05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

175
1 U NIVERSITY OF SONORA ENGINEERING DIVISION Sustainability Program All rights reserved © 2013. Esquer, Javier; Velazquez, Luis; Munguia, Nora; Zavala, Andrea. Sustainable Development Group. University of Sonora.

description

Cleaner production program. Unison.

Transcript of 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Page 1: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

1

UNIVERSITY OF SONORAENGINEERING DIVISION

Sustainability

Program

All rights reserved © 2013.

Esquer, Javier; Velazquez, Luis;

Munguia, Nora; Zavala, Andrea.

Sustainable Development Group.

University of Sonora.

Page 2: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Sustainability Program

An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention.

U.S. EPA, (2001), EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Based from:

The Nothing to Waste Program:

Incorporating Pollution Prevention into Small Businesses.Green Zia Environmental Excellence Program, (n.d.), New Mexico.

Industrial Pollution Prevention Handbook.Freeman, H., (1995), Mc Graw Hill.

Cleaner Production for Small and Medium Enterprises.USAID . (2006). http://www.encapafrica.org/SME/day1.htm

Fundamentals of industrial hygiene.Plog, B.A. and Quinlan, P.J. (eds.), (2002), National Safety Council, 5th ed.

© 2013. Esquer, J.; Velazquez, L.; Munguia, N.; Zavala, A. Sustainable Development Group. University of Sonora.

Toxics Use Reduction Institute.TURI. (2011). http://www.turi.org

Page 3: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

III. Process

Characterization*

II. Getting

Started (Planning)*

IV. Occupational &

Environmental Risks

Assessment*

I. Top Management

Commitment

(Support)*

V. Occupational Health

& Safety Controls

Assessment*

VIII. Selecting and

Implementing

Options*

IX. Program

Evaluation*

VII. Technical &

Economic Evaluation*

X. Sustaining the

Program*

VI. Identifying

Opportunities*

Sustainability

Program

Page 4: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

USING PP TOOLS

There is an endless variety of different problem-solving and decision-

making tools available. Most of these tools have been used throughout

the world in a variety of quality programs for more than 50 years. Only in

the past 10 years or so have they been applied to PP projects.

The problem is that environmental managers are often unfamiliar with such

tools. This is beginning to change as more organizations seek to integrate

environmental programs into their core business practices. This

integration effort helps align the ways problems are addressed and

solved within the organization.

Page 5: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

And the the Open University's OpenLearn website. http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/file.php/3336/formats/print.htm

SYSTEMS APPROACH TOOLS

• An organization acts as a system.

• The Systems Approach looks at the whole organization, and the parts,

and the connections between the parts.

“Real-World”

Situation

Page 6: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

SYSTEMS APPROACH TOOLS

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

And the the Open University's OpenLearn website. http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/file.php/3336/formats/print.htm

The functionality of the parts depend on how they are connected.

Page 7: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

SYSTEMS APPROACH TOOLS

Processes that use resources and generate wastes do not always provide

synoptic information clearly suited for checklist-style presentation.

Page 8: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

SYSTEMS APPROACH TOOLS

The Systems Approach relies on intra-organizational teams, not individual

experts, to make decisions.

Page 9: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

SYSTEMS APPROACH TOOLS

It is important to identify the process-related reasons for

resource use and loss.

In this context, the Systems Approach

provides management with a

reasonably accurate profile of

process problems.

Page 10: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Using the Systems Approach Tools

• Process Mapping (Process characterization)

• Determining the Cost of the Loss (Activity-Based Costing)

• Selecting P2 Opportunities (80/20 Pareto Principle)

• Analyzing Root Causes (cause and effect, fishbone, diagram)

• Generating Alternative Solutions (Brainwriting)

• Selecting an Alternative for Implementation (Bubble-up/ bubble-down)

• Action Planning

Page 11: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

• Process Mapping

• Determining the Cost of the Loss

• Selecting P2 Opportunities

• Analyzing Root Causes

• Generating Alternative Solutions

• Selecting an Alternative for Implementation

• Action Planning

• Top Management Support

• Getting Started

• Characterize Process

• Assess Wastes & Identify Opportunities

• Cost Considerations

• Identify & Implement Options

• Program Evaluation

• Sustain Program

Green Zia / EPA´s Guide to PP

Freemans’ Ind. PP Handbook

Common links

Page 12: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

III. Process

Characterization*

II. Getting

Started (Planning)*

IV. Occupational &

Environmental Risks

Assessment*

I. Top Management

Commitment

(Support)*

V. Occupational Health

& Safety Controls

Assessment*

VIII. Selecting and

Implementing

Options*

IX. Program

Evaluation*

VII. Technical &

Economic Evaluation*

X. Sustaining the

Program*

VI. Identifying

Opportunities*

Sustainability

Program

Page 13: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Top Management Support.

On this step, the owner shows his/her acceptation to initiate a

Sustainability Program at the shop.

This means that he/she has been informed, and in certain way be

convinced, about the benefits that it would bring to the shop such as

increased productivity, improved service quality, occupational and

environmental health improvement, reduction of potential liability, etc.

Page 14: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Taking all this as a foundation, a Sustainability Policy Statement

has to be written.

This is a document outlining the commitment of the shop to the

sustainability and the ways it will be endorsed.

Because it is unlikely that a small shop has one at place, it is

necessary to create a sustainability policy statement on behalf them.

Preferably, do it along the owner,

at least taken into consideration his/her inputs.

Page 15: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

© Foursight Consulting Group Inc. Tayside Vision, Mission, & Values Workshop, April 2006.

http://www.foursightconsulting.com/ideas/tools/Quick%20Refernce%20-%20Creating%20Vision,%20Mission%20and%20Value%20Statements.pdf

Vision Statement (“What is our preferred future?”)

• A vision is a statement about what your organization wants to become.

• All members of the organization should be able to identify with it and it

should help them feel proud, excited, and part of something much bigger

than themselves.

• A vision should stretch the organization’s capabilities and image of itself.

• It gives shape and direction to the organization’s future.

• Visions range in length from a couple of words to several pages; the

shorter it is, the easier it is to remember.

• Effective vision statements are clear, concise, catchy and memorable.

Page 16: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Mission Statement (“What business are we in?”)

• When properly constructed, a mission statement should provide a clear,

concise description of an organization's overall purpose.

• A mission statement should answer three questions:

• What do we do?

• How do we do it?

• For whom do we do it?

• This can enable large groups of individuals to work in a unified direction

toward a common cause.

• A good mission statement is compelling, passionate, and energizing.

• It should be risky and challenging, but also achievable.

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

© Foursight Consulting Group Inc. Tayside Vision, Mission, & Values Workshop, April 2006.

http://www.foursightconsulting.com/ideas/tools/Quick%20Refernce%20-%20Creating%20Vision,%20Mission%20and%20Value%20Statements.pdf

Page 17: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Sustainability Policy (“Statement of Intent “)

• A Sustainability Policy is a ‘Statement of Intent’ that can be used to

communicate to staff and customers a commitment to improving

environmental and social sustainability over time.

• A Sustainability Policy establishes an overall sense of direction.

• As soon as your policy statement has been written, it is imperative that it

be formally adopted and ratified within your business.

Tourism and Events Queensland. Factsheet 1.3: Preparing a Sustainability Policy.

http://www.tq.com.au/fms/tq_corporate/industrydevelopment/Factsheet%201_3-Preparing%20a%20Sustainability%20Policy.pdf

Page 18: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

The University of Sonora is an autonomous, public institution of higher

education engaged in the training of professionals involved with the society in

its transition to sustainable lifestyles.

In the context of its mission, in its commitment to Sustainable Development, and

in recognition of the responsibility of human beings and their ability to take

and shape their destiny,…

… the institution adopts a sustainability policy that promotes in the university

community a culture aimed at preventing, eliminating and/or reducing

environmental and occupational hazards and negative impacts generated in

the fulfillment of its substantive functions of teaching, research and extension,

as well as in its administrative activities to be reflected in actions at local and

global levels, within and outside campus.

Example of Sustainability Policy

Page 19: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

III. Process

Characterization*

II. Getting

Started (Planning)*

IV. Occupational &

Environmental Risks

Assessment*

I. Top Management

Commitment

(Support)*

V. Occupational Health

& Safety Controls

Assessment*

VIII. Selecting and

Implementing

Options*

IX. Program

Evaluation*

VII. Technical &

Economic Evaluation*

X. Sustaining the

Program*

VI. Identifying

Opportunities*

Sustainability

Program

Page 20: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Getting Started.

This is basically the planning step of the Sustainability Program.

This includes pick up a leader, create a team, goal setting, a Gantt chart

and developing a written Sustainability Plan.

Leader. This is the person who is going to coordinate the program.

Page 21: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Team. Although the theory indicates to pick up key persons, called

champions, from several departments, it is unlikely you can do this at

a small shop.

However, the team can be created at least by the owner, a worker,

and the students.

The role’s student is to assist management to diagnosis problematic

situations and find optimal solution.

Therefore, the students MUST be theoretical prepared to give

pragmatic solutions to real problems.

Page 22: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Gantt chart. This is a bar chart for scheduling the tasks of the

program. The time period will be each two weeks. The tasks are all

the steps of a Sustainability Program.

Written Sustainability Plan. It is the document that will be

used on the field to conduct the Sustainability Program. This is

pretty similar to your final project; however, there are some

differences; for instance, this does not include a literature analysis.

This must include all the steps of a Sustainability Program.

Page 23: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

INTEGRATING PROGRAMS

When getting started with a Sustainability Program, look around to see

what other types of “prevention” programs already exist in the

organization.

Typical Prevention Programs in Industry

• Environmental management systems (EMS)

• Quality management initiatives

• Preventive maintenance

• Health and safety programs (H&S)

• Insurance/risk management

Page 24: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

DEALING WITH CHANGE

• Instituting a Sustainability Program can facilitate change in an organization.

• Technical ability and operational knowledge are not sufficient by themselves.

Always you are

going to find

someone in

disagreement!

Page 25: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Seven things to be considered when starting a Sustainability Program

• Show results quickly!

• Add some level of complexity to the Sustainability Program.

• Present reason for change.

• Offer a compelling vision.

• Build a strong, committed management guiding team.

• Communicate, then

communicate some more.

• People do not resist their own ideas. Therefore,

involve the organization’s members in the change.

Page 26: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Questions to Consider During the Planning Process

• Where are we right now?

• Where do we want to go?

• How do we get there?

• When do we want to arrive?

• Who will get us there?

• What will it cost?

• How do we measure results?

• Who will help accomplish the plan?

• When will each goal be completed?

• What are the expected results?

Page 27: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Goals, Benchmarks, Targets, Gaps and Indicators: http://www.phabc.org/pdfcore/Performance_Management_Glossary.pdf

Goal (Objective) is a timeless statement of

aspiration, or the longer term, or ultimate

outcome to which an organization aspires.

Target is a specified level of performance for a

measure (indicator), and at a predetermined point

in time (i.e. achieve ‘x’ by’ y’ date).

Indicator is what we use to quantify a change in

performance (the progress, quality and

achievements). The key is to make sure that the

indicator is a reasonable, useful and meaningful

measure of the intended outcome.

Page 28: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Goal setting. At this point is really hard to establish goals because

you do not know anything about the shop; however, a strategic

objective can be defined.

In addition, establishing specific objectives and goals along with the

owner is necessary. As uncertainty predominant at this moment,

these goals can be set until a diagnosis be done.

Meanwhile, as a foundation all teams will have the objectives

provided at follows:

Page 29: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Strategic Objective

Potentially prevent, eliminate and/or reduce environmental and occupational

hazards that might be generated in ... [name of organization or activity].

Specific Objectives

• Conduct a literature review of the state of the art concerning the

sustainability of ... [activity, process, organization, industry, etc.].

• Obtain the top management commitment to permit the proper support for a

Sustainability Program for ... [activity, process, organization, industry, etc.].

• Characterize, identify and evaluate environmental and/or occupational risks

along the system to define opportunities for prevention.

• Design and propose the Sustainability Program that serves as a tool for

decision-making process.

• Implement the Sustainability Program.

Sustainability Program

Page 30: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Statement of Targets

• These are specific statements that express where the organization wishes to

go within a specific time period (e.g., this financial quarter).

• Many Sustainability Programs state quantitative and specific targets of both

a short-term and long-term nature.

• Once they are set, it is important to measure their progress over time.

Page 31: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Example for Statement of Targets

• By 2009, concentration of contaminants in water has decreased by 10%.

• Reduce 25% effluent emissions of key parameters (such as mercury, PCBs,

dioxin, aldrin, and toxaphene) by September 2011.

• Increase worker involvement by 100% within January and June 2011.

• By 2012, pollution prevention and other emission controls result in decreases

of 80% of PCB, dioxin, and mercury releases.

Page 32: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Indicators

• An indicator is a metric that helps you understand where you are, which way

you are going, and how far you are from where you want to be.

• Indicators are used to express the outcomes of the performance

improvements that are made in the Sustainability Program.

• These environmental results actually link the performance indicators with the

cost to and benefits for the organization.

• Sustainable development programs use indicators that link economy,

environment, and the community.

Page 33: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Indicators can be based:

• at the organizational level (e.g., environmental training hours per

worker) or

• at the government level (e.g., area-wide greenhouse gas

concentrations, or acres of trees impacted by acid rain).

Page 34: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Example of Indicators

• Number of people going to clinics for respiratory problems.

• Ratio of renewable to non-renewable energy consumption.

• Tons of waste landfilled annually.

• Recycling rate as a percentage of material generated.

• Percentage of residents, businesses, and institutions that participate in

recycling programs.

• Number of hazardous materials incidents.

Page 35: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Quantitative indicators/targets are statistical measures

• ƒ Number

• ƒ Percent

• ƒ Rate (e.g. birth rate - Births per 1,000 population)

• ƒ Ratio (e.g. sex ratio – Number of males per number of females).

Qualitative indicators/targets imply qualitative assessments

• � Compliance with …

• � Quality of …

• � Extent of …

• � Level of …

Page 36: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Example of Goals, Targets and Indicators

Goal IndicatorTarget

• Improve

efficiency use

of resources.

• Volume of water (Lts) conserved

compared to the previous year.

• Amount of energy (MW) consumption

per year, per unit of product..

• Amount of energy (MW) saved due to

energy conservation programs.

• Reduce water consumption at

metered sites across its estate by

5% over a three-year period from

April 1999 to March 2002.

• Reduce energy consumption by

11% over the five year period

from April 1997 to March 2002

(1997 target).

• Reduce

company-wide

wastes.

• Total volume (Tons) of waste.

• Weight (Tons) of a specific waste per

unit of production.

• % of waste recycled, treated and

disposed.

• Quantity (Kg) of hazardous waste

eliminated due to material

substitution.

• Reduce waste going to landfill by

5%, based on landfill tax paid, for

the year 1999/2000.

• Increase total recycling in terms

of weight by 10% between April

1999 and March 2000.

• Phase out the portable Halon

(CFC) fire extinguishers by March

2003.

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio. and http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/misc/corp-env/epd-eng/chapter3.htm

Page 37: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Creating Goals, Targets, and Indicators

Create TWO statements of goals

with their targets and indicators for a

Photo frame-making company

Page 38: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

III. Process

Characterization*

II. Getting

Started (Planning)*

IV. Occupational &

Environmental Risks

Assessment*

I. Top Management

Commitment

(Support)*

V. Occupational Health

& Safety Controls

Assessment*

VIII. Selecting and

Implementing

Options*

IX. Program

Evaluation*

VII. Technical &

Economic Evaluation*

X. Sustaining the

Program*

VI. Identifying

Opportunities*

Sustainability

Program

Page 39: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Materials

Energy

Water

By-Products

Solid

Waste

(trash)

Air Emissions

Products

Heat

Loss

Hazardous

Waste

Waste-

water

INPUTS

WASTES

WASTES

Improving MSME Performance through Cleaner Production. Module 5: The CP Process & Tools. Source: www.encapafrica.org.

Allowance breakage contaminated solids core loss customer returns damage

drainings dust evaporation furnace loss greenhouse loss hidden losses leakage

overfill non-conforming material packaging process loss rework second quality

stock loss washings

Waste comes in

many forms . . .

. . . and has many

different sources

Page 40: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Un

ders

tan

din

g t

he P

rocess

Pro

du

cti

on

Flo

wch

art

Mark the appropriate method and type

Method: Current Proposed

Type: Worker Material Machine/Eq.

2

1

5 Step "E"

3

4 Step "D"

0.5 1.5

3 Step "C"

5

2 Step "B"

1 Step "A"

Step Description of Activity SymbolTime

(minutes)

Distance

(meters)Recommended Method

1.5

Cost

Storage 0

Comments:Time (min) 11.5

Distance

(m)

Delay 1

Inspection 1

Plant/Facility: West Plant Operation 2

Written By: BHO Team: Task Force OneTranspor-

tation1

Part: ABC Plane No.: 05 Summary

Part No.: 53b Department: Final Assembly Activity Proposed Current Saving

Page 41: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Process Mapping

Process characterization is to describe inputs and outputs along the process

for non-product loses or resources use through a process mapping tool.

All supporting operations - —both ancillary and intermittent - —can be depicted to

see how they impact the main process.

Inputs

Loses as: energy,

water, wastes, etc.

Process

flow

Inputs

Loses as: energy,

water, wastes, etc.

Process

flow

. . .Step “A” Step “B”

A useful initial data source is by identifying chemicals

from purchasing, inventory, and storage.

Page 42: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Process Mapping

An effective means to characterize processes is with a hierarchical

process map.

Much process documentation is then carefully filed away in reports or

databases that most people do not review on a regular basis.

This information may take the form of process flow diagrams, flow charts,

floor plans, or other schematic depictions.

Page 43: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Process Mapping

It has been widely recognized that most people can only “see” up to six

objects at a time and comprehend visually what they mean.

Hierarchical process maps allow only three (3) to six (6) objects on a page.

The entire process must be depicted in three to six boxes.

Sub-processes can be used to provide detail at the next level but are also

restricted to the three-to-six-box rule.

Page 44: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Process Mapping

In a Systems Approach, every work step is connected to every other

work step in this diagram, which depicts the entire system. There

are two very important rules associated with process mapping:

1. The process maps must help the Sustainability team understand

the process better than they could through other means.

2. These same process maps must help the

Sustainability team communicate what they plan to

accomplish to management and other interested

parties.

Page 45: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Process Mapping

Hierarchical Process Map Structure

Page 46: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Process Map for a Photo-developing procedure

Page 47: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Process Map for a Photo-developing procedure

Page 48: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Process Map for a Photo-developing procedureQuantity

for each

50 Lb

2 Lt

5 Lt

Page 49: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Process Map for a Handcrafted beaded jewelry company

Green Zia Environmental Excellence Program. (n.d.). The Nothing to Waste Program: Incorporating Pollution Prevention into Small Businesses. New Mexico.

Page 50: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Process Map for a Handcrafted beaded jewelry company

Green Zia Environmental Excellence Program. (n.d.). The Nothing to Waste Program: Incorporating Pollution Prevention into Small Businesses. New Mexico.

Page 51: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Green Zia Environmental Excellence Program. (n.d.). The Nothing to Waste Program: Incorporating Pollution Prevention into Small Businesses. New Mexico.

Process Map for a Handcrafted beaded jewelry company

Page 52: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Green Zia Environmental Excellence Program. (n.d.). The Nothing to Waste Program: Incorporating Pollution Prevention into Small Businesses. New Mexico.

Process Map for a Handcrafted beaded jewelry company

Page 53: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Using Maps as a Template

Some organizations think of a process as a single box with its inputs and

outputs. Using this model, it is difficult to change an entire process to

make pollution prevention happen.

By using the process map as a template, process documentation can be

organized by, and linked to, individual work steps in the process at the

lowest level.

All standard operating procedures (SOPs), best management practices

(BMPs), regulations, maintenance requirements, glossaries of terms, and

material safety data sheets (MSDSs) can be filed by work step using the

process maps.

Page 54: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Using Maps as a Template

Using process maps as a template helps an organization keep track of

resource use and loss by each work step in a main process, or in

supporting ancillary and intermittent processes. All resources (e.g.,

energy, water, and materials) can also be tracked on the same process

map.

The term non-product use means that the resource does not become part of

the interim or final product. The term non-product loss means that the

resource is lost in that work step as a waste, discharge, or emission.

Process losses can be classified by medium (air, water, solid waste,

spills/leaks, and accidental losses).

Page 55: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Process Mapping

Create a Process Map for a

General Auto Repair

(Use between 3 to 6 boxes)

Page 56: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Process Mapping

Process Map for a General Auto Repair

Green Zia Environmental Excellence Program. (n.d.). Auto Repair Shops: Guidance for improved environmental performance and pollution prevention in your auto repair business. New Mexico.

Page 57: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Process Mapping

Process Map for a General Auto Repair

Green Zia Environmental Excellence Program. (n.d.). Auto Repair Shops: Guidance for improved environmental performance and pollution prevention in your auto repair business. New Mexico.

Page 58: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Process Mapping

Process Map for a General Auto Repair

Green Zia Environmental Excellence Program. (n.d.). Auto Repair Shops: Guidance for improved environmental performance and pollution prevention in your auto repair business. New Mexico.

Page 59: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

III. Process

Characterization*

II. Getting

Started (Planning)*

IV. Occupational &

Environmental Risks

Assessment*

I. Top Management

Commitment

(Support)*

V. Occupational Health

& Safety Controls

Assessment*

VIII. Selecting and

Implementing

Options*

IX. Program

Evaluation*

VII. Technical &

Economic Evaluation*

X. Sustaining the

Program*

VI. Identifying

Opportunities*

Sustainability

Program

Page 60: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Classification of Risks

Risk

Occupational

Ch

em

ical

Ph

ysic

al

Erg

on

om

ic

Bio

log

ical

Psych

oso

cia

l

Oth

er

Environmental

Soil Water Air

Page 61: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Occupational Risks [MSDS may be used for reference]

• Chemical Hazards (toxic substances, vapors, etc.).

• Physical Hazards (noise, lighting, temperature, radiation, etc.).

STPS Official Mexican Standards (NOMs) can be used.

• Ergonomic Hazards (standing position, awkward postures,

repeated motions, etc.).

Working Posture Analysis (e.g. OWAS, RULA, or others).

• Biological Hazards (viruses, bacteria, etc.).

• Psychosocial Hazards (monotony, mental fatigue, etc.).

• Other Hazards (thrown wires along the floor, bad structure of

the walls, other insecure conditions).

Page 62: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Classification of Hazards

Hazards

Occupational

Ch

em

ical

Ph

ysic

al

Erg

on

om

ic

Bio

log

ical

Psych

oso

cia

l

Oth

er

Environmental

Soil Water Air

Page 63: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

CH

EM

ICA

LH

AZ

AR

DS

These arise from excessive airborne concentrations of mists, vapors,

gases, or solids in the form of dusts or fumes.

In addition to the hazard of inhalation, some of these materials may

act as skin irritants or may be toxic by absorption through the skin.

Page 64: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

CH

EM

ICA

LH

AZ

AR

DS

M S D S

Page 65: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

CHEMICAL HAZARDS M S D S

Page 66: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

CHEMICAL HAZARDS M S D S

Page 67: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/23/216_pH_Scale-01.jpg

"pH"

stands for

"power of hydrogen"

Page 68: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

M S D SCHEMICAL HAZARDS

Page 69: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

CHEMICAL HAZARDS M S D S

Page 70: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Carpentry Workshop example

Chemical CAS # Basic Form Exposure RoutesVapor

Pressure (VP)LEL %

Flash

Point oFOSHA PEL NIOSH REL

Ethyl methyl ketone,

MEK78-93-3

Class IB

Flammable Liquid

inhalation, ingestion,

skin and/or eye contact 78 mmHg

(200°F):

1.4%16°F

TWA 200 ppm (590

mg/m3)

TWA 200 ppm (590

mg/m3) ST 300 ppm

(885 mg/m3)

Toluene, Methyl

benzene108-88-3

Class IB

Flammable Liquid

inhalation, skin

absorption, ingestion,

skin and/or eye contact

21 mmHg 1.1 40°F

TWA 200 ppm C

300 ppm 500 ppm

(10-minute

maximum peak)

TWA 100 ppm (375

mg/m3) ST 150 ppm

(560 mg/m3)

butyl glycol, Ethylene

glycol monobutyl ether111-76-2

Class IIIA

Combustible Liquid

inhalation, skin

absorption, ingestion,

skin and/or eye contact

0.8 mmHg(200°F):

1.1%143°F

TWA 50 ppm (240

mg/m3) [skin]

TWA 5 ppm (24

mg/m3) [skin]

n-Butanol, n-Butyl

alcohol 71-36-3

Class IC

Flammable Liquid

inhalation, skin

absorption, ingestion,

skin and/or eye contact

6 mmHg 1.4 84°FTWA 100 ppm (300

mg/m3)

C 50 ppm (150

mg/m3) [skin]

p-Xylene [m-Xylene]106-42-3

[108-38-3]

Class IC

Flammable Liquid:

inhalation, skin

absorption, ingestion,

skin and/or eye contact

9 mmHg 1.1 81°F [82°F]TWA 100 ppm (435

mg/m3)

TWA 100 ppm (435

mg/m3) ST 150 ppm

(655 mg/m3)

Acetone 67-64-1Class IB

Flammable Liquid

inhalation, ingestion,

skin and/or eye contact 180 mmHg 2.5 0°F

TWA 1000 ppm

(2400 mg/m3)

TWA 250 ppm (590

mg/m3)

Reference: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards 2005:

http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgdcas.html

CHEMICAL HAZARDS

Chemical properties:

Page 71: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.completesafetysupply.com/index.php?cPath=30&main_page=product_info&products_id=805

http://cranessafetyinstitute.com/hazcom.php

CHEMICAL HAZARDS

Page 72: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Classification of Hazards

Hazards

Occupational

Ch

em

ical

Ph

ysic

al

Erg

on

om

ic

Bio

log

ical

Psych

oso

cia

l

Oth

er

Environmental

Soil Water Air

Page 73: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS

Problems caused by such things as noise, temperature extremes,

ionizing radiation (Radioactive materials emit energy that can

damage living tissue), nonionizing radiation (This is a form of

electromagnetic radiation with varying effects on the body, depending

largely on the wavelength of the radiation involved), and pressure

extremes are physical stresses.

Page 74: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.smu.edu/~/media/Site/BusinessFinance/OPRM/EHS/Radiation.ashx?la=en

Page 75: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.smu.edu/~/media/Site/BusinessFinance/OPRM/EHS/Radiation.ashx?la=en

Page 76: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.smu.edu/~/media/Site/BusinessFinance/OPRM/EHS/Radiation.ashx?la=en

Page 77: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Blacksmithing Workshop example

StandardNOM-011-STPS-2001

for Occupational Noise

NOM-025-STPS-2008 for

Occupational Lighting

NOM-015-STPS-2001 for

Occupational Temperature

Reference (for

kind of task)Less than 90 db 500 lux 26.7 °C

Recorded

(Average)63 db 495 lux 25.2 °C

NOM-011-STPS-2001 for Occupational Noise

NOM-025-STPS-2008 for Occupational Lighting

NOM-015-STPS-2001 for Occupational Temperature

PHYSICAL HAZARDS

Page 78: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Classification of Hazards

Hazards

Occupational

Ch

em

ical

Ph

ysic

al

Erg

on

om

ic

Bio

log

ical

Psych

oso

cia

l

Oth

er

Environmental

Soil Water Air

Page 79: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

ERGONOMIC HAZARDS

http://www.worxsite.com/ergoevals.shtml

The International Ergonomics Association defines ergonomics

as follows:

Ergonomics (or human factors) is the scientific discipline concerned

with the understanding of interactions among humans and other

elements of a system, and the profession that applies theory,

principles, data and methods to design in order to optimize human

well-being and overall system performance.

Page 80: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

ERGONOMIC HAZARDS

http://www.rula.co.uk/

http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng/old/mechanical/menu/class/downloads/notes/OWAS%20method.pdf

Technical note Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) Sue Hignett*,Lynn McAtamney. Applied Ergonomics 31 (2000) 201}205

http://www.safetynet.co.kr/ucc/Doc/2008227134434_12372.pdf

The Ovako Working posture Analysis System (OWAS)

Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA)

Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA)

REBA

Page 81: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Classification of Hazards

Hazards

Occupational

Ch

em

ical

Ph

ysic

al

Erg

on

om

ic

Bio

log

ical

Psych

oso

cia

l

Oth

er

Environmental

Soil Water Air

Page 82: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

BIOLOGICAL HAZARDS

Approximately 200 biological agents, such as infectious microorganisms,

biological allergens, and toxins, are known to produce infections or

allergenic, toxic, or carcinogenic reactions in workers.

Page 83: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

BIOLOGICAL HAZARDS

BAS Health and Safety Procedure No 10 // Version No – 01 // Date Effective - 1 October 2003 // Reviewed – 26 January 2005 // Biological Risk Assessment

http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/afi/docs/annex11.pdf

http://www.primalperformance.com.au/simple-primal-wisdom-microorganisms/

Factors affecting biological risk

Microorganisms

- Nature of the micro-organism

- Number of micro-organisms present

- Nature of the route of infection

- Susceptibility of the microorganism

to treatment.

- Susceptibility of the host.

Page 84: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

BIOLOGICAL HAZARDS

BAS Health and Safety Procedure No 10 // Version No – 01 // Date Effective - 1 October 2003 // Reviewed – 26 January 2005 // Biological Risk Assessment

http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/afi/docs/annex11.pdf

http://www.jashbotanicals.com/articles/natural_guide_allergies_asthma_2.html

Factors affecting biological risk

Allergens

- Previous medical history

- Duration of exposure

- Onset of sensitization

- Repeated exposures

Page 85: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

The biggest risks come from:

Hepatitis virus

BAS Health and Safety Procedure No 10 // Version No – 01 // Date Effective - 1 October 2003 // Reviewed – 26 January 2005 // Biological Risk Assessment

http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/afi/docs/annex11.pdf http://www.realmagick.com/biological-hazard/

Human immunodeficiency

virus (HIV)

Mycobacterium

Tuberculosis

Coliform bacilli

Handling materials

contaminated with human

body fluidsHandling specimens of

human blood

Taking Specimens of

Human Blood

BIOLOGICAL HAZARDS

Page 86: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Classification of Hazards

Hazards

Occupational

Ch

em

ical

Ph

ysic

al

Erg

on

om

ic

Bio

log

ical

Psych

oso

cia

l

Oth

er

Environmental

Soil Water Air

Page 87: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

PSYCHOSOCIAL HAZARDS

A critical review of psychosocial hazard measures. Prepared by The Institute for Employment Studies for the Health and Safety Executive. CONTRACT

RESEARCH REPORT. www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2001/crr01356.pdf

356/2001http://safesupervisor.com/category/info-to-go

Psychosocial hazards’ is used to refer

to work characteristics which could

equally be termed ‘stressors’ or

‘sources of stress’.

Page 88: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

A critical review of psychosocial hazard measures. Prepared by The Institute for Employment Studies for the Health and Safety Executive. CONTRACT

RESEARCH REPORT. www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2001/crr01356.pdf

• identify potential stress problems

• seek causes for existing problems which may be a consequence of work

psychosocial hazards

• examine the possible effects of organizational changes on perceptions of

psychosocial hazards

• help focus and target interventions

• identify particular groups who may be experiencing difficulties

• as part of more general employee attitude or opinion surveys

• alert line managers to problems or potential problems

• assess potential hazards as part of a risk assessment.

Some reasons why organizations collect information about psychosocial

hazards (stressors):

PSYCHOSOCIAL HAZARDS

Page 89: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Classification of Hazards

Hazards

Occupational

Ch

em

ical

Ph

ysic

al

Erg

on

om

ic

Bio

log

ical

Psych

oso

cia

l

Oth

er

Environmental

Soil Water Air

Page 90: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

OTHER HAZARDS

Just put those

safety awards

on the table

http://www.cartoonstock.com/directory/s/safety_officers.asp

http://listsoplenty.com/blog/?p=9297

http://www.accidenthelplinedirect.com/need-any-work-accident-compensation.html

Page 91: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Hazard type / Area Reception Laundry Drying Ironing Packaging Delivery

Chemical hazards

Exposure to substances like detergents, Perc, and others. X

Physical hazards

High noise level X X X

Poor lighting X X X X X X

High temperature X X X

Ergonomic hazards

Long standing position X X X X X X

Awkward postures X X X X X X

Bending movements X X X X

Biological hazards

Potential exposure to viruses and bacteria X

Psychosocial hazards

High working load X X X

Monotony / mental fatigue X X

Other hazards

Hoses in bad conditions X X X

Peeling Wires X X

Example: Summary Matrix for a Dry Cleaner

Page 92: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Classification of Hazards

Hazards

Occupational

Ch

em

ical

Ph

ysic

al

Erg

on

om

ic

Bio

log

ical

Psych

oso

cia

l

Oth

er

Environmental

Soil Water Air

Page 93: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Environmental Risks [MSDS may be used for reference]

• From Solids.

• From Effluent.

• From Air Emissions.

• Air Pollution

• Water contamination

• Soil/land contamination

• Hazardous waste generation

• Radioactive waste generation

• Acid Rain generation

• Ozone Depletion

• Global Warming

• Etc.

SourcesEffects

http://ensi.wi.vc/affected-by-pollution-5kx.html http://beautiful-views.com/air-and-water-pollution.html

http://postconflict.unep.ch/sudanreport/sudan_website/index_photos_2.php?key=water%20pollution

Page 94: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Occupational Risks Assessment

for a

General Auto Repair

• Chemical Hazards

• Physical Hazards

• Ergonomic Hazards

• Biological Hazards

• Psychosocial Hazards

• Other Hazards

Page 95: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

III. Process

Characterization*

II. Getting

Started (Planning)*

IV. Occupational &

Environmental Risks

Assessment*

I. Top Management

Commitment

(Support)*

V. Occupational Health

& Safety Controls

Assessment*

VIII. Selecting and

Implementing

Options*

IX. Program

Evaluation*

VII. Technical &

Economic Evaluation*

X. Sustaining the

Program*

VI. Identifying

Opportunities*

Sustainability

Program

Page 96: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Occupational Health & Safety Controls

• Engineering Controls.

• Administrative Controls.

• Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/safetyhealth/comp3.html

Page 97: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Occupational Health & Safety Controls

• Engineering Controls

http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/safetyhealth/comp3.html

The first and best strategy is to control the hazard at its source.

Engineering controls do this, unlike other controls that generally focus

on the employee exposed to the hazard.

The basic concept behind engineering controls is that, to the extent

feasible, the work environment and the job itself should be designed

to eliminate hazards or reduce exposure to hazards.

Page 98: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Occupational Health & Safety Controls

• Engineering Controls

http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/safetyhealth/comp3.html

http://www.afscme.org/publications/2903.cfm

Engineering controls can be simple in some cases.

They are based on the following principles:

• If feasible, design the facility, equipment, or process to remove the

hazard or substitute something that is not hazardous.

• If removal is not feasible, enclose the hazard to prevent exposure in

normal operations.

• Where complete enclosure is not feasible, establish

barriers or local ventilation to reduce exposure to the

hazard in normal operations

Page 99: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Occupational Health & Safety Controls

• Administrative Controls

http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/safetyhealth/comp3.html

They can mean measures aimed at reducing employee exposure to

hazards.

These measures include additional relief workers, exercise breaks and

rotation of workers.

These types of controls are normally used in conjunction with other

controls that more directly prevent or control exposure to the hazard.

Page 100: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Occupational Health & Safety Controls

• Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/safetyhealth/comp3.html

When exposure to hazards cannot be engineered completely out of

normal operations or maintenance work, and when safe work

practices and other forms of administrative controls cannot provide

sufficient additional protection, a supplementary method of control is

the use of protective clothing or equipment.

PPE may also be appropriate for controlling hazards while engineering

and work practice controls are being installed.

Page 101: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Occupational Health & Safety Controls

• Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/safetyhealth/comp3.html

http://www.ef-supplies.co.uk/safety_equipment.cfm

• Protection from Foot and Leg Injuries

• Protection from Eye and Face Injuries

• Protection from Hearing Loss

• Protection from Hand Injuries

• Protection from Body Injury

• Respiratory Protection

Page 102: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Occupational Health & Safety Controls

What H&S controls does the

organization have currently?

In this step research on

Do not make any

recommendation at this time.

Page 103: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.boces.com/site/Default.aspx?PageID=279

Page 104: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

III. Process

Characterization*

II. Getting

Started (Planning)*

IV. Occupational &

Environmental Risks

Assessment*

I. Top Management

Commitment

(Support)*

V. Occupational Health

& Safety Controls

Assessment*

VIII. Selecting and

Implementing

Options*

IX. Program

Evaluation*

VII. Technical &

Economic Evaluation*

X. Sustaining the

Program*

VI. Identifying

Opportunities*

Sustainability

Program

Page 105: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Determining the Cost of the Loss

Gathering accurate cost information is important for justifying investment in

Sustainability alternatives.

Three types of costs:

1. General ledger costs

2. Cost of the lost resources

3. Activity-based costs associated with

the management of the non-product loss

Page 106: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Determining the Cost of the Loss

1. General ledger costs

For example, if an organization generates solid waste, there may be a cost

for the disposal contractor in the general ledger. The chart of accounts

provides a vendor number and/or other code for this payment category.

Page 107: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Determining the Cost of the Loss

2. Cost of the lost resources

For example, when a part is spray painted, some of the paint does not end

up on the part. This overspray is probably captured on a paint filter in the

ventilation system. If 60% of the paint is incorporated on the part, 40% of

the paint is lost from the work step (i.e., non-product loss).

Page 108: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Determining the Cost of the Loss

3. Activity-based costs associated with the management of the non-product loss

You first must determine all the activities that must be performed for the non-

product losses from each work step at the lowest level in the process map.

Then you must estimate the cost associated with each of these activities.

The total activity-based cost associated with each loss is added to the total cost

of the loss associated with the general ledger cost and the cost of the lost

resources.

Page 109: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Identifying Opportunities

Information gathered in the process-mapping phase of the Sustainability

Program can be used to select opportunities on which to focus for problem

solving and decision-making.

Page 110: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Identifying Opportunities

If all the opportunities identified in the process maps were arranged in order

of their true cost to the organization, the 20% of the opportunities provide

approximately 80% of the cost benefits.

In most cases, you will find the 80/20 rule (also called the Pareto Principle)

to be a great guide for selecting opportunities.

Page 111: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Identifying Opportunities

Pareto analysis is a rank-ordering tool.

Focusing on wastes by volume or weight

may cause to overlook some important

wastes. Small volume wastes may be

responsible for the highest costs.

An example of this involves laptop computers

that become contaminated when used in

radiologically-controlled areas.

Page 112: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Green Zia Environmental Excellence Program. (n.d.). Auto Repair Shops: Guidance for improved environmental performance and pollution prevention in your auto repair business. New Mexico.

Example for an

auto body shop

Page 113: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Example for an auto body shop

Material /

Phase

Prep.

Vehicle &

Assess

Problem

Remove

Defective

Part

Clean

Repairable

Part

Replace Part Check Part

Prepare to

Return to

Customer

Annual

Cost

Solvent Use 0.00 2,650.00 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,650.00

Solvent

Sludge0.00 3,050.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,050.00

Filters 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,650.00 0.00 0.00 3,650.00

Clean Up

Materials850.00 0.00 850.00 0.00 850.00 300.00 2,850.00

Brake Dust 0.00 0.00 1,350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,350.00

Fugitive

Vapors206.00 206.00 210.00 206.00 206.00 206.00 1,240.00

Phases of the Process

Res

ou

rces

use

d, w

aste

s o

r

emis

sio

ns

Page 114: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

From $ 0.00 to $ 3,300.00 1

From $ 3,301.00 to $ 6,600.00 2

From $ 6,601.00 to $ 9,900.00 3

Considerations for costs:

Example for an auto body shop

Solvent

Use

Solvent

SludgeFilters

Clean Up

Materials

Brake

Dust

Fugitive

Vapors

Costs 8,650.00 8,050.00 3,650.00 2,850.00 1,350.00 1,240.00

Weighted Costs 3 3 2 1 1 1

Resources used, wastes or emissions

Page 115: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Criteria Weight Value Result Value Result Value Result Value Result Value Result Value Result

Worker exposure to

hazardous chemicals25% 3 0.75 3 0.75 1 0.25 3 0.75 3 0.75 3 0.75

Public exposure to

hazardous chemicals10% 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 2 0.20 2 0.20

Environmental pollution 15% 3 0.45 2 0.30 3 0.45 2 0.30 1 0.15 2 0.30

Costs 50% 3 1.50 3 1.50 2 1.00 1 0.50 1 0.50 1 0.50

Total

Sum

Total Weight 100% 2.80 2.65 1.80 1.65 1.60 1.75 12.25

Weighted Perc. (%) 22.86 21.63 14.69 13.47 13.06 14.29 100

Resources used, wastes or emissions

Solvent UseSolvent

SludgeFilters

Clean Up

MaterialsBrake Dust

Fugitive

Vapors

From $ 0.00 to $ 3,300.00 1

From $ 3,301.00 to $ 6,600.00 2

From $ 6,601.00 to $ 9,900.00 3

Considerations for costs:

Example for an auto body shop

Other Criteria to

be considered by

expert team

Page 116: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Criteria Weight Value Result Value Result Value Result Value Result Value Result Value Result

Worker exposure to

hazardous chemicals25% 3 0.75 3 0.75 1 0.25 3 0.75 3 0.75 3 0.75

Public exposure to

hazardous chemicals10% 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 2 0.20 2 0.20

Environmental pollution 15% 3 0.45 2 0.30 3 0.45 2 0.30 1 0.15 2 0.30

Costs 50% 3 1.50 3 1.50 2 1.00 1 0.50 1 0.50 1 0.50

Total

Sum

Total Weight 100% 2.80 2.65 1.80 1.65 1.60 1.75 12.25

Weighted Perc. (%) 22.86 21.63 14.69 13.47 13.06 14.29 100

Resources used, wastes or emissions

Solvent UseSolvent

SludgeFilters

Clean Up

MaterialsBrake Dust

Fugitive

Vapors

Considerations for the criteria:

From $ 0.00 to $ 3,300.00 1

From $ 3,301.00 to $ 6,600.00 2

From $ 6,601.00 to $ 9,900.00 3

1 Light implication

2 Moderate Implication

3 High Implication

Considerations for costs:

Example for an auto body shop

Weight of

all the

criteria

Page 117: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Criteria Weight Value Result Value Result Value Result Value Result Value Result Value Result

Worker exposure to

hazardous chemicals25% 3 0.75 3 0.75 1 0.25 3 0.75 3 0.75 3 0.75

Public exposure to

hazardous chemicals10% 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 2 0.20 2 0.20

Environmental pollution 15% 3 0.45 2 0.30 3 0.45 2 0.30 1 0.15 2 0.30

Costs 50% 3 1.50 3 1.50 2 1.00 1 0.50 1 0.50 1 0.50

Total

Sum

Total Weight 100% 2.80 2.65 1.80 1.65 1.60 1.75 12.25

Weighted Perc. (%) 22.86 21.63 14.69 13.47 13.06 14.29 100

Resources used, wastes or emissions

Solvent UseSolvent

SludgeFilters

Clean Up

MaterialsBrake Dust

Fugitive

Vapors

Considerations for the criteria:

From $ 0.00 to $ 3,300.00 1

From $ 3,301.00 to $ 6,600.00 2

From $ 6,601.00 to $ 9,900.00 3

1 Light implication

2 Moderate Implication

3 High Implication

Considerations for costs:

Example for an auto body shop

Values assigned by the expert team (for the Costs they were already assigned)

Page 118: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Considerations for the criteria:

From $ 0.00 to $ 3,300.00 1

From $ 3,301.00 to $ 6,600.00 2

From $ 6,601.00 to $ 9,900.00 3

1 Light implication

2 Moderate Implication

3 High Implication

Considerations for costs:

Example for an auto body shop

Now the Value and the Weight for each criteria are multiplied, having the Result.

Its sum is the Total Weight, obtaining from this the Weighted Percentage.

Criteria Weight Value Result Value Result Value Result Value Result Value Result Value Result

Worker exposure to

hazardous chemicals25% 3 0.75 3 0.75 1 0.25 3 0.75 3 0.75 3 0.75

Public exposure to

hazardous chemicals10% 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 2 0.20 2 0.20

Environmental pollution 15% 3 0.45 2 0.30 3 0.45 2 0.30 1 0.15 2 0.30

Costs 50% 3 1.50 3 1.50 2 1.00 1 0.50 1 0.50 1 0.50

Total

Sum

Total Weight 100% 2.80 2.65 1.80 1.65 1.60 1.75 12.25

Weighted Perc. (%) 22.86 21.63 14.69 13.47 13.06 14.29 100

Resources used, wastes or emissions

Solvent UseSolvent

SludgeFilters

Clean Up

MaterialsBrake Dust

Fugitive

Vapors

Page 119: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

22.86

21.63

14.69 14.2913.47 13.06

22.9

44.5

59.2

73.5

86.9

100.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

5

10

15

20

Solvent Use Solvent Sludge Filters Fugitive Vapors

Clean Up Materials

Brake Dust

Cu

mu

lati

ve W

eig

hte

d P

erc

en

tag

e (

%)

Resources used and lost

To

tal W

eig

hte

d P

erc

en

tag

e

Pareto of Weighted Percentage

Example for a painting step in auto body shop

Page 120: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Analyzing Root Causes

“Root cause” is the basic reason that a resource is being used or a process

loss is occurring. If this cause can be eliminated, the resource use or loss

would be prevented.

This approach is the very basis of prevention.

Page 121: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Analyzing Root Causes

Root cause analysis teaches organizations to look at all potential causes:

- Materials,

- Machines (technology),

- Methods (work practices), and

- People.

Page 122: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Analyzing Root Causes

The cause and effect diagram (also known as a fishbone diagram) provides

an effective tool for conducting root cause analysis. Studies have found

that this tool is the most widely used problem-solving tool in the world.

The 80/20 rule can be used to help focus on the most probable causes by

drawing circles around the 20% of the causes that may account for 80%

of the problem.

Page 123: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)
Page 124: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Analyzing Root Causes

Design a Cause and Effect Diagram for Solvent Use

in the General Auto Repair case

Page 125: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Analyzing Root Causes

Cause-Effect Diagram for Solvent Use in the General Auto Repair case

Solvent

Use or

Waste

MachinesMethods

Materials People

Page 126: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Green Zia Environmental Excellence Program. (n.d.). Auto Repair Shops: Guidance for improved environmental performance and pollution prevention in your auto repair business. New Mexico.

Example for an

auto body shop

Page 127: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Analyzing Root Causes

Cause-Effect Diagram for Solvent Use in the General Auto Repair case

Solvent

Use or

Waste

Page 128: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Analyzing Root Causes

Dear Consultant,

We run a small auto repair shop. Use of solvent is our most expensive

business issue. Solvents are highly regulated and we must comply with

lots of regulations from air quality to hazardous waste to health and

safety. Some auto repair shops have had to pay lots of money for clean

up of contaminated sites, which has put them out of business. These are

issues that we wish to take seriously.

Page 129: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Analyzing Root Causes

Our group did root cause analysis and we believe that our biggest problem

is our parts cleaning equipment that requires the use of volatile

solvents. Employees affect solvent use when cleaning parts from leaving

the lid open to not pre-cleaning the parts. There is also the issue of

making sure we are in compliance with regulations. However, as you

know, changing equipment can be expensive and would probably require

retraining of our employees.

Can you help us?

Signed,

General Auto Repair Co.

Page 130: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Analyzing Root Causes

Cause-Effect Diagram for Solvent Use in the General Auto Repair case

Solvent

Use or

Waste

Page 131: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Generating Alternative Solutions

The Systems Approach operates on the theory that “the only way to find a

good PP alternative is to have many PP alternatives.”

A good method for generating alternatives is “brainwriting,” a technique

similar to brainstorming, but tends to be less restrictive.

Brainwriting is a written form of brainstorming that uses forms like that

shown in next slide.

It takes advantage of the fact that many people are much more likely to

write down their ideas than say them.

Page 132: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Generating Alternative Solutions

Page 133: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Generating Alternative Solutions

This brainwriting technique allows resource people (i.e., those not on the

Sustainability team, vendors, or technical assistance personnel) to lend

their expertise in generating alternatives.

Page 134: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Generating Alternative Solutions

To help encourage Sustainability team members to “think outside the box,” it

is important to get each team member to express the “most outrageous

alternative that just might work.”

This gets everyone involved in

using a bit of creativity to

address the Sustainability

problem at hand.

Page 135: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Generating Alternative Solutions for an

Automated Car Wash

Page 136: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

U.S. EPA. (2001). An Organizational Guide to Pollution Prevention. EPA/625/R-01/003. Cincinnati, Ohio.

Generating Alternative Solutions for an Automated Car Wash

• Install a closed-loop (fully recycling) system.

• Fully automate the system to control drive

speed.

• Use water-saving nozzles.

• Wash less frequently.

• Put dehumidifier in room to collect water

vapor.

• Use high-pressure jet spray (rinse/clean in

one step).

• Redesign water application.

• Hand wash.

• Reduce evaporation by lowering room

temperature.

• Try to collect evaporated water.

• Use multistage washing process.

• Only use undercarriage spray in winter.

• Only wash vehicle once a week

• Dip vehicles in a tub-like device.

• Lower temperature of water to decrease

evaporation.

• Use drying apparatus so vehicles do not drip

dry.

• Use a switch to activate/deactivate each step.

• Close garage door before starting washing

process.

• Spit shine.

• Use a squeegee to scrape off excess water.

• Change soap application method.

• Use alternative to city water source.

• Use fewer absorbent sponges (less water

trapped).

• Use rental cars (rental agency will wash).

• Redesign collection of water.

• Drive through faster.

Page 137: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Remember the Prevention Hierarchy

Prevention

Reduction

Reusing

Recycling

Treatment

Disposal

Most Preferable

Least Preferable

Page 138: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.turi.org/Our_Work/Home_Community/Community_Grants/Library_of_Past_Projects/Union-Workers/Worker-Based_TUR_Curriculum/Project-Materials/TUR-Booklet-HTML-file

http://www.mass.gov/dep/toxics/approvals/turinstr.pdf

One way to generate alternatives is through

Toxics Use Reduction (TUR) approach

TUR is defined in the Massachusetts Toxic Use Reduction Act as:

In-plant changes in production processes or raw materials that

reduce, avoid, or eliminate the use of toxic or hazardous substances

or generation of hazardous byproducts per unit of product,

so as to reduce risks to the health of worker, consumers, or the

environment

without shifting risks between workers, consumers or parts of the

environment.

Page 139: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.turi.org/Our_Work/Home_Community/Community_Grants/Library_of_Past_Projects/Union-Workers/Worker-Based_TUR_Curriculum/Project-Materials/TUR-Booklet-HTML-file

http://www.mass.gov/dep/toxics/approvals/turinstr.pdf

Toxics Use Reduction (TUR)

TUR shall be achieved through any of

the following six techniques:

• Input Substitution

• Product Reformulation

• Production Unit Redesign or Modification

• Production Unit Modernization

• Improved Operation and Maintenance of Production Unit

Equipment

• Recycling, Reuse, or Extended Use of Toxics

Page 140: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.turi.org/Our_Work/Home_Community/Community_Grants/Library_of_Past_Projects/Union-Workers/Worker-Based_TUR_Curriculum/Project-Materials/TUR-Booklet-HTML-file

http://www.mass.gov/dep/toxics/approvals/turinstr.pdfb http://ecohomeresource.com/2010/05/switching-to-soy-ink.html

http://techcrunch.com/2008/04/24/going-green-if-you-have-to-use-a-printer-do-it-the-environmentally-friendly-way/

Toxics Use Reduction (TUR) Techniques

• Input Substitution

It is replacing a toxic or hazardous substance

or raw material used in a production unit with a

non-toxic or less toxic substance.

Examples:

• Aqueous cleaning instead of solvent cleaning

• Soy based inks instead of chemical inks

• Alkaline plating baths instead of cyanide

baths

Page 141: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.turi.org/Our_Work/Home_Community/Community_Grants/Library_of_Past_Projects/Union-Workers/Worker-Based_TUR_Curriculum/Project-Materials/TUR-Booklet-HTML-file

http://www.mass.gov/dep/toxics/approvals/turinstr.pdfb http://greensource.construction.com/products/2012/1201-Product.asp

Toxics Use Reduction (TUR) Techniques

It is substituting for an existing

end-product, an end-product

which is non-toxic or less toxic

upon use, release or disposal.

Examples:

• Latex based coatings instead

of oil based coatings

• Unbleached paper instead of

bleached paper

• Product Reformulation

Page 142: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.turi.org/Our_Work/Home_Community/Community_Grants/Library_of_Past_Projects/Union-Workers/Worker-Based_TUR_Curriculum/Project-Materials/TUR-Booklet-HTML-file

http://www.mass.gov/dep/toxics/approvals/turinstr.pdfb http://metaler.in/rnd

Toxics Use Reduction (TUR) Techniques

It is developing and using production units of

a different design than those currently used.

Examples:

• Ozonation instead of chlorine based

system for controlling corrosion

• Electrostatic powder paint spray instead

of solvent based paint

• Production Unit Redesign or Modification

Page 143: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.turi.org/Our_Work/Home_Community/Community_Grants/Library_of_Past_Projects/Union-Workers/Worker-Based_TUR_Curriculum/Project-Materials/TUR-Booklet-HTML-file

http://www.mass.gov/dep/toxics/approvals/turinstr.pdfb http://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C07/E2-14-02-03.pdf

Toxics Use Reduction (TUR) Techniques

It is upgrading or replacing existing production unit equipment and

methods with other equipment and methods based on the same

production unit.

Examples:

• Continuous closed system instead of batch process

• Countercurrent and reactive rinsing instead of single tank rinsing in

electroplating

• Production Unit Modernization

Page 144: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.turi.org/Our_Work/Home_Community/Community_Grants/Library_of_Past_Projects/Union-Workers/Worker-Based_TUR_Curriculum/Project-Materials/TUR-Booklet-HTML-file

http://www.mass.gov/dep/toxics/approvals/turinstr.pdfb http://www.chemistryland.com/CHM130FieldLab/Lab4/Lab4.html

Toxics Use Reduction (TUR) Techniques

It is modifying or adding to existing equipment or methods including, but

not limited to, such techniques as improved housekeeping practices,

system adjustments, product and process inspections, or production unit

control equipment or methods.

Examples:

• Improved Operation and Maintenance of Production Unit

Equipment

• Installation of Floating Roofs on Chemical

Storage Tanks (instead of no roofs)

• Strict inventory controls to prevent

expiration of chemicals

Page 145: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.turi.org/Our_Work/Home_Community/Community_Grants/Library_of_Past_Projects/Union-Workers/Worker-Based_TUR_Curriculum/Project-Materials/TUR-Booklet-HTML-file

http://www.mass.gov/dep/toxics/approvals/turinstr.pdfb http://www.rhodia.com/en/markets_and_products/product_ranges/Sulfuric_Acid_Regeneration_Process_Eco_Services.tcm

Toxics Use Reduction (TUR) Techniques

It is using equipment or methods which become an integral part of the

production unit of concern, including but not limited to filtration and other

closed loop methods.

Examples:

• Acid regeneration instead of disposal of acid

• Silver recycling unit instead of discharge of silver in wastewater

• Recycling, Reuse, or Extended Use of Toxics

Page 146: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.turi.org/Our_Work/Home_Community/Community_Grants/Library_of_Past_Projects/Union-Workers/Worker-Based_TUR_Curriculum/Project-Materials/TUR-Booklet-HTML-file

http://www.mass.gov/dep/toxics/approvals/turinstr.pdfb

What is NOT Toxics Use Reduction (TUR)?

TUR does not include any practice which promotes, or

requires, or which is:

• Shifting the toxic discharge from one medium to another

(air – water – soil);

• Recycling, unless it is integral to the production process;

• Treatment of toxic waste to make it less toxic or non-toxic; and

• Incineration.

Page 147: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.turi.org/Our_Work/Home_Community/Community_Grants/Library_of_Past_Projects/Union-Workers/Worker-Based_TUR_Curriculum/Project-Materials/TUR-Booklet-HTML-file

http://www.mass.gov/dep/toxics/approvals/turinstr.pdfb

Now you may potentially prevent, eliminate and/or reduce:

• Engineering Controls

• Administrative Controls

• Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

• Chemical Hazards

• Physical Hazards

• Ergonomic Hazards

• Biological Hazards

• Psychosocial Hazards

• Other Hazards

Through writing

proposals based on:

Page 148: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Selecting an Alternative for Implementation (bubble-up/ bubble-down)

Selecting a Sustainability alternative for implementation is facilitated with

decision-making tools.

The bubble-up/bubble-down tool in particular is an excellent means for

prioritizing and selecting an alternative to implement from a long list of

possibilities.

Page 149: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Selecting an Alternative for Implementation (bubble-up/ bubble-down)

Alternatives that “bubble up” to the top are typically easy to implement

and have a relatively low cost.

These alternatives may be characterized as the

low hanging fruit

or quick wins. Little or no capital is required to

implement these alternatives and work can

begin right away in most cases.

Page 150: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Generating Alternative Solutions

The General Auto Repair case

• Use non-toxic solvent to eliminate all

environmental problems.

• Train people to maintain filtration and

distillation systems better.

• Pre-clean parts with rags or brushes

• Start a “clean shop” program to train

employees to keep work areas clean to

prevent spills and waste.

• Use old solvent to pre-soak parts

• Begin an employee incentive program to

reward best operating practices for operating a

clean work area.

• Replace existing parts cleaner with new

equipment that uses non-solvent cleaning

solution.

• Don’t use solvent to clean shop floor.

• Pay employees small bonus for keeping good

environmental records including hazardous waste

and air quality records.

• Test solvent to see if we are replacing too soon.

• Create an employee problem-solving team to deal

with waste of all kinds on a regular basis.

• Convert to steam cleaning.

• Train workers on pollution prevention and ways to

reduce and reclaim spills.

• Provide incentives for employees who reduce

losses.

• Invest in better equipment.

• Keep lid on parts cleaner closed when not in use.

• Place parts cleaner nearer to work areas.

• Drain excess solvent from parts before removing

from parts cleaner.

Page 151: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Generating Alternative Solutions

The General Auto Repair case

• Use non-toxic solvent to eliminate all

environmental problems.

• Train people to maintain filtration and

distillation systems better.

• Pre-clean parts with rags or brushes

• Start a “clean shop” program to train

employees to keep work areas clean to

prevent spills and waste.

• Use old solvent to pre-soak parts

• Begin an employee incentive program to

reward best operating practices for operating

a clean work area.

• Replace existing parts cleaner with new

equipment that uses non-solvent cleaning

solution.

• Don’t use solvent to clean shop floor.

• Pay employees small bonus for keeping good

environmental records including hazardous waste

and air quality records.

• Test solvent to see if we are replacing too soon.

• Create an employee problem-solving team to deal

with waste of all kinds on a regular basis.

• Convert to steam cleaning.

• Train workers on pollution prevention and ways to

reduce and reclaim spills.

• Provide incentives for employees who reduce

losses.

• Invest in better equipment.

• Keep lid on parts cleaner closed when not in use.

• Place parts cleaner nearer to work areas.

• Drain excess solvent from parts before removing

from parts cleaner.

Page 152: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Selecting an Alternative for Implementation

(bubble-up/ bubble-down)

The General Auto Repair case

1. Replace existing parts cleaner with new equipment that uses non-solvent

cleaning solution.

2. Use non-toxic solvent to eliminate all environmental problems.

3. Pre-clean parts with rags or brushes

4. Use old solvent to pre-soak parts

5. Test solvent to see if we are replacing too soon.

6. Drain excess solvent from parts before removing from parts cleaner.

7. Keep lid on parts cleaner closed when not in use.

8. Place parts cleaner nearer to work areas.

9. Train people to maintain filtration and distillation systems better.

10. Begin an employee incentive program to reward best operating practices

Page 153: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Selecting an Alternative for Implementation

(bubble-up/ bubble-down)

The General Auto Repair case

11. Don’t use solvent to clean shop floor.

12. Pay employees small bonus for keeping good environmental records including

hazardous waste and air quality records.

13. Create an employee problem-solving team to deal with waste of all kinds on a

regular basis.

14. Convert to steam cleaning.

15. Train workers on pollution prevention and ways to reduce and reclaim spills.

16. Provide incentives for employees who reduce losses.

17. Invest in better equipment.

18. Start a “clean shop” program to train employees to keep work areas clean to

prevent spills and waste.

Page 154: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

III. Process

Characterization*

II. Getting

Started (Planning)*

IV. Occupational &

Environmental Risks

Assessment*

I. Top Management

Commitment

(Support)*

V. Occupational Health

& Safety Controls

Assessment*

VIII. Selecting and

Implementing

Options*

IX. Program

Evaluation*

VII. Technical &

Economic Evaluation*

X. Sustaining the

Program*

VI. Identifying

Opportunities*

Sustainability

Program

Page 155: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Example of the Cause of Problems and their possible solutions

For an electronic manufacturing industry

No. Cause of Problems Possible Solution ReferenceUsing WEIDMULLER for stripping wire clamp. For flexible

conductors.Sol. 01

Fixture wire stripper with direct line pressure 120 psi. Sol. 02

Hiring auditor to be assigned 100% of his/her time on the production

line.Sol. 03

Quote with other local development contract for box manufacturing. Sol. 04

Train stockists how to unpack the boxes in receipt warehouse to

avoid damage.Sol. 05

Preparation of quality plan to give to provider, specifying the

requirements for quality of the box.Sol. 06

3Housing wasted due to

illegible numbering.

Purchase number stamped device with date code and serial numbers

with following measures: 5/64 "x 7/8".Sol. 07

Cable cut outside the

specifications required

by the customer.1

2Box damaged as solid

waste. It cannot be

used for final product.

Page 156: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Technical Evaluation

Personnel that will be directly affected by implementing the project should

be consulted and included in the decision-making process.

For projects that involve a new technology and/or technique, a bench-scale

or pilot test may be required to asses technical feasibility.

(Freeman, 1995).

Page 157: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Technical Evaluation

Reference ToolsRequired

Personnel

Contract

with external

provider

Space

RequiredEfficiency Productivity

Reducing

ReworkQuality Total

Sol. 01 Pincer N/A N/A N/A 1 0 3 3 7

Sol. 02 Fixture N/A N/A Yes 2 1 3 3 9

Sol. 03 N/AAuditor for

Production LineN/A N/A 2 2 3 3 10

Sol. 04 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 1 3 6

Sol. 05 N/APersonnel from

Quality to trainN/A N/A 1 1 1 1 4

Sol. 06 N/APersonnel from

QualityN/A N/A 2 2 2 2 8

Sol. 07 Press N/A Yes Yes 1 0 3 3 7

Page 158: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Economical Evaluation

Once opportunities have been found to be technically feasible, the

economics of the project should be examined.

Any project that yields a cost saving… has potential for profitability. If there

are no initial cost involved, then a project can be considered economically

feasible if there is a cost savings.

Option such as better operating practices [BOP] may be the most practical

to implement first since they do not require an initial capital investment.

(Freeman, 1995).

Page 159: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

FIRST

Do financial analysis

= evaluating cash flow and profitability

implications of the Sustainability

options

THENPrioritize, based on financial

information & business priorities.

Improving MSME Performance through Cleaner Production. Module 5: The CP Process & Tools. Visit www.encapafrica.org.

Remember, even if a Sustainability option does not

require capital, it will require management attention—

this is in limited supply! Therefore, prioritization must

be strategic!

!

Page 160: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Improving MSME Performance through Cleaner Production. Module 5: The CP Process & Tools. Visit www.encapafrica.org.

Cash outflows

(COSTS; negative)

+

Cash inflows

(REVENUES & SAVINGS;

positive)

= NET CASH FLOW:

One-time Annual Other

Initial

invesment

cost

Operating

costs &

taxes

Working

capital

Equipment

salvage

value

Operating

revenues

& savingsWorking

capital

(Elements of cash flows)

Page 161: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Economical Evaluation

Reference

Investment

Needed

(USD)

Supplier Notes

Sol. 01 $122.68Weidumuller/

Global industrialCable stripping tool. Reduces rework and quality problems.

Sol. 02Not

NecessaryN/A

Fixture for cable stripping of specified measurements. Conduct by

the plant personnel.

Sol. 03Not

NecessaryN/A

Iit was decided that one of the current auditors could perform such

activity.

Sol. 04 $118.00 Universal pressSearch local provider to supply additional boxes, reducing rework

and quality plans.

Sol. 05Not

NecessaryN/A

It was decided that the area production supervisor could socialize

the right way to deal with the boxes.

Sol. 06 $400.00 Man powerHiring practitioner to perform quality plan and project lead

(drawing, dimensions, specifications and samples).

Sol. 07 $256.50

Mecco safety

utility marking

outfits

Stamping numbers 5/64" sharp utility face type, blank 3/8" x

5/64 "x 7/8" long.

Page 162: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Summary for Technical and Economical Evaluation

Reference Possible Solution TechnicalEconomical

(USD)Priority

Sol. 01Using WEIDMULLER pincers for stripping wire clamp. For

flexible conductors.7 $ 122.68 4

Sol. 02 Fixture wire stripper with direct line pressure 120 psi. 9 Not Necessary 2

Sol. 03Hiring auditor to be assigned 100% of his/her time on the

production line.10 Not Necessary 1

Sol. 04Ask for a budget with other local development contract for

box manufacturing.6 $ 118.00 7

Sol. 05Train stockists how to unpack the boxes in receipt

warehouse to avoid damage.4 Not Necessary 6

Sol. 06Preparation of quality plan to give to provider, specifying the

requirements for quality of the box.8 $ 400.00 5

Sol. 07Purchase number stamped device with date code and serial

numbers with following measures: 5/64 "x 7/8".7 $ 256.50 3

Evaluation

Page 163: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

TOXICS USE REDUCTION PLANNING AND PLAN UPDATE GUIDANCE

Developed in collaboration with: Office of Technical Assistance for Toxics Use Reduction.

Toxics Use Reduction Institute. Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs. Updated December 2009

http://www.sac.cmich.edu/Programs/general_aquatics.shtml

Production Unit: Floatation Device Production

Chemical: Methylene Chloride

Methylene chloride is used for cleaning molds and

other parts in the flotation devices production unit.

Several potential options were identified for the

reduction of methylene chloride within this process.

Another Example

Summary for Technical and Economical Evaluation

Page 164: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

http://www.chemicallabels.com/chemical-label/methylene-chloride-nfpa-label/sku-lb-1591-086.aspx

Another Example

Summary for Technical and Economical Evaluation

Fire Hazard:

1 – Flash Point above 200°F

Health Hazard:

2 – Hazardous

Instability:

0 – Stable

Specific Hazard:

N/A

Page 165: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

TOXICS USE REDUCTION PLANNING AND PLAN UPDATE GUIDANCE

Published in accordance with MGL 21I and 310 CMR 50.00.

Developed in collaboration with: Office of Technical Assistance for Toxics Use Reduction.

Toxics Use Reduction Institute. Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs. Updated December 2009

Summary for Technical and Economical Evaluation

Page 166: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

III. Process

Characterization*

II. Getting

Started (Planning)*

IV. Occupational &

Environmental Risks

Assessment*

I. Top Management

Commitment

(Support)*

V. Occupational Health

& Safety Controls

Assessment*

VIII. Selecting and

Implementing

Options*

IX. Program

Evaluation*

VII. Technical &

Economic Evaluation*

X. Sustaining the

Program*

VI. Identifying

Opportunities*

Sustainability

Program

Page 167: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Action Planning

Finally, a formal action plan should be prepared for every Sustainability

activity that is planned for each year of a Sustainability program.

In the rush to implement, Sustainability practitioners should not overlook the

need to formalize their action plans.

Each action plan should list the Sustainability alternative that will be

implemented and show the sequence of steps necessary to implement

the alternative.

Page 168: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Action Planning

The person responsible for ensuring that each step is completed should be

indicated in the action plan.

Performance of that step must have some recognizable goal that must be

reached.

A metric should be devised to measure the progress toward meeting that

goal and to provide a time frame for reaching the goal or completing that

step.

Finally, an indication of the resources required to reach the goal should be

included in the formal action plan.

Page 169: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Using the Systems Approach Tools

Action Planning

Page 170: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

Action Responsible person

Performance standard

Monitoring technique

Completion deadline

Resources needed

1.Investigate sources of equipment

Tom List of vendors

Discuss list with Steve the owner

Jan 15 Team of Tom, Steve and Harry

2. Bring in equipment for review

Tom Approved list of vendors by Steve

Steve allocates time for employees

Feb 1 Shop employees

3. Employees try out equipment and write up results

Harry How good does the equipment clean parts

Time to clean parts

March 1 Shop employees

4. Have team review results and select vendor

Harry Compare against existing equipment

Time, quality and cost

April 15 Team of Tom, Steve and Harry

5. Purchase equipment

Steve Delivery schedule

Steve allocates funds

April 30 Capital funds

6. Train employees on how to use new equipment

Harry Time and quality of cleaning parts

Costs of new equipment versus old

June1 Employees time

Action Planning

The General Auto Repair case

Page 171: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

III. Process

Characterization*

II. Getting

Started (Planning)*

IV. Occupational &

Environmental Risks

Assessment*

I. Top Management

Commitment

(Support)*

V. Occupational Health

& Safety Controls

Assessment*

VIII. Selecting and

Implementing

Options*

IX. Program

Evaluation*

VII. Technical &

Economic Evaluation*

X. Sustaining the

Program*

VI. Identifying

Opportunities*

Sustainability

Program

Page 172: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

The program should be continuously evaluated and updated to improve

overall effectiveness.

One way of measuring progress is quantitative. For example, waste that

have changed (reduced) in quantity or in hazard level.

When evaluating the elements of the program, it is important to identify

those strategies and techniques which have been very successful,

marginally successful, or have failed; and why.

(Freeman, 1995).

Program Evaluation

Page 173: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

III. Process

Characterization*

II. Getting

Started (Planning)*

IV. Occupational &

Environmental Risks

Assessment*

I. Top Management

Commitment

(Support)*

V. Occupational Health

& Safety Controls

Assessment*

VIII. Selecting and

Implementing

Options*

IX. Program

Evaluation*

VII. Technical &

Economic Evaluation*

X. Sustaining the

Program*

VI. Identifying

Opportunities*

Sustainability

Program

Page 174: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

- Emphasize economic benefits

- Rotate Teams

- Provide refresher training

- Publicize success stories

(Freeman, 1995).

Sustaining the Program

The following activities can be used as a way to provide a proper

follow up for the Sustainability Program and to continue

encouraging people to participate :

Page 175: 05 a Sb Prog Imp - Full (1)

III. Process

Characterization*

II. Getting

Started (Planning)*

IV. Occupational &

Environmental Risks

Assessment*

I. Top Management

Commitment

(Support)*

V. Occupational Health

& Safety Controls

Assessment*

VIII. Selecting and

Implementing

Options*

IX. Program

Evaluation*

VII. Technical &

Economic Evaluation*

X. Sustaining the

Program*

VI. Identifying

Opportunities*

Sustainability

Program