0 Greater Newcastle Acute Hospital Network– Physiotherapy National Allied Health Benchmarking...
-
Upload
alysa-dormer -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of 0 Greater Newcastle Acute Hospital Network– Physiotherapy National Allied Health Benchmarking...
1
Greater Newcastle Acute Hospital Network– Physiotherapy
National Allied Health Benchmarking Consortium- Health Round Table
October 2009
Total Knee Replacement
Patient Population and Physiotherapy Management Review
2
BACKGROUND
• 376 TKR patients were seen by RNC Physiotherapy as an outpatient during 2006/2007
• Number of TKR procedures in Australia has increased by 152.3% over past 12 years
33,737 performed in Australia in 2005/6 FY
• Public hospital growth rate far greater than private (14.5% vs 1.6%)
• Increasing demands upon public hospital Physiotherapy services• Evidence base for PT management of TKR is quite limited (Naylor et al 2006)
• No clinical guidelines exist for post-operative Physiotherapy• Considerable variation in Physiotherapy practice (Roos 2003)
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, 2007
3
AIMS• To review the TKR patient population receiving
physiotherapy services at the RNC
• To review current outcome measure utilisation throughout the clinical pathway
• To review current physiotherapy management strategies and resource consumption
• To analyse clinical outcomes
4
METHODOLGY• Cross-Sectional Retrospective Analysis
• TKR patients identified via PiMS and AHMIS
• Random sample of 50 records Received pre-operative, in-patient and out-patient
physiotherapy services at the RNC for primary TKR
No post-operative complication
5
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS• The RNC TKR population is similar to other reported TKR
populations in regards to age, gender and reason for arthroplasty
• Perhaps interestingly, the mean BMI in our data was found to be higher than all other reported TKR populations (by around 4 points)
• Previous research has identified that patient’s with higher BMI’s typically obtain poorer ROM (Anouchi et al 1996, Lizaur et al 1997)
• There is strong evidence that the primary patient factor influencing post-operative range of motion is pre-operative range of motion (Dennis et al 2007, Lizaur et al 1997, Parsley et al 1992, Ritter et al 2003)
• Considerable variance in the pre-operative flexion range of movement has been reported in the literature
• However the pre-operative flexion ROM in patients at the RNC approximates the central tendency of these reported figures (104.2°)
6
RESOURCE CONSUMPTION• Standard practice at the RNC involves all patients attending a pre-
operative individual consultation with a physiotherapist 50% of Hospitals in Sydney South West Area Health Service provide a
similar pre-operative service
• Mean in-patient LOS was 7.46 days (95%CI 6.82 to 8.1 days)
• The last outpatient appointment was a mean of 6.86 weeks (95%CI 5.87
to7.85) from the date of surgery
• Comparable to the previously published figures for TKR patients in other Australian hospitals (Naylor et al 2006)
• A low correlation was discovered between age and duration of physiotherapy management, with younger patients attending for greater durations (r = -0.36, 95%CI –0.58 to –0.09)
• Age, Sex and BMI had no influence on any other measures of resource consumption.
7
USE OF OUTCOME ASSESSMENT
Use of Outcome Assessment
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Pre-Op Day 4 D/C (Day7.5)
OneMonth
Last OPappt
(week6.9)
Flex ROM
Ext ROM
Mob Aid
Mob Tolerance
8
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT & PT MANAGEMENT • A review of literature and analysis of the data
identified an opportunity to include further outcome assessment measures Patient Perceived Function
» Eg. Lower Extremity Functional Scale
Measures of Patient-Important Function
» Eg. Timed Up and Go
Patient Satisfaction with Care/Outcome
• The nature and frequency of the interventions used at the RNC appear consistent with those reported in other sites within Australia (Naylor et al 2006, Sydney South West Area Health Service)
9
PHYSIOTHERAPY MANAGEMENT
In-Patient Management
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Mob
Pra
ctice
ROM E
x
Streng
th E
xHEP
Educa
tion
Gait R
etra
inin
gCPM Ice
10
PHYSIOTHERAPY MANAGEMENT
Out-Patient Management
0%
20%
40%60%
80%
100%
HEP
Educa
tion
ROM
Ex
Streng
th E
x
Gait
Ret
raini
ng
Mob
Pra
ctice
Scar M
x
Man
ual T
hera
py Ice
Oed
ema
Mx
Heat
Ex Bike
11
KNEE ROM OUTCOMES • KNEE FLEXION
A small correlation existed between pre-operative flexion ROM and final flexion ROM at the last OP appt (r=0.34)
For each 4 increase in pre-operative flexion, the predicted flexion range at the final physiotherapy appointment increases by 1
Final flexion ROM had no relationship to the number of physiotherapy OOS (r=0.1)
Those with poorer flexion ROM at their last appointment tended to have poorer extension ROM (r=0.29)
• KNEE EXTENSION No influence by age, sex or prosthesis type Interestingly, a small positive correlation was identified between BMI and pre-
operative extension ROM (r=0.37) for every increase in BMI by 5 points, the predicted pre-operative extension
improves by 2 No influence by mobility tolerance or mobility aid utilisation No relationship with the number of physiotherapy OOS
12
KNEE ROM OUTCOMES• KNEE FLEXION
Paired t-test statistical analysis identified the differences in flexion range of movement scores between all of the five time periods to be significantly different (p < 0.05)
Mean Flexion ROM
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Pre-Op Day 4 D/C (Day 7.5) One Month Last OP appt(week 6.9)
13
KNEE ROM OUTCOMES• KNEE FLEXION
No influence by age, sex or BMI at any time point
No influence by prosthesis type at any time point
Flexion ROM by Prosthesis Type
020406080
100120
Pre-Op Day 4 D/C (Day7.5)
OneMonth
Last OPappt
(week6.9)
Genesis
Vanguard
PFC
LCS
NexGen
14
KNEE ROM OUTCOMES• KNEE EXTENSION
No significant difference between extension ROM pre-operatively and at the final appointment (difference = 1, p=0.42)
Mean Extension Deficit ROM
02468
10121416
Pre-Op Day 4 D/C (Day 7.5) One Month Last OP appt(w eek 6.9)
15
MOBILITY AID UTILISATION OUTCOMES
Mobility Aid Usage Through Clinical Pathway
0%
20%40%
60%80%
100%
Pre-Op Day 4 D/C (Day7.5)
OneMonth
Last OPappt
(week6.9)
Unaided
W/Stick
2 x W/Stick
Crutches
Frame
FASF
16
Key Findings & Opportunities• Fairly consistent with other populations reported in the literature
Would seem reasonable to make comparisons Our sample had a higher BMI than other reported populations
• Similar Physiotherapy resource consumption and management strategies to comparable services
• Similar physical outcome measures to previously published reports
• Outcome Assessment Consistency throughout the clinical pathway Patient Perceived Functional Status Patient-Important Function Patient Satisfaction with Care/Outcome
• Investigation of opportunities for benchmarking
• Collaborative research initiatives
17
Project Team• Judith Henderson
Area Professional Director, Physiotherapy
• Damien Smith Team Leader, Royal Newcastle Centre
• Chris Barnett Team Leader, Outpatient Physiotherapy, Royal Newcastle Centre
• Kieren Brown Team Leader, Inpatient Physiotherapy, Royal Newcastle Centre
• Veronica Parraga Physiotherapist, Royal Newcastle Centre
• Robin Haskins Physiotherapist, Royal Newcastle Centre
• Tim Lee Physiotherapist, Royal Newcastle Centre