative vehicle and its follower(s)
Anticipation of leader behaviourPrediction of follower behaviour using imperfect car-following modelNo V2V communication needed
Δx Δv
ACC leader
Δx2 Δv2
Wireless com
C-ACCC-ACC
Δx1 Δv1
Follower 2 -Human-driven
vehicle
Follower 1-Cooperative vehicle
Leader ndash Human-driven
vehicle
s1 Δv1 s2 Δv2
Δx Δv
EcoACC leader
7Challenge the future
Traffic flow fundamental diagram
bull ACC (Efficient-driving) vs EcoACC (Eco-driving)
bull Single lane simulation homogeneous vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Potential impacts of ecological adaptive cruise control systems on traffic and environment IET Intelligent Transport Systems 2014 8 pp 77-86
8Challenge the future
ACC string stability regions
Homogeneous traffic flow stability
M Wang M Treiber W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Modelling supported driving as an optimal control cycle Framework and model characteristics Transportation Research Part C 2013 36 pp 547-563
S Stable CU Convective upstream instabilityA Absolute instabilityCD Convective downstream instability
Driving direction
Driving direction
Speed (kmh
)
Speed (kmh
)
9Challenge the future
Mixed traffic flow features
bull 2-lane motorway of 14 km more than 500 vehicles
bull Complex networked control problem distributed MPC algorithm
bull Temporary bottleneck by lowering speed limits to 50 kmh
bull Mixed human-driven and ACC vehicles
bull Mixed human-driven and C-ACC vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
10Challenge the future
Impacts of ACC on moving jams
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
11Challenge the future
Impacts of C-ACC
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
12Challenge the future
Connected traffic control and vehicle control
Scenarios of detected jams
of resolved jams
TTS (vehh)
Speed limits area (kmmin)
0 ACC without VSL
- - 5628 -
10 ACC without VSL
- - 4538 -
100 ACC without VSL
- - 4438 -
0 ACC with VSL
10 10 4750 752
10 ACC with VSL
10 10 4392 735
100 ACC with VSL
12 12 4417 599
M Wang et al Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves Journal of ITS 2015 (under review)
VSL Variable Speed LimitsTTS Total time spent in the network
ACC controller
Vehicle actuator
Vehicle system
On-board sensors
Disturbance
Reference vehicle acceleration
Traffic system with many vehicles
Local traffic measurements
VSL signals via V2I
VSL controller
Road-based sensors (Loop detectors etc)
Road-based actuators (VSL gantries)
Disturbance(demand etc)
13Challenge the future
Summary
bull A generic control design methodology for a variety of ADAS applications
bull Implementable algorithms for ACC and C-ACC controllers
bull Impacts of ACC and C-ACC systems on flow characteristics are substantial particularly in formation and propagation properties of moving jams
bull Proposed ACC and C-ACC systems mitigate congestion compared to human-driven vehicles
bull Connected variable speed limits control with ACC brings extra benefits
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
5Challenge the future
On-board system
On-board sensors
V2VampV2I Comm
State estimation amp prediction
Optimization at vehicle level
Reference control signal
Vehicle maneuver
Local traffic system
Other sensors
Vehicle actuactor
tk
tk+1
Predicting dynamic behaviour ofbullcontrolled vehiclesbullsurrounding vehicle(s) using human behaviour models
Autonomousnon-cooperative optimisation of own costCooperative system joint optimisation of total costs
[0 ) safety efficiecy comfort fuelargmin
pT J J J J u
Acceleration
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems Part I Mathematical formulation and non-cooperative systems Transportation Research Part C 201440 pp 271-289
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems Part II Cooperative sensing and cooperative control Transportation Research Part C 201440 pp 290-311
6Challenge the future
Worked examplesLayout Objectives FeatureACC (1) Maximise safety by
penalising approaching leader at small gaps(2) Maximise efficiency by penalising deviation from desired speedgap (3) Maximise comfort by penalising large accelerations and braking
Anticipation of leader behaviourFull speed range
EcoACC Basic ACC objectives +Minimise fuel consumption and emissions
Anticipation of leader behaviourEco-driving concept
C-ACC in homogeneous platoon
Maximise safety efficiency and comfort for all cooperative vehicles
Anticipation of leader behaviourExchange predicted state and control information
C-ACC in mixed platoon Maximise safety efficiency and comfort for the cooperative vehicle and its follower(s)
Anticipation of leader behaviourPrediction of follower behaviour using imperfect car-following modelNo V2V communication needed
Δx Δv
ACC leader
Δx2 Δv2
Wireless com
C-ACCC-ACC
Δx1 Δv1
Follower 2 -Human-driven
vehicle
Follower 1-Cooperative vehicle
Leader ndash Human-driven
vehicle
s1 Δv1 s2 Δv2
Δx Δv
EcoACC leader
7Challenge the future
Traffic flow fundamental diagram
bull ACC (Efficient-driving) vs EcoACC (Eco-driving)
bull Single lane simulation homogeneous vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Potential impacts of ecological adaptive cruise control systems on traffic and environment IET Intelligent Transport Systems 2014 8 pp 77-86
8Challenge the future
ACC string stability regions
Homogeneous traffic flow stability
M Wang M Treiber W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Modelling supported driving as an optimal control cycle Framework and model characteristics Transportation Research Part C 2013 36 pp 547-563
S Stable CU Convective upstream instabilityA Absolute instabilityCD Convective downstream instability
Driving direction
Driving direction
Speed (kmh
)
Speed (kmh
)
9Challenge the future
Mixed traffic flow features
bull 2-lane motorway of 14 km more than 500 vehicles
bull Complex networked control problem distributed MPC algorithm
bull Temporary bottleneck by lowering speed limits to 50 kmh
bull Mixed human-driven and ACC vehicles
bull Mixed human-driven and C-ACC vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
10Challenge the future
Impacts of ACC on moving jams
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
11Challenge the future
Impacts of C-ACC
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
12Challenge the future
Connected traffic control and vehicle control
Scenarios of detected jams
of resolved jams
TTS (vehh)
Speed limits area (kmmin)
0 ACC without VSL
- - 5628 -
10 ACC without VSL
- - 4538 -
100 ACC without VSL
- - 4438 -
0 ACC with VSL
10 10 4750 752
10 ACC with VSL
10 10 4392 735
100 ACC with VSL
12 12 4417 599
M Wang et al Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves Journal of ITS 2015 (under review)
VSL Variable Speed LimitsTTS Total time spent in the network
ACC controller
Vehicle actuator
Vehicle system
On-board sensors
Disturbance
Reference vehicle acceleration
Traffic system with many vehicles
Local traffic measurements
VSL signals via V2I
VSL controller
Road-based sensors (Loop detectors etc)
Road-based actuators (VSL gantries)
Disturbance(demand etc)
13Challenge the future
Summary
bull A generic control design methodology for a variety of ADAS applications
bull Implementable algorithms for ACC and C-ACC controllers
bull Impacts of ACC and C-ACC systems on flow characteristics are substantial particularly in formation and propagation properties of moving jams
bull Proposed ACC and C-ACC systems mitigate congestion compared to human-driven vehicles
bull Connected variable speed limits control with ACC brings extra benefits
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
6Challenge the future
Worked examplesLayout Objectives FeatureACC (1) Maximise safety by
penalising approaching leader at small gaps(2) Maximise efficiency by penalising deviation from desired speedgap (3) Maximise comfort by penalising large accelerations and braking
Anticipation of leader behaviourFull speed range
EcoACC Basic ACC objectives +Minimise fuel consumption and emissions
Anticipation of leader behaviourEco-driving concept
C-ACC in homogeneous platoon
Maximise safety efficiency and comfort for all cooperative vehicles
Anticipation of leader behaviourExchange predicted state and control information
C-ACC in mixed platoon Maximise safety efficiency and comfort for the cooperative vehicle and its follower(s)
Anticipation of leader behaviourPrediction of follower behaviour using imperfect car-following modelNo V2V communication needed
Δx Δv
ACC leader
Δx2 Δv2
Wireless com
C-ACCC-ACC
Δx1 Δv1
Follower 2 -Human-driven
vehicle
Follower 1-Cooperative vehicle
Leader ndash Human-driven
vehicle
s1 Δv1 s2 Δv2
Δx Δv
EcoACC leader
7Challenge the future
Traffic flow fundamental diagram
bull ACC (Efficient-driving) vs EcoACC (Eco-driving)
bull Single lane simulation homogeneous vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Potential impacts of ecological adaptive cruise control systems on traffic and environment IET Intelligent Transport Systems 2014 8 pp 77-86
8Challenge the future
ACC string stability regions
Homogeneous traffic flow stability
M Wang M Treiber W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Modelling supported driving as an optimal control cycle Framework and model characteristics Transportation Research Part C 2013 36 pp 547-563
S Stable CU Convective upstream instabilityA Absolute instabilityCD Convective downstream instability
Driving direction
Driving direction
Speed (kmh
)
Speed (kmh
)
9Challenge the future
Mixed traffic flow features
bull 2-lane motorway of 14 km more than 500 vehicles
bull Complex networked control problem distributed MPC algorithm
bull Temporary bottleneck by lowering speed limits to 50 kmh
bull Mixed human-driven and ACC vehicles
bull Mixed human-driven and C-ACC vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
10Challenge the future
Impacts of ACC on moving jams
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
11Challenge the future
Impacts of C-ACC
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
12Challenge the future
Connected traffic control and vehicle control
Scenarios of detected jams
of resolved jams
TTS (vehh)
Speed limits area (kmmin)
0 ACC without VSL
- - 5628 -
10 ACC without VSL
- - 4538 -
100 ACC without VSL
- - 4438 -
0 ACC with VSL
10 10 4750 752
10 ACC with VSL
10 10 4392 735
100 ACC with VSL
12 12 4417 599
M Wang et al Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves Journal of ITS 2015 (under review)
VSL Variable Speed LimitsTTS Total time spent in the network
ACC controller
Vehicle actuator
Vehicle system
On-board sensors
Disturbance
Reference vehicle acceleration
Traffic system with many vehicles
Local traffic measurements
VSL signals via V2I
VSL controller
Road-based sensors (Loop detectors etc)
Road-based actuators (VSL gantries)
Disturbance(demand etc)
13Challenge the future
Summary
bull A generic control design methodology for a variety of ADAS applications
bull Implementable algorithms for ACC and C-ACC controllers
bull Impacts of ACC and C-ACC systems on flow characteristics are substantial particularly in formation and propagation properties of moving jams
bull Proposed ACC and C-ACC systems mitigate congestion compared to human-driven vehicles
bull Connected variable speed limits control with ACC brings extra benefits
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
7Challenge the future
Traffic flow fundamental diagram
bull ACC (Efficient-driving) vs EcoACC (Eco-driving)
bull Single lane simulation homogeneous vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Potential impacts of ecological adaptive cruise control systems on traffic and environment IET Intelligent Transport Systems 2014 8 pp 77-86
8Challenge the future
ACC string stability regions
Homogeneous traffic flow stability
M Wang M Treiber W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Modelling supported driving as an optimal control cycle Framework and model characteristics Transportation Research Part C 2013 36 pp 547-563
S Stable CU Convective upstream instabilityA Absolute instabilityCD Convective downstream instability
Driving direction
Driving direction
Speed (kmh
)
Speed (kmh
)
9Challenge the future
Mixed traffic flow features
bull 2-lane motorway of 14 km more than 500 vehicles
bull Complex networked control problem distributed MPC algorithm
bull Temporary bottleneck by lowering speed limits to 50 kmh
bull Mixed human-driven and ACC vehicles
bull Mixed human-driven and C-ACC vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
10Challenge the future
Impacts of ACC on moving jams
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
11Challenge the future
Impacts of C-ACC
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
12Challenge the future
Connected traffic control and vehicle control
Scenarios of detected jams
of resolved jams
TTS (vehh)
Speed limits area (kmmin)
0 ACC without VSL
- - 5628 -
10 ACC without VSL
- - 4538 -
100 ACC without VSL
- - 4438 -
0 ACC with VSL
10 10 4750 752
10 ACC with VSL
10 10 4392 735
100 ACC with VSL
12 12 4417 599
M Wang et al Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves Journal of ITS 2015 (under review)
VSL Variable Speed LimitsTTS Total time spent in the network
ACC controller
Vehicle actuator
Vehicle system
On-board sensors
Disturbance
Reference vehicle acceleration
Traffic system with many vehicles
Local traffic measurements
VSL signals via V2I
VSL controller
Road-based sensors (Loop detectors etc)
Road-based actuators (VSL gantries)
Disturbance(demand etc)
13Challenge the future
Summary
bull A generic control design methodology for a variety of ADAS applications
bull Implementable algorithms for ACC and C-ACC controllers
bull Impacts of ACC and C-ACC systems on flow characteristics are substantial particularly in formation and propagation properties of moving jams
bull Proposed ACC and C-ACC systems mitigate congestion compared to human-driven vehicles
bull Connected variable speed limits control with ACC brings extra benefits
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
8Challenge the future
ACC string stability regions
Homogeneous traffic flow stability
M Wang M Treiber W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Modelling supported driving as an optimal control cycle Framework and model characteristics Transportation Research Part C 2013 36 pp 547-563
S Stable CU Convective upstream instabilityA Absolute instabilityCD Convective downstream instability
Driving direction
Driving direction
Speed (kmh
)
Speed (kmh
)
9Challenge the future
Mixed traffic flow features
bull 2-lane motorway of 14 km more than 500 vehicles
bull Complex networked control problem distributed MPC algorithm
bull Temporary bottleneck by lowering speed limits to 50 kmh
bull Mixed human-driven and ACC vehicles
bull Mixed human-driven and C-ACC vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
10Challenge the future
Impacts of ACC on moving jams
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
11Challenge the future
Impacts of C-ACC
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
12Challenge the future
Connected traffic control and vehicle control
Scenarios of detected jams
of resolved jams
TTS (vehh)
Speed limits area (kmmin)
0 ACC without VSL
- - 5628 -
10 ACC without VSL
- - 4538 -
100 ACC without VSL
- - 4438 -
0 ACC with VSL
10 10 4750 752
10 ACC with VSL
10 10 4392 735
100 ACC with VSL
12 12 4417 599
M Wang et al Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves Journal of ITS 2015 (under review)
VSL Variable Speed LimitsTTS Total time spent in the network
ACC controller
Vehicle actuator
Vehicle system
On-board sensors
Disturbance
Reference vehicle acceleration
Traffic system with many vehicles
Local traffic measurements
VSL signals via V2I
VSL controller
Road-based sensors (Loop detectors etc)
Road-based actuators (VSL gantries)
Disturbance(demand etc)
13Challenge the future
Summary
bull A generic control design methodology for a variety of ADAS applications
bull Implementable algorithms for ACC and C-ACC controllers
bull Impacts of ACC and C-ACC systems on flow characteristics are substantial particularly in formation and propagation properties of moving jams
bull Proposed ACC and C-ACC systems mitigate congestion compared to human-driven vehicles
bull Connected variable speed limits control with ACC brings extra benefits
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
9Challenge the future
Mixed traffic flow features
bull 2-lane motorway of 14 km more than 500 vehicles
bull Complex networked control problem distributed MPC algorithm
bull Temporary bottleneck by lowering speed limits to 50 kmh
bull Mixed human-driven and ACC vehicles
bull Mixed human-driven and C-ACC vehicles
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
10Challenge the future
Impacts of ACC on moving jams
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
11Challenge the future
Impacts of C-ACC
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
12Challenge the future
Connected traffic control and vehicle control
Scenarios of detected jams
of resolved jams
TTS (vehh)
Speed limits area (kmmin)
0 ACC without VSL
- - 5628 -
10 ACC without VSL
- - 4538 -
100 ACC without VSL
- - 4438 -
0 ACC with VSL
10 10 4750 752
10 ACC with VSL
10 10 4392 735
100 ACC with VSL
12 12 4417 599
M Wang et al Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves Journal of ITS 2015 (under review)
VSL Variable Speed LimitsTTS Total time spent in the network
ACC controller
Vehicle actuator
Vehicle system
On-board sensors
Disturbance
Reference vehicle acceleration
Traffic system with many vehicles
Local traffic measurements
VSL signals via V2I
VSL controller
Road-based sensors (Loop detectors etc)
Road-based actuators (VSL gantries)
Disturbance(demand etc)
13Challenge the future
Summary
bull A generic control design methodology for a variety of ADAS applications
bull Implementable algorithms for ACC and C-ACC controllers
bull Impacts of ACC and C-ACC systems on flow characteristics are substantial particularly in formation and propagation properties of moving jams
bull Proposed ACC and C-ACC systems mitigate congestion compared to human-driven vehicles
bull Connected variable speed limits control with ACC brings extra benefits
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
10Challenge the future
Impacts of ACC on moving jams
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
11Challenge the future
Impacts of C-ACC
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
12Challenge the future
Connected traffic control and vehicle control
Scenarios of detected jams
of resolved jams
TTS (vehh)
Speed limits area (kmmin)
0 ACC without VSL
- - 5628 -
10 ACC without VSL
- - 4538 -
100 ACC without VSL
- - 4438 -
0 ACC with VSL
10 10 4750 752
10 ACC with VSL
10 10 4392 735
100 ACC with VSL
12 12 4417 599
M Wang et al Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves Journal of ITS 2015 (under review)
VSL Variable Speed LimitsTTS Total time spent in the network
ACC controller
Vehicle actuator
Vehicle system
On-board sensors
Disturbance
Reference vehicle acceleration
Traffic system with many vehicles
Local traffic measurements
VSL signals via V2I
VSL controller
Road-based sensors (Loop detectors etc)
Road-based actuators (VSL gantries)
Disturbance(demand etc)
13Challenge the future
Summary
bull A generic control design methodology for a variety of ADAS applications
bull Implementable algorithms for ACC and C-ACC controllers
bull Impacts of ACC and C-ACC systems on flow characteristics are substantial particularly in formation and propagation properties of moving jams
bull Proposed ACC and C-ACC systems mitigate congestion compared to human-driven vehicles
bull Connected variable speed limits control with ACC brings extra benefits
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
11Challenge the future
Impacts of C-ACC
M Wang W Daamen SP Hoogendoorn B van Arem Cooperative car-following control distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features IEEE transactions on ITS 2015 (under review)
Driving direction
Driving direction
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
Flow (vehh)
Speed (kmh)
12Challenge the future
Connected traffic control and vehicle control
Scenarios of detected jams
of resolved jams
TTS (vehh)
Speed limits area (kmmin)
0 ACC without VSL
- - 5628 -
10 ACC without VSL
- - 4538 -
100 ACC without VSL
- - 4438 -
0 ACC with VSL
10 10 4750 752
10 ACC with VSL
10 10 4392 735
100 ACC with VSL
12 12 4417 599
M Wang et al Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves Journal of ITS 2015 (under review)
VSL Variable Speed LimitsTTS Total time spent in the network
ACC controller
Vehicle actuator
Vehicle system
On-board sensors
Disturbance
Reference vehicle acceleration
Traffic system with many vehicles
Local traffic measurements
VSL signals via V2I
VSL controller
Road-based sensors (Loop detectors etc)
Road-based actuators (VSL gantries)
Disturbance(demand etc)
13Challenge the future
Summary
bull A generic control design methodology for a variety of ADAS applications
bull Implementable algorithms for ACC and C-ACC controllers
bull Impacts of ACC and C-ACC systems on flow characteristics are substantial particularly in formation and propagation properties of moving jams
bull Proposed ACC and C-ACC systems mitigate congestion compared to human-driven vehicles
bull Connected variable speed limits control with ACC brings extra benefits
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
12Challenge the future
Connected traffic control and vehicle control
Scenarios of detected jams
of resolved jams
TTS (vehh)
Speed limits area (kmmin)
0 ACC without VSL
- - 5628 -
10 ACC without VSL
- - 4538 -
100 ACC without VSL
- - 4438 -
0 ACC with VSL
10 10 4750 752
10 ACC with VSL
10 10 4392 735
100 ACC with VSL
12 12 4417 599
M Wang et al Connected variable speed limits control and car-following control with vehicle-infrastructure communication to resolve stop-and-go waves Journal of ITS 2015 (under review)
VSL Variable Speed LimitsTTS Total time spent in the network
ACC controller
Vehicle actuator
Vehicle system
On-board sensors
Disturbance
Reference vehicle acceleration
Traffic system with many vehicles
Local traffic measurements
VSL signals via V2I
VSL controller
Road-based sensors (Loop detectors etc)
Road-based actuators (VSL gantries)
Disturbance(demand etc)
13Challenge the future
Summary
bull A generic control design methodology for a variety of ADAS applications
bull Implementable algorithms for ACC and C-ACC controllers
bull Impacts of ACC and C-ACC systems on flow characteristics are substantial particularly in formation and propagation properties of moving jams
bull Proposed ACC and C-ACC systems mitigate congestion compared to human-driven vehicles
bull Connected variable speed limits control with ACC brings extra benefits
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
13Challenge the future
Summary
bull A generic control design methodology for a variety of ADAS applications
bull Implementable algorithms for ACC and C-ACC controllers
bull Impacts of ACC and C-ACC systems on flow characteristics are substantial particularly in formation and propagation properties of moving jams
bull Proposed ACC and C-ACC systems mitigate congestion compared to human-driven vehicles
bull Connected variable speed limits control with ACC brings extra benefits
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
14Challenge the future
Still challenginghellip
bull Delay and inaccuracy in the loopbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem B Shyrokau and R
Happee Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of autonomous vehicle platoons Submitted to 2016 Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB)
bull Cooperative merging and lane changing controlbull M Wang SP Hoogendoorn W Daamen B van Arem and R Happee
Game theoretic approach for predictive lane-changing and car-following control Transportation Research Part C 2015 58 pp73-92
bull Human factors driverrsquos role in the futurebull Supervising resume control safety concern
bull Impact assessmentbull Are microscopic traffic simulation models capable for the job
bull Cooperative traffic managementbull Refine or redesign current traffic management systems
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you
15Challenge the future
Meng Wangmwangtudelftnlwwwmengwangeu
Thank you