01 The FDA's cozy little relationship
-
Upload
sinisa-julijan -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
description
Transcript of 01 The FDA's cozy little relationship
Relationwhich phaffectingis over, t
A web seto go to tAdminist
The FDAthose whpharmac
Among tregulatoin recruitThe webof the datraining a
The FDAoutside crecruitingon the Fsame bu
The cha2002) thCongresOSHA dagenciesthe indus
Villforth providescompani
A few ot
The FDACEO of tmanufacconsultinweb sitefor the gcommunin 2001 wdrug dev
James SConsultaaccordinexecutivhas descdevices,
ships betweeharmaceuticag their industrthey go back
earch for “FDthe trouble. Ttration Alumn
AAA’s web siho have suppceutical indus
the FDAAA'sry issues facting alumni w
b site also saay facing FDAand outreach
AAA’s revenucontributionsg alumni, theDA’s site. Th
uilding as FD
irman of the at in looking
ss, among oto not.” Perhas and may nostry they reg
is on the boas regulatory cies.
her example
AAA’s treasuthe Food andcturers and sng firms, ass, are quite sieneration of
nities.” Halpewas appointevelopment.
S. Benson, a ants, “a leading to the presve vice presidcribed as “a t diagnostic p
en the FDA aal executivesry and some
k to higher-pa
DA revolving The revolvingni Associatio
ite says the gported the costry lobbyists
s goals are tocing FDA, edwith specializays that the FA and suppoh opportunitie
ue “is primars go, “suppore home pagehe FDAAA’s
DA headquart
FDAAA, Johinto the ideahers, have aaps it didn’t oot have thouulate.
ard of directocompliance “
es:
urer and chaid Drug Law I
suppliers of mociations, animilar to thosideas and d
erin was formed to the boa
member of ting consultinss release andent for techntrade associ
products, and
and the phars go to work ftimes even taying jobs in
door” turns g door was f
on (FDAAA).
group is “a nonsumer prots and p.r. pe
o “enable formucate the pu
zed expertiseFDAAA’s “corort the Agences.”
ily derived frrt from other e has industrylogo incorpoters in Maryla
hn C. Villfortha of an alumnactive alumni occur to themght it approp
ors of Vasogelearning solu
rman of the fInstitute (FD
medicines . . nd others.” Inse of the FDAiscussion of
merly vice preard of directo
the FDAAA bg and contrannouncing hinology and ration that repd medical inf
rmaceutical ifor the FDA,their own form the industry
up numerouformalized in
non-profit, notection missiople are wel
mer colleaguublic about the and institutre mission iscy’s public he
rom member persons andy job posting
orates the FDand. Its mott
h, writes in thni group, “we associations
m that the latpriate for thei
en, which mautions.” He h
finance comLI). FDLI’s w. medical de
nterestingly, tAAA: “providlaw and pub
esident of tecors of Pharm
board of direact research is appointmeregulatory affpresents moformation sys
ndustry have making regumer compan
y.
s examples, 2001, with t
n-lobbying oion of the U.Sl represented
ues to stay che vital work ional knowle
s to help alumealth mission
dues and oud institutions gs—and the sDA’s logo. In to is “Serving
he organizatie discovereds; other agentter three, likeir officials to
akes heart dhas also been
mittee, Jeromweb site saysevices, food athe stated going high qua
blic policy for chnology for Quest, which
ctors, is alsoorganization
ent to that cofairs at Advare than 800 stems.” The
e led to a “reulatory decisies. When th
but it’s no lohe creation o
organization dS. FDA.” Oddd on its boar
urrent on maof the FDA .
edge during cmni stay in ton through exp
utside contribis welcome.”site can be afact, the FDA
g Those Who
on’s first newthat NIH, SS
ncies such ase the FDA, abe fraternizin
rugs, and Edn on the boa
me A. Halpers its “500+ meand cosmeticoals of the FDlity educationits legal, polCIBA-GEIGYh provides so
o on the boarn for the medmpany’s boaMed (formermanufacturepress releas
evolving doorsions on mattheir time at th
onger necessof the Food a
dedicated to dly, howeverrd of director
ajor scientific . . ,” and “as
critical situatiouch with thepertise-shari
butions.” As ” To facilitate
accessed froAAA’s office o Have Serve
wsletter (NovSA, HCFA ans NRC, EPA
are regulatoryng with emp
duNeering, wrds of other
rin, is presidembers comcs . . . law firDLI, accordinn and a neutlicy and reguY (now Novaoftware to ac
rd of Medicadical device inard. He was rly HIMA), whers of medicase said Bens
r,” in ters he FDA
sary even and Drug
serving r, s.
c and ssist FDA ons.”
e issues ng,
far as e m a link is in the
ed.”
vember nd
A and y loyees of
which medical
ent and mprise rms, ng to its tral forum ulatory artis) and ccelerate
l Device ndustry,” formerly hich he al on was
the “lead strategist for the association’s regulatory agenda.” FDAAA board member Elizabeth Jacobson is executive vice president of AdvaMed.
Wayne L. Pines, another FDAAA board member and chairman of the activities committee, is “president of regulatory services and health care” for APCO, a “global communication consultancy”—a p.r. firm. Pines “provides strategic counsel to clients facing crises or media, legislative, regulatory or marketing problems.” Board member Gerald F. Meyer is a senior consultant at AAC Consulting Group, which, its web site says, “provides a full range of support and compliance assistance. . . . offers a team of former high-level FDA officials and industry experts.”
For those who might be suspicious of all this togetherness between the FDA and employees and board members of the industries it ostensibly regulates, the FDAAA has a code of ethics. Unfortunately, its lofty-sounding but carefully worded constructions do not inspire confidence. It says, for example, that members aren’t allowed to “influence FDA policy or action in a manner other than that which [sic] any member of the general public is legally entitled.”
Of course, if you have personal access in a social setting to FDA regulatory officials who approve your product or could hire you or whom you might hire, you’re already in a more favorable position than “any member of the general public”—especially the small alternative businesses the FDA feels it has a mandate to persecute.
Members aren’t allowed to lobby, either—but they don’t need to lobby. They represent a community of interests. All they need to do is network—for example, at a wine tasting at the Bretton Woods Conference Center in October 2004—and they’re already way ahead. Whatever happened to the idea of avoiding even the appearance of impropriety?
Violations of the ethical code are reviewed by . . . the board of directors. If a violation is corroborated, the executive committee “may” impose sanctions, including warning, suspension, and expulsion. So the worst that can happen for an attempt to influence an FDA employee that’s so flagrant it can’t be ignored is expulsion from the organization.
Izvor: http://www.goodhealthinfo.net/cancer/fda_cozy_relationship.htm