While both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays...

8
Compare/Contrast Thesis Statements

Transcript of While both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays...

Page 1: While both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp.

Compare/Contrast Thesis Statements

Page 2: While both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp.

While both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp and “wildlife refuge”; and Passage 2 subjectively portrays the swamp as a “primeval,” “hellish zoo” through diction, detail, and syntax.

Example 1: Combined

Page 3: While both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp.

While Passage 1 employs academic diction, factual details, and loose sentence structures to objectively portray the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp and “wildlife refuge,” Passage 2 employs cacophonous diction, undesirable imagery, and periodic sentence structures to subjectively portray the swamp as a “primeval,” “hellish zoo.”

Example 2: Parallel

Page 4: While both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp.

Passage 1 uses academic diction, which produces a rather technical view of the Okefenokee Swamp; however, Passage 2 employs cacophonous diction, which produces a repulsive view of the swamp.

Topic Sentence 1

Page 5: While both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp.

Through factual details, Passage 1 offers an objective view of the Okefenokee, while the undesirable imagery of Passage 2 evokes the undesirable, subjective view of the swamp.

Topic Sentence 2

Page 6: While both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp.

Comparative Thesis Statements

CombinedWhile both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp and “wildlife refuge”; and Passage 2 subjectively portrays the swamp as a “primeval,” “hellish zoo” through diction, detail, and syntax.

ParallelWhile Passage 1 employs concise diction, factual details, and loose sentence structures to objectively portray the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp and “wildlife refuge,” Passage 2 employs cacophonous diction, undesirable imagery, and periodic sentence structures to subjectively portray the swamp as a “primeval,” “hellish zoo.”

Page 7: While both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp.

To create an unbiased view of the swamp, Passage 1 employs a loose sentence structure, while Passage 2 creates a somewhat biased view of the Okefenokee Swamp through periodic sentence structures.

Topic Sentence 3

Page 8: While both passages discuss the same subject—the Okefenokee Swamp, Passage 1 objectively portrays the Okefenokee Swamp simply as a “primitive” swamp.

Both Passage 1 and Passage 2 use figurative language to develop their contrasting characterizations of the Okefenokee Swamp.

Topic Sentencefor a Similarity