, the Internet, and the Information Commons Universities, the Internet, and the Information Commons...
-
date post
22-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of , the Internet, and the Information Commons Universities, the Internet, and the Information Commons...
Universities, the Internet, and the , the Internet, and the Information CommonsInformation Commons
Hal Abelson [email protected] Dept. of Electrical Eng. and Computer. Sci.
MIT Council on Educational Technology
2
• Question: How is the Internet going to be used in education, and what is your university going to do about it?
• An answer from the MIT Faculty is this: Use it to provide free access to the primary materials for virtually all our courses. We are going to make our educational material available to students, faculty, and other learners, anywhere in the world, at any time, for free.
MIT President Charles VestPresident’s Report, Fall 2001
3
Site Highlights
Syllabus
Course Calendar
Lecture Notes
Assignments
Exams
Problem/Solution Sets
Labs and Projects
Hypertextbooks
Simulations
Tools and Tutorials
Video Lectures
4
Legal details
• Participation by faculty is voluntary
• Faculty retain copyright, but grant MIT an irrevocable nonexclusive license to include their material in OCW
• MIT publishes OCW under a Creative Commons license– Attribution– Noncommercial– Share-alike
5
OCW Site TrafficMIT OCW Monthly Traffic (since 10/1/03)
6
13.9 M137.2 M
17.8 M
61.7 M
7.8 M
50.4 M
2.6 M
19.6 M
4.3 M
RegionHits Since 10/1/03
Hit %
North America 137,154,920 43.5East Asia 61,706,485 19.6Western Europe 50,372,337 16.0South Asia 19,558,358 6.2Latin America 17,826,440 5.7Eastern Europe and Central Asia
13,942,007 4.4
MENA 7,748,165 2.5Pacific 4,249,296 1.3Sub-Sahar. Africa
2,551,284 0.8
TOTAL HITS 315,109,292
Traffic by Geographic Region (in Web hits, since 10/1/03)
7
Educators
Self-learners
Students
Oth
ers
13%
4%
52%
31%
8
OCW Recognition
April 20, 2004
The Webby Awards
January 29, 2003
Kyoto (Japan) Digital
Archive Project
October 15, 2003
Microsoft Internet
Biz Solution of Year
October 21, 2003
Mass. Interactive
Media Council (2)
November 10, 2003
InfoWorld 100 Award
June 7, 2004
ComputerWorld
Honors Program
September 29, 2004
Digital Education
Achievement Award
C E R T I F I E D………………………
Business SolutionsPartner
October 18, 2004
MarCom Creative
Awards (2)
9
OCW Translations
• 60 courses in Spanish and Portuguesethrough Universia.net partnership
• Individual courses in 10 languages• Extensive translation efforts beginning in
China and Taiwan
10
11
Other universities are starting their own
OpenCourseWare projects
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DSpace
• Vision – A federated repository that makes available the
collective intellectual resources of the world's leading research institutions
• Mission– Create a scalable digital repository that preserves and
communicates the intellectual output of MIT's faculty and researchers
– Support adoption by and federation with other institutions
• Implemented by MIT Libraries staff working together with Hewlett-Packard Laboratories and the World Wide Web Consortium
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Range of DSpace content at MIT
• Preprints, articles• Technical reports• Working papers• Conference papers• Theses• Datasets
– Statistical, geospatial, biological, etc.
• Images– Visual, scientific, etc.
• Audio and video recordings of lectures, and other multimedia objects
• Learning objects• Reformatted digital
library collections
DSpace will be the archive for OpenCourseWare
28
DSpace Technology
• Open-source implementation, freely available
• A digital library standard and architecture including:– Metadata based on Web Consortium’s RDF– Access control– Collection management tools– Federation architecture
29
More than 100 Dspace
instances
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
MITOPENCOURSEWAREMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Two coordinated initiatives to strengthen the information commons
40
Why should universities build repositories like DSpace and OpenCourseWare?
41
Why should universities build repositories like DSpace and OpenCourseWare?• Without initiatives like these, traditional
academic values will be increasingly marginalized, and university communities will be increasingly stressed.
42
University of Southern California
As an academic institution, USC's purpose is to promote and foster the creation of intellectual property. It is antithetical to this purpose for USC to play any part, even inadvertently, in the violation of the intellectual property rights of others.
September 2002, letter to USC students from the Dean of Libraries
43
Many students probably create a work that would infringe a faculty member's copyright, that is, they base their notes on and incorporate her particular expression rather than just state facts and ideas she articulates in more detail. Faculty members have always permitted this kind of activity without actually talking about it. They “implicitly” license students to create a “derivative work” from the lecture. The license is implied through academic tradition -- students are expected to take notes. …
Now faculty may wish to make the implied license explicit and add some restrictions.
A limited license to take notes could be very important to protecting the intellectual content of lecture materials …
University of Texas, Office of the General Counsel, August 2001 http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/lectures.htm>
44
The suggested license …Written and verbal instructions at the beginning of class could look something like this:
My lectures are protected by state common law and federal copyright law. They are my own original expression and I record them at the same time that I deliver them in order to secure protection. Whereas you are authorized to take notes in class thereby creating a derivative work from my lecture, the authorization extends only to making one set of notes for your own personal use and no other use. You are not authorized to record my lectures, to provide your notes to anyone else or to make any commercial use of them without express prior permission from me.
University of Texas, Office of the General Counsel, August 2001 http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/lectures.htm
45
Corynne McSherry
Who Owns Academic Work?
Harvard University Press, 2001
46
Conflating “freedom of inquiry” with “freedom of property”
Intellectual property law … embodies the notion that the only forms of cultural work that can be “protected” are those that can be owned. …
… the conflation of property rights and “academic rights” participates in a set of discourses … in which freedom can only be understood to mean “individual free enterprise.”
In retelling this tale academics risk losing a language for talking about knowledge as other than private property and the university as other than economically “useful.”
Corynne McSherry, Who Owns Academic Work? (2001)
47
Why should universities build repositories like DSpace and OpenCourseWare? (2)
• Without initiatives like these, traditional academic values will be increasingly marginalized, and university communities will be increasingly stressed.
• To keep a seat at the table in decisions about the disposition of knowledge in the information age.
48
Challenges to universities from the “propertization” of scientific publication• Cost
• Imposition of arbitrary, inconsistent rules
• Impediments to new tools that could aid scholarly research
• Danger of monopoly ownership and control of the scientific literature
49
50
Scientific literature as property:The basic deal
• Scientist authors give their property away to the journal publishers.
• Publishers own this property and all rights to it forever, and they magnanimously allow the scientist author to retain some limited rights that are determined at the publisher’s sole discretion.
• The university generally gets no specific rights.• And the public doesn’t enter into this deal at all.
51
Some rights generously granted to authors by Elsevier
• the right to include the article in full or in part in a thesis or dissertation (provided that this is not to be published commercially)
• the right to present the article at a meeting or conference and to distribute copies of such paper or article to the delegates attending the meeting;
• the right to prepare other derivative works, to extend the article into book-length form, …
• the right to post a revised personal version of the text of the final article … on the author's personal or institutional web site or server
authors.elsevier.com - 2004
52
Some rights generously granted to authors by the Journal of the American Chemical Society
• Authors may distribute or transmit their own paper to not more than 50 colleagues
• Authors may post the title, abstract (no other text), tables, and figures from their own papers on their own Web sites
paragon.acs.org - 2004
53
and from the New England Journal of Medicine…
The Massachusetts Medical Society is the owner of all copyright to any work published by the Society. … The Society and its licensees have the right to use, reproduce, transmit, derive works from, publish, and distribute the contribution, in the Journal or otherwise, in any form or medium. Authors will not use or authorize the use of the contribution without the Society’s written consent, except as may be allowed by U.S. fair-use law.
authors.nejm.org/Misc/MsSubInstr.asp - 2004
54
We make this deal because …
Maintaining the integrity of the publication process is vital, be it in print or online. … It is not a process that should be ceded to unknown individuals … Copyright should not be ceded to individual authors who would not be able to undertake the job of protecting their work from the introduction of errors.
Ira Mellman, Editor, Journal of Cell Biology
55
What’s valuable for promoting the progress of science?
• Quality publications and a publication process with integrity, certainly. But also …
• Open, extensible indexes into publications• Automatic extraction of relevant selections from
publications• Automatic compilation of publication fragments• Static and dynamic links among publications, publication
fragments, and primary data• Data mining across multiple publications• Automatic linking of publications to visualization tools• Integration into the semantic web• And hundreds of things no one has thought of yet
56
One publisher’s view
We aim to give scientists desktop access to all the information they need, for a reasonable price, and to ensure that the value of the content and the context in which it is presented are reflected in the information provision. The information is made available to researchers under licenses accorded to their institutes, and they have all the access they wish.
57
One publisher’s view
Private monopoly control of the scientific record.
58
promoting the progress of science and the useful arts
Will universities have a seat at the bargaining table?
Institutional players jockeying for influence and control
For-profit publishers
Professional societies
Non-profit publishers
…
selection
production
authoritative source
dissemination
indexingdata mining
review
new access tools
creation
preservation
quality assurance
59
promoting the progress of science and the useful arts
Will creators have a seat at the bargaining table?
Institutional players jockeying for influence and control
For-profit publishers
Professional societies
Non-profit publishers
…
selection
production
authoritative source
dissemination
indexingdata mining
review
new access tools
creation
preservation
quality assurance
60
61
62
Copyright law makes it difficult to build on each other’s work
all rights reserved© might not be the right choice for all
of the people all of the time.This is the default.
public domain:no rights reserved
might be the right choice for some of the people some of the time.This is surprisingly hard to do.
controlled sharing:some rights reserved
might be the right choice for more of the people more of the time. This requires lawyers to write and interpret licenses.
63
64
65
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<Work rdf:about="">
<dc:type rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text" />
<license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/" />
</Work>
<License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/">
<permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Reproduction" />
<permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Distribution" />
<requires rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Notice" />
<requires rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Attribution" />
<prohibits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/CommercialUse" />
<permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/DerivativeWorks" />
<requires rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/ShareAlike" />
</License>
</rdf:RDF>
66
67
Answer three simple questions to choose a license.
68
Then, you’ll get a logo to put on your web page.
69
The logo links to the Commons Deed.
70
The Commons Deed links to the Legal Code.
71
• As of August 2005– About 53,000,000
web pages link to a CC license, according to Yahoo
Copyright Public Domain
Creative Commons
72
73
Metadata-aware search engine:
the Web
Search for works you can share and re-use
74
Mozilla Search Box
75
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Find me IMAGES of SUNSETS that I can MODIFY:
76
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Find me IMAGES of SUNSETS that I can modify:
Photo By: Marco Cortesi
77
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Reads the code out of the web page:
78
79
80
81
82
83
Over 4.7 million CC-licensed
photos on Flickr (Sept. 2005)
84
Mixter
85
Internet Archive
Free Hosting for CC works
86
ccPublisher.
87
Choose a license.
88
Upload your file.
89
Get a download URL.
90
Your work is online at the Internet Archive.
91Wired Magazine, Nov. 2004
92
93
94
95
96
97
Summary
• Universities have core institutional reasons to support the information commons
• Universities can establish institutional mechanisms that support the information commons.
• Everyone can support the commons by using Creative Commons licenses
98
END