1 Access to Justice Data Research Data Centres & Real Time Remote Access Kathy AuCoin Chief Data...
-
Upload
dustin-preston -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
1
Transcript of 1 Access to Justice Data Research Data Centres & Real Time Remote Access Kathy AuCoin Chief Data...
1
Access to Justice Data
Research Data Centres & Real Time Remote Access
Kathy AuCoin
Chief Data Access and Data Development
August 2013
New CANSIM Tables
March 2012 – 45 CANSIM tables As of July 2013 –100+ CANSIM tables Civil Courts data tables Police Resources data tables – municipal level Detailed Criminal Offences and Crime Severity
Index by municipality
2
Additional CANSIM Tables2013/2014
Legal Aid Data Tables
Additional Police Resources Data
Homicide by region
Intimate partner homicides
Hate Crime and Cybercrime data3
Justice Files
Files currently available in RDC & RTRA
o Uniform Crime Reporting Incident Based Survey
o Homicide Survey
Additional files for RDC/RTRA by 2014-2015
o Hate Crime Supplemento Integrated Criminal Courts Survey
4
Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Incident Based Survey
Measures the incidence of police reported crime in Canada
Close to 100% coverage, national, provincial, CMA and non CMA
UCR generates micro data for the purposes of examining characteristics of victims, accused and incidents
5
UCR Incident Based Survey
Captures data on more than 200 Criminal Code offences
Violent crime Violations causing death, sexual & physical assaults, robbery,
extortion, violations resulting in the deprivation of freedom
Property Crimes Arson, break & enter, shoplifting, mischief
Other Crimes Impaired driving, prostitution, possession of weapons,
counterfeiting, violations resulting in the deprivation of freedom
Drug Related Crimes Possession, trafficking, importation, production
6
Uniform Crime Reporting Incident Based Crime Survey
UCR Incident-based survey has 3 main files• Incident file• Accused file • Victim file
Each file can be used independently or they can be linked – depending on the research question.
Significant number of records
7
8
How many years of data are available?
5 years of data• RDC -- 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011• RTRA -- 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Files can be used individually or combined Increases N for small cells NO TREND analysis Population data included to produce rates
9
Potential Research Questions for UCR data
Intimate partner violence Violence against children and youth Youth crime – patterns, characteristics Adult crime – patterns, characteristic Temporal patterns of crime Crimes involving weapons Family verses non-family victimization
10
Potential Research Questions for UCR data (cont’d)
Gender differences – Offending
Gender differences – Victimization
Property crimes, CMA & non-CMA
Robbery crimes, CMA & non-CMA
11
Confidentiality Measures for the UCR RDC/RTRA files
Characteristics of individual incidents, accused or victims will not be disseminated to the public.
CCJS has developed confidentiality vetting guidelines specific to the UCR Survey to prevent the disclosure of sensitive information.
3 main steps taken to maintain confidentiality• Excluded highly sensitive variables from file• Aggregated sensitive response categories• Developed disclosure rules
12
UCR Variables EXCLUDED from RDC/RTRA Files
Variables that identify • Name of victim, accused
• Date of birth
• Fingerprint identifier of accused
• Incident file number
Variables with unknown or poor data quality• Address, postal code, geo-code
• Aboriginal origin of accused/victim
13
UCR Variables INCLUDED on the RDC/ RTRA -- Incident Files
Location school, institution, private dwelling, open area,
streets
Time and Date of Incident Occupancy
indicates whether the victim and accused were living together
14
UCR Variables INCLUDED on the RDC/ RTRA – Incident Files (cont’d)
Geography• National, province/territory, CMA and Non CMA
Most Serious Weapon Present
Clearance Status
UCR Variables INCLUDED on the RDC/ RTRA – Accused & Victim Files
ACCUSED FILE Age Sex Date charges laid
VICTIM FILE Age Sex Relationship to the
accused Injury sustained Weapon causing
injury
15
Incident Clearance Status • E.g., death of a complainant, the suicide or death of
the accused; accused to a mental hospital.
Incident Time • Researcher must collapse the time into 6-hour
intervals.
Sensitive violation codes • Other sexual violations• Terrorism• Homicide
16
Aggregated Response Categories and Violation
Disclosure Risk Scores and Rounding
Produce outputs with confidentiality risk scores that are at or below the acceptable threshold. • RDCs only
If confidentiality risk scores are too high:• Remove potentially sensitive variable(s) from the
output to reduce the overall score; and/or • Aggregate potentially sensitive variable(s) from the
output to reduce the overall score.
Apply a controlled rounding program applied to the output• Automatically applied to RTRA outputs
17
RDC or RTRA
RDC Modeling, regression
analysis Descriptive analysis of
violations with small counts
Confidentiality measures: Disclosure rules, based on scores and a cap or rounding
RTRA Descriptive statistics of
offences that are common, large geography (i.e., national and provincial , CMA and non-CMA)
Confidentiality measures: Rounding program (base 5)
18
19
Rounding
IOffence Actual Rounded
Attempted Murder 13 15Aggravated Sexual Assault 2 5Sexual Assault with a Weapon 11 10Sexual Assault 587 585Sexual Interference 54 55Aggravated Assault - Level 3 24 25Assault Against Peace-Public Officer 2 0Aggravated Assault Against Peace Officer 1 0Abduction Under 14, by Parent/Guardian 5 5Robbery 1457 1455Criminal Harassment 201 200Indecent/Harassing Telephone Calls 63 65Uttering Threat to Person 449 450Arson – Disregard for Human Life 5 5
Other Violations against the person 12 15
UCR Incident Based SurveyEnd-User Documentation
Developed from police scoring guides Extremely detailed (403 pages)
User-friendly Detailed confidentiality guidelines & vetting rules Scoring guide Rounding option Aggregations SAS coding examples Variable definitions & descriptions Many typos!!!!
20
Homicide Survey Files - RDC & RTRA
New pilot starting October 2013 Second attempt – 2009 pilot cancelled due to
insufficient resources Results from the first pilot were positive
• ease of use of data file, documentation and wealth of data/information
However data disclosure rules difficult to implement
21
Homicide Survey Pilot, 2013
Development of user-friendly disclosure rules to ensure confidentiality of data• Because of small numbers Homicide Survey presents
a unique challenge with regard to confidentiality
Approach for disclosure rules similar to UCR
22
23
Homicide Survey Disclosure Rules
Threshold table value: 7• Table scores>7 are not released
Maximum number of dimensions: 3
Variables deemed NOT sensitive (score 0):• 10-year data• National data• Sex of victim, accused
What kinds of data are available from the Homicide Survey?
Data available from 1961-2011 3 Files – Incident, Victim, Accused Detailed reporting on:
• Marital status
• Detailed location
• Drugs related homicide
• Precipitating crime
• Alcohol/ drugs consumed (accused or victim)
• Apparent motive
• Accused-victim relationship
• Cause of death
24
25
Potential Research Questions for Homicide data
Family related homicides Intimate partner homicides Temporal analysis Firearm related homicides CMA and non-CMA analysis Precipitating factors
Pilot - Hate Crime File
Additional data file which is linked to the UCR Incident-based survey
File available several months after initial data collection
Police services determine if the criminal act was motivated by hate of:• Race, age, sex, religion• Sexual orientation, physical disability • Language, color, nationality, ethnicity
26
Pilot - Integrated Criminal Courts Survey
Administrative records of cases before the courts
Provincial and territorial data Variables include age, sex of individual before
the courts Count of decisions by charge Types of decision, (guilty, probation) Sentencing patterns
27
Research QuestionsIntegrated Criminal Courts Survey
Case processing times
Elapsed time
Efficiency of the justice system
28