zoesoroko.files.wordpress.com · Web viewCelestina. Done in Picasso’s Blue Period, which took...
Transcript of zoesoroko.files.wordpress.com · Web viewCelestina. Done in Picasso’s Blue Period, which took...
Zofia Soroko
21 st century Spanish art- A Linear Progression
Spain- A beautiful country with an incredibly diverse landscape and a history
of separation (both culturally and physically) from the majority of continental
Europe. This peninsula is segmented by mountain chains and plateaus, removed
from France via the Pyrenees, and vastly different from the cultures of France and
the like due to 400+ years of influence from the Umayyad remnants (which escaped
the Middle East to rule and survive in the Iberian peninsula). But despite this degree
of separation and the strong nationalism (and regionalism) of Spain, does this
modern age of electronic connectivity alter the art of Spain? Has the pastiching and
cultural trends that have defined Spain as a cultural presence vanished to make
room for new global trends? In this essay I will argue that Spain, while of course
taking in modern trends from around the world, has continued in their specific style
and still looks back and takes inspiration from their proud and unique history, and
that Modern and Contemporary art in Spain looks back to the greatest artists of
Spain to create a strong sense of identity and cultural connection that forces the
artists into the timeline of Spanish artistic progression.
Spain, as a country, has always been a bit of an “outsider” due to its place on
the continent. As a peninsula covered in mountains, it was set aside from the rest of
the country (and, in fact, divided amongst itself). The people of Asturias and Galicia
are known to have many customs shared with the Celtic people, the south shares
many North African design elements (as the Strait of Gibraltar is only 8.9 miles
1
across at its narrowest point, making it a short and fairly easy trip from Spain to
Morocco. With the addition of the Muslim Umayyad dynasty that entered Spain in
711 and ruled Spain almost entirely until the 1100s (before being officially removed
in 1492), Spain as a country is incredibly diverse and foreign with a rich history of
many different cultures merging together at an entirely different level when
compared to other European countries.
As we move forward in time into the 16th century, the art of Spain retained
many of its stylistic and thematic elements. Take, for example, Doménikos
Theotokópoulos, referenced here as “El Greco”. As one of the most widely
recognized painters and sculptors of the Spanish Renaissance, El Greco’s dramatic
and proto-expressionistic style retained many of the elements of Spanish style that
were passed down throughout the centuries. Despite being from Greece, his move to
Spain and connection to the art world and culture made him (like the many
immigrants to the Iberian Peninsula before him) an honorary Spaniard. After all,
Spain is one European country that historically integrates outsiders in (as long as
they are Roman Catholic). While his style is decidedly more Italian, his Mannerist
emphasis on hyper-elegance and his experimental compositions seemed to harken
back to the romantic and intense Dutch masters, who were quite the favorite of
Ferdinand and Isabella.
Indeed, El Greco’s works were highly emotional and dramatic, themed
around religious stories or containing references to his own faith. One of his most
prized paintings, The Burial of Count Orgaz, features a long-time benefactor of Santo
2
Tomé in Toledo. Most of El Greco’s patrons were wealthy churchgoers and religious
figures, and as a devout Catholic himself his works featured many religious figures
or allusions to the Catholic faith. Count Orgaz is pictured in the arms of several
church members, surrounded by mourners of both the earthly and heavenly variety.
At the height of the painting is Jesus, eyes cast away. The rendering of the figures,
while realistic, captures a certain eerie light- the contrast is sharp, making all of the
faces seem angular. The clouds also have “edges”, and appear to be more stagnant
then the airy Baroque clouds that were surging their way through Italy.
El Greco’s work in Spain was not always so well received, however. During
this time period, being commissioned by the King was the height of accomplishment
(unless of course, you consulted Velázquez, who quickly grew jaded at his role). In
April of 1580 he was supplied with colors and asked to complete a depiction of The
Martyrdom of Saint Maurice for the monastery church of the Escorial. Yet, as
evidenced by the work commissioned to replace it a few months later (this work
was completed by Romulo Cincinnato, an Italian by birth), King Philip II was less
than pleased. El Greco found his patrons through his faith- a devout Catholic, El
Greco was fueled by fervor (and some would say madness).
As El Greco grew and matured, that angular quality took over. Completed just
before his death in 1614, Laocoön and his sons is the most visibly angular of all of his
works. The painting, which references the Grecian legend of Laocoön and his sons
(who were killed by serpents for angering the gods), still contains religious and local
undertones in keeping with Spanish tradition. The background features the city of
3
Toledo, which references a local legend that the people of Toledo are the
descendants of Trojans (with Troy being the setting of the original story). Toledo is
depicted as a gloomy and grey city, surrounded by turmoil. Turbulent clouds
dominate the sky, and the whole world seems cast in shades of grey. While the
elongated figures are clearly Mannerist, the harsh forms are nearly segmented by
shadows. On the right of the frame, the on looking figures are abstracted into a
vague smoky blob, their features barely ascertainable from the washes of light and
dark.
Another of his works of note was The Vision of Saint John- even further
abstracted from his depiction of Laöcoon and sons, this piece is almost unreadable.
Also called Breaking the Fifth Seal, the faces are all distorted, figures smoky and
vague, and the background unplaceable- this piece would read as modern even in
today’s galleries. While retaining the Spanish painting tradition of heightened
emotion, hidden meaning and religion, The Vision of Saint John not only keeps with
Spanish traditions and legends, but also laid down the groundwork for the next
great Spanish artist I will discuss- Pablo Picasso.
Described by Afred Warner as “the El Greco of our time”, Picasso’s constant
controversy with his patrons, innovative spirit, and unorthodox painting methods
all bear a striking resemblance to El Greco’s own experience. It is no question as to
whether or not Picasso saw any of El Greco’s works- upon seeing the
aforementioned work Picasso said it had reconfirmed his faith in his “alma
Española”, or Spanish Soul. He called El Greco the “ultimate Spaniard”- a man who
4
painted the spirit and “felt the mystical inner construction of life”. This truth is
reflected in Picasso’s work, particularly his Rose and Blue Periods.
Starting with his Blue Period, which took place from 1901-1904, the
monochromatic blue-greens served as a palette that washed all of his figures with
melancholy emotions, often showing signs of “El Greco-esque” sharpness and
angularity. Take, for example, Picasso’s 1903 work Celestina. Done in Picasso’s Blue
Period, which took place from 1901 to 1904, the melancholy and monochromatic
style resembles El Greco’s works, particularly the expressions and tenebrism of The
Burial of Count Orgaz. This particular painting (and many of his Rose Period pieces
depicting carnival workers) also recalls the Casta Paintings of the colonies- the idea
of painting the local people within your country despite class or profession existed
far before the 19th century Realist movement, although the meaning behind the
colonial depictions were more moralizing than sympathetic. While the Casta
paintings were primarily designed to imply that Spanish blood was better than any
other group, their popularity grew as people of all backgrounds saw themselves
represented for the first time. While Picasso was in no way implying that one group
was better than another, his representations of the performers and prostitutes also
served as a kind of demographic survey- this time representing not different races,
but rather the people who worked in the shadowy undesirable jobs that many
people preferred to ignore. Spain above all other countries has a history of depicting
its people, for its people were what made it so unique. Picasso’s depiction of this
fortune-teller (and his later works, namely Acrobate et Juene Arlequin and Family in
5
Saltimbanques) echoes this realistic depiction of hard-working people living difficult
and unique lives that was so characteristic of Spanish art, particularly in the
colonies. Despite the fact the Picasso produced much of his work in France, his work
is still inspired by his experiences and early life in Spain, as well as his deep
connection to his heritage and to Spanish artistic tradition. While he did live in Paris,
his art reflects his Spanish roots far more than his place of residence.
As we move past Picasso’s early career, we begin his shift into Cubism.
Although inspired by Cezanne’s geometric treatment of light and color, the
chiaroscuro and degradation of the human form mirrors the later works of El Greco,
namely the 1608 painting Opening of the Fifth Seal. El Greco’s treatment of light and
color is arguably closer to Picasso’s early cubist works than Cezanne is- the harsh
shadows create dramatic lines that slice through the drapery and background,
breaking most of the forms into basic angular shapes. As Picasso once said, “Nature
and art cannot be the same thing!”- this is evidenced in both Picasso and El Greco’s
elongated, Mannerist, abstracted forms. This dramatic departure from the norm was
shocking to all other modern artists, with even close collaborator Georges Braque
comparing his painting style to “drinking petrol in the hope of spitting fire”.
One of Picasso’s most famous cubist works was his 1907 piece Les
Demoiselles d’Avignon. While the title is French, the location and subjects of the work
are decidedly Spanish. Inspired by the prostitutes of Spain (specifically the women
of Carrer d’Avinyó in Barcelona), Picasso depicts 4/5 women (depending on the
interpretation of the “masked” woman as a reflection or as her own character) in the
6
nude, several of their faces morphed into forms resembling African masks, a popular
artistic import of the time period. Picasso also said that he drew much of his
inspiration from archaic Iberian sculpture, once again proving the strong connection
between Spanish artists and their frequent pastiching of Iberian arts. As seen in the
image below, the facial shapes of the Iberian sculpture closely matches the angular
features and almond-shaped eyes of the women in Les Demoiselles d’Avignon.
Figure 1: Iberian female sculpture from 3rd century
BCE
These women are a direct reflection of his childhood events, as he spent
much of his formative teenage years hanging around brothels and interacting with
the women there. He described these women as insecure, and recalled the painting
as “[his] first exorcism”, viewing the figures and their emotional connection to his
own childhood in Spain as his innermost demons.
Picasso’s Baroque inspiration was not only drawn from El Greco, but from
classically beautiful court painter Diego Rodríguez de Silva y Velázquez. Born in
Figure 2: Detail of Les Demoiselles d’Avignon
7
1599, Velázquez studied painting and quickly ascended to the coveted position as
leading artist in the court of King Philip IV. One of his most renowned works is the
famous Las Meninas, an oil work painted in 1656 that not only served as royal
portraiture, but as a work that bends perspective and calls attention to the many
audiences of the work. In the 1656 piece, Velázquez paints Princess Margaret as the
focus, yet portrays himself as the clear artist, using the idea of the many ways this
scene is viewed to his advantage. In the painting, the gathering of people is viewed
from the back (where a man stands in the doorway), by the King and Queen (whose
portrait appears in the back left-hand side), by the viewer of the portrait, and by the
artist himself, whose angle seems impossible to allow for the kind of painting he is
completing. The work is hailed as one of the best portraits in the world, and for good
reason- yet Velázquez was never truly happy in his life and always strove to achieve
more and more. Velázquez’s cross, displayed prominently on his chest, was the
highest honor a court painter could achieve, and was possibly even added
posthumously to the portrait as a means of elevating the man behind the image even
further. Picasso was transfixed by Las Meninas, completing 58 painting variations on
the classic portrait. Picasso tends to focus these works on the artist himself,
expanding Velázquez’s cross marker to a towering structure- the symbol of status
elevated to the entirety of his being. The idea that an artist could be so well loved by
his government and his people was exciting to Picasso, and the artist as a member of
society with accolades and courtly achievements captured his imagination. Picasso
took this famous portrait and changed various elements, recreating the image but
8
with a new intention 58 times over. One of the biggest changes Picasso made was
increasing the size of Velázquez and the Cross of Saint James on his chest, having the
artist dominate the entire image. By focusing the image onto Velázquez’s Cross of
Saint James, the painting becomes not about the princess or the people in the image,
but rather an emphasis on the role of the artist in Spanish society. This referencing
and research of Spanish art once again marks Picasso as an artist intent on
continuing the tradition of Spanish influence into modern artworks.
9
Figure 3: Las Meninas, Velázquez, 1656 Figure 4: Las Meninas, Picasso, 1957
Picasso, like many modern and contemporary artists, drew his inspiration
from his Spanish identity, no matter how far away he travelled. A painting of his
with a fierce connection to his Spanish identity was his work Guernica. Painted in
1937 as a response to the Sunday morning market bombing in Guernica, Spain, this
stunning black and white work captures the horror and suffering inflicted by a
government onto its own people. Cattle, horses, children, and men all lay strewn in a
bustling street, as the eye above (representative of the eye of God) is off, blind to the
atrocities below. While obviously representative of an entirely Spanish subject
matter, the piece also has signs of a pastiche of 2 other Spanish artists- Zurburán of
the 17th century and Goya of the 19th century. Both of these artists used heavy,
velvety black backgrounds, both to contrast their works and to provide a stronger
emotional punch.
One of the best examples of this in Zurburán’s work is his piece The
Crucifixion. In this depiction of Christ on the cross, the all-enveloping black of the
background seems to suck in all sources of light and contrasts heavily with the pale
skin and fabric of the Christ figure. This rich darkness creates a somber and heavy
tone, and is also seen in many of his still lives (which often have religious
connotations of the virtues of an impoverished life) and in his work Lamb of God, a
reference to the crucifixion in which a lamb takes the place of Jesus Christ. With
Guernica, the piece embodies both the somber emotions of looking back at the event
and the horror of the moment. The black used creates a void, which forces the mind
10
to focus on the events and emotions unfolding in front of you. Both pieces tell you
what you are viewing with their title, but without the title the viewer still
understands the sorrow and
tragedy of the scene. Another
similarity is in the abstraction of
what is being depicted. Picasso
uses visual abstraction in his
cubist forms, but despite the realism of Zurburán’s painting the subject is
abstracted. Instead of a traditional image of the crucifixion, Zurburán chose to
substitute a lamb (a symbol of Jesus). The lamb embodies the sorrow and
acceptance that Christ had for his own death without showing you the actual event,
making Zurburán’s work also abstracted.
Figure 5: Agnus Dei, Zurburán, 1640 Figure 6:
Guernica, Picasso, 1937
Goya too relied on heavy black backgrounds
to showcase the emotional qualities of his pieces.
His series “Black Paintings” was done entirely on black background that seems to
swallow the viewer. One of these pieces is Saturn Devouring His Son, which shows
the Titan Saturn consuming his god-children (depicted here as adults). The piece,
which was a representation of his struggles with his own children as well as his fear
of being consumed by his age (as Saturn is also a symbol akin to Father Time), plays
11
well with the black background, which once again serves as a consuming void in
which swallows hope with somber darkness. In this case, the comparison with
Guernica is once again in the use of black as a vacuum to further emphasize the
horror and shock of the events depicted in the image. The heavy background of Goya
makes the image of Saturn consuming his son even more vibrant and aggressive.
Picasso uses this method, evidenced in both of these Spanish pieces. He sets
Guernica, a moment of such horror and destruction, against a void that swallows all
hope, all reason, all joy, forcing the viewer to focus their attention on the emotion
and terror emanating from the abstracted people and animals in the aftermath of
the bombings.
Figure 7: Saturn Devouring His Son, Goya, 1819-1823
Picasso was an incredibly prolific artist, creating works from the 1890’s
(where he studied under his father after being admitted to art school at just 16
years old) to his death in 1973. Despite working predominantly in Paris, he
constantly referenced the artists of his ancestral home, calling El Greco the “ultimate
Spaniard”, drawing inspiration from his childhood, and even looking back to what
12
the archaic Iberian artists depicted his caves and clay. But his work in the Cubist
style as been added to the timeline of great Spanish artists, and is now being used to
inspire a wave of new contemporary artists who also call Spain their home. Take, for
example, contemporary artist José Manuel Merello. Born in Madrid, Spain in 1960,
he self-admittedly drew his early inspiration from the works of Picasso and Frida
Kahlo. As he states in his writings, their abstracted, surrealist style is incorporated
messily in his modern, colorful, and avant-garde works, continuing the tradition of
historic Spanish influence on modern artists.
One of his works, entitled Blue Vase, is comparable in style to Picasso’s Still
life with Vase, painted in 1944 in his cubist style (which worked using the concept of
4 dimensional structures flattening onto the 2 dimensional canvas). The harsh lines
and many-edged forms are to be read as many views of the same object, as if the
artist was viewing and depicting all sides at once. In both works the background is a
series of geometric forms, and the vases are flattened and sharp with many edges.
While Merello’s color scheme is much more vibrant and his images are more
flattened, the reference to Picasso’s cubism is clearly evident. The bright colors and
flat styling even seem to reference some of Picasso’s earlier synthetic cubist works
(such as Picasso’s 1921 collage Three Musicians). Merello uses this original Post
Cubist style throughout the majority of his works, from Catalina to Don Quijote
Alucinado.
13
Figure 8: Still Life with Flowers and Lemons, Picasso, 1941 Figure 9: Blue Vase, Merello,
Merello uses his works as a platform to showcase his culture, his heritage,
and his background. The aforementioned work (Don Quijote Alucinado) is a visual
representation of a world-renowned Spanish novel which follows the life and trials
of Don Quijote, a 17th century “knight” best known for its famous windmill scene.
After reading so many chivalric romance novels, he loses his mind and sets out to
revive chivalry and bring justice back to the world. The work is considered to be the
most influential work of literature from the Golden Age of Spain, and thus is deeply
rooted in the culture and history of Spain.
14
Figure 10: Don Quijote Alucinado, Merello
Not only does Merello openly discuss his Spanish/Hispanic sources of
inspiration, but the subject matter of his works are predominantly the people
(women) of Spain. With titles such as Spanish Girl and Espanola, the people and
scenes depicted are clearly Spanish and labeled as such, once again reveling in
Spanish heritage and identity.
By choosing to emulate and draw inspiration from Picasso, Merello is
bringing the proud tradition of Iberian pastiching and influence forward into the
21st century. From the archaic caves to the Middle Ages, through the Inquisition and
into the age of cellphones and art shows, Spain has remained deeply invested in its
own culture and heritage, choosing to make the effort to support and represent its
past more so than any other country. Their geographic layout separated them, but it
is their art that sets them apart. The artists of Spain are uniquely connected to their
sense of Spanish identity, choosing to reference specifically Spanish artists in their
modern works. Spain has always been deeply connected to its own unique identity
and has shown its love and appreciation of its unique style since the age of
colonialism and conquest. These artists have highlighted their identity through their
references to their country’s art and artists and have thus woven their art
permanently into their culture’s heritage. By associating themselves with the greats
15
of Spain, they have ensured that their art will forever be remembered in the timeline
of artistic progression.
Works Cited
Baetjer, Katharine. "El Greco." The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 39.1, El Greco (1981): n. pag. JSTOR. Web. 26 Apr. 2017.Merello, José Manuel. "Escritorios Sueltos." Arte Moderno.- Merello, Obra Reciente. Ltimas Pinturas 2008 Y 2009. Exposiciones Actuales. Madrid, Valencia. Galeras De Arte. N.p., 2008. Web. 26 Apr. 2017.Pijoan, Joseph. "El Greco-A Spaniard." The Art Bulletin 12.1 (1930): 12. Web.Werner, Alfred. "The Unknown Picasso." The Massachusetts Review 2.2 (1961): 349-54.JSTOR. Web. 26 Apr. 2017.
16