02 tsl from tender until rfc by pablo arecco
-
Upload
delft-infrastructures-mobility-initiative -
Category
Design
-
view
83 -
download
0
Transcript of 02 tsl from tender until rfc by pablo arecco
1
Challenge the future
Third Set of Locks: From Conceptual
Design until RFC Design Pablo Arecco
PIANC YP-Com Chairman / MWH Global
2
Challenge the future
From 2007, the story keeps going…
• Prequalification period: 4 months.
• Tender Design: 14 months from 2008.
Design
& Build
US$ 3,221,631,384.00
Best technical proposal
3
Challenge the future
Design of the Third Set of Locks
MWH - Chicago
IV-Infra - Rotterdam Netherlands
Panama
MWH - Buenos Aires
Tetratech - Bellevue
Sembenelli - Milano, Italy
CICP Design Integration Office and Design Centers
Design phases: Preliminary, Intermediate, Final, Release for Construction,
Optimization & As Built (Engineering services during construction).
4
Challenge the future
Design of the Third Set of Locks
• Hydraulic
• Geotechnical
• Seismic
• Lock Heads & Rolling Gates / Culvert Valves
• Mechanical / Electrical / I & C
• Buildings (by Others)
• Site Development & Infrastructure
Engineering Discipline Interfaces
5
Challenge the future
Components of each new Lock Complex Three Lock Chambers and four Lock Heads in each site
Upper Chamber
Middle Chamber
Lower Chamber
Lock Head 4
6
Challenge the future
7
Challenge the future
8
Challenge the future
9
Challenge the future
10
Challenge the future
11
Challenge the future
12
Challenge the future
13
Challenge the future
14
Challenge the future
15
Challenge the future
16
Challenge the future
17
Challenge the future
Numerical & Physical models
18
Challenge the future
Numerical & Physical models
19
Challenge the future
Atlantic & Pacific Locks
• Use of existing 1939 excavations for New Locks
• Geology (Sandstone vs. Basalt)
• Excavation, slope protection & rock restitution
• Availability of concrete aggregate at Atlantic
• Seismic criteria / Fault zones
• Lock floor slabs
• Borinquen dams / Approach channels
Major differences
20
Challenge the future
Lock Head
Lock Walls with central connection
Typical Lock Walls
Lock chamber components For each type a structural model was identified for the design
23 monoliths per side per chamber
7 types of structural Lock Walls
Several loads combinations
Crossunder
Chamber Conduit
21
Challenge the future
Lock Chamber monolith walls Pacific & Atlantic Lock Wall monoliths are different
August 2012
Final concrete volumes: Lock walls ≈ 2.100.000 m3
Lock heads ≈ 1.200.000 m3
Lock Wall Typical
Monolith
up to 350
22
Challenge the future
Finite Elements Models with Abaqus®
23
Challenge the future
Rock Foundation
(Gatún Rock)
Rolling gates (Steel)
Backfill (Gatún Rockfill)
Lock Walls (Concrete)
Lock Walls (Concrete) Lock Head
Large Recess (Concrete)
Lock Head Small
Recess (Concrete)
Lock Head Slab
(Concrete)
Finite Elements Models with Abaqus®
24
Challenge the future
Finite Elements Models with Abaqus®
25
Challenge the future
• No service disruption
• Reparable damage
• Structure essentially elastic
Level I
475 years
• No collapse
• Reparable damage
• Limited non linear behavior
Level II
950 years
Lock structures - Seismic criteria Earthquake level & performance criteria
ATL 0,33g
PAC 0,52g
ATL 0,42g
PAC 0,72g
26
Challenge the future
Final design quantities reduction
maintaining same Design Req.:
• Concrete and excavation of over
10% compared to tender
• Reduction in reinforcement of 40%
(around 17 Eiffel Towers)
Concrete reinforcement Weight 190,000 tonnes or 26 Eiffel Towers
27
Challenge the future
28
Challenge the future
Design Facts & Figures Total for Atlantic and Pacific
• The MWH-led team peaked at over Equivalent 300 Full Time Staff
working in 6 design offices on 3 continents.
• 9,500 Design Drawings (Atlantic & Pacific Total)
• 13,000 Concrete Lift Shop Drawings Reviewed
• 26,000 Reinforcement Shop Drawings Reviewed
• 50 Quality Audits (33 Internal, 17 External – GUPC, ACP)
• Design 95% Complete, 88.5% Design Packages Submitted
29
Challenge the future
THIS IS THE
EFFORT OF A
HUGE TEAM!