003 what next post presentation

what nextpost ‘pecha’

19 11 12

focus

• 3 weeks• Developing what your work is, could or should

be.

• To Dec 3nd

• Note - this date is past the hand in – but you are allowed to make work for yourself and not just for the assessment points

focus

• This is time to focus what it is that you do, what you are interested in, to hone skills and develop techniques and processes.

• It is expected that you will make a body of focused work for yourself.

• Become an expert.

assessing work

diary• Deadline for hand in -• Time - 3.00 – 4.00 / 23 11 12• Location – SG13• Feedback published – 6th Dec • Feedback – week of 3rd Dec as part of

individual tutorials on 6th Dec - 7th Dec • Pick up work – after feedback

feedback =• research report - annotated feedback • Strengths – areas for improvement

• studio work• Strengths – areas for improvement

what• Learning agreement

• Body of studio work • Reflective journal

• Draft Research report

how

• Do we assess?

• What do we look for?

Learning Outcome How you will be assessed:

LO1: Demonstrate consistent knowledge and understanding of your subject area, making detailed reference to current and emerging practice

We will be looking for breadth and depth in your references to contemporary practices in textiles and we will be looking at the scope and context of your project in relation to textile design practice, particularly through your Learning Agreement and draft Research Report.


LO2: To identify issues or questions relevant to your subject and adopt established research methods, clear analysis and appropriate written and visual communication through a draft research report.

We will be looking for a focused approach to ideas generation and evidence of how selection and development has been made. We will be looking for indications that you have identified research methods appropriate to your project, particularly through your supporting research for your studio work and draft Research Report.


LO3: Evidence a clear understanding of contextual, historical and ethical concepts using research material from a variety of sources relevant to your own practice.

We will be looking for documentation of movements, periods, designers, artists, visual work, concepts and issues that relate to your project and indications of their links and importance to your work, particularly through your draft Research Report.


LO4: Plan your learning, using a range of techniques, references and approaches appropriate to your subject.

We will be looking for an organised approach to planning through charts, schedules, mind maps, timelines, collation of information into appropriate folders, technical plans, costing, material sourcing, etc.


LO5: Evaluate a diversified field of information and ideas in order to make informed judgments about appropriate questions and potential solutions to problems

We will be looking for development of ideas using a range of information (technical, historical, theoretical, practical, etc) and how you have used the information to make decisions on how to take the project forward.


LO6: Communicate creatively and appropriately to a variety of audiences using spoken word, text and images

We will be looking for easily accessible, well organised and clearly labelled material in all of your submission. We will be looking at how easily we are able to follow your ideas and the relationships and approaches you have taken.

mapping practice • As part of your reflective practice you might

want to create a system that enables the assessors to move through your work with ease – ‘pointing out’ important stages in your work and working practice over unit 7.

• Signposting

digital work• If handing in digital work on memory stick or

disc please file work in an organised way.• Research.• Samples.• Testing.• Initial designs. • etc - • Create a file of edited finished work.

what’s nextTimetable of the next 3 weeks• Make work - 1 week• Hand in Nov 23rd

• Make work - 1 week• 29th Nov - • Briefing for small group 8 day project - Dec 3rd

• Make work in collaboration for 8 days • Pitch for collaborative project - Dec 10th

• Building group/team for exhibitions

• Mid point exhibition• Final show

teamshow2012/13

strongly agree

agree neither agree nor disagree

disagree Strongly disagree

The member of staff explained things well. 12 13

The member of staff made the subject interesting. 12 13

The member of staff was enthusiastic about what they were teaching.

23 2

The unit was described clearly. 12 13

I understand the key areas of study this unit will cover. 13 7 2

I understand what we will be looking for at the assessment point.

10 12 2

The criteria to be used in marking has been made clear. 8 14 3

I have received sufficient advice and support with my studies.

1 15 7

Any changes in the session have been communicated effectively.

8 13 2

The session was well organised and run smoothly. 14 10

As a result of this briefing I am able to undertake the unit.

10 14

01 10 12

strongly agree



I have received detailed comments on my work

15 10 2

Feedback on my work has helped me clarify things I did not understand

15 12

30 10 12

strongly agree



The member of staff explained things well. 18 19 1

The member of staff made the subject interesting.

14 18 3 1


22 10 5

The session has helped me to present myself with confidence

15 17 3 1

My communication skills have improved 10 21 5 1

As a result of this session I feel confident in tackling unfamiliar problems

12 16 7 1

I have received detailed comments on my work 23 13 1

Feedback on my work has helped me clarify things I did not understand

15 19 3

05 11 12

• From: Les BicknellSent: 05 November 2012 16:26To: Year 3Subject: Feedback on your comments re pecha kucha

• Feedback on your comments re Pecha Kucha

• Wonderful – in general it was evidenced in the feedback that you have given us that the presentations today (05 11 12) has been really useful in supporting your practice.

• In terms of the session helping and improving your communication skills it was felt that it has been really helpful in focusing your thinking and we would agree that there were high levels of reflective thinking exhibited in the presentations

• You all liked the immediate feedback system (post-its) you all received feedback and felt that it was very helpful in clarifying your work.

• There are just a couple of issues – people wanting the session later (at the

end of the unit). We felt that having the session in the middle gives you time to rectify any problems and focus your work rather than waiting till the end when any feedback would be less helpful – ie you would be unable to react to it.

• On the whole you agreed that the staff made the subject interesting and that we have explained the process, although in your minds there is some space for improvement (not all of you “strongly agreed”) – it would be helpful if you could in some way let us know how we could improve this – possibly some concrete examples through the reps.

• There were issues of nervousness, the only way to get over them is to practice – we are aware that it’s not easy, although we are a supportive crowd. It does get better and of course you are becoming the expert in the subject because you and your work are the subject. Although you may have been nervous you have possibly used this to your advantage. A little nervousness is good for you and ensures that you are focusing on what you have to do.

• Staff did not notice any negative effect from nervousness in your

presentations.

• Something to consider from the staff side is the lack of support some of you showed in not attending the presentations of others. We believe that you may have missed some of the points of the exercise

• 1 - To support your fellow students, to become part of a team who work together

• 2 - That you can see the work of others and judge yourself• 3 – That you might be interested in the opportunity to develop your own

work by looking at the work of others and not producing work in isolation.• So thank you again for your support – if there are any issues or questions

do not fail to get in touch with a member of staff.• • Les / Nick

On the whole you agreed that the staff made the subject interesting and that we have explained the process, although in your minds there is some space for improvement (not all of you “strongly agreed”) – it would be helpful if you could in some way let us know how we could improve this – possibly some concrete examples through the reps.

strongly agree




01 10 12 23 2

05 11 12 22 10 5

NSS• NSS results from last year show that we

scored poorly.

• Interestingly the NSS results reflect on us all.

• Please use the paper to write me a letter – anonymous if you wish – about anything that's on your mind – but maybe a focus could be ways in which we could improve how the staff could make the subject interesting or how we could be more enthusiastic about the subject.

• See you in the next session – thank you

• 11:00 - Groups: A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H• 13:30 - Groups: I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; Q

003 what next post presentation

Design

Transcript of 003 what next post presentation