“Toward a GOOS glider programme: Tools and methods” General Assembly
09/06/09 GOOS Regional alliances NEAR - North-East Asian Regional-GOOS Japan – Seto Inland Sea –...
-
Upload
gerald-cobb -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
2
Transcript of 09/06/09 GOOS Regional alliances NEAR - North-East Asian Regional-GOOS Japan – Seto Inland Sea –...
GOOS Regional alliances
NEAR - North-East Asian Regional-GOOS
Japan – Seto Inland Sea – several HAB species
Korea – blooms of Cochlodinium polykrikoides
GOOS-AfricaBenguela area
EuroGOOS
BOOS - Baltic Sea Operational Oceanographic System examples:a) blooms of HAB-cyanobacteria
NOOS - North West Shelf Operational Oceanographic Systemexamples:a) Skagerrak-Kattegat blooms of fish killing flagellates, e.g. Pseudochattonella farcimen.b) UK waters with blooms of the fish killing dinoflagellate Karenia mikimotoi
IBI-ROOS - Iberia-Biscay-Ireland Regional Operational Oceanographic Systemexamples:a) Blooms of Dinophysis spp. in Galician Rias, Irish waters and in the Bay of Biscay.b) Blooms of Karenia mikimotoi in the Bay of Biscay and in Irish waters US-GOOS
IOC-IPHAB recommended procedures for automated and
semi-automated HAB-monitoring and forecasting within
the Global Ocean Observing System
Table of content
Operational requirements
Acronyms and definitions
1. Harmful Algal Blooms
2. Automated HAB-observations
3. In situ systems
4. Optical techniques for observing HABs
5. Other methods for automated in situ
identification of HAB-species
6. In situ sensors for detecting algal bloom
physiological processes
7. Remote sensing systems
8. HAB-forecasting systems
9. HAB-warnings
10. GOOS Regional alliances identified for the
first HAB observation and forecasting
systems
Automated HAB-observations
Only some HABs can be monitored using automated techniques
There is value in monitoring for HAB species occurrence as well as for HAB-
toxins/metabolites.
The observing system should be designed to detect the HAB species that occur
within a given region. No single system will work in all areas.
Optical in situ techniques for observing HABs
Absorbtion and scatterring
Fluorescence – photoquenching is an issue – use night-time measurements if possible
Chlorophyll
Phycocyanin
Phycoerythrin
ALEC
Chelsea
Wetlabs
TriOS
Turner Designs
HOBI labs
In situ systems continued
Important issues
Bio fouling protection and short service intervals
Depth resolution hiigh enough to detect HABs in
thin layers - use profiling systems
Minimum set of parameters
Phytoplankton biomass proxy , i.e. night-time
chlorophyll fluorescence
Turbidity
Salinity
Temperature
Specific HAB sensor if available (based on e.g.
specific optical signature, molecular
techniques or in situ flow cytometers with
optical image analysis)
Other methods for automated in situ
identification of HAB-species
Molecular biological techniques Automated image analysis in flow cytometers
Sosik & Olson 2007
Environmental SamplePprocessorhttp://www.mbari.org/ESP/default.htm
Remote sensing systems
Systems mainly aimed at estimating chlorophyll (a proxy for total phytoplankton)
near surface
Only a few HABs can be identified using remote sensing techniques
Remote sensing is useful for tracking advection of water masses
MERIS image processed by SMHI (Envisat, European Space Agency)
Bloom of cyanobacteria in the Baltic Proper 2008
MERIS image processed by Norwegian Institute for Water Research
Chlorophyll a in the Skagerrak
Observation data ordered from high detail to
high spatial and temporal coverage
Water samples
Microscopic analyses
Cell counts
Biovolume meaurements – biomass in carbon
Species identification using molecular techniqus
Chlorophyll a – a proxy for total phytoplankton biomass
Sensors on CTD:s, buoys, gliders, in FerryBox systems etc.
Chlorophyll a fluorescence – another proxy for phytoplankton
biomass
Phycocyanin fluorescence – a proxy for some cyanobacteria
Phycoerythrin fluorescence - a proxy for some HABs
Remote sensing
Chlorophyll a near surface
Detection of a few HAB-organisms, e.g. accumulations of
cyanobacteria
Members
IPHAB Task Team on HAB Observations and Forecasting Systems
Task Team members as decided by IPHAB
XIII
Bengt Karlson, Sweden
Patrick Gentien, France
Robin Raine, Ireland
(Chair of the IOC/SCOR Programme GEOHAB)
Members who have joined during the
intersessional period
Stewart Bernard, South Africa
Milton Campbell, Brazil
Steve Groom, United Kingdom
Liam Fernand, United Kingdom
Seppo Kaitala, Finland
Raphe Kudela, USA
Thomas C. Malone, USA
Tetsuo Yanagi, Japan
Proposed members
Susan Blackburn, Australia
Joji Ishizaka, Japan
Gemita Pizarro, Chile