08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

download 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

of 12

Transcript of 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

  • 8/12/2019 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

    1/12

    Soc Classification level

    1 Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date

    Basic RF optimizationWhat is possible to do with PM counters?

  • 8/12/2019 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

    2/12

    Soc Classification level

    2 Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date

    Bad downlink vs good downlink, live networkexample

    0

    10000000

    20000000

    30000000

    40000000

    50000000

    60000000

    70000000

    100589 100953

    Sum of M8010C036 UE Reported CQI Level 00

    Sum of M8010C037 UE Reported CQI Level 01

    Sum of M8010C038 UE Reported CQI Level 02

    Sum of M8010C039 UE Reported CQI Level 03

    Sum of M8010C040 UE Reported CQI Level 04Sum of M8010C041 UE Reported CQI Level 05

    Sum of M8010C042 UE Reported CQI Level 06

    Sum of M8010C043 UE Reported CQI Level 07

    Sum of M8010C044 UE Reported CQI Level 08

    Sum of M8010C045 UE Reported CQI Level 09

    Sum of M8010C046 UE Reported CQI Level 10

    Sum of M8010C047 UE Reported CQI Level 11

    Sum of M8010C048 UE Reported CQI Level 12

    Sum of M8010C049 UE Reported CQI Level 13

    Sum of M8010C050 UE Reported CQI Level 14

    Sum of M8010C051 UE Reported CQI Level 15

    BTS

    Data

    CQI = 14

    Good DL coverage

    Fairly bad DL

    coverage (or DL

    interference)

  • 8/12/2019 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

    3/12

    Soc Classification level

    3 Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date

    Bad uplink coverage vs good uplink coverage, livenetwork example

    0

    50000

    100000

    150000

    200000

    250000

    300000

    350000

    400000

    450000

    500000

    100589 100953

    Sum of M8005C054 UE Power Headroom for

    PUSCH Level 1

    Sum of M8005C055 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 2

    Sum of M8005C056 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 3

    Sum of M8005C057 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 4

    Sum of M8005C058 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 5

    Sum of M8005C059 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 6

    Sum of M8005C060 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 7

    Sum of M8005C061 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 8

    Sum of M8005C062 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 9

    Sum of M8005C063 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 10

    Sum of M8005C064 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 11

    Sum of M8005C065 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 12

    Sum of M8005C066 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 13

    Sum of M8005C067 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 14

    Sum of M8005C068 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 15

    Sum of M8005C069 UE Power Headroom forPUSCH Level 16

    Sum of M8005C070 UE Power Headroom forBTS

    Data

    UE Power Headroom: --

    1dB

  • 8/12/2019 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

    4/12

    Soc Classification level

    4 Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date

    UL Power Headroom

    For PUSCH, subframeipower headroom is:

    UL power headroom presents the available UE txpower

    Note: negative values allowed max UE tx powerTable below shows UE reporting range

    )()()()())((log10)(TFO_PUSCHPUSCH10CMAX

    ifiPLjjPiMPiPH

    Reported value Measured quantity value (dB)

    POWER_HEADROOM_0 -23 PH -22

    POWER_HEADROOM_1 -22 PH -21

    POWER_HEADROOM_2 -21 PH -20

    POWER_HEADROOM_3 -20 PH -19

    POWER_HEADROOM_4 -19 PH -18

    POWER_HEADROOM_5 -18 PH -17

    POWER_HEADROOM_61 38 PH 39

    POWER_HEADROOM_62 39 PH 40

    POWER_HEADROOM_63 PH 40

  • 8/12/2019 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

    5/12

    Soc Classification level

    5 Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date

    Transmission share, PDSCH

    0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    12.00

    14.00

    16.00

    18.00

    20.00

    MCS1

    MCS2

    MCS3

    MCS4

    MCS5

    MCS6

    MCS7

    MCS8

    MCS9

    MCS10

    MCS11

    MCS12

    MCS13

    MCS14

    MCS15

    MCS16

    MCS17

    MCS18

    MCS19

    MCS20

    MCS21

    MCS22

    MCS23

    MCS24

    MCS25

    MCS26

    MCS27

    MCS28

    Cell1

    Cell2

    Cell3

    DL MCS distr ibutions

    Share of DL Traffic per MCS

    0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    12.00

    14.00

    16.00

    18.00

    20.00

    MCS0

    MCS1

    MCS2

    MCS3

    MCS4

    MCS5

    MCS6

    MCS7

    MCS8

    MCS9

    MCS10

    MCS11

    MCS12

    MCS13

    MCS14

    MCS15

    MCS16

    MCS17

    MCS18

    MCS19

    MCS20

    MCS21

    MCS22

    MCS23

    MCS24

    MCS25

    MCS26

    MCS27

    MCS28

    Cell1

    Cell2

    Cell3

    . Transmission share per MCS startswith MCS1, having 28 categories for

    MCS. MCS 0 is missing.

    MCS 10 and 17 are used very

    seldom.

    In most cases higher MCSs carry

    more traffic compared to

    transmission share of those.

    However, in some cells the there is

    opposite trend (could be due to

    different MIMO mode distribution?)

    0.00

    10.00

    20.00

    30.00

    40.00

    50.00

    60.00

    70.00

    80.00

    OL div OL spatial mux

    Cell1

    Cell2

    Cell3

  • 8/12/2019 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

    6/12

    Soc Classification level

    6 Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date

    UL MCS distr ibutionsTransmission share, PUSCH

    0.00

    10.00

    20.00

    30.00

    40.00

    50.00

    60.00

    70.00

    80.00

    90.00

    MCS

    0

    MCS

    1

    MCS

    2

    MCS

    3

    MCS

    4

    MCS

    5

    MCS

    6

    MCS7

    MCS

    8

    MCS

    9

    MCS

    10

    MCS

    11

    MCS

    12

    MCS

    13

    MCS

    14

    MCS

    15

    MCS

    16

    MCS

    17

    MCS

    18

    MCS

    19

    MCS

    20

    MCS

    21

    MCS

    22

    MCS

    23

    MCS

    24

    MCS

    25

    MCS

    26

    MCS

    27

    MCS

    28

    Cell1

    Cell2

    Cell3

    Share of UL Traffic per MCS

    0.00

    10.00

    20.00

    30.00

    40.00

    50.00

    60.00

    70.00

    80.00

    90.00

    100.00

    MCS0

    MCS1

    MCS2

    MCS3

    MCS4

    MCS5

    MCS6

    MCS7

    MCS8

    MCS9

    MCS10

    MCS11

    MCS12

    MCS13

    MCS14

    MCS15

    MCS16

    MCS17

    MCS18

    MCS19

    MCS20

    Cell1

    Cell2

    Cell3

    Maximum MCS is used mostly in UL. Inthis case, having higer MCSs available in

    UL would bring capacity gain.

  • 8/12/2019 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

    7/12

    Soc Classification level

    7 Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date

    UE Tx power

    Level1: -23-21dB => UE tx power

    Level31: 37..39dB

    UE Power Headroom

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    Level1

    Level2

    Level3

    Level4

    Level5

    Level6

    Level7

    Level8

    Level9

    Level10

    Level11

    Level12

    Level13

    Level14

    Level15

    Level16

    Level17

    Level18

    Level19

    Level20

    Level21

    Level22

    Level23

    Level24

    Level25

    Level26

    Level27

    Level28

    Level29

    Level30

    Level31

    Level32

    Cell1

    Cell2

    Cell3

  • 8/12/2019 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

    8/12

    Soc Classification level

    8 Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date

    Cell load, PRBs

    Utilization is either very low (

  • 8/12/2019 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

    9/12

    Soc Classification level

    9 Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date

    CQI vs. MCS/MIMO distributionUE reported CQI per level

    0

    10,000

    20,000

    30,000

    40,000

    50,000

    60,000

    Level0

    0

    Level0

    1

    Level0

    2

    Level0

    3

    Level0

    4

    Level05

    Level0

    6

    Level07

    Level0

    8

    Level0

    9

    Level1

    0

    Level1

    1

    Level1

    2

    Level1

    3

    Level1

    4

    Level15

    Cell1

    Cell2

    Cell3

    Transmission share, PDSCH

    0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    12.00

    14.00

    MCS1

    MCS2

    MCS3

    MCS4

    MCS5

    MCS6

    MCS7

    MCS8

    MCS9

    MCS10

    MCS11

    MCS12

    MCS13

    MCS14

    MCS15

    MCS16

    MCS17

    MCS18

    MCS19

    MCS20

    MCS21

    MCS22

    MCS23

    MCS24

    MCS25

    MCS26

    MCS27

    MCS28

    Cell1

    Cell2

    Cell3

    0.00

    10.00

    20.00

    30.00

    40.00

    50.00

    60.00

    70.00

    80.00

    OL div OL spatial mux

    Cell1

    Cell2

    Cell3

  • 8/12/2019 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

    10/12

    Soc Classification level

    10 Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date

    Reporting Suite RL10 example

    Need NetAct OSS

    Period start time PLMN NameCell Avail Cell Avail excl BLU MO_S att MT att MO_D att Others att RRC SSR Rel SR Stp att Data stp SR Data SR Data DR

    LTE_5750A LTE_5239A LTE_5232A LTE_523 LTE_5234A LTE_5235A LTE_5218 LTE_521 LTE_522 LTE_5116 LTE_5003A LTE_5117 LTE_5004

    03.08.2011 NTN 92.02 96.30 71 8 359 0 99.32 786 50.25 549 100.00 96.26 3.74

    03.09.2011 NTN 95.65 100.00 247 230 872 0 98.89 2 244 54.32 1 741 99.20 97.69 2.31

    03.10.2011 NTN 95.55 99.94 400 41 1 121 0 94.88 1 952 55.48 2 466 97.49 86.57 13.43

    03.11.2011 NTN 95.61 99.91 3 820 64 1 256 0 42.35 2 637 73.23 3 016 99.67 93.72 6.28

    03.12.2011 NTN 95.65 100.00 1 23 687 0 94.66 673 61.96 670 100.00 62.24 37.76

    03.13.2011 NTN 95.65 100.00 0 0 0 0 0 0

    03.14.2011 NTN 95.61 100.00 1 142 133 4 117 0 87.30 4 860 75.39 8 799 98.42 90.83 9.1703.15.2011 NTN 94.99 99.30 2 193 35 7 358 0 82.95 7 980 90.65 10 227 98.69 97.44 2.56

    03.16.2011 NTN 91.30 95.20 2 051 39 9 680 0 82.12 9 881 91.84 10 063 99.72 98.12 1.88

    03.17.2011 NTN 91.68 95.66 2 504 59 6 518 0 81.51 8 092 81.14 7 603 99.72 96.57 3.43

    03.18.2011 NTN 91.65 95.59 1 527 3 7 937 0 88.87 9 115 85.09 11 825 99.04 98.19 1.81

    03.19.2011 NTN 91.68 95.65 615 0 8 574 0 98.05 9 010 93.50 8 607 99.98 99.60 0.40

    03.20.2011 NTN 91.68 95.65 645 0 8 785 0 97.01 9 150 93.28 8 876 99.97 99.58 0.42

    03.21.2011 NTN 91.67 95.65 826 0 10 858 0 93.39 9 353 93.49 9 594 99.75 98.97 1.03

    Cell Availability RRC connections Radio Bearer

    example_rs_report_RL10.xls

  • 8/12/2019 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

    11/12

    Soc Classification level

    11 Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date

    KPI reporter example

    The counter data is stored in iOMS xmlfilesBU directory

    https://isource.access.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/projects/kpireporter/

    https://isource.access.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/projects/kpireporter/https://isource.access.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/projects/kpireporter/
  • 8/12/2019 08_d Basic RF Optimization Based on Counters

    12/12

    Soc Classification level

    12 Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date

    Some PM obstacles RL10/RL20

    No Timing Advance statistics

    Cannot identify overshooting cells No PRACH statistics for discarded preambles due to

    excessive distance Cannot troubleshoot PRACH problems for overshooting cells

    No active state (scheduled) UE/cell throughput

    Not possible to directly tell actual per-tti UE/cell tput as in HSDPA No UL noise rise measurement

    Radio drop reasons not identified in counters No TA timer expiry or Radio Link Failure counters (just generic radio

    drop counter) Emil needed for detailed drop call analysis

    No bearer holding time available (directly) cannot calculateradio drops per minuteAlways-on applications reserve bearers for long time and even a few

    drops can result in poor-looking drop ratio

    Minutes per drop might be a better KPI..