documents.worldbank.orgdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/pt/524561468048855807/... · Web viewThe...

KCDP: Facilitating Participatory Social, Livelihoods and Economic Enhancement for VMGS in the Coastal Region of Kenya

VMGPs: Final Report

October 6, 2015

VMGP Development Facilitated by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd: The participatory Development Consultants: [email protected]

VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page i

SFG1596

mailto:[email protected]


Table of Contents

Abbreviations ivExecutive Summary v

Cost Estimates for Financing VMGPs..................................................................................................viiiAccessible Procedures for Addressing Grievances by the VMGs.........................................................viiiTentative Mechanisms and Benchmarks for PM&E...............................................................................ix

1. Introduction 11.1 Description of the Project Area and KCDP Development Objectives..........................................11.2 Project Components.....................................................................................................................1

2. Review of the Legal and Institutional Framework Applicable to VMGs 22.1 Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups (VMGs) in the Project Area.............................................22.2 Legal and Institutional Framework Applicable to VMGs in Kenya.............................................3

2.2.1 The Constitution of Kenya, 2010: Affirmative action for minority and marginalized communities.........................................................................................................................................32.2.2 The Constitution of Kenya, 2010: Devolution as a constitutional mechanism for service provision to VMGs...............................................................................................................................42.2.3 Constitution of Kenya, 2010: Commission for Revenue Allocation and the Equalization Fund as mechanisms for fast tracking the integration or marginalized areas into mainstream social and economic life of Kenya as a whole................................................................................................42.2.4 VMG communities at the Kenyan Coast and the Constitution of Kenya, 2010....................4

2.3 Summary of Key Findings of the Social Assessment (SA)..........................................................52.3.1 Socio-demographic profile...................................................................................................52.3.2 Socio-cultural and political characteristics of the coastal VMGs and their livelihood bases

102.3.3 Key stakeholders in the KCDP project...............................................................................12

2.4 Summary of Results of the Free, Prior and Informed Consultations with VMGs that Led to Broad Community Support for KCDP...................................................................................................142.5 A Framework for Free, Prior and Informed Consultations with VMGs during Project Implementation......................................................................................................................................15

2.5.1 Culturally appropriate process for consultations with VMGs at each stage of KCDP implementation..................................................................................................................................152.5.2 A framework for the participation and consultations with VMGs in a gender and intergenerationally inclusive manner during VMGP implementation................................................16

3. Action Plan of Measures to Ensure VMGs Receive Culturally Appropriate Social and Economic Benefits 17

3.1 The Methodology and Process Used to Develop the VMGPs....................................................173.2 The Actions and Measures for Ensuring Culturally Appropriate Social and Economic Benefits to VMGs................................................................................................................................................19

4. Potential Positive and Adverse Impacts of KCDP Actions on VMGs194.1 Potential Positive Impacts of KCDP on VMGs.........................................................................204.2 Potential Adverse Impacts on VMGs communities...................................................................204.3 Actions and Measures to Mitigate Potential Adverse Impacts of KCDP on VMGs...................214.4 Examples of CS and CL Projects Proposed by VMGs...............................................................23

5. Cost Estimates and Financing Plan for KCDP Support to VMGs 295.1 Defining KCDP Support to VMGs............................................................................................29

5.1.1 CS projects.........................................................................................................................295.1.2 CL projects........................................................................................................................295.1.3 Decision on CS and CL projects to be supported by KCDP...............................................29

VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page ii


5.2 Cost estimates of the VMGP to be Financed by KCDP.............................................................30For planning purposes, a single CS project is valued at KShs 300 Million while a single CL project is valued at Kshs 400,000. Table 22 presents a summary of the cost of the VMGP that is to be supported by KCDP. Tables 23 and 24 present the breakdown of the cost of financing the CS and CL projects respectively............................................................................................................................................30

6. Implementation Roadmap 317. Accessible Procedures for Addressing Grievances by Affected VMGs Communities during Implementation (GRM) 31

7.1 Level 1: Grievance Redress for Disputes between VMGs and the KCDP.................................327.2 Level 2: Grievance Redress for Disputes between or among VMGs.........................................32

8. Monitoring and Evaluation Arrangements for the Project 358.1 Purpose of the [tentative] monitoring and evaluation mechanism and benchmarks...................358.2 Tentative M&E Benchmarks and Implementation Plan for KCDP Supported VMGP..............35

Annexes 39Annex 1: The Comprehensive VMGP and Cost Estimates....................................................................39

8.2.1 Livelihoods, Economic and Cultural Support Projects.......................................................64Annex 2: Terms of Reference..............................................................................................................107Annex 3: References............................................................................................................................110Annex 4: Photo Gallery: Some Scenes from the VMGP Development Process..................................111Annex 5: List of Participants to the VMGP planning sessions............................................................112

VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page iii


Abbreviations

CBOCDA

Community Based OrganizationCoast Development Authority

CIDPCIGCL

County Integrated development PlanCommon Interest GroupCommunity Livelihoods

CLO Community Liaison OfficerCoECOKCRA

Council of EldersConstitution of Kenya, 2010Commission on Revenue Allocation

CTC County Technical CommitteeGCHM Grievance and Complaints Handling MechanismGEOGoKGRM

Global Environmental ObjectiveGovernment of KenyaGrievance Redress Mechanism

HMP Hazina ya Maendeleo ya PwaniICMIDA

Integrated Coast Management International Development Association

IGA Income Generating ActivityIPP Indigenous Peoples PlanIPPF Indigenous Peoples Planning FrameworkKCDPKEFRIKFSKMFRIKNBS

Kenya Coast Development ProjectKenya Forestry Research InstituteKenya Forest ServiceKenya Marine and Fisheries Research InstituteKenya National Bureau of Statistics

KESKWS

Kenya ShillingsKenya Wildlife Service

M&EMPCMSMENEMANMKOP 4.10PDOPICPICDSASDFSIASSETFToRUNICEFVMGVMGDCVMGPWHO

Monitoring and EvaluationMicro-Project Committee (at the village level)Micro, Small and Medium-scale EnterprisesNational Environment Management AuthorityNational Museums of Kenya[World Bank Social Safeguards) Operational Policy No. 4.10 – Indigenous PeoplesProject development ObjectiveProject Implementation CommitteeParticipatory Integrated Community DevelopmentSocial AssessmentState Department of FisheriesSocial Impact AssessmentSmall Scale EnterprisesTask ForceTerms of ReferenceUnited Nations children’s FundVulnerable and Marginalized GroupsVulnerable and Marginalized Groups Development CommitteeVulnerable and Marginalized Groups PlanWorld Health Organization

VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page iv


Executive Summary

Background to the VMGP development:The Government of Kenya (GoK), with financing from the World Bank, established the Kenya Coastal Development Project (KCDP) as a vehicle for accelerating the conservation and sustainable utilization of the coastal and marine resources and systems in the coastal region of Kenya. KCDP focuses on the marine, inshore and coastal environment and promotes policy, legislative and institutional reform geared at increasing revenue, productivity, incomes and quality of life for the poor. The project became effective in June 2011 and is scheduled to come to an end in October 2016.

During preparation of KCDP, it became clear that the project may lead to some impacts on the Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups (VMGs) in the coast region.These are VMGs whose livelihoods, to a great extent, depend on natural resources within their environments. Restrictions regarding entry to forests and other natural resources areas can therefore result in adverse effects on the livelihoods of such communities.

Summary of the Social Assessment (SA) findings: In order to address possible negative impacts and include VMGs in the project, KCDP undertook a Social Assessment (SA) which is essential for the development of project protocols and clear engagement mechanisms. Consequently, KCDP engaged the services of a consultant to conduct the SA. The objective of the SA was, first and foremost, to interrogate the challenges facing the VMGs and then develop VMG plans (VMGPs) that address the most immediate needs as identified and prioritised by them.Key findings of the SA included:

1. VMG communities in the project area: Seven VMG communities are found in five of the six counties that make up the coastal region of Kenya. They include: (i) Munyoyaya of Tana River County; (ii) WaIlwana of Tana River County: (iii) Waata of Tana River, Kilifi, Kwale and Taita Taveta counties; (iv) Aweer of Lamu County; (v) Sanye of Lamu County; (vi) Wakifundi of Kwale County; and, (vii) Wachwaka of Kwale County.

2. The socio-cultural characteristics and livelihood bases of VMGs: Majority of the VMGs can be categorized as poor, with no reliable source of income and to a large extent, depend on natural resources for their livelihoods and income. Many of the groups do not engage in meaningful income generating activities due to high levels of poverty and lack of external support. They depend on forest resources for honey, firewood, charcoal (for income) and medicinal plants. They also use forests as places of worship and performance of rituals. In addition most VMGs also practice subsistence farming while others are involved in small scale businesses but lack capital and skills to profitably engage in the Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). VMGs that live within close proximity of fish landing beaches are involved in fishing activities but do not receive adequate income from fish harvests due to lack of modern fishing equipment and knowledge.

3. Socio-demographic profile of VMGs: A majority of VMGs (80%) in the five counties - Kwale, Kilifi, Taita Taveta, Tana River and Lamu - had attained primary school education while only 8% had attained secondary school education. Majority (76%) of the VMG communities lived in hut type houses made of mud walls and grass thatched roofs using palm leaves or Makuti as they are known locally. 71-97% of VMGs rely on firewood as their main source of energy. Membership to groups was a main lifestyle in the VMG communities and most of the groups at the community level are registered with the department of Social Development. VMGs have clearly defined gender and age differentiated roles in the livelihood activities that they were engaged. These include small scale income generating activities mainly dominated by women and livestock keeping dominated by men. However, many of the groups did not engage in meaningful income generating activities due high levels of poverty and lack of external support.

VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page v


Legal and institutional frameworks applicable to VMGs: In Kenya, the legal and institutional frameworks applicable to VMGs is the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, which has a number of provisions on how the State should deal with minorities and marginalized groups, including all groups covered by the World Bank’s OP 4.10. Some of the key provisions of the constitution that relate to minorities and marginalized groups include: (i) article27 which prohibits the State from discriminating against anybody on the basis of ethnic or social background or language among other provisions; article 56 which mandates the state to undertake affirmative action programmes to fast track the integration of minority and marginalized communities into the mainstream social and economic life of Kenya; article 100 which mandates Parliament to enact legislation for ensuring representation in Parliament of minority and marginalized communities among other groups;article 260 which defines who the minority and marginalized groups are (and includes groups covered under the World Bank’s OP 4.10); article 204(1) which establishes the Equalization Fund for fast tracking development of basic services such as the provision of water, health facilities, roads and electricity to marginalized areas to bring them to per with other areas of Kenya; article 174(e) which mandates the county governments to protect and promote the rights of minorities and marginalized communities.

The process of free, prior and informed consultations with VMGs that led to broad support for the project: Three actions by KCDP led to broad support by VMGs for the project. They included: (i) the Social Assessment (SA) in which a sample of VMG villages participated actively; (ii) SA validation workshop in which representatives of VMGs from the sample villages had the opportunity to discuss the SA findings, make amendments and give their approval for the findings; and (iii) preparation of this Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Plan (VMGP), the equivalent of IPP, which saw VMG representatives from 73 villages, with each village being represented by a total of 8 people, undertake the identification, prioritization and budgeting for their preferred and culturally appropriate social, economic/livelihoods and micro-enterprise projects.

Actions and measures have been proposed for ensuring culturally appropriate social and economic benefits to VMGs.Five key measures and actions have been proposed by VMGs for ensuring social, economic and cultural benefits to them. These include actions to: (i) enhance and strengthen the livelihood and economic capabilities of the VMGs in order to lift them out of poverty; (ii) fast track implementation of social service projects that are aimed at bringing VMGs to per with other communities in the coast of Kenya (if not better) in the immediate to medium term basis; (iii) enable implementation of culturally appropriate projects that are aimed at preserving and promoting cultural practices and income generation for VMGs; (iv)ensure capacity building of VMGs in support of each of the three key measures above. (These are activities aimed at ensuring that the VMGs access maximum returns and benefits from each group of micro projects that have been proposed in this plan; and (v) ensure the free, prior and informed consultations with VMGs to enable their involvement and participation at every step of the VMGP implementation. To this end, a three step institutional framework has been proposed for the inclusion and participation of all VMGs in the VMGP implementation.

Potential positive impacts of KCDP on the VMGs have been identified.They include: (i) implementation of culturally appropriate livelihood and economic micro-projects based on their current livelihood practices which would go a long way in helping to lift them out of poverty. Such micro-projects would also create employment and enable gainful engagement for VMG youths and adults in equal measure; (ii) Support to community level social service projects such as health, education, water and infrastructure micro-projects; (iii) Support for cultural aspirations of VMGs through the construction/renovation of Cultural Centres and eco-tourism ventures; and (iv) Capacity building of to enable them enhance their ‘technical’ and management knowhow in relation to the micro-projects that KCDP will support them to implement. In this way, KCDP will enable them to increase their productive capacities.

VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page vi


Potential adverse impacts of KCDP on VMG swere also identified. They include: (i) Adverse impacts on their livelihood and economic bases from restricted access to forestry, wildlife and fisheries resources which relate to components one and two of the project; (ii) Enhanced vulnerability resulting from restricted access to natural resources in which they depend for livelihood and income:

A number of actions and measures have been proposed for mitigatingthe potential adverse impacts of KCDP on VMGs. They include: (i)ThisVMGPwhich has proposed a number of alternative livelihoods, social and economic strategies that if implemented as planned would contribute to lifting the VMGs out of poverty while at the same time contributing in the long term to bring them to per with other communities in the coastal region of Kenya in terms of education and general socio-economic development; (ii) Hazina ya Maendeleo ya Pwani which is a grant fund that is accessible to all coastal communities targeted by KCDP including the VMGs. VMGs will be encouraged to prepare proposals so as to benefit from this grant fund; and, (iii) Inclusion of VMGs in the co-management activities under components one and two of KCDP.

The methodology and process used to develop the VMGPs: The VMGP which is the equivalent of IPP, was developed in a highly participatory manner. It involved consultations with VMGs at three levels: (i) during the social assessment; (ii) during the validation of the SA results; and, (iii) more exhaustively, during the preparation of this plan which saw the VMGs literally take charge of the development of the plan. Following the SA and the validation of its findings, the VMGP was developed during four sessions of three days each. It is the result of team work among the VMGs, the county government experts and KCDP technical experts.

In order to develop the VMGPs, the VMGs first worked in their village groups to identify and prioritize their needs and aspirations. In this regard, each set of VMG village representatives - composed of representatives of the youth, female headed households, women, people living with disabilities, men, council of elders, special interest groups such as CBOs and headman – undertook their own village level identification and prioritization of micro projects. Consultations by village groupswere facilitated by KCDP staff comprising County Liaison Officers, Component Managers, HMP Management Team and Technical Coordinators. Similarly, respective county government experts lent support to the planning process.

Secondly, priority projects identified by VMG village groups were clustered into main topics – CS and CL projects - comprising 8 sub-projects. The CS sub-projects were in the education, water and health sectors while the CL projects were in the fields of livestock, agriculture, fisheries, micro-enterprises and eco-tourism and cultural centre ventures. VMGs worked with respective county government and KCDP experts to prepare budgets for each of the priority sub-projects. Final prioritization of CS projects per VMG community was undertaken in plenary where each community was asked to decide on the one most desired CS project to be funded by KCDP in the first year of implementation. It is on this basis that KCDP arrived at the 10 CS projects that it intends to support in the remaining timeframe of the project (see table 1 below). On the other hand, final prioritization of the CL projects will be undertaken by KCDP and VMGs during the village disclosure fora.

Finally, officials from participating County governments and KMFRI participated either in the opening or closing sessions of the planning workshops. In Kilifi where three VMGP development sessions were held, the workshops were opened by the Kilifi County Commissioner and KMFRI Director. In Lamu, the workshop was opened by the Lamu County Commissioner and closed by the Governor of Lamu County. In all cases, the development of the VMGPs were overseen by the KCDP Project Co-ordinator, Component Managers and HMP Teamwho were at hand to give clarifications to VMGs on the direction of the program and make commitments to them on behalf of the project.

VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page vii


The VMGPs provide a clear road map on the needs and aspirations of the VMGs . They present measures and actions to be taken in order to strengthen and enhance the social, livelihoods and economic visions of the VMGs so as to uplift their quality of life. The plans are also a measure for mitigating any perceived adverse effects that may result from the implementation of KCDP since they present alternative livelihood strategies for the VMGs. In addition, the VMGPs provide clear mechanisms for sustainably engaging the local communities (VMGs) to participate and benefit from the project’s interventions and investments. The proposed support by KCDP will contribute to fast tracking the inclusion and integration of the VMGs into the mainstream social and economic life of Kenya as envisaged by article 56 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010.

Cost Estimates for Financing VMGPs

During the four planning sessions, stakeholders (VMGs, KCDP and County Government experts) developed a comprehensive VMGP that, if implemented (by a combination of support agencies including national and county governments), would be capable of lifting VMGs out of poverty and bringing them to per with other communities in the coastal region and the rest of rural Kenya as a whole. Nevertheless, due to funding limitations and the limited timeframe within which KCDP needs to offer support to VMGs prior to the scheduled end of the project in October 2016, it became prudent for KCDP to define the nature and magnitude of support that the project can offer to VMGs. In this regard, KCDP proposes to implement 10 CS and 219 CL projects during the remaining timeframe of the project.

A summary of the proposed projects and budget are presented in Tables 1 below.These have been decided upon, based on the priority CS and livelihood projects as defined by the VMGs in the comprehensive VMGP. They constitute about 11% of the comprehensive budget that was developed by stakeholders. Prior to start of implementation, these will be disclosed for confirmation and adoption by VMGs during the proposed village forums.

Table 1: Proposed KCDP support for CS projectsProject Types Total Number of Projects

to be supportedApproximate Cost of Projects (Mio KShs)

*Support to CS 10** 310Support to CL 219*** 87.6

Sub Total 397.6****Approximate Administrative cost @ 10% 39.76

GRAND TOTAL 437.36* The cost includes the KShs 10 Million (2 Million per county) set aside for hydrogeological surveys for all water

projects.** 1 priority CS project per VMG community*** 3 priority CL projects per VMG village

**** This comprises the cost of developing the technical designs, Bills of Quantity, Necessary approvals,Environmental Impact Assessment

The comprehensive VMGP is in Annex 1 of this report.

Accessible Procedures for Addressing Grievances by the VMGs

A two strategy process is proposed for the resolution of any grievances and disputes that may arise in the course of implementing this VMGP. They include: (i) strategy for resolving grievances between KCDP and the VMGs. The strategy has a twofold internal mechanism consisting of proactive and reactive approaches, with the reactive approach having four steps including recourse to legal and judicial VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page viii


processes according to the laws of Kenya; (ii) cultural strategies for resolving disputes among the VMGs according to the respective cultural dispute resolution mechanisms of each participating VMG community. Each VMG community in the project area were found to have strong traditional/cultural governance structures based on the Council of Elders system and which they indicated were their preferred mode for conflict resolution in the course of implementing this VMGP. According to most communities, any community member who refuses to accept the verdict of the cultural “courts” is cursed by the elders and the community, and is free to seek redress through legal and judicial means. This principle will be applied to grievance resolution in this project.

Tentative Mechanisms and Benchmarks for PM&E

Monitoring and Evaluation are an integral part of the proposed VMGPs. The basic purpose of monitoring and evaluation should not be to prove the success or failure of the project, but to improve the design and implementation strategies and techniques and to guide the VMGs, County Governments and KCDP teams towards achieving the objectives, vision, mission and goals with regard to this action plan. The overall goal of the proposed M&E plan is to ensure that effective communication and consultation takes place between the project and the VMGs and that all three categories of stakeholders (KCDP, VMGs and respective county governments are working as a team and are accountable to each other. In this regard, the proposed monitoring, evaluation and implementation plan will enable stakeholders to: (i). undertake timely reporting and resolution of grievances; (ii) document the performance of the VMGP implementation; and (iii) recommend strategies for improving approaches, design and implementation arrangements.

Based on the purpose, objectives and goals of M&E, the tentativemonitoring, evaluation and implementation plan included in this report presents a framework which gives details of the strategies for achieving the M&E goals and objectives, the objectively verifiable indicators for measuring the implementation performance, as well as the sources of verification and timeframes for implementation of the various activities. Details of the proposed M&E and implementation plan are in section8of this report. The plan will be adapted by KCDP as implementation progresses and as the project learns lessons based on ground realities. The plan will be applied towards implementing the priority project activities that are to be financedby KCDP within the remaining timeframe of the project.

VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page ix


1. Introduction

1.1 Description of the Project Area and KCDP Development Objectives

The Kenyan coast resource base and context: The coastal and marine areas in Kenya are endowed with a rich diversity of tropical marine and coastal systems including (i) coral reefs; (ii) sea-grass beds; (iii) mangroves; (iv) Offshore and near-shore marine species; and (v) cultural heritage. The coastal communities depend on these resources for their livelihood as well as socio-cultural and medicinal needs. Despite the rich endowment with these natural resources, the coastal areas are characterized by extreme poverty and inequity.

Threats to sustainable utilization of coastal marine resources: The Kenyan coastal resource base is heavily degraded due to population pressures, unsustainable exploitation methods and weak governance. As a result of the heavy degradation, the coastal and marine resources in Kenya are facing a number of threats including: (a) open access to marine fisheries resulting in overexploitation; (b) insufficient skills, knowledge, and institutions to promote sustainable use and management of coastal and offshore fisheries; (c) unregulated coastal development posing serious problems of access to fishers; (d) inadequate scientific understanding of the status of the fishery (in particular, the offshore fishery resources) and biodiversity in general, and factors affecting them; (e) unsustainable and overexploitation of the coastal mangrove forests.

The purpose of KCDP: It is against the foregoing context that the Government of Kenya, with financial support from the World Bank, established the Kenya Coast Development Project (KCDP) as a vehicle for accelerating the conservation and sustainable utilization of the coastal and marine resources and systems. KCDP focuses on the marine, inshore and coastal environment and promotes policy, legislative and institutional reform geared at increasing revenue, productivity, incomes and quality of life for the poor. The project became effective in June 2011 and is scheduled to come to an end in October 2016.

Development objectives of KCDP: According to the Project Implementation Manual 2011 (updated March 2013), the Project Development Objective (PDO) of KCDP is to improve management effectiveness and enhance revenue generation of Kenya’s coastal and marine resources . The Project has the mandate of promoting environmentally sustainable and equitable growth among coastal populations in targeted areas through improved livelihoods and value addition. The Global Environmental Objective (GEO) of the project is to strengthen conservation and sustainable use of marine and coastal biodiversity. The project is designed to achieve it development objectives by strengthening the capacity of existing relevant government agencies and by enhancing the capacity of rural micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in selected coastal communities.

1.2 Project Components

The project aims to achieve its development objectives by strengthening the capacity of existing relevant government agencies and rural micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSME) in selected coastal communities. It is designed to achieve its development objectives through four complementary components including:

Component 1: Sustainable Management of Fisheries Resources whose objective is to increase remote revenue earning potential of GoK through sound monitoring, control and surveillance and a transparent process of licensing of foreign vessels. Other goals are to promote research for value addition, market chain analysis, alternative fishing beyond the reef, aquaculture and overall improvement of fisheries governance.

VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page 1


Component 2: Sound Management of Natural Resources which aims to improve the sound management and regeneration of natural resources and biodiversity in the coastal and marine environment as well as provide assistance to communities in the development of eco-tourism ventures.

Component 3: Support for Alternative Livelihoods which aims to promote sustainable livelihood within a sound governance framework that includes spatial planning and land capability mapping to identify sensitive areas, Integrated Coastal Management (ICM), and compliance within environmental regulations and safeguards. Within this institutional framework, the component aims to support community investments and MSMEs.

Component 4: Capacity Building, Monitoring and Evaluation, Project Management and Communication and Hazina ya Maendeleo ya Pwani (HMP). This component aims to promote capacity in the project coordination and implementation teams, promote dialogue amongst national partners and regional stakeholders as well as develop a communication strategy for development outreach. HMP is a grant giving sub-component within component 4 of KCDP which aims at promoting community development by focusing on natural resources conservation, social wellbeing and provision of community services among the Coastal communities. HMP is currently structured into two grant windows:

a. Window 1: Grants to coastal communities to undertake natural resource management (NRM) sub projects; and,

b. Window 2: Grants to coastal communities to undertake community service (CS) sub projects, which are projects that have high impact in a wide area of the affected communities.

The project is implemented by 7 agencies of the Government of Kenya (GoK). They include: (i) The Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute (KMFRI); (ii) State Department of Fisheries (SDF); (iii) Kenya Wildlife Services (KWS); (iv) Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI); (v) Coast Development Authority (CDA); (vi) Ministry of Lands (Department of Physical Planning); and, (vii) National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA). The activities of these agencies, within KCDP are coordinated by a centralized Project Coordinating Unit (PCU) based at KMFRI.

2. Review of the Legal and Institutional Framework Applicable to VMGs

2.1 Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups (VMGs) in the Project Area

KCDP targets poverty reduction in all the six counties that make up the coastal region of Kenya. During project appraisal, it became apparent that minority, vulnerable and marginalized groups might be found in the project area, necessitating OP 4.10 to be triggered for the project. For this reason, the project commissioned a Social Assessment (SA) to identify the VMGs in the project area and to assess the extent of impact of the project’s activities on their livelihoods and culture.The SA identified a total of 7 VMG communities in five of the six counties of the coastal region. The VMG communities and the counties in which they are found are presented in table 2below.



Table 2: VMGs in the coast of KenyaNo VMG Community County1. Waata Tana River

Taita TavetaKwaleKilifi

2. Aweer (Boni) Lamu3. Sanye Lamu4. Munyoyaya Tana River5. WaIlwana (Malakote) Tana River6. Wakifundi Kwale7. Wachwaka Kwale

2.2 Legal and Institutional Framework Applicable to VMGs in Kenya

The Constitution of Kenya, 2010, is robust and all inclusive in its treatment of the IP issues as defined by OP 4.10. The groups and communities that are identifiable as IP by OP 4.10 are referred to as minority and marginalized groups. The constitutional also defines other vulnerable groups in society. For pragmatic reasons, the GoK and the World Bank have agreed to adopt the term Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups (VMGs) to refer to those groups of people who qualify for consideration as IPs in World Bank financed project that trigger OP 4.10. In this context, below are the legal and institutional provisions of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, that are applicable to VMGs.

2.2.1 The Constitution of Kenya, 2010: Affirmative action for minority and marginalized communities

The Constitution of Kenya, 2010, provides the legal framework for dealing with minority and marginalized communities in Kenya. Article 27(4) prohibits the State from discriminating “…directly or indirectly against any person on the basis of …ethnic, social origin or language…” Article 56 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, mandates the state to initiate and implement affirmative action for fast tracking the inclusion and integration of the minority and marginalized communities and groups into mainstream social and economic life of Kenya as a whole. The article states that the state shall put in place affirmative action programmes designed to ensure that minorities and marginalized groups:

a. Participate and are represented in governance and other spheres of life;b. Are provided special opportunities in educational and economic fields;c. Are provided special opportunities for access to employmentd. Develop their cultural values, languages and practices; and,e. Have reasonable access to water, health services and infrastructure

Article 100 mandates Parliament to “…enact legislation to promote representation in parliament of (d) ethnic and minorities; and (d) marginalized communities.Similarly, article 260 (a), (b) and (c) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, defines marginalized communities as:

a. A community that, because of its relatively small population or for any other reason, has been unable to fully participate in the integral social and economic life of Kenya as a whole;



b. A traditional community that, out of a need or desire to preserve its unique culture and identity from assimilation, has remained outside the integrated social and economic life of Kenya as a whole;

c. An indigenous community that has retained and maintained a traditional lifestyle and livelihood based on a hunter/gatherer economy…

2.2.2 The Constitution of Kenya, 2010: Devolution as a constitutional mechanism for service provision to VMGs

The objectives and principles of devolution are presented in article 174 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. The applicable sub-articles that are relevant and applicable to VMGs are:

Article 174(d) which gives the objective of devolution as: to recognize the rights of communities to manage their own affairs and to further their own development;

Article 174(e) gives another objective of devolution as: to protect and promote the interests and rights of minorities and marginalized communities;

The objective of devolution as stated in article 174(f) is: to promote social and economic development and the provision of proximate, easily accessible services throughout Kenya;

Finally, the objective of devolution as stated in article 174(g) is: to ensure equitable sharing of national and local resources throughout Kenya

2.2.3 Constitution of Kenya, 2010: Commission for Revenue Allocation and the Equalization Fund as mechanisms for fast tracking the integration or marginalized areas into mainstream social and economic life of Kenya as a whole

Article 248 (2) (f) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, establishes the Commission on Revenue Allocation (CRA) while article 204 (1) establishes the Equalization Fund which is half per cent (0.5%) of all the revenue collected by the national government each year. CRA and the related Equalization Fund have been established as the constitutional mechanism for fast tracking the inclusion and integration of minority and marginalized communities into mainstream social and economic life of Kenya as a whole. The objective of the equalization fund is to eradicate marginalization and other forms of economic inequalities in Kenya and to bring all groups into mainstream development within 20 years from the date of promulgation of the CoK, 2010. According to article 204(2) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, The National Government shall use the Equalization Fund only to provide basic services including water, roads, health facilities and electricity to marginalized areas to the extent necessary to bring the quality of those services in those areas to the level generally enjoyed by the rest of the nation, so far as possible.

2.2.4 VMG communities at the Kenyan Coast and the Constitution of Kenya, 2010

All the seven (7) VMG communities found in the coast of Kenya qualify as minority and marginalized communities as defined by article 260 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, and therefore qualify for affirmative action programmes as provided by article 56 of the constitution. In this regard, through a participatory process involving all VMG villages in the six counties that are targeted by KCDP, the VMGs have proposed for KCDP financing, a number of livelihood and community service micro-projects. All of the proposed micro-projects (except primary and secondary schools micro-projectsfall under the constitutional and institutional mandate of the respective county governments according the Fourth Schedule Part 2, of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. Implementation of any of the micro-projects that KCDP has identified for support will go a long way in enabling the GoK, both at the national and county levels, to fulfil its mandate under the constitution for affirmative action and service delivery to the minority and marginalized groups.



2.3 Summary of Key Findings of the Social Assessment (SA)

The SA collected both quantitative and qualitative baseline information through a process of administration of questionnaires and focused group discussions with a sample of VMG households and communities respectively. The data contained quantified information on the socio-economic and socio-demographic characteristics of VMGs on the Kenyan coast. In addition, the SA obtained information on the views of various categories of VMGs on the potential impacts that the implementation of the various components of KCDP might have on them. Finally, the SA suggested mitigation measures and alternative support to theVMGs livelihood bases. Below is a summary of the findings of the SA.

2.3.1 Socio-demographic profile

Distribution of the Surveyed Population by Gender

Gender differentiation is often associated with division of labour and socio-economic roles played in livelihood acquisition. The analysis of the surveyed population by gender and by counties is as illustrated in the Table 3 below. Majority of the respondents in Kilifi (50%), Kwale (52%) and Tana River (54%) were females while those in Taita Taveta (53%) and Lamu (54%) were males.

Table 3: Distribution of Survey Population GenderGender County Overall

Project Area Kilifi Kwale Taita Taveta Lamu Tana River Male 103(49.8%) 169(48.1% 111(52.6%) 141(54.2%) 96(46.4%) 620(50.2%)Female 104(50.2% 182(51.9%) 100(47.4%) 119(45.8%) 111(53.5%) 616(49.8%)Total 207(100%) 351(100% 211(100%) 260(100%) 207(100%) 1236(100%)

Marital StatusTable 4 below summarizes the marital status of surveyed VMGs respondents in the project area. In situations where couples work together, better social and financial capital would be achieved. Therefore civil status is an important determinant of resource mobilization.

Table 4: Marital Status of the RespondentsMarital Status

County Overall Project AreaKilifi Kwale Taita Taveta Lamu Tana River

Married Monogamous

120(58%) 112(33.3% 88(41.9%) 127(83%) 60(78%) 507(51.6%)

Married polygamous

18(8.7%) 27(8.0%) 11(5.2%) 5(3.3%) 8(10.5%) 69(7%)

Single 28(13.5%) 165(49.1% 91(43.3%) 7(4.6%) 4(5.3% 295(30%)Separated 10(4.8%) 3(.9% 2(1.0 0 0 15(1.5%)Divorced 9(2.7% 5(3.3%) 1(1.3% 15(1.5%)Widowed 25(12.1%) 17(5.1% 18(8.6 8(5.2%) 3(3.9%) 71(7.2%)Widower 6(2.9) 3(.9% 1(0.7%) 0 10(1%)Total 207(100) 336(100% 210(100%) 153(100%) 76(100%) 982(100%)

Level of Education

Education ensures the population is empowered both socio economically and politically so people can participate in gainful activities and make informed decisions. The results in the Table 5 below show that over eighty (80) per cent of VMGs household members had attained primary education followed by



secondary education at 8 per cent, post-secondary education (1%) and University education (0.1 %). This result was corroborated by the responses from participants during VMG consultation process.

Table 5: Level of Education AttainedLevel of attained County Overall

Project Area

Kilifi Kwale Taita Taveta Lamu Tana River

None 89(43.0%) 131(38.2%) 63(29%) 139(56.3%)

76(38.4%) 498(41.1%)

Primary 105(50.7%) 165(48.1%) 139(64.1%) 96(38.9%) 101(51%) 606(50%)Secondary 13(6.3%) 41(12.0%0 13(6.0%) 10(4%) 18(9.1%) 95(7.8%)Post-Secondary 3(0.9%) 1(0.5%) 3(1.5%) 7(0.6%)Vocational Training

1(0.5%) 5(0.4%)

University 3(0.9%) 2(0.8%) 1(0.1%)Total 207(100.0%) 343(100%) 217(100%) 247(100%) 198(100%) 1212(100%

)

Livelihood bases of VMGs

Livelihood bases of a community are often considered an important determinant of socio economic status of a household. The more lucrative in terms of income, and the higher the number of sources of livelihood household head can engage in, the higher the welfare utilities enjoyed by the various households. Data analysed showed that across the counties, majority of VMG household members are small scale farmers who cultivate their own land or family land. Overall, the livelihood ventures undertaken by VMGs across the counties were found to include: (i) small scale enterprises (SSEs) by individual household members; (ii) group level income generating activities (IGAs) mainly dominated by women and youth; (iii) livestock rearing dominated by men, (iv) subsistence farming at the household level; and (v) small/artisanal fishery activities for those who live next to the coastline or near River Tana. Nevertheless, while most VMG households were engaged in one form of livelihood activity or the other, none was engaged in any meaningful or sustainable activity due to high levels of poverty and lack of external support.

These finding show that VMGs (Waata, Sanye, WaIlwana, Aweer/Boni) have shifted from their traditional occupation of hunting and gathering to subsistence farming. The shift could be attributed to restriction of access to the protected forests or forest reserves by the Government of Kenya. However, there was no evidence of efforts by the government to promote subsistence farming which is the mainstay of VMGs, or alternative livelihood strategies that could support such communities to adapt to a settled life that is not dependent on utilization of natural resources in a culturally appropriate way. Table 6 below presents the livelihood strategies that are being undertaken by VMGs in the coast of Kenya.

Table 6: Occupation of household MembersOccupation County Overall

Project Area Kilifi Kwale Taita Taveta Lamu Tana River No occupation 9(4.1%) 62(20.4%) 7(3.2%) 64(26.4%) 12(6.3%) 154(13.1%)Cultivates own land or family land 136(62.7%) 93(30.6%) 109(49.1%) 90(37.2%) 59(31.1%) 487(41.4%)

Hunting and gathering 1(.5%) 10(3.3%) 9(4.1%) 11(4.5%) 12(1%)Unpaid domestic work 7(3.2%) 2(.7%) 1(.5%) 15(6.2%) 28(14.7%) 69(5.9%)Other none paid work 13(1.1%)Casual paid work 34(15.7%) 44(14.5%) 38(17.1%) 10(4.1%) 20(10.5%) 158(13.4%)Unable to work 14(6.5% 87(28.6%) 52(23.4%) 22(9.1%) 69(36.3%) 248(21.1%)Other specify (SSEs) 11(5.1) 6(2%) 4(1.8% 26(10.7%) 1(0.5%) 26(2.2%)



89 5(2.3 2(0.9%) 4(1.7%) 1(0.5%) 8(0.7%)Total 217(100%) 304(100%) 222(100%) 242(100%) 190(100%) 1175(100%)



VMGs Economic Status

When asked to compare their economic status with those of other communities around them, the VMG respondents indicated that their economic status was below average in the project area as shown in table 7below.

Table 7: Economic status of VMG householdsItem description County Overall

Project Area

Kilifi Kwale Taita Taveta

Lamu Tana River

Below average 86(80.4%) 63(75.9%) 37(46.8%) 61(66.3%) 17(36.2%) 306(75.7%)

Average 21(19.6%) 19(22.9%) 24(30.4%) 23(25%) 30(63.8%) 75(18.6%)Above average 1(1.2%) 18(22.8%) 8(8.7%) 23(5.7%)Total 107(100%) 83(100%) 79(100%) 92(100%) 47(100%) 404(100%)

Similarly, when respondents were further asked how they would rate their household income level based on their expenses, the results were as illustrated in the Table8 below.

Table 8: Household Income Level based on their ExpensesItem description County Overall

Project Area Kilifi Kwale Taita Taveta Lamu Tana RiverUsually not enough to cover important household expense 93(86.9%) 69(87.3%) 74(92.5%) 86(93.5%) 28(59.6%) 375(92.6%)

Just enough to cover important household expenses 14(13.1%) 10(12.7%) 5(6.3%) 1(1.1%) 19(40.4%) 29(7.2%)

Usually have some left after important household expenses

5(5.4%) 1(0.2%)

Total 107(100%) 79(100%) 1(1.3%) 92(100%) 47(100%) 405(100%)

Household Environment

The physical characteristic of the shelter owned/occupied by a household is an important determinant of the socio economic status of household members, especially household head. It can also be used as an indicator of the vulnerability of household. The proportion of sampled respondents that had hut dwellings with earth floor, thatch roofs, wall type made of mud, and poor condition was the highest across the counties. The illustration by county is presented in the Table 9 below.

Table 9: House Type and Construction MaterialsItem Description County Overall

House TypeHouse type Kilifi Kwale T Taveta Lamu Tana RiverMaisonettes 2(1.9%) 1(1.1%) 9(2.2%)Bungalow 1(1.5%) 3(3.8%) 9(9.8%) 25(6.2%)Flats 7(1.7%)Dormitory 7(10.8% 18(22.8%) 4(4.3%) 3(7%) 21(5.2%)Hut 105(98.1%) 57(87.7% 22(27.8%) 78(84.8%) 40(93% 306(75.7%)Other specify 36(45%) 36(8.9%)Total 107(100%) 65(100%) 79(100%) 92(100%) 43(100%) 404(100%)

Material for the Main House FloorEarth 99(92.5%) 63(79.7%) 68(86.1%) 91(98.9%) 43(91.5%) 284(71.1%)



Item Description County Overall House Type

House type Kilifi Kwale T Taveta Lamu Tana RiverSemi-permanent 5(4.7%) 13(16.6% 6(7.6%) 1(1.1%) 1(2.1%) 109(26.9%)Permanent 3(2.8%) 3(3.8%) 5(6.3%) 3(6.4%) 8(2%)Total 107(100%) 79(100%) 79(100%) 92(100%) 47(100%) 405(100%)

Type of RoofThatch roof 82(75.9%) 53(67.1%) 5(6.3%) 90(97.8%) 27(57.4%) 328(65.5%)Corrugated metal roof

26(24.1%) 26(32.9%) 74(93.7% 2(2.2%) 19(40.4%) 173(34.5%)

Mud, sand, plastic/stone

1(2.1%)

Total 108(100%) 79(100%) 79(100%) 92(100%) 47(100%) 501(100%)General Condition of House

Good 1(0.9%) 6(7.6%) 7(14.9%) 7(1.4%)Fair 31(29%) 25(31.5%) 45(57 %) 49(53.3%) 24(51.1%) 76(15.1%)Poor 75(70.1%) 54(68.4%) 28(35.4%) 43(46.7%) 16(34%) 419(82.5%)Total 107(100%) 79(100%) 79(100%) 92(100%) 47(100%) 502(100%)

Household Item Ownership

The availability of durable consumer goods is a useful indicator of a household’s socioeconomic status. Moreover, particular goods have specific benefits. For instance, having access to a radio or a television exposes household members to innovative ideas; a refrigerator prolongs the wholesomeness of foods; and a means of transport allows greater access to many services away from the local area. Table 10 below shows household item ownership by VMGs

Table 10: Household Item OwnershipItem Description County

Kilifi Kwale Taita Taveta Lamu Tana RiverBed 101(95) 65(82%) 65(89%) 44(48%) 34(72%)Chair/bench/sofa 75(71%) 43(54%) 56(77%) 32(35%) 23(49%Table 58(55%) 34(44%) 45(62%) 16(17%) 19(40%Cupboard 11(10%) 5(6%) 7(10%) 2(2%) 8(17%Working radio 28(26%) 23(29%) 20(27%) 20(22%) 29(62%)Cassette/CD Player 2(3%) 4(1.6%) 5(2.9%) 5(11%)Working TV 2(2%) 2(3%) 7(2.8%) 1(1%) 3(6.4%)Stove/cooker 1(1%) 5(6%) 2(3%) 0(0%) 1(2.1%)Bicycle 21(20%) 25(32% 14(20%) 8(9%) 15(32%)Motorcycle 5(5%) 7(3.3%) 4(6%) 3(3%) 4(8.5%)Refrigerators 0(0%) 1(0.5%) 0(0% 1(1%) 1(2.1%)Other specify 1(1%) 0(0%) 0(100%) 3(2.1%)

Access to ServicesTable 11 provides information on services being accessed by VMGs across the five counties in the project area.

Table 11: Household Access to ServicesServices County

Kilifi Kwale Taita Taveta Lamu Tana RiverNursery School 107(100%) 72(94%) 78(89%) 89(98%) 42(93%)Primary School 107(100%) 75(97%) 77(98%) 64(70%) 43 (96%)Secondary School 79(74%) 44(57%) 71(90%) 25(28%) 39(87%)Health Clinic 74(69%) 61(79%) 66(84%) 33(36%) 31(69%)Hospital 46 (43%) 36(47%) 19(24%) 9(10%) 27(60%)Mortuary 4(4%) 34(44%) 18(23%) 0(0%) 0(0%)Community/ Social Hall 21(20%) 21(27%) 28(35%) 0(0%) 16(36%)



Market 80(75%) 22(29%) 30(38%) 17(19%) 16(36%)Shop/ Shopping Centre 63(59%) 66(86%) 64(81%) 22(24%) 22(48%)College/ Higher Education 1(1%) 1(1%) 20(25%) 0(0%) 4(9%)Postal Services 9(8%) 17(22%) 18(23%) 0(0%) 5(11%)Fire Rescue Services (2%) 0(0%) 18(23%) 0(0%) 0(0%)Police Station 18(17%) 33(56%) 29(37%) 18(20%) 21(47%)Chief's Office 64(60%) 69(89%) 61(77%) 21(23%) 42(93%)All Weather Road 36(34%) 55(71%) 44(56%) 24(26%) 7(16%)

Household Source of EnergyTable 12 presents types of energy sources used by VMGs households in the project area.

Table 12: Types of Fuel Used by Households for CookingEnergy Sources County Overall

Kilifi Kwale Taita Taveta Lamu Tana RiverNatural gas 1(0.8%) 10(2.3%)Kerosene 2(2.2%) 1(0.8%) 47(31.5%) 7(9.1%) 57(12%)Charcoal 3(2.9%) 13(14.6%) 40(33.3%) 11(7.4%) 36(46.8%) 44(10.2%)Firewood/ straw 101(97.1%) 74(83.1% 78(65%) 91(61.1%) 34(44.2%) 351(71.4%)Total 104(100%) 89(100%) 120(100%) 149(100%) 77(100%) 431(100%)

Religious Affiliation

Religious affiliations of the coastal VMGs are as presented in table 13.

Table 13: Religion AffiliationReligion County Overall Project

Area Kilifi Kwale Taita Taveta Lamu Tana River Christian 95(89.6%) 24(30% 74(96%) 102(24.9%)Islam 9(8.5%) 56(70%) 92(100%)) 46(98% 70(17%)No religion 1(0.9%) 2(3%) 1(2%) 131(32%)Waata religion 1(1%) 63(15%)Traditional religion 42(10.3%)Total 106(100%) 80(100%) 77(100%) 92(100%) 47(100%) 409(100%)

Mode of Transport

When respondents were asked the mode of transport they use to get to places of work /business, the responses were as illustrated in the Table 14 below. The high number of respondents walking to their work /business places in the VMGs areas was attributed to lack of road infrastructure and motorized transport.

Table 14: Mode of Transport Used to Get to Places of Work/BusinessMode of Transport

County Overall Project Area

Kilifi Kwale Taita Taveta Lamu Tana River Walk 100(95.2%) 75(41.4%) 78(86.7%) 96(84.2%) 42(45.2%) 303(64.9%)Bicycle 3(2.9%) 28(13.8%) 3(2.7%) 18(1.1%) 134(28.7%)Motor cycle 2(1.9%) 30(22.1%) 4(4.4% 5(4.4%) 27(29%) 4(0.9%)Private car 1(0.6%) 1(1.1%) 10(8.8%) 3(3.2%) 11(2.4%)PSV 29(16%) 7(7.8%) 1(0.9%) 2(0.4%)Animal 1(1.1%) 10(2.1%)Handcart 2(2.2%) 3(0.6%)Boat 9(5%)Ferry 2(1.1%)

Total 105(100%) 181(100% 90(100%) 114(100%) 93(100%) 467(100%)



Household Source of Domestic Water

Safe domestic water is a basic necessity for good health. Unsafe domestic water can be a significant carrier of diseases such as cholera, typhoid, and amoeba. In addition, access to safe domestic water is particularly important for women and children, usually girls in rural areas, who bear the primary responsibility for carrying water, often from long distances. Most VMGs were found to rely mainly on borehole/open well and spring/river/ponds which frequently dry up during dry seasons. Scarcity of water among these populations is a barrier to irrigated agriculture which has high potential in the areas occupied by the VMGs in the project area. Table 15 below shows the household sources of domestic water for VMGs.

Table 15: The Main Source of Domestic Water for Households Main Source County Overall

Project Area

Kilifi Kwale Taita Taveta Lamu Tana River

Piped 3(2.9%) 1(1%) 1(1.3%) 9(6.4%) 2(4.3%) 5(2.3%)Borehole/ spring/ well

69(65.1%) 26(25.7%) 60(75.9%) 23(16.3%) 12(25.5% 133(60.5%)

Rainwater collection

11(10.5%) 49(48.5%) 7(8.9) 50(35.5%) 30(63.8%) 27(12.3%)

Pond, river or lake

13(12.4%) 16(15.8%) 2(2.5%) 33(23.4%) 32(14.5%)

Tanker, vendor 9(8.6%) 9(8.9%) 1(1.3%) 26(18.4%) 3(6.4%) 10(4.5%)Other 8(10.1%) 11(5%)Total 105(100%) 101(100%) 79(100%) 141(100%) 47(100%) 220(100%)

Household Access to Sanitation

Ensuring adequate sanitation facilities is a Millennium Development Goal that Kenya shares with other countries. A household is classified as having an improved toilet if the toilet is used only by members of one household (i.e., it is not shared) and if the facility used by the household separates the waste from human contact (WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation, 2004). When respondents were asked to state the kind of toilets they use, the results were as shown in Table 16 below.

Table 16: Toilet Facility for Household UseToilet Facilities County Overall

Project Area Kilifi Kwale Taita Taveta

Lamu Tana River

Open field 50(46.7%) 38(57.6%) 3(3.8%) 67(61.5%) 17(36.2%) 187(44.4%)Pit latrine 57(53.3% 27(40.9%) 76(95%) 42(38.5%) 29(61.7% 231(54.9%)Flash latrine/ Toilet 1(1.5%) 1(1.3%) 1(2.1%) 2(0.5%)Flush Toilet 1(0.2%)Total 107(100%) 66(100%) 80(100.0%) 109(100% 47(100%) 421(100%)

2.3.2 Socio-cultural and political characteristics of the coastal VMGs and their livelihood bases

The Waata community

According to the SA, the Waata, a hunter/gatherer community, is one of the minority and marginalized groups in Kenya but which does not constitute a homogenous community. In the coast of Kenya, they live in scattered territorial groups along the River Tana in Tana River County. They are also found in Kilifi,



Kwale, Taita Taveta and Lamu counties. The Waata living in the Coastal region of Kenya are currently confined next to the forests on which they have traditionally depended for firewood, charcoal, harvesting of honey and fruits for subsistence purposes. They currently complain of being marginalized in the conservation of natural resources including wildlife and other forest resources in their midst. Their main religion is Waata although they practice Islam.

Livelihood: Being unable to hunt and gather freely due to legal protection of ‘their’ former forests, the Waata have taken to subsistence farming and livestock rearing to cater for their basic livelihood needs. Governance: Like most traditional communities in Kenya, the Waata of Tana River continue to govern themselves through the Council of Elders System known as Gasa. Gasas are found at the village, clan and entire Waata community level, with a Hayu (King) as the supreme leader of the Waata. The Gasa has responsibility for peace keeping and conflict resolution at every level of the Waata community. The Waata still rely on their cultural governance system even though they also do have recourse to conflict resolution through the national systems such as the administration and courts of law.

Aweer (also referred to as Boni)

The Aweer are a remnant hunter-gatherer group living along the Kenyan coast in the North-Eastern part of Lamu County on the mainland. The community lives in a total of 10 villages in the forested areas within Witu and Boni forests. They perceive the forest in the inhabited areas as communally theirs. However, the gazettement of all the forest by the government has become a source of conflict. Their population is about 8,000 people (2009 Kenya Population and Household Census KNBS page 397).

The Aweer are often referred to as the "Boni". Considered by some as pejorative, the word “Boni” is based on the Swahili word "kubuni" which means 'to move', in reference to their proclivity, historically, to move around in pursuit of their livelihoods, rather than settle in one place. In 1967, their territory became battle field in the war between Kenya and Somalia and today, they are a vulnerable group, struggling to survive. Traditionally, they depend on their Council of Elders system for leadership.

Livelihood: The Aweer are traditionally hunter/gatherers who are famous for their long bows and poisoned arrows. Their livelihood bases were drastically changed when the Kenyan government curtailed their traditional way of life as a response to the insecurity of the region after the Shifta War (1963–1967), forcing them to settle in villages along the Hindi-Kiunga Road on Government Land between the Boni National Reserve and the Dodori National Reserve while adopting slash and burn agriculture. Nevertheless, the community continues to source their subsistence from forest products such as honey, wild plants/fruits for consumption as food and for medicinal purposes. The Boni people are known for their unique tradition of whistling to birds that guide them to honey.

Governance: Like the Waata, the Aweer also govern themselves through the Council of Elders system known as Wazee wa Mtaa whose responsibility at the village, clan and entire community level is peace keeping and conflict resolution. The Aweer still rely a lot on the Wazee wa Mtaa system even though they also do have recourse to conflict resolution through the national governance systems such as the administration and courts of law.

The Munyoyaya

The Munyoyaya are a small, closely knit group of people, living in the Tana River County of Kenya, with about 20% of them living in Garissa County.

Livelihood: The Munyoyaya (originally pastoralists) have become farmers and fishers depending mainly on the River Tana for their livelihoods. Like Cushitic people in Ethiopia (from where they are believed to VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page 12


have migrated), they practice subsistence farming on the flood plains of River Tana, growing mainly corn and bananas and occasionally fishing. They also keep livestock, though very minimally.

Governance: The Munyoyaya have a strong governance system based on the Council of Elders, the Gasa. The Gasa operates in a miniature scale at the village and clan levels. At the apex of the CoEs of the governance structure is the community level Gasa where the Hayuu (King) is the supreme ruler. At the Hayuu’s court are representatives of each clan that up the Munyoyaya community. The decisions of the Hayuu’s court are binding upon parties in a dispute.

Sanye

Originally, Mpeketoni in mainland Lamu, and its surroundings were inhabited by the Swahili speaking community called Wabajuni and a small hunting and gathering tribe by the name of Wasanye or the Sanye who are almost extinct. In the 1974 Mpeketoni was transformed into a settlement area for landless Kenyans. As a result, the Sanye currently occupy the areas of Mapenya, Mkunumbi, Ndambwe, Witu and Kipini in Mpeketoni.

Livelihood: Formerly a hunter/gatherer community, the Sanye currently relies on subsistence farming, fishing at Kizuke beach as well as honey harvesting in the Witu forest. Currently, the community has three young men who have completed form four and a young girl who is now in form two. This community claims to be dominated by the neighboring Bajuni and the settlers from up country who settled in their territory.

Governance: Like the other VMGs, the Sanye are governed through the CoE known as Gana based on clan lines. The Sanye have two clans and while Sanye village is headed by a Village Elder, the Gana, which is the ultimate cultural court for the Sanye, is composed of 6 elders, 3 from each clan. They are responsible for clan level grievance redress and their decisions are final.

WaIllwana (also known as Malakote)

The name Malakote (meaning slave) was given to WaIlwana community by their Somali neighbors who introduced them to Islam and made them slaves. The people today prefer to be called Ilwana (meaning free men) closely related to the Kiswahili word muunguana translated by Krapf and Cust (1882) to be "a free man". A former hunter gatherer community, the WaIlwana now lives in Madogo in Tana River County along Tana River where they rely on subsistence farming, fishing, bee keeping and charcoal burning for livelihood.

2.3.3 Key stakeholders in the KCDP project

There are a number of stakeholders whose activities have direct impact on the VMGs of the Kenyan Coast. To the advantage of the VMGs, most of these institutions are implementing agencies of KCDP, making it possible for VMGs not only to benefit from their activities but also for these institutions to mitigate adverse impacts of their actions on VMGs. Some of the key stakeholders in the KCDP activities are shown in Table 17 below.

Table17: Key stakeholders in the KCDP projectStakeholder institution

Mandate Participation in KCDP Impact of stakeholder action on VMGs

KMFRI Marine and Fisheries Research

KCDP host Interested in the

success of the project

Some actions of KMFRI could result in restrictions on the fishing practices of the VMGs, e.g.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swahili_people


Research findings should be used to improve the quality of life of the coastal communities including KCDP beneficiary communities

insistence on deep sea fishing; use of the right gears and equipment for fishing etc. could have negative impact on VMGs’ livelihood bases

KEFRI/KFS KEFRI undertakes forestry research while KFS ensures enforcement of forestry laws applicable to protected forests and ensures and sustainable utilization of forestry resources

Through the activities of KEFRI which is a KCDP implementing agency, KFS has opportunity to implement well researched forest conservation and management projects

Development of the Coastal Mangrove Management Plan

Opportunity to involve VMGs and other coastal communities in co-management activities of Kenyan coastal forests, especially mangrove

Some actions of KFS such as more stringent enforcement of laws related to forest reserves could negatively impact on the livelihood bases of VMGs. E.g. the baseline information shows that 97% of VMGs rely on firewood for household energy in addition to getting herbal medicines from the forests

KWS Conservation and management of flora and fauna in national game parks, reserves and other wildlife protected area

An implementing agency of KCDP

Opportunity to involve VMGs in wildlife conservation friendly activities such as ecotourism

More stringent implementation of wildlife protection laws could result in adverse impacts of some VMGs who still rely on wildlife for protein (albeit through illegal hunting)

CDA Accelerating development in the coast of Kenya

An implementing agency in KCDP

Opportunity to build capacity in business skills and focus on alternative livelihoods in VMG communities

The project provides opportunity for CDA to meaningfully facilitate positively impactful development among VMGs of the coast region through implementation of the VMGs aspiration as stated in this VMGP

State Department of Fisheries

Responsible for enforcement and implementation of the provisions of Fisheries Act Cap 378 of 2012 and Article 50 (1) and 59 of the subsidiary regulations

An implementing agency in KCDP

Opportunity to support good fisheries management practices in VMG areas

Implementation of the provisions of the fisheries Act and related regulations especially those that relate to protection of fish breeding areas including mangroves may have adverse impacts on the livelihoods of VMGs who rely on mangrove forests for firewood, herbal medicine, building materials

County governments of Kilifi, Kwale, Taita Taveta, Lamu and

Policy makers for development and conservation related policies and regulations in their respective counties

The county governments have interests in the development activities in the counties and KCDP should align its activities to the County Integrated

KCDP provides a good opportunity for county governments to get to know the VMGs in their counties, to integrate their aspirations as provided in this VMGP into the CIDP and to enable the counties in



Tana River counties

Development Plans (CIDPs) for sustainability after KCDP closes down.Have mandate for the implementation of Article 56 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, on Minority and Marginalized groups, and the County Government Act 2012

the coast of Kenya to fast track implementation of article 56 of the constitution according to the provisions of the County Government Act, 2012, section 102

National Museums of Kenya (NMK)

Conservation and sustainable management of the cultural heritage of Kenya such as the Shimoni Slave Cave and the colonial D.C’s residence

KCDP provides opportunity for the NMK to initiate work that is aimed at enhancing the Shimoni slave cave for the benefit of the Wachwaka VMGs in Shimoni village

VMGs proposed a number of cultural centres and other cultural related activities that the NMK could enhance for the positive benefit of the VMGs. In particular, the involvement of the NMK in the Shimoni slave caves conservation would be of benefit to the Wachwaka VMGs

State Department of Physical Planning

Responsible for elaborating physical planning policies and enforcing the same

An implementing Agency in KCDP

Should ensure that the proposed action in the VMGP are implemented according to the physical planning regulations

NEMA To coordinate the activities of all govt. & non-govt. actors involved in natural resources conservation through strengthening the legal and institutional framework for environmental management

KCDP implementing agencyHas to ensure that actions proposed in the VMGP are implemented according to the NEMA requirements

May turn a negative verdict regarding the feasibility of some of the proposed actions

Other stakeholders include BMUs, Boat Operators and Hoteliers among others.

2.4 Summary of Results of the Free, Prior and Informed Consultations with VMGs that Led to Broad Community Support for KCDP

In order to ensure VMGs receive culturally appropriate social and economic benefits from KCDP, the project undertook an elaborate free, prior and informed consultation process with the all VMG communities in the coastal region of Kenya. This was to enable KCDP understand the VMGs’ social, cultural and economic situation on one hand, and their social, economic and cultural aspirations on the other. In this regard, KCDP undertook the following consultation processes, leading to broad community support for KCDP by all VMG communities in five of the six KCDP target counties:

1. The SA as an opportunity for consultations with VMGs: To begin with, the project undertook a social assessment in a sample of the VMG villages in all five counties. This was done using both qualitative and quantitative methods. The qualitative method applied by the SA involved participatory methodologies, in particular, Focus Group Discussions which enabled the SA team to engage directly and openly with VMGs in the sample villages. In this regard, and in order to meet the requirements of the free, prior and informed consultations (OP 4.10), SA team undertook the following:



They identified community stakeholders or key persons who included village headmen, chiefs and assistant chiefs. These community level leaders were informed of the purpose of the consultative meetings and briefed on issues to be discussed during consultations with VMGs; they were then requested to mobilize VMGs for the consultative meetings and to agree with the VMGs on appropriate days, venues and timings for the consultative meetings.

Meetings and focused group discussions with VMGs in gender and intergenerational groups in order to understand their pre-project situation and aspirations for the future

Administered household questionnaires in order to collect quantitative baseline data on the current situation of the VMGs,

2. VMG representatives invited to verify and validate the SA findings: Secondly, the project invited representatives from various VMG communities to a validation workshop during which the SA findings were presented to them in the Swahili language (which they understand well) after which they were invited to give their input to the findings. The VMG representatives took the opportunity to validate the SA findings and to further articulate the social, economic and cultural aspirations for which they hoped for support from KCDP.

3. VMGPs were prepared by VMGs themselves through their representatives from each VMG village in all five counties.KCDP invited VMG representatives from all segments of the VMG communities – men, women, youth, people living with disabilities, socio-cultural leadership, female headed households, and special interest groups (a total of 8 people from each VMG village) – to a VMGP planning sessions. A total of four sessions of 3 days each saw village level VMGs -with technical support from relevant experts from their respective county governments (to ensure that their decisions were made from an informed point of view) – working to articulate their village level aspirations and to turn these into measures of actions for their social and economic benefit. In total, 61 VMG villages comprising a total of 448 VMG representatives (8 representatives from each village) participated in 3 sessions of 3 days each to develop the VMGP.

4. VMGP developed in a participatory manner using the free, prior and informed consultation principle: The three sequential consultative processes culminated in VMGPs that were wholly developed and owned by the VMGPs with technical assistance by county experts and KCDP staff.

The above steps and systematic actions by KCDP enabled VMGs to give their broad support for the project.

2.5 A Framework for Free, Prior and Informed Consultations with VMGs during Project Implementation

2.5.1 Culturally appropriate process for consultations with VMGs at each stage of KCDP implementation

Each VMG community in the KCDP area have clearly defined traditional governance structure. All of them govern themselves through the traditional Council of Elders (CoE) system known variously as Gasa, Abagasa or Dhuro depending on the VMG community. The CoE system is much entrenched among the VMGs and is their preferred mode of communication. The CoE system is found at the village, clan and community level. Its main traditional roles are peace keeping and conflict resolution (the traditional system for grievance and complaints handling - GCHM – among VMGs.



During consultations with VMGs for the preparation of this VMGP, they indicated that while the CoE is a male only traditional governance institution, they have been forced – with time – to open it up to youth and women for purposes of facilitating an all-inclusive development for all segments of the VMGs communities.

For the VMGP implementation, the VMGs reiterated that the expanded traditional system should be the main vehicle for consultations with them. While the expanded CoE system will be the overall body for consultations with VMGs at the overall community level, there will be, in addition, micro-project committees which will be the vehicles for consultations with VMGs on specific micro-project issues.The CoE at the village, clan and community level remains the institution for conflict resolution during the VMGP implementation.

2.5.2 A framework for the participation and consultations with VMGs in a gender and intergenerationally inclusive manner during VMGP implementation

The implementation of this VMGP will be undertaken in a participatory and inclusive manner. It shall involve consultations with various stakeholders including the KCDP staff at the headquarters level and the relevant county government officials to ensure that the VMGs receive the requisite technical support in the implementation of their development aspiration. Consultations will also be held with the VMGs in their respective villages and at the county levels.

In addition to the traditional structures articulated in 2.5.1 above,KCDP, VMGs and the county government experts from all counties agreed on a four level consultations framework for ensuring inclusive, gender and intergenerational consultations and accountability during the implementation of the VMGPs. This framework, which obligates both KCDP and the respective county governments to sensitize and educate VMGs on all aspects of the micro project, will not only ensure free, prior and informed consultations with VMGs but also their inclusive and active participation at all levels of project implementation.

The four level frameworksare presented in table 18 below. This framework also constitutes the institutional mechanism or the implementation of the VMGP to be supported by KCDP.

Table 18: Framework for participation of, and consultations with VMGsScale Committee Establishment Key Responsibilities

Regional Task Force (TF)

Comprises the following KCDP staff HMP - 3 pax CDA - 1 pax NEMA - 1 pax KEFRI - 1pax SDF - 1 pax KWS -1pax KMFRI - 1 pax Finance - 1 pax Procurement - 1 pax Civil Engineer - 1 pax

Provide general oversight in the implementation of the VMG projects

Coordinate the planning, financing and implementation of the VMG projects.

Coordinate and facilitate the provision of the technical support for VMG projects.

County County Technical Committee (CTC)

Comprises representatives of the following county departments: Water - 1 pax Agriculture - 1 pax Health - 1 pax Livestock - 1 pax Fisheries - 1pax

Provide technical support to VMGDC in the implementation of the VMG projects.

Conduct training necessary for implementation and management of VMG projects

Support development of technical VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page 17


Regional Task Force (TF)

Comprises the following KCDP staff HMP - 3 pax CDA - 1 pax NEMA - 1 pax KEFRI - 1pax SDF - 1 pax KWS -1pax KMFRI - 1 pax Finance - 1 pax Procurement - 1 pax Civil Engineer - 1 pax

Provide general oversight in the implementation of the VMG projects

Coordinate the planning, financing and implementation of the VMG projects.

Coordinate and facilitate the provision of the technical support for VMG projects.

Social Development - 1 pax Education -1 pax County Development Planner – 1 pax Other relevant technical experts will

be co-opted on need basis

designs and Bills of Quantity

County VMG Development Committee (VMGDC)

Comprises 13 members:

In a county, where there are three VMG tribes, each of them shall elect 4 representatives to form the VMGDC. The 4 representatives shall be drawn from the following social segments:

Women Youth Elderly (male) Physically challenged

The 13th member shall be a person who is respected among the three VMG tribes

Oversight role on execution of all projects for the VMGs

Partake in procurement and all financial matters of the project

Responsible for project information disclosure

Village Project Implementation Committee (PIC)

Comprises 9 members;In a village, each of the 3 CIGs on the livelihood projects supported, shall be represented by 3 members

Oversight role on management of project at village level

Responsible for project monitoring and evaluation

3. Action Plan of Measures to Ensure VMGs Receive Culturally Appropriate Social and Economic Benefits

3.1 The Methodology and Process Used to Develop the VMGPs

The development of this Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Plans (VMGP), which is the equivalent of IPP, was undertaken in a highly participatory manner. It involved consultations with VMGs at three levels: (i) during the social assessment; (ii) during the validation of the SA results; and, (iii) more exhaustively, during the preparation of this plan which saw the VMGs literally take charge of the development of the plan. The VMGP was the result of team work among the VMGs, the county government experts and KCDP technical experts.

Firstly, VMGs worked in their village groups to identify and prioritize their needs and aspirations.A total of 73 VMG villages represented by a total of 584 people participated in the preparation of the VMGP in a total of 4 sessions of 3 days each. The development ofthe VMGPssaw each set of VMG village representatives - composed of representatives of the youth, female headed households, women, people living with disabilities, men, council of elders, special interest groups such as CBOs and headman –



undertake their own village level identification and prioritization of micro projects. The village teams undertookthis taskbased on prior information to them by county level experts on the practical implications of some of their livelihood and social service aspirations. Some communities such as the Munyoyaya came to the planning workshop with their traditional “King” and elected member of the County Assembly. On their part, the Wata of Tana River came to the VMGP planning with their ‘King’ while the WaIlwana came with their “Chief”.Consultations byvillage representations were facilitated by KCDP County Liaison Officers, Component Managers and Technical Coordinators, all of who will also be responsible for overseeing the implementation of the VMGPs at various levels.

Secondly, priority projects identified by VMG village groups were clustered into two main topics – CS and CL projects - comprising atotal of 8 sub-projects. The CS sub-projects were in the education, water and health sectors while the CL projects were in the fields of livestock, agriculture, fisheries, micro-enterprises, eco-tourism and cultural centre ventures. VMGs worked with respective county government and KCDP experts to prepare budgets for each of the priority sub-projects. Final prioritization of CS projects per VMG community was undertaken in plenary where each community was asked to decide on the one most desired CS project to be funded by KCDP in the first year of implementation.

Finally, officials from participating County governments and KMFRI participated either in the opening or closing sessions of the planning workshops. In Kilifi where three VMGP development sessions were held, the workshops were opened by the Kilifi County Commissioner and KMFRI Director. In Lamu, the workshop was opened by the Lamu County Commissioner and closed by the Governor of Lamu County. In all cases, the development of the VMGPs were overseen by the KCDP Project Co-ordinator and HMP Component and Sub-Component managers who were at hand to give clarifications to VMGs on the direction of the program and make commitments to them on behalf of the project.

County and KMFRI officials participated either in the opening or closing sessions of the planning workshop. In Kilifi where three VMGP development sessions were undertaken, the workshops were opened by the Kilifi County Commissioner and KMFRI Director while in Lamu, the workshop was opened by the Lamu County Commissioner and closed by the Governor of Lamu County. In all cases, the development of the VMGPs was overseen by the KCDP Coordinator and Component Four Manager under whose docket the VMGP will be implemented were all at hand to give clarifications to the VMGs on the direction of the program and make commitments to them on behalf of the project.

The VMGPs provide a clear road map on the needs and aspirations of the VMGs . They present measures and actions to be taken in order to strengthen and enhance the social, livelihoods and economic visions of the VMGs so as to uplift their quality of life. The plans are also a measure for mitigating any perceived adverse effects that may result from the implementation of KCDP as they present alternative livelihood strategies for the VMGs. In addition, VMGPs provide clear mechanisms for sustainably engaging the local VMGs to participate and benefit from the project’s interventions and investments. If implemented as proposed, they are capable of fast tracking the inclusion and integration of the VMGs into the mainstream social and economic life of Kenya as envisaged by article 56 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010.

3.2 The Actions and Measures for Ensuring Culturally Appropriate Social and Economic Benefits to VMGs

Five key measures and actions have been proposed by the VMGs for ensuring social, economic and cultural benefits to them. These include:

1. Actions to enhance the livelihood and economic capabilities of the VMGs, which aim to lift them out of poverty: These include a variety of culturally appropriate livelihood and income



generating micro-projects such as: (i) goat, bees and poultry keeping; (ii) agricultural activities aimed at improving their subsistence farming practices; (iii) fisheries activities to improve their fish catches and enhance their income; and (iv) small and medium scale enterprises (SMSEs) to enhance their incomes.

2. Social service projects that are aimed at bringing VMGs to per with other communities in the coast of Kenya (if not better) in the immediate to medium term basis: These include a number of social development projects such as (i) basic health services in the form of dispensaries with maternity wings; (ii) educational facilities and equipment, from ECD, primary and secondary schools to vocational training centres and scholarships; and, (iii) water services for domestic and small scale irrigation uses.

3. Culturally appropriate projects that are aimed at the preservation and promotion of cultural practices and income generation: These include the construction of cultural centres and establishment of ecotourism ventures.

4. Capacity building activities: These are activities in support of each of the three key measures above. They are activities aimed at ensuring that the VMGs access maximum returns and benefits from each group of micro projects that have been proposed in this plan. The capacity building activities include sensitization, organization and training of VMGs to be able to implement sustainable micro-projects that can continue to benefit them beyond the life of the project. The capacity building activities are embedded in each set of micro-projects proposed in 1-3 above.

5. Consultations, involvement and participation of VMGs at every step of the VMGP implementation: To this end, a three step institutional arrangement has been proposed for the inclusion and participation of all VMGs in the VMGP implementation. They include: (i) VMG Development Committee (VMGDC) at the county level which is composed of representative of all VMG communities in each county; (ii) Project Implementation Committee (PIC) at the village level composed of representatives of all micro-project committees in each village; and, (iii) Common Interest Groups composed of householders in each village with interest in one or the other of the three CL projects that will be supported by KCDP. (See details in Table 18 of section 2.5.2 above)

4. Potential Positive and Adverse Impacts of KCDP Actions on VMGs

During the SA, it became clear that implementation KCDP in the VMG communities would have both positive and potential adverse impacts. These are discussed below.

4.1 Potential Positive Impacts of KCDP on VMGs

Among the positive impacts of KCDP on VMGs is the fact that KCDP is the first of its kind in the coastal region of Kenya that has gone out of its way to identify VMGs because of their status of being a minority, marginalized and therefore a vulnerable group, and to involve them extensively in consultations concerning their development. Through the social assessment and in particular, during the process for the preparation of this VMGP, the VMGs expressed great hope in the positive benefits that KCDP portends for them. In the words of the Hayuu (king) of the Waata community of Tana River during the VMGP development, “this is the first time that the Waata are being born in Kenya”.



According to the aspirations of the VMGs as expressed in this plan, KCDP will have four positive impacts on the VMGs:

1. Livelihood micro-projects: In the first place, implementation of culturally appropriate livelihood micro-projects based on their current livelihood practices will go a long way in helping to lift them out of poverty. These include activities related to: (i) enhancement of subsistence farming practices through irrigation, modern farming techniques, provision of high yield seeds, land husbandry etc.; (ii) enhancement of livestock keeping activities including modern methods for ensuring success in local goat rearing, beekeeping and local poultry; (iii) fishing activities; (iv) support to enhanced Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) activities. These livelihood micro-projects would create employment and gainful engagement for VMG youths and adults in equal measure.

2. Support to community service projects: In the second place, but equally important, VMGs see a potential positive benefit of KCDP in the potential ability of KCDP to support their aspirations for social service development. In this regard, the hope is thatKCDP will support them in the development of (i) health facilities such as dispensaries that are complete with maternity facilities and equipment; (ii) construction and equipping of ECD, primary, secondary and vocational training educational facilities and related scholarships; (iii) support in the provision of water for domestic and irrigation purposes.

3. Support for cultural aspirations of VMGs: The VMG see KCDP as having a potential to support them in the development of their cultural activities both as a livelihood base and as a means of helping them preserve their cultures and language. In this regard, they hope KCDP will support them in the construction of Cultural Centres.

4. Capacity building of VMGs: The VMGs see in KCDP an opportunity for capacity building to enable them enhance their ‘technical’ and management knowhow in relation to the micro-projects that KCDP will support them to implement. In this way, KCDP will enable them to increase their productive capacities.

4.2 Potential Adverse Impactson VMGs communities

Some potential adverse impacts were also identified. According to the SA report, implementation of the various components of KCDP, in particular, Components 1and 2, may result in some adverse impacts on the VMGs. This is because implantation of the actions proposed under these two components may lead to more stringent restrictions in access by VMGs to natural resources that they have traditionally depended on for their livelihoods. VMGs expressed fear that such restrictions would adversely affect their livelihoods, especially if the projects are implemented without their involvement and participation. In this regard, two related potential adverse impacts were anticipated in relation to implementation of components one and two of KCDP. They include:

1. Adverse impacts from restricted access to forestry, wildlife and fisheries resources: The SA showed that the VMGs to a large extent depend on natural resources, particularly forestry, wildlife and fisheries resources for their livelihoods. They depend on the forests for honey, fruits, medicinal plants, firewood (97%) and charcoal for income generation. They also use forests for worship and performance of rituals. Similarly, the VMGs depend on honey, wildlife and fish for food. The VMGs are therefore likely to be adversely affected if KCDP activities under the two components result in more stringent application of relevant laws, leading to restrictions in access to the resources on which



they depend for food, income, medicine and for cultural activities. Such restrictions would lead to loss of key livelihood and income sources.

2. Enhanced vulnerability of VMGs resulting from restricted access to natural resources in which they depend for livelihood and income: In comparison to other communities in Kenya, all VMGs in the counties in which KCDP is being implemented have hardly been reached with social and economic development. In the words of one woman from the Boni VMG community of Kwale County who participated in the workshop that was organized by KCDP to enable VMGs to verify and validate the findings of the SA, “this is the first time for me to set foot in Mombasa and to eat food like this…” In the words of the representative of the Sanye VMG community from Lamu County at the same workshop, “if you come to my community without being accompanied by a person that they know, they may run and hide on top of trees for fear of the unknown…”

3. Finally, almost all county government officials from four of the five counties who participated in the VMGP development were keen to know who these VMGs are, whether they are Kenyans, and where they live. One of the officials was surprised that there were a group of people from her county whose language she had never heard of before the VMGP preparation workshop. She urged KCDP to video tape and to preserve the dances that were performed by VMGs from the various communities. Finally, one County Government official was elated to know the marginalized and minority communities in his county whom the constitution and Devolved Government Act mandates the counties to include in social and economic life and development of the counties. The quotes from the VMGs and reactions of county government officials go to show the level of enhanced vulnerability of VMGs if access to their livelihood bases is restricted without adequate mitigation measures or alternative livelihood sources.

4.3 Actions and Measures to Mitigate Potential Adverse Impacts of KCDP on VMGs

KCDP has proposed a number of measures that if implemented, will serve to mitigate any potential negative impacts that may arise in the course of implementing Components 1 and 2 of the project. They include:

1. One priority CS project per community and 3 priority alternative livelihoods projects per village in each VMG community. A of 10 CS projects and 219 livelihood projects have been proposed for support by KCDP. If implemented as planned, these should serve in the short term to mitigate the adverse effects of the project on VMGs while contributing to lifting them out of poverty. In the long term, implementation of the comprehensive VMGP by the national and county governments and other actors would bring the VMGs to per with other communities in their areas in terms of education and general socio-economic development.

2. Hazina ya Maendeleo ya Pwani which is a grant fund that is accessible to all coastal communities targeted by KCDP including the VMGs. VMGs will be encouraged to prepare proposals so as to benefit from this grant fund, in addition to the affirmative action funds that the project has set aside for the implementation of this VMGP.

3. Inclusion of VMGs in the co-management activities under Components 1 and 2 of KCDP by updating management plans for the two components to clearly articulate the strategies for the involvement of VMGs in such strategies as CFAs, BMUs etc.

It is envisaged that the above measures, especially implementation of the CS and alternative livelihood projects, are adequate for mitigating any potential adverse impacts on VMGs that may result from the actions of KCDP.



4.4 Examples of CS and CLProjects Proposed by VMGs

VMGs proposed two kinds of projects – community service and communitylivelihoods – for implementation by KCDP. Table 19 presents a summary of both the CS and CL projects as well as guidance by respective county experts on what to take into consideration during implementation, especially with regard to the CS, and some livelihood projects. Table 20 presents top priority CS projects that the VMGs proposed, and the villages within each VMG community, where such projects should be located.

Table 19: Examples of proposed projects and guidance on what to consider during implementationProject Guidance County Technical

ExpertsComments by VMGs Comment by Facilitator

CS projectsHealth facilities

In order to construct a health facility in area, a number of factors are considered. They include

o Population: at least 5000 people for a dispensary

o Distance: within 5 to 10 km radius

There are no adequate health facilities. In some areas, people walk more than 20 km to the nearest health facility

Women have to walk long distance when in labour and end up delivering on their way or losing their lives in case of complication

Public Toilets The village based toilets as proposed have been strongly disapproved by the Public Health department due to challenges in ensuring that they are clean and usable at all time. Village level public toilets should ONLY be considered if they are taken/designed as businesses to ensure cleanliness and sustainability of the facilities while also acting as an income generating venture either for an individual household or a group

There are no toilets or good sanitation facilities and the forest1 is too far, especially at night. For this reason, the community is constantly faced by the risk of getting diseases

This is a critical service that can be offered as a small scale enterprise service (in the spirit of the e.g. the “IKO Choo” service). But this would have to be discussed at the village forum to determine its viability since it involves payment of a token before use

Polytechnic There are polytechnics in the counties but very few students. Parents should encourage their children who have completed class 8 or form and are unable to pursue secondary and post-secondary education to take up the available courses at the polytechnics.

Polytechnics have to have a minimum of eight classes

The distance the students have to walk to the learning facilities is too long

Prior to providing any new polytechnics, the project shouldundertake a survey to determine the number of polytechnics in each of the five counties where VMGs are found as well as the population of students in each of

1Forest is used for open defecation by the communitiesVMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page 24


because there is a minimum of eight skills sectors that must be taught in any polytechnic

A Youth Polytechnic should have between 20 -25 Trainees per class

A Youth polytechnic should cover at least 10 km radius

them. This will guide KCDP in deciding on whether or not to construct a polytechnic. It will also help KCDP involve VMGs in such decision making from an informed point of view

ECD/Nursery Schools

Construction of ECDs is the mandate of county governments and is already factored into the County Integrated Development Plan (CIDP).

Counties require modern nursery schoolswith three classes, playing ground and equipment (swings, slides etc.); toilets, one for teachers and one that is child friendly; kitchen

A nursery school should cover a 2.5 Km radius and have a population of have 25 pupils per class

Primary school should cover 5-6 Km radius and have a population of 40 pupils per class

“We have heard about these plans for a long time but have not seen any ECD being constructed.We will only believe this when we see action being taken by the county government. Such plans by the county governments should not stop KCDP from supporting us in this area”. The VMGs indicated they are willing to provide the required land

Water Water reticulation from rivers is a very expensive affair and government is no longer encouraging this as a means of water provision. This can only be achieved if KCDP joins hands with other departments or actors

In the majority of cases, ground water in the coast of Kenya is usually too salty for human consumption.

Hydrological survey is required to provide data that would help determine how many villages have sweet water.

Some of the county governments are already working on the survey

Borehole drilling is usually a risky affair since, if the water turns out to be salty or inadequate, then the investment would have gone down the drain

An inventory of the shallow wells and their conditions is required to determine if rehabilitation is needed or a

Whatever solutions are agreed upon, if KCDP is going to intervene in the water sector, modalities for operation, maintenance and sustainability of whichever kind of water project must be a subset of the project implementation



totally new construction For all water projects,

hydrological survey report is needed to be able to come up with the best possible options for resolving the water problems in the coast, including the VMG villages

Livelihood projectsGoat rearing There is going to be sub-division

of land as the counties grow. Thismeans grazing land will keep reducing in size resulting in heightened tensions with regard to pasture and water. So, hybrid goats are the way to go.

The advantages are:o Hybrid goats don’t need lots

of land for grazing, o Grade goats produce lots of

milk for commercial and domestic use and they don’t need to graze because their feeds can be gotten from farm produce

o Just one goat is adequateo County governments are

providing vaccines for freeof charge

However, maintenance costs especially feeds and medicines are quite and time consuming

Indigenous goats are less demanding to maintain but also less profitable, so many goats (10 and above) are required to realize good profits

Indigenous goats are preferable because they are easy to maintain and are disease resistant

They can be easily sold to get money, thus people are able to cater for their needs e.g. can be sold to pay school fees.

The goats also have some cultural value e.g. they are used during funerals and marriage ceremonies

Farmers are now required to pay for extension/technical support services which is a must in hybrid goats making it expensive to sustain

Poultry Rearing of broiler or indigenous chicken is possible and both are profitable, but this should be done in large scale for commercial to realize the benefits

Indigenous chicken are diseases resistant provided the vaccines are well administered. They are also free-ranging and very easy to look after. Demand for indigenous Chicken and eggs is also very high

The challenge with Broiler chicken is that it requires ready market since the more it is kept after the required 6 weeks the more they start eating into the

Indigenous chicken is the preferred breed because it is cheaper to maintain (free-ranging and disease resistant)

It is to sustain the indigenous chicken breed since only four chicken and one cockerel are required to start a breed

Chicken breed does not require much expert support

VMGs do not have ready market for broiler poultry produce

Also, farmers are now required to pay for extension/technical support



profit and lose market value. They also require close

monitoring and are more prone to diseases. The housing structure for broiler chicken is also expensive to construct

The county governments are giving farmers New Castle vaccine free of charge, which is the only common disease among these breeds

services which is a must in hybrid chicken making it expensive to sustain

Fish farming and deep sea fishing

Fish farming requires a lot of water

o A survey would have to be conducted in the villages to determine the source of water and the feasibility of sustaining fish ponds

Deep sea fishing requires training on use of equipment and safety gear

Cattle There is division of land as the county grows and grazing land keeps reducing so grade cows are the way to go

They do not require a large piece of land because they zero graze

They produce lots of milk for both domestic and commercial use

They are difficult to maintain and must be closely monitored

The county is providing the vaccines for free

This project was requested by only some of the VMG villages from Kwale County which preferred Borana breed as these usually do well in arid and semi-aridconditions. They also produce good meat and milk (in terms of quality and quantity)

Farmers are now required to pay for extension/technical support services which is a must in hybrid cattle making it expensive to sustain

Eco-tourism and cultural centre ventures

These require land to be provided either by the county governments or by the communities

These conservation friendly ventures may not be replicated for each community in each county. It would be prudent for all VMGs in each county to agree on joint eco-tourism and cultural centre ventures to maximise on benefits. E.g. a cultural Centre in Tana River, Lamu



or Kwale could be constructed in such a way as to have sections for each community to display their cultures. In this way, targeting tourists becomes easy

Other CL projects proposed by VMGs(i) Beekeeping; (ii) Micro-enterprises such as (a) food and vegetable vending; (b) food, vegetable and grocery kiosks; (c)

second hand clothes sale; (d) sale of paraffin; (e) water tank and water kiosk/stand pipe to enable sale of water; (f) poultry sales; (g) goats sales; (h) commercial fodder; (i) motor bike taxis;

(iii) Irrigated, rain-fed and greenhouse farming (including fencing and clearing of farms and related infrastructure, equipment and inputs);

(iv) Tree nurseries.



Table 20: Summary of priority CS projects proposed by each community for initial KCDP supportCommunity/ Project Munyoyaya

Tana RiverWaata Tana River

WaIlwana Tana River

Waata Kilifi

Waata Kwale

WakifundiKwale

Wachwaka Kwale

Waata Taita Taveta

Sanye Lamu

AweerLamu

Remarks

Priorities in the Health SectorDispensary construction

Hadhama village

Darime village

Tune village

Kisimeni village

For cost estimates, see Annex 1

Maternity Wing construction (complete with equipment, laboratory, incinerator, sanitary facilities, referral system, solar lighting, and staff houses)

Fikirini village. (The maternity wing should be added to the existing Fikirini dispensary

Milimani village. (The maternity wing should have equipment, laboratory, incinerator, sanitary facilities, referral system, solar lighting, and houses

Dispensary and Maternity Wing construction

Shirango A (Mitangani) village

Mkunubi village (renovation, laboratory and equipment)

Priorities in the Education SectorPolytechnic construction

Chamari village

Shimoni Bondeni village

Primary School Bulaqumudhu village

Shakele village (7 classrooms)

Kiangwi village (3 classrooms, desks, teachers tables, teachers chairs

Secondary School construction

Nanighi village

Nursery School (ECD)

Gora

Priorities for the Water SectorWater facilities (Boreholes,Water Pans,Rock Catchment,Piped Water etc.)

A decision on priority water projects could not be made as such a decision has to be based on the hydrological survey to determine the feasibility of the water sources. The need for the proposed water projects (see budgeted Community Service Projects) was however presented and acknowledged as necessary for the growth of the communities.

Kwadae, Kizuke, Bahati Njema and Shekale

Priorities for the Infrastructure SectorBridge repair Bombi



5. Cost Estimates and Financing Plan for KCDP Support to VMGs

5.1 Defining KCDP Support to VMGs

KCDP had commissioned a Social Assessment (SA) in 2013 with the key objective of interrogating the challenges facing the VMGs in order to determine the impacts of KCDP actions on theirlivelihoods,social, economic and cultural aspects of life. A subset of the SA was the development of VMG plans (VMGPs) formitigating any adverse impacts on VMGs and for addressing their most immediate livelihoods and other needs as identified and prioritised by them. This plan would then form the basis for KCDP intervention. As the SA was heavily delayed, and consequently the intended KCDP support towards VMGs is yet to be provided.

In July/August 2015, stakeholders (VMGs, KCDP and County Government experts) developed an ambitious and comprehensive VMGP during 4 planning sessions. The comprehensive VMGP presents priority CS and CL projects which, if implemented, are capable of not only mitigating any adverse impacts of the project on VMGs, but also lifting them out of poverty and socio-economic marginalization and vulnerability.

However, due to funding limitations for financing the entire VMGP and in view of the time remaining to the end of the project in October 2016, it became necessary for KCDP to define the nature and magnitude of support that the project can practically offer to VMGs. This definition is discussed below.The comprehensive VMGP is presented in Annex 1.

5.1.1 CS projects

Community Service projects aim to improve access to essential social services and provide benefits to the entire community or a large section of the community. The projects also seek to bring VMGs to per with other communities in the coast of Kenya (if not better) in the immediate to medium term basis. Such projects may not be implemented by a single Common Interest Group (CIG) but rather at the level of a VMG. For planning purposes, a single CS is valued at KShs 30 Million which includes civil works, equipment and furniture.

5.1.2 CL projects

Community Livelihood projects seek to raise income or provide direct benefit to community members and generally enhance the livelihood and economic capabilities of the VMGs in order to lift them out of poverty. Such projects may be implemented by a sub section of a community or a CIG at the village level.

5.1.3 Decision on CS and CL projects to be supported by KCDP

In order to decide on CS and CL projects for KCDP financing, and to manage expectations with regard to implementation of the comprehensive VMGP, VMGs in each of the planning sessions were asked to identify a single priority CSproject per VMG community and three priority CL projects per VMG village. Through this approach, 10 CS and 219 CL projects were prioritised as shown in table 21.



Table 21: Number of prioritised CS and CL project per VMG and VMG village

County

Community Service Projects Community Livelihood Projects

No. of VMGs in the county

No. of prioritized CS

project

Total No. of VMG villages in

the county

No. of ProposedCL projects

Lamu 2 2 12 36Tana River 3 3 44 132Kilifi 1 1 7 21Kwale 3 3 6 18Taita Taveta 1 1 4 12

TOTAL 10 10 73 219

5.2 Cost estimates of the VMGP to be Financed by KCDP

For planning purposes, a single CS project is valued at KShs 300 Million while a single CL project is valued at Kshs 400,000. Table 22 presents a summary of the cost of the VMGP that is to be supported by KCDP. Tables 23 and 24 present the breakdown of the cost of financing the CS and CL projects respectively.

Table 22: Summary cost of KCDP support to VMGsProject Types Total Number of Projects

Proposedfor KCDP supportApproximate Cost of Projects (Mio

KShs)Support to CS 10* 310**Support to CL 219*** 87.6

Sub Total 397.6****Approximate Administrative cost @ 10% 39.76

GRAND TOTAL 437.36*One priority CS project per VMG community in each county.** The cost includes the KShs 10 Million set aside for hydrogeological surveys for all water projects.*** Three priority CL projects per VMG village.**** This comprises the cost of developing the technical designs, Bills of Quantity, Necessary approvals and EIAs.

Table 23: Breakdown of number and approximate cost of financing the prioritised CS projectsCounty No. of VMGs communities

in the countyNo. of prioritized CS

projectsApproximate value of SCS Projects

(Mio KShs.)Lamu 2 2 60Tana River 3 3 90Kilifi 1 1 30Kwale 3 3 90Taita Taveta 1 1 30

Total 10 10 300Cost of feasibility study for water projects in 5 counties 10

Grand Total Costs 310



Table 24: Breakdown of number and approximate cost of financing the prioritised CL projectsCounty No. of VMGs

communities VMG villages in the county

No. of prioritized CL projects

Approximate value of CL Projects (Mio KShs.)

Lamu 2 12 36 14.4Tana River 3 44 132 52.8Kilifi 1 7 21 8.4Kwale 3 6 18 7.2Taita Taveta 1 4 12 4.8

TOTAL 10 73 219 87.6

6. Implementation Roadmap

The road map outlined below provides some of the key steps that will be followed in the implementation of the KCDP supported VMGP.

Table 25: Implementation plan for 10 CS projectsNo. Activity Timeline1 Disclosure of VMGP at the County Government level October, 2015

2 Establishment of institutional arrangement for implementation of priority projects October, 2015

3 Disclosure of VMGP at the village level in the respective counties November 2015

4 Technical design of priority projects - Site visits, design & BQs November, 2015

5 Environmental and Social Impact screening of the priority projects December, 2015

6 Approval of the technical designs by relevant county government departments December, 2015

7 Preparation of bid documents and sale December, 20158 Bids evaluation and award of tender January, 20169 Contract award and sight handing over January, 2016

Table 26: Implementation plan for CL projectsNo. Activity Timeline1. Prioritization of livelihood projects with high impacts October, 2015

2. Identification of capacity building needs in prioritized livelihood projects October, 2015

3. Engagement of extension service and partnerships in the respective counties October, 2015

4. Commencement of training November, 2015

7. Accessible Procedures for Addressing Grievances by Affected VMGs Communities during Implementation (GRM)

Grievance redress mechanisms (GRMs) comprise institutions, instruments, methods and processes by which a resolution to a grievance is sought and provided. In the case of KCDP, the mechanisms will provide an effective avenue for expressing concerns and achieving remedies for VMGs who may be aggrieved in the course of project implementation. Grievances and disputes may arise at several stages of the project’s implementation and may be related to KCDP, or may be a result of conflicts between various VMG groups affected by the project. A two level grievance mechanism is proposed, each consisting of a number of steps or tiers



7.1 Level 1: Grievance Redress for Disputes between VMGs and the KCDP

To redress grievances that may arise between VMGs and KCDP, a two-fold (internal) mechanism is proposed to compliment the laid down external administrative, legal and judicial mechanisms such as the offices of the chief, Deputy County Commissioner, County Commissioner etc., human right groups such the Kenya National Human Rights Commission (KNHRC) and the courts of law. The two-pronged internal mechanism is designed with the aim of resolving grievances between VMGs and the project at the earliest opportunity. It consists of proactive and reactive approaches.

Proactive Approach: This approach promotes a common understanding through a three-pronged process following free, prior and informed consultation and dialogue, including: (a) wide-spread disclosure of project information and discussions on the way forward with regard to known complaints; (b) clarification of the criteria of eligibility for assistance; (c) clarification of the duties and responsibilities of KCDP, VMGs, county governments and other stakeholders.

Reactive Approach: Conflicts that do arise between VMGs and the KCDP in the course of project implementation would be dealt with at four levels:

i. Step 1: Project level. Meeting of minds between the VMGs’ CDC and the project’s TT (see 2.5.2 above) to consult and agree way forward for resolving the conflict.

ii. Step 2: Administrative level. Should the aggrieved VMG not be satisfied with the resolution at level 1, they can refer the matter for administrative resolution with the Deputy County Commissioner/County Commissioner acting as an arbitrator between the project and KCDP.

iii. Step 3: Mediation. If the dispute between the VMGs and the project cannot be resolved at the project and administrative levels, both the VMGs and the project may agree to seek mediation from an agreed party including the human rights bodies, the faiths’ bodies or other institutions such as the Arbitration Institute of Kenya.

iv. Step 4: Judicial process: Should resolution of the dispute fail at levels 1-3, the aggrieved VMG(s) would be free to seek redress from the courts of law of Kenya.

7.2 Level 2: Grievance Redress for Disputes between or among VMGs

Each VMG community is made up of a number of clans and the traditional governance system is structured along clan lines. For example, the Munyoyaya community is made up of 6 clans while the Waata community is made up of seven clans. Similarly, the Aweer are made of 7 clans (Uko) while the Wachwaka are made of two clans.

Among the VMGs, governance is vested in the Council of Elders (CoE) system known as the Gasa/Abagasaamong the Munyoyaya, Waata and WaIlwana among others, Ghana among the Sanyeand WazeewaMtaa among the Aweer.Among the Munyoyaya and Waata of Tana River and the Wachwaka of Kwale for example, the Hayuu (King/Chairman) is at the apex of the Gasa (CoE system/or court). All clans that make up the community come together to elect the Hayuu based on clear criteria such as integrity, honesty, selflessness, conflict resolution abilities, knowledge of the community’s history and traditions and ability to help community members make peace with each other quickly in case of a grievance.

All VMGs in each of the five counties in the coast of Kenya proposed the traditional grievance redress mechanism as the effective means of resolving disputes that may arise among them as a result of the project. In all cases, each of the seven VMG communities – Waata, Munyoyaya, WaIlwana, Sanye, Aweer, Wakifundi and Wachwaka – insisted that any community member who refuses to accept the decisions of the cultural grievance redress mechanism applicable to their respective communities – the Council of Elders system – is a cursed person and is free to seek redress in courts of law. VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page 33


Conflict resolution and decision making: Decisions on all important community issues and conflict resolution are vested in the Gasa which is headed by the Hayuu or the equivalent of a Hayuu depending on the community. The Hayuu is supported in his role by one elder (minister) from each clan that make up the VMG community. In addition to the Hayuu and his ‘ministers’, the Hayuu’sGasa has three elders (members of the Gasa), also from each clan. In this regard, the Munyoyaya of Tana River has a Gasa that is composed of 25 elders: 18 members (3 from each of the 6 clans), 6 “ministers” (one from each clan) and the Hayuu (King) who, once he is elected, ceases any role in the clan and becomes “clanless”. For the Waata of Tana River, the Gasa is composed of 29 elders (7 ‘ministers’, 21 members and the Hayuu).

For conflict resolution, the institution of the CoEs (Gasa/Abagasa/Gana/Wazee wa Mtaa…) is the equivalent of a court for VMGs. Conflicts among VMGs at the village level or among members of VMG groups are resolved by the traditional governance system as the preferred mode. The institution of the CoE (which is a male only institution) and the village headman rely on socio-cultural arbitration and mediation skills to settle disputes within the community. Such traditional mechanisms were found to be important in promoting peace and development within the VMG communities. All VMG groups at the Kenyan Coast indicated that they will use the traditional system to resolve any conflicts that may arise in the course of project implementation. Below is the four tier system for traditional conflict resolution.

i. Tier 1: Village level: At this level, there is a council of elders which is the first level of conflict resolution. A complainant in dispute with another villager brings the matter to the Village Elder who summons other elders and chairs the meeting to resolve the dispute and impose fines as appropriate.

ii. Tier 2: Clan level:An issue that cannot be resolved at the village level will be handled at the clan level by the 3 members of the Hayuu’s court who form the clan level CoE. Like the village level, they listen to the dispute, make decisions and impose fines as appropriate.

iii. Tier 3: The Hayuu’s court:If the issue is not resolved at clan level CoE, the Hayuu and his cabinet will listen to the conflict and try to resolve it. If they fail, they will invite the entire cabinet and members (3 from each clan) to handle the matter. The decision of the full Hayuu’s court is final and should (traditionally) be binding on the community.

iv. Tier 4:Judicial process: In modern times, the conflicting parties are also free to seek redress from courts of law or other avenues although this is not likable to the community. At this juncture, the party to the dispute who refuses to listen to the elders will be cursed by the elders and the community, and will be free to seek redress from other avenues including the administrative and legal avenues as appropriate.

Conclusions of disputes: It is important to note that in all cases of grievance redress by the respective cultural courts, the court sittings and deliberations are concluded when:(i)decisions are reached and a fine is imposed on the offending community member, (ii) the offending community member accepts the verdict and pays all the fines that have been imposed by the court. The fine is usually in the form of a goat or cow that is slaughtered for the elders to eat and cleanse the offending community member. In addition, the offender also brews traditional beer for the elders and also pays the victim a fine as dictated by the court. Failure to honor the fines or refusal to accept the traditional courts verdict may result in a curse or banishment of the offender. Among the VMGs, it is only the ‘cursed’ offender who may seek redress from a court of law. Otherwise, decisions of the traditional courts are normally respected and according to VMGs, the CoE system is effective in grievance and this is what they will use to resolves disputes among them in the course of project implementation.

Examples of the CoE system are presented in figures 1 and 2 below, representing the Munyoyaya/Waata and Wachwaka CoEs respectively. Almost all VMG communities in the coast of Kenya are organized in similar ways for conflict resolution albeit with different names for the various levels.

Fig. 1: The grievances redress mechanism among the Munyoyaya VMG community


HAYUU’s (King) Supreme Court composed of the Hayuu, the 6 respected elders (Ministers) -one from each of the 6 clans - and all the Clan Level Council of Elders’

members, 3 from each clan

Village level mechanism headed by a Village Elder who sits with other village level elders to preside over disputes

Clan Level Council of Elders is the 2nd level for dispute resolution. It is composed 3 elders from each of the clans that make up the Munyoyaya VMG community

First level of the HAYUU’s (King) court composed of the Hayuu and his respected elders, one from each clan


Fig 2: Grievances redress mechanism among the Wachwaka VMG community of Kwale



8. Monitoring and Evaluation Arrangements for the Project

8.1 Purpose of the [tentative]monitoring and evaluation mechanism and benchmarks

Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are the processes of tracking implementation progress and assessing project performance and results, the effectiveness of results and outcomes, and, efficiency in the utilization of project resources. On-going internal M&Ealso help to detect early, the relevance of the project to the target group and whether or not it is in line to achieve its objectives and goals. Internal and external M&Eresults are used to shape progress and to put the project on the way to achieving its design objects by recommending remedial actions at every stage of the implementation process.

For KCDP, on-going participatory M&E by the project staff, the beneficiaries and the county government experts - is a vital part of the proposed VMGPs. The basic purpose of this on-going M&Eshould not be to prove the success or failure of the project, but to improve the design and implementation strategies and techniques, and to guide the implementing institutions (see Table 18 in section 2.5.2 above) while working as a team, towards achieving the objectives, vision, mission and goals with regard to the implementation plan presented in section 6.

To ensure effective internal M&E, all stakeholders in the prosed implementation and communication mechanism (2.5.2 above)including the VMGs represented by the CDC, the VPIC, and MPCs, the respective county government represented by the CTST and the KCDP represented by PTT, shall participate in monitoring and evaluating implementation of the proposed actions in an on-going basis with a view to ensuring all actions are being implemented as agreed and recommending immediate remedial actions as and when such need arises. For this to be achieved, M&E findings have to be interpreted and analysed, and results used for decision making and planning.

8.2 Tentative M&E Benchmarks and Implementation Plan for KCDP Supported VMGP

A tentative mechanism and benchmarks appropriate to the project for monitoring, evaluating and reporting on the implementation of the KCDP supported VMGPs are presented in the monitoring, evaluation and implementation plan in table 27 below. It takes into consideration, the remaining time to the end of KCDP in October, 2016, and the implementation roadmap that has been proposed by the project. Nevertheless, the plan can be adapted to be more realistic and SMART as implementation realities and environment become clearer.

Table 27: Tentative Monitoring, Evaluation and Implementation PlanResponsibility: KCDP; Respective County Governors and Chief Officers Implementation start date: October

2015A. Community service projects

Activity/Issue Goals/Objective Strategies/Main Activities

Indicators/Milestones Sources of verification

Community service projects

Issue

Most VMGs communities at

To improve access to basic community services among VMG communities in the Kenya Coast

To disclose the VMGP and establish and train the proposed implementation institutions at

Indicators 5 CDCs have been established and

trained on their project implementation oversight roles by end December 2015

5 county governments have been sensitized on the VMG projects by end November 2015

Progress reports

Monitoring reports

MoUs Training

manuals



the coast of Kenya are unserved in terms of the proposed community service projects. Implementation of these project would, in the medium to long term basis, serve to bring them to per with dominant communities in the coast of Kenya

To bring them to per with other communities in the coast of Kenya as far as these services are concerned

To equip VMGs with skills and capacity to implement and sustain their CSPs in collaboration with the appropriate authorities

To contribute to the fast tracking of implementation of article 56 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, on Minorities and Marginalized communities

all levels Establishment

and training / sensitization of VMGDCs, PICs, TF and CTCs

To put in place, sustainability strategies for each of the CS in agreement with the respective county governments and VMGs

To identify sites/locations for implementation of agreed CS projects in collaboration with the respective county governments and VMGs

To implement CS projects

5 MoUs signed between and among stakeholders (including relevant national government department for e.g. staffing for primary schools) as appropriate by end November 2015

10 CSPs completed by end of project (EoP)

10 VMGDCs and 73 PICs established and trained on their roles by end January, 2016

1 TF and 5 CTCs have been established and sensitized (ToRs) on their roles by end November 2015

Hydrogeological surveys for water projects have been completed in all VMG areas in the 5 counties by January 2016

At least 10 CS projects completed by end of project (EoP)

Milestones VMGP has been disclosed to

all 5 county governments by end October, 2015 and to all participating villages by end November, 2015 county

MoUs for involvement of county governments in project implementation and sustainability of CS projects have been signed with at least 3 of the 5 county governments by end November, 2015 and by all county governments by end of January, 2016

10 VMGDCs and at least 60 PICs have been established and trained on their roles by mid-December, 2015 and all PICs established and trained by end January, 2016

Contracts have been awarded and CS project sites have been handed over to contractors by end January, 2016

At least 90% of CS projects have been completed by end June, 2016 and 100% by end July, 2016

At least 70% of county governments have been sensitized to include the

and reports tender

documents

contract documents

disclosure reports or minutes of disclosure meetings

End of project completion reports



comprehensive VMGP in their budgets by April, 2016

Hydrogeological survey has been completed in at least 70% of the 10 VMG communities in the 5 counties by July, 2016

B. Livelihood micro-projectsImplementation of livelihood micro-projects: local goats; local poultry; beekeeping; fishing activities; agriculture related activities and services; small scale enterprises, eco-tourism and cultural centers Issues

Many VMGs, including women, youth and people living with disabilities are unable to provide for their basic needs due to poverty and developmental neglect and exclusion by successive post-colonial Kenyan governments

To enable VMGs put food on the table and money the pocket in the short to medium term basis

To provide alternative livelihood strategies to VMGs and enablwe them to diversify their sources of income

To equip VMGs with skills and capacity to implement and sustain their livelihoods strategies

To lay a foundation to the self-sufficiency and self-reliance by VMGs

To support VMGs in the conservation and promotion of their cultural activities for income and posterity

Establishment and training of village level project implementation committees

Establishment and training of micro-project implementation committees and groups

Agreement on technical support arrangements by the CTST and the PTT

Identification of individual households and groups that are to benefit from each category of micro-project

To implement livelihood projects

Note: VMGs have to be sensitized to understand that a household may only benefit from one category of livelihood project.while a village may only benefit from a maximum of 3 CL projects

Indicators 73 Project Implementation

Committee (PICs) established and trained on their roles by December 2015

At least 109 CIGs established and sensitized on their roles by December 2015 and all 219 by February 2016

Number2 of households from VMG villages supported to undertake livelihood micro-projects

219 community livelihood (CL) projects started (disaggregated by type) by April 2016

Milestones 3 high impact livelihood

projects have been prioritized by each VMG village by Mid November 2015

CIGs have been established for each of the 3 projects in each village by mid-November, 2015

Capacity building needs for CIGs and PICs have been identified in relation to each of the 3 projects by end November, 2015

Training/capacity building experts have been engaged and training modules prepared by mid-December, 2015

Training on livelihoods (including small scale enterprises if any) has been completed in at least 50% of participating villages by end February 2015, and in 90% of the villages by end April, 2015

At least 70% of the CL projects have been implemented by end April, 2015, and 100% by end,

Monthly monitoring and progress reports by KCDP, CTCs, VMGDCs and PICs

Training needs assessment reports

Training manuals and reports

End of project completion reports

2This indicator will be defined by KCDP after the village forums when the number of households in each village will have been knownVMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page 38


July, 2015 Number of households from

VMG villages that have been supported to participate in the CIGs for the 3 livelihood projects in each village

Number of livelihood projects that have been implemented and disaggregated by type

Number of households generating at least $50 or more from KCDP supported livelihoods projects

Grievance Redress MechanismImplementation of the agreed GRM

IssueConflicts are like to occur among VMGs in the course of livelihood micro-project implementation

To ensure that small conflicts, disputes or disagreements do not escalate to become big grievances that may be too difficult for the agreed GCHM to deal with

Sensitization of VMGs at all levels on the agreed GRM and soliciting their support for the same

10 community level GRM institutions established and trained / sensitized on their roles by January 2016

Milestones All 10 community level GRM

institutions have been confirmed and sensitized on the VMGs and their roles in its success by January, 2016

At least 80% of VMG communities and villages have been sensitized on the agreed GRMs by end February 2015

At least 70% of VMGs and community level institutions are reporting complaints to the agreed level of the GRM

At least 60% of reported complaints are being resolved at the lowest level of the GRM

Minutes of sensitization meetings

Complaints log book

Complaints resolution reports



Annexes

Annex 1: The Comprehensive VMGP andCost Estimates

Following the conclusion of the SA and the validation of its findings, a comprehensive VMGP that presents priority projects as defined by VMGs was developed during four sessions of three days each. It is the result of team work among the VMGs, the county government experts and KCDP technical experts. In order to develop the VMGPs, the VMGs first worked in their village groups to identify and prioritize their needs and aspirations. In this regard, each set of VMG village representatives - composed of representatives of the youth, female headed households, women, people living with disabilities, men, council of elders, special interest groups such as CBOs and headman – undertook their own village level identification and prioritization of micro projects. Consultations by village groups were facilitated by KCDP County Liaison Officers, Component Managers and Technical Coordinators. Similarly, respective county government experts lent support to the planning process.

It is on the basis thiscomprehensive VMGP that KCDP arrived at the 10 CS and 219 CLprojects that it intends to support in the remaining timeframe of the project.This Annex presents the detailed VMG plans that represent their aspirations and vision for lifting themselves out of poverty and bringing them to per with the rest of the communities in the coast of Kenya. It also presents a summary and detailed cost estimates for financing all priority micro-projects proposed by the VMGs.

Majority of the projects proposed in this comprehensive VMGP are in line with the spirit of the county development agenda as reflected in the respective County Integrated Development Plans (CIDP). They also resonate well with the vision 2030 of the Government of Kenya. If included in the county and national governments’ (and other actors) development agenda and implemented as proposed, the projects are capable of fast tracking the inclusion and integration of the VMGs into the mainstream social and economic life of Kenya as envisaged by article 56 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, whose realization is the mandate of county governments. It is also a reflection of the social, economic, livelihoods and demographic profiles of the VMGs as presented in the SA report.

Summary cost estimate for financing community service and livelihood projects1 Total Estimated Cost for all Livelihood Micro-Projects for VMGs in the KCDP Area 926,973,4702 Total Estimated Cost for all Community Service Projects for VMGs in KCDP Area 3,087,008,700Total Estimate Cost for Financing the VMGP (in KES) 4,013,982,170

Break down of cost estimates for community service project No Project category Cost Estimate Grand total of

cost estimates1. Education sector projects for all VMGs communities 1,847,680,6002. Health and sector projects for all VMG communities 379,696,2003. Public sanitation sector project for all VMG communities 7,800,0004. Water sector projects for all VMG communities 847,493,5005. Infrastructure support (repair of a bridge) for Bombi village in Kilifi

County4,338,400

6. Total Estimated Cost for financing CSPs for VMGs in KCDP Area 3,087,008,700



Breakdown of cost estimates for community livelihoods projects by communityNo Community/County Cost Estimate Grand total of

cost estimates1. Munyoyaya of Tana River County 237,768,6002. Waata of Tana River County 77,350,1003. WaIlwana of Tana River County 224,399,4504. Waata of Kilifi County 8,299,0005. Waata of Kwale County 12,660,9206. Wakifundi of Kwale County 2,807,5007. Wachwaka of Kwale County 2,867,4008. Waata of Taita Taveta County 5,471,1009. Aweer of Lamu County 3,997,80010. Saanye of Lamu County 50,486,96011. Joint activities: WaIlwana and Waata of Tana River County 217,464,19012. Joint activities: Wakifundi, Waata and Wachwaka of Kilifi, Kwale

and Taita Taveta counties53,414,690

13. Joint activities: Aweer and Sanye of Lamu County 29,985,760Total Estimate cost for financing livelihood micro-projects for VMGs in the KCDP Area

926,973,470

Below are the detailed cost estimates by project category and by the respective VMGs communities.

A. Category: Education

A1: Education Projects for the Munyoyaya VMG Community of Tana River County

NoActivities/Sub-Activities

No. of Units

No. of Villages Quantity Unit Cost Total Remarks

1 Nursery schools

Targeted Villages Hadhama, Qurulicha, Boji, Masugudha and Bulaqumudhu

Classrooms 3 5 15 1,000,000 15,000,000

Desks 42 5 210 700.

00 147,000 Tables - Teachers 3 5 15 2,500 37,500 Chairs - Teachers 3 5 15 1,500 22,500 Toilets - students 2 5 10 150,000 1,500,000 Toilets - staff 1 5 5 150,000 750,000 Water tanks 2 5 10 300,000 3,000,000 Fencing 1 5 5 1,500,000 7,500,000 Kitchen 1 5 5 300,000 1,500,000

Staff 0 0

County Government is responsible for providing ECD staff

Sub-total 29,457,000

2 Primary Schools Targeted Villages Hadhama and BulaqumudhuClassrooms 9 2 18 1,000,000 18,000,000 Note:

1. A primary school ordinarily has 8 classrooms. So it is assumed that the 9th ‘classroom’ will be a staff

Desks 160 4 640 700 448,000 Tables - Teachers 8 4 32 2,500 80,000 Staff tables 6 4 24 2,500 60,000 Chairs - Teachers 16 4 64 1,500 96,000 Toilets - students 4 2 8 150,000 1,200,000



Toilets - staff 2 2 4 150,000 600,000 Water tanks 6 2 12 300,000 3,600,000 Fencing 1 2 2 1,500,000 3,000,000 Kitchen 2 2 4 300,000 1,200,000


3

Primary school with Boarding Facilities Target Village: Konoramadha

Dormitory 2 1 2 5,000,000 10,000,000 1. Boarding facilities will enable girls and boys to remain in school during migration in search of water and pasture during droughts

2. Note that (a) beds and beddings not included in budget; (b) Dining Hall equipment and furniture not budgeted for

Dining hall 1 2 2 3,000,000 6,000,000 Staff houses 2 2 4 2,000,000 8,000,0000


4Secondary schools 1 Target Village: KonoramadhaClassrooms 5 1 5 1,000,000 5,000,000

Laboratory 1 1 1 1,500,000 1,500,000

Administration/ staffroom block 1 1 1 4,000,000 4,000,000

Lockers 40 4 160 4,500 720,000 Chairs 40 4 160 1,500 240,000 Stools 40 4 160 1,000 160,000 Tables 13 1 13 2,500 32,500 Toilets -staff 2 1 2 150,000 300,000 Toilets - students 6 1 6 150,000 900,000 Water tanks 6 1 6 300,000 1,800,000 Dining hall 1 1 1 3,000,000 3,000,000 Kitchen 1 1 1 300,000 300,000 Fencing 1 1 1 1,500,000 1,500,000 Dormitory 2 1 2 2,600,000 5,200,000 To facilitate boarding for girls

at Konoramadha sec. school Staff houses 2 1 2 2,000,000 4,000,000 Solar panels 0 Needs a visit to the dealers


5Vocational Training Centre

Polytechnics

There are existing polytechnics at Madogo and Hola which should serve the county adequately

Sub-total for education projects for the Munyoyaya VMGs of Tana River County 110,393,500

A2: Education Projects for the Waata Community of Tana River County1 Nursery schools

Target Villages: Gora, Bili, Dhida, Hamesa Classrooms 3 4 11* 1,000.000 12,000,000 If project can only support 1

ECD school, it should be at Gora

*Hamesa already has 1 classroom but needs 2 more classrooms

Desks 42 4 168 700 117,600 Teachers tables 3 4 12 2,500 30,000.00 Teachers Chairs 3 4 12 1,500 9,000 Students toilets 2 4 8 150,000 1,200.000 Staff toilets 1 4 4 150,000 600,000 Water tanks 2 4 8 300,000 2,400,000

Fencing 1 4 4 1,500,000 6,000,000



Kitchen 1 4 4 300,000 1,200,000 Staff 0 Sub-total 22,334,8002 Primary Schools Targeted Villages: Hamesa

Classrooms 9 1 9 1,000.000.00 9,000,000 Note: This school was added

to the list during the plenary session on Day 3 of session 2

A primary school ordinarily has 8 classrooms. So it is assumed that the 9th ‘classroom’ will act as staffroom

Desks 160 1 160 700.00 112,000 Tables - Teachers 8 1 8 2,500.00 20,000 Staff tables 6 1 6 2,500.00 15,000 Chairs - Teachers 16 1 16 1,500.00 24,000 Toilets - students 4 1 4 150,000.00 600,000 Toilets - staff 2 1 2 150,000.00 300,000 Water tanks 6 1 6 300,000.00 1,800,000 Fencing 1 1 1 1,500,000.00 1,500,000

Kitchen 1 1 1 300,000.00 300,000Sub-total 13,671,000Sub-total for the education for the Waata VMGs of Tana River County 36,005,800

A3: Education Projects for the Wallwana VMG Community of Tana River County


No. of Units

No. of Villages

Quantity Unit Cost Total Remarks

1 Nursery schools for the WaIlwana VMG Community of Tana River County

Target Villages: Jarha, Tune, Chewele, Shikadabu, Shuqule, Dabholo, Bale Classrooms 3 7 21 1,000.000 21,000,000 Desks 42 7 294 700 205,800 Teachers tables 3 7 21 2,500 52,500 Teachers chairs 3 7 21 1,500 31,500 Students toilets 2 7 14 15,000 210,000 Staff toilets 1 7 7 15,000 105,000 Water tanks 2 7 14 300,000 4,200,000 Fencing 1 7 7 1,500,000 10,500,000 Kitchen 1 7 7 300,000 2,100,000 Staff 0 County Government Sub-total 38,404,800

2Primary Schools Targeted Villages: Chewele, Vango and ShikadabuClassrooms 9 3 27 1,000.000 27,000,000

Desks 160 3 480 700 336,000 Teachers tables 8 3 24 2,500 60,000 Staff tables 6 3 18 2,500 45,000 Teachers chairs 16 3 48 1,500 72,000 Students toilets 4 3 12 150,000 1,800,000 Staff toilets 2 3 6 150,000 900,000 Water tanks 6 3 18 300,000 5,400,000 Fencing 1 3 3 1,500,000 4,500,000

Kitchen 1 3 3 300,0000 900,000

Boarding facility at Shikadabu Primary School 0 0 Dormitories 2 1 2 500,000 10,000,000

Dining Hall 1 1 1 300,000 300,000Staff houses 2 1 2 2,000,000 4,000,000

55,313,0003 Secondary

schools Target Village: Chewele and Nanighi

Classrooms 5 2 10 1,000,000 10,000

A standard secondary school normally has 4 classrooms. It is therefore assumed that the 5th “classroom” will be converted into staffroom



Laboratory 1 2 2 1,500,000 3,000,000 Administration / staffroom block 1 2 2 4,000,000 8,000,000Lockers 40* 8* 320 4,500 1,440,000 *40

lockers/classroomX4classrooms/villageX2 villages

Chairs 40* 8* 320 1,500 480,000Stools 40* 8* 320 1,000 320,000Tables 13 2 26 2,500 65,000 staff toilets 2 2 4 150,000 600,000 Students toilets 6 2 12 150,000 1,800,000 Water tanks 6 2 12 300,000 3,600,000 Dining hall 1 2 2 3,000,000 6,000,000 Kitchen 1 2 2 3,000,000 6,000,000 Fencing 1 2 2 1,500,000 3,000,000Dormitory 2 2 4 2,600,000 10,400,000Staff houses 2 2 4 2,000,000 8,000,000Solar panels 0 Needs a visit tom the dealersSub-totals 52,715,000

4 Vocational Training/Polytechnics: Upgrading of existing polytechnic in BuraTargeted Villages

Target Villages: Nanighi, Shikadabu, Gubato, Ghaigopa, Shuqule

Dormitory 2 1 2 2,600,0000 5,200,000 While each of the 6 villages prioritized vocational training centres, it was agreed during group planning sessions and in plenary that such centres, just as primary boarding and secondary schools as well as teachers colleges, could not be built in each village as there would not be adequate students to populate and fully utilize them. It was therefore agreed that there was a need to upgrade/improve the existing vocational training centre/polytechnic at Bura

Fencing 1 1 1 1,500,0000 1,500,000 Water tanks 6 1 6 300,000 1,800,000 Kitchen 1 1 1 1,000,000 1,000,000 Dining hall 1 1 1 3,000,000 3,000,000 Solar panels 1 1 1 2,500,000 2,500,000 Library 1 1 1 3,000,000 3,000,000

Staff houses 2

1

2 2,000,000 4,000,000 Sub-total 22,000,000 5 Teachers Training College

Targeted Villages Target Villages: Bula Baraka

Dormitory 4 1 4 5,000,000 20,000,000

Lecture Halls 12 1 12 3,000,000 36,000,000 Kitchen 1 1 1 6,000,000 6,000,000 Staff room 1 1 1 1,500,000 1,500,000 Laboratories 4 1 4 8,000,000 32,000,000 Dining hall 1 1 1 4,000,000 4,000,000 Library 1 1 1 5,000,000 5,000,000

Sport infrastructure/ 1 1 1 9,000,000 9,000,000

Administration block 1 1 1 4,000,000 4,000,000 Solar panels 1 1 1 8,000,000 8,000,000

Scholarships 0 0 0 0 0

According to need and level of education/training requested for

Sub-total 125,500,000Sub-total for the education sector for the WaIlwana VMG community of Tana River county 293,932,800



A4: Education Sector Projects for the Waata VMG Community of Kwale County1 Modern Nursery schools for the Waata VMG Community of Kwale County

Target Villages: Kikobeni, Kilibasi, Shirango (B) Classrooms 3 3 9 1,200,000 10,800,000

Hexagonal table for pupils(mvule) 21

3 6318,650 1,174,950

Arts and play equipment (swings, slides, monkey hoops, beam balance and tunnel) 5

3 15

250,000 3,750,000 Plastic chairs 126 3 378 450 170,100 Teachers tables 3 3 9 2,500 22,500 Teachers chairs 3 3 9 1,500 13,500 Students toilets 2 3 6 850,000 5,100,000 Staff toilets 1 3 3 450,000 1,350,000 Water tanks 2 3 6 300,000 900,000 Fencing 1 3 3 1,500,000 4,500,000 Kitchen 1 3 3 300,000 900,000

Teacher preparation room/store 1

3 31,000,000 3,000,000

31,681,0502 Primary schools for the Waata VMG Community of Kwale County

Target Villages: Kikobeni, Shirango (B) 8 Classroom block 8 2 16 1,200,000 19,200,000 Administration Block 1 2 2 5,200,000 10,400,000 Toilets - students 1 2 2 850,000 1,700,000 Desks 120 2 240 2,500 600,000 Tables - Teachers 8 2 16 2,500 40,000 Staff tables 6 2 12 2,500 30,000 Chairs - Teachers 16 2 32 1,500 48,000 Water tanks 6 2 12 300,000 3,600,000 Fencing 1 2 2 1,500,000 3,000,000 Kitchen 1 2 2 300,000 600,000

Dining hall 1 2 2 3,000,000 6,000,000Sub-total 45,218,000Sub-total for education sector for Waata VMGs of Kwale County 76,899,050

A5: Education Sector Projects for the Wakifundi VMG Community of Kwale County1 Modern Nursery schools for the Wakifundi VMG Community of Kwale County

Target Villages: Shimoni (Shangai, Anzwani) Classrooms 3 1 3 1,200,000 3,600,000


1 21 18,650 391,650


1

5 250,000 1,250,000 Plastic chairs 126 1 126 450 56,700.00 Teachers tables 3 1 3 2,500 7,500 Teachers chairs 3 1 3 1,500 4,500 Students toilets 2 1 2 850,000 1,700,000 staff toilets 1 1 1 450,000 450,000 Water tanks 2 1 2 300,000 600,000 Fencing 1 1 1 1,500,000 4,500,000 Kitchen 1 1 1 300,000 300,000



Preparation room &store for teachers 1

11 1,000,000 3,000,000

Sub-total 15,860,3502 Vocational training centre for the Wakifundi of Kwale County

Target Villages: Shimoni (Shangai, Anzwani)

Twin workshops with 3-doors toilet 2 1 2 5,300,000 10,600,000

Administration block 1

11 5,200,000 5,200,000

Shades 2 1 2 1,000,000 2,000.000 8 Classrooms block 1 1 1 9,600,000 9,600,000 Dormitory (cubical) 2 1 2 4,000,000 8,000,000 Fencing 1 1 1 1,500,000 1,500,000 Water tanks 6 1 6 300,000 1,800,000 Kitchen 1 1 1 1,000,000 1,000,000 Dining hall 1 1 1 3,000,000 3,000,000 Staff houses 2 1 2 2,000,000 4,000,000 College chairs 360 1 360 3,500 1,260,000

Tools and equipment for 8 trades 1

11 17,227,000 17,227,000

63,189,000Sub-total for education sector for the Wakifunidi VMGs of Kwale county 79,049,350

A6: Education Sector Projects for the Wachwaka VMG Community of Kwale County1 Improvement of Secondary school

Target Villages: Fikirini

Administration Block and Staff Room 1 1 1 5,200,000 5,200,000

The school was not named (so it is assumed to be Fikirini Secondary schoolAlso, the block has not been broken down into units but it is assumed it will have HM’s office Deputy HM’s office, staff room and reception/Secretaries office

Sub-total 5,200,0002 Vocational training centre

Target Villages: Fikirini



11 5,200,000 5,200,000

Shades 2 1 2 1,000,000 2,000.000

8 Classrooms block 1

11 9,600,000 9,600,000

Dormitory cubical type 2

12 4,000,000 8,000,000

Fencing 1 1 1 1,500,000 1,500,000 Water tanks 6 1 6 300,000 1,800,000 Kitchen 1 1 1 1,000,000 1,000,000 Dining hall 1 1 1 3,000,000 3,000,000 Staff houses 2 1 2 2,000,000 4,000,000 College chairs 360 1 360 3,500 1,260,000

Tools and equipment (8 trades) 1

1

1 17,227,000 17,227,000.00Sub-total 63,189,000.00



Sub-total for education sector for the WachwakaVMGs of Kwale County 68,389,000

A7: Education Sector Projects for Waata of Kilifi County1 Modern Nursery schools for the Waata VMG Community of Kilifi County

Target Villages: Mabuani, Bombi, Chamari Classrooms 3 3 9 1,200,000 10,800,000


3 6318,650 1,174,950


3 15

250,000 3,750,000 Plastic chairs 126 3 378 450 170,100 Teachers tables 3 3 9 2,500 22,500 Teachers chairs 3 3 9 1,500 13,500 Students toilets 2 3 6 850,000 5,100,000 Staff toilets 1 3 3 450,000 1,350,000 Water tanks 2 3 6 300,000 900,000 Fencing 1 3 3 1,500,000 4,500,000 Kitchen 1 3 3 300,000 900,000

Teacher preparation room & store 1

3 3

1,000,000 3,000,000sub-total 31,681,050

2 Primary schools for the Waata VMG Community of Kilifi CountyTarget Villages: Bombi and Mabuani

8 Classroom block 8 2 16 1,200,000.00 19,200,000 Administration Block 1 2 2 5,200,000.00 10,400,000 Toilets - students 1 2 2 850,000 1,700,000 Desks 120 2 240 2,500 600,000 Tables - Teachers 8 2 16 2,500 40,000 Staff tables 6 2 12 2,500 30,000 Chairs - Teachers 16 2 32 1,500 48,000 Water tanks 6 2 12 300,000 3,600,000 Fencing 1 2 2 1,500,000 3,000,000 Kitchen 1 2 2 300,000 600,000

Dining hall 1 2 2 3,000,000 6,000,000Sub-total 45,218,000

3 Vocational training Centre for the Waata VMGs of Kilifi CountyTarget Villages: Chamari, Majaoni, Barakachembe


The feasibility of having 3 vocational training centres in one county needs to be confirmed with the relevant authorities

Administration block 1 3 3 5,200,000 15,600,000 Shades 2 3 6 1,000,000 6,000,000 8 Classrooms block 1 3 3 9,600,000 28,800,000 Dormitory cubical type 2 3 6 4,000,000 24,000,000 Fencing 1 3 3 1,500,000 4,500,000 Water tanks 6 3 18 300,000 5,400,000 Kitchen 1 3 3 1,000,000 3,000,000 Dining hall 1 3 3 3,000,000 9,000,000 Staff houses 2 3 6 2,000,000 12,000,000

College chairs 360 3 1,01

0 3,500 3,535,000Tools and equipment (8 trades) 1

33 17,227,000 51,681,000

Sub-total 195,316,000Sub-total for education sector for the Waata of Kilifi County 269,218,050



A8: Education Sector Projects for the Waata VMG Community of Taita Taveta County1 Modern Nursery schools for the Waata VMG Community of Taita Taveta County

Target Villages: Birikani, Kajire and Kisimeni Classrooms 3 3 9 1,200,000 10,800,000

Hexagonal table for pupils (mvule) 21

363 18,650 1,174,950


3

15 250,000 3,750,000 Plastic chairs 126 3 378 450 170,100 Teachers tables 3 3 9 2,500 22,500 Teachers chairs 3 3 9 1,500 13,500 Students toilets 2 3 6 850,000 5,100,000 Staff Toilets 1 3 3 450,000 1,350,000 Water tanks 2 3 6 300,000 1,800,000.00 Fencing 1 3 3 1,500,000 4,500,000 Kitchen 1 3 3 300,000 900,000

Teacher preparation room & store 1

33 1,000,000 3,000,000

Sub-total 32,581,0502 Vocational training Centre for the Waata VMGs of Taita Taveta County

Target Villages: Kisimeni, Bondeni and Birikani


The feasibility of having 3 vocational training centres in one county needs to be confirmed with the relevant authorities


33 5,200,000 15,600,000

Shades 2 3 6 1,000,000 6,000,000 8 Classrooms block 1 3 3 9,600,000 28,800,000

Dormitory cubical type 2

36 4,000,000 24,000,000

Fencing 1 3 3 1,500,000 4,500,000 Water tanks 6 3 18 300,000 5,400,000 Kitchen 1 3 3 1,000,000 3,000,000 Dining hall 1 3 3 3,000,000 9,000,000 Staff houses 2 3 6 2,000,000 12,000,000 College chairs 360 3 1,010 3,500 3,535,000

Tools and equipment (8 trades) 1

3

3 17,227,000 51,681,000Sub-total 195,316,000Sub-total for education sector for the Waata VMG community of Taita Taveta County

227,897,050

A9: Education Sector Projects for the Aweer and Sanye VMG Community of Lamu County1 Modern Nursery school construction for the Aweer Community of Lamu County

Target villages Madinah, Kiangwi, Bargoni, Kwadae Classrooms 3 4 10 2,000,000 20,000,000 Note that totals have

been calculated based on the quantity and unit costs, (and not number of villages or number of units)

Desks 20 4 80 4,000 320,000 Teachers tables 1 4 10 13,000 130,000 Teachers chairs 1 4 10 3,500 35,000 Students toilets 2 4 8 850,000 6,800,000 Staff toilets 2 4 8 450,000 3,600,000 Water tanks 2 4 8 350,000 2,800,000 Kitchen 1 4 8 500,000 2000,000 Sub-Total Nursery 35,685,000

2 Primary School Construction for the Aweer and Sanye VMG Communities of Lamu



County Target Village Madinah, Basuba, Kiangwi, Shekale, Milimani and Bahati Njema,

Pandanguo Classroom block 22 7 22 2,000,000 44,000,000 Administration

Block1 7 2 4,500,000 9,000,000

Students toilets 2 7 14 850,000 11,900,000 Desks 20 7 440 4,000 1,760,000 Teachers tables 22 7 22 13,000 286,000 Staff tables 4 7 28 10,000 280,000 Teachers chairs 22 7 154 3500 539,000 Water tanks 7 7 49 350,000 17,150,000

Fencing (Bargoni and Pandanguo)

2 2 4 2,000,000 8,000,000

Kitchen 1 7 7 500,000 3,500,000 Dining hall 1 7 7 4,000,000 28,000,000 Staff House(Basuba) 2 1 2 2,000,000 4,000,000

Sub-Total Primary School 128,415,0003 Vocational Training/Polytechnics

Target Village Bargoni

Twin workshops with 3-doors toilet

2 1 16 5,300,000 84,800,000 Total calculations are based on unit costs and quantity (and not on number of units And number of villages)

Administration block 1 1 8 5,200,000 41,600,000

Shades 2 1 16 1,000,000 16,000,000

8 Classrooms block 1 1 8 9,600,000 76,800,000

Dormitory cubical type

2 1 16 4,000,000 64000000

Fencing 1 1 8 1,500,000 12000000

Water tanks 6 1 48 300,000 14400000

Kitchen 1 1 8 1,000,000 8000000

Dining hall 1 1 8 3,000,000 24000000

Staff houses 2 1 16 2,000,000 32000000

College chairs 360 1 2880 3,500 10,080,000

Tools and equipment (8 trades)

1 1 8 17,227,000 137,816,000

Power set 1 1 1 300,000 300,000

Total vocational training centres/Polytechnic 521,796,000

Sub-totals for education sector for Aweer and Sanye VMG communities of Lamu County

685,896,000

Grand Total for Education Projects for All VMG Communities 1,847,680,600



B. Health

B1: Health Sector Projects for the Munyoyaya VMG Community of Tana River County

No Activities/Sub-ActivitiesNo. of Units

No. of Villages Quantity

Unit Cost Total Remarks

1 Dispensary construction for the Munyoyaya VMG Community

Targeted Villages Dirisa and HadhamaIncinerators 1 2 2 2,500,000 5,000,000 Sanitary Facility -VIPs (2 doors)

1 2 2 650,000 1,300,000

Building 3 rooms (39 x 13 ft.)

1 2 2 3,000,000 6,000,000

Equipment for dispensary for the Munyoyaya VMG Community 0Examination Couches 2 2 4 4,000 16,000 Autoclaves 2 2 4 5,000 20,000 Sterilizers 1 2 2 5,000 10,000 Stethoscopes 1 2 2 800 1,600 Tables 1 2 2 12,000 24,000 Chairs 3 2 6 1,000 6,000 Screens 3 2 6 3,000 18,000 Vestry beds 1 2 2 5,000 10,000 Injections (Assorted) 1 2 2 4,000 8,000 BP Machines 1 2 2 6,000 12,000 Cupboards 1 2 2 10,000 20,000 Safe cabinets (Medicine) 1 2 2 10,000 20,00

0 Kidney dishes 1 2 2 5,000 10,000 Scissors (Assorted) 1 2 2 8,000 16,000 Thermometers (Assorted) 1 2 2 5,000 10,000 Tape measures 1 2 2 1,000 2,000 Tweezers 1 2 2 5,000 10,000 Weighing machines 2 2 4 8,000 32,000 Oscilloscopes 2 2 4 10,000 40,000 Refrigerator 1 2 2 20,000 40,000 Safety boxes 1 2 2 10,000 20,000 Gas cylinders 2 2 4 10,000 40,000 Contingency 1 2 2 100,000 200,000 Referral System (Phone) 1 2 2 40,000 80,000Sub-Totals 12,965,600

2 Maternity Wing construction for the Munyoyaya VMG CommunityTarget Villages Dirisa, Hadhama and Boji

Building 4 rooms (52 x13 ft.) 1 3 3 3,500,000 10,500,000 Placenta pit 1 3 3 150,000 450,00

0 Water reservoir -Ferro-cement 50,000ltrs

1 3 3 1,200,000 3,600,000

Equipment (Delivery coaches, Baby cots, Oxygen Cylinders, Linen, Thermometers, Cleaning equipment’s, Green Towels, Weighing Machines, Sucker, Delivery set)

1 3 3 2,000,000 6,000,000

Sub-Total Maternity wing 20,550,0003 Staff House for the Munyoyaya VMG Community Staffing is the

responsibility of the county government

Target Villages Dirisa, Hadhama and Boji Building (3 rooms) -37 X 8 ft. 1 3

3 500,000 1,500,000



Staff (2 Nurses, 1 Public health Officer and 1 Community Health Assistant)

0

4 Fencing of Health Facilities for the Munyoyaya VMG Community 0Dirisa, Hadhama and Boji 0Fence (chain link with Concrete posts)-2/4 acres

1 3 3

700,000 2,100,000

5 Lighting Health Facilities for the Munyoyaya VMG Community

0 0

Target Villages: Dirisa, Hadhama and Boji 0Solar Lighting 1 3

3 200,000 600,000

Sub-Total Lighting 4,200,000Sub-Total Costs of Health Projects for the Munyoyaya VMG community of Tana River County

37,715,600

B2: Health Sector Projects for the Waata VMG Community of Tana River County


No. of Villages

Quantity

Unit Cost Total

Remarks

1 Dispensary construction for the Waata VMG Community No village from the Waata community indicated that they needed a Maternity Facility

Targeted Villages Darime and GoraIncinerators 1 2 2 2,500,00

0 5,000,000

Sanitary Facility -VIPs (2 doors)

1 2 2 650,000

1,300,000


1 2 2 3,000,000

6,000,000

Equipment for dispensary for the Waata VMG Community 0 0Examination Couches 2 2 4 4,00

0 16,000

Autoclaves 2 2 4 5,000 20,000 Sterilisers 1 2 2 5,00

0 10,000

Stethoscopes 1 2 2 800

1,600

Tables 1 2 2 12,000

24,000

Chairs 3 2 6 1,000

6,000

Screens 3 2 6 3,000

18,000

Vestry beds 1 2 2 5,000

10,000

Injections (Assorted) 1 2 2 4,000

8,000

BP Machines 1 2 2 6,000

12,000

Cupboards 1 2 2 10,000 20,000 Safe cabinets (Medicine) 1 2 2 10,00

0 20,000

Kidney dishes 1 2 2 5,000

10,000

Scissors (Assorted) 1 2 2 8,000

16,000

Thermometers (Assorted) 1 2 2 5,000

10,000

Tape measures 1 2 2 1,000

2,000

Tweezers 1 2 2 5,00 10,000



0 Weighing machines 2 2 4 8,00

0 32,000

Oscilloscopes 2 2 4 10,000

40,000

Refrigerator 1 2 2 20,000 40,000 Safety boxes 1 2 2 10,00

0 20,000

Gas cylinders 2 2 4 10,000

40,000

Contingency 1 2 2 100,000

200,000

Referral System (Phone) 1 2 2 40,000 80,000Sub-Total 12,965,600

2 Staff House construction for the Waata VMG Community Staffing is the responsibility of the county government

Target Villages Darime and Gora Building (3 rooms) -37 X 8 ft.

1 2 2 500,000 1,000,000

Staff (2 Nurses per facility, 3 Public health Officers per location and 8 Community Health Assistants per sub location)

0

Sub-Total Staff House 1,000,0003 Fencing for Health Facilities for the Waata VMG Community

Target Villages Darime and GoraFence (chain link with Concrete posts)-2/4 acres

1 2 2 700,000 1,400,000

Sub-Total Fencing 1,400,0004 Lighting Health Facilities for the Waata VMG Community

Target Villages Darime and GoraSolar Lighting 1 2 2 200,000 400,00

0 Sub-Total Lighting 400,000Total Costs for Tana River Waata VMG community Health Projects 15,765,600

B3: Health Sector Projects for the WaIlwana VMG Community of Tana River County


No. of Units

No. of Villages Quantity Unit Cost Total

Remarks

1 Dispensary construction for the WaIlwana VMG Community Vango is 3km away from the closest health facility which is in Madogo, Kimilo is 1km away from the closest health facility which is in Sala (The Health facility at Sala has no staff so they have to go to Sombo which is 15 km away)and Shuqule is 0.5km away from the closest health facility which is in Bura East. County government should allocate staff to the Health Facility at Sala therefore, Vango, Kimilo and Shuqule have not been included in the list of villages that need a dispensary

Targeted Villages Tune, Chewele, ShiaAdobe, Mikomani, Dabolo, Ghamorori and Masibabu

Incinerators 1 7

7 2,500,000 17,500,000

Sanitary Facility -VIPs (2 doors)

1 7

7 650,000 4,550,000


1 7

7 3,000,000 21,000,000

Equipment for dispensary for the WaIlwana VMG Community

0 0

Examination Couches 2

7 14 4,000 56,000

Autoclaves 2

7 14 5,000 70,000

Sterilisers 1

7 7 5,000 35,000

Stethoscopes 1

7 7 800 5,600

Tables 1

7 7 12,000 252,000



Chairs 3

7 21 1,000 21,000

Screens 3

7 21 3,000 63,000

Vestry beds 1

7 7 5,000 35,000

Injections (Assorted) 1

7 7 4,000 28,000

BP Machines 1

7 7 6,000 42,000

Cupboards 1

7 7 10,000 70,000

Safe cabinets (Medicine) 1

7 7 10,000 70,000

Kidney dishes 1

7 7 5,000 35,000

Scissors (Assorted) 1

7 7 8,000 56,000

Thermometers (Assorted)

1

7 7 5,000 35,000

Tape measures 1

7 7 1,000 7,000

Tweezers 1

7 7 5,000 35,000

Weighing machines 2

7 14 8,000 112,000

Oscilloscopes 2 7 14 10,000 140,000 Refrigerator

1 7 7 20,000 140,00

0 Safety boxes

1 7 7 10,000 70,00

0 Gas cylinders

2 7 14 10,000 140,00

0 Contingency

1 7 7 100,000 700,000

Referral System (Phone) 1 7 7 40,000 280,000Sub-Total 45,547,600

2 Maternity Wing construction for the WaIlwana VMG Community Nanighi already has a dispensary and it is 3km away from Darba. Therefore, the maternity wing should be constructed at the dispensary in Nanighi.

Target Villages Nanighi, and DarbaBuilding 4 rooms (52 x13 ft.)

1 2 1 3,500,000 7,000,000

Placenta pit 1 2 1 150,000 300,000

Water reservoir -Ferro-cement 50,000ltrs

1 2 1 1,200,000 2,400,000


1 2 1 2,000,000 4,000,000

Sub-Total Maternity wing

13,700,000

3 Staff House construction for the WaIlwana VMG Community Staffing is the responsibility of the county government

Target Villages Nanighi, Darba, Tune, Chewele, ShiaAdobe, Mikomani, Dabolo, Ghamorori, Masibabu and Sombo

Building (3 rooms) -37 X 8 ft.

1 10 10 500,000 5,000,000



Staff (2 Nurses per facility, 3 Public health Officers per location and 8 Community Health Assistants per sub location)Sub-Total Staff House 5,000,000

4 Fencing for Health Facilities for the WaIlwana VMG Community


Fence (chain link with Concrete posts)-2/4 acres

1 10 10 700,000 7,000,000

Sub-Total Fencing 7,000,0005 Lighting Health Facilities for the WaIlwana VMG Community


Solar Lighting 1 10 10 200,000 2,000,000 Sub-Total Lighting 2,000,000Total Costs for Tana River WaiIwana VMG community Health Projects 73,247,600

B4: Health Sector Projects for the Wataa VMG Community of Taita Taveta CountyWaata of Taita Taveta County did not prioritize any Health

ProjectsThe Waata are the only VMGs in Taita Taveta County

B5: Health Sector Projects for the Wataa VMG Community of Kwale CountyNo.

Activities/Sub-Activities

No. of Units

No. of Villages Quantity Unit Cost Total

Remarks

1 Dispensary construction for the Waata VMG Community Only one Waata village in Kwale County wanted a dispensary

Targeted Village Shirango BIncinerators 1

1 1 2,500,000 2,500,00

0Sanitary Facility -VIPs (2 doors)

1 1

1 650,000 650,000


1 1

1 3,000,000 3,000,000

Equipment for dispensary for the Waata VMG Community 0Water Tank PVC (10 litres)

1 1 1 85,000 85,000

Examination Couches 1 1 1 4,000 4,000 Autoclaves 1 1 1 5,000 5,000 Sterilisers 1 1 1 5,000 5,000 Stethoscopes 1 1 1 800 800 Tables 1 1 1 12,000 12,000 Chairs 1 1 1 1,000 1,000 Screens 1 1 1 3,000 3,000 Vestry beds 1 1 1 5,000 5,000 Injections (Assorted) 1 1 1 4,000 4,000 BP Machines 1 1 1 6,000 6,000 Cupboards 1 1 1 10,000 10,000 Safe cabinets (Medicine) 1 1 1 10,000 10,000 Kidney dishes 1 1 1 5,000 5,000 Scissors (Assorted) 1 1 1 8,000 8,000 Thermometers (Assorted)

1 1 1 5,000 5,000

Tape measures 1 1 1 1,000 1,000 Tweezers 1 1 1 5,000 5,000 Weighing machines 1 1 1 8,000 8,000



Oscilloscopes 1 1 1 10,000 10,000 Refrigerator 1 1 1 20,000 20,000 Safety boxes 1 1 1 10,000 10,000 Gas cylinders 1 1 1 10,000 10,000 Contingency 1 1 1 100,000 100,000 Referral System (Phone) 1 1 1 40,000 40,000Sub-Total Equipment 6,522,800

2 Staff House construction for the Waata VMG Community Shirango B did not indicate that the need more staff for the Health Facility.Staffing is the responsibility of the county government

Target Villages Shirango B Building (3 rooms) -37 X 8 ft.

1 1 1 500,000 500,000

Staff (2 Nurses per facility, 3 Public health Officers per location and 8 Community Health Assistants per sub location)Sub-Total Staff House 500,000Sub-total Costs for Taita Taveta Waata VMG community Health Projects 7,022,800

B6: Health Sector Projects for the Wakifundi VMG Community of Kwale CountyWakifundi of Kwale County did not ask for any Health

ProjectsNote that the Wakifundi VMG community of Kwale County was represented by only one village (Shimoni Village)

B7: Health Sector Projects for the Wachwaka VMG Community of Kwale County1 Maternity Wing construction for the Wachwaka VMG Community Wachwaka VMG

Community of Kwale County was represented only by Fikirini village

Target Village FikiriniBuilding 4 rooms (52 x13 ft.)

1 1 1 3,500,000 3,500,000

Placenta pit 1 1 1 150,000 150,000 Delivery bed 1 1 1 500,000 500,000Water reservoir -Ferro-cement 50,000ltrs

1 1 1 1,200,000 1,200,000


1 1 1 2,000,000 2,000,000

Sub-Total Maternity wing 7,350,0002 Staff Allocation for the Wachwaka VMG Community Health Facility Staffing is the

responsibility of the county government.The Health officer indicated salaries as follows:Nurse:45,000 per month,Public Health officer:45,000 per month,Community Health Assistant:35,000 per month and Lab technologist:45,0

Target Villages FikiriniStaff (2 Nurses per facility, 3 Public health Officers per location, 8 Community Health Assistants per sub location and a Lab Technologist in Fikirini)

00

Sub-Total Staff House 00



00 per month3 Lighting Community Health Units for the Wachwaka VMG Community

Target Village FikiriniCommunity health Unit 1 1 1 1,000,000 1,000,000 Sub-Total Lighting 1,000,000

4 Fencing for Health Facilities for the Wachwaka VMG Community

Target Village FikiriniFence and gate 1 1 1 640,000 640,000 Sub-Total Fencing 640,000Total Costs of Health Projects for Wachwaka VMG community of Kwale County 8,990,000

B8: Health Sector Projects for the Waata VMG Community of Kilifi County


No. of Villages Qty Unit Cost Total

Remarks

1 Dispensary construction for the Waata VMG CommunityTargeted Villages Bombi and MabuaniIncinerators 1 2 2 2,500,000 5,000,00

0 Sanitary Facility -VIPs (2 doors)

1 2 2 650,000 1,300,000


1 2 2 3,000,000 6,000,000

Equipment for dispensary for the Waata VMG Community 0Water Tank PVC (10 litres) 1 1 1 85,000 85,000Examination Couches

2 2 4 4,000 16,00

0 Autoclaves

2 2 4 5,000 20,00

0 Sterilisers

1 2 2 5,000 10,00

0 Stethoscopes

1 2 2 800 1,60

0 Tables

1 2 2 12,000 24,00

0 Chairs

3 2 6 1,000 6,00

0 Screens

3 2 6 3,000 18,00

0 Vestry beds

1 2 2 5,000 10,00

0 Injections (Assorted)

1 2 2 4,000 8,00

0 BP Machines

1 2 2 6,000 12,00

0 Cupboards

1 2 2 10,000 20,00

0 Safe cabinets (Medicine)

1 2 2 10,000 20,00

0 Kidney dishes

1 2 2 5,000 10,00

0 Scissors (Assorted)

1 2 2 8,000 16,00

0 Thermometers (Assorted)

1 2 2 5,000 10,00

0 Tape measures

1 2 2 1,000 2,00

0 Tweezers

1 2 2 5,000 10,00

0 Weighing machines 2 4 8,000 32,00



2 0 Oscilloscopes

2 2 4 10,000 40,00

0 Refrigerator

1 2 2 20,000 40,000

Safety boxes 1

2 2 10,000 20,000

Gas cylinders 2

2 4 10,000 40,000

Contingency 1 2 2 100,000 200,000

Referral System (Phone) 1 2 2 40,000 80,000Sub-Total Equipment 13,050,600

2 Maternity Wing construction for the Wachwaka VMG CommunityTarget Villages Bombi, Mabuani and ChamariBuilding 4 rooms (52 x13 ft.)

1 3 3 3,500,000 10,500,000

Placenta pit 1 3 3 150,000 450,000 Delivery bed 1 3 3 500,000 1,500,000Water reservoir -Ferro-cement 50,000ltrs

1 3 3 1,200,000 3,600,000


1 3 3 2,000,000 6,000,000

Sub-Total Maternity wing 22,050,0003 Staff House construction for the Waata VMG Community Staffing is the

responsibility of the county government

Target Villages Bombi and Mabuani Building (3 rooms) -37 X 8 ft.

1 2 2 500,000 1,000,000

Staff (2 Nurses per facility, 3 Public health Officers per location and 8 Community Health Assistants per sub location)Sub-Total Staff House 1,000,000

4 Staff Allocation for the Waata VMG Community Health Facility The Health officer indicated salaries as follows:

Nurse:45,000 per month,

Public Health officer:45,000 per month, Community Health Assistant:35,000 per month and Lab technologist:45,000

Target Villages Chamari, Mabuani and BombiStaff (2 Nurses per facility, 3 Public health Officers per location, 8 Community Health Assistants per sub location and a Lab Technologist in Chamari, Mabuani and Bombi)

00

Sub-Total Staff House 00



per month5 Lighting of Community Health Units for the Waata VMG Community

Target Villages Mabuani,Bombi,Debase and ChamariCommunity health Unit 1 4 4 1,000,000 4,000,000 Sub-Total Lighting 4,000,000Total Costs of Health Projects for the Waata VMG community of Kilifi County

40,100,600

B9: Health Sector Projects for Aweer and Sanye VMG communities of Lamu CountyActivities / Sub-Activities Category No. Villages Qty Unit Cost Total Remarks

1 Construction & Equipping of Dispensaries for the Aweer Community of Lamu County Target villages Bargoni, Madina, Basuba, Kiangwe, Mararani and MilimaniBuilding 3 rooms (39 x 13 ft.)

C/Works 6 1 5,000,000 30,000,000

Incinerators C/Works 6 1 2,500,000 15,000,000Sanitary Facility -VIPs (2 doors)

C/Works 6 1 650,000 3,900,000

Equipment 0Examination Couches Goods 6 1 10,000 60,000Autoclaves Goods 6 1 10,000 60,000Sterilisers Goods 6 1 10,000 60,000Stethoscopes Goods 6 1 2,000 12,000Tables Goods 6 1 20,000 120,000Chairs Goods 6 1 4,000 24,000Screens Goods 6 1 6,000 36,000Vestry beds Goods 6 1 10,000 60,000Injections (Assorted) Goods 6 1 6,000 36,000BP Machines Goods 6 1 20,000 120,000Cupboards Goods 6 1 20,000 120,000Safe cabinets (Medicine) Goods 6 1 30,000 180,000Kidney dishes Goods 6 1 8,000 48,000Scissors (Assorted) Goods 6 1 8,000 48,000Thermometers (Assorted) Goods 6 1 10,000 60,000Tape measures Goods 6 1 1,000 6,000Tweezers Goods 6 1 5,000 30,000Weighing machines Goods 6 1 8,000 48,000Oscilloscopes Goods 6 1 10,000 60,000Refrigerator Goods 6 1 100,000 600,000Safety boxes Goods 6 1 10,000 60,000Gas cylinders Goods 6 1 15,000 90,000Contingency Goods 6 1 400,000 2,400,000Referral System (Phone) Goods 6 1 40,000 240,000Sub-Totals construction and equipment 53,478,000

2 Maternity Wing for the Sanye and Aweer Communities of Lamu County Target Villages Mangai, Panda Nguo, Bargoni, Madina, Basuba, Kiangwe,

Mararani and MilimaniNote that Mkunumbi village is the nearest centre for Wasanye and they chose to have the existing dispensary here renovated and supported with a lab, maternity and additional equipment.

Building 4 rooms (52 x13 ft.)

C/Works 8 1 4,000,000 32,000,000

Placenta pit C/Works 8 1 250,000 2,000,000

Water reservoir -Ferro-cement 50,000ltrs

C/Works 8 1 1,200,000 9,600,000

Equipment : Delivery coaches, Baby cots, Oxygen Cylinders, Linen, Thermometers, Cleaning equipment’s, Green Towels, Weighing, Machines, Sucker, Delivery set

8 1 2,000,000 16,000,000

Totals Maternity wing 59,600,000



3 Staff House and staffing levels for the Aweer and Sanye Communities of Lamu County Target Villages: Mangai, Mkomani, Bargoni, Madina, Basuba, Kiangwe, Mararani and Milimani

Building (3 rooms) -37 X 8 ft. C/Works 8 1 1,500,000 12,000,000 Staffing levels 0 Staffing is the

responsibility of 6the county government

2 Nurses 01 Public health Officer 01 Community Health Assistant 0Totals staff houses 12,000,000

4 Fencing Mkomani is a Bajuni Village close to Aweer

Target Villages: Mangai, Mkomani, Bargoni, Madina, Basuba, Kiangwe, Mararani and Milimani(Chain link with Concrete posts)-2/4 acres

C/Works 8 1 1,000,000 8,000,000

Totals Fencing 8,000,0005 Lighting for the Aweer Community of Lamu County

Target Villages: Mangai, Mkomani, Bargoni, Madina, Basuba, Kiangwe, Mararani and MilimaniSolar Lighting 8 1 400,000 3,200,

000 Totals Lighting 3,200,000

6 Laboratory construction and equipment for the Aweer Community of Lamu County Target Villages: Mangai, Mkomani, Bargoni, Madina, Basuba, Kiangwe, Mararani and MilimaniConstruction civil

works8 1 1,000,000 8,000,

000 Lab Equipment 0 0Microscope 8 1 150,000 1,200,

000 Autoclave 8 1 10,000 80,

000 Waste buckets 8 1 100,000 800,

000 Reagents (assorted) 8 1 200,000 1,600,

000 Stools 8 1 1,000 8,

000 Hematology analyzer 8 1 500,000 4,000,

000 Contingency 8 1 150,000 1,200,

000 Totals lab equipment 16,888,000

7 Mobile Clinic for Aweer and Sanye Communities of Lamu CountyTarget Villages All villages belonging to the two communitiesMobile clinic (fully equipped) 1 1 15,000,00

0 15,000

,000 The Mobile Clinic was targets pregnant women and immunization

Totals Mobile Clinic 15,000,0008 Renovation of Dispensary for the Aweer Community of Lamu County

Target Villages Panda Nguo, Mangai, MkunumbiRenovation civil

works3 1 5,000,000 15,000,000

Totals Renovation 15,000,000

Sub-Totals for Health Facilities for the Sanye and Aweer VMG Communities of Lamu County 196,854,000

Grand Total for Health Sector Projects for All VMG Communities 379,696,200

C. Public Sanitation Sub-SectorVMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page 59


C1: Public Sanitation for Munyoyaya of Tana River County1 Public Toilets for the Munyoyaya VMG Community The village

based toilets as proposed has been strongly disapproved by Public Health) UNLESS it is taken as business to ensure sustainability

Target Villages Mahtawabsesa, Lagbadana and Hadhama2 door pit latrines 1

3

3 600,00

0 1,800,000

Sub-Total Public Toilets 1,800,000

Total Costs for Munyoyaya VMG community Public Sanitation Projects 1,800,000

C2: Public Sanitation for Waata of Tana River County1 Public Toilets for the Waata VMG Community The village

based toilets as proposed has been strongly disapproved by Public Health department as it is difficult to maintain

Target Village Hamesa2 door pit latrines 1

1

1 600,00

0 600,000

Sub-Total Public Toilets

C3: Public Sanitation for Aweer Community of Tana River1 Public Toilets for the Aweer Community of Lamu County

Target Villages Mkunumbi, Mangai, Mkomani Bargoni, Madina, Basuba, Kiangwe, Mararani and Milimani

2 door pit latrines Civil works 9 1 600,000 5,400,000

Sub-Totals 5,400,000

Grand Total for Public Sanitation Projects for All VMGs 7,800,000



D. Water Sector

D1: Water projects for Munyoyaya VMG Community of Tana River CountyNo Activity/Sub-Activity Category Qty No. of

VillagesUnit Cost Total Remarks

1 Borehole DrillingTarget Villages: Hadhama, Korati, Mansghuda, Qurulicha, Konegudhunfa, Bulaqumudhu, Boji, Malkamansa, Fafbare, Matawaresesa, Lagbadana, KonoramadhaHydrogeological Survey and report for all Munyoyaya Villages

Consultancies

1 19 100,000

1,900,000

While only 12 villages named are targeted for borehole drilling, all 19+ Munyoyaya villages will be covered by the hydrogeological survey

Borehole Drilling (up to 200m and testing

Civil works

1 12 3,000,000

36,000,000

Borehole Equipping, fencing, solar panelling and water distribution (at least 2 kiosks per village for approved boreholes

Operations 1 12 5,000,000

60,000,000

Sub Total for Boreholes 97,900,0002 Shallow well Rehabilitation

Target Villages: Hadhama, Korati, Mansghuda, Qurulicha, Konegudhunfa, Bulaqumudhu, Boji, Malkamansa, Fafbare, Matawaresesa, Lagbadana, KonoramadhaStatus assessment of all non-functional shallow wells

Consultancies

12 15 66,000 990,000 While the number of targeted villages are 12, they have a total of 15 Shallow wells among them

Cleaning, deepening and equipping of shallow wells

Civil works

12 15 300,000 4,500,000

Sub - Total 5,490,0003a New Water Pan Construction

Target Villages: Qurulicha & MansughudaSurvey, BoQ and design Consultan

cies1 2 150,000 300,000

Construction with wash aspects Civil works

1 2 15,000,000 30,000,000

30,300,000 3b Rehabilitation of existing water pan

Target Villages: Qurulicha Physical assessment Consultan

cies1 1 100,000 100,000

Construction Civil works

1 1 5,000,000 5,000,000

5,100,000 4 Training

Training on water projects management: Operation and maintenance: 15 pax * 3 days *12 villages

Consultancies

1 12 70,000 840,000

Sub-total cost of water for the Munyoyaya VMG community of Tana River County 139,630,000D2: Water projects for Waata Community of Taita Taveta County1 Masonry Tank construction for the Waata VMG Community

Targeted Village: BirikaniConstruction of 200m3 masonry tank

1 1 3,500,000 3,500,000

Sub-Total Construction 3,500,0002 Water Pan construction for the Waata VMG Community



Targeted Village: BondeniConstruct 20000m3 water pan with silt trap

1 16,000,000 6,000,000

10000 litre Water tank, pump, cattle trough & fittings

1 1 490,

000 490,0

00 Fencing of 250m water pan perimeter with chain-link & concrete posts

1 1 1,000,

000 1,000,0

00 Soil erosion protection works(vetiver on water pan banks)

1 1 150,

000 150,0

00 Sub-Total Construction 7,640,000

3 Rock Catchment construction for the Waata VMG CommunityTargeted Village: Kajire

Survey and design1 1 200,

000 200,0

00 Supply and install 300m, 3" HDPE pipes

1 1600,000 600,000

Rock lining and intake works

1 1 1,000,000

1,000,000

Construct 200m3 masonry tank

1 1 3,500,000

3,500,000

Supply and install 1500m, 2" HDPE pipes

1 1 1,300,000

1,300,000

Sub-Total Construction 6,600,0004 Borehole construction for the Waata VMG Community

Targeted Village: Kisimeni

Hydrogeological survey1 1 50,

000 50,0

00

Drilling of 8" dia borehole1 1 2,500,

000 2,500,0

00Test-pumping and water quality test & analysis

1 1 100,000

100,000

Supply and install 10000 litre HDPE water tank on tank concrete tank tower

1 1 500,

000 500,0

00Supply and install submersible pump to borehole

1 1 1,100,000

1,100,000

construct pump house1 1 900,0

00 900,00

0

supply and install gen set & control panel

1 1 2,500,000 2,500,000

Sub-Total Construction 7,650,000Total Cost of Water Projects for the Waata VMG of Taita Taveta County 25,390,000

D3: Water projects for the Waata VMG Community of Kilifi County1 Borehole construction for the Waata VMG Community of Kilifi

Targeted Village: ChamariHydrogeological survey

1 1 50,000

50,000

Drilling of 8" dia borehole

1 1 2,500,000

2,500,000

Test-pumping and water quality test & analysis

1 1 100,0

00 100,0

00Supply and install 500,0 500,0



10000 litre HDPE water tank on tank concrete tank tower 1 1 00 00Supply and install submersible pump to borehole 1 1

1,100,000

1,100,000

construct pump house1 1 900,00

0 900,00

0 supply and install gen set & control panel 1 1

2,500,000

2,500,000

Sub-Total Construction 7,650,0002a Masonry Tank construction for the Waata VMG Community

Targeted Villages: Debase, Majaoni and Baraka ChembeConstruction of 50m3 masonry tank

1 3 1,500,000 4,500,000

Supply and install 300m, 2" HDPE pipe

1 3 300,000 900,000

Sub-Total Construction 5,400,0002b Masonry Tank construction for the Waata VMG Community

Targeted Village: MabuaniConstruct 100m3 masonry tank 1 1 2,300,000 2,300,000Supply and install 1500m, 2" HDPE pipe 1 1 1,500,000

1,500,000

Sub-Total Construction 3,800,0003 Water Pan construction for the Waata VMG Community

Targeted Village: Mitangani (Shirango A)Construct 20000m3 water pan with silt trap 1 1

6,000,000

6,000,000

10000 litre Water tank, pump, cattle trough & fittings

1 1 490,000

490,000

Fencing of 250m water pan perimeter with chain-link & concrete posts 1 1

1,000,000

1,000,000

Soil erosion protection works(vetiver on water pan banks) 1 1

150,000

150,000

Sub-Total Construction 7,640,000Total Costs for Water Projects by Waata VMG community from Kilifi County 24,490,000

D4: Water projects for Waata VMG Community of Kwale County1a Piped Water construction for the Waata VMG Community

Targeted Village: KikobeniConstruct standard water kiosk

1 1 300,000 300,000


1 1 1,500,000 1,500,000

Sub-Total Construction 1,800,0001b Piped Water construction for the Waata VMG Community

Targeted Village: LandiConstruct 100m3 masonry tank

1 1 2,300,000 2,300,000


1 1 1,500,000 1,500,000

Sub-Total Construction 3,800,0001c Piped Water construction for the Waata VMG Community

Targeted Village: KilibasiConstruct standard water kiosk

1 1 300,000 300,000



Supply and install 10,000m, 2" HDPE pipe

1 1 10,000,000 10,000,000

Sub-Total Construction 10,300,0001d Piped Water construction for the Waata VMG Community

Targeted Village: Shirango BConstruct standard water kiosk

1 1 300,000 300,000


1 1 5,000,000 5,000,000

Sub-Total Construction 5,300,000Total Costs for Water Projects by Waata VMG community from Kwale County 21,200,000

D5: Water projects for the Wachwaka VMG Community of Kwale County1 Water supply from Shallow Wells for the Wachwaka VMG Community

Targeted Village: FikiriniRehabilitate shallow wells to accommodate submersible pump 1 1

100,000

100,000Install 3-phase power supply 1 1

500,000

500,000

Supply and install submersible pump 1 1

1,100,000

1,100,000

Construct pump house 1 1 900,000 900,000 Test pumping 1 1 100,000 100,000Supply and install elevated steel tank, not exceeding 30m 1 1

2,500,000

2,500,000

Supply and install 6000m, 2" HDPE pipe 1 1

6,000,000

6,000,000

Sub-Total Construction

11,200,000

Sub-total water Projects for Wachwaka VMG community from Kwale County 11,200,000

D6: Water projects for the Wakifundi VMG Community of Kwale CountyThe Wakifundi VMG Community of Kwale County did not request for any water project

Note, however, that the Wakifundi community was represented by only one village (Shimoni). It is therefore possible that other Wakifundi community villages could prioritize water projects if given opportunity

D7&D8: Water projects for Waata and WaIlwana VMG Communities of Tana River County3

No Activity/Sub-Activity Category Qty No. of Villages

Unit Cost

Total Remarks

1 Borehole construction for the Waata and WaIlwana VMG Communities The survey will be undertaken in all the Waata and WaIlwana villages

Targeted Village Darime, Nanighi, Bula Baraka, Dhida, Gubatu, Jara, Kaza Moyo, Tune, Shukule, Sombo, Gora, ShiaAdobe, Bili, Masibabu, Ghamrori, Kimilo, Darba, Bale, Kyobe, Ghaigopa, Hamesa and Mikomani

Hydrogeological survey and Report covering all the Ilwana and Waatavillages

1 25 10,

000 2,500,00

0Borehole drilling and testing 1 13

3,000,000

39,000,000

Survey, Borehole equipping, fencing,

8,000,000 104,000,000

3 Budgeting for water projects for the Waata and WaIlwana VMG communities of Tana River County was combined for all villages of the two communities that prioritized water. Delineation by tribe will have to be done on the ground at the start of implementation when hydrogeological survey results are knownVMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page 64


solarpanelling and reticulation to 2no kiosks for approved bore holes

1 13

Sub-Total borehole survey and construction 145,500,0002 Shallow well rehabilitation projects for the Waata and WaIlwana VMG

Communities The villages were not

grouped into their various communities (Waata and WaIlwana). It is therefore difficult to divide the shallow well rehabilitation projects into the two communities of Waata and WaIlwana of Tana River

The proposed shallow well rehabilitation sites are 11 in the 9 villages of Waata and WaIlwana.

The actual number of sites for shallow well rehabilitation will be determined after the status assessment

It is assumed that 1 villager from each of the shallow well rehabilitation sites will accompany the experts during the assessment hence 1villager x 11 x 500

Targeted Villages Chewele, Dabolo, Darime, Dhida, Gubatu, Jara, Kaza Moyo, Tune and Shukule

Status assessment and comprehensive report of all non-functional shallow wells (4days x 3officers x 6000 +1villager x 11 x 500) 1 11 77,500 77,500Cleaning, Deepening and Equipping of Shallow wells 1 11 390,000 4,290,000

Sub-total shallow wells construction 4,367,5003 Water Pan construction projects for the Waata VMG Communities

Targeted Village BiliSurvey, Design and BOQs 1 1 150,000 150,000Full construction with WASH aspects and protection 1 1 15,000,000 15,000,000Sub-total water pan construction 15,150,000

4 Community Training (water management committee) for the Waata and WaIlwana VMG Communities

*This assumes that each village will have one form of water facility or the other. The actual number of sites for training will be determined after the assessment **The estimate budget includes the cost of 3 Trainers and Training materials

Targeted Village Chewele, Vango, Dabolo, Darime, Nanighi, Bula Baraka, Dhida, Gubatu, Jara, Kaza Moyo, Tune, Shukule, Sombo, Gora, ShiaAdobe, Bili, Masibabu, Ghamrori, Kimilo, Darba, Bale, Kyobe, Ghaigopa, Hamesa and Mikomani (These include Waata and WaIlwana villages: see footnote)

3 day Training 1 25* 70,000** 1,750,000

Sub-Total Construction 1,750,000Sub-totals for Water Projects for the Waata and WaIlwana VMG communities of Tana River County

166,767,500

D9: Water sector projects for the Aweer VMG community of Lamu County1 Shallow well Construction for the Aweer VMG Community of Lamu County



Target Village Mararani and Pandanguo

Hydrogeological survey

Consultancies

Status assessment of all non-functional shallow wells

Consultancies 2 16 66,000 1,056,000

Cleaning and equipping of shallow wells with water pump

Civil works 2 16 100,000 1,600,000

Construction of pump house

Civil works 2 16 1,500,000 24,000,000

Equipping the pump house with a genset and accessories

Civil works 2 16 1,000,000 16,000,000

Construction of the pipeline

Civil works 2 16 800,000 12,800,000

Construction of a water kiosk and tank base

Civil works 2 16 800,000 12,800,000

Construction of 5 wells equipped with Afridev pumps

Civil works 2 16 1,000,000 16,000,000

Fencing of the wells Civil works 2 16 150,000 2,400,000

Sub - Total 86,656,000

2 Water Pipeline Extension for the Aweer VMG Community of Lamu County Target Village BasubaConstruction of pipeline and all related accessories; survey and costing already done

38,000,000 Note that survey, which part of this estimate, has already been done by the water department

Sub-Total water pipeline

38,000,000

3 Construction of 300 cubic metres Djabia Target Villages Basuba, Kiangwi, Madina, Bargoni and MararaniConstructing and equipping the 300 cubic meters Djabia

1 6 3,000,000 18,000,000

Sub-Total Djabia 18,000,0004 Pandanguo and Bargoni water projects have been surveyed and costed

by County Government (at the cost shown) 300,000,000 County Government

is sourcing for fundsSub-totals for water projects for the Aweer Community of Lamu County 442,656,000

D10: Water Sector Projects for the Sanye VMG communities of Lamu County Water Pipeline Extension for the Sanye VMG Community of Lamu County Target Villages Bahati Njema, Kwadae, Kizuke and Shekale

1 Bahati Njema VillageConstruction of 3km pipeline C/works 1 1 3,090,000 3,090,000Fittings and accessories 1 1 500,000 500,000Pipeline chambers 1 1 300,000 300,000Construction of a water kiosk, tank bases and installation of two tanks 10,000 and 5,000 litre tank

1 1 1,000,000 1,000,000

Sub-Total Bahati Njema 4,890,0002 Shekale Village

Construction of 1km pipeline 2'' 1 1 850,000 850,000Fittings and accessories 1 1 250,000 250,000



Pipeline chambers 1 1 150,000 150,000Construction of a water kiosk, tank bases and installation of tanks

1 1 1,000,000 1,000,000

Sub-Total Shekale 2,250,0002 Kizuke Village

Construction of 3.5km pipeline 2'' 1 1 3,605,000.00 3,605,000Fittings and accessories 1 1 350,000.00 350,000Pipeline chambers 1 1 350,000.00 350,000Construction of a water kiosk, tank bases and installation of 10,000 and 5,000 litre tank

1 1 1,000,000.00 1,000,000

Sub-Total Kizuke 5,305,0003 Kwadae Village

Construction of 3.5km pipeline 2'' 1 1 1,545,000.00 1,545,000Fittings and accessories 1 1 200,000.00 200,000Pipeline chambers 1 1 200,000.00 200,000Construction of a water kiosk, tank bases and installation of 10,000 and 5,000 litre tank

1 1 1,000,000.00 1,000,000

Sub-Total Kwadae 2,945,000Sub-Totals for water projects for the Wasanye community of Lamu County 15,390,000

4 Training It is assumed that the training budget is estimated for the both the Aweer and the Wasanye villages

Training on water projects management: Operation and maintenance: 15 pax * 3 days *12 villages

Consultancies

11 1 70,000 770,000

Sub-Total for Training 770,000

Grand Total for Water Projects for All VMG Communities 847,493,500E.

F. Infrastructure Support

E1: Bridge for Bombi Village, Waata VMG Community, Kilifi CountyActivities / Sub-Activities Category No.

Villages

Qty/Pax

No. Days

Unit Cost

Total

Support for Infrastructure - Bombi Village Site Assessment Facilitate technical Experts to undertake site assessment and generate BQ

Service 1 3 4 14,000

168,000

Drivers Service 1 2 4 6,300

50,400

Fuel Service 1 2 2 5,000

20,000

Support for EIA Report Service 1 1 1 100,000

100,000

Civil Works Estimated cost for rehabilitation Contract Civil

Works 1 1 1 4,000,00

0 4,000,00

0 Sub-Total 4,338,40

0

Grand Total for Infrastructure Support for Bombi Village 4,338,400



Grand Total for all Community Service Projects 3,087,008,700

8.2.1 Livelihoods, Economic and Cultural Support Projects

A. Livelihood Micro-Projects for the Munyoyaya Community of Tana River County

A1: Goat rearingNo. Activities/Sub-Activities Category No. of

VillagesQty Unit

CostTotal Remarks

1 Support for local goat rearing for the Munyoyaya VMG Target villages Matawarsesa Dirisa, Fafbare, Lagbadana, Mansghuda,

Qululiccha, Mulanjo, Bulaqumudho, Adele, Mororo, Korati, Boji, Hadhama, Butuma, Madogo, Konegudhufa, Malkamansa and Konoramadha

Note: The

estimates are based on the number of VMG villages per community and working with 100 households per village)

However, a household can only choose one type of livelihood micro-project based on their ability to manage and sustain it

Training per Village 0Training materials per Village Training 19 100 200 380,000Lunch ( during Training ) Training 19 100 500 950,000Facilitators ( DSA Rate) Training 19 4 7,000 532,000

Goat Housing (sanzu; self-build) No 19 100 0 0 Responsibility of householders

Purchase of 2 years local goats No 19 500 5,000 47,500,000 The goats gender: male to female ratio is 1:4

Quantity of goats per household is to be decided by the



project based on what can sustainably place the household on the road to livelihood self sufficiency

Vaccines No 19 100 0 0 Responsibility of County Government

Medicine ( Assorted) No 19 500 1,000 9,500,000 This is for six months per HH

Sub-Total for Goat Rearing 58,862,0002 Support for Beekeeping for the Munyoyaya VMG Community Note

The estimates are based on the number of VMG villages per community and working with 100 households per village)

beekeeping will be implemented at the group level e.g. by youth groups

Target villages Matawarsesa Dirisa, Fafbare, Lagbadana, Mansghuda, Qululiccha, Mulanjo, Bulaqumudho, Adele, Mororo, Korati, Boji, Hadhama, Butuma, Madogo, Konegudhufa, Malkamansa and Konoramadha

2a Training per Village on beekeeping Training

0 No of beehives per group will depend on number of members in the group and whether each member has to have own beehive

Training materials per Village Training

19 100 200 380,000

Lunch ( during Training )Training

19 100 00 950,000

Facilitators (DSA Rate) Training

19 4 7,000 532,000

Bee hive ( Langstroth)No

19 100 4,650 8,835,000

2b Beekeeping equipment 0

Bee Keeping Kit ( Nylon)No

19 1 10,000 190,000

Honey Extractor No 19 1 75,000 1,425,000



Honey Refractometer No 19 1 60,000 1,140,000

Honey Setting Tank No 19 1 50,000 950,000

Packing Tapes No 19 100 100 190,000

Wax Extractor No 19 1 30,000 570,000

Digital Weighing Scale No 19 1 50,000 950,000

Sealer Machine No

19 1 60,000 1,140,000

Honey Processor No

19 1 120,000

2,280,000

Plastic Jar ( 250 g / 500 g) No

19 100 45 85,500

Harvesting Buckets No

19 100 1,000 1,900,000

Sub-Total for Beekeepingtraining and equipment 21,517,500

3 Support to Poultry production for the Munyoyaya VMG Community

Target villages Matawarsesa Dirisa, Fafbare, Lagbadana, Mansghuda, Qululiccha, Mulanjo, Bulaqumudho, Adele, Mororo, Korati, Boji, Hadhama, Butuma, Madogo, Konegudhufa, Malkamansa and Konoramadha

The estimates are based on the number of VMG villages per community and working with 100 households per village)

4Training per Village

Training to be done at village level

Training materials per Village Training 19 100 200 380,000

Lunch ( during Training ) Training 19 100 500 950,000

Facilitators’ ( DSA Rate) Training 19 4 7,000 532,000

Chicken Chicken 19 500 500 4,750,000 Locally Bought in Baghali , the type of chicken bought are juveniles 3 months

Chicken Housing Equipment 19 100 10,000 19,000,000



Vaccine ( New Castle Disease ) No. 19 100 0

0

Offered freely by the County Government

Sub-Total Poultry 25,612,000

Sub-Total Livestock for Munyoyaya VMG community 105,991,500

A2: Agricultural projects for Munyoyaya VMG community of Tana River CountyActivities / Sub-Activities Category No.

Villages

Qty Unit Cost

Total Remarks

1 Irrigated farming for Munyoyaya VMG community1a Fencing

Target Villages Mansguda, Mataworsesa, Boji, Adele, Fafbare, Mulanjo, Korati, Malkamasa, Butuma, Kululicha, Bula Firimbi, Konoramadha and LagbadhanaNetted fence supported by bricks

and cemented base including labour and (CF 1 acre (70x70m): Unit cost per metre) materials

Civil works

13 280 3,000 10,920,000

Sub-Total Fencing 10,920,0001b Canal

Target Villages Mansguda, Mataworsesa, Fafbare and AdeleMain brick canal from the river to the farm: Including labour and materials (CF 1Topx0.5Dx0.4Bottom) - (m): Unit cost per metre

Civil works

4 500 2,500 5,000,000

Infield water distribution canals Civil works

4 70 1,000 280,000Infield water distribution boxes Civil

works4 2 40,000 320,000

Sub-Total Canal 5,600,000

1c Solar panel powered pump capable of irrigating 50 acres

Target Villages Mansguda, Mataworsesa, Boji, Adele, Fafbare, Mulanjo, Korati, Malkamasa, Butuma, Kululicha, Bula Firimbi and Konoramadha LagbadhanaSuction end pump 15 KW

discharge at 10L/s at 40m hydraulic head

13 1 200,000

2,600,000

132 Solar panels 150W/160W 24 VDC crystalline module

13 1 2,000,000

26,000,000

15Kw 3PH motor complete with disconnect switch and controller cables

13 1 1,000,000

13,000,000

3m high steel support structure 13 1 500,000

6,500,000Pump shade 13 1 180,00

02,340,000

Sub-Total solar panels 50,440,0001d Bush clearing: Mathenge

Target Villages Fafbare and Malkamansa, MataworsesaSlashing and stumping and removal of debris (Per acre)

3 1 50,000 150,000

Sub-Total Bush clearing 50,0002 Farm inputs for Munyoyaya VMG community

Horticulture: Sweet melons, capsicum, onions, water melon, tomatoesTarget Villages Mansguda, Mataworsesa, Boji, Adele, Fafbare,

Mulanjo, Korati, Malkamasa, Butuma, Kululicha, Bula Firimbi, Konoramadha and Lagbadhana

Certified seeds (0.2kg) 14 1 6,000 84,000Urea (50kg) 14 1 3,500 49,000DAP50kg 14 1 5,000 70,000



Pesticides (200mlsx6 weeks) 14 1 2,000 28,000Foliar (2L/Ha) 14 2 1,000 28,000Knapsack spray pump 14 1 18,900 264,600Protective gear 14 1 5,300 74,200Sub-Total farm inputs 597,800

3 Greenhouse for Munyoyaya VMG communityTarget Village MadogoComplete standard size: tank, pipes, structure, drip lines

1 5 150,000 750,000

Sub-Total Greenhouse 750,0004 Tree nursery - 3M x 50M for Munyoyaya VMG community

Target Village MadogoWheelbarrow 1 2 3,500 7,000Potting tubes 1 10 1,500 15,000Certified seeds 1 1 20,000 20,000Shade net 1 3 1,500 4,500Rakes 1 2 200 400Jembe 1 2 500 1,000Panga 1 2 300 600Watering cans 1 5 500 2,500FYM 1 1 5,000 5,0005000l water tank, pipes, base 1 1 100,000 100,000Sub-Total tree nursery 156,000

5 Training: 50 pax for 3 days for Munyoyaya VMG communityTarget Villages Mansguda, Mataworsesa, Boji, Adele, Fafbare,

Mulanjo, Korati, Malkamasa, Butuma, Kululicha, Bula Firimbi, Konoramadha, Lagbadhana

Stationery ( 50 pieces) 13 1 6,000 78,000Fare reimbursement 13 50 1,000 650,000Accommodation 13 150 1,500 2,925,000Facilitators 13 6 15,000 1,170,000Venue 13 3 5,000 195,000Field visits 13 1 50,000 650,000Miscellaneous (refreshments etc.) 13 1 50,000 650,000Sub-Total Training 6,318,000Sub-Total Agriculture for Munyoyaya VMG community 74,831,800

A3: Fish Farming projects for Munyoyaya VMG community of Tana River1 Fish farming for Munyoyaya VMG community1a Baseline survey

Fuel Goods 1 120 110 13,200DSA (Fisheries officer) Services 1 5 4,200 21,000DSA (Officer) Services 1 5 6,300 31,500Sub-Total 65,700

1b Capacity building - Training on fish farming practices (TOT at Sagana)Fees 1 1 30,000 30,000Transport 1 2 2,000 4,000DSA 1 2 2,100 4,200Sub-Total 38,200

1c Training on fish farming practices at GarsenDSA (Community) Training 1 6 2,100 12,600Transport (Farmers) from 2 villages

Training 1 2 3,000 6,000

Transport (Farmers)-Madogo Training 1 3 2,000 6,000Sub-Total 24,600

1d Facilitation of trainingDSA (Fisheries officer) 1 6 6,300 37,800



DSA (Fisheries officer) 1 6 7,000 42,000Transport Fuel 1 30 110 3,300Conference package 1 6 5,000 30,000Stationery 1 1 15,000 15,000Refreshments 1 1 20,000 20,000Sub-Total 148,100

1e Pond set upPond construction (1 for hatchery)

6 1 45,000 270,000

Purchase of pond liners 6 1 120,000 720,000Fencing (Chain link) 6 1 120,000 720,000Fencing (Chicken wire) 400,000Overhead nets 6 1 120,000 720,000Sub-Total 2,830,000

1f Purchase of equipmentWheel barrows 6 1 5,000 30,000Jembes 6 6 400 14,400Pangas 6 5 600 18,000Compactors for soil compaction 6 5 500 15,000Sub-Total 77,400

1g Fingerling supplyPurchase of fingerlings 5 1,000 10 50,000DSA Driver 1 2 4,200 8,400DSA Officer 1 2 6,300 12,600DSA Community 1 2 2,100 4,200Fuel 1 120 110 13,200Sub-Total 88,400

1h Fish feedsPurchase of fertilizer (DAP) 5 2 1,000 10,000Purchase of fish feeds pellets 5 180 35 31,500Sub-Total 41,500

1i HarvestingSeine Net 5 1 10,000 50,000Scoop net 5 1 1,000 5,000Deep freezers 3 1 70,000 210,000Cooler box 2 2 10,000 40,000Provision for supply of water 1 1 1,500,000 1,500,000Sub-Total 1,805,000Sub-Total Fish Farming 5,118,900

A4: Ecotourism projects for Munyoyaya VMG community of Tana River1 Ecotourism Project for the Waata and WaIlwana VMG Community

Target Villages Asako and Boji

1a Camp site

Fencing about 10 ha of land around campsite - Fencing + gate (10 Ha)

2 10 300,000 6,000,000

Campsite - Water (Borehole/ shallow well - solar propelled) and water tank

2 1 1,500,000 3,000,000

Bathroom and toilet facilities 2 1 500,000 1,000,000Housing for security staff and Reception

2 1 1,000,000 2,000,000

Solar energy set 2 1 120,000 240,000Tented camps 2 10 20,000 400,000Marketing - Brochures 2 50,000Website hosting 2 50,000

1b Fibre glass boat 0Fibre -glass motor boat - Fibre 2 1 600,000 1,200,000



glass motor boat + Life saver equipmentCapacity building - Training and awareness forums by KWS

2 1 1,000,000 2,000,000

1c Ostrich farming 0Ostrich Rearing - Fencing + gate (10 Ha)

1 10 300,000 3,000,000

Solar water pump 1 1 900,000 900,000 Capacity Building on ostrich rearing

1 1 1,500,000 1,500,000

Sourcing for ostrich Chicks 1 1 200,000 200,000Administration Cost 10% of cost (Lump-sum)

2,321,400

Sub-Total Ecotourism 23,861,400

A5: Cultural Centre project for Munyoyaya VMG community of Tana RiverActivities / Sub-Activities Categor

yNo.

VillagesQty Unit

CostTotal Remark

sCultural Centre for the Waata and WaIlwana VMG CommunityTarget Villages Madogo Construction and furnishing of an administration block (Offices for staff, Registry, Store, Reception area and Accounts section)

1 1 2,000,000 2,000,000

1a Construction and furnishing of multipurpose hall (Capacity of 200 seated with provisions of future expansion)

1 1 5,000,000 5,000,000

Construction of equipped e- toilets for ladies and gentlemen(VIP toilets)

1 1 1,500,000 1,500,000

Construction and furnishing of a conference room (Modern conference room with necessary conferencing facilities)

1 1 1,500,000 1,500,000

Construction of canteen/ kitchen/ restaurant (1 equipped kitchen for culinary arts. Serving hall with a capacity of 40 persons)

1 1 2,000,000 2,000,000

Construction of Cultural/curio shop(For art work/Material culture crafts)

1 1 1,500,000 1,500,000

Construction and equipping of a Conservation laboratory (Used for conserving animal hides and plants for display in the museum)

1 1 1,000,000 1,000,000

Construction of Visual arts storage and cultural museum (Display area)

1 1 2,500,000 2,500,000

Gallery (For permanent exhibition of ancient tools, materials)

1 1 2,500,000 2,500,000

Cultural information/ Library/ Information Centre (To include studios floor recording purposes)

1 1 3,000,000 3,000,000

Cultural centre botanical garden (For medicinal herbs and vegetable)

1 1 500,000 500,000

Open air theatre hosting a built stage ( For open air performances)

1 1 1,500,000 1,500,000

Parking space area (For approximately 5 buses and cars)

1 1 500,000 500,000

Traditional homesteads 1 1 100,000 100,000Administrative cost 10% of cost 2,610,000Sub-Total 27,710,000



2 Required Personnel for Cultural Centre of Munyoyaya VMG community

Remarks

Designation No. Required Responsibility for these personnel and their recurrent expenditures have to be agreed before hand

Cultural centre manager 1Assistant Cultural centre manager 1Cultural Officer 1Librarian 2Curator 1Office assistant/ Clerical Officer 2Technician (sound / ICT) 1Artisan 1Security Personnel 2Subordinate Staff 2Sub-Total Cultural Centre for the Munyoyaya 27,710,000

A6: Micro-Enterprise projects for Munyoyaya VMG community of Tana RiverActivities / Sub-Activities Category Running Costs Fixed

CostsTotal Costs

Remarks

1 Micro-Enterprises for the Waata and WaIlwana VMG CommunityTargeted villagesVegetable Business - Villages Near Garissa

Initial Capital

10,000 10,000 The targeted and number of people per village villages to be determined during village forums

This estimate is for cost of one trip plus 25% variation costs per household

Vegetable Business - Villages far form Garissa

Initial Capital

10,000 10,000

Goats Business - Mbalambala Village Near Garissa

Initial Capital

45,000 45,000 This estimate is for cost of one trip plus 25% variation costs per person household

Goats Business - Mlanjo Village far form Garissa

Initial Capital

35,000 35,000

Poultry Business - For all villages Initial Capital

11,000 11,000 This estimate is for cost of one trip plus 25% variation costs per household

Petrol Business - Buys from Garissa

Initial Capital

20,000 20,000 This estimate is the cost of one trip plus 25% variation per household

The selling of petrol by unlicensed persons is illegal and unsafe for both the individual and the community. It is not encouraged by county government

Clothes Business - Asako Village - Buys from Garissa

Initial Capital


Clothes Business - Mororo Village - Buys from NBI

Initial Capital


Food vending - Hawking Initial Capital

1,500 1,500



Food vending - Stall Initial Capital

15,000 15,000

Sub-Total micro-enterprise 255,000

Other possible micro enterprisesCommercial fodder Details on this would have to be

determined at start of implementation in each county

Motor bikes

Grand Total for Livelihood ventures for the Munyoyaya VMG community of Tana Rive County

237,768,600

B. Livelihood Micro-Projects for the Waata VMG Community of Tana River County

B1: Livestock micro-projects for the WaataNo.


Category No. of Villages

Quantity Unit Cost

Total Remarks

1 Poultry Keeping for Waata VMG community (This is based on the 7 villages and working with 100 households)Target Villages Darime, Gubatu, Gora, Bili, Dhida, Hamesa and SomboTraining per Village Training 7 100 0 0 It shall be done at

Village level. However, each household can only choose one livelihood micro-project

Training materials per Village

Training 7 100 200 140,000

Lunch ( during Training )

Training 7 100 500 350,000

Facilitators ( DSA Rate) Training 7 4 7,000 196,000Chicken Chicken 7 500 500 1,750,000 Locally Bought in

Baghali, the type of chicken bought are juveniles (3 ½ months old)

Chicken Housing Equipment 7 100 10,000 7,000,000Vaccine (New Castle Disease )

No. 7 100 0 0 Offered freely by the County Government

Transport 7 1 20,000 140,000Sub-Total 9,576,000

2 Bee Keeping for Waata VMG community (This is based on 7 villages and working with 100 households)Target Villages Darime, Gubatu, Gora, Bili, Dhida, Hamesa and SomboTraining per Village Training 7 100 0 0 it shall be done at

Village level Training materials per Village

Training 7 100 200 140,000


Training 7 100 500 350,000

Facilitators ( DSA Rate) Training 7 4 7,000 196,000Bee hive ( Langstroth) No 7 100 4,650 3,255,000Bee Keeping Kit ( Nylon)

No 7 1 10,000 70,000

Honey Extractor No 7 1 75,000 525,000Honey Refractometer No 7 1 60,000 420,000Honey Setting Tank No 7 1 50,000 350,000



Packing Tapes No 7 100 100 70,000Wax Extractor No 7 1 30,000 210,000Digital Weighing Scale No 7 1 50,000 350,000Sealer Machine No 7 1 60,000 420,000Honey Processor No 7 1 120,000 840,000Plastic Jar ( 250g/500 g) No 7 100 45 31,500Harvesting Buckets No 7 100 1,000 700,000Sub-Total Bee Keeping 7,927,500

3 Goat Rearing for Waata VMG community (This is based on the 7 villages and working with 100 households)Target Villages Darime, Gubatu, Gora, Bili, Dhida, Hamesa and SomboTraining per Village Training 7 100 0 0 Training shall be done

at Village levelTraining materials per Village

Training 7 100 200 140,000


Training 7 100 500 350,000

Community Mobilization ( Village Mobiliser)

7 3 1,000 21,000 3 mobilisers can work in all the 25 (Waata and WaIlwana) villages

Facilitators( DSA Rate) Training 7 4 7,000 196,000Purchase Indigenous Goats ( 2 years )

No 7 500 5,000 17,500,000 5 goats (4 female 1 male in 100household)

Goat Housing (sanzu; self-build)

No 7 100 0 0 community to providehousing

Medicine ( Assorted ) No 7 100 2,000 1,400,000 to be given by thecounty officers

Vaccines No 7 500 0 0 Offered freely by the County Government

Identification of Goats No 7 5 5,000 175,000 To be done byexperts together withthe villagers themselves

Committee for Identification

No 7 3 500 10,500

Transport No 7 1 45,000 315,000Sub-Total Goat Rearing

20,107,500

Sub-Total Livestock projects for Waata VMG community of Tana River County 37,611,000



B2: Agricultural projects for Waata VMG community of Tana River County1 Irrigated Farming for the Waata VMG Community

FencingTarget Villages Dhida and SomboNetted fence supported by bricks and cemented base including labour and materials

Civil works 2 280 3,000 1,680,000 CF 1 acre (70x70m)= 840,000/acre

Sub-Total fencing 1,680,000Water Pump (Solar panel powered pump capable of irrigating 50 acres)Target Villages Gubatu, Bili, Darime, Dhida and GoraSuction end pump 15 KW discharge at 10L/s at 40m hydraulic head

Civil works 5 1 200,000 1,000,000


Civil works 5 1 2,000,000

10,000,000


Civil works 5 1 1,000,000

5,000,000

3m high steel support structure

Civil works 5 1 500,000 2,500,000

Pump shade Civil works 5 1 180,000 900,000Sub-Total 19,400,000 3,880,000/villageWater Pump (Diesel Powered)Diesel powered 5 1 250,000 1,250,000diesel 5 500 100 250,000Sub-Total Diesel pump 1,500,000 300,000/VillageWater Pipes UPVCTarget Villages Hamesa and Darime6 Inch including excavation, laying of pipes labour and materials

2 200 1,300 260,000

Sub-Total water pipes 520,000 260,000/villageBush ClearingTarget Villages Darime and GoraSlashing, de-stumping and removal of debris

2 1 100,000 200,000

Sub-Total bush clearing

200,000 100,000/acre

Sub-Total Irrigated Farming 23,300,0002 Farm Inputs for the Waata VMG Community

Horticulture: (pojo, water melon, tomatoes)Target Villages Gora and Sombo Pojo (Kg) 2 4 200 1,600 Certified SeedsTomatoes: Kilele F1, Eden F1(0.2kg)

2 1 6,000 12,000 Certified Seeds

Sweet melon F1(per acre)


Pesticides in litres (200mlsx6 weeks)

2 1 1,500 3,000

Knapsack spray pump 2 1 7,000 14,000Jembe 2 4 700 5,600Spade 2 2 500 2,000Sub-Total Farm Inputs 47,200 22,900/acre

3 Greenhouse for the Waata VMG Community



Target Village HamesaComplete standard size: tank, pipes, structure, drip lines, inputs and training

1 1 300,000 300,000

Sub-Total Greenhouse 300,000Sub-Total for Agricultural projects for the Waata VMG community of Tana River County 23,647,200

B3: Fish Farming projects for Waata VMG community of Tana River CountyFish Farming for the Waata VMG CommunityTarget Villages Sombo, Gubatu, Bili and Dhida

1a Baseline surveyFuel (in litres) Goods N/A 120 110 13,200DSA (Fisheries officer) Services N/A 5 4,200 21,000DSA (Officer) Services N/A 5 6,300 31,500Sub- Total Survey 65,700

1b Capacity Building - Training on fish farming practices (TOT at Sagana)(2 PERSONS)Fees N/A 2 30,000 60,000Transport N/A 2 4,000 8,000DSA N/A 4 2,100 8,400Sub-Total Training 76,400

1c Training on fish farming practices at GarsenDSA (Community) Training 10 5 2,100 105,000Transport (Farmers) Training 10 2 2,000 40,000Sub-Total Training 145,000Sub-Total Training 290,000

1d Facilitation of trainingDSA (Fisheries officer) service 1 10 6,300 63,000DSA(Director service 1 5 7,000 35,000Transport Fuel goods 1 60 110 6,600Refreshments service 5 22 650 71,500Stationery service 1 1 15,000 15000Sub-Total Facilitation 191,100

2a Pond Set Up for Waata VNG communityTarget Villages Sombo, Gubatu,Bili and DhidaPond construction (2 for hatchery)

4 2 45,000 360,000 Assuming it is 1 pond per village

Purchase of pond liners 4 1 120,000 480,000Fencing (Chicken wire) 4 1 144,000 576,000Overhead nets 4 1 40,000 160,000Sub-total fish pond set up

1,576,000

2b Purchase of Fish Farming Equipment for the Waata VMG CommunityTarget Villages Sombo, Gubatu,Bili and DhidaWheel barrows 4 1 5,000 20,000Jembes 4 4 400 6,400Pangas 4 2 400 3,200Spades 4 4 500 8,000Compactors for soil compaction

4 2 500 4,000

Sub-Total Equipment 41,6002c Fingerling Supply for the Waata VMG Community

Target Villages Sombo, Gubatu, Bili and DhidaPurchase of fingerlings 4 1,000 10 40,000DSA Driver 4 2 4,200 33,600DSA Officer 4 2 6,300 50,400DSA Community 4 2 2,100 16,800Fuel 4 120 110 52,800Sub-Total Fingerling 193,600



2d Fish feeds for the Waata VMG CommunityTarget Villages Sombo, Gubatu, Bili and DhidaPurchase of fertilizer (DAP)

4 1 500 2,000

Purchase of fish feeds pellets

4 50 35 7,000

Sub-Total Feeds 9,0002e Fish Harvesting for the Waata VMG Community

Target Villages Sombo, Gubatu, Bili and DhidaSeine Net 4 1 10,000 40,000Scoop net 4 1 1,000 4,000Deep freezers 4 1 70,000 280,000Cooler box 4 4 12,000 192,000Provision for supply of water

4 1 3,000,000

12,000,000

Sub-Total Harvesting 12,516,000Sub-Total Fish Farming for the Waata VMG Community of Tana River 14,959,400

B4: Micro-enterprise for the Waata VMG community of Tana RiverNo.



Running Costs

Fixed Costs

Total Remarks

1 Micro Enterprises for the Waata and WaIlwana VMG Community Confirm location of this village (whether it is a Waata or WaIlwana village)

Target Village Bili, Bangale* and DharimeBoda boda spare parts Initial

Capital3 200,000 600,000

Goats Business Initial Capital

3 50,000 150,000

Poultry (Local) Business Initial Capital

3 15,000 45,000

Clothes Business Initial Capital

3 62,500 187,500

Food Kiosk Initial Capital

3 50,000 150,000

Sub-Total Micro Enterprises 1,132,500Sub-Total Micro Enterprises for Waata VMG community of Tana River County 1,132,500

Grand Total for Livelihood Micro-Projects for the Waata of Tana River County

77,350,100

C. Livelihood Micro-Projects for the WaIlwana VMG Community of Tana River

C1: Livestock projects for WaIlwana VMG communities of Tana River1 Poultry Keeping for WaIlwana VMG community (This is based on the 18 villages and

working with 100 households)Target Villages Dabolo, Nanighi, Chewele, Tune, ShiaAdobe, Mikomani, Jarha,

Bula Baraka, Bale, Kyobe, Darba, Kaza Moyo, Kimilo, Ghamorori, Vango, Mansababu, Ghaigopa and Shuqule

Training per Village Training 18 100 0 0 It shall be done at Village level


Training 18 100 200 360,000


Training 18 100 500 900,000

Facilitators ( DSA Rate) Training 18 4 7,000 504,000Chicken Chicken 18 500 500 4,500,000 Locally Bought in

Baghali, the type of chicken bought are juveniles (3 ½ months



old) Chicken Housing Equipment 18 100 10,000 18,000,000Vaccine ( New Castle Disease )

No. 18 100 0 0 Offered freely by the County Government

Transport 18 1 20,000 360,000Sub-Total Poultry 24,624,000

2 Bee Keeping for WaIlwana VMG community (This is based on the 18 villages and working with 100 households)Target Villages Dabolo, Nanighi, Chewele, Tune, ShiaAdobe, Mikomani, Jarha,


Training per Village Training 18 100 0 0 it shall be done at Village level


Training 18 100 200 360,000


Training 18 100 500 900,000

Facilitators ( DSA Rate) Training 18 4 7,000 504,000Bee hive ( Langstroth) No 18 100 4,650 8,370,000Bee Keeping Kit ( Nylon)

No 18 1 10,000 180,000

Honey Extractor No 18 1 75,000 1,350,000Honey Refractometer No 18 1 60,000 1,080,000Honey Setting Tank No 18 1 50,000 900,000Packing Tapes No 18 100 100 180,000Wax Extractor No 18 1 30,000 540,000Digital Weighing Scale No 18 1 50,000 900,000Sealer Machine No 18 1 60,000 1,080,000Honey Processor No 18 1 120,000 2,160,000Plastic Jar ( 250g/500 g) No 18 100 45 81,500Harvesting Buckets No 18 100 1,000 1,800,000Sub-Total Bee Keeping 20,385,500

3 Goat Rearing for WaIlwana VMG community (This is based on the 7 villages and working with 100 households)Target Villages Dabolo, Nanighi, Chewele, Tune, ShiaAdobe, Mikomani, Jarha,


Training per Village Training 18 100 0 0 it shall be done at Village level


Training 18 100 200 360,000


Training 18 100 500 900,000

Community Mobilisation ( Village Mobiliser)

18 3 1,000 54,000

Facilitators( DSA Rate) Training 18 4 7,000 504,000Purchase Indigenous Goats ( 2 years )

No 18 500 5,000 45,000,000 5 goats (4 female 1 male X 100 households)

Goat Housing (sanzu; self-build)

No 18 100 0 0 Each household to provide housing

Medicine ( Assorted ) No 18 100 2,000 3,600,000Vaccines No 18 500 0 0 Offered freely by the

County GovernmentIdentification of Goats No 18 5 5,000 450,000 To be done by

experts together withthe villagers themselves

Committee for Identification of goats

No 18 3 500 27,000



Transport No 18 1 45,000 810,000Sub-Total Goat Rearing

51,705,000

Sub-Total Livestock projects for WaIlwana VMG community of Tana River County 96,714,500

C2: Agricultural projects for WaIlwana VMG community of Tana River CountyNo.



Quantity Unit Cost

Total Remarks

Irrigated Farming for the WaIlwana VMG Community1a Fencing

Target Villages Shuqule, Mikomani, Jarha, Darba, Kimilo, Ghaigopa, Tune, Kaza Moyo, Bula Baraka and Kyobe

Netted fence supported by bricks and cemented base including labour and materials

Civil works 10 280 3,000 8,400,000 CF 1 acre (70x70m)= 840,000/acre

Sub-Total fencing 8,400,0001b Water Pump (Solar panel powered pump capable of irrigating 50 acres)

Target Villages Mansababu, Shuqule, ShiaAdobe, Mikomani, Jarha, Bale, Darba, Tune, Ghaigopa, Ghamorori, Kaza Moyo, Bula Baraka and Kyobe

Suction end pump 15 KW discharge at 10L/s at 40m hydraulic head

Civil works 14 1 200,000 2,800,000


Civil works 14 1 2,000,000

28,000,000


Civil works 14 1 1,000,000

14,000,000

3m high steel support structure

Civil works 14 1 500,000 7,000,000

Pump shade Civil works 14 1 180,000 2,520,000Sub-Total 54,320,000

1c Water Pump (Diesel Powered)Diesel powered 14 1 250,000 3,500,000diesel 14 500 100 700,000Sub-Total Diesel pump 4,200,000

1d Water Pipes UPVCTarget Villages ShiaAdobe, Jarha, Bale, Darba, Ghaigopa, Chewele, Tune,

Ghamorori, Kaza Moyo and Kyobe6 Inch including excavation, laying of pipes labour and materials

10 200 1,300 2,600,000

Sub-Total water pipes 2,600,000 260, 000 per village1e Bush Clearing

Target Villages Mikomani, Tune and Bula BarakaSlashing, de-stumping and removal of debris

3 1 100,000 300,000

Sub-Total bush clearing

300,000 100,000 Per acre

Sub-Total Irrigated Farming 69,820,0002 Ploughing and Ridging for the WaIlwana VMG Community

Target Village Chewele and DarbaPloughing 2 50 3,000 300,000Ridging 2 50 2,000 200,000Sub-Total ploughing and ridging 500,000

3 Farm Inputs for the WaIlwana VMG Community



Horticulture(Horticulture: pojo, water melon, tomatoes)Target Villages Ghamorori and Bula Baraka Pojo (Kg) 2 4 200 1,600 Certified SeedsTomatoes: Kilele F1, Eden F1(0.2kg)


Sweet melon F1(per acre)


Pesticides in litres (200mlsx6 weeks)

2 1 1,500 3,000

Knapsack spray pump 2 1 7,000 14,000Jembe 2 4 700 5,600Spade 2 2 500 2,000Sub-Total Inputs 47,200 22,900 Per acre

2 Tree nursery - 3M x 50M for WaIlwana VMG communityTarget Village Kyobe and DarbaWheelbarrow 2 2 3,500 14,000Potting tubes 2 10 1,500 30,000Certified seeds 2 1 20,000 40,000Shade net 2 3 7,500 45,000Rakes 2 2 200 800Jembe 2 2 500 2,000Panga 2 2 300 1,200Watering cans 2 5 500 5,000FYM 2 1 5,000 10,0005000l water tank, pipes, base

2 1 100,000 200,000

Fence 2 250 1,000 500,000Sub-Total 848,000

Sub-Total Agricultural Projects for WaIlwana 71,215,200

C3: Fish Farming projects for WaIlwana VMG community of Tana River CountyNo.



Quantity Unit Cost

Total Remarks

Fish Farming for the WaIlwana VMG CommunityTarget Villages Kimilo, ShiaAdobe, Bale, Ghaigopa, Nanighi, Ghamorori and

Mikomani1a Baseline survey

Fuel Goods N/A 120 110 13,200DSA (Fisheries officer) Services N/A 5 4,200 21,000DSA (Officer) Services N/A 5 6,300 31,500Sub- Total Survey 65,700

1b Capacity Building - Training on fish farming practices (TOT at Sagana)(2 PERSONS)Fees N/A 2 30,000 60,000Transport N/A 2 4,000 8,000DSA N/A 4 2,100 8,400Sub-Total Training 76,400

1c Training on fish farming practices at GarsenDSA (Community) Training 10 5 2,100 105,000Transport (Farmers) Training 10 2 2,000 40,000Sub-Total Training 145,000

1d Facilitation of trainingDSA (Fisheries officer) service 1 10 6,300 63,000DSA(Director service 1 5 7,000 35,000Transport Fuel goods 1 60 110 6,600Refreshments service 5 22 650 71,500Stationery service 1 1 15,000 15000Sub-Total Facilitation 191,100

2 Pond Set Up for WaIlwana VNG communityTarget Villages Kimilo, ShiaAdobe, Bale, Ghaigopa, Nanighi, Ghamorori and



MikomaniPond construction (2 for hatchery)

11 2 45,000 990,000 1 pond per village is assumed

Purchase of pond liners 11 1 120,000 1,320,000Fencing (Chicken wire) 11 1 144,000 1,584,000Overhead nets 11 1 40,000 440,000Sub-Total Set UP 4,334,000

3 Purchase of Fish Farming Equipment for the WaIlwana VMG CommunityTarget Villages Kimilo, ShiaAdobe, Bale, Ghaigopa, Nanighi, Ghamorori and

MikomaniWheel barrows 11 1 5,000 55,000Jembes 11 4 400 17,600Pangas 11 2 400 8,800Spades 11 4 500 22,000Compactors for soil compaction

11 2 500 11,000

Sub-Total Equipment 114,400

4 Fingerling Supply for the WaIlwana VMG CommunityTarget Villages Kimilo, ShiaAdobe, Bale, Ghaigopa, Nanighi, Ghamorori and

MikomaniPurchase of fingerlings 11 1,000 10 110,000DSA Driver 11 2 4,200 92,400DSA Officer 11 2 6,300 138,600DSA Community 11 2 2,100 46,200Fuel 11 120 110 145,200Sub-Total Fingerling 532,400

5 Fish feeds for the WaIlwana VMG CommunityTarget Villages Kimilo, ShiaAdobe, Bale, Ghaigopa, Nanighi, Ghamorori and

MikomaniPurchase of fertilizer (DAP)

11 1 500 5,5000


11 50 35 19,250

Sub-Total Feeds 74,2506 Harvesting for the WaIlwana VMG Community

Target Villages Kimilo, ShiaAdobe, Bale, Ghaigopa, Nanighi, Ghamorori and Mikomani

Seine Net 11 1 10,000 110,000Scoop net 11 1 1,000 11,000Deep freezers 11 1 70,000 770,000Cooler box 11 4 12,000 528,000Provision for supply of water

11 1 3,000,000

33,000,000

Sub-Total Harvesting 34,419,000Sub-Total Fish Farming for the WaIlwana VMG Community of Tana River County 40,097,250

C4: Micro-enterprise for the WaIlwana VMG community of Tana RiverNo.



Running Costs

Fixed Costs

Total Remarks

1 Micro Enterprises for the Waata and WaIlwana VMG Community A household can only engage in one micro-enterprise

Target Village Nanighi, Bula Baraka, VangoBoda boda spare parts Initial

Capital3 200,000 600,000

Goats Business Initial Capital

3 50,000 150,000

Poultry (Local) Business Initial Capital

3 15,000 45,000

Clothes Business Initial 3 62,500 187,500



CapitalFood Kiosk Initial

Capital3 50,000 150,000

Sub-Total Micro Enterprises 1,132,500Sub-total micro-enterprises for the Waata and WaIlwana communities of Tana River County 1,132,500



C5: Ecotourism venture for the WaIlwana VMG community of Tana River CountyNo.



Quantity Unit Cost

Total Remarks

3 Conservancy for WaIlwana VMG community of Tana riverTarget Village Bale

3a Nature trail fencing about 10 ha (Fencing + gate -10 Ha)

1 10 300,000 3,000,000

3b Camping site (Water -Borehole/ shallow well - solar propelled and water tank)

1 1 1,500,000

1,500,000

Bathroom and toilet facilities

1 1 500,000 500,000

Tented camps 1 10 20,000 200,000Sleeping bags 1 4 7,000 28,000Recruitment and training of scouts

1 6 0 To be provided by County government

Marketing (Brochures) 1 50,000Website hosting 1 50,000

3c Housing for security staff and Reception

1 1 1,000,000

1,000,000

Hand held Radios 1 3 40,000 120,000Solar energy set 1 1 120,000 120,000

3d Fibre glass motor boat (Fibre glass motor boat + Life saver equipment)

1 1 700,000 700,000

Capacity building(Training and awareness forums by KWS)

1 1 1,000,000

1,000,000

3e Ostrich Rearing (Fencing + gate -10 Ha)

1 10 300,000 3,000,000

Solar water pump 1 1 900,000 900,000Capacity Building on ostrich rearing

1 1 1,500,000

1,500,000

Sourcing for ostrich Chicks

1 1 200,000 200,000

Administration Cost 10% of cost ( Lump sum)

1,372,000

Sub-Total Conservancy 15,240,000

Grand Total Livelihood ventures for the WaIlwana VMGs of Tana River

224,399,450

B/C: Joint Livelihood ventures for the Waata and WaIlwana VMG Communities of Tana River County

B2/C2: Joint training of Waata and WaIlwana farmers – Tana River County4 Training (ToT): 50 pax for 3 days and 2 nursery groups for the WaIlwana and Waata

VMG Communities of Tana RiverStationery ( 50 pieces) 1 L/sum 1 6,00

0 6,000

Fare reimbursement 1 No. 50 1,000

50,000

Accommodation 2 Pax 50 1,500

50,000



Facilitators 3 No. 6 15,000

270,000

Venue 1 Days 3 5,000

15,000

Field visits 1 L/sum 1 50,000

50,000

Miscellaneous (refreshments etc.)

1 L/sum 1 50,000

50,000

Sub-Total 591,000

B5/C6: Joint Cultural Center venture for Waata and WaIlwana VMG communities of Tana River CountyNo. Activities/Sub-

ActivitiesCategory No. of

VillagesQuantity Unit

CostTotal Remarks

1 Cultural Centre for the Waata and WaIlwana VMG CommunityTarget Villages Location not identified (to be agreed with the two communities

during the village forumsEstimate costs are for two villages

Land Provided by community

Fencing 1 ha (Chain link with gate)

Civil works 2 1 300,000 600,000

Traditional homesteads (Each traditional home had 3 houses-men, women and family house)

Civil works 2 3 100,000 600,000

Purchase and collection of artefacts for museum (Pots, beads, beds, cooking utensils, hides and skins, weapons, traditional seats, Bows and Arrows clothing)

Procurement

2 various 400,000 800,000

Training of communities on how to make traditional artefacts, singing, dancing etc.

2 various 400,000 800,000

Capacity building- awareness and sensitization

2 various 500,000 1,000,000

Construction and furnishing of an administration block (Offices for staff, Store, Reception area and Accounts section)

Civil works 2 1 600,000 1,200,000

Toilets for ladies and gentlemen (One block 2 door VIP latrine)

2 1 300,000 600,000

Open air theatre hosting a built stage

2 1 500,000 1,000,000

Pipe water reticulation 2 km (20 pipes, metal poles, 5,000ltrs tank)

Civil works 2 1 150,000 300,000

Sign Board (Advertising)

2 1 20,000 40,000

Administrative cost 10% of cost

768,000



Sub-Total Cultural centre 7,708,000 2 Required Personnel for the Cultural Centre for the Waata and WaIlwana VMG communities

Designation No. RequiredCultural Officer 1 Office assistant/ Clerical Officer 2 Artisan 1 Security Personnel 2Subordinate Staff 2Total Personnel required 8

Grand Total Joint Livelihood Ventures (farmers training and Cultural centre) for the Waata and WaIlwana Communities of Tana River County

8,299,000

D. Livelihood Ventures for the Waata VMG Community of Kilifi County

D1: Deep Sea Fishing for Waata VMG communities of Kilifi CountyActivities / Sub-Activities Categor

yNo.

Villages

Qty Unit Cost Total Remarks

1a Support to Deep Sea FishingTarget Village BarakachembeGillnet: length 200 m *width 12 m 24 700 16,800Small Buoys(pieces) 400 30 12,000Medium buoys 8 600 4,800Floaters 300 20 6,000Ropes (200m length *2 ropes*2 nets* 12mm Thickness)

800 10 8,000

Net Sinkers(kg) 8 400 3,200Joining Ropes(rolls) 2 80 160Anchor chain (3m) 1 500 500Anchor (Boat anchor) 1 3,500 3,500Mooring ropes (20M) 20 30 600Anchor for stationery net 8 3,000 24,000Outboard Engine (40 Horse power, long chases Yamaha)

1 500,000 500,000

Life rings 1 6,000 6,000Life Jackets 8 4,000 32,000Boats(8 crew, fibre boat) 1 2,000,000 2,000,000Deep freezer (500Kgs) 2 120,000 240,000mooring buoys 1 500 500Cool boxes (500 Kgs) 1 30,000 30,000Mooring ropes (20M) 20 30 600TOTAL 2,888,660

1b Support to Deep Sea FishingTarget Village MajaoniGillnet: length 200 m *3m width * 2"* 3 ply (3 sets of nets)

1 36 800 28,800

Small Buoys(pieces) 1 600 30 18,000Floaters 1 600 30 18,000Ropes (200m length *2 ropes*3 nets* 12mm Thickness)

1 1,200

10 12,000

Sinkers(kg) 1 1,200

10 12,000

Joining Ropes(rolls) 1 6 80 480Boat anchor 1 1 3,500 3,500Output Engine (25 Horse power, long chases Yamaha)

1 1 400,000 400,000

Mooring chain (3M) 1 3 500 1,500Life rings 1 1 6,000 6,000Life Jackets 1 4 4,000 16,000



Mooring buoys 1 1 500 500Boats(4 crews -,fibre- boat) 1 1 2,000,000 2,000,000Mooring ropes (20M) 1 20 30 600Sub-totals 2,517,380

1c Support to Deep Sea FishingDabase

Gillnet: length 200 m *3m width * 2"* 3 ply (3 sets of nets)

1 36 800 28,800

Small Buoys(pieces) 1 600 30 18,000Floaters 1 600 30 18,000Ropes (200m length *2 ropes*3 nets* 12mm Thickness)

1 1,200 10 12,000

Sinkers(kg) 1 1,200 10 12,000Joining Ropes(rolls) 1 6 80 480Boat anchor 1 1 3,500 3,500Output Engine (25 Horse power, long chases Yamaha)

1 1 400,000 400,000

Mooring chain (3M) 1 3 500 1,500Life rings 1 1 6,000 6,000Life Jackets 1 4 4,000 16,000Mooring buoys 1 1 500 500Boats(4 crews, fibre boat) 1 1 2,000,00

02,000,000

Mooring ropes (20M) 1 20 30 600Sub-totals 2,517,380

2 Training on Deep Sea Fishing Target Villages Baraka Chembe and Majaoni

2a Training Category Days Qty Unit cost

Total

DSA (Two villages) 5 20 2,100 210,000Transport (Fishermen) 1 20 1,000 20,000Facilitation of training 0DSA (Fisheries officer) 5 1 11,200 56,000DSA (Assistant Fisheries officer) 5 1 6,300 31,500DSA(Director) 5 1 16,000 80,000DSA Driver 5 1 6,300 31,500Transport Fuel 1 30 110 3,300Refreshments 2 23 650 29,900Stationery 2 1 15,000 30000

2b Exchange visit to developed fishing activities

0

DSA (Fisheries officer) 4 1 11,200 44,800DSA (Assistant Fisheries officer) 4 1 6,300 25,200DSA(Director) 4 1 11,200 44,800DSA (Community) 4 6 3,000 72,000DSA Fisheries officer Host 4 2 1,000 8,000DSA (Host BMU) 5 2 500 5,000Transport Fuel 4 60 110 26,400Refreshments 4 17 650 44,200Stationery 1 1 15,000 15000Sub total 777,600

Sub-Total for Deep Sea Fishing Projects for Waata VMGs of Kilifi County 8,701,020D2: Agriculture projects for the Waata VMG community of Kilifi County

Activities / Sub-Activities Category

No. Villages


1a Green HouseTarget Villages MajaoniComplete standard size for dry areas: drip lines, inputs

Civil works

1 1 200,000 200,000



Water tank(2500 litres) including base and pipes

1 2 35,000 70,000

Fence (Barbed wire) 1 3 3,500 10,5001b Nursery to raise the seeds 0

Watering cans 1 2 600 1,200Wheelbarrow 1 2 4,000 8,000Spray pump; knapsack 1 1 15,000 15,000Jembe 1 4 600 2,400Panga 1 2 500 1,000Shovel 1 2 700 1,400Protective gears 1 2 10,000 20,000Weighing scale 1 1 5,000 5,000Crates 1 5 1,000 5,000Sub total 339,500

2 Tree NurseryTarget Villages Shirango A, Chamari and BombiRakes 3 4 500 6,000Watering cans 3 4 600 7,200Certified seeds(Assorted) 3 1 20,000 60,000Potting tubes 3 10 1,800 54,000Wheel barrow 3 2 4,000 24,000Pangas 3 4 500 6,000Shovel 3 4 700 8,400Jembe 3 4 600 7,200Shade net 3 1 150,000 450,000Pesticides/ foliar feed 3 1 10,000 30,000Pruning knives 3 4 300 3,600Farmyard manure 0 Farmers to

provideFence 3 1 50,000 150,000Sieve 3 1 1,000 3,000Spray pump; knapsack 3 1 15,000 45,000Sub-Total 854,400

3 Irrigated farmingTarget Villages: Bombi, Chamari

3a Irrigation facilitiesWater pump (diesel powered) 2 1 75,000 150,000Irrigation pipes and fittings 2 1 740,000 1,480,000Reservoir (10,000lt tanks) +support

2 1 300,000 600,000

3b Farm Inputs 0 0Ploughing 2 1 3,000 6,000Land Lease 2 1 3,000 6,000Certified seeds assorted seeds: maize, tomatoes,kales,Okrabrinjals,amaranthus, water melon, cassava cuttings, green grams, cow peas, pigeon peas, beans

2 1 17,500 35,000

Fertilizers 2 2 6,500 26,000Pesticides (Assorted) 2 1 25,000 50,000Jembe 2 10 600 12,000Panga 2 5 500 5,000Wheel barrow 2 2 4,000 16,000Protective gears 2 1 10,000 20,000Spray pump; knapsack 2 2 15,000 60,000Store (10 x 10m) 2 1 150,000 300,000Sub total 2,766,000

Sub-total for agricultural activities for the Waata VMG community in Kilifi County 3,959,900



Grand Total for Livelihood Micro-Projects for the Waata of Kilifi County

12,660,920

E. Livelihood Ventures for the Wachwaka VMG Community of Kwale County

E1: Deep Sea Fishing for Wachwaka VMG communities of Kwale CountyActivities / Sub-Activities Categor

yNo.

Villages

Qty Unit Cost

Total Remarks

1 Support to Deep Sea FishingTarget Village FikiriniNets(60*5m length*3 m* width) 15 5000 75,000Small Buoys 120 30 3,600Big buoys 6 800 4,800Floaters 15 5,000 75,000Ropes (300m*2*3nets*24mm) 600 70 42,000Sinkers 3 1,000 3,000Anchor (Boat anchor) 1 3,500 3,500Output Engine (25 Horse power, long chases Yamaha)

1 400,000

400,000

Life Jackets 8 4,000 32,000mooring buoys 1 500 500Boats(8 crew,hori) 1 500,00

0500,000

Tanga (sail) 1 3,000 3,000Mooring chain (3M) 3 500 1,500Mooring ropes (20M) 20 30 600Life rings 2 6,000 12,000Sub-Total for deep sea fishing for Wachwaka VMG community of Kwale County

1,156,500

E2: Agricultural activities for Wachwaka VMGs of Kwale County1 Irrigated farming

Target Villages: FikiriniIrrigation facilitiesWater pump (diesel powered) 1 1 75,000 75,000Irrigation pipes and fittings 1 1 740,000 740,000Reservoir (10,000lt tanks) +support 1 1 300,000 300,000Farm Inputs 1 0 0Ploughing 1 1 3,000 3,000Land Lease 1 1 3,000 3,000Certified seeds assorted seeds: maize, tomatoes,kales,Okra,brinjals,amaranthus, water melon, cassava cuttings, green grams, cow peas, pigeon peas, beans

1 1 17,500 17,500

Fertilizers 1 2 6,500 13,000Pesticides (Assorted) 1 1 25,000 25,000Jembe 1 10 600 6,000Panga 1 5 500 2,500Wheel barrow 1 2 4,000 8,000Protective gears 1 1 10,000 10,000Spray pump; knapsack 1 2 15,000 30,000Store (10 x 10m) 1 1 150,000 150,000

Sub total 1,383,0002 Rain-fed farming

Target Villages: FikiriniFarm Inputs



Ploughing 1 1 3,000 3,000Land Lease 1 1 3,000 3,000Certified seeds assorted seeds: maize, tomatoes, kales, Okra, brinjals, amaranthus, water melon, cassava cuttings, green grams, cow peas, pigeon peas, beans

1 1 17,500 17,500

Fertilizers 1 2 6,500 13,000Pesticides (Assorted) 1 1 25,000 25,000Jembe 1 10 600 6,000Panga 1 5 500 2,500Wheel barrow 1 2 4,000 8,000Protective gears 1 1 10,000 10,000Spray pump; knapsack 1 2 15,000 30,000Store (10 x 10m) 1 1 150,000 150,000Sub total 268,000

Sub-total agricultural activities for Wachwaka VMG community of Kwale County 1,651,000

Grand Total Livelihood Micro-Projects for the Wachwaka of Kwale County

2,807,500

F. Livelihood Ventures for the Wakifundi VMG Community of Kwale County

F1: Deep Sea Fishing for Wakifundi VMG communities of Kwale CountyActivities / Sub-Activities Categor

yNo.

Villages

Qty Unit Cost

Total Remarks

1 Support to Deep Sea FishingTarget Village Shimoni

1a Hand Line; No 90(4 rolls per packet) 5 600 3,000No 100(4 rolls per packet) 5 600 3,000No 120(4 rolls per packet) 5 600 3,000

1b

Hooks

No 5(2 boxes) 2 200 400No 4(2 Boxes) 2 200 400N0 6 (2 Boxes) 2 200 400Fishing curve 2 1,000 2,000Boat anchor 2 3,500 7,000Output Engine (15 Horse power, long chases Yamaha)

2 400,000 800,000

Life Jackets 10 4,000 40,000mooring buoys 2 500 1,000Boats(5 crew fibre boat) 2 1,000,00

02,000,000

Mooring chain (6M) 6 500 3,000Life rings 2 6,000 12,000Mooring ropes (20M) 40 30 1,200Sub-Total deep sea fishing for Wakifundi VMG community of Kwale County 2,867,400

Grand Total Livelihood micro-projects for Wakifundi of Kwale County

2,867,400

G. Livelihood Ventures for the Waata VMG Community of Kwale CountyG1: Aquaculture project for the Waata VMG community of Kwale County

Activities / Sub-Activities Category No. Qty Unit Total Remarks



Villages

Cost

1 Aquaculture Please note that the information on this micro-project is incomplete will need to be worked out with the fisheries expert on the ground as only the budget for the baseline survey has been estimated but not the actual cost of the micro-project. (Please counter check with the relevant excel sheet)

Target Village Kikobeni VillageBaseline survey (Water pan) DSA (Fisheries officer) 1 1 11,200 11,200DSA (Assistant Fisheries officer) 1 1 6,300 6,300DSA(Director) 1 1 16,000 16,000DSA Water and Irrigation officer 1 1 11,200 11,200DSA Driver 1 1 6,300 6,300Transport Fuel 1 70 110 7,700

Sub-total baseline survey for Aquaculture water pan for the Waata VMG of Kwale County

58,700

G2: Agriculture projects for the Waata VMG community of Kwale County1 Tree Nursery

Target Villages Kilibasi, Landi, Shirango B and KikobeniRakes 4 4 500 8,000Watering cans 4 4 600 9,600Certified seeds(Assorted) 4 1 20,000 80,000Potting tubes 4 10 1,800 72,000Wheel barrow 4 2 4,000 32,000Pangas 4 4 500 8,000Shovel 4 4 700 11,200Jembe 4 4 600 9,600Shade net 4 1 150,000 600,000Pesticides/ foliar feed 4 1 10,000 40,000Pruning knives 4 4 300 4,800Farmyard manure 0 0 Farmers to

provideFence 4 1 50,000 200,000Sieve 4 1 1,000 4,000Spray pump; knapsack 4 1 15,000 60,000Sub-total agricultural micro-projects 1,139,200

2 Irrigated farmingTarget Villages: Kilibasi, Landi, Shirango B and Kikobeni

2a Irrigation facilitiesWater pump (diesel powered) 4 1 75,000 300,000Irrigation pipes and fittings 4 1 740,000 2,960,000Reservoir (10,000lt tanks) +support 4 1 300,000 1,200,00

2b Farm Inputs 4 0 0Ploughing 4 1 3,000 12,000Land Lease 4 1 3,000 12,000Certified seeds assorted seeds: maize, tomatoes, kales, Okra, brinjals, amaranthus, water melon, cassava cuttings, green grams, cow peas, pigeon peas, beans

4 1 17,500 70,000

Fertilizers 4 2 6,500 52,000Pesticides (Assorted) 4 1 25,000 100,000Jembe 4 10 600 24,000Panga 4 5 500 10,000



Wheel barrow 4 2 4,000 32,000Protective gears 4 1 10,000 40,000Spray pump; knapsack 4 2 15,000 60,000Store (10 x 10m) 4 1 150,000 600,000

Sub total 4,273,200Sub-total agricultural activities for the Waata VMG community of Kwale county 5,412,400

Grand Total Livelihoodmicro-projects for the Waata of Kwale county 5,471,100

H. Livelihood Ventures for the Waata VMG Community of Taita Taveta County

H1: Agricultural micro-projectsActivities / Sub-Activities Category No.

Villages


1 Green HouseTarget Villages Birikani and KajireComplete standard size for dry areas: drip lines, inputs

Civil works

2 1 200,000 400,000

Water tank(2500 litres) including base and pipes

2 2 35,000 140,000

Fence (Barbed wire) 2 3 3,500 21,000Nursery to raise the seeds 0Watering cans 2 2 600 2,400Wheelbarrow 2 2 4,000 16,000Spray pump; knapsack 2 1 15,000 30,000Jembe 2 4 600 4,800Panga 2 2 500 2,000Shovel 2 2 700 2,800Protective gears 2 2 10,000 40,000Weighing scale 2 1 5,000 10,000Crates 2 5 1,000 10,000Sub total 679,000

2 Tree NurseryTarget Village BondeniRakes 1 4 500 2,000Watering cans 1 4 600 2,400Certified seeds(Assorted) 1 1 20,000 20,000Potting tubes 1 10 1,800 18,000Wheel barrow 1 2 4,000 8,000Pangas 1 4 500 2,000Shovel 1 4 700 2,800Jembe 1 4 600 2,400Shade net 1 1 150,000 150,000Pesticides/ foliar feed 1 1 10,000 10,000Pruning knives 1 4 300 1,200Farmyard manure 0 Farmers to

provideFence 1 1 50,000 50,000Sieve 1 1 1,000 1,000Spray pump; knapsack 1 1 15,0000 15,000Sub-Total 284,800

3 Irrigated farmingTarget Villages: Bondeni and Kisimeni

3a Irrigation facilitiesWater pump (diesel powered) 2 1 75,000 150,000Irrigation pipes and fittings 2 1 740,000 1,480,000Reservoir (10,000lt tanks) +support 2 1 300,000 600,000



3b Farm Inputs 0 0Ploughing 2 1 3,000 6,000Land Lease 2 1 3,000 6,000Certified seeds assorted seeds: maize, tomatoes, kales, Okra, brinjals, amaranthus, water melon, cassava cuttings, green grams, cow peas, pigeon peas, beans

2 1 17,500 35,000

Fertilizers 2 2 6,500 26,000Pesticides (Assorted) 2 1 25,000 50,000Jembe 2 10 600 12,000Panga 2 5 500 5,000Wheel barrow 2 2 4,000 16,000Protective gears 2 1 10,000 20,000Spray pump; knapsack 2 2 15,000 60,000Store (10 x 10m) 2 1 150,000 300,000Sub total 2,766,000

4 Rain-fed farmingTarget Villages: KisimeniFarm InputsPloughing 1 1 3,000 3,000Land Lease 1 1 3,000 3,000Certified seeds assorted seeds: maize, tomatoes, kales, Okra, brinjals, amaranthus, water melon, cassava cuttings, green grams, cow peas, pigeon peas, beans

1 1 17,500 17,500

Fertilizers 1 2 6,500 13,000Pesticides (Assorted) 1 1 25,000 25,000Jembe 1 10 600 6,000Panga 1 5 500 2,500Wheel barrow 1 2 4,000 8,000Protective gears 1 1 10,000 10,000Spray pump; knapsack 1 2 15,000 30,000Store (10 x 10m) 1 1 150,000 150,000Sub total 268,000

Sub-total Agricultural projects for Waata VMGs of Taita Taveta County 3,997,800

Grand Total Livelihood projects for the Waata of Taita Taveta County 3,997,800

F/G/H 1: Joint ToT for farmers from Kilifi, Kwale and Taita TavetaActivities / Sub-Activities No No.

VillagesQty Unit Cost Total Remarks

Training: 50 people ( 50 people from each county) TOTTarget villages 50 farmers selected from all farming villages in each

countyTraining materials 1 3 3 15,000 135,000Accommodation 50 3 3 1,500 675,000Venue 1 3 3 5,000 45,000Facilitators 5 3 3 15,000 675,000Transport (field visits) 1 3 1 50,000 150,000Refreshments 1 3 3 20,000 180,000meals 50 3 3 2,000 900,000Monitoring and evaluation 1 3 1 100,000 300,000

Sub-Total ToT for farmers from Kilifi, Taita Taveta and Kwale counties 3,060,000

I. Joint ventures for VMGs in Taita Taveta, Kwale and Kilifi counties



I1: Cultural Centers for VMGs in Kilifi, Kwale and Taita Taveta Counties1 Cultural Centre Waata of Kilifi; Wakifundi and Waata of Kwale; and Waata of Taita Taveta

Target Villages (11): Kwale County (Kikobeni, Kilibasi, Shimoni, Landi); Kilifi County ( Bombi, Mabuani, Debase, Matigani ); Taita Taveta County ( Bondeni, Birikani, Kisimeni )

Remarks

Land 3 To be provided by the community or respective County Governments

Fencing (Block fence with a gate) Civil works 3 1 1,000,000 3,000,000 It is assumed that only one cultural centre can be supported per county, with sections for each VMG community in the county, rather than for each community

Construction of a Hall Civil works 3 1 4,000,000 12,000,000

Traditional homesteads (Waata, Wakifundi and Wachwaka): Each traditional home among the 3 communities have 2 model houses (pre- marital house and post-marital house) using Grass & sticks & ropes and Mud & makuti & mangrove sticks (as appropriate)

3 1 10,000 30,000 This is for grass, sticks and ropes

1 4 30,000 120,000 This is for makuti and mangrove sticks

Plastic chairs for all the 3 centres Procurement

3 60 650 39,000

Purchase and collection of artefacts’ for museum (pots, beads, necklaces, cooking utensils, traditional mats, hides and skins , traditional seats & beds)

Procurement

3 3 200,000 600,000

Capacity building: awareness and sensitization

3 3 1,000,000 3,000,000

Construction and furnishing of an administration block (offices for staff, Store, Reception area and Accounts section)

Civil works 3 3 2,000,000 6,000,000

Construction of toilets for ladies and gentlemen (flush toilets)

3 12 300,000 3,600,000

Piped water reticulation 2 km (Kilifi -11km; Kwale- 13km; Taita Taveta- 5km): 20 pipes, metal poles, 5,000ltrs tank

Civil works 3 29 150,000 4,350,000

Office equipment (computer, printer, filing cabinet, furniture)

3 3 240,000 720,000

Solar Panels ( Kilifi) 3 1 100,000 100,000Website hosting 3 3 20,000 60,000Electrification (Kwale & Taita Taveta)

3 2 50,000 100,000

Signboard 3 3 20,000 60,000Administrative cost (10% of total cost)

3 910,065 3,370,900

Sub-total Joint Cultural Centre 37,149,900



I2: Ecotourism ventures the Wachwaka and Wakifundi VMGs in Kwale CountyActivities / Sub-Activities Category No.

Counties


1 Eco TourismTarget Villages: Shimoni and Fikirini (for the restoration of the slave caves) Remarks10 Km murram road 1 10 300,000 3,000,000Sign posts (one at Shimoni, Ukunda & Kwale)

1 3 20,000 60,000

Resting Shades 1 6 30,000 180,000Steps to the caves 1 - 5,000 5,000Marketing (Website & Advertisement)

0 0 Already taken care of in the cultural centre section

Sub-total 3,245,000Required Personnel (Cultural Centre)Designation RequiredOffice Administrator 1Tour guide 3Cleaning 1Security Personnel 2Accountant 1

Sub-total for eco-tourism for Wachwaka and Wakifundi of Kwale County 3,245,000

I3: Small Scale Enterprises for the Waata, Wakifundi and Wachwaka VMGs in Kilifi, Kwale and Taita Taveta counties

Enterprise Unit Cost Qty Frequency No. Villages Individuals

Total Remarks

1 Food and vegetable kiosk Villages in which to implement these enterprises would have to be identified during village forums Kwale, Kilifi and Taita Taveta VMG villages

Vegetables 2,500 1 3 16 5 600,000 Sugar 80 5 7 16 5 224,000 Maize flour 50 5 7 16 5 140,000 Beans 100 5 7 16 5 280,000 Rice 80 5 7 16 5 224,000 Bread 45 10 7 16 5 252,000

County license 3,000 1 1 16 5 5,000

Public health license 3,000 1 1 16 5

5,000

Rent 2,000 1 1 16 5 40,000

Transport100 1

7 16 5 56,000

Sub-total 1,826,0002 Indigenous Poultry business Villages in

which to implement these enterprises would have to be identified during village forums Kwale, Kilifi and Taita Taveta VMG villages

Hens 250 5 1 16 5 100,000 Cockerel 400 1 1 16 5 32,000 Feeds 40 1 12 16 5 38,400 Medicine 200 1 1 16 5 16,000 Sub-total 186,400

After 3 months Feed 8 56 12 16 5 430,080 Medicine 400 1 1 16 5 32,000 Sub-total 462,080 After 3 months Feed 8 106 12 16 5 814,080



Medicine 400 1 1 16 5 32,000 Sub-total 846,080

3 Stabilizing soil blocks Villages in which to implement these enterprises would have to be identified during village forums Kwale, Kilifi and Taita Taveta VMG villages

Investment costBrick making equipment 30,000 1 1 1 1 30,000 Operating costs 0 Maintenance 500 1 1 1 1 500 Brick making cost 2 300 25 1 1 15,000 Cement 700 2 25 1 1 35,000 Water 0.25 200 25 1 1 1,250 Transport 20 2 25 1 1 1,000 Marketing/Promotion 0.5 300 25 1 1 3,750

Sub-total 86,5004 Motor Bikes

Investment cost

Villages will be identified during village forums Kwale, Kilifi and Taita Taveta VMG villages

Motor Bikes 90,00

0 2 1 3 1 540,000

Operating costs 0

Insurance 7,000 2 1 3 1 42,000

Maintenance 300 2 3 3 1 5,400

Petrol 350 2 30 3 1 63,000

Sub-total 650,4005 Tents, chairs, sufurias, public address system Investment cost Unit price Qty Frequency Villages Individuals Total

Villages will be identified during village forums Kwale, Kilifi and Taita Taveta VMG villages

Tents 70,00

0 2 1 3 2 840,00

0

Chairs 60

0 100 1 3 2 360,00

0

Sufuria 20,00

0 2 1 3 2 240,00

0 Operating costs 0

Transport 1,00

0 1 4 3 2 24,00

0

Marketing 20

0 1 4 3 2 4,80

0

Cleaning 30

0 1 4 3 2 7,20

0 Sub-Total 1,476,0006 Samaki karanga na viazi karai Gharama za vifaa Unit price Qty Frequency Villages Individuals Total Villages in

which to implement these enterprises would have to be identified during village forums Kwale, Kilifi and Taita Taveta VMG villages

Chuma ya kuchomea 1,00

0 1

1

4 10 40,00

0

Miwok, Samaki 300 1 1

4 10 12,000 Sanduku ya samaki 700 2 1 4 10 56,000

Sanduku ya viazi 1,00

0 2

1 4 10 80,00

0

Karai 500 1

1 4 10 20,000

Jiko 500

2 1 4 10 40,000

Kijiko- Viazi 10

0

2

1 4 10 8,000 Operating costs 0



Fish 250

7

1 4 10 70,000 Potatoes 60 3 1 4 10 7,200

Cooking oil 200 4 1 4 10 32,000 Packets 50 3 1 4 10 6,000 Wheat flour 65 7 1 4 10 18,200 Food color 50 1 1 4 10 2,000 Salt, ukwaju etc. 50 1 1 4 10 2,000 Communication 50 1 1 4 10 2,000 Sub-total 395,400 7 Makuti

Makuti banda 50,000 1 1 1 1 50,000 Operating cost 0

Raw materials 5 4,000 1 1 1 20,000Makuti making 1 8,000 1 1 1 8,000

Robe 25 160 1 1 1 4,000 Sub-total 82,0008 Buying and selling of goats

Goats 3,50

0 10 3 1 1 105,000Transport 500 10 1 1 1 5,000

Communication 100 300Sub-total 110,300

9 Sea foods Cost of equipment Freezer 110,000 1 1 2 2 220,000 Operating costs 0

Fish 200 10 7 2 5 140,000 Lobster 800 5 7 2 5 280,000 Crabs 250 15 7 2 3 262,500 Transport 200 1 7 1 1 1,400

Communication 10

0 1 7 2 5 7,000 Sub-total 910,900Sub-Total Small Scale Enterprises for MVGs in Kilifi, Kwale and Taita Taveta counties

7,032,060

Grand Total Joint livelihood activities for MVGs in Kilifi, Kwale and Taita Taveta counties

50,486,960



J. Livelihood ventures for the Aweer VMG community of Lamu County

J1: Agriculture micro-projects for Aweer VMG Community of Lamu CountyActivities/sub-activities category No

Villages Unit Qty Unit cost Total Remarks

Agriculture 1a Fencing

Target Villages: Mangai, Madinah, Basuba,Kiangwi,Milimani, Mararani )Netted fence supported by bricks and cemented base including labour and materials

Civil works

6 Metre 4,200

3,000

75,600,000

per block

1b Farm Equipment ( 11 Villages) 0 50,400,000Forked jembe 6 No 1

0 450 27,00

0 75,600,000

Jembe 6 No 50

500 150,000 126,000,000

Panga 6 No 50

400 120,000

Files 6 No 5

200 6,000

Tractor (Basuba, Pandanguo)

2 No 2

##### 0 Needs a visit to the dealers

1c Bush clearing: (Mangai, Madinah, Pandanguo, Basuba villages) 0Slashing and stumping and removal of debris

4 Acre 100

31,500

12,600,000

Per acre

1d Farm inputs for: (Mangai, Madina, Basuba, Kiangwi, Panda Nguo, Milimani, Mararani villages)

0

Target crops: Maize, simsim, cassava, cowpeas, green grams, ground nuts and vegetables)

0

Certified seeds 7 8kg 100

350

245,000 per block/7 villages

Cassava cutting (kibanda meno)

1 4,000 100

2

800,000 Confirm costs and units from the county expert

CAN 7 50kg 100

2,500

1,750,000 per block/7 villages

Pesticides 7 litres 100

1,500

1,050,000

Foliar 7 litres 100

600 420,000

Knapsack spray pump 7 No. 2

2,500

35,000 2 pumps per block (village)

Protective gear 7 L/sum 2

6,000

84,000 2 people in a village

Sub-total crop farmingactivities 92,887,0002a Tree nursery - 50,000 seedlings (Mangai) 0

Wheelbarrow 1 No. 1

10,000

10,000

Potting tubes 1 Packets

50,000

3

150,000

Certified seeds (Causarina, mango, citrus & cashewnuts)

1 L/sum 1

56,000

56,000

Shade net 1 Rolls 1

100,000

100,000

Rakes 1 No. 25 50



2 0 0 Jembe 1 No.

2 500

1,000

Panga 1 No. 2

400

800

Watering cans 1 No. 2

650

1,300

Farm Yard Manure 1 Lorry 1

10,000

10,000

Fence 1 metres 400

380

152,000

2b Seedlings (Kiangwi village) 0Seedlings 1 No. 20,00

0 100

2,000,000

Sub-total seedlings 2,481,6003 Training: (11 villages) 0

Stationery ( 50 pieces) 7 L/sum 1

6,000

42,000

Fare reimbursement 7 No. 50

1,000

350,000

Accommodation 7 Pax 150

1,500

1,575,000

Facilitators 7 No. 6

15,000

630,000

Venue 7 Days 3

5,000

105,000

Field visits 7 L/sum 1

50,000

350,000


7 L/sum 1

50,000

350,000

Costing for technical backstopping 0 To be agreedSub-total training of Aweer VMGs community farmers 3,402,000

4 Posho mill (Milimani) 0Posho machine 1 No

1 200,000

200,000

Posho Mill housing 1 No 1

500,000

500,000

Installation and accessories 1 L/sum 1

200,000

200,000

Sub-total posho mill 900,000Sub-total Agricultural Projects for Aweer VMG Community of Lamu County 99,670,600

J2: Fisheries micro-projects for the Aweer VMG Community of Lamu CountyActivities/sub Activities Category No of

VillagesQty Unit Cost Total Remarks

1 Deep sea fishingTarget Villages Kiangwe, Mararani, Madina and NdununiGillnet: length 200 m *width 12 m

4 24 700 67,200

Small Buoys(pieces) 4 400 30 48,000Medium buoys 4 8 600 19,200Floaters 4 300 20 24,000Ropes (200m length *2 ropes*2 nets* 12mm Thickness)

4 800 10 32,000

Net Sinkers(kg) 4 8 400 12,800Joining Ropes(rolls) 4 2 80 640Anchor chain (3m) 4 1 500 2,000Anchor (Boat anchor) 4 1 3,500 14,000



Mooring ropes (20M) 4 20 30 2,400Anchor for stationery net 4 8 3,000 96,000Outboard Engine (25 Horse power, long chases Yamaha)

4 1 500,000 2,000,000

Life rings 4 1 6,000 24,000Life Jackets 4 8 4,000 128,000Boat (8crew, fibre boat) 4 1 4,500,000 18,000,000Deep freezer (500Kgs) 4 2 120,000 960,000mooring buoys 4 1 500 2,000Solar Cool boxes (500 Kgs)

4 1 60,000 240,000

Mooring ropes (20M) 4 20 30 2,400Sub-total 21,674,640

2 Support to Aqua- CultureTargeted Villages Mangai, Baragoni, Mararani, Basuba, Milimani and Pandanguo

Training on fish farming practices (TOT) will be at Sagana

2a Baseline survey 0Fuel Goods 1 200 110 22,000DSA (Fisheries officer) Services 2 6 4,200 50,400DSA (Officer) Services 1 6 6,300 37,800

2b Capacity building 0Training on fish farming practices

0

Fees 2 1 30,000 60,000Transport 2 2 9,000 36,000DSA 2 4 2,100 16,800Training on fish farming practices at Garsen

0

DSA (Community) Training 6 7 2,100 88,200Transport (Farmers) Training 6 2 3,000 36,000Facilitation of training 0DSA (Fisheries officer) 1 6 6,300 37,800DSA (Fisheries officer) 1 6 7,000 42,000Transport Fuel 1 60 110 6,600Conference package 1 6 5,000 30,000Stationery 1 1 15,000 15,000Refreshments 1 1 20,000 20,000

2c Pond set up 0Pond construction (1 for hatchery)

6 1 45,000 270,000

Purchase of pond liners 6 1 120,000 720,000Fencing (Chain link) 6 1 120,000 720,000Fencing (Chicken wire) against smaller animals-predators

400,000

Overhead nets 6 1 120,000 720,0002d Purchase of equipment's 0

Wheel barrows 6 1 5,000 30,000Jembes 6 6 400 14,400Pangas 6 5 600 18,000Compactors for soil compaction

6 5 500 15,000

2e Fingerling supply 0Purchase of fingerlings 5 1,000 10 50,000DSA Driver 1 2 4,200 8,400DSA Officer 1 2 6,300 12,600DSA Community 1 2 2,100 4,200Fuel 1 120 110 13,200Boat (hire to transport fish 1 1 24,000 24,000



seed)Transport for one community member

1 1 3,000 3,000

2f Fish feeds 0Purchase of fertilizer (DAP)

5 2 1,000 10,000


5 500 35 87,500

2g Harvesting 0Seine Net 5 1 10,000 50,000Scoop net 5 1 1,000 5,000Deep freezers 5 1 70,000 350,000Solar electricity 5 1 120,000 405,000Provision for supply of water

1 1 5,000,000

5,000,000

Sub-total Aquaculture 9,428,900Sub-total Fisheries Projects for Aweer VMG Community of Lamu County 31,103,540

J3: Small Scale Enterprises for the Aweer VMG community of Lamu County1 Micro-Project: Food Vending

Targeted Villages Mararani and Baragoni, 1a

Equipment’sUnit cost Qty Villages Days

Individuals Cost Remarks

Karai 800 1 2 1 5 8,000 Frying pan 500 1 2 1 5 5,000 Jiko 600 1 2 1 5 6,000 Utensils 600 1 2 1 5 6,000 Glasses 600 1 2 1 5 6,000 spoons 240 1 2 1 5 2,400 Sufuria 600 1 2 1 5 6,000 Hot pot 1,500 1 2 1 5 15,000 Rolling board 400 1 2 1 5 4,000 Jag 150 1 2 1 5 1,500 Table 3,500 2 2 1 5 70,000 Bench 2,000 4 2 1 5 80,000 Banda 15,000 1 2 1 5 150,000

1b Operating Costs 0 Unga ngano Kg 75 5

2 7 5 26,25

0 Oil 120 4

2 7 5 33,60

0 Sugar 40 1 2 7 5 2,800 Hamira 15 1 2 7 5 1,050 Iliki 10 1 2 7 5 700 Charcoal 30 1 2 7 5 2,100 Salt 10 1 2 7 5 700 Potatoes 100 1 2 7 5 7,000 Beans 80 1 2 7 5 5,600 Bojo 120 1 2 7 5 8,400 Onions & tomatoes 50 1 2 7 5 3,500 Rangi 20 1 2 7 5 1,400 Nazi 25 1 2 7 5 1,750 Rice 80 1 2 7 5 5,600 Sub-total Food vending 459,95

0 2 Kiosk/shop

Targeted Villages Pandanguo, Mangai, Basuba, Ndaiand Milimani

Confirm location of Ndai



2a Equipment Unit cost

Qty Villages Days Individuals

Cost

Weigh scale 5,000 1 5 5 5 625,000 Motor bike 110,000 1 2 1 1 220,000

2b Operating costs 0 Licenses 30 1 5 7 5 5,250 Transport 600 1 5 7 5 105,000 Fuel 300 2 1 7 1 4,200 Sugar 4,000 1 5 1 5 100,000 Oil 500 1 5 1 5 12,500 Bundle of maize flour 1,050 1 5 1 5 26,250 Sub-total kiosk/shop 1,098,200

3 Clothes Vending Target Village Kiangwe

3a Premises Banda 25,000 1 1 1 1 25,000

3b Operating costs Lesso 250 12 1 1 5 15,000 Dira na mtandio 500 12 1 1 5 30,000 Short 250 12 1 1 5 15,000 Shirt 250 12 1 1 5 15,000 T shirt 200 12 1 1 5 12,000 Mswani 150 12 1 1 5 9,000 Khamisi 300 12 1 1 5 18,000 Fare 2,500 1 1 1 1 2,500 Accommodation 1,000 1 1 1 1 1,000 Sub-total total clothes vending 142,500 Sub-total small scale enterprises for Aweer VMG Community of Lamu County 1,700,650

J4: Livestock micro-projects for Aweer VMGs of Lamu County1 Local Goats (3 goats per household)

Target villages: Pandanguo, Basuba, Milimani, Mararani, Kiangwi, Baragoni, Madina and Mangai (total of 862 households)Training (2 times) Services 8 1 2 470,1

00 7,521,600 2 trainings per

villageHousing Works 1 862 1 10,0

00 8,620,000

Purchase of East African goat-does (Kienyenji)

Goods 1 862 2 8,000 13,792,000

Purchase of he-goat (buck) Goods 1 862 1 8,000 6,896,000Transport for goats Services 1 1 1 300,000 300,000Medicine and acaricides and multivits

Goods 8 1 1 30,000

240,000

Spraying Equipment Goods 8 1 2 10,000

160,000

Mineral Supplements Goods 1 862 1 1,000

862,000

Follow up Services 4 1 2 470,100

3,760,800 2 villages per visit

Sub-total Kienyeji goats 42,152,4003 Local poultry

Target villages: Pandanguo, Milimani, Mararani, Kiangwi, Baragoni, Madina and Mangai (total of 796 households)Training (2 times) Services 7 1 2 470,100 6,581,400 2 trainings per

villageHousing Works 1 796 1 15,000 11,940,000Purchase of pullets (Kienyenji)

Goods 1 796 5 800 3,184,000

Transport for pullets Services 1 1 1 300,000 300,000



Medicine: (antibiotics, dudu dust) and vaccination (NCD, gumboro, fowl typhoid), de-wormers and multivits

Goods 7 1 1 30,000 210,000

Drinkers Goods 1 796 2 450 716,400Follow up Services 4 1 2 470,100 3,760,800 2 villages per

visitSub-total poultry 26,692,600

4 Support for Apiculture (Beekeeping)Target Village (1): Pandanguo, Mararani, Baragoni, Basuba and Mangai (a total of 709 households)Training (2 times) Services 5 1 2 470,100 940,200 2 trainings per

villageBeehives (Langstroth) No 1 709 3 5,000 10,635,000 3 hives per

HouseholdBee Keeping/harvesting Kit (Silk coverall kit, brush, knapsack. Gloves, veil, gumboots, smoker ,hive tool, hanging wire)

No 5 1 5 15,000 375,000

Honey Extractor No 5 1 1 75,000 375,000Honey Refractometer No 5 1 1 60,000 300,000Honey Setting Tank No 2 1 1 50,000 100,000Packing Tapes No 1 709 5 100 709,000Wax Extractor No 2 1 1 30,000 60,000Digital Weighing balance No 2 1 1 50,000 100,000Sealer Machine No 2 1 1 60,000 120,000Honey Processor No 2 1 2 120,000 240,000Harvesting Buckets No 1 709 2 50 70,900Plastic Jar ( 250 g / 500 g) No 1 709 2 1,000 709,000Follow up Services 3 1 470,100 1,410,300 2 villages per

visitSub-total poultry 16,144,400

Sub-total livestock micro-projects for Aweer VMG Community of Lamu County 84,989,400

Grand Total Livelihood Macro-Projects for Aweer of Lamu County 217,464,190

K. Livelihood ventures for the Sanye VMG community of Lamu County

K1: Agricultural activities for Sanye VMG community of Lamu CountyActivities/sub-activities category No


Agriculture 1a Farm Equipment 0

Forked jembe 4 No 10

450 18,000

Jembe 4 No 50

500 100,000

Panga 4 No 50

400 80,000

Files 4 No 5

200 4,000

1b Farm inputs 0Target crops: Maize, simsim, cassava, cowpeas, green grams, ground nuts and vegetables)

0

Certified seeds 4 8kg 100

350

140,000 per block/4 villages

CAN 4 50kg 10 2,50 1,000,000



0 0 Pesticides 4 litres 10

0 1,500

600,000

Foliar 4 litres 100

600 240,000

Knapsack spray pump 4 No. 2

2,500

20,000 2 pumps per block

Protective gear 4 L/sum 2

6,000

48,000 2 people in a village

2 Tree nursery (Shekale) 0 Seedlings 1 No. 20,00

0 100

2,000,000

Sub-total agricultural activities for the Sanye VMG community of Lamu County

4,250,000

5 Training: (11 villages) 0Stationery ( 50 pieces) 4 L/sum

1 6,000

24,000

Fare reimbursement 4 No. 50

1,000

200,000

Accommodation 4 Pax 150

1,500

900,000

Facilitators 4 No. 6

15,000

360,000

Venue 4 Days 3

5,000

60,000

Field visits 4 L/sum 1

50,000

200,000


4 L/sum 1

50,000

200,000

Sub-total for training for Sanye VMGs farmers 1,944,000Sub-total Agricultural Projects for Sanye VMG Community of Lamu County 6,194,000

K2: Fisheries micro-projects for the Sanye VMG Community of Lamu County1 Deep sea fishing

Target Villages Shekale, Bahati Njema, Kwadae and KizukeGillnet: length 200 m *width 12 m

4 24 700 67,200

Small Buoys(pieces) 4 400 30 48,000Medium buoys 4 8 600 19,200Floaters 4 300 20 24,000Ropes (200m length *2 ropes*2 nets* 12mm Thickness)

4 800 10 32,000

Net Sinkers(kg) 4 8 400 12,800Joining Ropes(rolls) 4 2 80 640Anchor chain (3m) 4 1 500 2,000Anchor (Boat anchor) 4 1 3,500 14,000Mooring ropes (20M) 4 20 30 2,400Anchor for stationery net 4 8 3,000 96,000Outboard Engine (25 Horse power, long chases Yamaha)

4 1 500,000

2,000,000

Life rings 4 1 6,000 24,000Life Jackets 4 8 4,000 128,000Boat (8 crew, fibre boat) 4 1 4,500,0

0018,000,000

Deep freezer (500Kgs) 4 2 120,000

960,000

mooring buoys 4 1 500 2,000Solar Cool boxes (500 Kgs) 4 1 60,000 240,000



Mooring ropes (20M) 4 20 30 2,400Sub-total 21,674,640

Sub-total Fisheries Projects for Sanye VMG Community of Lamu County 21,674,640

K3: Livestock enterprise for Sanye VMGs of Lamu CountyActivities/sub-activities category No


1 Cows-Kienyenji (50 cows for the village) although village has 150 households A household can only benefit from one livelihood micro-project

Target Village (1): ShekaleTraining (2 times) Services 1 1 2 470,100 940,200Housing structure without roof

Works 1 1 2 20,000 40,000

Watering drum and feeding platform

Goods 1 1 2 4,000 8,000

Purchase of cows Goods 1 1 30 30,000.00 900,000 Insemination services Services 1 4 30 1,000.00 120,000 Transport of the cows Services 1 1 1 300,000.00 300,000 Medicine (dewormers, mineral supplements, multivits and acaricides)

Goods 1 1 1 40,000 40,000

Veterinary services Services 1 1 30 2,000 60,000 Spraying Equipment Goods 1 1 2 6,000 12,000 Milk handling equipment (milk can

Goods 1 1 4 5,000 20,000

Follow up Services 1 1 2 470,100 940,200 2 villages per visit

Sub-total cows 3,380,4002 Local Goats (3 goats per household)

Target villages: Kizuke, Kwadae and Bahati Njema (total of 149 households)Training (2 times) Services 3 1 2 470,100 2,820,60

0 Housing Works 1 149 1 10,000 1,490,00

0 Purchase of East African goat-does (Kienyenji)

Goods 1 149 2 8,000 2,384,000

Purchase of he-goat (buck) Goods 1 149 1 8,000 1,192,000Transport for goats Services 1 1 1 300,000 300,00

0 Medicine and acaricides and multivits

Goods 3 1 1 30,000 90,000

Spraying Equipment Goods 3 1 2 10,000 60,000 Mineral Supplements Goods 1 149 1 1,000 149,000 Follow up Services 2 1 470,100 1,880,400 2 villages per

visitSub-total Kienyeji goats 10,366,000

3 Local poultryTarget villages: Kizuke, Kwadae and Bahati Njema (total of 149 households)Training (2 times) Services 3 1 2 470,100 2,820,60

0 2 trainings

Housing Works 1 149 1 15,000 2,235,000 Purchase of pullets (Kienyenji)

Goods 1 149 5 800 596,000

Transport for pullets Services 1 1 1 300,000 300,000

Medicine: (antibiotics, dudu dust) and vaccination (NCD, gumboro, fowl typhoid), de-wormers and multivits

Goods 3 1 1 30,000 90,000

Drinkers Goods 1 149 2 450 134,100



Follow up Services 2 1 470,100 1,880,400 2 villages per visit

Sub-total poultry 8,056,1004 Support for Apiculture (Beekeeping)

Target Village (1): Bahati Njema (total of 60 households)Training (2 times) Services 1 1 2 470,100 940,200 2 trainingsBeehives (Langstroth) No 1 60 3 5,000 900,000 3 hives per

HouseholdBee Keeping/harvesting Kit (Silk coverall kit, brush, knapsack. Gloves, veil, gumboots, smoker ,hive tool, hanging wire)

No 1 1 5 15,000 75,000

Honey Extractor No 1 1 1 75,000 75,000Honey Refractometer No 1 1 1 60,000 60,000Honey Setting Tank No 1 1 1 50,000 50,000Packing Tapes No 1 60 5 100 30,000Wax Extractor No 1 1 1 30,000 30,000Digital Weighing balance No 1 1 1 50,000 50,000Sealer Machine No 1 1 1 60,000 60,000Honey Processor No 1 1 2 120,000 240,000Harvesting Buckets No 1 60 2 50 6,000Plastic Jar ( 250 g / 500 g) No 1 60 2 1,000 120,000Follow up Services 1 1 470,100 470,000Sub-total poultry 3,106,200

Sub-total livestock micro-projects for Sanye VMG Community of Lamu County 24,908,700

K4: Small scale enterprises for the Sanye VMG community of Lamu County1 Micro-Project: Food Vending

Targeted Villages Shekale and Bahati Njema 1a

EquipmentUnit cost Qty Villages Days

Individuals Cost Remarks

Karai 800 1 2 1 5 8,000 Frying pan 500 1 2 1 5 5,000 Jiko 600 1 2 1 5 6,000 Utensils 600 1 2 1 5 6,000 Glasses 600 1 2 1 5 6,000 spoons 240 1 2 1 5 2,400 Sufuria 600 1 2 1 5 6,000 Hot pot 1,500 1 2 1 5 15,000 Rolling board 400 1 2 1 5 4,000 Jag 150 1 2 1 5 1,500 Table 3,500 2 2 1 5 70,000 Bench 2,000 4 2 1 5 80,000 Panda 15,000 1 2 1 5 150,000 1b Operating Costs 0

Unga ngano Kg 75 52 7 5

26,250

Oil 120 42 7 5

33,600

Sugar 40 1 2 7 5 2,800 Hamira 15 1 2 7 5 1,050 Iliki 10 1 2 7 5 700 Charcoal 30 1 2 7 5 2,100 Salt 10 1 2 7 5 700 Potatoes 100 1 2 7 5 7,000 Beans 80 1 2 7 5 5,600 Bojo 120 1 2 7 5 8,400 Onions & tomatoes 50 1 2 7 5 3,500



Rangi 20 1 2 7 5 1,400 Nazi 25 1 2 7 5 1,750 Rice 80 1 2 7 5 5,600

Sub-total food vending 460,3503 Micro- Project : Cereals Panda

Targeted Village Kizuke 3a Premises

Banda 25,000 1 1 1 1 25,000 3b Operating costs 0

Maize 20 90 1 4 20 144,000 Transport 100 1 1 4 20 8,000 Sub-total cereals Panda 177,000Sub-total Micro enterprises for Sanye VMG Community of Lamu County 637,350

Grand Total Livelihood Micro-Projects for Sanye of Lamu County 53,414,690

J/K: Joint eco-tourism venture for the Aweer and Sanye VMG communities of Lamu CountyActivities / Sub-Activities Categor

yNo. Villages

Qty Unit Cost

Total Remarks

EcotourismTarget Villages Shekale, Bahati Njema, Mangai and Kiangwi

1 Capacity Building on tree nursery establishmentFuelling of vehicle during training

4 400 100 40,000

Accommodation & Meals during training for 3 Nights

4 100 12,600 1,260,000

Mineral water, Tea & Snacks 4 110 400 44,000Stationery during training (pens, notebooks, masking tape, felt pens, felt pens)

4 100 200 20,000

DSA for Facilitators 4 3 36,600 109,800Transport for Facilitators 4 3 2,000 6,000Hire for projector during training 4 2 3,000 6,000Procurement of tree seedlings 4 60,00

040 2,400,000

Water Pump Generators 1 2 80,000.00

160,000

Water Pipes (20 ft.) PVC 1 20 200 4,000Water Tanks each 10,000 litres each

4 8 85,000.00

680,000

Transport for water tanks 4 8 65,000.00

520,000

Transport for seedlings 4 60,000

25,000 100,000

Fuelling of Water buzzers in Shekale, Kiangwi and Bahati Njema villages

3 9 trips 20,000 180,000

DSA for 2 Officers (Driver & Casual Labourer) for 3 nights each

3 6 6,300 37,800

Administration Cost 10% 556,760Sub-total tree nursery establishment 6,124,360

2 Camp site 0Fencing 10 ha of land around campsite: (Fencing + gate)

2 10 300,000 6,000,000

Campsite- Water (Borehole/ 2 1 1,500,00 3,000,000



shallow well - solar propelled) and water tank

0

Bathroom and toilet facilities 2 1 500,000 1,000,000Housing for security staff and Reception

2 1 1,000,000

2,000,000

Solar energy set 2 1 120,000 240,000Tented camps 2 10 20,000 400,000Marketing- Brochures 2 50,000Website hosting 2 50,000Sub-total camp site 12,740,000

3 Fibre glass motor boat 0Fibre glass motor boat + Life saver equipment

2 1 600,000 1,200,000

Sub-total fibre glass boat 1,200,0004 Capacity building: Training

and awareness forums by KWS2 1 1,000,00

02,000,000

Ostrich Rearing- Fencing + gate (10 Ha)

1 10 300,000 3,000,000

Solar water pump 1 1 900,000 900,000Capacity Building on ostrich rearing

1 1 1,500,000

1,500,000

Sourcing for ostrich Chicks 1 1 200,000 200,000Administration Cost 10% of cost- Lump sum

2,321,400

Sub-total Training/awareness creation by KWS 9,921,400

Grand Total Joint eco-tourism venture for Aweer and Sanye of Lamu County

29,985,760



Annex 2: Summary of Key messages from the validation workshops

1. Validation Process

This summary of the VMGP Validation workshop proceedings covers key issues emphasized during Opening Speeches and Workshop deliberations. The workshop process included the following five steps:

a) Opening remarks by County Officials, KCDP officials and VMGs representativesb) Technical Briefing to VMGs by County Resource Persons c) Village Focus Group Project Prioritization & Plenary Presentations/discussions d) Cost Estimates & Budgeting and Plenary Presentations/discussion e) Prioritization of Community Service Projects for 1st Funding in Plenary.

2. Critical Low Level of Education

The critical low level of education amongst the VMGs was recognized as a major factor in marginalization and the need to address it, preferably through some advocacy & affirmative action, as it affects all facets of their lives. KCDP has identified the challenge and is conducting a TNA for Youth Vocational Training to sponsor some to skill oriented courses. However a comprehensive strategy & support is required for any impact to be felt in the next 5 – 10 years. The Munyoyaya community reported that they currently have 7 graduates in their community and 5 are in the university. Other communities with any level of higher education could only report on secondary school leavers

It was further noted that improved education levels among the VMGs’ can also be an avenue for imparting effective Environmental Education & Awareness. (For example, theCommission for Gender and Equalization Commission confirmed during its public education forums in 2014, established that academic qualification poses major hindrance to the communities in marginalized areas to accessing readily available opportunities in private and public sectors. For instance in Isiolo County, the deputy governor informed the meeting that out of the three hundred applicants for Cabinet Executive Committee, they never received any from the Watta community in the county. The interactive forums confirmed that poverty and cultural practices and beliefs remain formidable contributors to high rate of School dropouts for young boys and girls and is perpetuated by the parents and the community Leadership at large. For Watta and Yiaku communities, 90% of the highest academic qualification attained is probably the Kenya Certificate of Primary Education (KCPE). The few with post-secondary education are unlikely to be serving in their communities due to limited opportunities and are scattered in the urban areas of Kenya and other countries).

3. Human Wildlife Conflict

The Human vs Wildlife conflict featured throughout the workshops as a major challenge &a cross-cutting issue affecting the VMGs’. KCDP acknowledged the menace exists and advised that for any meaningful solution, there is need for a consultative meeting with the affected communities to analyse the situation & chart a beneficial way forward. KWS, one of the KCDP implementing agencies, promised to spearhead this initiative with the VMGs.

4. Partnership with the Five County Governments



The need for close collaboration or partnership between KCDP & County Governments by aligning the KCDP work to the County Integrated Development Plan (CIDP) was emphasized. This is because both KCDP and the county governments have shared mandates towards VMGs, making it necessary for both to work together in contributing to the realization of article 56 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, and the County Government Act 2012Section 102 which defines service to Marginalized Groups & Minorities as a responsibility of the county governments. The Act specifies that the principles of planning and development facilitation in a county shall:

a) Protect and integrate rights and interest of minorities and marginalized groups and communities;b) Promote the pursuit of equity in resource allocation within the county;c) Provide a platform for unifying planning, budgeting, financing, programme implementation and performance

review; andd) Serve as a basis for engagement between county government and the citizenry, other stakeholders and interest

groups.

Commitment to the collaboration between county governments and KCDP was exemplified by the presence at the closing of the Lamu workshop by the Governor of Lamu County. The Governor committed to support the Wasanye and Aweer VMG communities in his county. KCDP should sensitize other Governors and county Chief Executive Officers on the need for collaboration, with particular emphasis on the role of the counties in integrating the comprehensive VGPs into the CIDPs and also in the sustainability of the CS projects that to be finance by KCDP. To this end, KCDP and the County Administrators will need to enter into collaboration MoUs in order to ensure:

That the role of County Resource Persons (technical experts) in providing technical back-up to VMG’s be available during implementation of the KCDP supported projects and that the same will continue after the KCDP life.

The harmonization of Projects done by KCDP & County Governments to avoid duplication & facilitation of setting of timeframes.

The recognition that livelihood projects alone cannot change the living standards of the VMGs without, concurrent provision of Community Service Projects like Water, Schools, Health -facilities, roads/bridges yet these projects can only be achieved through harnessing resources from County Governments & Constituency Development Funds and even Ward Development Funds. This may also require sensitization & lobbying of MP’s and MCA’s from VMG areas to take part too.

5. Sustainability

It was emphasized that sustainability and exit plans should be incorporated at the commencement of a project, hence the need for MoUs between KCDP and county governments at the start of implementation

6. Orientation of County Resource Persons

The majority of professionals in county government departments are rarely directly involved in Project Prioritization Costing and Budgeting, which traditionally is a domain of Planning, Financial and Procurement officials refer - The Public Procurement and Disposal Act (County Governments) Regulations, 2013.

When sourcing for technical experts who definitely are well qualified in their respective thematic areas, it is important to conduct timely orientation in preparation for the task ahead. It is important to give advance orientation Resources Persons from County Government or any agency to enable them adequately prepare consult & research, if necessary to deliver comprehensive guidance to the planning process. In the case of the VMGP developed, a possible checklist of information to county officials could include:



a) KCDP Project – HMP sub - componentb) Information on Target Groups –VMG’s backgroundc) The meaning & scope of sensitization of VMG’s on thematic areas- check listsd) Participatory planning – prioritization and value of technical informatione) Participatory Analysis, Prioritization, Cost estimation & Budgeting process (practical requirements)

With time KCDP would gather and document valuable presentations and analysis methods applied by various resource persons in their Knowledge Management e-library for future guidance of any officer in case of need. Indirectly KCDP will be building the capacity of County Officers for project sustainability.

7. Village level disclosure forums Schedule

The multi-layer disclosures/ Action Plan leading to commencement of project was scheduled to continue as follows

By Community starting from July, 2015 By KCDP from September, 2015 County level forums, September 2015 Start of implementation – October 2015

8. Exclusion of VMGs in the governance and decision-making systems

The following sentiments were expressed at the workshop:

Inadequate (and in some case none) representation of VMGs in the county and national governance systems due to the VMGs minority numbers, making them unable to compete for elective and nominative positions. This combined with their low levels of education, makes them unable to lobby meaningfully and successfully for such positions. (For instance, thewind in Isiolo County has tended to favor the five major communities for representationsegregating the minority groups such as the Watta whose numbers are significantly low. (The National Gender and Equalization Commission, during its visit to the Wata of Isiolofound that out of seven nomination slots, fivewere given to the five major communities (all male) with two women from the same communities taking up the other two slots, and non to the Wata).

9. KCDP: A God send

All VMGs participating in the workshops acknowledged KCDP as “God-sent” to enable them taste the fruits of “independence”. Most of them indicated that this was the first time since independence that they saw genuine efforts by government to reach out to them and they hoped the good will would bear fruit. Similar sentiments were expressed by County government officials who also acknowledged that the workshops gave them the first opportunity to interact with VMGs whose existence some of them had never known about.



Annex 3: Terms of Reference

Tor for Technical Assistance Consultancy Services for Training on Participatory Methodologies, Developing Action Plans for VMGs, Scrutinizing and Validating Management Plans, and Updating

the Process FrameworkIntroduction /background

The Government of Kenya is implementing the Kenya Coastal Development Project (KCDP) with financing from the International Development Association (IDA). The developmental objective of KCDP is to promote environmentally sustainable management of Kenya’s coastal and marine resources by strengthening the capacity of existing relevant government agencies and rural micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in selected coastal communities.

The project is comprised of the following four components:

Component 1:Sustainable Management of Fisheries Resources with the objective of increasing revenue earning potential of GoK through sound monitoring, control and surveillance and a transparent process of licensing of foreign vessels Component 2:Sound Management of Natural Resources which aims to improve the sound management and regeneration of natural resources and biodiversity in the coastal and marine environment; Component 3:Support for Alternative Livelihoods which aims to promote sustainable livelihoods within a sound governance framework; and,Component 4:Capacity building, Monitoring and Evaluation System, Project Management and Communication, Development Fund for the Coast (Hazina ya Maendeleo ya Pwani - HMP). Hazina ya Maendeleo ya Pwani (HMP) is a fund under the KCDP whose objective is to enhance natural resource conservation, social wellbeing and increased income for small and medium entrepreneurs in coastal counties. HMP is currently structured into the following windows: Window 1 - Grants to coastal communities to undertake natural resource management (NRM) sub projects; and Window 2 - Grants to coastal communities to undertake community service (CS) sub projects. KCDP is implemented by 7 agencies of the Government of Kenya (GoK) whose activities are coordinated by a centralized Project Coordinating Unit (PCU) based at the Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute (KMFRI).

To comply with the World Bank’s Operational Policy on indigenous peoples (OP 4.10), the Government of Kenya prepared the Indigenous People's Policy Framework (IPPF) to ensure that the development process fully respects the dignity, rights, economies, and cultures of these communities and that the project is able to gain broad support from the affected Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups.Purpose of the assignment

The Kenya Coastal Development Project (KCDP) wishes to engage an individual consultant to: 1) provide in-house technical assistance in training on participatory methodologies; 2) develop action plans for the Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups to benefit from the HMP; 3) scrutinize and validate the fisheries and other natural resources management plans that have been developed by the implementing agencies; 4) update the Process Framework for the target groups in the Boni-Dodori area and selected KCDP initiatives; and 5) supervise the on-going SIA Consultants to bring this work to successful completion.



Scope of work

The consultant shall be responsible for:

Training of HMP staff on participatory methodologies relevant to the project with focus on application of Participatory Integrated Community Development (PICD) process;

Training of communities on Participatory Integrated Community Development (PICD); Implement the PICD with staff so that the staff become trainer of trainers with communities; Identifying appropriate HMP activities and developing action plans for the Vulnerable and

Marginalized Groups (Indigenous Peoples) in the Lamu, Kilifi and Tana River Counties; Scrutinizing and validating the fisheries and other natural resources management plans that have

been developed by the implementing agencies through a process of community engagement; Ensuring VMGPs and the management plans are appropriately disclosed; Communicating the importance of natural Resources Management for the survival of

communities; Updating the current disclosed Process Framework for the management of natural resources in

Boni-Dodori area and other selected KCDP initiatives (for OP 4.12). This work will be carried out in the Lamu, Kilifi and Tana River Counties;

Supporting the GoK in supervising the ongoing SIA Consultants to ensure they complete their work in accordance with the TOR.

The field work will be carried out in the Lamu and Tana River Counties. The consultant will report to the Project Coordinator.

Deliverables

Key deliverables include the following reports:

Inception Report: specifying the approach and work plan in undertaking the consultancy and the proposed structure for the final report to be submitted within the first 7 days after signing the contract;A draft report: This report should be close to the final report reflecting the content of the final report. The consultant will present the draft report to the project staff and other key stakeholders to receive comments.

The final report: This should provide information on achievements in the following areas:

a) training on participatory methodologies;b) benefits of KCDP/HMP for Vulnerable and Marginalized groups;c) process of free, prior, and informed consultation with the affected Vulnerable and Marginalized

Groups;d) specific individual action plans for VMGs;e) accounts of the potential adverse impacts of KCDP on Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups(and

other stakeholders);f) evidence of participation of and free, prior, and informed consultation with Vulnerable and

Marginalized Groups during project implementation, monitoring, and evaluation;g) designed and disseminated grievance mechanism; and h) an updated Process Framework.

Progress Reports: the consultant will keep the Client informed about the progress of the assignment for on a monthly basis.VMGP Prepared by KCDP Team and VMGs with Facilitation and Report by Margaret Ombai of Tacitus Ltd Page 115


Qualifications and experience required

The consultant should be a social scientist of post graduate training with at least 10 years’ experience and be a proven expert in the implementation of the World Bank Safeguard policies (OP 4.10 and OP 4.12). An experienced social development practitioner with field experience in conducting training on Participatory Integrated Community Development (PICD), development of action plans and be conversant with implementation of local level community projects. The consultant must have:

Extensive experience in implementation of safeguard World Bank Policies in at least four projects (Written evidence must be produced);

Experience and knowledge of the KCDP Project focal area (Lamu, Kilifi and Tana River counties).

Duration of the assignment

The assignment is expected to take no more than sixty (60) working days. It should start immediately upon signing of the agreement.

Payment structure and timeframe

Payment terms will be as per the contract agreement and this will be based on completion of agreed milestones:

Payments shall be made according to the following schedule:

(i) 30% - Upon submission of the Inception report;(ii) 30% - Upon submission of a draft report;(iii) 40% - Upon delivery of the final report.

Data, local services, personnel and facilities to be provided by the Client

The KCDP will provide reports of the IPPF, Process Framework and land capability plans for use by the Consultant. A team of social scientists from the implementing agencies will accompany the Consultant to ensure adequate understanding of the arising social issues and recommended actions. All field logistics will be provided by KCDP to include, field assistance by KCDP staff, vehicles, and contact with County Governments.

Reporting requirements

The consultant will report to the KCDP Coordinator and work in close collaboration with the Project’s social scientists from the implementing agencies.

Disclosure

The reports will be published and made available to all Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups in the operational areas as a hard copy and through the project’s website and World Bank.

Annex 4: References

1. The Social Assessment Report by NAREM



2. The Draft VMGPs by NAREM3. The April 2010 Draft Process Framework4. Operations Manual: Natural Resource Management Project, Upper Tana Catchment, Livelihood Component

(May 2010); 5. The Fisheries, Mangrove Forests and Wildlife Management Pans 6. The Constitution of Kenya, 2010;7. OP 4.10 together with its Annexes A and B and C and OP 4.12.



Annex 5: Photo Gallery: Some Scenes from the VMGP Development Process



Annex 5: List of Participants to the VMGP planning sessions

The list of participants from the different VMGP planning sessions is already with KCDP.


documents.worldbank.orgdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/pt/524561468048855807/... · Web viewThe...

Documents

Transcript of documents.worldbank.orgdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/pt/524561468048855807/... · Web viewThe...