SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

DEPARTMENT 2D HON. ELIA WEINBACH

MAEVE COOPER, ))

PETITIONER, ) )

VS. ) NO. SD026673 )

DANIEL COOPER, ))

RESPONDENT. ) ___________________________________)

REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2011

APPEARANCES:

FOR THE PETITIONER:

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL STOLLER BY: MICHAEL STOLLER

23945 CALABASAS ROAD SUITE 106 CALABASAS, CA (818) 226-4040

FOR THE RESPONDENT:

DANIEL COOPER IN PROPRIA PERSONA

GINGER WELKER, #5585

OFFICIAL REPORTER

1

1 CASE NUMBER: SD026673

2 CASE NAME: COOPER VS. COOPER

3 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2011

4 DEPARTMENT NO. 2D HON. ELIA WEINBACH

5 REPORTER GINGER WELKER, CSR #5585

6 TIME: 11:25 A.M.

7 APPEARANCES: (SEE TITLE PAGE)

8

9 THE COURT: DANIEL COOPER AND MAEVE COOPER,

10 SD026673.

11 MR. STOLLER: GOOD MORNING, MICHAEL STOLLER ON

12 BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER MAEVE COOPER CROMMIE WHO IS

13 PRESENT AT COUNSEL TABLE.

14 THE COURT: AND MR. COOPER IS HERE.

15 MISS CROMMIE AND MR. COOPER, IF YOU WOULD

16 PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND TO BE SWORN BY THE CLERK.

17 THE CLERK: YOU, AND EACH OF YOU, DO SOLEMNLY

18 STATE THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU MAY GIVE IN THE CAUSE NOW

19 PENDING BEFORE THIS COURT SHALL BE THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE

20 TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD?

21 IF YOU AGREE, PLEASE SAY "I DO."

22 THE PETITIONER: I DO.

23 THE RESPONDENT: I DO.

24 THE COURT: PLEASE HAVE A SEAT. I HAVE RECEIVED

25 TODAY -- FROM MR. COOPER ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

26 MODIFICATION OF FORECLOSURE OF HOME. AND IT IS

27 ATTACHMENT AND DECLARATION ON THE BROOKLAKE PROPERTY

28 FORECLOSURE. IT IS MULTI-PAGES.

2

1 MR. STOLLER, DID YOU RECEIVE A COPY OF THIS

2 FILING?

3 MR. STOLLER: YES. I JUST RECEIVED IT TODAY IN

4 COURT, YOUR HONOR, BUT -- OUTSIDE COURT, BUT IT LOOKS

5 LIKE HE IS SERVING THIS WITH THE IDEA THAT THAT HEARING

6 WILL GO FORWARD TODAY.

7 THE COURT: I ALSO RECEIVED A MOTION TO COMPEL

8 FROM MR. COOPER, MOTION TO COMPEL, FOR THE REQUEST OF

9 DOCUMENTS FOR INSPECTION AND COPYING.

10 DID YOU RECEIVE THAT AS WELL?

11 MR. STOLLER: I DID, YOUR HONOR.

12 THE COURT: AND THEN FINALLY -- WELL, NOT FINALLY.

13 I RECEIVED A -- AN INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION DATED

14 JANUARY 19TH, 2011 TODAY WITH ATTACHMENT AND ALSO --

15 THIS IS A LOOSE -- I'M NOT SURE WHAT THIS IS.

16 MR. STOLLER: THAT IS AN I&E CALCULATION THAT I

17 SUBMITTED TO THE COURT BASED UPON SOME NOTES AT THE LAST

18 HEARING ON NOVEMBER 19TH. YOU HAD ORDERED ME TO PREPARE

19 ONE. I THOUGHT THERE WAS ONE THAT HAD BEEN PREPARED BY

20 THE PARTIES AT THE TIME OF THE LAST HEARING, SO I WASN'T

21 SURE IF IT WAS IN THE FILE. SO WE HAD THAT FAXED OVER

22 FROM MY OFFICE. I APOLOGIZE. I GAVE ONE TO MR. COOPER

23 AS WELL.

24 THE COURT: LET ME JUST DESCRIBE WHAT IT IS. IT

25 SAYS "CALCULATIONS RESULT, SUMMARY AND DETAIL," AND IT

26 IS FOUR PAGES?

27 MR. STOLLER: CORRECT, YOUR HONOR.

28 THE COURT: MR. COOPER, DO YOU HAVE A COPY OF

3

1 THAT?

2 THE PETITIONER: YES, YOUR HONOR.

3 MR. STOLLER: IT HAS MY FAX HEADER AT THE TOP OF

4 IT, MICHAEL STOLLER.

5 THE COURT: IT DOES, AND IT ALSO HAS PAGE 2

6 THROUGH 5. DO I ASSUME THAT PAGE 1 IS THE FAX COVER

7 SHEET?

8 MR. STOLLER: THAT IS, YOUR HONOR. I HAVE IT HERE

9 AT MY COUNSEL TABLE.

10 THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANY CALCULATION

11 OF FAX COVER SHEET BECAUSE -- BECAUSE THE PROBLEM IS

12 THIS FILING WITHOUT -- I COULDN'T TELL FROM ITS FACE WHO

13 IT IS FROM.

14 MR. STOLLER: SURE. I MADE ANOTHER -- I HAVE ONE

15 TO PRESENT TO THE COURT.

16 THE COURT: JUAN, MAKE TWO COPIES, ONE FOR THE

17 COURT AND ONE FOR MR. COOPER. ALL RIGHT. WITH RESPECT

18 TO THE FILINGS OF MR. COOPER, TODAY IN PARTICULAR, THE

19 FIRST ONE, THE OSC TO MODIFY SAYS FORECLOSURE OF HOME.

20 MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THIS -- THE PURPOSE

21 OF TODAY'S HEARING WAS TO DETERMINE WHY THE COURT SHOULD

22 NOT GRANT THE PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO COMPEL

23 MR. COOPER TO COMPLY WITH THE JUDGMENT.

24 THANK YOU. LET ME DO ONE THING AT A TIME.

25 I WILL COME BACK TO THIS. I HAVE BEEN GIVEN A COPY OF

26 THE FAXED COVER SHEET AND FROM MR. STOLLER'S OFFICE TO

27 HIMSELF.

28 MR. COOPER, DO YOU HAVE A COPY OF THAT?

4

1 THE PETITIONER: YES.

2 THE COURT: OKAY.

3 THE PETITIONER: FAXED IT TO HIMSELF?

4 THE COURT: I THINK IT IS -- IT IS BASICALLY HIS

5 OFFICE FAXED IT TO HIM IN COURT.

6 IS THAT CORRECT, MR. STOLLER?

7 MR. STOLLER: YES, TO THIS NEXT -- TO MY

8 ATTENTION.

9 THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. THAT WILL BE

10 FILED WITH THE COURT FILE AS WELL AS THE FILINGS OF

11 MR. COOPER. LET ME JUST REFRESH MY MEMORY HERE.

12 ON JANUARY 14TH, THE COURT ORDERED

13 RESPONDENT TO PROVIDE TO THE COURT HIS OPPOSITION TO

14 PETITIONER'S EX PARTE WHICH IS -- THE COURT DENIED.

15 AND THE ISSUE WAS WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT

16 REQUIRE RESPONDENT TO SIGN -- I'M TRYING TO READ MY OWN

17 HANDWRITING -- THE INTERSPOUSAL TRUST DEED IMMEDIATELY

18 IN ORDER TO EFFECT THE TERMS OF PARAGRAPH 14 OF THE

19 JUDGMENT DATED JULY 7TH, 2009.

20 AND I TAKE IT, MR. COOPER, YOUR POSITION IS

21 THAT YOUR RESPONSE THAT YOU FILED TODAY IS -- YOU ARE IN

22 THOSE PAPERS ATTEMPTING TO CONVINCE THE COURT WHY YOU

23 SHOULD NOT BE ORDERED TO COMPLY WITH THE JULY 2009

24 ORDER; IS THAT CORRECT?

25 THE PETITIONER: YES, BUT THERE IS SOMETHING I

26 NEED TO ASK THE COURT:

27 THE COURT: YES.

28 THE PETITIONER: YOUR HONOR, ELIA WEINBACH, ARE

5

1 YOU RECEIVING PAYMENTS FROM LA COUNTY?

2 THE COURT: EXCUSE ME?

3 THE PETITIONER: ARE YOU RECEIVING PAYMENTS FROM

4 LA COUNTY?

5 THE COURT: MR. COOPER, I AM NOT SURE THE

6 RELEVANCE OF YOUR QUESTIONING THE COURT AS TO WHETHER OR

7 NOT I AM RECEIVING PAYMENTS FROM LA COUNTY. WHAT IS --

8 WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH WHETHER OR NOT THIS COURT

9 HAS THE POWER TO ORDER YOU TO SIGN AN INTERSPOUSAL DEED?

10 THE PETITIONER: YOUR HONOR, UNDER CODE OF

11 JUDICIAL ETHICS, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO DISCLOSE THAT

12 INFORMATION. IT SAYS RIGHT HERE -- LET'S SEE, UNDER

13 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CCP 170.1A3, "YOU MUST DISCLOSE

14 THE MONEYS YOU RECEIVED FROM LA COUNTY IN ALL TRIAL

15 PROCEEDINGS. A JUDGE SHALL DISCLOSE ON THE RECORD

16 INFORMATION THAT IS REASONABLY RELEVANT TO THE QUESTION

17 OF DISQUALIFICATION; EVEN IF THE JUDGE BELIEVES THERE IS

18 NO ACTUAL BASIS FOR THIS QUALIFICATION, CANON 3E2 CODE

19 OF JUDICIAL ETHICS."

20 THE COURT: OKAY. MR. COOPER, YOU ARE

21 REPRESENTING YOURSELF; CORRECT?

22 THE PETITIONER: THAT WOULD BE CORRECT.

23 THE COURT: I CANNOT GIVE YOU LEGAL ADVICE. THERE

24 ARE GROUNDS TO MOVE TO DISQUALIFY A JUDGE. I CAN'T TELL

25 YOU WHAT THEY ARE. THAT WOULD BE GIVING YOU LEGAL

26 ADVICE. YOU CAN GO TO THE RESOURCE CENTER IN ROOM 426

27 AND INQUIRE, OR YOU CAN SEEK ADVICE FROM COUNSEL.

28 BUT UNLESS THERE IS A MOTION TO DISQUALIFY

6

1 ME, THIS PROCEEDING IS NOT A PROCEEDING FOR THE COURT TO

2 ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS OR FOR THAT MATTER MISS CROMMIE'S

3 QUESTIONS UNLESS THEY ARE RELEVANT TO THE PROCEEDING

4 BEFORE US. THE PROCEEDING BEFORE US IS A VERY SIMPLE

5 ONE WHICH IS THAT THERE WAS AN ORDER IN JULY 2009 WHICH

6 REQUIRED YOU -- AND LET ME JUST GET THE ORDER -- JULY 9,

7 2009 ORDER -- JULY 7, 2009 JUDGMENT PROVIDED --

8 THE PETITIONER: YOU CAN LOOK AT THE MINUTE ORDERS

9 ON 5/26/09 IT STATES AS FOLLOWS --

10 THE COURT: EXCUSE ME. EXCUSE ME. IN PARAGRAPH

11 14 WHICH IS TITLED 12618 BROOKLAKE STREET PROPERTY

12 FAMILY HOME -- AND I'M NOT READING THE ENTIRE PARAGRAPH,

13 BUT IT SAYS IN THE RELEVANT PART, "IT IS ORDERED BY THE

14 COURT THAT MAEVE COOPER" -- THE PETITIONER -- THE

15 PETITIONER IS NOT IN THE JUDGMENT -- "IS THE OWNER OF

16 THE PROPERTY AT 12618 BROOKLAKE STREET, LOS ANGELES,

17 CALIFORNIA 90066. MAEVE COOPER HAS 120 DAYS TO

18 REFINANCE THE PROPERTY. AT THE TIME OF REFINANCE,

19 DANIEL COOPER MUST COOPERATE AND SIGN TRANSFER OF

20 OWNERSHIP WITH ANY REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION."

21 THE COURT MADE A DETERMINATION THAT

22 MISS COOPER WAS THE OWNER, AND IT IS THE COURT'S

23 UNDERSTANDING THAT MR. COOPER HAS NOT EXECUTED A

24 QUITCLAIM DEED OR IN OTHER DOCUMENTATIONS TO SATISFY

25 BANKS OR OTHER PARTIES; THAT SHE IS THE SOLE OWNER OF

26 THE PROPERTY:

27 SO THE ONLY ISSUE HERE IS WHETHER OR NOT THE

28 COURT OUGHT TO ORDER YOU TO COMPLY. HOWEVER, SINCE YOU

7

1 HAVE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION TWO THINGS TO THE COURT --

2 ONE IS YOU FILED A FAIRLY LENGTHY RESPONSE WHICH NEITHER

3 THE COURT NOR MR. STOLLER PRESUMABLY HAVE HAD A CHANCE

4 TO REVIEW.

5 AND YOU HAVE JUST MOST RECENTLY SUGGESTED BY

6 IMPLICATION THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT THERE ARE GROUNDS --

7 OR BELIEVE THERE ARE GROUNDS FOR DISQUALIFICATION OR

8 DISCLOSURE. I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO GO

9 TO ROOM 426 IN THIS BUILDING AND COME BACK AT 2:30.

10 THAT WILL GIVE MR. STOLLER TIME, TOO, AND

11 THE COURT HOPEFULLY WILL HAVE TIME TO REVIEW THE PAPERS

12 THAT YOU HAVE FILED LATE AND ALSO TO TAKE WHATEVER

13 ACTION YOU DEEM APPROPRIATE WITH RESPECT TO THE COURT'S

14 OBLIGATIONS TO COMPLY WITH CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL

15 PROCEDURE 170.6 AND THE CANON OF JUDICIAL ETHICS.

16 SO WE WILL SEE YOU BACK AT 2:30.

17 MR. STOLLER: MAY I BE HEARD? I APPRECIATE THE

18 LATITUDE YOU ARE GIVING MR. COOPER. IF IT IS 170.6

19 GROUNDS, THE TIME FRAME FOR THAT HAS TO BE DONE AT

20 COMMENCEMENT OF THE PROCEEDING AS THE COURT IS AWARE OF.

21 IF THERE ARE OTHER GROUNDS, IT HAS TO BE PRESENTED BY AN

22 APPROPRIATE MOTION, EVEN EX PARTE. AND NOT WITHSTANDING

23 HIM NOT BEING REPRESENTED, THERE WOULD BE NO TIME FOR

24 THAT TO BE HEARD BY THE COURT TODAY.

25 I DON'T BELIEVE THERE IS ANY BASIS FROM

26 THEIR -- THIS IS MY THIRD PROCEEDING THAT I'M AWARE OF,

27 AND THIS WAS TRANSFERRED FROM SAN MONICA TO YOUR

28 HONOR -- THAT WOULD ALLOW THE GROUNDS UNDER THE OTHER

8

1 PROVISIONS OF 170 IN ITS SEQUENCE. SO I DO APPRECIATE

2 THAT.

3 BUT THERE ARE TWO THINGS: ONE AS YOU KNOW

4 IS THE PROXIMITY TO THE SALE DATE.

5 THE COURT: IS IT THE 24TH?

6 MR. STOLLER: 24TH, NUMBER ONE. THE PAPERS THAT

7 MR. COOPER FILED TODAY ALTHOUGH HE HAS INDICATED THAT HE

8 FILED THEM -- IT IS REALLY NOT A RESPONSE. IT IS

9 ANOTHER OSC WHICH SHOULD BE SET, IF ANYTHING, ON AN

10 EX-PARTE BASIS, SHORTENED TIME.

11 BUT IT IS TALKING ABOUT ASKING FOR

12 DISCOVERY. I LOOKED THROUGH IT, BUT THERE IS NOTHING

13 RELEVANT OR ON POINT TO OUR EX PARTE WHICH THE COURT

14 INDICATED THAT THE RESPONSE SHOULD BE IN AHEAD OF TIME.

15 SO I THINK IF THE COURT IS INCLINED TO

16 PROVIDE HIM SOME OPPORTUNITY, THE END RESULT IS THAT

17 THERE IS NOTHING BEFORE THE COURT THAT WOULD PREVENT

18 FROM MOVING FORWARD ON THE -- ON THE MATTERS BEFORE IT.

19 THE OTHER MATTER IS CONTINUATION OF THE OSC WHICH I

20 THINK THE COURT MAY BE AWARE OF FROM NOVEMBER 19TH. IT

21 HAD TO DO WITH THE SUPPORT FOR THE CHILD CARE.

22 THE COURT: I'LL MAKE DECISIONS AT 2:30.

23 MR. STOLLER: OKAY.

24 THE COURT: THE ONLY REASON THAT I'M -- I AM

25 SAYING 2:30 IS TO AFFORD THE RESPONDENT AN OPPORTUNITY

26 TO FILE -- I HAVE NO IDEA OF WHAT THE BASIS FOR ANY --

27 EITHER DISQUALIFICATION OF RECUSAL. I HAVE NO IDEA.

28 AND I WANT TO AT LEAST AFFORD THE RESPONDENT THE

9

1 OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO.

2 IF HE IS UNABLE TO CONVINCE ME THAT THERE A

3 PROBLEM OR WHAT HE IS DOING IS ACTUALLY FILED, I'LL MAKE

4 A RULING ON THAT. AND THEN I INTEND TO RULE ON -- IN

5 THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER TO ORDER MR. COOPER TO

6 SIGN THE INTERSPOUSAL DEED.

7 MR. STOLLER: OKAY. THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. I

8 GUESS WE WILL SEE YOU AT 2:30.

9 THE COURT: NOW, I HAVE GOT A LENGTHY MATTER, BUT

10 WE WILL -- WE ARE GOING TO DEAL WITH THIS TODAY.

11 THE PETITIONER: SO TODAY IS -- ONLY DEALT WITH

12 HIS EX PARTE ON FRIDAY, THE 14TH, AND AS NOT -- DOES NOT

13 HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE CHILD SUPPORT THAT WAS

14 INITIALLY FILED ON JANUARY 17TH OF 2010?

15 THE COURT: I DIDN'T SAY THAT.

16 THE PETITIONER: OH, ALL RIGHT.

17 THE COURT: THERE'S A TIME ISSUE WITH RESPECT TO

18 THE DEED.

19 MR. STOLLER: YES, YOUR HONOR.

20 THE COURT: THANK YOU.

21

22 (UNRELATED MATTERS WERE HANDLED BY THE COURT.)

23

24 THE COURT: WE WILL GO BACK ON THE RECORD FOR FIVE

25 MINUTES ON THE COOPER MATTER. I HAVE A HANDWRITTEN

26 MOTION FROM MR. COOPER.

27 DO YOU HAVE A COPY, MR. STOLLER?

28 MR. STOLLER: I DO, YOUR HONOR.

10

1 THE COURT: WE'LL TAKE FIVE MINUTES.

2

3 (BRIEF RECESS)

4

5 THE COURT: THE COOPER MATTER. THE PARTIES ARE

6 HERE AND MR. STOLLER, THE ATTORNEY FOR THE PETITIONER,

7 IS HERE. I RECEIVED A TWO-PAGE HANDWRITTEN DOCUMENT

8 ENTITLED -- FROM MR. COOPER, THE RESPONDENT, ENTITLED

9 MOTION TO VOID ALL ORDERS AND JUDGMENTS BASED ON THE

10 FRAUD -- BASED UPON THE FRAUD ON THE COURT OF JUDGE ELIA

11 WEINBACH."

12 I'M GOING TO RULE ON THIS MOTION, BUT I NEED

13 TO CHECK SOME THINGS. THE PARTIES AND COUNSEL ARE

14 ORDERED TO REMAIN HERE. AFTER I RULE ON THIS MOTION IN

15 THE EVENT THAT I DENY THE MOTION, I INTEND TO RULE UPON

16 THE MOTION OR EX-PARTE APPLICATION OF MISS CROMMIE AS I

17 UNDERSTAND THE TIME SENSITIVITY. SO I'M GOING TO TAKE

18 THIS IN CHAMBERS. I HAVE TO CHECK A COUPLE OF THINGS,

19 AND I'LL BE BACK TO YOU. I'M JUST -- WE ARE GOING TO

20 TAKE A RECESS.

21 THE PETITIONER: HOW LONG WILL WE BE IN RECESS,

22 MAY I ASK?

23 THE COURT: UNTIL I'M SATISFIED THAT A -- ON THIS

24 SUBJECT BUT JUST STAY HERE -- OR AT LEAST STAY WITHIN

25 THE CONFINES SO WE CAN GET AHOLD OF YOU.

26 MR. STOLLER: THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.

27 THE COURT: THANK YOU.

28

11

1 (A RECESS WAS TAKEN.)

2

3 THE COURT: BACK ON RECORD IN CROMMIE/COOPER

4 MATTER. THE PARTIES ARE HERE, AND MR. STOLLER

5 REPRESENTING MISS CROMMIE IS ALSO HERE. I RECEIVED -- I

6 DON'T THINK I NOTED. I RECEIVED MR. COOPER'S MOTION

7 AROUND 3:00. I DON'T REMEMBER THE EXACT TIME, 3:00 P.M.

8 AND I AM GOING TO ORDER THE PARTIES TO COME

9 BACK HERE AT 10:30 IN THE MORNING. I NEED TO DO FURTHER

10 RESEARCH, 10:30 A.M.

11 I WILL INTERRUPT WHATEVER WE ARE DOING AT

12 10:30 TO ACCOMMODATE YOU BECAUSE I KNOW YOU HAVE BEEN

13 PATIENT THROUGHOUT THE DAY. AND AS I INDICATED IF I

14 DENY THE -- MR. COOPER'S MOTION, I INTEND TO GO STRAIGHT

15 TO THE MOTION OF MISS CROMMIE. AND SO YOU -- BOTH OF

16 YOU SHOULD BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THAT.

17 MR. STOLLER: YOUR HONOR, IF I MAY INQUIRE, IS IT

18 GOING TO BE SOLELY EXPLICIT TO THAT, OR ARE WE ALSO

19 GOING TO DEAL WITH THE CONTINUATION OF THE OSC THAT

20 WAS --

21 THE COURT: I DON'T KNOW WHAT MY SCHEDULE IS

22 TOMORROW BUT --

23 MR. STOLLER: IT IS SECONDARY TO THE OTHER ISSUE.

24 THE COURT: WELL, THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING. IT IS

25 NOT TIME SENSITIVE, BUT I'LL TRY TO DO AS MUCH AS I CAN.

26 I JUST CAN'T PROMISE IT. I AM DOING IT BECAUSE I WANT

27 TO DEAL WITH THE TIME SENSITIVE MOTION. ONE, IN THE

28 EVENT I DENY MR. COOPER'S MOTION, I'M WELL AWARE OF

12

1 THE -- OF THE JANUARY 24TH DATE. ALL RIGHT.

2 MR. STOLLER: I MAY HAVE A CONFLICT. I'LL TRY TO

3 REARRANGE THAT. I MAY HAVE ANOTHER ASSOCIATE APPEAR.

4 AS FAR AS THIS ISSUE, I THINK IT'S STRAIGHTFORWARD. I

5 WILL TRY TO MAKE MYSELF AVAILABLE, YOUR HONOR. I THANK

6 YOU.

7 THE COURT: OKAY. THANK YOU. WE WILL SEE YOU

8 TOMORROW. ALL OTHER ORDERS REMAIN IN EFFECT, AND THE

9 COURT RESERVES JURISDICTION OVER ALL OTHER MATTERS.

10 MR. STOLLER: THANK YOU.

11

12 (THE PROCEEDINGS WERE THEN CONCLUDED.)

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

2 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

3 DEPARTMENT 2D HON. ELIA WEINBACH

4 MAEVE COOPER, ))

5 PETITIONER, ) )

6 VS. ) NO. SD026673 )

7 DANIEL COOPER, ))

8 RESPONDENT. ) ___________________________________)

9

10

11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS.

12 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

13

14 I, GINGER WELKER, OFFICIAL REPORTER OF THE

15 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE

16 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE

17 TRANSCRIPT DATED JANUARY 19, 2011 COMPRISES A FULL,

18 TRUE, AND CORRECT TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCEEDINGS HELD IN

19 THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE.

20 DATED THIS 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2011.

21

22

23 ______________________________

24 OFFICIAL REPORTER, CSR #5585

25

26

27

28

1 I N V O I C E

2 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

3 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

4

5 GINGER WELKER, CSR #5585

6 P.O. BOX 220652

7 SANTA CLARITA, CA 91322

8 (213) 687-5780 X1660 (VOICE MAIL)

9 EMAIL: G.GINGER@ATT.NET

10

11

12 TODAY'S DATE: JANUARY 19, 2011

13 DATE OF HEARING: JANUARY 19, 2011

14 TO: DANIEL COOPER

15 IN RE: COOPER VS. COOPER

16 CASE NO.: SD026673

17

18

19 ORIGINAL & 1 COPY & 2 ASCI'S OVERNIGHT DELIVERY

20 DEPOSIT RECEIVED $63.00

21 COST OF TRANSCRIPT $63.00

22 REFUND DUE $000

23

24 THANK YOU!

25

26

27

28