07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC

8/4/2019 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC

1/28

Freq.Sharing-GSO Sat.Coordination

How to Optimize a Filing to besubmitted to ITU ?

1

Jorge CiccorossiBR/SSD/SSC

[email protected]

ITU-R World Radiocommunication Seminar - Geneva, 6-10 December 2010
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


2/28

Summary:

1) How to Identify Satellite Networks and otherSystems for which Coordination is Required ?

2) Several Interference Criteria utilized to evaluatecompatibility between GSO satellite networks.

Trigger Arc

DT/T

C/I

3) Possible methods to be used to facilitatecoordination and sharing scenario between GSO.

4) How to optimize a filing to be submitted to ITU ?

2


3/28

3

Identification of Coordination Requirements

Appendix 5 indicates technical criteria utilized in every case, including:

Regulatory provision containing form of coordination

Sharing scenario associated to the case

Frequency Band and Region

Services

Threshold/condition

Calculation Method

See Table 5-1, Table 5-2 and Annex 1 to AP5


4/28

4

Criterion of Coordination Arc:

To identify satellites with frequency overlap operating in thesame direction inside the window of 8 to 10 , or 16degrees from nominal orbital longitud, depending on the

frequency band and service.

Applicable to satellite networks in FSS (non plan)BSS (non plan)Meteorological-Satelliteassociated Space Operations

in specific frequency bands ( see AP5 )

Utilized by BR to identify coordination requirements.

Coordination between GSO/GSO under provision 9.7


5/28

5

Coordination between GSO/GSO under provision 9.7Coordination Arc is applied

Simple but Useful Exercise:

Approach Identifying Satellite Networks with which coordination may be required by using:SNS-Online or SpaceQuery: SNS Online Link http://www.itu.int/sns/query_builder.html

FrequencyBand

GSO Window=20 E 10 degrees


6/28

6

Coordination between GSO/GSO under provision 9.7Result of Exercise of Coordination Arc Approach


7/28


Criterion ofT/T > 6 %

Mask used by BR to establish coordination requirements inany other scenario where CA is not applicable.

Utilized by Administrations to request BR to include or

exclude networks in coordination process under No.9.41

Described by Appendix 8 to RR.

It measures the increase of Noise Temperature at Rx due

to Interference as a generic method.

It does not take into account: - wanted signal.

- interfering spectrum shape

T/T > 6 % => Potential Harmful InterferenceFurther detailed analysis is needed to ensure that

coordination is really needed ( e.g. C/I )

T/T 6 % => No Harmful Interference7


8/28

T/T : Introduction to General Method

8

Wanted sat. network

pgt

grT (K)

T (K)

Interfering sat. network

T / T = (p gt gr ) / KLT

AP8 describes the methodincluding definitions

p rs

p re

Ts

Te

TxES

RxES

Transmission gain : Valid for Simple Freq. Changing Transponders (Bent Pipe ) only. Not applicable when satellite has on-board signal processing

(digital regenerating transponders, change of modulation, etc).This case requires separate treatment of up and downlinks.

= pre/prs Power received at the earth stn.Power received at the satelliteEquivalent Satellite Link Noise Temperature:

T= Te + Ts (K)

Interfering power density level


9/28

S(Interfering)

9

S (Wanted)

w

G4(w)

ps

T / T = 10log(ps) + G`3 LD + G4(w) K TE (dB)

G`3

TeTe

LD

T / T=TE / TE

Freq.Overlap in Downlink only

T/T Case I : Freq. Overlap Co-DirectionalSeparate treatment of Up and Downlink

(Wanted Satellite has on-board signal processing)

i

G1(i)

G2

TsTs

S(Interfering)S (Wanted)

pe

Lu

T / T = 10log(pe) + G`1(i) LU + G2 KTS (dB)T / T =TS / TS

Freq.Overlap in Uplink only


10/28

S (Wanted)S(Interfering)

10

.

Simple Freq.Changing Transponder (Bent Pipe)Freq. Overlap Uplink Only

i

G1(i)

G2TsTs

pe

LU

Te

T / T = 10log + 10log(pe) +G`1(i) LU+G2 K T (dB)

T =Te+ Ts

T / T = Ts/T

T/T Case I : Freq. Overlap Co-Directional

TeTe

Ts

LD

G4(w)

ps G`3

w

T / T = 10log(ps) +G`3 - LD + G4 (W) - K T (dB)

T =Te+ Ts

T / T =TE / T

S (Wanted)S (Interfering)Freq. Overlap Downlink Only


11/28

S(Interfering)S (Wanted)

11

Freq.Overlap in both links

T/T= (Te + Ts ) / T

iw

G1(i)

pe

ps

G4(w)

G2

TsTs

TeTe

LU

LD

G`3

T =Te+ Ts

T/T Case I : Freq. Overlap Co-DirectionalSimple Freq.Changing Transponder (Bent Pipe)

T / T = ( ps g`3 g4 (W) ) / (k lD T) + (pe g`1(i) g2 ) / (k lU T)


12/28

S(Interfering)

12

Downlink (interfering) overlaps Uplink(wanted)

S (Wanted)

T/T = 10log + 10log(ps) +G`3 (s) - Ls + G2 (s) -K -T(dB)

S

S

ps LSG`3(S) G2(S) Ts

Ts

Te

T =Te+ Ts

T/T = Ts / T

T/T Case II: Freq.Overlap in Opposite Direction of Tx.(Inter-Satellite)

ps G`3(s) LS G2(s)

Ss

TsTs

T / T = 10log(ps) + G`3 (s) - Ls + G2 (s) K Ts (dB)

S(Interfering) Separate treatment of up & down links

T / T =TS / TS

Wanted Satellite has Simple Freq. Changing TXP (bent-pipe)

S (Wanted)


13/2813


C/I Criterion

Utilized by BR to perform detailed examination of probability ofharmful interference when so requested by Administrationsunder No.11.32A of RR.

Based on methodology and protection criteria defined byREC ITU-R S.741-2 and associated Rule of Procedure

from RRB, or by common agreement between Adms. It takes into account: - Wanted signal

(level and type of carrier-modulation)

- Interfering signal

(level and spectrum shape)- Overlapped BandWidth

More accurate to perform inter-networks sharing analysis,based on quality and availability objectives.

Used by operators in coordination meetings.


14/2814

Concept of C/I:

C/I = C/N + KProtection ratio

( generally, between 12.2 14 dB, depending on the type of carriers )

Result of your Link Budget

( considering objectives like S/N or BER, availability, etc )

Protection required to ensure compatibility between networks

**C/I examination will be presented in detail in a separate document**


15/2815

Interference: Criteria and typical values

C/I C/N C/(N+I)

Degradation D( C/(N+I)) Delta (dB)D(C/(N+I)) = 10log(1+i/n)

C

I+N

N=KTB

I

BW

I/N=-12 dB Degradation @ 0.26 dB T/T = 6%I/N=-10 dB

0.4 dBI/N=- 6 dB 1 dB

For a single interference source.


16/2816

Worst case given by

I Total = 10.log [ 10( I1 / 10) + 10( I2 / 10) ++ 10( In / 10) ]

where ITotal, I1, I2...In are in dBW.

In terms of C/I:

1

c/i Total =1 1 1

+ +c/i Adj. Sat. c/i Terrest c/i Other

Multiple Interference Sources:


17/2817

Future Scenarios:

WRC12 and other future conferences may modify the currentcriteria to establish coordination requirements, including the

extension of CA to other bands and services (Resolution 901)

Following aspects and combination of them are included inthe proposals:

Reduction of CA in certain portions of C and Ku bands

Introduction of PFD Hard/Trigger Limits on Earths Surface and GSO

Limitation of 9.41 under certain conditions of PFD outside CA

Elimination of CA criterion => DT/T only for FSS C and Ku bands

No Change

*Detailed Information of proposals and background of discussionsmay be found under Chapter 5/7/3 Draft CPM Report to WRC12.

SG4 and WP4A constantly consider updates to currentinterfering criteria, based on studies using latest technologies


18/2818

Methods to facilitate coordination andsharing scenario between GSO

Frequency Separation

- Band Segmentation

- Channeling Plan

Polarization

Improvement of antenna system spatial discrimination

-Design of Antenna gain contours, roll-off and service areas associated to

satellite beams

- Modifying antenna diameters in the ground segment

- Improvement to Earth Station Radiation Pattern

To Adjust orbital separation between adjacent satellites.

To Reorganize distribution of diferent types of carrier.

Use of advanced modulation/FEC technologies (eg. DVB-S2), signal coding andprocessing techniques (spread spectrum or CDMA, etc).

Re-engineering of the link budget, including modulation-FEC, power densitylevels, adjusting Quality and Availavibility Objectives in order to toleratehigher levels of interference.


19/2819

Frequencies - Polarizations

Satellite 1

Satellite 2


20/2820

Space Segment Spatial Discrimination

0.00

0.00

-6.00

-2.00

-10.00

-4.00

-20.00

0.00

-2.00

-4.00

-6.00

-10.00

-20.00

0.00

-30.00

-20.00

-10.00

-10.00

-6.00

-6.00

-4.00

-4.0

-4.00

-2.00

-2.00

-1.20

-1.20

0.00


21/28

21

Modifying Orbital Separation:

Exercise:

Assuming D/ = 100 ; ES Antenna Paterns REC 465-5 / REC 580-6

Interference Reduction:

If- Ii = 25.log (i / f)

where f: minimum final separation between satellites

i: minimum initial separation between satellites

Scenario 1

1n-2n = 2 Nominal Orbital Separation1 = 2 = 0.1 E-W Station Keeping

Interference Reduction with respect to Scenario 1

Scenario 21n-2n = 31 = 2 = 0.1 If- Ii = 25.log (1.8 / 2.8 ) = -4.8 dB

Warning: From Regulatory point of view, it may be an Impact of New CoordinationRequirements in some cases due to increase of interference to other satellites


22/28

BR / SSD / SNP 22

Gain (phi)

-20-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

Ground Segment: Improving the Earth Station Radiation Pattern

Antenna Radiation Patterns ComparisonSidelobes

Gain (phi)

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Phi [deg]

G

[dBi]

AP8 REC-465-5 A - 25 LOG (phi) REC-580-6 ABCD log


23/28

23

Changing the Earth Station Antenna Diameter:

Gain (phi)

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Phi [deg]

G[

dBi]

Antenna A Antenna B

Ga max [dBi]= 43.2

Gb max [dBi]= 56

Antenna A

G1 = 23.34

Phi m = 1.50

D/L = 59.40

Phi r = 1.68

Phi b= 47.86

Beamwidth= 1.17

Antenna B

G1 = 35.21

Phi m = 0.35

D/L = 259.28

Phi r = 0.56

Phi b= 47.86

Beamwidth= 0.27

REFERENCES - COMMENTS:

Antenna A= Typical 1.2M

Antenna B= Typical 13M

Mainlobe and Near-Sidelobes

REC-580-6 Antenna Pattern


24/28

24

Reorganizing distribution of different types of carrier

To identify diferent types of carriers such as:

TT&C Analog TV/FM

Digital Data

To consider their characteristics of diversity in terms of BW,

Max. Power and spectral density distribution.

To group them in the frequency domain taking into accountthe distribution of similar carriers used by neighboring

satellites.

Off-axis eirp masks associated to type of carriers andfrequency bands, as well as operational restrictions orrelaxations, may be agreed during the coordination process.


25/28

25

How to Optimize a Filing to be submitted to ITU ?

Goal ? Favorable Findings+ Realistic Info To Ensure Recording+ Accuracy MIFR

Positive Cycle for current & future networks

Administrations are free to choose the way to organize a filing

Coordination Request: -needs certain flexibility of parameters-may be a General Approach

-specificNotification: -accurate parameters

-realistic


26/28

26

Filing is Group Structured

Diversity of: Beam/Service Areas Frequencies Emissions Earth Stations

Reorganize Filing considering diversity of frequency


27/28

27

Reorganize Filing considering diversity of frequencyassignments and respective progress in coordination

For example: To split groups of frequency assignments by

Group 11 SA 1 Coord. Completed Fav. Finding MIFR-Beam/Service Areas

Group 12 SA 2 Coord. Not Completed Further progressis required

-Frequencies ( similar process )

-Emissions ( similar process )

Group 21 Typical 9m Coord. Completed Fav. Finding MIFR-Earth Stations

Group 22 Typical 1.2m Coord.Not Completed Further progressis required

Remarks: locating worst cases in separated groups will ensure recordingof successfully coordinated frequency assignments.


28/28

Questions ?

*Text Document Frequency Sharing and Satellite Coordination between

GSO Networks. How to optimize a filing to be submitted to ITU ? complements this presentation providing further information and references.

07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC

Documents

Transcript of 07-FreqShar and GSO Coord-Optimizing Filing-e - JC