bescom.orgbescom.org/.../2014/12/Chapter6-analysis-of-FY-14.docx · Web viewCONSUMPTION TIPTUR...

Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited Truing up for FY-14 and ARR for FY-16

CHAPTER – 6

ANALYSIS OF TARIFF ORDER 2014

Commission issued the Tariff order for FY-14 on 06.05.2013 and the following issues are analyzed:

Sales and Revenue Fixed and variable cost Cross subsidy levels Source wise power purchase

I. Sales and Revenue : Approved V/s Actuals:

Sl No

Category Approved as per RST Actuals as per Final Account DifferenceSales-

MURevenue

Rs.RST Rate

Sales-MU Revenue Rs. Actual

rate

Sales-MU Revenue Rs.

ratecrores crores crores1 LT-1 55.2 27.82 5.04 51.06 31.06 6.08 -4.14 3.24 1.042 LT-2(a)(i) 4995.97 2227.85 4.46 4724.20 2154.05 4.56 -271.77 -73.80 0.103 LT-2(a)(ii) 562 205.49 3.66 558.29 215.08 3.85 -3.71 9.59 0.204 LT-2(b)(i) 36.7 25.37 6.91 31.36 21.50 6.86 -5.34 -3.87 -0.065 LT-2(b)(ii) 4.43 2.85 6.43 4.96 3.28 6.61 0.53 0.43 0.186 LT-3(i) 1574.3 1242.62 7.89 1417.85 1130.66 7.97 -156.45 -111.96 0.087 LT-3(ii) 99.04 75.49 7.62 119.06 87.17 7.32 20.02 11.68 -0.308 LT-4(a)(i)* 5660.37 854.72 1.51 5057.64 781.72 1.55 -602.73 -73.00 0.049 LT-4(a)(ii)* 115.52 17.44 1.51 180.45 0.00 64.93 -17.44 0.00

10 LT-4(b) 6.16 1.25 2.03 4.89 1.27 2.60 -1.27 0.02 0.5711 LT-4 (c) (i) 5.55 1.04 1.87 3.59 1.12 3.12 -1.96 0.08 1.2512 LT-4 (c) (ii) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0013 LT-5(a) 871.2 528.83 6.07 737.70 439.20 5.95 -133.50 -89.63 -0.1214 LT-5(b) 290.7 169.11 5.82 371.74 227.43 6.12 81.04 58.32 0.3015 LT-6 504.8 182.06 3.61 467.07 317.72 6.80 -37.73 135.66 3.2016 LT-6 418.48 202.68 4.84 394.45 271.09 6.87 -24.03 68.41 2.0317 LT-7 135.01 114.76 8.50 147.76 176.65 11.96 12.75 61.89 3.46 LT - TOTAL 15335.4 5879.38 3.83 14272.08 5859.00 4.11 -1063.35 -20.38 0.27

1 HT-1 521.18 221.2 4.24 612.92 265.57 4.33 91.74 44.37 0.092 HT-2(a)(i) 3491.23 2170.28 6.22 2520.89 1447.98 5.74 -970.34 -722.30 -0.473 HT-2(a)(ii) 2052.15 1260.93 6.14 2548.26 1524.28 5.98 496.11 263.35 -0.16

4 HT-2(b)(i) 3217.11 2579.7 8.02 2680.73 2096.56 7.82 -536.38 -483.14 -0.205 HT-2(b)(ii) 207.88 161.99 7.79 174.95 158.74 9.07 -32.93 -3.25 1.286 HT2©(I) 42.47 25.32 5.96 42.47 25.32 5.967 HT2©(ii) 47.21 42.25 8.95 47.21 42.25 8.958 HT-3(a)(i) 5.56 0.83 1.49 8.27 4.03 4.87 2.71 3.20 3.389 HT-3(a)(ii) 0.65 0.14 2.15 0.84 -10.50 -124.97 0.19 -10.64 -127.13

10 HT-3(a)(iii) 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0011 HT - 3b 0.16 0.05 3.13 0.11 0.08 7.39 -0.05 0.03 4.2712 HT-4(a) 129.56 69.8 5.39 109.75 62.99 5.74 -19.81 -6.81 0.3513 HT-5 16.69 16.08 9.63 46.90 21.96 4.68 30.21 5.88 -4.95 HT - TOTAL 9642.17 6481 6.72 8793.30 5639.26 6.41 -848.87 -841.74 -0.31 TOTAL 24977.6 12360.4 4.95 23065.37 11498.26 4.99 -1912.23 -862.12 0.04 Misc. Revenue 220.87 51.42 0.00 -169.45 0.00

Chapter 6 Page 67


Grand Total 24977.6 12581.3 5.04 23065.37 11549.68 5.01 -1912.23 -1031.57 -0.03Metered & un- metered and HT & LT sales ratios:

Particulars Approved ActualHT sales in MU 9642.17 8793.30LT sales in Mu 15335 14272.08Metered sales in Mu 19202 17827.28un metered in MU 5775.9 5238.10

HT sales to total sales 39% 38%LT sales to total sales 61% 62%Metered sales to total sales 77% 77%Un Metered sales to total sales 23% 23%Cross Subsidy Required under LT in Crs. 1845.1 1605Cross Subsidy Provided by HT in Crs. 1845.1 1092Short Cross subsidy 0 514Total Revenue in Crs. 12581 11550% of cross subsidy realised 15% 9%

On 06.05.2013, Commission approved tariff hike for the year FY-14 at an average of 24

paise per unit. In reality, the following points can be seen from the above table:

Average 24 paise per unit was obtained under LT category but not in HT

category.

Though the targeted sale are not achieved in both LT and HT categories, there is

huge financial impact for not achieving the targeted sales under HT ie., about

848 Mu less than the targeted sales resulting to revenue short of 842 Cr. which

means to say that the revenue is short by Rs.10 per unit.

There is a perfect match between, metered & un- metered sales and also HT &

LT sales ratios. However, the requisite cross subsidy component was reduced

due to less consumption in HT category sales from the approved sales. The

reduction in HT category sales in BMAZ area (Both Industrial and Commercial)

reduced the expected cross subsidy. A small extent of loss in cross subsidy is

also contributed to creation of new tariff for Hospitals and Education

institutions.

Chapter 6 Page 68


As per Tariff order 2013, the average tariff proposed to be increased was 24

paise/unit. Commission approved Non Tariff income to the tune of 8 paise per

unit out of the revised tariff increase of 24 paise per unit. The non tariff income

to 37% of average increase in tariff. Since this is non tariff revenue, it cannot be

expected before hand. Commission is requested not to consider the non tariff

income as estimated revenue while determining the tariff.

II. Fixed and Variable cost: Approved V/s Actuals & Proposed for Truing

up:

Approved & Actual Fixed and variable cost For FY-14

Particulars Approved CostsActual Costs as per

Accounts Proposed for Truing upFixed Variable Total Fixed Variable Total Fixed Variable Total

Generation2165.4 7686.2 9851.7

1405.2 8132.1 9537.3

1405.2 8132.1 9537.3

Transmission1063.1 1063.1

1310.9 1310.9

1310.9 1310.9

Distribution1583.5 1583.5 908.2 908.2

1451.8 1451.8

Regulatory Asset 82.9 82.9 82.9 82.9

Total4895.0 7686.2

12581.3

3624.2 8132.1

11756.3

4250.8 8132.1

12382.9

Sales in MU24977.6

23065.4

23065.4

Variable cost per unit 3.1 3.5 3.5Fixed cost per unit 2.0 1.6 1.8Total 5.0 5.1 5.4Realized 5.0 5.0 5.0

Break even24977.6

24542.5

28785.6

Deficit due to increase in variable cost 1034.3 1034.3Credit due to reduced fixed cost -896.1 -269.5Under recovery of cost due to less realization 79.9 79.9Total Deficit 218.1 844.7

From the above data, it could be seen that:

Actual variable cost per unit is higher than the approved variable cost. Though,

Fuel Cost Adjustment Charges (FAC) is in force from FY-14, it is not come to

Chapter 6 Page 69


rescue, actual fixed cost per unit is decreased against the approved fixed cost.

Reduction in the realization rate is also contributes for the Gap.

Commission is requested to revisit the FAC formula for faster recovery of

variable charges.

EXPENDI-TURE

Expenditure Vari-able cost 71%

Fixed Cost 29%

Chapter 6 Page 70

RECEPIT

Recepit Variable cost 71%

Fixed cost 13%

Fixed cost Inbu-lit cost 16%


III. Cross subsidy levels:

Category

Approved as per RST Revenue

@ approve

d ACS Rs.5.04 per unit

Cross subsidy

level

Actuals as per Final Accounts

Revenue @ ACS

Rs.5.23 per unit as per final

accounts

Revenue @ ACS

Rs.5.36per unit as

per proposed Truing up

Cross subsidy level as

per final account


proposed for truing

up Diff

Sales-MU

Revenue Rs.

Sales-MU

Revenue Rs.

croresin %

crores Rs. In crores

Rs. In crores in % in %

LT-1 55.2 27.8 27.8 100% 51.1 31.1 26.7 27.4 116% 113% 16%LT-2(a)

(i) 4996 2227.9 2518 88%4724.

2 2154.1 2470.8 2532.2 87% 85% -1%LT-2(a)

(ii) 562 205.5 283.2 73% 558.3 215.1 292 299.2 74% 72% 1%LT-2(b)

(i) 36.7 25.4 18.5 137% 31.4 21.5 16.4 16.8 131% 128% -6%LT-2(b)

(ii) 4.4 2.9 2.2 128% 5 3.3 2.6 2.7 126% 123% -1%

LT-3(i)1574.

3 1242.6 793.4 157%1417.

9 1130.7 741.5 760 152% 149% -4%

LT-3(ii) 99 75.5 49.9 151% 119.1 87.2 62.3 63.8 140% 137%-

11%LT-4(a)

(i)*5660.

4 854.7 2852.8 30%5057.

6 781.7 2645.1 2710.9 30% 29% 0%LT-4(a)

(ii)* 115.5 17.4 58.2 30% 180.5 0 94.4 96.7 0% 0%-

30%

LT-4(b) 6.2 1.3 3.1 40% 0 1.3 0 0-

40%LT-4 (c)

(i) 5.6 1 2.8 37% 4.9 1.1 2.6 2.6 44% 43% 7%LT-4 (c)

(ii) 0 0 0 3.6 0 1.9 1.9 0% 0% 0%

LT-5(a) 871.2 528.8 439.1 120% 737.7 439.2 385.8 395.4 114% 111% -7%

LT-5(b) 290.7 169.1 146.5 115% 371.7 227.4 194.4 199.3 117% 114% 2%

LT-6 504.8 182.1 254.4 72% 467.1 317.7 244.3 250.3 130% 127% 59%

LT-6 418.5 202.7 210.9 96% 394.5 271.1 206.3 211.4 131% 128% 35%

LT-7 135 114.8 68 169% 147.8 176.7 77.3 79.2 229% 223% 60%LT -

TOTAL1533

5 5879.4 7729.1 76%1427

2 5859 7464.3 7649.8 78% 77% 2%

Chapter 6 Page 71


Category Approved as per RST Revenue

@ approve

d ACS Rs.5.04 per unit

Cross subsidy

level

Actuals as per Final Accounts

Revenue @ ACS

Rs.5.23 per unit as per final

accounts

Revenue @ ACS

Rs.5.36per unit as

per proposed Truing up


per final account


proposed for truing

up Diff

Sales-MU

Revenue Rs.

Sales-MU

Revenue Rs.

croresin %

crores Rs. In crores

Rs. In crores in % in %

HT-1 521.2 221.2 262.7 84% 612.9 265.6 320.6 328.5 83% 81% -1%HT-2(a)

(i)3491.

2 2170.3 1759.6 123%2520.

9 1448 1318.4 1351.2 110% 107% -14%HT-2(a)

(ii)2052.

2 1260.9 1034.3 122%2548.

3 1524.3 1332.7 1365.9 114% 112% -8%HT-2(b)

(i)3217.

1 2579.7 1621.4 159%2680.

7 2096.6 1402 1436.9 150% 146% -10%HT-2(b)

(ii) 207.9 162 104.8 155% 174.9 158.7 91.5 93.8 173% 169% 19%

HT2(cI) 0 42.5 25.3 22.2 22.8 114% 111%114

%HT2©(ii

) 0 47.2 42.3 24.7 25.3 171% 167%171

%HT-3(a)

(i) 5.6 0.8 2.8 30% 8.3 4 4.3 4.4 93% 91% 64%HT-3(a)

(ii) 0.7 0.1 0.3 43% 0.8 -10.5 0.4 0.5 -2390% -2332% .HT-3(a)

(iii) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

HT - 3b 0.2 0.1 0.1 62% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 141% 138% 79%

HT-4(a) 129.6 69.8 65.3 107% 109.7 63 57.4 58.8 110% 107% 3%

HT-5 16.7 16.1 8.4 191% 46.9 22 24.5 25.1 90% 87%

-102

%

HT - TOTAL 9642 6481 4859.7 133% 8793 5639.3 4598.9 4713.2 123% 120% -11%

TOTAL2497

8 12360.4 12588.7 98%2306

5 11498.3 12063.2 12363 95% 93% -3%

Misc. Revenue 220.9 0 51.4 51.4 51.4 0%

Grand Total

24978 12581.3 12588.7 100%

23065 11549.7 12114.6 12414.5 95% 93% -5%

Chapter 6 Page 72


Based on the above table, cross subsidy level from different tariff approved V/s Actuals and

Proposed for truing up is computed as under:

Category Approved Cross subsidy level in %

Approved Cross subsidy level as per actual (Final accounts) in %

Approved Cross subsidy level as proposed in truing up in %

LT-2(a)(i) 88.48% 87.18% 85.07%LT-2(a)(ii) 72.55% 73.66% 71.87%LT-2(b)(i) 137.16% 131.09% 127.91%LT-3(i) 156.61% 152.48% 148.78%LT-3(ii) 151.23% 139.99% 136.60%LT-5(a) 120.44% 113.84% 111.08%LT-5(b) 115.42% 116.98% 114.14%LT-7 168.65% 228.59% 223.05%HT-2(a)(i) 123.34% 109.83% 107.16%HT-2(a)(ii) 121.91% 114.37% 111.60%HT-2(b)(i) 159.10% 149.54% 145.91%HT-2(b)(ii) 154.61% 173.49% 169.28%HT-4(a) 106.89% 109.74% 107.08%HT-5 191.16% 89.53% 87.36%HT - TOTAL 133.36% 122.62% 119.65%TOTAL 98.19% 95.32% 93.01%

Over all Cross Subsidy contribution is reduced by 3% as per final accounts and reduced

by 5% as per the ARR proposed for Truing up for FY-14.

Cross subsidy contribution to an extent of 14% is not realized from HT category. That

too in BMAZ area, it is 16% .

Increase in cross subsidy requirement by 3% under Domestic- urban (Tariff applicable

to Bangalore and urban areas) tariff further burdens the system.

Commission is truing up only the expenditure but not on the receipts. The Commission

is requested to carry the balance cross subsidy portion to the respective tariff while

determining the tariff.

Chapter 6 3


IV. Source wise power Purchase : Approved V/s Actuals:

SL No

Approved Actuals DifferenceName of the Generating

Station

Appd Energy in MUs

Cost of Energy Rs Cr

Unit Cost of

Energy Rs/Kwh

Actual Energy in Mus

Cost of Energy

in Cr

Unit cost of Energy Rs/Kwh

Energy in MU

Cost of energy

in Cr

1 KPCL HYDEL 3966.34 234.28 0.59 4032.59 203.69 0.51 66.25 -30.592 KPCL THERMAL 8701.92 3247.04 3.73 7308.54 2807.25 3.84 -1393.38 -439.793 CGS SUPPLY 6978.66 2066.85 2.96 6326.04 2165.73 3.42 -652.62 98.88

IPPS 4636.73 1918.15 4.14 3883.62 1676.03 4.32 -753.11 -242.125 NCE 3080.74 1094.2 3.55 3013.86 1072.87 3.56 -66.88 -21.336 SHORT - TERM

(approved)2801.05 1290.95 4.61

3893.37 1926.39 4.95 1092.32 635.44Others (prior period) 17.92 133.74 74.65 17.92 133.74

7 Energy balance -547.68 -213.44 3.90 -547.68 -213.44

TOTAL 30165.4 9851.47 3.27 27928.2 9772.26 3.50 -2237.20 -79.21

Transmission Charges 1063.13 1063.59 0.00 0.46

TOTAL 30165.4 10914.6 3.62 27928.2 10835.8 3.88 -2237.20 -78.75

It could be seen from the table that 2237.2 Mu of energy was less purchased, where as power

purchase cost reduced to an extent of Rs. 78.75 Crs.

For Analysis purpose, energy and the cost considered for energy balance is ignored and the

computation is as under:

SL No

Approved Actuals Computed energy cost for actual energy @ Commission approved rate

Addl Power purchase cost due to increase in cost/ unit

Name of the Generating

Station

Approved

Energy in MUs

Cost of Energy Rs Cr

Unit Cost of Energy

Rs/Kwh

Actual Energy in

Mus

Cost of Energy

in Cr

Unit cost of Energy

Rs/Kwh

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9=6*5 10=7-91 KPCL HYDEL 3966.34 234.28 0.59 4032.59 203.69 0.51 238.19 -34.502 KPCL

THERMAL8701.92 3247.04 3.73

7308.54 2807.25 3.84 2727.11 80.13

Chapter 6 Page 74


3 CGS SUPPLY 6978.66 2066.85 2.96 6326.04 2165.73 3.42 1873.56 292.17IPPS 4636.73 1918.15 4.14 3883.62 1676.03 4.32 1606.60 69.43

5 NCE 3080.74 1094.2 3.55 3013.86 1072.87 3.56 1070.44 2.426 SHORT -

TERM2801.05 1290.95 4.61

3893.37 1926.39 4.95 1794.38 132.01

TOTAL 30165.4 9851.47 3.27 28458.01 9851.96 3.46 9310.29 541.66

It could be seen from the above table, Power purchase cost per unit is increased from all sources except KPCL-Hydel. Break-up is as under:

SL No

Approved Actual Increase in PP.costName of the Generating

StationUnit Cost of

Energy Rs/Kwh

Unit cost of Energy Rs/Kwh

1 2 3 4 5=4-31 KPCL HYDEL 0.59 0.51 -0.092 KPCL THERMAL 3.73 3.84 0.113 CGS SUPPLY 2.96 3.42 0.464 IPPS 4.14 4.32 0.185 NCE 3.55 3.56 0.016 SHORT - TERM (approved) 4.61 4.95 0.34

TOTAL 3.27 3.46 0.20

Total Rs. 541.66 Crs. increased due to increase in the rates of power purchase.

81% of total increase ie.,, Rs.441.73 Crs. attributable to designated source ie., KPCL thermal, CGS and IPP’s,

24% of total increase ie., Rs.132.01 Crs increased due to increase in unit cost with respect to Short term

5% of savings to the total increase ie., Rs.34.5 in hydel and NCE sources reduces the burden .

There is urgent need in faster recovery of variance in the power purchase cost from the designated source.

Chapter 6 Page 75


Approved Vs Realized tariff – Tariff wise and Division wise

LT-Domestic (LT2a (i)): Actual rate of realization (Avg Rs.4.49 per unit) line is little bit higher

than Commission approved Tariff (Avg. Rs.4.45 per unit) It is good sign. However, Kengari, Peenya,

Rajarajeswari nagar and Rajajinagar Divisions of Bangalore Metropolitan Area shows the

realization below the approved level.

Chapter 6 Page 76


LT-Domestic (LT2a(i)) : Actual rate of realization (Avg Rs.3.69 per unit) line is little bit higher

than Commission approved Tariff (Avg. Rs.3.66 per unit) It is good sign. However, 50:50 % of

Rural Divisions are above and below the level of approved Tariff

LT-Comml (LT3a(i)) : Actual rate of realization (Avg Rs.7.86 per unit) is marginally ie., 3paise below

the Commission approved Tariff (Avg. Rs.7.89 per unit). However , Majority (8 divisions out of 13)

divisions of Bangalore Metropolitan Area, the realization rate below the approved level of Tariff.

Chapter 6 Page 77


LT-Comml (LT3a(ii)) : Actual rate of realization (Avg Rs.7.31 per unit) is far below the Commission

approved Tariff (Avg. Rs.7.62 per unit). Except Nelamangala , all Rural Division’s realization rate is

below the level of approved Tariff.

LT-Industrial (LT5a): Actual rate of realization (Avg Rs.5.95 per unit) is below the Commission

approved Tariff (Avg. Rs.6.07 per unit). However , Majority (7 divisions out of 13) divisions of

Chapter 6 Page 78


Bangalore Metropolitan Area, the realization rate below the approved level of Tariff.

LT-Industrial (LT5b): Actual rate of realization (Avg Rs.6.30 per unit) is above the Commission

approved Tariff (Avg. Rs.5.82 per unit). Except Kolar, Chintamain, Ramanagar, the rest of Rural

Divisions rate of realization is above the approved level .

LT-6 Water Supply: Actual rate of realization (Avg.6.97 per unit) line is abnormally higher the

Commission approved Tariff.

Chapter 6 Page 79


LT-6 Water Supply: Actual rate of realization (Avg.7.30 per unit) line is abnormally higher the

Commission approved Tariff

LT-6 Street light: Actual rate of realization (Avg.6.25 per unit) line is abnormally higher the

Commission approved Tariff(Avg. Rs.4.84 per unit) This abnormality in water supply and street light

actual rate of realization is included with the interest component. 30 to 75% of increase in rate over

Chapter 6 Page 80


the Commission approved rates is due to levy of interest on dues payable by local bodies.

LT-6 Street light: Actual rate of realization (Avg.8.11 per unit) line is abnormally higher the

Commission approved Tariff(Avg. Rs.4.84 per unit) This abnormality in water supply and street light in

actual realization rate whcih includes interest component. 30 to 75% of increase in rate over the

Commission approved rates is due to levy of interest on dues payable by local bodies.

LT-7 Temporary: Actual rate of realization (Avg.6.25 per unit) line is abnormally higher the

Commission approved Tariff may be due to higher weekly minimum.

Chapter 6 Page 81


LT-7 Temporary: Actual rate of realization (Avg.6.25 per unit) line is abnormally higher the

Commission approved Tariff may be due to higher weekly minimum

Chapter 6 Page 82


HT-1 Water Supply: Actual rate of realization (Avg.4.31 per unit) line is above the Commission

approved Tariff(Avg. rate Rs.4.24) Abnormal rate of realization in KGF, Hiriyur,

Chikkaballapur,Nelamangal,Chitradurga, Tiputur, Madhugiri and Kolar is mainly due to low

consumption .

Chapter 6 Page 83

HT-Water Supply


HT-2a(i) HT-Industrial: Actual rate of realization (Avg.5.37 per unit) line is much below the

Commission approvedTariff ( Avg. rate Rs.6.22).

HT-2a(ii) HT-Industrial(Rural): Actual rate of realization (Avg.5.74 per unit) line is much below the

Commission approved Tariff(Avg. rate Rs.6.14.

Chapter 6 Page 84

HT-2a(ii) HT-Industrial(Rural):

HT-Industrial-BBMP


HT-2b(i) Commercial(urban): Actual rate of realization (Avg.7.90 per unit) line is much below the

Commission approved Tariff(Avg. rate Rs.8.03).

HT-2b(ii) HT-Commll(Rural): Actual rate of realization (Avg.5.85per unit) line is much below the

Commission approved Tariff(Avg. rate Rs.7.79 per unit).

Chapter 6 Page 85

HT-Commercial-Rural

HT-Commercial-Urban


HT-2c(i) HT- Govt /Charitable Hospitals/Education institutions: As per earlier Tariff Order ie.,

30.04.2012, tariff applicable to this category is HT-industrial. Due to new categorization, realization

rate is droped to Rs.5.54 per unit as against Rs.5.73 per unit ie. ,Actual ARR of industrial tariff .

HT-2c(ii) HT- Private Hospitals/Education institutions: As per earlier Tariff Order ie., 30.04.2012,

tariff applicable to this category is HT-Comml. Due to new categorization, realization rate is dropped to

Rs.7.27 per unit as against Rs.8.02 per unit ie., actual ARR of Comml tariff

Chapter 6 Page 86

HT-2©(i)+Govt Hospitals and Education institutions


HT-4 Residentrial : : Actual rate of realization (Avg5.94per unit) line is higher than the Commission

approved Tariff(Avg. rate Rs.5.39 per unit).

HT-4 Temp : Actual rate of realization (Avg. 10.52per unit) line is higher than the Commission approved Tariff(Avg. rate Rs.9.63 per unit).

Chapter 6 Page 87

HT-Residential


Division wise Tariff wise consumption per installation in BESCOM

Domestic consumption per installation per month- Urban

TIPTU

R

NELAMANGALA

YELAHANKA

HIRIYUR

HARIHAR

CHITRADURGA

CB.PUR

MADHUGIRI

CHINTAMANI

TUMKUR

KENGER

I

DAVANAGERE

RAMNAGAR

PEENYA

KOLAR

RAJAJINAGAR

VIDHANASOUDHA

HEBBAL

H.S.R.LA

YOUT

RAJARAJESHW

ARINAGAR

MALLESH

WARAM

INDIRANAGAR

SHIVAJIN

AGAR

JAYANAGAR

KORAMANGALA

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

3.00

3.20

3.40

3.60

3.80

4.00

4.20

4.40

4.60

4.80

39 4448 49

55 58 58 59 61 61 62 62 62 65

90 9199 100 101 105 106 110 112

118123

3.95

4.50 4.55

4.023.90

3.97 3.95

3.75

4.384.29

4.11

4.60

3.99

4.26

3.56

4.37

4.574.50

4.66

4.29

4.544.65

4.574.64 4.64

Note; for the purpose of computation, only number of installations read and billed is considered

Domestic consumption per installation per month- Rural

HIRIYUR

MADHUGIRI

TIPTU

R

CHITRADURGA

CB.PUR

CHINTAMANI

K.G.FKOLA

R

NELAMANGALA

HARIHAR

TUMKUR

RAMNAGAR

DAVANAGERE

HEBBAL

YELAHANKA

KENGER

I

CHANDAPURA0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

3.00

3.20

3.40

3.60

3.80

4.00

4.20

4.40

4.60

4.80

17 18 19 22 25 25 25 26 28 28 29 29 31

44 45

57613.80

3.34

3.65

3.43

3.683.61

4.01

3.74

4.14

3.473.38

3.47

3.31 3.28

4.54

3.52

3.80

Chapter 6 Page 88


Note; for the purpose of computation, only number of installations read and billed is considered

Commercial consumption per installation per month- Urban

TIPTU

R

CHINTAMANI

HIRIYUR

CB.PUR

YELAHANKA

MADHUGIRI

CHITRADURGA

HARIHAR

RAMNAGAR

DAVANAGERE

TUMKUR

KOLAR

NELAMANGALA

KENGER

I

VIDHANASOUDHA

PEENYA

HEBBAL

RAJAJINAGAR

RAJARAJESHW

ARINAGAR

MALLESH

WARAM

SHIVAJIN

AGAR

JAYANAGAR

H.S.R.LA

YOUT

INDIRANAGAR

KORAMANGALA

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

6.00

6.50

7.00

7.50

8.00

8.50

9.00

9.50

59 71 74 80 81 83 84 91 99 101 104 108 113125 134

146166 172

195 198225

253 261

318 322

7.79

8.258.05

7.717.49

8.017.86 7.91 7.98

8.87

8.05

7.24

8.097.85

8.127.98 7.89 7.88

7.63

7.987.85 7.87 7.84 7.93

7.80

Commercial consumption per installation per month- Rural

CB.PURKOLA

R

CHINTAMANI

TIPTU

RK.G.F

TUMKUR

MADHUGIRI

HARIHAR

HIRIYUR

NELAMANGALA

CHITRADURGA

YELAHANKA

DAVANAGERE

RAMNAGAR

CHANDAPURA

HEBBAL

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

6.50

6.70

6.90

7.10

7.30

7.50

7.70

7.90

8.10

8.30

8.50

7582 84 88 92 93 94

100 101 104 108

122 123

144

166

193

7.54

7.21

6.94

7.33

7.096.97

7.487.55

7.43

8.35

7.14

7.46

7.00

7.20

6.91

7.34

Chapter 6 Page 89


IP consumption per installation per month

TIPTU

R

RAMNAGAR

HARIHAR

DAVANAGERE

CHITRADURGA

HIRIYUR

K.G.F

MADHUGIRI

CB.PURKOLA

R

CHANDAPURA

CHINTAMANI

PEENYA

YELAHANKA

NELAMANGALA

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1.00

1.10

1.20

1.30

1.40

1.50

1.60

1.70

1.80

1.90

2.00

457492 521 526 548

583636 659

701 716

805839 850

1374

1471

1.47 1.46 1.47 1.471.42

1.51 1.48 1.48 1.471.51

1.46 1.461.50 1.51

1.83

LT-Industrial –Urban < 5HP

INDIRANAGAR

SHIVAJIN

AGAR

PEENYA

H.S.R.LA

YOUT

RAJAJINAGAR

HEBBAL

VIDHANASOUDHA

MALLESH

WARAM

KENGER

I

JAYANAGAR

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

7.50

8.00

124150 156

184 188 200

346 366403

561

5.81

5.465.69

5.485.21

5.86

7.38

6.39 6.376.06

Chapter 6 Page 90


LT-Industrial–Rural<5HP

CHITRADURGA

NELAMANGALA

DAVANAGERE

TUMKUR

HARIHAR

RAMNAGAR

CB.PURTIP

TUR

CHINTAMANI

MADHUGIRIK.G.F

HEBBAL

CHANDAPURAKOLA

R0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

48

85 88 96 98 107120

131 135 137154

214

259

330

5.53

6.796.51

6.155.80 5.66

5.91

4.855.32

3.25

5.95

5.30

7.24

3.49

LT-Industrial –Urban -5 to 40 HP

SHIVAJIN

AGAR

JAYANAGAR

INDIRANAGAR

HEBBAL

PEENYA

H.S.R.LA

YOUT

MALLESH

WARAM

VIDHANASOUDHA

RAJAJINAGAR

KENGER

I

RAJARAJESHW

ARINAGAR

KORAMANGALA

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

438 438 512 516 619 622 628792 829 904

1027

3054

5.38

6.096.54

5.68 5.91 6.02 5.94

3.82

5.72 5.865.53

8.90

Chapter 6 Page 91


LT-Industrial –Rural -5 to 40 HP

MADHUGIRI

CHITRADURGA

HIRIYUR

TIPTU

R

HARIHARKOLA

R

CB.PUR

DAVANAGERE

TUMKUR

YELAHANKA

NELAMANGALA

HEBBAL

CHINTAMANI

RAMNAGAR

CHANDAPURA0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

7.50

8.00

145186

209 210 229 235 248

332 336

396421 441

494520

799

7.28

7.76

7.33

6.19

5.78 5.76

6.02

6.37

5.72

6.12

5.725.87

5.475.34

6.25

LT-Industrial –Urban -40 to 67 HP

KORAMANGALA

MALLESH

WARAM

HEBBAL

SHIVAJIN

AGAR

H.S.R.LA

YOUT

PEENYA

INDIRANAGAR

VIDHANASOUDHA

JAYANAGAR

RAJAJINAGAR

RAJARAJESHW

ARINAGAR

KENGER

I0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

7.50

338

1205

25733035 3154

3456 36154085 4088 4191

5558 57577.11

6.04 6.006.19 6.14 6.06

4.78

5.61

6.32

5.84 5.82 5.91

Chapter 6 Page 92


LT-Industrial –Rural -40 to 67 HP

KOLAR

HARIHARTIP

TUR

NELAMANGALA

YELAHANKA

CB.PUR

DAVANAGERE

CHANDAPURAK.G.F

MADHUGIRI

RAMNAGAR

TUMKUR

CHITRADURGA

CHINTAMANI

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

11.00

12.00

3201075

2143 2268 2363

3691 37924335

62896791 7071

10159

11409

19773

9.29

7.45

5.52

6.92 7.00 6.95

11.05

6.81

9.67

7.096.86

5.99 6.046.32

Chapter 6 Page 93

bescom.orgbescom.org/.../2014/12/Chapter6-analysis-of-FY-14.docx · Web viewCONSUMPTION TIPTUR...

Documents

Transcript of bescom.orgbescom.org/.../2014/12/Chapter6-analysis-of-FY-14.docx · Web viewCONSUMPTION TIPTUR...