02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

13
© 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Jeff Smith Manager, Power System Studies Dr. Matthew Rylander Technical Leader, Power System Studies Implementing Hosting Capacity Methods into Existing Planning Tools PV Systems Symposium PV Grid Integration Workshop Agenda Tuesday, May 10, 2016

Transcript of 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

Page 1: 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

© 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Jeff Smith Manager, Power System Studies

Dr. Matthew Rylander

Technical Leader, Power System Studies

Implementing Hosting Capacity Methods into

Existing Planning Tools

PV Systems Symposium

PV Grid Integration Workshop Agenda

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

Page 2: 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

2 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

What is Hosting Capacity and Why is it So Important?

Definition: – Hosting Capacity is the amount

of DER that can be accommodated without adversely impacting power quality or reliability under current configurations and without requiring infrastructure upgrades.

Hosting Capacity is – Location dependent – Feeder-specific – Time-varying

Hosting capacity considers DER interconnection without allowing – Voltage/flicker violations, – Protection mis-operation – Thermal overloads – Decreased safety/reliability/power quality

Hosting Capacity can be used to inform utility interconnection

processes and to support DG developer understanding of more

favorable locations for interconnection

Develop original method

Utility application

Streamlined method

development

Utility application

Vendor implementation

2010 2011 2014 2015 2016/17

Evolution of Hosting Capacity Methodology

Page 3: 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

3 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Evolution of Hosting Capacity Methods Detailed hosting capacity methods first used to quantify

– How much DER can be accommodated – Where can DER be accommodated – What distribution impacts occur

Industry-wide application – Over 6 million unique DER deployment

scenarios evaluated across >30 feeders and > 12 utilities

Lessons learned – Location matters – No two feeders are alike – feeder

clustering not sufficient – Rules-of-thumb aren’t effective

(DER as % of load for example) – Detailed analysis not easily replicable

across large number of feeders New methods can be developed based

learnings to “streamline” the analysis

Utility Participation in EPRI Hosting Capacity EvaluationsMain map: © 2012 Microsoft Corporation. Imagery © Microsoft – available exclusively by DigitalGlobe (Bing Maps Terms of Use: http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9710837). Inset map: Map data © 2012 Google

Distribution FeederPV Impact Heat Map

PV

Impa

ct

Develop original method

Utility application

Streamlined method

development

Utility application

Vendor implementation

2010 2011 2014 2015 2016/17

1.035

1.04

1.045

1.05

1.055

1.06

1.065

1.07

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

A B C

Wor

st-C

ase

Res

ult f

or E

ach

Uni

que

DE

R D

eplo

ymen

t

Increasing penetration (MW)

Threshold of violation

A – All penetrations in this region are

acceptable, regardless of location

B – Some penetrations in this region are

acceptable, site specific

C – No penetrations in this region are

acceptable, regardless of location

Page 4: 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

4 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Large “Scale” of Distribution System Creates Challenges for Distribution Planners

• Typical utility responsible for 100’s to 1000’s of distribution feeders

• Each feeder uniquely designed and operated to reliably serve all customers

• Methods needed that can be applied across entire distribution service territory

• Capture unique feeder-specific responsesGranular

• As distribution feeders changeRepeatable

• System-wide assessmentScalable

• Clear and open methods for analysisTransparent

• Validated techniquesProven

• Utilize readily available utility data and toolsAvailable

EPRI’s Streamlined Hosting Capacity Method

Page 5: 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

5 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Streamlined Hosting Capacity Method – What is it? The Input Utilizes existing planning tools

– CYME, Milsoft, Synergi

The Method Developed from years of detailed

hosting capacity analysis

Validated and open methods

The Output Effectively and efficiently analyzes each

and every feeder in system

Considers DER size and location – Small distributed and large

centralized DER

Considers DER technology and impacts – PV, wind, storage, etc – Voltage, thermal, protection

Input Method Output

case by case look needed

Location √no impact

Location XPotential riskDetails on Streamlined Method: EPRI Report 3002003278, 2015

Develop original method

Utility application

Streamlining method

development

Streamlined method

application

Vendor implementation

2010 2011 2014 2015 2016/17

Page 6: 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

6 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Key Aspects of Hosting Capacity Method Power System Criteria and DER

Power System Criteria

Thermal

Substation transformer

Primary conductor

Service Transformer

Secondary Conductor

Power Quality/Voltage

Sudden (fast) voltage change

Steady-state voltage

Voltage regulator impact

Load tap changer impact

Protection

Relay reduction of reach

Sympathetic tripping

Element fault current

Reverse power flow

Reliability/Safety

Unintentional islanding

Operational flexibility

Substation

Distributed 1 Distributed N

Substation

Centralized 1 Centralized N

DER Size and Location Distributed and Centralized

Unique DER Technology

Page 7: 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

7 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

What does the Streamlined Method tell us?

– Where issues occur with DER and at what penetration level (better or worse locations)

– How much aggregate DER a feeder can host

– When the system changes, how hosting capacity impacted

– The aggregate level of DER that can be accommodated at the substation level

– The amount of DER that can be accommodated across the entire system

– The range of issues for accommodating DER across the entire distribution system

=

Feeder Level

Feeder Level Feeder Level

Substation Level

Page 8: 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

8 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Utility Applications

Utility Participants to date – TVA – Southern Company – Salt River Project – XCEL Energy – SCE – Central Hudson – CFE – HydroOne – ESKOM

>3500 feeders analyzed thus far Software tools to date

– CYME – Synergi – Milsoft

Develop original method

Utility application

Streamlined method

development

Utility application

Vendor implementation

2010 2011 2014 2015 2016/17

Screening new DER

Mapping of DER impacts on distribution

Planning for DER

Distribution system-wide evaluation of DER

Evaluation of distribution-connected DER fro bulk system analysis

Page 9: 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

9 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Substation Marker *Hosting Capacity Sample Results

System Hosting Capacity (~ 300 distribution feeders)

Substation-level Hosting Capacity

Feeder-level Hosting Capacity

*Initial analysis results from TVA/ EPB study, results not finalized

lower

higher

Page 10: 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

10 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Implementing the Hosting Capacity Method into Existing Distribution Planning Tools Distribution Resource Integration and

Value Estimation (DRIVE) tool Rather than develop a new software

tool, EPRI has focused efforts on implementation into existing planning tools Benefits of using existing planning

tools – Necessary data resides in existing

planning tools – Does not require “translating” data to

other software platforms (requiring updating other software databases)

– Can be used as part of toolset within planning tools for multiple purposes Screening Planning Cost-benefit analysis

Incorporating EPRI’s Hosting Capacity Method into existing utility

planning tool

EPRI’s DRIVE Tool

Existing Planning Tools

(CYME, Milsoft, Synergi, PowerFactory,

etc.)

Develop original method

Utility application

Streamlined method

development

Utility application

Vendor implementation

/

Page 11: 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

11 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Summary

Hosting capacity analysis captures necessary impacts of DER Many applications for hosting

capacity (including screening) Hosting capacity can be

determined within existing planning tools Based upon rigorous analysis,

EPRI has developed a streamlined hosting capacity method that is compatible with existing planning tools EPRI is currently working with

software vendors for incorporation into distribution planning tools

Development Implementation Delivery

OPENDSS2014-2015

CYME2016

Synergi, Milsoft, PowerFactory, etc

2016/2017

Page 12: 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

12 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

References

Detailed Hosting Capacity Method Impact of High-Penetration PV on Distribution System Performance: Example Cases

and Analysis Approach. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2011. 1021982

Analysis of High-Penetration Solar PV Impacts for Distribution Planning: Stochastic and Time-Series Methods for Determining Feeder Hosting Capacity. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2012. 1026640

Rylander, M., Smith, J., “Comprehensive Approach for Determining Distribution Network Hosting Capacity for Solar PV”, 2nd International Workshop on Integration of Solar Power Into Power Systems, Lisbon, Portugal, Nov 2012.

Rylander, M., Smith, J., "Stochastic Approach for Distribution Planning with Distributed Energy Resources", 2012 CIGRE Grid of the Future Symposium, Kansas City, MO, 2012

Rylander, M., Smith, J., "Comprehensive Approach for Determining Distribution Network Hosting Capacity for Solar PV", 2nd International Workshop on Integration of Solar Power Into Distribution Systems, 12-13 November, 2012

Distributed Photovoltaic Feeder Analysis: Preliminary Findings from Hosting Capacity Analysis of 18 Distribution Feeders. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2013. 3002001245.

Alternatives to the 15% Rule: Modeling and Hosting Capacity Analysis of 16 Feeders. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2015. 3002005812.

Streamlined Hosting Capacity Method Integration of Hosting Capacity Analysis into Distribution Planning Tools. EPRI, Palo

Alto, CA: 2016. 3002005793

A New Method for Characterizing Distribution System Hosting Capacity for Distributed Energy Resources: A Streamlined Approach for Solar Photovoltaics. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2014. 3002003278.

Rylander, M., Smith, J., Sunderman, W., “Streamlined Method For Determining Distribution System Hosting Capacity”, 23rd International Conference on Electricity Distribution, CIRED, Lyon, France, 2015

Rylander, M., Smith, J., Sunderman, W., “Streamlined Method For Determining Distribution System Hosting Capacity”, Rural Electric Power Conference, Asheville, NC, 2015 (accepted for IAS Transactions)

Distribution Feeder Hosting Capacity: What Matters When Planning for DER?. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2015. 3002004777

Smith, J., Rylander, M., Rogers, L., Dugan, R., “It’s All in the Plans: Maximizing the Benefits and Minimizing the Impacts of DERs in an Integrated Grid”, Power and Energy Magazine, March/April 2015.

Public White Paper Integration of Hosting Capacity Analysis into Distribution

Planning Tools. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2016. 3002005793

Page 13: 02 smith epri_smith_hosting_capacity

13 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Questions…

Jeff Smith, [email protected] Dr. Matthew Rylander, [email protected]