03 ppt slides

33
Chapter 3 Explaining Theories of Cognition and Intrapersonal Communication

description

 

Transcript of 03 ppt slides

Page 1: 03 ppt slides

Chapter 3

Explaining Theories of Cognition and Intrapersonal Communication

Page 2: 03 ppt slides

BlackBoard Follow Up

Introductions

Who is Howard Gardner

Changing Minds

Page 3: 03 ppt slides

Brian Solis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3hi0V13oag

Social listening

Talking to you and through you

Investing in social capital

Page 4: 03 ppt slides

Cognitive Process

Communication has early roots in psychology

Cognitive scholars are concerned with the mental processes that are used to process stimuli and generate particular effects

Contrasts behavioral view that focuses solely on external causes (or stimuli) and behavioral effects

Page 5: 03 ppt slides

Cognitive/Intrapersonal Theories

Message Design Logics

Premise: Message Design Logics predicts that people strategically design messages sent to others

Page 6: 03 ppt slides

Message Design Logics

Three types of Design

Expressive design

Conventional design

Rhetorical design

Page 7: 03 ppt slides

Message Design Logics

Problems interacting with different MDL styles

When individuals share the same MDL: they are more likely to acknowledge

communication problems

When individuals have different MDLs: they are more likely to blame their problems

on the other’s bad intentions, mistaken beliefs, or undesirable personality characteristics

Page 8: 03 ppt slides

Cognitive/Intrapersonal Theories

Message Design Logics

Communication Accommodation Theory

Uncertainty Reduction Theory

Expectancy Violations Theory

Page 9: 03 ppt slides

Communication Accommodation Theory Giles & Coupland

Premise: when individuals interact with others, they will:

accommodate their speech and language patterns

by matching their partner’s speech

by differentiating their speech and language use

Page 10: 03 ppt slides

Communication Accommodation Theory Individuals belong to a wide variety of social

groups

These groups shape each person’s collective identity

In-groups: social affiliations to which an individual feels he or she belongs

Out-groups: social affiliations to which a person feels that he or she does not belong

Language, speech, and nonverbal messages all communicate one’s in-group and out-group status

Page 11: 03 ppt slides

What In-groups are you part of?

Social affiliations to which an individual feels he or she belongs

What language, speech, and nonverbal messages are you aware of?

Page 12: 03 ppt slides

What out-groups are you aware of?

Social affiliations to which a person feels that he or she does not belong

What language, speech, and nonverbal messages did you observe?

Page 13: 03 ppt slides

Communication Accommodation Theory

Page 14: 03 ppt slides

Communication Accommodation Theory Individuals adjust their speech and

conversational patterns either to assimilate with or to deviate from others

Convergence: altering your speech and behavior so that it matches that of your conversational partner

Divergence: rather than match your partner’s communication patterns, you seek to make your speech different

Page 15: 03 ppt slides

Communication Accommodation Theory Predictions

When a person wants to be viewed as part of an in-group, s/he will accommodate by convergence

When a persona wants to be viewed as distinct from a certain group, s/he will alter your speech through divergence

In addition to expressing disagreement or rejection of a speaker, divergence also illustrates one’s cultural identity or differences in one’s status.

Page 16: 03 ppt slides

Communication Accommodation Theory Accommodation is not always appropriate or

effective

When in doubt, individuals rely on social norms to inform their decision to accommodate (or not)

Page 17: 03 ppt slides

Scenario #1

Page 18: 03 ppt slides

Convergence

Pros Cons

Page 19: 03 ppt slides

Divergence

Pros Cons

Page 20: 03 ppt slides

Communication Accommodation Theory

Positive Effects Increased attraction,

social approval, and increased persuasion

Negative Effects Incorrect stereotypes of

out-group, perceived condescension, loss of personal identity

Page 21: 03 ppt slides

Communication Accommodation Theory

Positive Effects Protects cultural

identity, asserts power differences, and increased sympathy

Negative Effects Perceived disdain for out-

group, perceived lack of effort, and increased psychological distance

Page 22: 03 ppt slides

Uncertainty Reduction

Theory

Page 23: 03 ppt slides

Uncertainty Reduction Theory

Berger & Calabrese

Premise: URT explains and predict when, why, and how individuals use communication to minimize their doubts when interacting with others

Page 24: 03 ppt slides

Uncertainty Reduction Theory

URT functions based on three assumptions

Primary goal of communication is to minimize uncertainties that we have about the world

Individuals experience uncertainty regularly; the experience of uncertainty is unpleasant

Communication is the primary vehicle for reducing uncertainty

Page 25: 03 ppt slides

Uncertainty Reduction Theory

Reducing uncertainty

3 antecedent conditions: influence whether we have the motivation to reduce uncertainty

Anticipation of future interaction

Incentive value

Deviance

Page 26: 03 ppt slides

Uncertainty Reduction Theory

Two types of uncertainty

Behavioral uncertainty

Cognitive uncertainty

Page 27: 03 ppt slides

Uncertainty Reduction Theory

8 Axioms Explaining the Uncertainty Reduction Process

Axiom 1: Verbal communication

Axiom 2: Welcoming nonverbal communication

Axiom 3: Information-seeking behaviors

Axiom 4: Intimacy

Axiom 5: Reciprocal communication strategies

Axiom 6: Perceived similarities

Axiom 7: Liking

Axiom 8: Shared communication networks

Page 28: 03 ppt slides

Uncertainty Reduction Theory

Berger (1995, 1997) noted that much of social interaction is goal driven; we communicate for a reason and we create plans to guide interaction

Uncertainty reduction strategies

Passive strategy

Active strategy

Interactive strategy

Page 29: 03 ppt slides

Expectancy Violations

Theory

Page 30: 03 ppt slides

Expectancy Violations Theory

Burgoon

Premise: explains the meanings that people attribute to the violation of their personal space and predicts their response to such infringements

Assumptions

EVT builds on numerous axioms

Primary assumption: humans have competing needs for personal space and for affiliation

Page 31: 03 ppt slides

Expectancy Violations Theory

EVT makes predictions as to how individuals will react to a given violation

Reciprocate: match someone’s behavior

Compensate: counteract by doing the opposite of your partner’s behavior

Page 32: 03 ppt slides

Expectancy Violations Theory

Core Concepts

Expectancy Context of the behavior Relationship with the person in question Communicator’s characteristics

Page 33: 03 ppt slides

BlackBoard Questions

What cultural differences have you observed related to any single theory we discussed?