1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Steve Hulbert, for John Hill CFAC May 8, 2007 Experimental...

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Steve Hulbert, for John Hill CFAC May 8, 2007

Experimental Facilities Update


Outline

• XFD beamline overview

• XFD activities since last CFAC meeting• Lehman review

• Stability

• Schedule


NSLS-II Beamlines

• 15 five m straights for user undulators• Could potentially drive up to 30 beamlines by canting two undulators

• 4 eight m straights for user undulators• Could potentially drive up to 8 beamlines by canting two undulators

• 8 eight m straights for user damping wigglers• Could potentially drive up to 16 beamlines by canting two DWs

• 24 BM ports for UV and soft X-rays

• 6 BM ports for IR• 3 large aperture for far-IR• 3 regular aperture for mid/near-IR

At least 57 beamlinesMore w/ multiple IDs per straight

Multiple hutches per beamline are also possible


Beamlines

BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

IR hutch BM line

Soft x-ray Undulator line(8m straight)

BM line

Hard x-ray Undulator line(5m straight)

hard x-ray Undulator line(8m straight)

Soft x-ray Undulator line(8m straight)

Remote endstations

Hard x-ray Undulator line(5m straight)


Beamlines

SuperconductingMagnet

NSLS IIExperimental floor

Conceptual or pre-conceptual designs exist for a number of beamlines:

• Inelastic X-ray Scattering• Nanoprobe• Hard x-ray Coherent scattering• Soft x-ray Imaging and coherent scattering• Soft x-ray resonant elastic and inelastic scattering• High magnetic field • High Energy • Small Angle X-ray Scattering• Infra-Red • Imaging• Damping Wigglers• Protein Crystallography• Electron Spectroscopy• Bending Magnet


Long Beamlines

Heavy access doorUtilities tray

Optical pipe

X-ray beamline

Airlock

X-ray enclosure


Preliminary Insertion Device Usage at NSLS-IIID TYPE Device Beamline type

1 5m U19 IXS: 0.1 meV + 1 meV2 8m RF -3 5m U19 IXS: 50 meV4 8m RF -5 5m EPU 45 Soft x-ray: Scattering and RIXS6 8m EPU100 PES and LEEM/PEEM7 5m U19 Optics R+D and Machine diagnostics8 8m DW OPEN9 5m EPU 45 Soft x-ray: coherent scattering and imaging10 8m DW White beam Laue (time resolved)11 5m U19 Nanoprobe

12 8m U19 X 3m Hard x-ray Coherent scattering/SAXS

13 5m U19 Hard x-ray imaging

14 8m U19 x 3m Liquid interfaces/GISAXS + SAXS

15 5m U19 High Magnetic Field16 8m DW Powder + Powder17 5m U19 Microdiffraction18 8m DW Topography19 5m U19 Resonant scattering and surface diffraction20 8m DW EXAFS + EXAFS21 5m U19 Time resolved materials science22 8m SCW High energy: High Pressure23 5m SCW High energy: PDF24 8m DW OPEN25 5m OPEN OPEN26 8m DW PX 1, 227 5m U19 PX 328 8m DW X-ray Footprinting29 5m U19 PX 430 8m Injection -

Physical Science Beamlines

• 6 project beamlines in red

• 16 MIE beamlines in blue

Estimate that these 22 beamlines could accommodate ~ 1300 users

Life Science Beamlines

• 5 other funded beamlines

Three straights left unassigned


Possible Bending Magnet Usage at NSLS-II1 large IR-BM2 soft BM3 std IR BM4 3-pole wiggler5 3-pole wiggler6 3-pole wiggler7 large IR-BM8 3-pole wiggler9 std IR BM

10 3-pole wiggler11 3-pole wiggler12 3-pole wiggler13 large IR-BM14 soft BM15 std IR BM16 3-pole wiggler17 soft BM18 soft BM19 large IR-BM20 3-pole wiggler21 std IR BM22 3-pole wiggler23 3-pole wiggler24 3-pole wiggler25 large IR-BM26 3-pole wiggler27 std IR BM28 3-pole wiggler29 3-pole wiggler30 3-pole wiggler

mid-IR microprobe 2PX (X26C)radiometry

DEI, X-ray optics (X15A)

topography (X19C endstation)PX (X25)

far-IR microprobePX (X29)

mid-IR, far-IR high P (U2A)hard EXAFS (X18B)

UVU CD hard EXAFS (X11A)

mid-IR imaging (U10B)powder diffraction (X7B)tender-EXAFS (X19A)

soft x-ray spectroscopy/NEXAFS (U7A endstation, X1 beamline)

microdiffraction (X20/X13B)hard x-ray full field imaging

Far-IR 2soft x-ray full field imaging (parts from X1A, rest new)

far-IR spectroscopy (U12IR)SAXS (X27C)

mid-IR microprobe-2microprobe (X26A/X27A)

mid-IR microprobe-1 (U10A)R+D beamline

single crystal scattering (X21)SXMCD (U4B/X13A)

Magnetospectroscopy and time-resolved far-IROPEN

“Beamline types” in red are beamlines to be moved over from NSLS

Note: there is not always a 1:1 correspondence with beamlines at NSLS and NSLS-II. In some cases, equipment may be taken from multiple beamlines.


“Lehman” CD-1 Review, December 2006

1) R+D program is appropriate2) Funding for beamlines not sufficient to demonstrate unique

capabilities of NSLS-II or meet user demand.3) Include beam diagnostic BM beamline as part of the project4) Include mirror metrology R+D in the project5) Develop beamline access policy in which facility has the

responsibility for design, construction and operation of all beamlines.

6) Establish collaborations for design, testing of BL components.

Overall, the review was very positive in regard to the NSLS-II design and team. Recommended an increase in cost range to $750-900M

For XFD:


Recent Activities

• Explored use and impact of the addition of a few extended straight sections (up to 16m).

• Work on user requirements for stability – part of Stability Task Force and workshop (April 18-20).• Complex issue. Bottom line for 1nm and 0.1meV*: 10%

stability goal for electron beam seems compatible with experiments, if supplemented by state-of-the-art beamline feedback (will require some detector R+D).

* w/o feedback, IXS (0.1 meV res’n) needs 0.25 rad vertical angular stability (10% = 0.7 rad)

• Some techniques, e.g. IR and PX, need horiz. beam position stability <10% of horiz. beam size. Feedback probably req’d.


Recent Activities, continued

• Chose 6 Project Beamlines• Present to EFAC and Users next month,• Reworking schedule in light of this decision

• User meeting set: July 17th 2007• Present design and solicit feedback and input• Discuss project BLs• Discuss transition from NSLS to NSLS-II

• Lab space identified for R+D activities.


Noise and Stability

One issue users care a lot about is noise:

• Mechanical• Isolate sources of noise• Pay attention to vibration damping (thick slab)

• Electrical• Clean (conditioned) power• Dirty power• High quality grounds for each

• RFI• Shield from NEXRAD• Shield local sources (Storage Ring RF cavities)


Tentative schedule for project beamline activities

Determine High Level BL Specifications 01-Oct-07 to 01-May-08Decide Insertion Device for BL 01-Oct-07 to 01-May-08Conceptual Design of Project Beamlines 01-Oct-07 to 01-May-09Submit Conceptual Design to Facility and to EFAC 01-May-09Technical Design of Project Beamlines 04-May-09 to 01-Sep-10Submission of 100% Technical Design to Facility and to EFAC01-Sep-10Procurement of Major Beamline Components 16-Mar-11 to 12-Aug-11Contracts Awarded for Major Components 12-Aug-11Fabrication of Major Components 15-Aug-11 to 14-May-12Installation of FOE Hutch 16-Jan-12 to 01-May-12Install of Monochromatic Hutches 13-Feb-12 to 31-Aug-12Testing of Major Beamline Components 14-Mar-12 to 29-Aug-12Beneficial Occupancy of FOE Hutch 01-May-12Install BL Hardware into Hutches 02-May-12 to 01-Nov-12Delivery of Major Components to Site 14-May-12Testing on all Major Components Complete 29-Aug-12Beneficial Occupancy of Monochromatic Hutches 31-Aug-12Beamline Hardware in place, Ready for Beam 01-Nov-12Commissioning Beamline components without Beam 02-Nov-12 to 01-Apr-13Beam Commissioning of FOE Components 18-Jun-13 to 12-Aug-13Beam Delivered to Endstation 1 of BL1 12-Aug-13Commissioning of Endstation 1 13-Aug-13 to 13-Feb-14


Tentative schedule for project beamlines (con’d)

• Must complete installation and non-beam commissioning of all 6 project beamlines in 12 months.• Beneficial occupancy

– FOE: May 2012– Monochromatic hutches: Aug. 2012

• Commissioning of all project beamlines– Aug. 2013 to Feb. 2014

• Beamline timelines are realistic, but are very tight, with no float. Beamlines will be waiting for Beneficial Occupancy of the ring floor, FOE, and mono. hutches.

• Schedule Task Group is coordinating XFD requirements with CFD and ASD schedules.

• Hiring of XFD Interface Manager is underway.


Summary

• Lehman review recommendations resulted in an earlier and more robust beamline program

• Beamline program is dependent on CFD for:• Timely availability of experimental floor and utility services• Facility that meets stability requirements• LOB’s that support User program and staff beamline lab and office needs

• CFD is dependent on timely design and development of beamline facility requirements for incorporation in CFD design and construction documents

• These schedule dependencies are actively being coordinated in a schedule task group that meets weekly

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Steve Hulbert, for John Hill CFAC May 8, 2007 Experimental...

Documents

Transcript of 1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Steve Hulbert, for John Hill CFAC May 8, 2007 Experimental...