0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10...

101
Exploiting the Trifluoroethyl Group as a Precatalyst Ligand in Nickel-Catalyzed Suzuki- type Alkylations Yi Yang, * Qinghai Zhou, Junjie Cai, Teng Xue, § Yingle Liu, Yan Jiang, Yumei Su, Lungwa Chung * and David A. Vicic § * Key Laboratory of Green Catalysis of Higher Education Institutes of Sichuan, Sichuan University of Science & Engineering, Zigong 643000, China; Shenzhen Grubbs Institute and Department of Chemistry, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China; § Department of Chemistry, Lehigh University, 6 E. Packer Avenue, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Supporting Information Table of Contents I. General specifications ......................................................................................................................S2 II. Synthesis of precatalyst [(bipy)Ni(CH 2 CF 3 ) 2 ] ...................................................................................S3 III. Examination of the catalytic activities of [(bipy)Ni(CH 2 CF 3 ) 2 ] and reaction condition optimization ...S4 IV. Suzuki-type direct trifluoroethylation and alkylation of ArB(OH) 2 and characterization of Ar-R products ................................................................................................................................................S6 V. Copies of 1 H NMR , 19 F NMR and 13 C NMR spectra .......................................................................S16 VI. Control experiments for mechanistic studies .................................................................................S66 S1 Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Science. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019

Transcript of 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10...

Page 1: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Exploiting the Trifluoroethyl Group as a Precatalyst Ligand in Nickel-Catalyzed Suzuki-

type AlkylationsYi Yang,†* Qinghai Zhou,‡ Junjie Cai,† Teng Xue,§ Yingle Liu,† Yan Jiang,† Yumei Su,† Lungwa Chung‡* and David A. Vicic§*

†Key Laboratory of Green Catalysis of Higher Education Institutes of Sichuan, Sichuan University of Science & Engineering, Zigong 643000, China; ‡Shenzhen Grubbs Institute and Department of Chemistry, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China; §Department of Chemistry, Lehigh University, 6 E. Packer Avenue, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USAE-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Supporting Information

Table of Contents

I. General specifications ......................................................................................................................S2

II. Synthesis of precatalyst [(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2] ...................................................................................S3

III. Examination of the catalytic activities of [(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2] and reaction condition optimization ...S4

IV. Suzuki-type direct trifluoroethylation and alkylation of ArB(OH)2 and characterization of Ar-R

products ................................................................................................................................................S6

V. Copies of 1H NMR , 19F NMR and 13C NMR spectra.......................................................................S16

VI. Control experiments for mechanistic studies .................................................................................S66

S1

Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Science.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019

Page 2: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

I. General specifications

All reagents were used as received from commercial sources, unless specified otherwise, or

prepared as described in the literature. All manipulations were conducted using standard Schlenk and

high-vacuum techniques or in a nitrogen-filled glovebox. Solvents were distilled from

Na/benzophenone or CaH2. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a 500 MHz or 600

MHz spectrometer (TMS as internal standard). 19F NMR was also recorded on a 400 MHz or 500

MHz spectrometer (FCCl3 as outside standard and low field is positive). Chemical shifts (δ) are

reported in parts per million, and coupling constants (J) are in hertz. High resolution mass

spectrometry (EI/TOF or ESI-TOF) was performed at the Mass Spectrometry Facility.

Thin layer chromatography monitoring (TLC) was performed using precoated silica gel plate

(0.2 mm thickness, GF254). Subsequent to elution, plates were first visualized using UV radiation

(254 nm). Further visualization was conducted by staining with basic solution of potassium

permanganate or acidic solution of cerric molybdate, followed by heating on a hot plate. Flash

chromatography was performed using silica gel (200-300 mesh) with HPLC solvents. Columns were

typically packed as slurry and equilibrated with petroleum ether prior to use.

S2

Page 3: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

II. Synthesis of precatalyst [(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2]

A 100 mL round-bottom flask was charged with 2,2'-bipyridine (0.500 g, 3.20 mmol), Ni(COD)2

(0.880 g, 3.20 mmol) and THF (40 mL). After stirring at room temperature for 12 h, a THF solution

of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture

was stirred overnight, and then the volatiles were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was

redissolved in benzene (80 mL), and the suspension solution was passed through a sand-core glass

funnel to remove the insoluble [(bipy)NiI2]. After the solvent of the filtrate were removed under

reduced pressure, the residue solid was washed with pentane (5 mL×2) and dried in vacuo to

furnish [(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2] as a dark red powder (0.252 g, Yield 41%). Suitable single crystals for

X-ray analysis were obtained by recrystallization from THF/pentane solution at -25 oC. 1H NMR

(500 MHz, THF-d8): δ 8.69 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 8.23 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 8.09 (dt, J = 7.8 Hz, 1.3 Hz,

2H), 7.59 (m, 2H), 1.06 (q, J = 16.2 Hz, 4H); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ -47.98 (t, J = 16.2 Hz,

6F); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 156.22, 150.56, 139.39, 135.38 (q, J = 273.8 Hz), 127.16,

122.24, 6.11 (q, J = 23.6 Hz); Elemental analysis calcd (%) for C14H12F6N2Ni: C, 44.14; H, 3.18;

found: C, 44.01; H, 3.27.

Figure S1. ORTEP diagram of [(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2] (2). (CCDC 1436475)

S3

Page 4: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

III. Examination of the catalytic activities of [(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2] and

reaction condition optimization

4-biphenylboronic acid 2a (1.5 equiv), base (2.0 equiv), followed by a solution of CF3CH2I (1.0

equiv) in the indicated solvent (1.0 mL) were loaded into a 25 mL of Schlenck tube which was

subject to evacuating/flushing with nitrogen gas three times. The precatalyst 2 (5.0 mol%) in the

indicated solvent (0.5 mL) was added dropwise into the reaction system subsequently. The Schlenck

tube was screw capped and put into a preheated oil bath (80 oC). After stirring for 12-24 h, the

reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured into a saturated aqueous ammonium

chloride solution (10.0 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with ether three times (10.0 mL×3)

and the combined organic phase was dried over sodium sulfate. After removing the solvent in vacuo,

the residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel or preparative TLC to afford the

corresponding ArCH2CF3 products.

Table S1. Solvent effect on the precatalyst 2 catalyzed Suzuki-type trifluoroethylation

CF3CH2I5 mol% 2

K3PO4, solvent

+(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2 2

NNNi

F3CH2C CH2CF3

Ph

B(OH)2

Ph

CH2CF3

6a 7a

Entry Base Solvent T/ oC Isolated Yield

1 K3PO4 DME 80 93%

2 K3PO4 DMSO 80 91%

3 K3PO4 DMF 80 47%

4 K3PO4 CH3CN 80 35%

5 K3PO4 toluene 80 43%

6 K3PO4 THF 80 54%

S4

Page 5: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

7 K3PO4 dioxane 80 78%

Table S2. Base effect on the precatalyst 2 catalyzed Suzuki-type trifluoroethylation

CF3CH2I5 mol% 2

base, DME

+(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2 2

NNNi

F3CH2C CH2CF3

Ph

B(OH)2

Ph

CH2CF3

6a 7a

Entry Base Solvent T/ oC Isolated Yield

1 K3PO4 DME 80 93%

2 Na2CO3 DME 80 7%a

3 K2CO3 DME 80 23%a

4 Cs2CO3 DME 80 50%a

5 tBuOK DME 80 Traceb

6 NaOAc DME 80 NDc

aPartial dehydrofluorination of coupling product. bComplete dehydrofluorination of coupling product. cNo

conversion of CF3CH2I.

Table S3. Temperature effect of Suzuki-type trifluoroethylationa

CF3CH2I5 mol% 2

K3PO4, DME, x oC

+(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2 2

NNNi

F3CH2C CH2CF3

Ph

B(OH)2

Ph

CH2CF3

6a 7a

Entry Base Solvent T/ oC Isolated Yield

1 K3PO4 DME 80 93%

2 K3PO4 DME 50 77%

3 K3PO4 DME RT <5%

aThis experiment indicated the activation temperature of precatalyst [(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2] is approximately 50

S5

Page 6: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

oC which is lower than the commercialized (TMEDA)Ni(o-tol)(Cl) (the lower bound of activation is 60 oC) (J. D.

Shields, E. E. Gray and A. G. Doyle, Org. Lett., 2015, 17, 2166).

IV. Suzuki-type direct trifluoroethylation and alkylation of ArB(OH)2 and

characterization of Ar-R products

(a) Typical Procedure

Arylboronic acid (1.5 equiv), base (2.0 equiv), followed by a solution of CF3CH2I (0.4 mmol, 1.0

equiv) or the corresponding R-X (0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in the DME solvent (1.0 mL) were loaded

into a 25 mL of Schlenck tube which was subject to evacuating/flushing with nitrogen gas three

times. The precatalyst 2 (5.0 mol%) in the DME solvent (0.5 mL) was added dropwise into the

reaction system subsequently. The Schlenck tube was screw capped and put into a preheated oil bath

(80 oC). After stirring for 12-24 h, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured

into a saturated aqueous ammonium chloride solution (10.0 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted

with ether three times (10.0 mL×3) and the combined organic phase was dried over sodium sulfate.

After removing the solvent in vacuo, the residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel

or preparative TLC to afford the corresponding Ar-CH2CF3 or Ar-R products.

(b) Characterization of Ar-CH2CF3 and Ar-R Products

(7a). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane) = 0.65, 91% yield (87 mg). A gram-scale synthesis was

CH2CF3

Ph

implemented as the following procedure and the isolated yield can be comparatively effective (83%). 1H NMR

(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 4H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 3H), 3.40 (q, J = 10.8

Hz, 2H); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3) δ -65.85 (t, J= 10.8 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 141.12 (s),

140.53 (s), 130.60 (s), 129.14 (q, J= 2.9 Hz), 128.86 (s), 127.54 (s), 127.44 (s), 127.14 (s), 125.84 (q, J = 276.8 Hz),

39.92 (q, J = 29.8 Hz). MS (EI) m/z 236 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C14H11F3 236.0813, found

236.0808.

Gram-scale synthesis procedure: 4-biphenylboronic acid (2.38 g, 12.0 mmol, 1.5 equiv), K3PO4

(5.10 g, 24.0 mmol, 3.0 equiv), followed by a solution of CF3CH2I (0.80 mL, 8.0 mmol, 1.0 equiv)

in the DME solvent (20.0 mL) were loaded into a 100 mL of Schlenck tube which was subject to

evacuating/flushing with nitrogen gas three times. The precatalyst 2 (76.0 mg, 2.5 mol%) in the

DME solvent (5.0 mL) was added dropwise into S6

Page 7: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

the reaction system subsequently. The Schlenck tube was screw capped and put into a preheated oil

bath (80 oC). After stirring for 24 h, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured

into a saturated aqueous ammonium chloride solution (100.0 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted

with ether three times (70.0 mL×3) and the combined organic phase was dried over sodium sulfate.

After removing the solvent in vacuo, the residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel

(eluent: petroleum ether) afford the corresponding 4-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)-1,1'-biphenyl 7a (1.57 g,

yield 83%).

(7b). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane) = 0.60, 79% yield (68 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3):

CH2CF3

δ 7.38 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 3.33 (q, J = 10.9 Hz, 2H), 1.33 (s, 9H); 19F NMR (470 MHz,

CDCl3): δ -65.97 (t, J = 10.9 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 151.27, 130.06, 127.35 (q, J = 2.7 Hz),

126.14 (q, J = 276.6 Hz), 125.83, 39.93 (q, J = 29.6 Hz), 34.75, 31.50. MS (EI) m/z 216 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF)

m/z [M]+ Calcd for C12H15F3 216.1126, found 216.1120.

(7c). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane) = 0.55, 86% yield (65 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3):

CH2CF3

MeO

δ 7.21 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.90-6.87 (m, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.29 (q, J = 10.8 Hz, 2H); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3):

δ -66.44 (t, J = 10.8 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.65, 131.46, 126.11 (q, J = 276.6 Hz), 122.35 (q,

J = 2.8 Hz), 114.27, 55.42, 39.57 (q, J = 29.7 Hz); MS (EI) m/z 190 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for

C9H9F3O 190.0605, found 190.0608.

(7d). White solid, TLC Rf (hexane) = 0.55, 83% yield (88 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3):

CH2CF3

BnO

δ 7.45 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.41 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.37-7.33 (m, 1H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.00-6.97 (m, 2H),

5.07 (s, 2H), 3.31 (q, J = 10.9 Hz, 2H); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ -66.31 (t, J = 10.9 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (125

MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.87, 137.02, 131.49, 128.83, 128.24, 127.68, 126.08 (q, J = 276.7 Hz), 122.63 (q, J = 2.8 Hz),

115.19, 70.21, 39.57 (q, J = 29.7 Hz). MS (EI) m/z 266 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C15H13F3O

266.0918, found 266.0921.

S7

Page 8: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

(7e). Light yellow oil, TLC Rf (hexane : EtOAc = 10 : 1) = 0.55, 80% yield (71 mg). 1H NMR O

O CH2CF3

(500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.83 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (dd, J = 8.3 Hz, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (s,

4H), 3.24 (q, J = 10.8 Hz, 2H); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ -66.26 (t, J = 10.8 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (125 MHz,

CDCl3): δ 143.71, 143.69, 126.02 (q, J = 276.7 Hz), 123.35, 121.60, 119.20, 117.60, 64.50, 64.48, 39.64 (q, J =

29.8 Hz). MS (EI) m/z 220 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C10H11F3O2 220.0711, found 220.0715.

(7f). Light yellow oil, TLC Rf (hexane : EtOAc = 9 : 1) = 0.45, 70% yield (53 mg). 1H NMR

CH2CF3

OHC

(500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 10.01 (s, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 3.44 (q, J = 10.6 Hz, 2H);

19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ -65.47 (t, J = 10.6 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 191.89, 136.92 (q, J =

2.8 Hz), 136.33, 131.10, 130.18, 125.52 (q, J = 277.0 Hz), 40.52 (q, J = 30.0 Hz). MS (EI) m/z 188 (M+); HRMS

(EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C9H7F3O 188.0449, found 188.0447.

(7g). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane : EtOAc = 5 : 1) = 0.48, 74% yield (60 mg). 1H NMR

CH2CF3

O

(500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.93 (dt, J = 8.3 Hz, 2.0 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 3.41 (q, J = 10.7 Hz, 2H), 2.58 (s,

3H); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ -65.57 (t, J = 10.6 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 197.74, 137.06,

135.45 (q, J = 2.7 Hz), 130.63, 128.84, 125.60 (q, J = 277.0 Hz), 40.33 (q, J = 30.0 Hz), 26.81. MS (EI) m/z 202

(M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C10H9F3O 202.0605, found 202.0600.

(7h). White solid, TLC Rf (hexane : EtOAc = 6 : 1) = 0.45, 80% yield (70 mg). 1H NMR

CH2CF3

MeO2C

(500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.01 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.40 (q, J = 10.7 Hz, 2H); 19F

NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ -65.62 (t, J = 10.7 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 166.84, 135.28 (q, J = 2.6

Hz), 130.42, 130.24, 130.10, 125.62 (q, J = 276.9 Hz), 52.40, 40.35 (q, J = 30.0 Hz). MS (EI) m/z 218 (M+);

HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C10H9F3O2 218.0555, found 218.0552.

(7i). White solid, TLC Rf (hexane : EtOAc = 6 : 1) = 0.35, 72% yield (53 mg). 1H NMR (500

CH2CF3

NC

MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.64 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 3.42 (q, J = 10.5 Hz, 2H); 19F NMR (470 MHz,

CDCl3): δ -65.55 (t, J = 10.6 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (125 S8

Page 9: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

MHz, CDCl3): δ 135.50 (q, J = 2.8 Hz), 132.65, 131.16, 125.33 (q, J = 277.0 Hz), 118.52, 112.56, 40.42 (q, J =

30.3 Hz). MS (EI) m/z 185 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C9H6F3N 185.0452, found 185.0452.

(7j). Yellow oil, TLC Rf (hexane : EtOAc = 9 : 1) = 0.45, 48% yield (36 mg). 1H NMR (600

OHC CH2CF3

MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.03 (s, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (s, 1H), 7.57 (dt, J = 14.9, 7.6 Hz, 2H), 3.47 (q, J =

10.6 Hz, 2H); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3) δ -65.84 (t, J = 10.8 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.77 (s),

136.83 (s), 136.06 (s), 131.33 (q, J = 3.2 Hz), 131.13 (s), 129.49 (s), 128.19 (s), 125.44 (q, J = 276.8 Hz), 39.99 (q,

J = 30.2 Hz). MS (EI) m/z 188 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C9H7F3O 188.0449, found 188.0447.

(7k). Yellow oil, TLC Rf (hexane : EtOAc = 5 : 1) = 0.50, 67% yield (54 mg). 1H NMR (600

CH2CF3

O

MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.94 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (s, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.44 (q, J

= 10.7 Hz, 2H), 2.62 (s, 3H); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3) δ -65.87 (t, J = 10.6 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (151 MHz,

CDCl3) δ 197.62 (s), 137.57 (s), 134.70 (s), 130.79 (q, J = 2.9 Hz), 129.95 (s), 129.03 (s), 128.21 (s), 125.53 (q, J =

276.9 Hz), 40.10 (q, J = 29.9 Hz), 26.64 (s). MS (EI) m/z 202 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for

C10H9F3O 202.0605, found 202.0600.

(7l). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane : EtOAc = 6 : 1) = 0.45, 63% yield (55 mg). 1H NMR

MeO2C CH2CF3

(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.03 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (s, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.93

(s, 3H), 3.43 (q, J = 10.7 Hz, 2H); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3) δ -65.91 (t, J = 10.6 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (151 MHz,

CDCl3) δ 166.62 (s), 134.57 (s), 131.33 (s), 130.72 (s), 130.54 (q, J = 2.9 Hz), 129.38 (s), 128.83 (s), 125.54 (q, J =

276.9 Hz), 52.26 (s), 40.04 (q, J = 30.0 Hz). MS (EI) m/z 218 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for

C10H9F3O2 218.0555, found 218.0552.

(7m). White solid, TLC Rf (hexane : EtOAc = 6 : 1) = 0.35, 44% yield (33 mg). 1H NMR (600

NC CH2CF3

MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.66 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (s, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.42 (q, J

= 10.5 Hz, 2H); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3) δ -65.83 (t, J = 10.8 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 134.59

(s), 133.64 (s), 131.94 (s), 131.65 (q, J = 2.9 Hz), 129.64 (s), 125.16 (q, J = 277.0 Hz), 118.24 (s), 113.11 (s), 39.83

(q, J = 30.4 Hz). MS (EI) m/z 185 (M+); HRMS (EI- TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C9H6F3N 185.0452, found S9

Page 10: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

185.0452.

(7n). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane) = 0.55, 74% yield (70 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3)

Ph CH2CF3

δ 7.57 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 3H), 7.51 (s, 1H), 7.47 – 7.40 (m, 3H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.43

(q, J = 10.8 Hz, 2H); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3) δ -65.77 (t, J = 10.6 Hz, 3F). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ

141.81 (s), 140.66 (s), 130.67(q, J= 5.6 Hz), 129.12 (s), 129.07 (s), 129.01 (s), 128.86 (s), 128.86 (s), 127.58 (s),

127.23(s), 127.23(s), 126.98 (s), 125.82 (q, J = 276.9 Hz), 40.33 (q, J = 29.7 Hz). MS (EI) m/z 236 (M+); HRMS

(EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C14H11F3 236.0813, found 236.0808.

(7o). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 5 : 1) = 0.40, 78% yield (60 mg). 1H NMR (500 N OMe

CH2CF3

MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.13 (dd, J = 5.0 Hz, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (dd, J = 7.3 Hz, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.95

(s, 3H), 3.40 (q, J = 10.8 Hz); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ -65.50 (t, J = 10.8 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (125 MHz,

CDCl3): δ 162.62, 147.01, 140.09, 126.02 (q, J = 277.3 Hz), 116.93, 113.48 (q, J = 2.8 Hz), 53.86, 33.62 (q, J =

30.6 Hz). MS (EI) m/z 191 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C8H8F3NO 191.0558, found 191.0554.

(7p). White solid, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 2 : 1) = 0.40, 82% yield (69 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, N

CH2CF3

CDCl3): δ 9.24 (s, 1H), 8.49 (s, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.96 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (ddd, J = 8.4 Hz, 6.9

Hz, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (q, J = 10.4 Hz, 2H); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ -64.71 (t, J =

10.3 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 153.63, 145.63, 135.21, 131.25, 128.63, 127.63, 125.92 (q, J = 277.6

Hz), 122.93, 120.48, 34.60 (q, J = 30.9 Hz). MS (EI) m/z 211 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C11H8F3N

211.0609, found 211.0601.

(7q). White solid, TLC Rf (hexane) = 0.55, 36% yield (30 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ

CH2CF3

8.03 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (dd, J = 7.4 Hz, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (ddd, J = 8.5 Hz, 6.8 Hz,

1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (ddd, J = 8.0 Hz, 6.9 Hz, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.50-7.46 (m, 2H), 3.87 (q, J = 10.6 Hz, 2H); 19F NMR

(470 MHz, CDCl3): δ -64.66 (t, J = 10.6 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 134.09, 132.54, 129.66, 129.28,

129.05, 126.82, 126.61 (q, J = 2.3 Hz), 126.33 (q, J = 276.3 Hz), 126.10, 125.46, 123.79, 36.94 (q, J = 30.0 Hz).

MS (EI) m/z 210 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C12H9F3 210.0656, found 210.0662.S10

Page 11: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

(7r). White solid, TLC Rf (hexane) = 0.57, 42% yield (35 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3):

CH2CF3

δ 7.88-7.84 (m, 3H), 7.79 (s, 1H), 7.55-7.51 (m, 2H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 3.54 (q, J = 10.8 Hz, 2H); 19F NMR

(470 MHz, CDCl3): δ -66.79 (t, J = 10.5 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 133.47, 133.08, 129.70, 128.59,

128.00, 127.90, 127.80, 126.61, 126.54, 126.13 (q, J = 277.0 Hz), 40.54 (q, J = 29.7 Hz). MS (EI) m/z 210 (M+);

HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C12H9F3 210.0656, found 210.0662.

(7s). White solid, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 4 : 1) = 0.50, 61% yield (100

O

F3CH2C O

O O

mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.76 (dd, J = 10.8, 8.5 Hz, 4H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.87 (d, J = 8.8 Hz,

2H), 5.09 (dt, J = 12.5, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 3.46 (q, J = 10.7 Hz, 2H), 1.66 (s, 6H), 1.21 (s, 3H), 1.20 (s, 3H); 19F NMR

(470 MHz, CDCl3) δ -65.53 (t, J = 10.6 Hz, 3F); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 194.92 (s), 173.14 (s), 159.72 (s),

137.97 (s), 134.07 (s), 132.05 (s), 130.35 (s), 130.05 (s), 126.41 (s), 124.58 (s), 117.22 (s), 79.42 (s), 69.35 (s),

40.19 (q, J = 30.0 Hz), 25.38 (s), 21.53 (s). MS (ESI) m/z 409 (M+H+); HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z [M+H]+ Calcd for

C22H24F3O4 409.1627, found 409.1633.

(7t). White solid, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 6 : 1) = 0.60, 44% yield (51 mg). 1H F3CH2C

OOEt

O

NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.15 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 4.23 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.29 (q, J =

10.9 Hz, 2H), 1.60 (s, 6H), 1.23 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3) δ -66.44 (t, J = 10.5 Hz, 3F); 13C

NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 174.38, 155.60, 131.16, 126.01 (q, J = 277.0 Hz), 123.75 (q, J = 6.2 Hz), 119.20, 79.38,

61.69, 39.64 (q, J = 29.9 Hz), 25.59, 14.24. MS (EI) m/z 290 (M +); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for

C14H17F3O3 290.1130, found 290.1137.

(13a). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 6 : 1) = 0.60, 78% yield (51 mg). 1H NMR (600 MeO2C

Et

MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.96 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 2.70 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.25 (t, J

= 7.6 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.22, 149.76, 129.71, 127.90, 127.65, 51.96, 28.96, 15.23.

S11

Page 12: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

(13b). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 6 : 1) = 0.55, 46% yield (35 mg). 1H NMR MeO2C

O

(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.05 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 5.11 (dd, J = 8.3, 6.1 Hz, 2H), 4.77 (t, J =

6.4 Hz, 2H), 4.32 – 4.22 (m, 1H), 3.92 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.85, 146.76, 130.12, 128.99,

126.83, 78.41, 52.13, 40.27. MS (EI) m/z 192 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C11H12O3 192.0786,

found 192.0777.

(13c). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 6 : 1) = 0.55, 72% yield (64 mg). 1H MeO2C

CH2CO2Et

NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.00 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 4.16 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.91 (s, 3H),

3.67 (s, 2H), 1.25 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H).13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.86, 166.8, 139.29, 129.85, 129.35, 129.01,

61.10, 52.10, 41.38, 14.15. MS (EI) m/z 222 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C12H14O4 222.0892, found

222.0891.

(13d). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 6 : 1) = 0.65, 71% yield (50 mg). 1H NMR MeO2C

(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.97 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 5.95 (ddt, J = 16.9, 10.2, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 5.13

– 5.06 (m, 2H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.44 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H).13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.12, 145.51, 136.41,

129.78, 128.63, 128.10, 116.60, 52.01, 40.16. MS (EI) m/z 176 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for

C11H12O2 176.0837, found 176.0833.

(13e). Light yellow solid, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 10 : 1) = 0.60, 75% yield (97 mg). MeO2C

CF3

Ph

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (s,

1H), 7.06 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 3.28 (m, 1H), 2.57 (m, 1H), 2.38 (m, 2H), 2.22 (m, 1H). 19F NMR (376

MHz, CDCl3) δ -69.40 (s, 3F); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.68, 140.17, 139.54, 130.25, 130.03, 129.30,

128.60, 128.38, 126.89 (q, J = 191.8 Hz), 126.40, 52.25, 49.11 (q, J = 26.9 Hz), 32.38, 30.02. MS (EI) m/z 322

(M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C18H17F3O2 322.1181, found 322.1190.

(13f). Light yellow oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 10 : 1) = 0.55, 41% yield (33 mg). 1H MeO2C

CF2H

S12

Page 13: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.02 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 5.95 (tt, J = 56.3, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.92

(s, 2H), 3.20 (td, J = 17.3, 4.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.80 (s), 137.52 (s), 129.95 (s), 129.90

(s), 129.48 (s), 116.05 (t, J = 241.7 Hz), 52.18 (s), 40.82 (t, J = 22.2 Hz); 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ -114.86 (s,

2F).

(13g). Light yellow oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 10 : 1) = 0.55, 58% yield (42 mg). 1H MeO2C

CH2F

NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.99 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 4.65 (dt, J = 47.0, 6.3 Hz, 2H), 3.91

(s, 3H), 3.07 (dt, J = 24.3, 6.3 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.08 (s), 142.78 (s), 130.00 (s), 129.12

(s), 128.88 (s), 83.60 (d, J = 169.7 Hz), 52.16 (s), 37.04 (d, J = 20.6 Hz); 19F NMR (377 MHz, CDCl3) δ -216.10 (s,

1F).

(14b). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 20 : 1) = 0.60, 57% yield (48 mg). 1H NMR (600 Ph

O

MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.59 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.50 – 7.41 (m, 4H), 7.35 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H),

5.10 (dd, J = 8.4, 6.1 Hz, 2H), 4.81 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 4.31 – 4.22 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.76,

140.61, 140.07, 128.83, 127.50, 127.34, 127.28, 127.06, 78.92, 40.09. MS (EI) m/z 210 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z

[M]+ Calcd for C15H14O 210.1045, found 210.1054.

(14c). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 10 : 1) = 0.50, 87% yield (84 mg). 1H NMR Ph

CH2CO2Et

(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.56 (d, J =7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (d, J =7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.34 – 7.31 (m, 3H),

4.16 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.64 (s, 2H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.65, 140.85,

140.06, 133.22, 129.71, 128.79, 127.34, 127.29, 127.10, 60.97, 41.08, 14.24. MS (EI) m/z 240 (M+); HRMS (EI-

TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C16H16O2 240.1150, found 240.1144.

(14e). Light yellow solid, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 10 : 1) = 0.60, 90% yield (123 mg). Ph

CF3

Ph

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.61 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 4H), 7.50 – 7.42 (m, 2H), 7.39 – 7.35 (m, 3H), 7.29 (t, J = 7.5

Hz, 2H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 3.26 (m, 1H), 2.63 (m, 1H), 2.46 (m, 1H), 2.41 – 2.31

(m, 1H), 2.31 – 2.17 (m, 1H); 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ -69.18 (s, 3F); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 141.36,

140.79, 140.69, 133.59, 129.80, 129.04, 128.74, 128.64, S13

Page 14: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

127.71, 127.67, 127.32, 127.15 (q, J = 279.4 Hz), 49.03 (q, J = 26.5 Hz), 32.72, 30.34. MS (EI) m/z 340 (M+);

HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C22H19F3 340.1439, found 340.1435.

(14f). Light yellow solid, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 10 : 1) = 0.65, 75% yield (65 mg). 1H Ph

CF2H

NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.56 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 4H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.37 – 7.27 (m, 3H), 5.94 (tt, J = 56.6,

4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.16 (td, J = 17.3, 4.5 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.80 (s), 140.64 (s), 131.58 (t, J =

5.9 Hz), 130.34 (s), 128.94 (s), 127.56 (s), 127.53 (s), 127.21 (s), 116.75 (t, J = 241.5 Hz), 40.69 (t, J = 21.9 Hz);

19F NMR (377 MHz, CDCl3) δ -114.70 (s, 2F).

(14g). White solid, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 10 : 1) = 0.65, 78% yield (62 mg). 1H NMR Ph

CH2F

(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.57 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 7.2 Hz,

1H), 7.30 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 4.66 (dt, J = 47.1, 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.05 (dt, J = 23.4, 6.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz,

CDCl3) δ 141.04 (s), 139.85 (s), 136.33 (d, J = 6.2 Hz), 129.51 (s), 128.89 (s), 127.44 (s), 127.33 (s), 127.18 (s),

84.14 (d, J = 169.2 Hz), 36.71 (d, J = 20.4 Hz); 19F NMR (377 MHz, CDCl3) δ -215.25 (s, 1F).

(15b). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 20 : 1) = 0.60, 81% yield (62 mg). 1H NMR tBu

O

(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.40 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 5.08 – 5.01 (m, 2H), 4.79 (t, J = 6.4 Hz,

2H), 4.21 (p, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 1.33 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.03, 138.51, 126.58, 125.67, 79.08,

39.96, 34.52, 31.38. MS (EI) m/z 190 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C13H18O 190.1358, found

190.1366.

(15c). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 10 : 1) = 0.55, 75% yield (66 mg). 1H NMR tBu

CH2CO2Et

(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.34 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 4.15 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.58 (s, 2H), 1.31

(s, 9H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.85, 149.88, 131.12, 128.90, 125.51, 60.80,

40.90, 34.46, 31.36, 14.22. MS (EI) m/z 220 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C14H20O2 220.1463, found

220.1460.

S14

Page 15: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

(15d). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane) = 0.50, 69% yield (48 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) tBu

δ 7.32 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 5.97 (ddt, J = 16.9, 10.0, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 5.07 (dddd, J = 10.0, 4.2,

3.2, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 3.36 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.31 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 148.91, 137.64, 137.06,

128.21, 125.34, 115.64, 39.76, 34.40, 31.43. MS (EI) m/z 174 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C13H18

174.1409, found 174.1411.

(15e). Light yellow oil, TLC Rf (hexane) = 0.50, 51% yield (65 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, tBu

CF3

Ph

CDCl3) δ 7.39 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (dd, J = 14.7 Hz, 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (t, J = 7.3 Hz,

1H), 7.10 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 3.27–3.10 (m, 1H), 2.59 (m, 1H), 2.42 (m, 1H), 2.36–2.26 (m, 1H), 2.20 (m, 1H),

1.34 (s, 9H); 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ -69.70 (s, 3F); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.30, 141.01, 131.48,

128.97, 128.69, 128.64, 126.38, 125.64, 127.52 (q, J = 280.1 Hz), 48.90 (q, J = 26.5 Hz), 34.76, 32.80, 31.54,

30.38. MS (EI) m/z 320 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C20H23F3 320.1752, found 320.1760.

(15f). Light yellow oil, TLC Rf (hexane) = 0.50, 44% yield (35 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, tBu

CF2H

CDCl3) δ 7.40 (s, 2H), 7.22 (s, 2H), 5.95 (t, J = 56.6 Hz, 1H), 3.14 (t, J = 17.3 Hz, 2H), 1.35 (s, 9H); 13C NMR

(151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.62 (s), 129.67 (s), 125.84 (s), 117.02 (t, J = 241.3 Hz), 40.63 (t, J = 21.8 Hz), 34.70 (s),

31.53 (s); 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ -114.66 (dt, J = 56.7, 17.4 Hz, 2F).

(15g). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane) = 0.50, 56% yield (40 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) tBu

CH2F

δ 7.34 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 4.62 (dt, J = 47.1, 6.7 Hz, 2H), 2.99 (dt, J = 22.7, 6.7 Hz, 2H),

1.31 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 149.56 (s), 133.98 (d, J = 6.7 Hz), 128.66 (s), 125.49 (s), 84.20 (d, J =

168.7 Hz), 36.40 (d, J = 20.3 Hz), 34.44 (s), 31.38 (s); 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ -214.86 (s, 1F).

(16b). Yellow oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 4 : 1) = 0.40, 42% yield (28 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, N

O

OMe

CDCl3) δ 8.07 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (dd, J = 7.2, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 5.01 (dd, J = 8.5, 5.9 Hz,

2H), 4.81 (d, J = 13.3 Hz, 2H), 4.43 (p, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.93 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.56,

145.06, 134.94, 123.58, 116.76, 65.86, 53.36, 34.55. S15

Page 16: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

MS (EI) m/z 165 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C9H11NO2 165.0790, found 165.0788.

(16c). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 4 : 1) = 0.40, 51% yield (40 mg). 1H NMR (600 N

CH2CO2Et

OMe

MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.09 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.89 – 6.81 (m, 1H), 4.17 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H),

3.95 (s, 3H), 3.58 (s, 2H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.09, 162.12, 145.69, 139.02,

117.53, 116.71, 60.85, 53.46, 35.56, 14.20. MS (EI) m/z 195 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for

C10H13NO3 195.0895, found 195.0899.

(16d). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 4 : 1) = 0.50, 67% yield (40 mg). 1H NMR (600 N OMe

MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.03 (dd, J = 5.0, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (dd, J = 7.1, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 5.97 (ddt, J

= 16.9, 10.4, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 5.10 – 5.05 (m, 2H), 3.96 (s, 3H), 3.33 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3)

δ 161.95, 144.48, 137.62, 135.67, 122.86, 116.73, 116.28, 53.32, 33.82. MS (EI) m/z 149 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF)

m/z [M]+ Calcd for C9H11NO 149.0841, found 149.0839.

(16e). Colorless oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 5 : 1) = 0.40, 85% yield (100 mg). 1H NMR N

CF3

Ph

OMe

(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ8.16 (dd, J = 4.9, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.29 – 7.25 (m, 2H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.4

Hz, 1H), 7.07 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 6.94 (dd, J = 7.4, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 3.89 (m, 1H), 2.54 (m, 1H), 2.47 (m,

1H), 2.36 – 2.26 (m, 1H), 2.18 – 2.07 (m, 1H); 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ -69.54 (s, 3F); 13C NMR (151 MHz,

CDCl3) δ 162.64, 146.68, 128.63, 128.54, 127.14 (q, J = 280.9 Hz), 53.85, 40.54 (q, J = 26.8 Hz), 32.76, 30.39.

MS (EI) m/z 295 (M+); HRMS (EI-TOF) m/z [M]+ Calcd for C16H16 F3NO 295.1184, found 295.1180.

(16g). Yellow oil, TLC Rf (hexane: EtOAc = 5 : 1) = 0.45, 62% yield (39 mg).1H NMR (600 MHz, N

CH2F

OMe

CDCl3) δ 8.07 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (dd, J = 7.1, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (dt, J = 47.1, 6.3

Hz, 2H), 3.96 (s, 3H), 2.98 (dt, J = 23.8, 6.3 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.07 (s), 144.16 (s), 138.00

(s), 118.66 (d, J = 5.8 Hz), 115.75 (s), 81.27 (d, J = 167.4 Hz), 52.34 (s), 30.31 (d, J = 21.0 Hz); 19F NMR (377

MHz, CDCl3) δ -216.62 (s, 1F).

S16

Page 17: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Table S4. The reference literatures of reported compounds

Known Compound Number Reference

7a, 7b, 7d, 7e, 7f, 7g, 7h,

7i, 7k, 7n, 7q, 7r

Zhao, Y.; Hu, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1033.

7c Leng, F.; Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Li, J.; Zou, D.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Y.

Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 10697.

7j, 7l Xu, S.; Chen, H.-H.; Dai, J.-J.; Xu, H.-J. Org. Lett. 2014, 16,

2306.

7m Kautzky, J. A.; Wang, T.; Evans, R. W.; MacMillan, D. W. C.

J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 6522.

7p Akira, S.; Tetsuo, Y.; Hiroaki, I.; Masayuki, N.; Keiko, T.;

Noriko, O. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1986, 59, 3905.

13a Rushworth, P. J.; Hulcoop, D. G.; Fox, D. J. J. Org. Chem.

2013, 78, 9517.

13b, 13c, 13d, 13f, 14f, 15f Zhang, X.; Yang, C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 2721.

14c Xie, P.; Xie, Y.; Qian, B.; Zhou, H.; Xia, C.; Huang, H. J. Am.

Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9902.

15c Chen, Z.; Wen, Y.; Fu, Y.; Chen, H.; Ye, M.; Luo, G. Synlett

2017, 28, 981.

15d Mayer, M.; Czaplik, W. M.; Jacobi von Wangelin, A. Adv.

Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2147.

16d Struk, Ł.; Sośnicki, J. G. Synthesis 2012, 44, 735-746.

13g, 14g, 15g, 16g Yang, Y.; Cai, J.; Luo, G.; Jiang, Y.; Su, Y.; Su, Y.; Li, C.;

Zheng, Y.; Zeng, J.; Liu, Y. Org. Chem. Front. 2019, dol:

S17

Page 18: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

10.1039/C9QO00066F.

V. Copies of 1H NMR , 19F NMR and 13C NMR spectra

Figure S2. 1H NMR of 2 in d8-THF

S18

NNNi

F3CH2C CH2CF3

2

Page 19: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S3. 19F NMR of 2 in d8-THF

Figure S4. 13C NMR of 2 in d8-THF

S19

NNNi

F3CH2C CH2CF3

2

NNNi

F3CH2C CH2CF3

2

Page 20: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S5. 1H NMR of 7a in CDCl3

Figure S6. 19F NMR of 7a in CDCl3

S20

CH2CF3

Ph 7a

CH2CF3

Ph 7a

Page 21: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S7. 13C NMR of 7a in CDCl3

Figure S8. 1H NMR of 7b in CDCl3

S21

CH2CF3

tBu 7b

CH2CF3

Ph 7a

Page 22: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S9. 19F NMR of 7b in CDCl3

Figure S10. 13C NMR of 7b in CDCl3

S22

CH2CF3

tBu 7b

CH2CF3

tBu 7b

Page 23: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S11. 1H NMR of 7c in CDCl3

Figure S12. 19F NMR of 7c in CDCl3

S23

CH2CF3

MeO 7c

CH2CF3

MeO 7c

Page 24: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S13. 13C NMR of 7c in CDCl3

Figure S14. 1H NMR of 7d in CDCl3

S24

CH2CF3

MeO 7c

CH2CF3

BnO 7d

Page 25: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S15. 19F NMR of 7d in CDCl3

Figure S16. 13C NMR of 7d in CDCl3

S25

CH2CF3

BnO 7d

CH2CF3

BnO 7d

Page 26: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S17. 1H NMR of 7e in CDCl3

Figure S18. 19F NMR of 7e in CDCl3

S26

CH2CF3O

O 7e

CH2CF3O

O 7e

Page 27: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S19. 13C NMR of 7e in CDCl3

Figure S20. 1H NMR of 7f in CDCl3

S27

CH2CF3O

O 7e

CH2CF3

OHC 7f

Page 28: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S21. 19F NMR of 7f in CDCl3

Figure S22. 13C NMR of 7f in CDCl3

S28

CH2CF3

OHC 7f

CH2CF3

OHC 7f

Page 29: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S23. 1H NMR of 7g in CDCl3

Figure S24. 19F NMR of 7g in CDCl3

S29

CH2CF3

O7g

CH2CF3

O7g

Page 30: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S25. 13C NMR of 7g in CDCl3

Figure S26. 1H NMR of 7h in CDCl3

S30

CH2CF3

O7g

CH2CF3

MeO2C 7h

Page 31: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S27. 19F NMR of 7h in CDCl3

Figure S28. 13C NMR of 7h in CDCl3

S31

CH2CF3

MeO2C 7h

CH2CF3

MeO2C 7h

Page 32: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S29. 1H NMR of 7i in CDCl3

Figure S30. 19F NMR of 7i in CDCl3

S32

CH2CF3

NC 7i

CH2CF3

NC 7i

Page 33: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S31. 13C NMR of 7i in CDCl3

Figure S32. 1H NMR of 7j in CDCl3

S33

CH2CF3

NC 7i

OHC CH2CF3

7j

Page 34: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S33. 19F NMR of 7j in CDCl3

Figure S34. 13C NMR of 7j in CDCl3

S34

OHC CH2CF3

7j

OHC CH2CF3

7j

Page 35: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S35. 1H NMR of 7k in CDCl3

Figure S36. 19F NMR of 7k in CDCl3

S35

CH2CF3

O

7k

CH2CF3

O

7k

Page 36: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S37. 13C NMR of 7k in CDCl3

Figure S38. 1H NMR of 7l in CDCl3

S36

CH2CF3

O

7k

MeO2C CH2CF3

7l

Page 37: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S39. 19F NMR of 7l in CDCl3

Figure S40. 13C NMR of 7l in CDCl3

S37

MeO2C CH2CF3

7l

MeO2C CH2CF3

7l

Page 38: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S41. 1H NMR of 7m in CDCl3

Figure S42. 19F NMR of 7m in CDCl3

S38

NC CH2CF3

7m

NC CH2CF3

7m

Page 39: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S43. 13C NMR of 7m in CDCl3

Figure S44. 1H NMR of 7n in CDCl3

S39

NC CH2CF3

7m

Ph CH2CF3

7n

Page 40: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S45. 19F NMR of 7n in CDCl3

Figure S46. 13C NMR of 7n in CDCl3

S40

Ph CH2CF3

7n

Ph CH2CF3

7n

Page 41: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S47. 1H NMR of 7o in CDCl3

Figure S48. 19F NMR of 7o in CDCl3

S41

N OMe

CH2CF3

7o

N OMe

CH2CF3

7o

Page 42: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S49. 13C NMR of 7o in CDCl3

Figure S50. 1H NMR of 7p in CDCl3

S42

N OMe

CH2CF3

7o

N

CH2CF3

7p

Page 43: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S51. 19F NMR of 7p in CDCl3

Figure S52. 13C NMR of 7p in CDCl3

S43

N

CH2CF3

7p

N

CH2CF3

7p

Page 44: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S53. 1H NMR of 7q in CDCl3

Figure S54. 19F NMR of 7q in CDCl3

S44

CH2CF3

7q

CH2CF3

7q

Page 45: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S55. 13C NMR of 7q in CDCl3

Figure S56. 1H NMR of 7r in CDCl3

S45

CH2CF3

7q

CH2CF3

7r

Page 46: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S57. 19F NMR of 7r in CDCl3

Figure S58. 13C NMR of 7r in CDCl3

S46

CH2CF3

7r

CH2CF3

7r

Page 47: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S59. 1H NMR of 7s in CDCl3

Figure S60. 19F NMR of 7s in CDCl3

S47

O

F3CH2C O

O O

7s

O

F3CH2C O

O O

7s

Page 48: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S61. 13C NMR of 7s in CDCl3

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.5f1 (ppm)

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

3.23

5.98

2.00

1.92

1.90

1.91

1.22

1.23

1.25

1.58

1.60

3.26

3.28

3.30

3.31

4.21

4.22

4.24

4.25

6.81

6.82

7.15

7.16

7.26

Figure S62. 1H NMR of 7t in CDCl3

S48

O

F3CH2C O

O O

7s

F3CH2C

OOEt

O

7t

Page 49: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S63. 19F NMR of 7t in CDCl3

Figure S64. 13C NMR of 7t in CDCl3

S49

F3CH2C

OOEt

O

7t

F3CH2C

OOEt

O

7t

Page 50: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S65. 1H NMR of 13a in CDCl3

Figure S66. 13C NMR of 13a in CDCl3

S50

MeO2C

Et

13a

MeO2C

Et

13a

Page 51: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S67. 1H NMR of 13b in CDCl3

Figure S68. 13C NMR of 13b in CDCl3

S51

MeO2C

O

13b

MeO2C

O

13b

Page 52: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S69. 1H NMR of 13c in CDCl3

Figure S70. 13C NMR of 13c in CDCl3

S52

MeO2C

CH2CO2Et

13c

MeO2C

CH2CO2Et

13c

Page 53: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S71. 1H NMR of 13d in CDCl3

Figure S72. 13C NMR of 13d in CDCl3

S53

MeO2C 13d

MeO2C 13d

Page 54: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

-0.50.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.5f1 (ppm)

-2000

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

22000

24000

26000

28000

30000

32000

34000

36000

0.99

1.94

0.97

0.95

3.00

1.79

0.98

2.18

1.99

1.91

2.22

2.38

2.39

2.57

3.28

3.94

7.06

7.07

7.21

7.27

7.28

7.37

7.38

8.06

8.07

Figure S73. 1H NMR of 13e in CDCl3

Figure S74. 19F NMR of 13e in CDCl3

S54

MeO2C

CF3

Ph

13e

MeO2C

CF3

Ph

13e

Page 55: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

-100102030405060708090110130150170190210f1 (ppm)

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

1600

1700

1800

1900

30.0

232

.38

48.8

449

.02

49.2

049

.38

52.2

5

125.

6612

6.25

126.

4012

7.52

128.

3812

8.60

129.

3012

9.78

130.

0313

0.25

139.

5414

0.17

166.

68

Figure S75. 13C NMR of 13e in CDCl3

Figure S76. 1H NMR of 13f in CDCl3

S55

MeO2C

CF3

Ph

13e

MeO2C

CF2H

13f

Page 56: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S77. 19F NMR of 13f in CDCl3

Figure S78. 13C NMR of 13f in CDCl3

S56

MeO2C

CF2H

13f

MeO2C

CF2H

13f

Page 57: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S79. 1H NMR spectra of 13g in CDCl3

Figure S80. 19F NMR spectra of 13g in CDCl3

S57

CH2CH2F

MeO2C 13g

CH2CH2F

MeO2C 13g

Page 58: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S81. 13C NMR spectra of 3g in CDCl3

Figure S82. 1H NMR of 14b in CDCl3

S58

Ph

O

14b

CH2CH2F

MeO2C 13g

Page 59: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S83. 13C NMR of 14b in CDCl3

Figure S84. 1H NMR of 14c in CDCl3

S59

Ph

O

14b

Ph

CH2CO2Et

14c

Page 60: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S85. 13C NMR of 14c in CDCl3

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.510.5f1 (ppm)

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

11000

12000

13000

14000

15000

16000

170001.

041.

031.

021.

01

1.00

1.89

0.95

1.89

2.88

1.92

3.85

2.24

2.26

2.36

2.38

2.44

2.45

2.47

2.61

2.61

2.63

3.25

3.26

3.28

7.10

7.12

7.19

7.21

7.22

7.27

7.29

7.30

7.35

7.35

7.36

7.36

7.37

7.44

7.45

7.46

7.47

7.61

7.62

Figure S86. 1H NMR of 14e in CDCl3

S60

Ph

CF3

Ph

14e

Ph

CH2CO2Et

14c

Page 61: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S87. 19F NMR of 14e in CDCl3

-100102030405060708090110130150170190210f1 (ppm)

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

1600

1700

1800

190030

.16

32.5

4

48.5

948

.77

48.9

449

.12

124.

1812

6.04

126.

2912

7.14

127.

4912

7.53

127.

8912

8.46

128.

5612

8.86

140.

5114

0.61

141.

18

Figure S88. 13C NMR of 14e in CDCl3

S61

Ph

CF3

Ph

14e

Ph

CF3

Ph

14e

Page 62: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

-3-2-101234567891011f1 (ppm)

-2000

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

22000

24000

26000

28000

1.98

1.00

2.84

1.97

3.97

3.13

3.13

3.16

3.16

3.18

3.19

5.84

5.84

5.85

5.93

5.94

5.94

6.03

7.30

7.31

7.32

7.34

7.35

7.41

7.42

7.44

7.55

7.56

7.57

Figure S89. 1H NMR of 14f in CDCl3

-115.8-115.5-115.2-114.9-114.6-114.3-114.0-113.7-113.4f1 (ppm)

-20000-1000001000020000300004000050000600007000080000900001E+051E+051E+051E+051E+052E+052E+052E+052E+052E+052E+052E+052E+052E+052E+05

-114

.70

Figure S90. 19F NMR of 14f in CDCl3

S62

Ph

CH2CF2H

14f

Ph

CH2CF2H

14f

Page 63: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

0102030405060708090110130150170190210f1 (ppm)

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

40.4

840

.69

40.9

1

114.

3511

6.75

119.

15

127.

21

140.

6414

0.80

Figure S91. 13C NMR of 14f in CDCl3

Figure S92. 1H NMR of 14g in CDCl3

S63

Ph

CH2CF2H

14f

Ph

CH2CH2F

14g

Page 64: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S93. 19F NMR of 14g in CDCl3

Figure S94. 13C NMR of 14g in CDCl3

S64

Ph

CH2CH2F

14g

Ph

CH2CH2F

14g

Page 65: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S95. 1H NMR of 15b in CDCl3

Figure S96. 13C NMR of 15b in CDCl3

S65

tBu

O

15b

tBu

O

15b

Page 66: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S97. 1H NMR of 15c in CDCl3

Figure S98. 13C NMR of 15c in CDCl3

S66

tBu

CH2CO2Et

15c

tBu

CH2CO2Et

15c

Page 67: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S99. 1H NMR of 15d in CDCl3

Figure S100. 13C NMR of 15d in CDCl3

S67

tBu 15d

tBu 15d

Page 68: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

-0.50.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.5f1 (ppm)

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

1E+05

8.84

1.04

1.02

1.01

1.00

1.00

1.84

2.85

2.32

1.89

1.34

2.19

2.20

2.23

2.31

2.34

2.43

3.15

3.16

3.17

3.18

3.19

3.19

3.20

3.21

3.22

3.23

7.09

7.11

7.18

7.20

7.21

7.22

7.25

7.26

7.28

7.29

7.38

7.39

Figure S101. 1H NMR of 15e in CDCl3

Figure S102. 19F NMR of 15e in CDCl3

S68

tBu

CF3

Ph

15e

tBu

CF3

Ph

15e

Page 69: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

-100102030405060708090110130150170190210f1 (ppm)

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2200

2400

2600

2800

30.1

830

.19

31.3

432

.60

34.5

6

48.4

348

.61

48.7

948

.96

124.

6412

5.64

126.

1812

6.68

127.

9812

8.44

128.

4912

8.77

131.

3014

0.81

151.

10

Figure S103. 13C NMR of 15e in CDCl3

Figure S104. 1H NMR of 15f in CDCl3

S69

tBu

CF3

Ph

15e

tBu

CF2H

15f

Page 70: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

-160-155-150-145-140-135-130-125-120-115-110-105-100-95-90-85f1 (ppm)

-500

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

5500

6000

6500

7000-114

.79

-114

.74

-114

.69

-114

.64

-114

.59

-114

.54

Figure S105. 19F NMR of 15f in CDCl3

Figure S106. 13C NMR of 15f in CDCl3

S70

tBu

CF2H

15f

tBu

CF2H

15f

Page 71: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S107. 1H NMR of 15g in CDCl3

Figure S108. 19F NMR of 15g in CDCl3

S71

tBu

CH2F

15g

tBu

CH2F

15g

Page 72: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S109. 13C NMR of 15g in CDCl3

Figure S110. 1H NMR of 16b in CDCl3

S72

N

O

OMe

16b

tBu

CH2F

15g

Page 73: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S111. 13C NMR of 16b in CDCl3

Figure S112. 1H NMR of 16c in CDCl3

S73

N

CH2CO2Et

OMe

16c

N

O

OMe

16b

Page 74: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S113. 13C NMR of 16c in CDCl3

Figure S114. 1H NMR of 16d in CDCl3

S74

N OMe

16d

N

CH2CO2Et

OMe

16c

Page 75: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S115. 13C NMR of 16d in CDCl3

-1.5-0.50.51.52.53.54.55.56.57.58.59.510.5f1 (ppm)

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

1.08

1.04

1.03

1.09

0.99

3.00

1.01

1.99

0.95

2.45

1.01

0.97

2.12

2.14

2.32

2.33

2.47

2.48

2.54

3.90

3.91

3.92

3.94

6.93

6.94

6.94

6.95

7.06

7.07

7.26

7.64

7.65

8.16

8.16

8.16

8.17

Figure S116. 1H NMR of 16e in CDCl3

S75

N OMe

16d

N

CF3

Ph

16e

OMe

Page 76: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S117. 19F NMR of 16e in CDCl3

Figure S118. 13C NMR of 16e in CDCl3

S76

N

CF3

Ph

16e

OMe

N

CF3

Ph

16e

OMe

Page 77: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S119. 1H NMR of 16g in CDCl3

Figure S120. 19F NMR of 16g in CDCl3

S77

N

CH2F

16g

OMe

N

CH2F

16g

OMe

Page 78: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S121. 13C NMR of 16g in CDCl3

VI. Control experiments for mechanistic studies

(a) Control experiments for identifying the roles of trifluoroethyl ligands in precatalyst 2

i) Continuous NMR monitoring of (bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2 upon heating

(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2d6-DMSO

heat(bipy)Ni(F)(CH2CF3) + CH2=CF2

2 2a

The precatalyst (bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2 2 (4.6 mg) was dissolved in d6-DMSO (0.5 mL) with addition

of PhCF3 (3.0 μL) as internal standard which was loaded into a J. Young NMR tube. The solution

was heated at the indicated temperature for fixed time and then recorded by a 400M NMR

instrument. It was found that the decomposition of 2 started at a slight heating (approximately 40-50

oC) for an evolvement of CH2=CF2. When the temperature was elevated further to 60-80 oC, fast

extrusion of CH2=CF2 from 2 was observed. Attempts to fingerprint the transient

[(bipy)Ni(F)(CH2CF3)] 2a via NMR were unsuccessful which might be attributed to the mentioned

redistribution reaction to afford [(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2].

S78

N

CH2F

16g

OMe

Page 79: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S122. 1H NMR spectrums of precatalyst 2 in a variable temperature experimentamethylene peaks of precatalyst 2; bCH2=CF2 gas peaks; cbipy peaks of precatalyst 2.

S79

Page 80: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S123. 19F NMR spectrums of precatalyst 2 in a variable temperature experimentatrifluoromethyl peak of precatalyst 2; btrifluorotoluene (internal standard); cCH2=CF2 gas peaks.

ii) NMR experiments for identifying the role of trifluoroethyl groups bound to nickel

Ph B(OH)2 + OI30% (bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)

K3PO4, d6-DMSO80 oC

Ph O

NMR monitoring

4-biphenylboronic acid (0.075 mmol, 1.5 equiv), K3PO4 (0.10 mmol, 3.0 equiv), followed by a

solution of 3-iodooxetane (0.05 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and PhCF3 (0.05 mmol, internal standard for 19F

NMR) in the d6-DMSO solvent (0.5 mL) were loaded into a 25 mL of Schlenck tube which was

subject to evacuating/flushing with nitrogen gas three times. The precatalyst 2 (30.0 mol%) in the d6-

DMSO solvent (0.5 mL) was added dropwise into the reaction system subsequently (increasing the

catalyst loading for clear identification of the reaction initiation). The Schlenck tube was screw

capped and put into a preheated oil bath (80 oC). After stirring for the indicated time, the reaction

mixture was cooled to room temperature and recorded by 1H and 19F NMR. The result indicated the

gradual consumption of 3-iodooxetane, the formation of product 9b as well as the extrusion of

CH2=CF2 from precatalyst 2.S80

Page 81: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S124. 1H NMR monitoring of the synthetic reaction of product 14b amethylene peaks of precatalyst 2; a'bipy peaks of precatalyst 2; bCH2=CF2 gas peaks; c3-iodooxetane; dproduct 14b

S81

Page 82: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S125. 19F NMR monitoring of the synthetic reaction of product 14b atrifluoromethyl peak of precatalyst 2; btrifluorotoluene (internal standard); cCH2=CF2 gas peaks; dAr-CH2CF3 7a (produced from

the retained CF3CH2 group during the initiation step of catalytic cycle).

(iii) GC-MS analysis for identifying the role of trifluoroethyl groups bound to nickel

Ph B(OH)2

Ar CH2CF3

+

isolated yield 11%

OI30 mol% (bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2

K3PO4, DME, 80 oCPh O

65% isolated yield

GC-MS identified products:

m/z 64

(Ar= 4-biphenyl)

CH2=CF2

detected in the reaction system(proof for eliminative extrusion)

m/z 236

CH3OCH(Ar)CH2OCH3or its regioisomer

noticeble formationm/z 242

4-biphenylboronic acid (0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv), K3PO4 (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv), followed by a

solution of 3-iodooxetane (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in the DME solvent (0.5 mL) were loaded into a 25

mL of Schlenck tube which was subject to evacuating/flushing with nitrogen gas three times. The

precatalyst 2 (30.0 mol%) in the DME solvent (0.5 mL) was added dropwise into the reaction system

subsequently (increasing the catalyst loading for clear identification of the reaction initiation). The

Schlenck tube was screw capped and put into a preheated oil bath (80 oC). After stirring for 24 h, the

reaction mixture was cooled to room S82

Page 83: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

temperature and poured into a saturated aqueous ammonium chloride solution (10.0 mL). The

aqueous phase was extracted with ether three times (10.0 mL×3). The combined organic phase was

analyzed by GC-MS with the p-xylene internal standard. The organic phase was condensed in vacuo

to remove solvent, and the residue was purified by flash chromatography on preparative TLC to

fingerprint the ArCH2CF3 mark 7a (11% yield) and obtain the desired product 14b (65% yield).

Table S5. GC-MS analysis for probing roles of trifluoroethyl groups bound to nickel

Retention time/minute Detected species Area%

1.62 F2C CH2 Tracea

8.56 I O 3.30

12.98 Biphenyl 13.50

13.44 Bipyridine 5.77

13.80 Ph CH2CF3 2.38

17.37 CH3OCH(Ar)CH2OCH3 1.16

18.18Ph O

(desired product)12.92

aF2C=CH2 was detected in trace amount in GC-MS due to the volatility of its gaseous properties. It could be

observed clearly in 19F NMR (Figure S104).

555 #466 RT: 1.62 AV: 1 SB: 234 18.32-18.63 , 17.55-18.03 NL: 4.70E5T: + c EI Full ms [40.000-500.000]

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450m/z

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Rel

ativ

e A

bund

ance

64.02

81.25

153.22126.31 207.23165.30100.2744.03 225.46 245.57 417.26 457.49180.17 387.45148.33 270.49 316.36 484.34329.49

Figure S126. Detection of CH2=CF2 by GC-MSS83

CH2=CF2 (m/z 64) (VDF extrusion)

Page 84: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S127. Detection of the Ar-CH2CF3 mark by GC-MS

Figure S128. Detection of CH3OCH(Ar)CH2OCH3 by GC-MS

S84

Ph

CH2CF3

CH3OCH(Ar)CH2OCH3

(Ar= 4-biphenyl)

(the involvement of trifluoroethyl group in reductive elimination)

(evidence for radical intermediacy)

Page 85: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S129. Detection of the product 14b by GC-MS

(b) Evidences for solvent-caged radical reactions

i) Detection of CF3CH3 (CF3CH2 radical abstracts ethereal α-hydrogen) and

CH3OCH(Ar) CH2OCH3 to support the DME solvent-caged reactions

Table S6. GC-MS analysis of the coupling between CF3CH2I and 4-biphenylboronic acid

B(OH)2

Ph+ CF3CH2I

(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2 (5 mol%)

K3PO4, DME, 80oC, 24 hPh

CH2CF3+

CF3CH3

CH3OCH(Ar)CH2OCH3

Retention time/minute Detected species Area%

1.64 CF3CH3 Tracea

12.98 Ph-Ph 8.42

13.44 Bipy 5.02

13.81 Ph CH2CF3 17.38

14.26 Ph CHCF2 0.50

16.33 Ph I 6.94

17.37 CH3OCH(Ar)CH2OCH3 9.79aCF3CH3 was detected in trace amount in GC-MS due to the volatility of its gaseous properties.

S85

Ph O

(m/z 210, primary product)

M+-HCHO

Page 86: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

(mainlib) Ethane, 1,1,1-trifluoro-40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

0

50

100

4344

45

46 50 51 52 62 63

64

65

66

69

70 81 82 83 84 85

F

F

F

Figure S130. Detection CF3CH3 by GC-MS (CF3CH2 radical abstracts ethereal α-hydrogen)

S86

CF3CH3

Page 87: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

ii) Detection of EtOAc (EtOOCCH2 radical abstracts ethereal α-hydrogen) to support the

DME solvent-caged reactions

Table S7. GC-MS analysis of the coupling between BrCH2CO2Et and 4-biphenylboronic acid

B(OH)2

MeO2C+

(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2 (2 mol%)

K3PO4, DME, 90C, 24 hMeO2C

CH2CO2EtBrCH2CO2Et

Retention time/minute Detected species Area%4.65 CH3COOEt 1.76

10.55 MeO2C 6.36

13.22 MeO2C OH 0.41

14.83MeO2C CH2CO2Et

11.78

Figure S131. Detection of EtOAc by GC-MS (EtOOCCH2 radical abstracts ethereal α-

hydrogen)

S87

Page 88: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

(c) TEMPO radical trapping experiments

Example 1: 4-biphenylboronic acid (0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv), K3PO4 (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv), TEMPO

(0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), followed by a solution of 3-iodooxetane (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in the DME

solvent (0.5 mL) were loaded into a 25 mL of Schlenck tube which was subject to

evacuating/flushing with nitrogen gas three times. The precatalyst 2 (10.0 mol%) in the DME

solvent (0.5 mL) was added dropwise into the reaction system subsequently.

Table S8. GC-MS analysis of TEMPO radical trapping for the coupling reaction of 4-

biphenylboronic acid and 3-iodooxetane

a Radical inhibition test

Ph B(OH)210 mol% (bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2

1equiv TEMPO

1.5 equiv 1.0 equiv

Ph

K3PO4, DME, 80 oC

X+ OI O

17 (m/z 213) m/z 154 m/z 236 (trace)(deboronation)(radical trapping)

GC-MS identified species:

(Ar= 4-biphenyl)

N O OPh CH2CF3

Ph

(1)

Not Detected: CH3OCH(Ar)CH2OCH3

(precatalyst activation)

Retention time/minute Detected species Area%

8.29p-xylene(internal

standard) 14.84

8.55 3-iodooxetane 7.20

9.00 NH

0.42

10.28 N O O tracea

10.96 TEMPO 12.10

12.96 Biphenyl 16.67

13.79 Ph CH2CF3 0.07

aThis species was dectected in trace amount possibly due to its instability.

S88

Page 89: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S132. Detection of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine by GC-MS

839 #3012 RT: 10.28 AV: 1 SB: 14 10.29-10.31 , 10.25-10.26 NL: 1.55E6T: + c EI Full ms [40.000-500.000]

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450m/z

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Rel

ativ

e A

bund

ance

212.96

101.09

43.1057.09

73.15 184.99127.05 267.03227.01155.00

87.11 209.22102.08 140.97 268.05 327.00 342.03 398.90265.37 415.01389.22316.27 496.99460.90

Figure S133. Detection of 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-(oxetan-3-yloxy)piperidine by GC-MS

S89

M+-CH3

NH

M+

N O OM+

O O [M-28]+

Page 90: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S134. Detection of Ar-CH2CF3 by GC-MS (Ar= 4-biphenyl)

Example 2: 4-biphenylboronic acid (0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv), K3PO4 (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv), TEMPO

(0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), followed by a solution of CF3CH2I (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in the DMSO

solvent (0.5 mL) were loaded into a 25 mL of Schlenck tube which was subject to

evacuating/flushing with nitrogen gas three times. The precatalyst 2 (10.0 mol%) in the DMSO

solvent (0.5 mL) was added dropwise into the reaction system subsequently. The Schlenck tube was

screw capped and put into a preheated oil bath (80 oC). After stirring for 24 h, the reaction mixture

was cooled to room temperature and poured into a saturated aqueous ammonium chloride solution

(10.0 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with ether three times (10.0 mL×3). The combined

organic phase was analyzed by GC-MS with the p-xylene internal standard.

S90

M+

[M-CF3]+

Ph CH2CF3

Page 91: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Table S9. GC-MS analysis of TEMPO radical trapping for the coupling reaction of 4-

biphenylboronic acid and CF3CH2I

Ph B(OH)210 mol% (bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2

1equiv TEMPO

1.5 equiv 1.0 equiv

Ph CH2CF3

K3PO4, DMSO, 80 oC

X

18 (m/z 239) m/z 154(oxidation of aryl-nickel)

19 (m/z 170)

+ CF3CH2I

(deborylation)(radical trapping)

GC-MS identified species:

N O CH2CF3

(Ar= 4-biphenyl)

(2)

Ph OH

Ph

Retention time/minute Detected species Area%

3.79 CF3CH2I 10.92

8.31p-xylene

(internal standard) 20.27

10.41 NO

CH2CF3

3.82

10.98 TEMPO 21.93

12.98 Biphenyl 15.14

13.45 Bipyridine 0.90

15.24 Ph OH 1.51

S91

Page 92: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S135. Detection of TEMPO-CH2CF3 by GC-MS

Figure S136. Detection of biphenyl by GC-MS

Figure S137. Detection of p-hydroxybiphenyl by GC-MS

S92

m/z 239

NO

CH2CF3

Ph-Ph

p-hydroxybiphenyl

M+-CH3

Page 93: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

(c) Radical clock experiment

4-biphenylboronic acid (0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv), K3PO4 (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv), followed by a

solution of CF3CH2I (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and (1-cyclopropylvinyl)benzene (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv)

in the DMSO solvent (0.5 mL) were loaded into a 25 mL of Schlenck tube which was subject to

evacuating/flushing with nitrogen gas three times. The precatalyst 2 (10.0 mol%) in the DMSO

solvent (0.5 mL) was added dropwise into the reaction system subsequently. The Schlenck tube was

screw capped and put into a preheated oil bath (80 oC). After stirring for 24 h, the reaction mixture

was cooled to room temperature and poured into a saturated aqueous ammonium chloride solution

(10.0 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with ether three times (10.0 mL×3). The combined

organic phase was analyzed by GC-MS with the p-xylene internal standard.

Table S10. GC-MS result of radical clock experiment

Ph

1.5 eqiuv 1.0 equiv 1.0 equiv

10 mol% (bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2

K3PO4, DMSO, 80 oCCF3CH2I+ +

(substantial suppression)

20 (m/z 226)

CH2CH2CF3Ar

21 (m/z 296)

(Ar= 4-biphenyl)

Ar-B(OH)2 Ar-CH2CF3

(m/z 154)biphenyl(deborylation)

(oxidation of aryl-nickel)m/z 170

4-hydroxybiphenyl 19

GC-MS identified species:

(trifluoroethyl trapping) (insertion of aryl-nickel)

Retention time/minute Detected species Area%

3.80 CF3CH2I 7.71

8.31 p-xylene (internal standard) 16.15

11.51 12.59

11.68CH2CH2CF3

0.49

12.10(its isomer)

CH2CH2CF3

0.80

S93

Page 94: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

12.35O

1.69

12.89 (its isomer)

CH2CH2CF3

2.17

12.98 Biphenyl 11.35

13.80 Ph CH2CF3 1.71

14.26 PhCF2 0.44

15.23 Ph OH 1.46

15.57Ph

0.49

16.19(its isomer)

Ph

0.85

Figure S138. Detection of trapping of CF3CH2 radical by radical-clock

S94

CH2CH2CF3

Page 95: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S139. Detection of trapping of CF3CH2 radical by radical-clock (an isomeric product)

Figure S140. Detection of trapping of CF3CH2 radical by radical-clock (another isomer)

S95

CH2CH2CF3

isomer

CH2CH2CF3

isomer

Page 96: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S141. Detection of p-hydroxybiphenyl in radical-clock experiment

Figure S142. Detection of trapping of Aryl moiety by radical-clock

S96

p-hydroxybiphenyl

Ph

Page 97: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S143. Detection of trapping of Aryl moiety by radical-clock (an isomeric product)

(d) Questioning over Ni(0)/Ni(II) or Ni(I)/Ni(III) catalytic cycle

i) Stoichiometric reaction of 4-biphenylboronic acid and 2 for verifying Ni(0)/Ni(II) cycle

(1.0 equiv)

+2

K3PO4 (2.0 equiv)

DME, 80 oCX

Ph

CH2CF3

(no formation)

GC-MS identified products:

m/z 64

CH2=CF2

detected in reaction system(proof for eliminative extrusion)

m/z 154

deboronativeproduct

Not detected:

CF3CH2-CH2CF3

(Ar= 4-biphenyl)

Ar-CH2CF3biphenyl

(1.0 equiv)

[(bipy)Ni(CH2CF3)2]Ph

B(OH)2

-fluorineelimination

[(bipy)Ni(F)(CH2CF3)]2a

Ar-B(OH)2 [(bipy)Ni(Ar)(CH2CF3)]Ni-B transmetallation

reductiveelimination

CH2=CF2 Ar-HCH2=CF2

2b decompose+

Ar-Ar

Ni(0)

F-CH2CF3

4-biphenylboronic acid (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), K3PO4 (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv), followed by a

solution of precatalyst 2 (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in the DME solvent (1 mL) were loaded into a 25 mL

of Schlenck tube which was subject to evacuating/flushing with nitrogen gas three times. The

Schlenck tube was screw capped and put into a preheated oil bath (80 oC). After stirring for 24 h, the

reaction mixture was filtrated through a PTFE filter and analyzed by GC-MS.

Table S11. GC-MS analysis for probing the catalytic cycle of Ni(0)/Ni(II)

Retention Time/minute Detected species Area%

1.64 CF2=CF2 (m/z 64) 0.03%a

12.91 Biphenyl (m/z 154) 37.39%

aF2C=CH2 was detected in trace amount in GC-MS due to the volatility of its gaseous properties.

S97

Ph

isomer

Page 98: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

Figure S144. Detection of CH2=CF2 by GC-MS

Figure S145. Detection of debornative product biphenyl by GC-MS

S98

CH2=CF2 (m/z 64)

biphenyl (m/z 154)

Page 99: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

ii) Coupling reaction under the catalysis of Ni(I) precatalyst for verifying Ni(I)/Ni(III) cycle

Ph B(OH)210% [(bipy)NiIBr]

Ph CH2CF3K3PO4, DME

+ CF3CH2I

81% isolated yield

(2)

4-biphenylboronic acid (0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv), K3PO4 (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv), followed by a

solution of CF3CH2I (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in the DME solvent (0.5 mL) were loaded into a 25 mL

of Schlenck tube which was subject to evacuating/flushing with nitrogen gas three times. The

presumed catalyst (bipy)NiIBr (0.02 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was added into the reaction system

subsequently. The Schlenck tube was screw capped and put into a preheated oil bath (80 oC). After

stirring for 24 h, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured into a saturated

aqueous ammonium chloride solution (10.0 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with ether three

times (10.0 mL×3). After removing the solvent in vacuo, the residue was purified by flash

chromatography on silica gel to afford the corresponding ArCH2CF3 product (38 mg, isolated yield

81%).

iii) Procedure for the preparation of [(bipy)NiIBr]

[(bipy)NiIBr]NiBr2 + bipy (bipy)NiIIBr2

Ni(COD)2 bipy (bipy)Ni0(COD)+purple

green

black

Analogous to the preparation method of (dppf)Ni(I)Cl of Hazari group (Guard, L. M.; Mohadjer 

Beromi, M.; Brudvig, G. W.; Hazari, N.; Vinyard, D. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 13352.),

the presumed catalyst [(bipy)NiIBr] was prepared according to the following procedure. To a THF

solution (5.0 mL) of bipyridine (0.5 mmol) was added nickel(II) bromide (0.5 mmol) and the

reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The reaction mixture exhibited a

suspended solution of green color. Meanwhile, a reaction mixture of Ni(COD)2 (0.5 mmol) and

bipyridine (0.5 mmol) in the solution of THF was also stirred at room temperature for 24 h to

accomplish the coordination step (a purple solution was formed). The two reaction solutions were

combined together and stirred at room temperature for an extra 24 h. A dark black precipitate was

produced in the combined reaction solution and was filtrated. The black solid was washed with ether

(10.0 mL) and pentane (10.0 mL), and dried in vacuo to furnish the presumed [(bipy)NiIBr] as a dark

black powder (271 mg, Estimated Yield 92%). The insolubility of presumed catalyst [(bipy)NiIBr] in

organic solvent made NMR charaterization failed. Thus, XPS (X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy)

and IR were used to characterize the presumable [(bipy)NiIBr]. The XPS of [(bipy)NiIBr] illustrated

S99

Page 100: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

the peaks corresponding to Ni(I) at 855.486 eV which was negatively shifted by 0.214 eV in

comparison with a known K2[Ni(I)(CN)3] (Ni(I) at 855.70 eV) (Figure S123). The IR spectra of

[(bipy)NiIBr] (KBr pellets method) showed strong absorption bands in the ranges of 1599-1441 cm−1

for the stretching mode of pyridine ring, which were blue shifted toward higher frequency as

compared to the free bipyridine.

Figure S146. XPS (X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy) analysis of [(bipy)NiIBr]

50

12

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

cm-1

%T

757.52cm-1

1453.12cm-1

1578.84cm-11415.17cm-1

1557.40cm-1

1039.74cm-11249.67cm-1

619.04cm-11084.57cm-1

992.76cm-1

652.70cm-11138.60cm-11063.65cm-1

1211.71cm-13053.37cm-11964.11cm-1

893.00cm-11268.68cm-11869.97cm-11987.71cm-12290.52cm-13084.79cm-1 1800.56cm-1

2977.10cm-13006.25cm-1

2550.99cm-1

2923.28cm-1

1694.21cm-13410.57cm-1

1665.41cm-1

3149.81cm-1

403.19cm-13663.17cm-1

3684.29cm-13697.65cm-1

3775.09cm-13812.49cm-1

3830.22cm-1

3847.93cm-13912.46cm-1

Figure S147. IR spectra of 2,2'-bipyridine

S100

Page 101: 0DWHULDO (6, IRU&KHPLFDO6FLHQFH Precatalyst Ligand in ... · of CF3CH2I (0.740 g, 3.52 mmol in 10 mL of THF) were added to the flask. The reaction mixture The reaction mixture was

88

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

74

76

78

80

82

84

86

cm-1

%T

1441.10cm-1

1598.99cm-1762.64cm-1

3412.03cm-1

1023.27cm-12923.90cm-11471.59cm-1

734.81cm-11166.19cm-1

1155.65cm-1

3102.94cm-13067.23cm-1

1574.24cm-12853.76cm-1 1315.25cm-1

1057.44cm-11104.43cm-1 654.23cm-1

419.79cm-1634.65cm-11491.11cm-11043.19cm-11246.92cm-1

906.62cm-1

Figure S148. IR spectra of [(bipy)NiIBr

S101