07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
-
Upload
nguyen-ngoc-canh -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
1/28
Freq.Sharing-GSO Sat.Coordination
How to Optimize a Filing to besubmitted to ITU ?
1
Jorge CiccorossiBR/SSD/SSC
ITU-R World Radiocommunication Seminar - Geneva, 6-10 December 2010
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected] -
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
2/28
Summary:
1) How to Identify Satellite Networks and otherSystems for which Coordination is Required ?
2) Several Interference Criteria utilized to evaluatecompatibility between GSO satellite networks.
Trigger Arc
DT/T
C/I
3) Possible methods to be used to facilitatecoordination and sharing scenario between GSO.
4) How to optimize a filing to be submitted to ITU ?
2
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
3/28
3
Identification of Coordination Requirements
Appendix 5 indicates technical criteria utilized in every case, including:
Regulatory provision containing form of coordination
Sharing scenario associated to the case
Frequency Band and Region
Services
Threshold/condition
Calculation Method
See Table 5-1, Table 5-2 and Annex 1 to AP5
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
4/28
4
Criterion of Coordination Arc:
To identify satellites with frequency overlap operating in thesame direction inside the window of 8 to 10 , or 16degrees from nominal orbital longitud, depending on the
frequency band and service.
Applicable to satellite networks in FSS (non plan)BSS (non plan)Meteorological-Satelliteassociated Space Operations
in specific frequency bands ( see AP5 )
Utilized by BR to identify coordination requirements.
Coordination between GSO/GSO under provision 9.7
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
5/28
5
Coordination between GSO/GSO under provision 9.7Coordination Arc is applied
Simple but Useful Exercise:
Approach Identifying Satellite Networks with which coordination may be required by using:SNS-Online or SpaceQuery: SNS Online Link http://www.itu.int/sns/query_builder.html
FrequencyBand
GSO Window=20 E 10 degrees
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
6/28
6
Coordination between GSO/GSO under provision 9.7Result of Exercise of Coordination Arc Approach
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
7/28
Coordination between GSO/GSO under provision 9.7
Criterion ofT/T > 6 %
Mask used by BR to establish coordination requirements inany other scenario where CA is not applicable.
Utilized by Administrations to request BR to include or
exclude networks in coordination process under No.9.41
Described by Appendix 8 to RR.
It measures the increase of Noise Temperature at Rx due
to Interference as a generic method.
It does not take into account: - wanted signal.
- interfering spectrum shape
T/T > 6 % => Potential Harmful InterferenceFurther detailed analysis is needed to ensure that
coordination is really needed ( e.g. C/I )
T/T 6 % => No Harmful Interference7
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
8/28
T/T : Introduction to General Method
8
Wanted sat. network
pgt
grT (K)
T (K)
Interfering sat. network
T / T = (p gt gr ) / KLT
AP8 describes the methodincluding definitions
p rs
p re
Ts
Te
TxES
RxES
Transmission gain : Valid for Simple Freq. Changing Transponders (Bent Pipe ) only. Not applicable when satellite has on-board signal processing
(digital regenerating transponders, change of modulation, etc).This case requires separate treatment of up and downlinks.
= pre/prs Power received at the earth stn.Power received at the satelliteEquivalent Satellite Link Noise Temperature:
T= Te + Ts (K)
Interfering power density level
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
9/28
S(Interfering)
9
S (Wanted)
w
G4(w)
ps
T / T = 10log(ps) + G`3 LD + G4(w) K TE (dB)
G`3
TeTe
LD
T / T=TE / TE
Freq.Overlap in Downlink only
T/T Case I : Freq. Overlap Co-DirectionalSeparate treatment of Up and Downlink
(Wanted Satellite has on-board signal processing)
i
G1(i)
G2
TsTs
S(Interfering)S (Wanted)
pe
Lu
T / T = 10log(pe) + G`1(i) LU + G2 KTS (dB)T / T =TS / TS
Freq.Overlap in Uplink only
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
10/28
S (Wanted)S(Interfering)
10
.
Simple Freq.Changing Transponder (Bent Pipe)Freq. Overlap Uplink Only
i
G1(i)
G2TsTs
pe
LU
Te
T / T = 10log + 10log(pe) +G`1(i) LU+G2 K T (dB)
T =Te+ Ts
T / T = Ts/T
T/T Case I : Freq. Overlap Co-Directional
TeTe
Ts
LD
G4(w)
ps G`3
w
T / T = 10log(ps) +G`3 - LD + G4 (W) - K T (dB)
T =Te+ Ts
T / T =TE / T
S (Wanted)S (Interfering)Freq. Overlap Downlink Only
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
11/28
S(Interfering)S (Wanted)
11
Freq.Overlap in both links
T/T= (Te + Ts ) / T
iw
G1(i)
pe
ps
G4(w)
G2
TsTs
TeTe
LU
LD
G`3
T =Te+ Ts
T/T Case I : Freq. Overlap Co-DirectionalSimple Freq.Changing Transponder (Bent Pipe)
T / T = ( ps g`3 g4 (W) ) / (k lD T) + (pe g`1(i) g2 ) / (k lU T)
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
12/28
S(Interfering)
12
Downlink (interfering) overlaps Uplink(wanted)
S (Wanted)
T/T = 10log + 10log(ps) +G`3 (s) - Ls + G2 (s) -K -T(dB)
S
S
ps LSG`3(S) G2(S) Ts
Ts
Te
T =Te+ Ts
T/T = Ts / T
T/T Case II: Freq.Overlap in Opposite Direction of Tx.(Inter-Satellite)
ps G`3(s) LS G2(s)
Ss
TsTs
T / T = 10log(ps) + G`3 (s) - Ls + G2 (s) K Ts (dB)
S(Interfering) Separate treatment of up & down links
T / T =TS / TS
Wanted Satellite has Simple Freq. Changing TXP (bent-pipe)
S (Wanted)
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
13/2813
Coordination between GSO/GSO under provision 9.7
C/I Criterion
Utilized by BR to perform detailed examination of probability ofharmful interference when so requested by Administrationsunder No.11.32A of RR.
Based on methodology and protection criteria defined byREC ITU-R S.741-2 and associated Rule of Procedure
from RRB, or by common agreement between Adms. It takes into account: - Wanted signal
(level and type of carrier-modulation)
- Interfering signal
(level and spectrum shape)- Overlapped BandWidth
More accurate to perform inter-networks sharing analysis,based on quality and availability objectives.
Used by operators in coordination meetings.
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
14/2814
Concept of C/I:
C/I = C/N + KProtection ratio
( generally, between 12.2 14 dB, depending on the type of carriers )
Result of your Link Budget
( considering objectives like S/N or BER, availability, etc )
Protection required to ensure compatibility between networks
**C/I examination will be presented in detail in a separate document**
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
15/2815
Interference: Criteria and typical values
C/I C/N C/(N+I)
Degradation D( C/(N+I)) Delta (dB)D(C/(N+I)) = 10log(1+i/n)
C
I+N
N=KTB
I
BW
I/N=-12 dB Degradation @ 0.26 dB T/T = 6%I/N=-10 dB
0.4 dBI/N=- 6 dB 1 dB
For a single interference source.
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
16/2816
Worst case given by
I Total = 10.log [ 10( I1 / 10) + 10( I2 / 10) ++ 10( In / 10) ]
where ITotal, I1, I2...In are in dBW.
In terms of C/I:
1
c/i Total =1 1 1
+ +c/i Adj. Sat. c/i Terrest c/i Other
Multiple Interference Sources:
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
17/2817
Future Scenarios:
WRC12 and other future conferences may modify the currentcriteria to establish coordination requirements, including the
extension of CA to other bands and services (Resolution 901)
Following aspects and combination of them are included inthe proposals:
Reduction of CA in certain portions of C and Ku bands
Introduction of PFD Hard/Trigger Limits on Earths Surface and GSO
Limitation of 9.41 under certain conditions of PFD outside CA
Elimination of CA criterion => DT/T only for FSS C and Ku bands
No Change
*Detailed Information of proposals and background of discussionsmay be found under Chapter 5/7/3 Draft CPM Report to WRC12.
SG4 and WP4A constantly consider updates to currentinterfering criteria, based on studies using latest technologies
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
18/2818
Methods to facilitate coordination andsharing scenario between GSO
Frequency Separation
- Band Segmentation
- Channeling Plan
Polarization
Improvement of antenna system spatial discrimination
-Design of Antenna gain contours, roll-off and service areas associated to
satellite beams
- Modifying antenna diameters in the ground segment
- Improvement to Earth Station Radiation Pattern
To Adjust orbital separation between adjacent satellites.
To Reorganize distribution of diferent types of carrier.
Use of advanced modulation/FEC technologies (eg. DVB-S2), signal coding andprocessing techniques (spread spectrum or CDMA, etc).
Re-engineering of the link budget, including modulation-FEC, power densitylevels, adjusting Quality and Availavibility Objectives in order to toleratehigher levels of interference.
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
19/2819
Frequencies - Polarizations
Satellite 1
Satellite 2
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
20/2820
Space Segment Spatial Discrimination
0.00
0.00
-6.00
-2.00
-10.00
-4.00
-20.00
0.00
-2.00
-4.00
-6.00
-10.00
-20.00
0.00
-30.00
-20.00
-10.00
-10.00
-6.00
-6.00
-4.00
-4.0
-4.00
-2.00
-2.00
-1.20
-1.20
0.00
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
21/28
21
Modifying Orbital Separation:
Exercise:
Assuming D/ = 100 ; ES Antenna Paterns REC 465-5 / REC 580-6
Interference Reduction:
If- Ii = 25.log (i / f)
where f: minimum final separation between satellites
i: minimum initial separation between satellites
Scenario 1
1n-2n = 2 Nominal Orbital Separation1 = 2 = 0.1 E-W Station Keeping
Interference Reduction with respect to Scenario 1
Scenario 21n-2n = 31 = 2 = 0.1 If- Ii = 25.log (1.8 / 2.8 ) = -4.8 dB
Warning: From Regulatory point of view, it may be an Impact of New CoordinationRequirements in some cases due to increase of interference to other satellites
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
22/28
BR / SSD / SNP 22
Gain (phi)
-20-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
Ground Segment: Improving the Earth Station Radiation Pattern
Antenna Radiation Patterns ComparisonSidelobes
Gain (phi)
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Phi [deg]
G
[dBi]
AP8 REC-465-5 A - 25 LOG (phi) REC-580-6 ABCD log
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
23/28
23
Changing the Earth Station Antenna Diameter:
Gain (phi)
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Phi [deg]
G[
dBi]
Antenna A Antenna B
Ga max [dBi]= 43.2
Gb max [dBi]= 56
Antenna A
G1 = 23.34
Phi m = 1.50
D/L = 59.40
Phi r = 1.68
Phi b= 47.86
Beamwidth= 1.17
Antenna B
G1 = 35.21
Phi m = 0.35
D/L = 259.28
Phi r = 0.56
Phi b= 47.86
Beamwidth= 0.27
REFERENCES - COMMENTS:
Antenna A= Typical 1.2M
Antenna B= Typical 13M
Mainlobe and Near-Sidelobes
REC-580-6 Antenna Pattern
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
24/28
24
Reorganizing distribution of different types of carrier
To identify diferent types of carriers such as:
TT&C Analog TV/FM
Digital Data
To consider their characteristics of diversity in terms of BW,
Max. Power and spectral density distribution.
To group them in the frequency domain taking into accountthe distribution of similar carriers used by neighboring
satellites.
Off-axis eirp masks associated to type of carriers andfrequency bands, as well as operational restrictions orrelaxations, may be agreed during the coordination process.
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
25/28
25
How to Optimize a Filing to be submitted to ITU ?
Goal ? Favorable Findings+ Realistic Info To Ensure Recording+ Accuracy MIFR
Positive Cycle for current & future networks
Administrations are free to choose the way to organize a filing
Coordination Request: -needs certain flexibility of parameters-may be a General Approach
-specificNotification: -accurate parameters
-realistic
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
26/28
26
Filing is Group Structured
Diversity of: Beam/Service Areas Frequencies Emissions Earth Stations
Reorganize Filing considering diversity of frequency
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
27/28
27
Reorganize Filing considering diversity of frequencyassignments and respective progress in coordination
For example: To split groups of frequency assignments by
Group 11 SA 1 Coord. Completed Fav. Finding MIFR-Beam/Service Areas
Group 12 SA 2 Coord. Not Completed Further progressis required
-Frequencies ( similar process )
-Emissions ( similar process )
Group 21 Typical 9m Coord. Completed Fav. Finding MIFR-Earth Stations
Group 22 Typical 1.2m Coord.Not Completed Further progressis required
Remarks: locating worst cases in separated groups will ensure recordingof successfully coordinated frequency assignments.
-
8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC
28/28
Questions ?
*Text Document Frequency Sharing and Satellite Coordination between
GSO Networks. How to optimize a filing to be submitted to ITU ? complements this presentation providing further information and references.