_ X = 100 Distribution of IQ scores LowHigh How much of this variation is due to genotypic...
-
Upload
constance-richard -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
4
Transcript of _ X = 100 Distribution of IQ scores LowHigh How much of this variation is due to genotypic...
_X = 100
Distribution of IQ scores
Low High
How much of this variation is due to genotypicdifferences among individuals? What is theheritability ?
Maze learning in rats: selection for maze “bright” and “dull” strains of rats(R.C. Tryon 1942)
1. Used a 17 unit (multiple “T”) maze
2. Counted up the number of errors made across multiple trials in the maze (19 trials)
3. Errors were counted as number of entries ina blind alley
4. Rats making the fewest errors were mated among themselves; rats making the most
errors were mated among themselves
Number of errors in maze test
MB
MB MD
MD
Number of errors in maze test
10 54 190
Generation 0
Generation 4
Generation 8
The response to directional selection formaze learning indicates that the heritabilityof maze learning is above zero
What is the mode of inheritance of individual differences in maze learning?
MB MD
10 54 190
10 54 190
10 54 190
F1 rats
F2 rats
Maze learning appears to exhibit typicalcomplex or polygenic inheritance
Are the maze “bright” and maze “dull” rats good and bad, respectively, at other tasks? In other wordsis their “intelligence” general or specific?
In three out of five different measures of learning ability,rats of the “dull” strain performed at levels equal to or Superior to rats from the “bright” strain.
_X = 100
Distribution of IQ scores
Low High
Mental retardation
MENTAL RETARDATIONDSM4 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for PsychiatricDisorders, American Psychiatric Association)
1. Score of 70 or below on a standard IQ (intelligencequotient) test
2. Adaptive functioning: how well the individual meetsage and culture specific standards
3. Age of onset before 18
Degrees of severity:Mild: 55-70Moderate: 35-55Severe: 20-35Profound: below 20
Genetic abnormalities and mental retardation
SINGLE GENE DISORDERS:1. Phenylketonuria (PKU) used to be the leading
single cause of mental retardation2. X-linked (GDI1, PAK3,Oligophrenin, FMR2)3. Angelman syndrome4. Fragile-X syndrome5. Duchenne muscular dystrophy6. Picks disease7. Galactosemia
CHROMOSOMAL DISORDERS1. Downs syndrome: trisomy 212. Turner syndrome: XO3. Klinefelter syndrome: XXY, XXXY4. Triplo X syndrome: XXX
Genetic abnormalities and mental retardation
SINGLE GENE DISORDERS:1. Phenylketonuria (PKU) used to be the leading
single cause of mental retardation2. X-linked (GDI1, PAK3,Oligophrenin, FMR2)3. Angelman syndrome4. Fragile-X syndrome5. Duchenne muscular dystrophy6. Picks disease7. Galactosemia
CHROMOSOMAL DISORDERS1. Downs syndrome: trisomy 212. Turner syndrome: XO3. Klinefelter syndrome: XXY, XXXY4. Triplo X syndrome: XXX
Evidence that genetics influences intelligence in man
1. Genetic abnormalities: single gene and chromosomalaberrations are associated with impairments inintelligence
2. Normal variation in intelligence:Similarities between relatives ?
Demonstrating a genetic component to behavior
1. Family studies: Examine similarities between family members. The closer the genetic relationship,the more similar family members are predicted to be
2. Adoption Studies: Compares biological with adoptedfamily members. Biologically related individuals arepredicted to be more similar than adopted relatives.
3. Twin studies: Identical twins compared to fraternal twins.Identical twins predicted to be more similar
Study Adoptive Children
Biological children
Biological mothers and their children adopted by other parents
Fathers
Mothers Fathers Mothers
Minnesota 1
0.15 0.23 0.39 0.35
Minnesota 2
0.16 0.09 0.40 0.41
Texas 0.17 0.19 0.42 0.23 0.32
Parent-child correlations for IQ in three adoption studies
Conclusion: Despite variability among studies, biologicalrelatives are more similar than adoptive ones.
Test Twins Intra-pair Correlation
heritability
StanfordBinet IQ
MZS (19)MZT (50)DZT (50)
0.690.920.62
0.67 + 0.13
Otis IQ MZS (19)MST (50)DZT (50)
0.730.920.62
0.72 + 0.10
DominoesIQ
MZS (34)MZT (37)DZT (38)
0.730.750.69
0.74 + 0.07
MZS Monozygotic raised separatelyMZT Monozygotic raised togetherDZT Dizygotic raised together
HUMAN EVOLUTION
1. FOSSILS
2. GENETICS
Phrenology is the study of the structure of the skull to determine a person's character and mental capacity. The Viennese physician Franz-Joseph Gall (1758-1828)was an early phrenologist. Bumps and indentations on the skull, according to Gall, reflect specific areas of the brain that determine a person's emotional and intellectual functions. It remained popular, especially in the United States, throughout the 19th century and was highly praised by Ralph Waldo Emerson, Horace Mann, Thomas Edison, and Alfred Russell Wallace.
Where do we come from? Human origins
1. Relationships to other animal groups
2. Relationships to other primates
3. Early humans and their ancestors: Fossil history
4. Temporal and spatial aspects of human ancestors
Domain: Eukarya
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Family: Hominidae
Genus: Homo
Species: sapiens
Australopithecus afarensisEthiopia 4-2.9 myaNo stone toolsSmall cranial capacity
Australopithecus africanus3-2.3 myaSouth AfricaNo stone tools
Australopithecus robustus2-1 myaSouthern AfricaNo stone tools
Australopithecus boiseiEast Africa2-1myaNo stone tools
Homo habilis2-1myaEast AfricaStone tools
Homo rudolfensis2-1myaEast AfricaStone tools
Homo erectusWidespread Africa, Asia
Homo neandertalensis1856 Neander Valley-Germany: various interpretations
such as a race before humans, a pathological specimen of man
Now known to be a specialized hominid restricted to Western Europe and Mediterranean, living in rock shelters and caves.
Homo sapiens
ChimpanzeeTeethBrowCranial sizeSagittal crest
Gorilla
Proposed history for the development of human language
6-7 million years ago Proto-hominids Simple hand gestures. Vocalizations of alarm, emotions, etc.
4-5 million years ago Australopithecine hominids. Advent of bipedalism: appearance of more sophisticated hand signalling
1-2 million years ago Homo habilis and Homo erectusHand gestures become fully syntactical, vocalizations start to become symbolical, stark increase in brain size
100,000 years ago Homo sapiens uses vocal language, zenith of brain development, hand gestures play secondary role
chimpanzee A. africanus H. sapiensH. erectus