#089, In Practice, May/June 2003
-
Upload
hmi-holistic-management-international -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
6
description
Transcript of #089, In Practice, May/June 2003
Iwrote my first contract at age 16. I had
loaned a friend $500 to “tide her over”
until she got a job. In the contract, I stated
the possessions she owned that I would
receive if she didn’t pay back her debt; they
were not worth $500. That was only one of
many mistakes I made in creating that
contract. But, perhaps the biggest mistake I
made when I signed that agreement was not
taking seriously the document and the
ramifications it would have on our friendship.
In the years that followed, the debt was
not repaid in full and the friendship withered
under the lack of trust that resulted from an
ill-conceived document that was ultimately the
result of youthful naivete. I feel lucky that this
mistake cost so little as I have heard stories of
similar scenarios where the stakes were much
higher and the social costs greater.
I have thought about those lessons as I’ve
prepared my will and agreed to be a part of
someone else’s. I don’t want to fall into the
trap of just filling in the spaces without
thinking about the bigger picture of what I
am legally and morally committing to—the
social, economic, and environmental legacy
I am leaving behind.
With a will or estate plan, you are dictating
actions for a yet undetermined moment when
many things are likely to be quite different
than the future you currently picture. In turn,
such dictating can profoundly affect people’s
lives in many different ways. Often in ways
you couldn’t foresee.
Perhaps that is why people shy away from
creating wills and estate plans. They can be
tricky things to do well even with competent
legal and accounting help. However, I believe
that people’s clarity about what they want
and their willingness to discuss those options
with those involved will limit the outcome
of any estate planning more than any laws.
While my not so youthful naivete may
be surfacing with that statement, I would
challenge you to look at all the options and
tools available to you, and to answer the
following questions before focusing on the
legal restrictions: “What do I really want to
leave as a legacy, rather than what I think I
should leave as a legacy?” “What would be the
consequences from such a decision?” “How do
I feel about those consequences?” “What are
the options available to me?”
Asking myself those questions has been a
really eye-opening experience for me as I’ve
created and been involved with wills and
estate plans. For example, discussions about
guardianship of children or ownership of
property have uncovered assumptions about
family obligations and privilege, and led to
productive exploration of values, feelings, and
creative options.
Even after you have created a will that
fulfills all the “legal” requirements and family
wishes, there may be many questions that
arise from such discussions or as people
continue to think about the ramifications of
a will or a more involved estate plan. In that
way a will or estate plan is just a starting
point, not an end point in planning. It’s like a
financial plan that you monitor and control.
Holistic planning (whether financial, land,
grazing, estate, or whatever) is about keeping
the big picture in mind and looking at the
social, economic, and environmental
consequences of that planning and the
management that will bring that plan to
fruition. It is an opportunity to step back
from day-to-day management and evaluate
relationships, events, interests, and myriad other
factors in the context of your holistic goal.
That’s the powerful thing about holistic
planning. It encourages us to look at reality,
evaluate our role in the present, explore
options with those important to us, and
determine how we can create the future we
want for our whole. I can’t imagine a greater
gift to our children and communities than the
kind of contributions that come from a life
well-lived and a legacy well-planned.
in t h is I s su e
The West Ranch—A Legacy Born
Ann Adams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
The Impact of Planned Giving
Lee Dueringer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Where There’s a Will, There’s a Way
Noel McNaughton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
LAND & LIVESTOCK—A specialsection of IN PRACTICEOn the Trigg Ranch—Tough Challenges,
Big Possibilities
Jim Howell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
Grazing Planning Practicalities in the
Dry, Cold Steppes
Jim Howell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
Savory Center Bulletin Board . . . . . . .13
Savory Center Supporters . . . . . . . . . .15
Certified Educators . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
Marketplace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Planned giving is more than just
allocating assets. When David West
left his ranch to the Savory Center, he
provided us many new opportunities
to fulfill our mission. In this picture
Allan Savory and West Ranch Manager
Joe Maddox complete work on transect
monitoring as part of the Savory Center’s
management contract with the estate.
To read more about the Savory Center's
plans for this facility turn to page 2.
Holistic Estate Planningby Ann Adams
MAY / JUNE 2003 NUMBER 89
HOLISTICMANAGEMENT IN PRACTIC EP r oviding the link between a healthy environment and a sound economy
2 HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE #89
The David West Ranch of Ozona, Texas
arrived unexpectedly at the Savory
Center’s doorstep in the fall of 2001,
and I think it would be safe to say that
neither the Savory Center nor the West Ranch
will ever be the same again. While we will
share many stories about the West Ranch in
future issues of IN PRACTICE, this article
focuses on how David West’s planned gift
has already created a legacy.
Building From the Ground Up
In 1991, David West wrote a will that
named the Savory Center as the recipient of
his estate. In 2001, when he died, that estate,
including his 11,000+ acre ranch, was worth
approximately $6.5 million. He wanted the
Savory Center to use that estate to create a
Holistic Management research and education
facility. Although the estate remains in
probate, the Savory Center began working
toward fulfilling David West’s vision through a
management contract with the estate executor,
The Allan Savory
Center for Holistic Management
The ALLAN SAVORY CENTER FOR
HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT is a 501(c) (3)
non-profit organization. The center works
to restore the vitality of communities and
the natural resources on which they
depend by advancing the practice of
Holistic Management and coordinating
its development worldwide.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Rio de la Vista, ChairAllan Savory, Vice-ChairLeslie Christian, SecretaryGary Rodgers, Treasurer
Richard SmithManuel Casas
ADVISORY BOARD
Robert Anderson, Chair, Corrales, NMSam Brown, Austin, TX
Leslie Christian, Portland, ORGretel Ehrlich, Gaviota, CA
Cynthia & Leo Harris, Albuquerque, NMTrudy Healy, Taos, NMClint Josey, Dallas, TX
Dianne Law, Laveta, CODoug McDaniel, Lostine, OR
Guillermo Osuna, Coahuila, MexicoJim Parker, Montrose, CO
Dean William Rudoy, Cedar Crest, NMYork Schueller, El Segundo, CA
Jim Shelton, Vinita, OKRichard Smith, Houston, TX
FOUNDERS
Allan Savory
Jody Butterfield
STAFF
Tim LaSalle, Executive Director; Shannon
Horst, Senior Director, Strategic Projects Kate Bradshaw, Director of Finance andAdministration; Kelly Pasztor, Director of Educational Services; Lee Dueringer,
Director of Development; Ann Adams,
Managing Editor, IN PRACTICE andMembership and Educator SupportCoordinator , Craig Leggett, Special ProjectsManager; Mary Child, U.S. Education Programand Case Study Development Coordinator;Constance Neely, Director of InternationalTraining Programs Development; Jessica
Stolz, Bookkeeper.
Africa Centre for Holistic Management
Private Bag 5950, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwetel: (263) (11) 213529; email:[email protected] Matanga, Director; Roger Parry,
Manager, Regional Training Centre; Elias
Ncube, Hwange Project Manager/TrainingCoordinator
HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE (ISSN:
1098-8157) is published six times a year by The
Allan Savory Center for Holistic Management,
1010 Tijeras NW, Albuquerque, NM 87102,
505/842-5252, fax: 505/843-7900; email:
website: www.holisticmanagement.org
Copyright © 2003.
Ad definitumfinem
The West Ranch—A Legacy Bornby Ann Adams
including hiring Savory Center and HRM of
Texas members, Joe & Peggy Maddox, as
Ranch Manager and Director of Education.
When the Savory Center took over
management, the West Ranch was an example
of a common ranching philosophy in West
Texas: “you can’t ranch without oil or gas.”
Gas revenues had increased wealth for the
West Ranch while the land base continued
to deteriorate.
So, one of the first assignments for Joe
Maddox and intern Tom Redfern from
Australia was to gather baseline monitoring
data from 11 transects. That monitoring
indicated that approximately 68 percent of the
soil is bare with 70 percent mature capping;
40 percent of the grasses are overrested and
49 percent are dying. Predominant plants
include prickly pear and redberry cedar, both
low successional plants. In other words, there’s
lots of room for improvement.
Luckily, that’s just the kind of ranch the
Savory Center wanted. And its location in
The Savory Center has been blessed
with many kind and generous
members. Many of you have
responded to our annual appeal for donations
after determining the amount you can afford
in a given year. But you may not be aware
of the increased impact you can make by
considering a planned gift, beyond your
usual donation.
Like any other large decision, we
encourage you to discuss these ideas with the
professionals you hire and with those who
are connected to those funds. Such planning
should be a time of collaboration, not conflict.
To help you decide which option might be
best for you, here is a brief summary of the
different types of gift. After reading through
them, please fill out the form at the right and
send it to us in the enclosed envelope so we
can better serve you.
• Cash—Still the Simplest - Gifts of cash are
fully deductible—up to a maximum of 50
percent of your adjusted gross income.
Moreover, some employers will match your
charitable gifts, meaning your gifts are worth
even more. Check to see if your company or
firm has a matching gift program, or would
be willing to create one.
• Gifts of Life Insurance - If you own a life
insurance policy, consider giving the policy
as a charitable gift. To receive a charitable
deduction, name The Savory Center as both
the owner and beneficiary of that policy. If
the policy has a cash value, you can take a
charitable deduction approximately equal to
the cash value at the time of the gift.
• Gifts of Real Estate - Many members of
The Savory Center own farms and ranches
that may be sold in the next generation, or
that are now returning limited income. Gifts
can be made outright, as a bequest, or placed
in an income-producing trust to benefit the
The Impact of Planned Giving
by Lee Dueringer
HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE • MAY / JUNE 2003 3
Texas was an added benefit because we
could more actively collaborate with HRM
of Texas, a collaboration that has benefited
both organizations immensely in fulfilling
their missions.
Peggy Jones, Executive Director of HRM
of Texas, says “the West Ranch is one of the
most exciting things to happen to HRM of
TX in years. This is a grand opportunity to
experience Holistic Management put to the
test by starting from scratch on poor land in
a very dry climate. It has given us a place to
meet in that part of the state, and thus has
greatly improved the sense of community
between HRM of TX and the ranchers and
agency people in that area. Even our kinship
with the Savory Center has blossomed over
our common affection for and interest in
the West Ranch.”
That collaboration has already resulted in
a handful of planning meetings and field
days, necessary during this transition time for
the ranch and also for providing a learning
opportunity for our members and the local
community. The foundation for these
meetings is the West Ranch holistic goal as
we all work to determine the best way to
improve the land base and infrastructure.
This focus is essential if the West Ranch is
ranchers and university and government
officials, David West’s vision of his ranch as a
research and educational center for Holistic
Management is already thriving—even before
the distribution of his estate.
David West’s gift has increased The
Savory Center’s asset base, which in turn
gives us more leverage on numerous projects
and offers us more flexibility in our funding.
Likewise, his gift helped us move toward our
vision of managing more learning sites
where we have ownership of the property
so we can have the decision-making power
to provide a learning environment that
demonstrates what people can achieve
with Holistic Management.
Like the Africa Centre for Holistic
Management in Zimbabwe, the West Ranch
will be a place where we can improve the
land base, help the local community thrive,
and offer assistance to interns, and visitors
who seek solutions to the challenging issues
we face as people concerned about the
environment and the health of rural
communities. And as we have watched the
Africa Centre’s influence grow in its
community, so too will we see David West’s
gift continue to grow and expand, touching
many lives for years to come.
to successfully transition from a ranch
dependent on gas revenues to one that
thrives from the sustainable wealth based on
the photosynthetic process (currently that
means leasing out “pasture” and hunting).
Fulfilling the Vision
With current plans for another HRM of
TX field day on June 14, more interns from
the U.S. and Mexico to arrive in late spring or
early summer, an ongoing invitation to the
Ozona public schools and the local 4-H to
use the West Ranch as an outdoor education
site, and continued involvement of local
Peggy Maddox, Allan Savory, and Joe
Maddox at HRM of TX field day .
donor during his or her life.
• Appreciated Stocks or Bonds - If you own
stock, it is almost always worth more tax-wise to
contribute stock than cash. Giving the stock means
the donor receives both an income tax charitable
deduction for the full market value of the stock at
the time of the gift and avoids paying the capital
gains tax on the increased value of the stock.
• Bequests - Deferred giving is important in
building a long-term endowment for The Savory
Center. Many of you have already advised The
Savory Center that we will be receiving a bequest
in your will. Doing so allows donors and their
families to gain all the benefits of the bequest
property or cash during life, with The Savory
Center receiving the property or cash only after
their passing.
• Life Income Gifts - With money market rates
at a low and many stocks paying less than one
percent in dividends, your gift of cash or stock to
The Savory Center, made in the form of a “Life
Income Gift,” can actually increase your income. A
life income gift allows the donor to transfer assets
over to The Savory Center now, and yet continue
to receive the income from the cash, stock, or
other property contributed.
Friends of The Savory Center
Please complete and return this reply form in the enclosed business reply enve l o p e
■ Enclosed is a gift for The Savory Center (amount $__________ )
■ Please charge my gift (amount $__________ ) *■ My company has a matching gift plan
■ I have already provided for The Savory Center in my will.
■ Please send me additional information on planned giving
Name: __________________________________________
Address:__________________________________________
City: ____________________________________________
State/Province:_______________ Zip/Postal Code __________
Country__________________________________________
Phone/Fax:________________________________________
* Credit Card #:____________________ Exp. Date ________
For further information about these choices, please call or write
Lee Dueringer , Director of Development at 505/842-5252, 505/843-7900 (fax),
or [email protected] (email). We would be pleased to provide
you, your attorney, your accountant or your tax
advisor with additional information and
assistance in making sure your commitment
to The Savory Center’s mission is fulfilled.
Mail this form to:
The Savory Center
1010 Tijeras Ave. NW
Albuquerque, NM 87102
4 HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE #89
For many people Holistic Management
is synonymous with good planning.
You create a holistic goal and plan and
manage toward it. Part of the holistic goal is
the future resource base description. In the
case of farms and ranches, this describes, and
even shows, a map of the desired condition
and layout of the land. The future resource
base description helps you in your holistic
land planning and making sure the whole
under management moves in the desired
direction. It is an integral part of the ongoing
monitoring and planning.
Having a future resource base description
is a good first step, but if you want to create
that kind of landscape then you need to look
at all the tools available to you. And, if you
want to get the most out of exploring your
options creatively, it helps to include others
in the whole who will be influenced by your
decisions as well as talking to others about
how they’ve handled their estate plans. Such
exploration and ensuing discussions can be
challenging stuff, but the rewards have been
great for those who have forged ahead.
Unfortunately, even good land managers
can sometimes fall short when it comes to
dealing with the people stuff for the long-
term health of their land and their estate,
such as preparing a will or estate plan. But
remember, there is not much use having a
goal or future resource base description for
the whole if the legal owner doesn’t take
steps to ensure appropriate ownership of
that land after his/her death.
If you are managing holistically, you have
a head start on holistic estate planning, as
the family has written a holistic goal that
describes what everyone wants. The financial
and biological planning is taking you in that
direction. But if you have no will or estate
plan, you are heading for a crisis that can
affect your family for generations because
the government will be left in charge of
figuring out what to do with your estate.
Trust in Your Planning
Cal Brandley, a former solicitor for Alberta
Agriculture, counseled hundreds of farm
families on legal matters. One of the issues
he pushed hardest was the need for a will.
“Here’s a typical scenario,” he told me one
think that planning what to do about their
estate will somehow cause them to die.
Others don’t know how to divide their assets
among their children, so put off making a
will. Cal said such people would tell him
“they’ll figure out how to divide it after I’m
gone.” He said nothing could be further from
the truth. Many families have been torn apart
by disagreements over who should get what
because they are trying to figure these things
out while grieving the loss of a family
member (not the best time to have to make
any decision). Ironically, many families don’t
always have much say in what happens with
the estate anyway—the government decides
for them. When a person dies “intestate” (i.e.,
without a will), the government in most, if
not all, states and provinces, appoints a trustee
who oversees the allocation of assets. It is
expensive, and often very unsatisfying for
all family members. Cal used to say “You
wouldn’t invite your neighbors to divide up
your estate after you are gone, so why would
you let the government do it?”
Preparing for Change
Perhaps you have struggled for years to
pay off the ranch, and leave it to your family.
But you left no will, and had no estate plan.
There is a good chance the family will have
to sell the place in order to pay the estate
and/or capital gains taxes that suddenly
become due. That would be enough to make
you turn over in your grave, wouldn’t it?
And a will, plus a bit of estate planning,
could have prevented it.
It is never smart to die without a will,
even if all you have is a modest house in
town and a few furnishings. But a landowner
dying without an estate plan and a will is
an outright crime. Too much is at stake.
If you died tomorrow, (or later this
afternoon, or as soon as you finish reading
this sentence—any of these scenarios is
entirely possible), who would take over the
operation of your business? Do your spouse
or children have all the information they
need to deal with the legal and tax
obligations they will have to face? It can be
hard enough under normal circumstances,
but when they are grief-stricken, leaving
them with an accounting nightmare and
Where There’s a Will, There’s a Wa yby Noel McNaughton
time. “A son has been working with his father
on the home farm or ranch for a number of
years with the understanding that he will
inherit the ranch when the old man dies, but
they have nothing on paper.
“Eventually the son marries, and at some
point his wife asks him what they have if the
dad dies. The son tells her he will get the
farm, but she points out they have nothing
on paper, so legally they have nothing.
“The son talks to the dad, who says
‘What’s the matter, don’t you trust me?’ The
son assures the dad he trusts him, so the dad
says ‘Oh . . . you think I’m going to die?’ The
boy says ‘Oh no dad . . . you’ll never die,’ and
goes home and climbs the walls. He’s
trapped—he can’t get his dad to put their
agreement in writing, so he can’t provide
his family with any real security.”
The sad thing about such an arrangement
is that the lack of planning can result in a
lack of trust that can hurt relationships while
all parties are alive and has the potential for
even more damage when a parent dies.
Communication is critical, if challenging. For
holistic managers, the holistic goal can be an
easy entry point into estate planning. You can
use a yearly holistic goal check to begin
having those kinds of conversations that not
only can be the basis for an estate plan, but
can also engage other family members and
decision makers in the current management
of that whole.
A will is an absolute essential part of your
estate planning no matter how uncomfortable
the process might be. That’s why it is
essential to get people you trust to help you
with the legal document and with sorting out
the personal and family issues that may arise
as you create that legal document.
People get funny ideas about wills. Some
For holistic managers, the holistic goal can be
an easy entry point into estate planning.
HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE • MAY / JUNE 2003 5
no knowledge of the business dealings of the
ranch is nothing short of cruel.
Are one or more of your children
involved in the ranch? Do you have written,
legally-binding agreements with them? If not,
stop reading and do it right now. Yes, it is
that important.
If you don’t feel comfortable talking with
your family about who should get what
when you die, hire a facilitator. Many of the
Certified Educators listed in IN PRACTICE are
trained to facilitate planning meetings and
have a deep knowledge of the Holistic
Management® decision-making process.
A meeting facilitator can
be invaluable in helping
everyone feel heard, and
in coming to an amicable
agreement about how
the estate should be
handled. And don’t make
planning your will a big
secret. The best way to
know what your family
wants to see happen
with the ranch after you
are gone is to ask them.
Some people worry
about how to divide
their assets. They don’t
want to give the whole
farm or ranch to one
child, but they also don’t
want to bankrupt that child by making them
take a big loan to pay off his or her sibling’s
“share” of the ranch. Cal used to counsel
farm and ranch couples to treat their kids
equitably , rather than equally . If they had
three children, and had paid for university
educations for two of them, and maybe
helped them buy houses in town, he said it
was equitable in many instances for the child
that stayed behind to help run the ranch
to receive it in the will.
After everyone agrees on what they
would like to see happen after you die (and
remember, you still get the last word), get
your lawyer and accountant involved to
make sure everything happens as planned. It
may cost some money, but it’s an investment
that will pay handsomely in the long run.
E verybody Wins
Hard as it may be emotionally to part
with the farm or ranch, if none of your kids
wants it, you will be doing them a favor by
selling it to someone who does want it, well
before you are likely to die of old age. As Cal
feel if these conversations never happen.
Staying on Top
When Elizabeth and I got married, we had
five children between us (my three and her
two). We talked at some length about what
should happen with our estate should we
chance to die, and then we got a lawyer to
help us write a will. (Don’t write a will on
your own. It is too easy to make simple
mistakes that nullify it.) We have updated
the will three times in the past 13 years, as
our estate has changed. We will continue to
update it as needed.
We believe this is
important, and Cal
Brandley would agree. I
remember him telling me
about a couple who
wrote a will when their
oldest daughter was a
baby. They left everything
to her at that time. They
later had a son, who
worked with his father
for 20 years on the
understanding he would
own the farm when the
dad died. They had no
written agreement. When
the parents died, the
daughter got the farm, as
they had never updated
their will. Such a scenario demonstrates how
critical it is to do not only the initial planning,
but also the monitoring of your plans and
making adjustments to them.
While our holistic goal doesn’t usually
change much after the first couple of years,
the tools we use, our assets, our knowledge,
and our experience base is constantly evolving
and changing. Things don’t always turn out the
way we planned, but that doesn’t mean we
can’t correct course and keep moving toward
our holistic goal. With estate planning and an
up-to-date will that reflects your holistic goal,
you create a family trust (in the truest sense
of the word) that will serve your family in
your current day-to-day management as
well as the future generations.
Edmonton, Alberta-based Noel
McNaughton is a journalist, personal
coach, Holistic Management ® Certified
Educator and grass farming enthusiast.
He can be reached at 780/432-5492
or [email protected] or
www.ravenseyeconsulting.com.
Brandley used to say, it is way easier to
divide cash among several children than to
divide a ranch.
None of our children is interested in
running our farm, which is a combination of
grass and woodlot. We are waiting for a local
forestry company to offer a landowner’s
program for growing aspen. When they come
up with it, and if it is attractive enough
financially, we may plant all the pasture to
trees, and create a 100-year plan for the
farm, guiding future generations in the
management of the woodlot. This will be
done in consultation with our children. We
will not, however, try to “rule from the grave”
by putting any kind of conditions in our will
that prevents them from selling the farm if
they would rather not own it jointly.
We no longer live on our farm, but
perhaps you want to stay on the ranch after
you retire. A variety of arrangements will
allow you to do so. The simplest is to sell
everything but the home quarters, with an
agreement that it will go to the buyer when
you die. Or, sell it all and have a “life estate”
in it. Talk to your lawyer about other
possible arrangements.
The key to remember is that there are
infinite possibilities to create the results you
want for yourself, the land, and for future
generations. It takes time and the courage
to talk about things we’ve been conditioned
not to discuss. However, if the older
generation leads the way in setting up such
planning sessions and asking questions
of all those in the family who will be
influenced by such estate planning, it can
ease the stress that the younger generation
may be currently feeling and certainly will
When Noel (third from left in back) and wife Elizabeth (second from left in front)
combined families, they needed to revise their estate plan. Keeping such documents
current is an important part of any ongoing holistic estate planning. This picture
was taken at Elizabeth's daughter's wedding.
6 LAND & LIVESTOCK IN PRACTICE #89
Conscious management toward a triple bottom line, where
decisions are simultaneously evaluated in light of social,
financial, and ecological soundness toward a holistic goal, is
a concept unique to Holistic Management. This is the Land and
Livestock section, so most of what appears here is weighted toward
discussions of grass, soil, sunshine, rain, and grazing planning—all the
ecology stuff. However, as Allan Savory realized several decades ago,
an ecologically regenerating ranch is ultimately doomed to fail if
expenses exceed income, and family members and ranch staff are
pulling in opposite directions. In many, if not most, situations, the
people and money issues are actually the most daunting challenges.
Sorting out relationships, clarifying and articulating shared values,
developing disciplined financial habits, and climbing out of a draining
debt load are not only challenging pursuits—for many of us, they are
painfully dreaded pursuits. It’s just way more fun to build fence,
move cows, and watch the grass grow.
With that said, it’s encouraging, eye-opening, and inspiring to come
across a ranching family that is heads and tails above the norm in the
social and financial realms. I recently had the chance to visit such a
family on the Trigg Ranch, just north of Tucumcari, New Mexico.
Rick and Kristen Holmes (and daughters Caitlin and Hilary) are the
managers and part owners of the ranch. Both are currently enrolled in
the Savory Center’s Ranch and Rangeland Manager’s Training Program.
We met last summer when my wife, Daniela, and I hosted the first
session of their program at our ranch in western Colorado. I’ve been
trying to get down for a visit ever since, and finally worked it into
my winter schedule last February.
Ranch History
Kristen’s maiden name is Trigg, and her ancestors founded the
ranch in 1918. Her grandfather, Steve Trigg Sr., his father D.C., and
Steve’s brothers partnered on the vast XIT Ranch in the Texas
Panhandle in the early years of the 20th century. They were some
of the first cattlemen to introduce Black Angus cattle into the West,
upgrading the native Texas Longhorns into a more marketable brand
of beef. During World War I, they hit a good lick peddling their black-
hided cattle to the federal government, and when circumstances led to
the dissolution of their XIT lease, the brothers headed straight west to
the current location of the Trigg Ranch to start new lives. Originally
238,000 acres (96,300 hectares), the surviving lineage of Steve Sr. still
holds title to just under 50,000 (20,200 hectares). The ranch was carved
out of the famous (and enormous) Bell Ranch, which still lies to the
north and west, and a big chunk of it was part of the massive Pablo
Montoya Spanish Land Grant. Like lots of New Mexico, it’s an area
rich in tradition and colorful local history. The Triggs have taken the
time and made the effort to capture their own history on the ranch.
Numerous photo albums of the old days, and a memoir written by
Kristen’s Aunt Adaline, document scores of important events,
memorable stories, and daily ranch life through the years.
Kristen’s father, also named Steve, ran the ranch throughout most
of the past 60 years after the death of Steve Sr. He took over at a
young age and developed a rigid set of management policies that
didn’t bend much over the years. Kristen and her sister Sally (who
was also at the ranch at the time of my visit) remember their father
with tremendous affection and respect (he passed away in July 2002),
but they’re quick to point out that he was the boss and wasn’t overly
open to suggestions. Since the early 1970s, Rick has spent most of his
adult life working on the ranch, and he can’t recall Steve asking for
much advice either.
Family Bonds
While Steve may not have been much of a collaborator, he
evidently did something right to maintain family harmony. His sisters
Adaline and Louise were adamant about keeping the ranch intact and
under Steve’s management after their mother passed away in 1976.
They didn’t create a family war and fight for their share of the pie.
They loved the ranch and knew Steve deserved to continue to derive
his living from it. They valued generational continuity and a
connection to place.
Louise, Adaline, and Steve successfully passed these same values
LAND L I V E S TO C K& A Special Section ofIN PRACTICE
MAY/JUNE 2003 #89
The Holmes family—Hilary, Caitlin, Rick and Kristen. “It’s
encouraging, eye-opening, and inspiring to come across a ranching
family that is heads and tails abo ve the norm in the social and
financial realms.”
On the Trigg Ranch—
Tough Challenges,
Big Possibilitiesby Jim Howell
IN PRACTICE • MAY / JUNE 2003 LAND & LIVESTOCK 7
onto the current generation of Triggs in charge of the ranch. Prior to
Steve’s death, the family established a creative set of legal structures
(including a family limited partnership, a trust, and a corporation) to
prepare for the smooth passing of the ranch onto the next generation.
The fact that Steve and his family had the foresight to take these vital
actions says a lot about Steve’s character and leadership qualities.
Without going into any details, these legal structures have enabled the
ranch to maintain the extremely strong financial position that was
generated by Steve’s management over the years (more on that below).
Continuing with the theme of “family working together,” the Triggs
have established an annual tradition that they call “work week.” All of
Kristen and Sally’s generation (which includes two brothers, Eric and
another Steve, as well as several cousins), plus all of their children, get
together for a week in the summer and tackle a meaningful ranch
project. Several years ago, the family decided that comfortable, inspiring
accommodation was lacking when
they came for visits, so during work
week in recent years, they’ve been
remodeling/refurbishing one of the
original ranch houses where Kristen’s
grandparents lived. It’s a beautiful,
expansive stone house at the head
of a dramatic canyon, and no doubt
will receive lots of use as future
generations of Triggs continue to
work on and visit the ranch. The
whole family maintains a reverence
for their grandmother Bess, who was
Steve Sr.’s wife, and has wonderful
memories of spending time up at
“Nana’s house” in their youth, so
remodeling the house is also a means
of preserving a meaningful part of
family and ranch history.
Financial Frugality
So that’s a taste of the social/people side of the ranch. As with all
families, little nagging conflicts will always be present, but with their
common purpose and aligned values, the likelihood of molehills
turning into mountains seems slim. Moving into economics, the ranch
is in very sound financial health due largely to Steve’s extremely frugal
spending habits over the years. The ranch is totally debt free, with no
money owed on either land or cattle. A healthy cushion of operating
capital also eliminates any need for operating credit. On our trips
visiting ranches around the world, the most financially stable, and
often the most financially prosperous, are the operations that keep
things simple and focus on basic essentials. That’s definitely been the
Trigg philosophy for many decades.
Black Angus Longhorns and Bighorns
Steve wasn’t into anything fancy, including cattle. With the
exception of a brief experiment into Charolais bulls in the ‘70s (which,
according to Rick and Kristen, was totally out of character for Steve),
he never bought a fancy bull from a fantasy world seedstock producer.
He actually was reluctant to buy a bull period. At branding, Steve
would occasionally direct the man with the knife to “let that one go,”
and those lucky few bull calves grew into herd bulls. Rugged terrain
also lent to the establishment of a few groups of wild cattle. The continued on page 8
ranch’s convoluted, steep, rocky canyons and buttes led to the natural
selection of a strain of bovines more akin to wild bighorn sheep than
domestic cattle. Bull calves from these “wild bunches” also added to
the bull battery. No cattle are ever vaccinated (except for a couple of
initial shots at branding), and they’re never wormed or treated for
external parasites in any way. Bulls are never pulled, and the cows are
left to calve as nature sees fit, which in their part of New Mexico
means a calving bulge in the spring.
Historically, cows were kept in the herd for years, and were never
individually identified in any way. As long as she could hold her
condition and breed back, she had a home. The only significant
direct input into the cowherd is a little protein cake during the cold
months of mid-winter. About three years ago, they also started to
use an abundant and renewable resource to raise the winter plane
of nutrition—cholla cactus. They burn off the spines with a
propane burner and the cattle maul
the defenseless succulents (see
“A Renewable Winter Feed
Source,” page 8).
The result after all these years is
a herd of small framed, easy keeping,
incredibly tough, and very fertile
black cattle. When they’re fat in the
summer, they might weigh 900
pounds (409 kgs). My visit coincided
with the widespread drought
currently sweeping most of the West,
and grass was scarce at best across
the ranch. Considering their meager
rations, these little black cattle were
all in excellent condition. They had a
good shine for late winter, and the
few calves that had already hit the
ground were frisky and healthy. The
cows are feminine and the bulls are small but thick, and very easy
fleshing. They don’t look anything like the Black Angus cattle typical
of the breed today. And they aren’t. With the exception of their black
hides, they have a lot more in common with their Texas Longhorn
ancestors than their Angus contemporaries.
Historically, the ranch sent all the weaned calves to a nearby leased
ranch and marketed them as yearlings, or ownership was retained
through the feedlot. Incidentally, their adaptation to their wild, rocky
home didn’t diminish their performance in the feedlot. Feeders were
continually amazed at how efficiently these funny little cattle would
gain in the pen. They’ve since lost the leased ranch, so are now
marketing calves at weaning. They’ve been selling to ranchers who
lease winter wheat pasture to grow out yearlings through the winter
and spring.
The calves have developed a reputation for being so tough and
maintenance free that Rick and Kristen can’t meet the demand. Rick
says that, when it comes to settling on a price, “we don’t have to do
any haggling.” The ranch has historically run 1,000 cows (give or take),
and has averaged a weaned calf crop of about 800, with average
weights of about 400 pounds (181 kgs). That’s pretty good for an
extremely low input, survival-of-the-fittest management philosophy.
If success is measured by profitability and happy customers, it’s hard
to argue with their results.
Family work week at the Trigg Ranch.
8 LAND & LIVESTOCK IN PRACTICE #89
K eys to Ranching for Profit
Gregg Simonds, vice president of Ensign Ranches of Utah,
Wyoming, and Nebraska, emphasizes that profitability in ranching is
determined by three primary factors—cow fertility, cow longevity, and
low feed costs (which means not feeding hay), and that “everything
else is recreation.” Those are exactly the factors Steve Trigg emphasized
all those years. Allan Savory emphasizes a fourth factor, which he
places at the top of the profitability list—stocking rate. A ranch has to
efficiently utilize its forage resources, which means that stocking rate
has to be pushed as high as possible under well-planned grazing, while
also leaving the appropriate forage drought reserve. Unless a ranch is
using its grass (in a sustainable and regenerating manner), maximum
profit per acre—the only truly important economic measure—will never
be reached. Fertility and low feed costs mean nothing if they’re not
examined in light of profit per acre.
Also entering this equation is cow mature body size. A ranch that
is maximizing its stocking rate with large framed cows will always
carry less animal numbers than a ranch stocked with small cows. For
example, on the Trigg Ranch, we estimated the long-term historical
stocking rate at about 1,000 of these small-framed black cows. If they
wean 800 calves weighing 400 pounds (181 kgs), that’s 320,000 pounds
(145,455 kgs) of total production. If they had cows that could wean
500-pound (227-kg) calves at the same age, we figured the number of
cattle they could run might drop to 800 cows, since the cows would
have to be bigger, produce more milk, and therefore eat more grass.
Assuming the same 80 percent weaning rate, that’s 640 calves
weighing 500 pounds, which is also 320,000 pounds of total production.
But when you figure those 400-pound calves will always bring 5 to
10 cents more per pound than the 500-pound calves, those small cows
come out much more profitable. As a percentage of total body
weight, the big cows would probably need more protein and energy
supplementation to maintain acceptable body condition during the
winter as well. This is the reason the beef industry’s obsession with
weaning weights and per head production hasn’t resulted in more
profitability. Steve Trigg must have known that all along.
Having said all that, Rick and Kristen nonetheless have long
thought they needed to upgrade their cowherd with a little more
mainstream type of bull. They’re also concerned that after years and
years with no outside gene infusions, inbreeding might be starting to
become a problem. I would encourage them to stick with what they
have. The results speak for themselves. There is definitely room for
improvement with their selection and culling policy, but they’ve got a
set of cows that are supremely adapted to their country. If they really
think a few new genes might be necessary to slow down some
possible negative consequences from inbreeding, sourcing bulls from
similar country and from ranchers with stringent, straightforward
culling criteria is a must.
To reiterate, placing an inordinate degree of focus on complicated
selection criteria, fancy genetics, and traits other than fertility is almost
never profitable. Keep it simple, push stocking rate under sound
grazing planning, and let nature sort things out.
Back to the Land
That’s the good news. We’ve covered the social and financial
dimensions of this outfit—now for a little ecology. Like nearly every other
western ranch, the Trigg Ranch has been living on biological capital for
a long time. It’s been a slow and gradual decline. Steve probably wasn’t
conscious of it. Rick, Kristen, and the rest of their generation have been
aware of it for a long time, but Steve’s inflexible management style stifled
most serious attempts to address it. Now, with Rick and Kristen in the
driver’s seat, the whole family is excited about turning this trend around.
Eroding soil, mesquite and cedar proliferation, stunted grasses, bare
ground, and blue grama monocultures (a low-growing warm-season
perennial grass that is highly resistant to continuous grazing—or
overgrazing) are the norm across much of the ranch.
Rough Country Logistics
As they plan how to address this ecological decline, Rick and
Kristen are faced with several genuine challenges. One is the tough
nature of most of their country. On the drive down to the ranch
across northeastern New Mexico, easy rolling short grass prairie is
overwhelmingly dominant. This landscape persisted all the way to the
tiny town of Mosquero, just 17 miles (27 km) north of Trigg Ranch
headquarters. Rick and Kristen had told me they were in rough country.
Tough Challenges, Big Possibilities
continued from page 7
A Renewable Winter Feed Source
The Trigg Ranch uses cholla cactus as a winter protein/energy
supplement. It contains about 10 percent protein, and taking
into account the cost of the propane and the time it takes to burn,
provides the same amount of nutrients as commercial protein cake
for one-third the
cost. When
favorable moisture
conditions are
present, the cholla
grows right back
as well. Rick
Holmes is seen
here torching the
spines off a cholla.
A singed cholla
is a fantastic
attractant—without
sharp spines for
defense, the cattle
attack it like candy,
and create lots of
good impact.
The cattle leave
the cholla “trunks”
and create a well-
disturbed soil
surface.
IN PRACTICE • MAY / JUNE 2003 LAND & LIVESTOCK 9
Based on the view out my windshield, I just couldn’t believe it. I
began to think that maybe their definition of rough was different
from mine. Then all of sudden, everything changed dramatically.
Just south of Mosquero, the landscape quickly transformed into a
maze of cedar-studded canyons and cliffs. It’s not impossibly rough
(with the possible exception of a couple of paddocks where the
wild sheep-cows hang out), but it’s rough. Figuring out how to create
big herds of cattle, and then move them in a logistically feasible
manner, requires a serious commitment. In this sort of country, it
takes several years of trial and error before the best way to get from
“here to there” with several hundred (or several thousand) animals
becomes apparent. The chance of having demoralizing and energy-
sapping wrecks is high (100 percent in my experience). But I’ve
never seen a case where determination and “sticking with it” failed
to overcome logistical obstacles to sound grazing planning.
The important thing, I think, is to not expect to walk before you
crawl, not expect to run before you walk, and not expect to sprint
before you run. It will take a long time before things are really
humming, and that’s true even on flat country, let alone vertical
cliffs. You just have to be aware of it and not give up.
C ow Culture Considerations
It’s not just the logistics of moving cattle from one canyon or plateau
to the next that’s challenging; dealing with the entrenched habits of the
cattle is also tough. Animals that have lived their whole life in one
canyon or mesa understand how to make their living there. They know
where the grass is sweetest. They know which mesquite plants taste
good and which ones are too bitter to bother with. They know the
easiest route to water, the best places to give birth, the coolest spots
when the temperature climbs to 110 F, and the best hollows to take
cover in when the mercury plunges below zero. They know their place,
and have developed a culture to successfully survive within it. It’s really
no different than any other critter, including ourselves.
When we decide all our cows need to be in one herd, animals that
aren’t familiar with their new surroundings suddenly lose all the
advantages they had back in their old neighborhood. The combination
of all those tidbits of knowledge that result in survival (which
translates into calves to sell) suddenly no longer applies. They also
have to figure out how to get along with a bunch of new faces they’ve
seldom had to deal with previously. This all creates stress, not just on
the livestock, but on the people trying to implement the change. It can
also break the bank account and can lead to even worse ecological
conditions without careful planning, and continual monitoring,
controlling, and replanning.
The goal of the manager is to accomplish this transition from
sedentary, overgrazing, land degrading herbivores to moving, impacting,
resource-revitalizing herbivores with a minimum of overall stress. It
will be stressful, no matter what, but it should also be fun, motivating,
and satisfying.
So that’s what Rick and Kristen and I talked about for most of a
day—making the transition. Understandably, the complexity of their
challenge had left them unsure where to get started. Taking into
account the above realities of logistics and bovine culture, Rick and
Kristen got started by first identifying regions of the ranch that made
sense to manage as distinct units, or grazing cells, at least initially. They
looked at topography mostly, as well as water sources, trying to
imagine how a herd of cattle could get up and around and down and
through all these mesas and canyons, where they could get a drink,
The Trigg Ranch is a maze of cedar-studded canyons and cliffs. “Nana’s
House” is shown lower left.
what fences needed significant attention, etc.
In most cases, they could visualize making things work, but it took
some creative thinking. They also looked at how the cattle currently
are spread out around the ranch, and allocated these different bunches
to different grazing cells. We surmised that even though a cow will
tend to spend most of her life in a fairly small area, she certainly must
have ventured over the rim and down into the adjacent canyon at least
a few times. On the other hand, a cow that’s spent her whole life down
in the Creek Pasture probably never made the 15-mile (23-km) trek
north to Wild Horse Flat.
Combining existing small bunches of cattle within an area that they
already know (and with other cattle they most likely know), even if
they don’t know it intimately, is potentially a lot less stressful than
pushing them into totally novel surroundings already occupied by a
bunch of strangers. Just imagine how you’d like it.
Rick and Kristen ended up identifying three regions of the ranch
that they felt made sense to manage as distinct grazing cells. Each cell
ended up having five to six paddocks. We did a practice grazing plan
for the coming growing season for each cell, just so they could see
how it could all potentially come together. The prospect of a majority
of the ranch being free of grazing pressure for most of the growing
season was exciting. Time control, stock density, and herd size will still
be a long ways from the ideal, but they’ll be a whole lot more well-
managed than anytime in the past. They’re going to keep thinking
about it all, and between now and summer rains, refine this quick and
dirty plan to make it even more achievable. Once they’ve made this
first step and have a few seasons under their belts, have monitored
carefully, adapted accordingly, and are comfortable that things are
moving in the right direction, it will be time to test further refinement
of their fencing layout and grazing planning toward the ranch’s
holistic goal.
It was a pleasure to meet a ranching family with so many positive
things going for them. With people and financial issues well under
control, Rick and Kristen are well-poised to begin working on the
ecological side of things. With locally adapted cattle, the support of
the entire family, a healthy financial cushion, and a strong desire to
improve, the Trigg Ranch really is bursting with possibility.
To learn more about the Trigg Ranch and their projects,
visit www.triggranch.com.
Doc and Connie Hatfield
Brothers, Oregon:
Jim Howell’s article, “Springtime Begins in the Fall,” successfully tied
the general principles of holistic planned grazing with some very
pertinent specific realities of how cool season grass plants grow.
In a number of his other pieces, Jim also addresses the challenges
of laying litter on the ground in low production, brittle environments.
In our cold desert country, if you manage at a high stocking rate and
graze every pasture every year sometime between April and August
(which is our yearling cattle high gain period), very little litter will be
placed on the ground. All the forage is high quality at that time and
will be consumed, with the exception of a few areas of high animal
impact where the vegetation becomes soiled and trampled before it
can be grazed.
In our experience, our best litter-laying technique is supplementing
our cows in the winter with about five pounds (2.2 kgs) of dairy
quality alfalfa per day and feeding it on the snow and sagebrush. Over
26 years, this has changed our 8,000 acres (3,240 hectares) of winter
country to more of a grassland with less brush. However, we’re pretty
sure, after reading Jim’s article and thinking about it, that while the
government’s (Bureau of Land Management/BLM) long-term
monitoring shows a significant improvement in trend (more grass
plants, more litter, and less brush), we are probably limiting our total
grass production by grazing that country every year from October
through February and sometimes March. We are removing many of
those fall-initiated lead tillers during the fall, winter, and early spring,
thereby stunting productivity during the following growing season.
Our second successful litter laying is done in the spring (March
through mid-May), primarily with mouths, not hooves. That requires a
year’s worth of old grass and new green leaves a couple of inches tall
in the bottom of the plants. When the cows root around in the plant
to get to the green, most of the ranker stems from the previous
growing season spill onto the ground.
In light of the above observations, we would like to know Jim’s
10 LAND & LIVESTOCK IN PRACTICE #89
Doc and Connie Hatfield
Grazing Planning Practicalities
in the Dry, Cold Steppe
In Holistic Management , Allan Savory and Jody Butterfield state,
“Occasionally when testing a decision we disco ver a gap in our
knowledge that research could help to bridge. If such research exists,
we have to ensure that it is relevant to our own situation and
in line with what we hope to achieve in our holistic goal.” In
IN PRACTICE #87, I wrote an article titled “Springtime Begins in the
Fall,” summarizing several decades of research by Dr. Lee Manske
of North Dakota State University. It generated some good discussion
between myself, Doc and Connie Hatfield of Brothers, Oregon, and
Tony Malmberg from Lander, W yoming.
The following is an edited version of our exchanges, most of
which is centered on the practical aspects of applying Manske’s
findings to real life ranching situations on cold, dry brittle
rangelands. As you read through this article, bear in mind Allan
and Jody’s statement abo ve. Each of us has to evaluate these grazing
management specifics in light of our own “whole under
management” and our own holistic goal. I believe that Manske’s
work fills a significant gap in our understanding of nature’s
dynamics on rangelands dominated by cool season grasses. It’s up
to each of us to evaluate where that knowledge might fit in our
own operations. The same applies to the specific grazing planning
details discussed belo w. — Jim Howell
IN PRACTICE • MAY / JUNE 2003 LAND & LIVESTOCK 11
response to the following question: In the Great Basin cold desert,
could grazing every other year on a majority of pastures actually
produce more usable forage plus litter than an every year carefully
timed grazing? The opportunity for the extra boost in the current
season’s production from grazing lightly at the third leaf stage only
exists for a few weeks at most, and would be hard to apply to much
area with a year-round cow operation like ours. Also, even if it is more
effectively done with a seasonal yearling operation, the problem of
no litter still remains. So, might every other year grazing increase
both production and litter co ver?
Jim Howe l l
Montrose, Colorado
In regard to your first question, I think every other year grazing
can potentially produce more usable forage plus litter, but not
immediately . If a paddock is producing 10 animal days per acre every
year (on average) from a single grazing, I don’t think it will yield
20 ADA or more every other year until litter has had a chance to
accumulate, more plants have had the chance to establish, and
existing plants have developed greater vigor—in other words, until the
ecosystem processes have all improved significantly. That might take
quite a while. In my experience, nothing happens fast in these cold,
low-production brittle environments with short growing seasons.
On our place (with 14-inch precipitation, cool-season perennials,
and with most growth occurring in May and June), in the small plots
where we have given a two-year recovery period, i.e., every other year
grazing, the vigor of the plants in the second season is superior to
those that were grazed for just one 1-3-day grazing period the year
before. There is also lots more potential litter making material, but I
don’t think production is double. This coming summer will be the first
year that we will go back onto paddocks that have had a two-year
recovery period, so we’ll have a better idea next fall about how
production (ADA) is affected by giving this extended recovery period.
Our biological monitoring will also indicate if we’re moving in the
right direction in terms of reducing bare ground, increasing litter,
decreasing plant spacing, etc.
At this point, our long-term plan, following the Holistic
Management® Aide Memoire for Grazing Planning, is to graze a
paddock heavily one year, then not graze it at all the following year,
then graze it lightly to moderately for 3 years, then heavily again (after
those 4 years of light, moderate, or no grazing). This creates a bank of
ranker material in the first four years, much of which will get laid on
the ground during the fifth year of heavy grazing. We’d like to be able
to graze every other year, but to start out with that means we’d have
to halve our stocking rate, which we just can’t afford to do.
Under this alternate plan of treating our land paddock by paddock
and grazing four out of five years at different levels of intensity and
at different points in the growing season, and still following the Aide
Memoire, we’ll be able to maintain an economically viable stocking
rate and cash flow, while also allowing for the accumulation of older
material to provide litter.
Regarding the effect of winter grazing on production potential, I
always assumed that winter grazing had a benign, if not positive, affect
on any grass. But after learning about fall tiller development, I can
definitely see that severe winter grazing, especially if it’s repeated year
after year, could have definite negative consequences. So, as you noted,
being on your winter country every year from October to
February/March could be hindering your potential, since lots of those
fall tillers will be removed. Varying the severity and timing of grazing,
on a paddock-by-paddock basis from year to year, including an
occasional year of no winter harvest, are steps that may be taken to
address this. These actions can be easily planned in the context of
Holistic Management® grazing planning, and any action needs to
be taken in light of all the other factors affecting the whole ranch
(financial implications, animal performance considerations, etc.).
Tony Malmberg
L a n d e r, Wyo m i n g
Iread Jim’s article with great interest since I’d also read Dr. Manske’s
work several years ago. Based on Dr. Manske’s research, I went to
twice per season
grazing on our
ranch.
John Likins,
a Lander
BLM range
conservationist,
cautioned me
against using a
study conducted
in northern Great
Plains range
conditions to
modify the
management in
our more brittle,
less productive
sagebrush steppe.
It turns out that
John’s caution
was well-
founded. As we
implemented
“twice-over
grazing” at a high
stocking rate, the increased plant palatability exported all of our
potential litter-making material. I can’t say if this was exported in beef
or if less residual cover allowed litter to blow away. I think a major
part of the equation was that an increase in plant palatability (twice-
over grazing kept most plants in a vegetative, leafy condition) did not
allow for stemmy material to accumulate, break off, and become litter.
The supple, vegetative leaves were less prone to breakage by hoof
action, and our high stock densities and high stocking rates resulted
in very efficient (maybe too efficient) removal.
Our litter cover didn’t decrease, but it didn’t increase either, and
those initial years of grazing twice in the same season were good
precipitation years and should have resulted in increased ground cover.
What did decrease very significantly was production. I stopped seeing
expression of the high yielding bunchgrasses. They just shut down. In
1999, with a good moisture year, our yield fell from 10.3 ADA to 8.3,
Tony Malmberg surveying the sage grouse
population on his ranch.
continued on page 12
and the current drought, probably exacerbated by those years of
twice-over grazing, has brought us down to 4.2 ADA.
Now, taking into account Jim’s distinction between different types
of brittle environments, I would make the distinction between our
area and the Northern Plains as follows: our sagebrush steppe is highly
brittle/low production, while the northern plains might be semi- to
highly brittle/moderate production. In other words, the study site
was less brittle and higher producing than we are.
With this added awareness of a production axis added to the
brittleness scale, coupled with the fact, as reiterated by Allan Savory in
“Completing the Feedback Loop” (IN PRACTICE #87) that part of the
definition of recovery is a supply of litter, I would be very cautious
of grazing regrowth or secondary tillers in a low production brittle
environment. The increased production resulting from the early light
grazing will go much further as a supply of litter and increased plant
vigor for the following year. Once we get the soil surface covered with
a layer of mulch, we might predict a different grazing planning
strategy; i.e., with greater soil surface cover and more effective
ecosystem processes, production may eventually increase to the point
that two grazings in the same growing season are possible without
any adverse affects.
Most of us graziers managing low production brittle
environments haven’t yet seen a completely covered soil surface.
I have not seen less than 25 percent bare ground on our low
production, brittle environment ranch. If we get below that, we might
be amazed at where our monitoring and feedback loop will lead us.
Until we do, I’ll leave the second grazing to increase plant vigor and
provide a litter supply.
Jim Howe l l
Most western ranchers are running on huge expanses of low
production, topographically chaotic country with low paddock
numbers, scarce labor resources, and tight financial circumstances.
Because of these common constraints, planning a light early grazing,
followed by a second heavier grazing later in the year, is a challenging
feat to manage in most situations.
Finally, the decision to take any of this information into account
needs to be considered within the full context of the whole being
managed. For many reasons, twice-per-season grazing (or early light
grazing, or every other year grazing, or any other practice alluded to in
this article) may not pass testing toward the holistic goal of a particular
operation, even if it is logistically possible. If a particular practice does
pass, make sure it is still planned within the context of the Holistic
Management® Aide Memoire for Grazing Planning, and definitely
monitor under the assumption that you’re wrong, because (at least
initially) you probably will be.
12 LAND & LIVESTOCK IN PRACTICE #89
Grazing Planning Practicalities
in the Dry, Cold Steppe
continued from page 11
A Lesson Learned
The photo pictured here is a good example of the response an
early light grazing can have on cool-season plants. The photo
was taken on our ranch on August 6, 1999. It shows an ungrazed
plant (headed out on left of book) and a grazed
plant (on right with several vigorous secondary
tillers). The pasture was grazed at a light stocking
rate from June 1-7 that year, which would have
coincided with the post-third-leaf, pre-flowering
period. The elapsed recovery time, when the
photo was taken, would have been
approximately 60 days. Precipitation that year
was above normal, especially during the critical
month of April, which brought 6.44 inches (164
mm)—4.56 inches (116 mm) better than average!
The point is that this type of response is
possible with sufficient well-timed moisture. In
this specific example, the moisture pattern was
more typical of the Northern Great Plains than
the Wyoming sagebrush steppe, and the grass
responded exactly as Manske’s work predicts.
I used this pasture again from September 1-14
that year. Since then, the extended drought
has prevented this sort of grass growth from
occurring. If only I had left that regrowth in 1999. It was my last
chance before the drought to get litter cover, and I grazed it. Oh,
the cost of experience! —Tony Malmberg
HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE • MAY / JUNE 2003 13
It is with great anticipation and
excitement that I join The Savory Center
staff to further the work and vision of
Allan and the very capable team led by
Shannon Horst these last 11 years.
I decided to apply for this position last
December when my wife, Judelon, and I
were traveling in Spain and Morocco. After
viewing miles and miles of eroded
landscape that have been mismanaged by
human ignorance or exploitation for
centuries, all we could think about,
because of our exposure to Holistic
Management, was what needed to be done
to correct it, and we were stunned by the
magnitude of the task. I called Shannon
Horst right then to let her know that the
impact of this realization had been
significant enough to shift my
commitments from California to The
Savory Center and its work.
I am humbled by my selection as the
new Executive Director. The tasks are large
and the challenges many to help this
essential organization accomplish the
global reach it desires and the world needs.
Meet Our New Executive Director
As Chair of The Savory Center's Board of
Directors, it is my privilege and
pleasure to introduce our new Executive
Director.
However, I first wish to acknowledge the
grace and contributions that Shannon Horst
has given the organization and the movement
at large over her 12 years with The Savory
Center, 11 of which she served as our
Executive Director. Shannon has dedicated
her life and considerable talents to the growth
and well being of the organization and the
spread of Holistic Management globally. She
has led us to the current stage of stability and
phenomenal opportunity for all involved. In
the process, she created multiple jobs for
herself, several of which she will be taking
forward in the time ahead.
We are very lucky and pleased to have
Shannon’s continued leadership and energy
with us. Among her several on-going roles,
she will be directing the development of The
Savory Center's new international
headquarters at La Semilla in Albuquerque. It
is very gratifying that it was her choice to
initiate this transition and open the way to
bringing in additional leadership capacity for
the organization in this time of growth.
I am extremely grateful for the assistance
of the Search Committee members who
worked diligently to find an exceptional
candidate to recommend to the Board of
Directors. Leslie Christian and Richard Smith,
now both members of the Board of Directors,
Advisory Board Chair Robert Anderson,
Dianne “Sam” Law, who has just joined our
Advisory Board, and our co-founders Jody
Butterfield and Allan Savory all joined me in
this search process. After a concerted
outreach effort, we received close to 100
applications for the position. There were so
many excellent candidates, and they brought
such tremendous enthusiasm and passion to
their applications, that it made our task
exceptionally difficult. We sincerely hope that
many of the applicants will continue to be in
contact with us and develop other
opportunities together.
By the end of this process, after several in-
person interviews with the Search Committee
and Savory Center Staff and Board members,
as well as several other advisors and
Tim LaSalle has led the most dynamic
Agricultural Leadership Program in the U.S.
for the past 26 years. As President/CEO and
Educational Director of the California-based
Agriculture Education Foundation, he
developed what a colleague called “the gold
standard” of such programs in the U.S. and
overseas. In the course of his work he
traveled internationally every year with a
class of 30 agricultural leaders and has thus
developed a broad network of contacts and
colleagues around the world.
Tim grew up on his family’s farm in
California, received degrees in dairy science
and population genetics and is now
completing a Ph.D. in Depth Psychology. He
managed his own dairy farm for several years
until recruited by Cal Poly (San Luis Obispo,
California) at the age of 25 to teach in the
Dairy Science Department. He had become a
full professor in 1986 when the Agriculture
Education Foundation lured him away to
direct its California Agricultural Leadership
Program. During his tenure there, he grew
and refined the program to its current status
and exceptional educational offering.
Tim was referred to Holistic Management
several years ago and quickly took it upon
himself to connect with The Savory Center.
After a day of learning about it in
Albuquerque with Allan Savory and Shannon
Horst, he proceeded to incorporate Holistic
Management into his leadership program
curriculum. This has provided him the chance
to develop his knowledge and understanding
of Holistic Management and incorporate it
into his life.
Please join me in welcoming Tim and his
wife, Judelon, to Albuquerque, to The Savory
Center, and to our shared work in the world.
We look forward to creating as many
opportunities as possible for Tim to meet you,
our circle of friends. He will be attending the
HRM of Texas’s Rendezvous on September 26-
28 so we hope to see many of you there!
Tim’s e-mail address will be
[email protected] as of April 15th.
Again, I want to thank everyone who
assisted in this process, everyone who applied
for this position, and everyone who will help
us grow the organization and fulfill its
mission in the years ahead.
With appreciation,
Rio de la Vista,
Chair, Board of Directors
colleagues, we came to a unanimous choice.
Thankfully the person we chose also
chose us and will be joining us April 15th.
S a vory Center Bulletin Board
Tim LaSalle
continued on page 14
14 HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE #89
Board of Directors Expands
We’re pleased to announce that Richard
Stowers Smith, who has served on our
Advisory Board since
2001, has now joined
The Savory Center’s
Board of Directors.
Upon graduating from
Yale University, he
worked in a family
business and then
commenced a career in
investment banking,
starting with Lazard
Freres & Co. in New
York, and ending with Rotan Mosle, Inc., in
Houston. For the past 15 years he has been
President of Ventex Management, Inc., a private
equity investment firm in Houston. And for
the past 35 years has also managed the Stowers
Ranch, near Hunt, Texas, a cattle, hunting, and
nature tourism operation that has been in his
family since 1904.
He was first exposed to Allan Savory’s
thinking in 1980 and immediately recognized its
relevance and importance. Soon after, his family
and their ranch manager attended several
Holistic Management courses and incorporated
the new ideas on their own ranch. Richard’s
concern for the protection and restoration
of rangelands and his desire to reverse
desertification wherever it occurs, has made
him an active advocate of Holistic Management
ever since.
Richard has also served on the boards of
the Houston Ballet, the Contemporary Arts
Museum of Houston, and the Houston Child
Guidance Center, of which he was President,
and for many years has been actively
supportive of his wife Josephine’s involvement
in education and the environment. We feel
Bulletin Boardcontinued from page 13
Richard S. Smith
appointment to the Advisory Board he spoke
eloquently of its meaning to him: “In
illuminating the vital relationship of all life
forms, The Savory Center offers a promise to
the world and to the earth—that we might live
abundantly and peacefully upon this planet. It
honors me to support the work of the Center
toward the fulfillment of that promise.”
Dianne “Sam” Lathrop Law comes to the
Advisory Board following a 20-year career as a
corporate executive with Polaroid Corporation
where she was involved in worldwide corporate
communications, corporate education, leadership
development, and long-term strategic planning.
She holds Masters degrees in Organizational
Communications from Boston University and
Environmental
Leadership from Naropa
University. Sam became
familiar with Holistic
Management as an
environmental graduate
student and after
attending a course taught
by Allan Savory in 1998.
She looks forward to
bringing her experience
in organizational processes and communication
to the exciting task of growing the Center and
to the transitions this entails. Sam currently
makes her home in southern Colorado where
she and her sister are about to begin the
“green” renovation of Uptop, a ghost town they
own on 300 acres in the Sangre de Cristo
mountains which will one day be home to a
retreat where corporate leaders can meet, out
of the public eye, with the top minds in
environmental thinking and economics.
fortunate to now have the benefit of his
energy, insights and commitment on our
Board of Directors.
New Advisory Board Members
In March, the Savory Center added two
new members to its Advisory Board. Dr. Dean
Rudoy received his
education at The Johns
Hopkins University and
Fordham University and
the core of his training
in clinical psychology at
the New York
University-Bellevue
Medical Center. He has
served on the graduate
faculties of the New
York University School
of Medicine, the University of New Mexico, and
Webster University. He is past president of the
New Mexico Psychoanalytic Society, and
currently serves on the Board of Directors of
New Mexico Voices for Children.
For 26 years, Dean has worked as a
psychotherapist, teacher, consultant, and
researcher with a focus on children, adolescents,
and their families. He has also produced four
plays on adolescent life issues, and published
articles and books in the fields of psychology,
sociology, and political science. Over the years,
Dean has also served as a consultant to both
national and international political and research
organizations and several U.S. Senators.
Over the past year, Dean has assisted us
with the development of the La Semilla project,
which has benefited greatly from his many
skills and tireless advocacy. In accepting his
Correction
In the March/April #88 issue of IN
PRACTICE, we regrettably forgot to list two
trainees in our current Certified Educator
Training Program. Heather Amundson is the
Assistant Coordinator of the River Country
Resource Conservation and Development
Council in Wisconsin and Larry Dyer is a
research associate at Michigan State
University. Our apologies for the oversight.
Dean Rudo y
In Memoriam
Long time Advisory Board member Bunker Sands, died March 4 after
a year-long battle with pancreatic cancer. He was 54 and leaves
behind a daughter and two grown sons, and his wife, Gayle, who is
expecting twins in May.
Bunker was an Executive Director of the Dallas-based Rosewood
Corporation, which owns and manages a variety of hotel and ranch
properties. He first got acquainted with the Center in the mid 1980s
when he attended courses with the intention of managing the ranch
properties holistically. His successes in doing so have been recounted in
past issues of IN PRACTICE, most recently in April 1998 (#59).
Bunker had a keen interest in the development of wetlands, which
he worked tirelessly to create. Today his constructed wetlands cover over 2,000 acres on the
Texas working cattle ranches, providing essential nesting and wintering areas for migratory birds.
In honor of Bunker, The Savory Center will develop the Bunker Sands Wetlands Garden
adjacent to our new international headquarters (to be built in 2005) at the La Semilla Nature
Center in Albuquerque.
Sam Law
Bunker Sands
1948 - 2003
HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE • MAY / JUNE 2003 15
S a vory Circle ($5,000-100,000)
The Arntz Family Fund, San Rafael, CA
Sam Brown, Austin, TX
Harriett Dublin, Midland, TX
Bud & Mary Lou Flocchini, Reno, NV
The Flora Family Foundation Menlo Park, CA
Cynthia & Leo Harris, Albuquerque NM
M.A. Healy Family Foundation, Taos, NM
The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation,
Menlo Park, CA
The Hunter Fund, Cleveland, OH
J. Rukin Jelks, Jr., Elgin, AZ
Clint & Betty Josey, Dallas, TX
The Lumpkin Family Foundation, Mattoon, IL
Doug McDaniel & Gail Hammack, Lostine, OR
James & Carol Parker, Montrose, CO
Jane Reed, Cave Creek, AZ
Rosewood Corporation, Dallas, TX
Dean William Rudoy, Cedar Crest, NM
Bunker Sands, Dallas, TX
Allan Savory & Jody Butterfield,
Albuquerque, NM
The San Francisco Foundation,
San Francisco, CA
The Tides Foundation, San Francisco, CA
Patrons ($1,000-4,999)
Thomas Brown, Hershey, NE
Leslie Christian & Heather Anderson,
Seattle, WA
Bruce Condill, Arthur, IL
Nancy Dickenson, Santa Fe, NM
Lee & Jill Dueringer, Scottsdale, AZ
Paul Engler, Amarillo, TX
Stephen, Judy, Betty, & Jack Greenhalgh,
Salt Lake City, UT
Shannon & Taylor Horst, Albuquerque, NM
William Jenkins, Goodlands, KS
Craig & Jessica Leggett, Los Lunas, NM
Bonnie Lesser, Taylor, MO
Larry Madge, Sweet Grass, MT
Kim McDodge & Terence Dodge, Portland, OR
John & Sandra McDonald, Essex, England
New England Small Farm Institute,
Belchertown, MA
Kelly & Robert Pasztor, Albuquerque, NM
Progressive Investment Management, Seattle, WA
Richard & Josephine Smith, Houston, TX
John & Cynthia Sparks, Albuquerque, NM
C. Pat & Nancy Spurlock, Payson, AZ
Mike & Vicki Turpen, Albuquerque, NM
Andree Wagner Peace Trust, Arcata, CA
Herb West, San Anselmo, CA
Drausin Wulsin, Cincinnati, OH
Jake Flake, Snowflake, AZ
Brigitte Fleeman, Mountain View, CA
Mark Frasier, Woodrow, CO
Floss, Jerry & Tony Garner, Brownlee, NE
John F. Gerber, Amherst, MA
John C. Glenn, Pensacola, FL
Robert Gloy, Grant, NE
Donald A. Gonzales, Santa Fe, NM
Goodrich Ranch Co., Lampasas, TX
Bob Gray, Newbury, VT
Arlin Grimes, Driggs, ID
John & Charlotte Hackley, Jacksboro, TX
Caroline J. Hadley, Carson City, NV
Louis I. Hagener, Havre, MT
John M. Hall, Nice, France
Robert D. Henry, Newburg, ND
Susan Scott Heyneman Foundation, Fishtail, MT
Rodney & Carol Hickle, Center, ND
Duane Hilborn, Albuquerque, NM
Jerry Holtman, Taber, AB, Canada
Robert L. Homer, Albuquerque, NM
Gerda & Dayton Hyde, Chiloquin, OR
Taylor & Becky Hyde, Chiloquin, OR
William P. Jones, Harlowton, MT
Roxanne Jordan, Forestville, CA
Miles Keogh, Buffalo, WY
Dale Lasater, Colorado Springs, CO
Laurence Lasater, San Angelo, TX
Dianne Law, Laveta, CO
Joy Law, Hollister, CA
Ellen and Stan Lee, Bloomington, IN
John & Jane Leeser, Taylor, MO
Brad Little, Emmett, ID
Jo Luck, Little Rock, AR
Bill & Debbie Mackay, Custer, MT
Sue Lani & Craig Madsen, Edwall, WA
Kate McBride, Aspen, CO
Patrick McCarty, Parachute, CO
Donna & William McCormack, Prineville, OR
Joseph P McElligott, Ione, OR
Mike & Catherine H. McNeil, Monte Vista, CO
Douglas McRae, Forsyth, MT
Arnold G. Mendenhall, Hickman, NE
Joe Middleton, North Fork, CA
Bill Milton, Roundup, MT
Anne and Rich Morris, San Juan Bautista, CA
Robert Nelville, Purdys, NY
The Tom Norton Family, Madras, OR
Pulakos & Alongi, Ltd., Albuquerque, NM
John W. Ravenscroft, Nenzel, NE
Margaret Phelan Reed, Beaumont, TX
James F. & Colleen Reeves, Wimberly, TX
Frank & Katherine Russell,
Lethbridge, AB, Canada
B e n e factors ($500-999)
Ken Alston, Earlysville, VA
Robert & Shelley Bernick, Salt Lake City, UT
Don & Bev Campbell, Meadowlake, SK, Canada
Edith Cather, Parkersburg, WV
Ron Chapman, Albuquerque, NM
Mary Child, Sugar Grove, WV
Rio De La Vista, Monte Vista, CO
John & Leslie Flocchini, Gillette, WY
Don & Randee Halladay,
Rocky Mt House, AB, Canada
Blake Holtman, Taber, AB, Canada
Christine Jurzykowski , Glen Rose, TX
Joe & Peggy Maddox, Ozona, TX
James A. McMullan, San Antonio, TX
Gary Rodgers, Highlands Ranch, CO
York Schueller, El Segundo, CA
HR Stasney, Houston, TX
Jack and Teresa Southworth, Seneca, OR
Bill Thompson, Denver, CO
Liz Williams, Austin, TX
George & Elaine Work, San Miguel, CA
Don Youngbauer, Forsyth, MT
Friends ($100-499)
Ann Adams & Ellen Ashbrook, Tajique, NM
Eve Adams & Betsy Cahill, Las Cruces, NM
Mary & Dan Adams, Payson, AZ
Michael & Susan Ahlers, Hartley, IA
Dieter Ali Albrecht, Beijing, China
Christina Allday-Bondy, Austin, TX
Steve & Rachel Allen, Crawford, CO
Donna Attewell, Mill Valley, CA
John Ball, Jr., Germantown, MD
Monte Bell, Orland, CA
Mike Benziger, Glen Ellen, CA
Jody Birks, San Miguel, CA
Duncan K. Blair, Patagonia, AZ
Eric Brown, Hershey, NE
Tamsin & Bruce Boardman, Bluff Dale, TX
Don Bouma, Jr., Carpenter, WY
Andy & Geni Braman, Albuquerque, NM
Bill Burrows, Red Bluff, CA
Manuel Casas, Huixquilucan, Mexico
Celtic Jewelry, Santa Fe, NM
Nate & Angela Chisholm, Madison, WI
Combined Federal Campaign, Baton Rouge, LA
Peter Day, Kilauea, HI
Dick DeVore, Wichita, KS
Michael D’Mura, Peoria, AZ
Byron and Wayne Eatinger, Thedford, NE
Aspen & David Edge, Granada, Spain
Kathryn Ehrhorn, Benson, AZ
Ella Erway, Hanover, NH
John Fairbairn, Arkville, NY
The Savory Center Supporters
continued on page 16
We’d like to offer our deep appreciation to those who made financial
contributions to the Savory Center in the last year. Your contributions
enabled us to expand our community-based conservation ef forts in
Africa and in the U.S. and better support our practitioners and
educators around the world with new and impro ved educational
programs, materials, and research. Together we can make a dif ference!
16 HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE #89
Tom White, Lakin, KS
Don Whitten, Colorado Springs, CO
Dennis & Brenda Wohlgemuth,
Crooked Creek, AB, Canada
Peter Young, Plainfield, VT
Friends ($1-49)
Victor Abdul-Nur, Pueblo, CO
Ivan & Martha Aguirre, Hermosillo, Mexico
Dave Baker, Isanti, MN
Cindy Bohna, Hornitos, CA
Denise Bostdorff and Dan O’Rourke,
Wooster, OH
Scott Butterfield, Santa Barbara, CA
Mary Cannon, Mt. Prospect, IL
Patricia Cavicchioni, Saratoga, WY
Kirkwood M. Cunningham, Boulder, CO
Allen Darrow, Albuquerque, NM
Michael Diem, Cascade, ID
Peter Donovan, Enterprise, OR
Rita Donham-Burgess, Cora, WY
Ken Gallard, Taos Ski Valley, NM
Mark Gordon, Buffalo, WY
Berkeley Harris, Diamond Bar, CA
Margaret Holske, Cortez, CO
Jay Holzmiller, Anatone, WA
Paul Kane, Sterling, IL
Jim & Sue Keating, Bennington, KS
Lawrence Levine, Sunnyvale, CA
Priscilla Marden, Jackson, WY
James Matthews, Buena Vista, CO
James E. McCollum, Great Falls, MT
Kirk Mills, Arvada, CO
Ralph B. Montee, Cullowhee, NC
Jeff Moser, Denver, CO
Alice Moore, Raton, NM
Paul Nehring, Wausau, WI
Michael T. Nepereny, Stratford, IA
Charlotte Rhodes, Dripping Springs, TX
Rosebud Conservation District, Forsyth, MT
Walt Ruzzo, Mountainview, CA
Preston Sullivan, Fayetteville, AR
David Tepper, Deerfield, IL
Ken Tager, Albuquerque, NM
Jan Wright, Bonanza, OR
Greg Young, Bolivar, MO
Pat Rutledge, Monitor, AB, Canada
Charles F. & Jennifer Sands, Phoenix, AZ
Mary Ann Sharon, Dillon, MT
Jim and Sara Shelton, Vinita, OK
Bob Siemens, Fiske, SK, Canada
Brian Sindelar, Belgrade, MT
Kirvil Skinnarland, Seattle, WA
Johanna Smith, Wimberley, TX
Anne Stilson-Cope, Elizabeth, CO
Milton B. Suthers, Arvada, CO
Livingston K. Toomer, Gypsum, CO
Pono and Angela Von Holt, Kamuela , HI
Dennis & Jean Wobeser,
Lloydminster, AB, Canada
Perry & Bette Wilkes, Albuquerque, NM
Jack & Zera Varian, Parkfield, CA
Demetrio Vazquez, Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Members ($50-99)
Don Adams, Folsom, NM
Kathie Arnold, Truxton, NY
Kim & Erich Barmann, Springer, NM
Xavier Basurto, Tucson, AZ
Terry Beck, La Farge, WI
Craig A. Beckner, Newcastle, WY
Thomas Bedell, Philomath, OR
Ben Berlinger, La Junta, CO
William Blaiklock, Arrowsic, ME
Thomas D. Bonomo, Cottonwood, AZ
Donald & Janice Braman, Jr, Albuquerque, NM
Barton A. Brown, Coarsegold, CA
Dick Byrd, Vaughn, NM
Powhatan Carter III, Fort Sumner, NM
Eddie and Betty Sue Conway, Payson, AZ
Mr. & Mrs. David R. Corrigan, Dallas, TX
Colleen Daniel, Walla Walla, WA
Dennis Demmel, Ogallala, NE
Virginia Dierker, West Falmouth, MA
Victoria Dietz, Worland, WY
Douglas T. Dockter, Farmington, NM
Bill C. Dorrance, Hollister, CA
Amy Driggs, Albuquerque, NM
James F. Dudley, Albuquerque, NM
John & Joyce Engels, North Bend, OR
Harold & Wanda Euwer, Leander, TX
Michael Evans, Saratoga, WY
Sally Fallon, Washington, DC
Kathryn & Lloyd Ferge, Echo, OR
Steven T. Fettig, Wishek, ND
John Fichtner, Elizabeth, WV
Blair Fitzsimons, Carrizo Springs, TX
Cornelia Flora, Ames, IA
Lowell & Mary Forman, Antelope, OR
Chris E. Frasier, Limon, CO
Sally Gamauf, Copley, OH
Leonard Garrison, San Rafael, CA
John S. Gay, Sahuarita, AZ
Joe Glode, Saratoga, WY
Mary Ellen Gonzales, Santa Fe, NM
Hawk & Shelley Greenway, Aspen, CO
Kevin Gruntmeir, Kingfisher, OK
Steve Hailstone, Adelaide, Australia
Jack Ham, Post, TX
Elizabeth Haverfield, Winona, KS
Gerald S. Henrikson, Madras, OR
Allen Hewko, Neilburg, SK, Canada
Jeff and Denise Hunewill, Wellington, NV
Joann M. Hutton, Glenwood, WA
Larry Johnson, Winona, MN
Edward Keith, Coffeyville, KS
Margaret Kinnett, Maybell, CO
John King, Richmond, New Zealand
Neal Kinsey, Charleston, MO
Paul Krebs, Bowling Green, OH
Roland Kroos, Bozeman, MT
Jim & Barbara Long, Roseburg, OR
Norman & Gail Lowe, Flagstaff, AZ
Richard Luciano, Morristown, NJ
Sheila R.V. Luoma, Arcadia, NE
Sandra M Matheson, Bellingham, WA
Gary Markegard, Eureka, CA
Tom McAllister, Lincoln, NE
Earl & Sharon McKinney, Prineville, OR
William Kenneth Medlin, Moscow, ID
Nathan Melson, Dodd City, TX
John L. Merrill, Crowley, TX
Eudoro Moreno Moreno, Aguascalientes, Mexico
Deb Morley, Cambridge, MA
Jim & Shari Morrison, Pampa, TX
Cynthia Noble, Graeagle, CA
Wallace Olson , Vinita, OK
Charles Orchard, Bozeman MT
Michael Orr, Eureka, CA
Joyce Osborne, Salt Lake City, UT
Kelli & Bill Parker, Calhan, CO
John Phelan, Mountain Park, OK
Allen & Tauna Powell, Laclede, MO
Mark & Wendy Pratt, Blackfoot, ID
Dina & Bill Quigley, Clearlake Oaks, CA
Jim & Liz Rehfeld, Holly, CO
Dick & Judy Richardson, Vryburg, South Africa
Tom Rietmann & Katie Cook, Condon, OR
Merlyn Rix, Wetaskiwin, AB, Canada
Dale Robinson, Paragonah, UT
Richard Rominger, Winter, CA
Marcus Rogers, Newport, RI
Kathleen Sayce, Nahcotta, WA
Charles D. Schmidt, Fredericksburg, TX
Dr. & Mrs. Robert Scholes, Rodeo, NM
David Scott, Cochrane, AB, Canada
Homer A. & Mildred S. Scott Foundation,
Sheridan, WY
Ridge Shinn, Hardwick, MA
Joe & Michele Simmons, Newcastle, WY
Bob Steffen, Bennington, NE
Pete Tatschl, Tucumcari, NM
Federico Urioste, Argentina
Arne Vanderburg, Cedar Crest, NM
Arne van Garrel, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
W. Doug Warnock, Ellensburg, WA
James D. Weaver, Causey, NM
Bryan Wehrli, Cedar Crest, NM
Volunteer Thanks
This issue we’d like to thank Ken Roberts,
Tina Pilione, and Wilma Keppel for their
efforts in producing and promoting two well-
attended workshops in California in
connection with Allan Savory’s keynote
speech at the American Farmland Trust
national conference in March. Thanks also to
Nancy Butler of the Rio Grande Headwaters
Trust and Vivianne Holmes for helping us get
our information and materials to a wider
audience. Your contributions are invaluable.
Savory Center Supporters
continued from page 15
HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE • MAY / JUNE 2003 17
ARIZONA
Kitty Boice
P.O. Box 745, Sonoita, AZ 85637
520/907-5574
ARKANSAS
Preston Sullivan
P.O. Box 4483
Fayetteville, AR 72702
479/443-0609; 479/442-9824 (w)
CALIFORNIA
Monte Bell
325 Meadowood Dr., Orland, CA 95963
530/865-3246; [email protected]
Julie Bohannon
652 Milo Terrace, Los Angeles, CA 90042
323/257-1915
Jeff Goebel
P.O. Box 1252, Willows, CA 95988
530/321-9855; 530/934-4601 x101 (w)
Richard King
1675 Adobe Rd.
Petaluma, CA 94954
707/769-1490; 707/794-8692 (w)
Christopher Peck
P.O. Box 2286, Sebastopol, CA 95472
707/758-0171
COLORADO
Cindy Dvergsten
17702 County Rd. 23, Dolores, CO 81323
970/882-4222; [email protected]
Rio de la Vista
P.O. Box 777, Monte Vista, CO 81144
719/852-2211; [email protected]
Daniela Howell
63066 Jordan Ct.
Montrose, CO 81401
970/249-0353
Tim McGaffic
P.O. Box 476
Ignacio, CO 81137
970/946-9957; [email protected]
❖ Cliff Montagne
Montana State University Department of Land
Resources & Environmental Science
Bozeman, MT 59717
406/994-5079; [email protected]
NEW MEXICO
❖ Ann Adams
The Savory Center
1010 Tijeras NW
Albuquerque, NM 87102
505/842-5252
Amy Driggs
1131 Los Tomases NW
Albuquerque, NM 87102
505/242-2787
Kirk Gadzia
P.O. Box 1100, Bernalillo, NM 87004
505/867-4685; fax: 505/867-0262
Ken Jacobson
12101 Menaul Blvd. NE, Ste AAlbuquerque, NM 87112505/[email protected]
❖ Kelly Pasztor
The Savory Center
1010 Tijeras NW,
Albuquerque, NM 87102
505/842-5252
Sue Probart
P.O. Box 81827
Albuquerque, NM 87198
505/265-4554
Vicki Turpen
03 El Nido Amado SW
Albuquerque, NM 87121
505/873-0473; [email protected]
Arne Vanderburg
P.O. Box 904, Cedar Crest, NM 87008
505/286-6133
NORTH CAROLINA
Sam Bingham
394 Vanderbilt Rd.A s h eville, NC 28803828/274-1309; [email protected]
NORTH DAKOTA
❖ Wayne Berry
University of North Dakota—Williston
P.O. Box 1326
Williston, ND 58802
701/774-4269 or 701/774-4200
OHIO
❖ Deborah Stinner
Department of Entomology OARDC
1680 Madison Hill
Wooster, OH 44691
330/202-3534 (w); [email protected]
Chadwick McKellar
16775 Southwood Dr.
Colorado Springs, CO 80908
719/495-4641; [email protected]
Chandler McLay
P.O. Box 262, Dolores, CO 81323
970/882-8802
Byron Shelton
33900 Surrey Lane
Buena Vista, CO 81211
719/395-8157
GEORGIA
Constance Neely
1160 Twelve Oaks Circle
Watkinsville, GA 30677
706/310-0678; [email protected]
IOWA
Bill Casey
1800 Grand Ave.
Keokuk, IA 52632-2944
319/524-5098; [email protected]
LOUISIANA
Tina Pilione
P.O. 923, Eunice, LA 70535
phone/fax: 337/580-0068
MINNESOTA
Terri Goodfellow-Heyer
4660 Cottonwood Lane N
Plymouth, MN 55442
612/559-0099; [email protected]
Larry Johnson
RR 1, Box 93A
Winona, MN 55987-9738
507/457-9511; 507/523-2171 (w)
MONTANA
Wayne Burleson
RT 1, Box 2780, Absarokee, MT 59001
406/328-6808;
Roland Kroos
492 Itana Circle
Bozeman, MT 59715
406/522-3862; [email protected]
Certified Educators
UNITED STATES
❖ These Educators provide Holistic Management instruction on behalf of the institutions they represent.
To our knowledge, Certified Educators are the best qualified individuals to help others learn to
practice Holistic Management and to provide them with technical assistance when necessary. On a yearly
basis, Certified Educators renew their agreement to be affiliated with the Center. This agreement requires
their commitment to practice Holistic Management in their own lives, to seek out opportunities for
staying current with the latest developments in Holistic Management and to maintain a high standard of
ethical conduct in their work.
For more information about or application forms for the U.S., Africa, or International Certified Educator
Training Programs, contact Kelly Pasztor at the Savory Center or visit our website at
www.holisticmanagement.org/wwo_certed.cfm?
18 HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE #89
OKLAHOMAKim Barker
RT 2, Box 67, Waynoka, OK 73860580/824-9011; [email protected]
OREGONJoel Benson
613 Fordyce St., Ashland, OR 97520541/488-9630; [email protected]
Cindy Douglas
2795 McMillian St., Eugene, OR 97405541/465-4882; [email protected]
TEXAS
Christina Allday-Bondy
2703 Grennock Dr., Austin, TX 78745512/441-2019 ; [email protected]
Guy Glosson
6717 Hwy 380, Snyder, TX 79549806/237-2554; [email protected]
❖ R.H. (Dick) Richardson
University of Texas at Austin Department of Integrative BiologyAustin, TX 78712512/471-4128; [email protected]
Doug Warnock
151 Cedar Cove Rd.
Ellensburg, WA 98926
509/925-9127
warnockd@ elltel.net
WISCONSIN
Elizabeth Bird
Room 203 Hiram Smith Hall
1545 Obseratory Dr
Madison WI 53706
6 0 8 / 2 6 5 - 3 7 2 7
e a b i r d @ fa c s t a ff . w i s c . e d u
WYOMING
Miles Keogh
450 N. Adams Ave.
B u ffalo WY 82834
307/684-0532; [email protected]
Tim Morrison
P.O. Box 536
Meeteese, WY 82433
307/868-2354; mcd@tctwe s t . n e t
Peggy Sechrist
25 Thunderbird Rd.Fredericksburg, TX 78624830/990-2529; [email protected]
WASHINGTON
Craig Madsen
P.O. Box 107, Edwall, WA 99008
509/236-2451; [email protected]
Sandra Matheson
228 E. Smith Rd., Bellingham, WA 98226
360/398-7866; [email protected]
❖ Don Nelson
Washington State University P.O. Box 646310, Pullman, WA 99164509/335-2922; [email protected]
Maurice Robinette
S. 16102 Wolfe Rd., Cheney, WA 99004
509/299-4942; [email protected]
Lois Trevino
P.O. Box 615, Nespelem, WA 99155
509/634-4410; 509/634-2430 (w)
I N T E R N AT I O N A L
AUSTRALIA
Helen Carrell
“Hillside” 25 Weewondilla Rd.Glennie Heights, Warwick, QLD 437061-4-1878-5285; 61-7-4661-7383 helenc@upfrontoutback,com
Steve Hailstone
5 Lampert Rd., Crafers, SA [email protected]
Graeme Hand
“Inverary”Caroona Lane; Branxholme, VIC 330261-3-5578-6272; [email protected]
Mark Gardner
P.O. Box 1395, Dubbo, NSW [email protected]
Brian Marshall
“Lucella”; Nundle, NSW 2340
61-2-6769 8226; fax: 61-2-6769 8223
Bruce Ward
P.O. Box 103, Milsons Pt., NSW 156561-2-9929-5568; fax: [email protected]
Brian Wehlburg
c/o “Sunnyholt”, Injue, QLD [email protected]
CANADA
Don and Randee Halladay
Box 2, Site 2, RR 1; Rocky Mountain House, AB T0M 1T0; 403/[email protected]
Noel McNaughton
5704-144 St., Edmondton, AB, T6H 4H4780/432-5492; [email protected]
Len Pigott
Box 222, Dysart, SK SOH 1HO 306/[email protected]
Kelly Sidoryk
Box 374, Lloydminster, AB, S9V 0Y4403/[email protected]
CHINA/GERMANY
Dieter Albrecht
2, Yuan Ming Yuan Xi LuBeijing 1009486-10-6289 [email protected] (international)
MEXICO
Ivan Aguirre
La InmaculadaApdo. Postal 304Hermosillo, Sonora 83000tel/fax: [email protected]
Elco Blanco-Madrid
Cristobal de Olid #307 Chihuahua Chih., 3124052-614-415-3497; fax: [email protected]
Manuel Casas-Perez
Calle Amarguva No. 61, Lomas HerraduraHuixquilucan, Mexico City CP 5278552-558-291-3934; 52-588-992-0220 (w)[email protected]
Jose Ramon “Moncho” Villar
Av. Las Americas #1178Fracc. CumbresSaltillo, Coahuila [email protected]
NAMIBIA
Gero Diekmann
P.O. Box 363, Okahandja [email protected]
Wiebke Volkmann
P.O. Box 182, Otavi, 067-23-44-48;[email protected]
NEW ZEALAND
John King
P.O. Box 3440, Richmond, [email protected]
SOUTH AFRICA
Johan Blom
P.O. Box 568, Graaf-Reinet [email protected]
Ian Mitchell-Innes
P.O. Box 52, Elandslaagte [email protected]
Norman Neave
Box 141, Mtubatuba [email protected]
Dick Richardson
P.O. Box 1806, Vryburg 8600tel/fax: 27-53-927-4367 [email protected]
ZIMBABWE
Mutizwa Mukute
PELUM Association Regional DeskP.O. Box MP 1059, Mount Pleasant, Harare263-4-74470/744117fax: [email protected]
Liberty Mabhena
Spring CabinetP.O. Box 853, Harare263-4-210021/2; 263-4-210577/8fax: 263-4-210273
Sister Maria Chiedza Mutasa
Bandolfi ConventP.O. Box 900, Masvingo263-39-7699, 263-39-7530
Elias Ncube
P. Bag 5950, Victoria [email protected]
HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT IN PRACTICE • MAY / JUNE 2003 19
CALIFORNIA
Holistic Management of California
Tom Walther, newsletter editor
5550 Griffin St.
Oakland, CA 94605
510/530-6410
tagjag@ aol.com
COLORADO
Colorado Branch of the Center
For Holistic Management
Jim and Daniela Howell
newletter editors
1661 Sonoma Court,
Montrose, CO 81401
970/249-0353
GEORGIA
Constance Neely
1160 Twelve Oaks Circle
Watkinsville, GA 30677
706/310-0678
IDAHO
National Learning Site
Linda Hestag
3743 King Mountain Rd.
Darlington, ID 83255
208/588-2693; [email protected]
Local Netwo r k s There are several branch organizations or groupsaffiliated with the Center in the U.S. and abroad (some publish their ownnewsletters.) We encourage you to contact the group closest to you:
PENNSYLVANIA
Northern Penn Network
Jim Weaver, contact person
RD #6, Box 205
Wellsboro, PA 16901
717/724-7788
TEXAS
HRM of Texas
Peggy Jones, newsletter editor
101 Hill View Trail
Dripping Springs, TX 78620
512/858-4251
AUSTRALIA
Holistic Decision Making Association
(AUST+NZ)
Irene Dasey, Executive Officer
P.O. Box 543
Inverell NSW, 2360
tel: 61-2-6721-0123
CANADA
Canadian Holistic Management
Lee Pengilly
Box 216, Stirling, AB, T0K 2E0
403/327-9262
MEXICO
Fundación para Fomentar
el Manejo Holístico, A.C.
Jose Ramon Villar, President
Ave. Las Americas #1178
United States
International
MONTANA
Beartooth Management Club
Wayne Burleson
RT 1, Box 2780, Absarokee, MT 59001
NEW YORK
Regional Farm & Food ProjectTracy Frisch, contact person148 Central Ave., 2nd floorAlbany, NY 12206518/427-6537
USDA/NRCS - Central NY RC&D
Phil Metzger, contact person
99 North Broad St., Norwich, NY 13815
607/334-3231, ext. 4
NORTHWEST
Managing WholesPeter Donovan
501 South St., Enterprise, OR 97828-1345
541/426-2145
www.managingwholes.com
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma Land Stewardship AllianceCharles GriffithsRoute 5, Box E44, Ardmore, OK 73401580/223-7471; [email protected]
Fracc. Cumbres Saltillo, Coahuila 25270
tel/fax: 52-844-415-1542
NAMIBIA
Namibia Centre for
Holistic Management
Anja Denker, contact person
P.O. Box 23600
Windhoek 9000
tel/fax: 264-61-230-515
SOUTH AFRICA
Community Dynamics
Judy Richardson
P.O. Box 1806
Vryburg 8600
tel/fax: 27-53-9274367
Come Visit Us!
We Offe r:
• Guided Bush Wa l ks
• H o rs e b a ck To u rs
• G a m e -Vi ewing Dri ve s
• A n t i - Po a ching Pa t rol Experi e n c e
• And much more !
In an unfo rget table setting with
comfy lodging, memorable meals
AT DIMBANGOMBE
Come Visit Us!AT DIMBANGOMBE
P ri va te Bag 5950 Ro ger Pa rry
Vi c to ria Fa l l s Email: ro g p a ch m @ a f ri c a o n l i n e . c o . z w
Z i m b a bwe Tel. (263)(11 ) 213 529
w w w. a f ri c a n s o j o u rn . c o m
Board of Trustees
Allan Savory, Chair
Ignatius Ncube, Vice Chair
Chief D. Shana II
Chief A. J. Mvutu
Chief B.W. Wange
Chief D. Nelukoba
Chief S.R. Nekatambe
Councilor Ndubiwa
Mary Ncube
Lot Ndlovu
Emeldah Nkomo
(Staff Representative)
Elias Ncube
(Staff Representative)
Osmond Mugweni - Masvingo
Hendrik O’Neill - Harare
Sam Brown, Austin, Texas,
ex-officio
Staff
Huggins Matanga, Director
Elias Ncube, Community
Programmes Manager
Emeldah Nkomo, Village
Banking Coordinator
Forgé Wilson,
Office Manager
Sylvia Nyakujawa, Bookkeeper
Dimbangombe Ranch and
Conservation Safaris:
Roger Parry, Manager
Trish Pullen,
Assistant Manager, Catering
Richard Nsinganu, Assistant
Manager, Safaris
Albert Chauke,
Ranch Foreman
Africa Centre for Holistic Management
(A subsidiary of the Allan Savory Center for
Holistic Management since 1992)
To order products inAustralia/New Zealand or southern Africa contact:
Australia: Holistic Decision Making Association, Irene Dasey, P.O. Box 543,
Inverell NSW 2360, tel: 61-2-6721-0123; [email protected]
South Africa: Whole Concepts cc, PO Box 1806, Vryburg 8600;
tel/fax: 27-53-9274367; [email protected]