- Preliminary results from temperature modeling using the CIII 97.7 nm / CIV 155 nm line ratio give...

1
- Preliminary results from temperature modeling using the CIII 97.7 nm / CIV 155 nm line ratio give an average plasma temperature of 25 eV early in counter-helicity shots (at right), increasing to 35 eV during magnetic reconnection (the counter-helicity configuration maximizes the amount of energy released during reconnection). - Temperatures for single-spheromak shots (during which no reconnection took place) were approximately constant at 25 eV (not shown). - Further work will attempt to reduce the uncertainty in average temperature profiles caused by shot-to-shot variations in plasma structure. High Time Resolution Measurements of Electron Temperature in a Laboratory Plasma Vernon Chaplin 1 , David Cohen 1 , Michael Brown 1 , and Chris Cothran 1,2 1. Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA 19081 2. Haverford College, Haverford, PA 19041 Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Department of Energy and the Research Corporation through grants to Swarthmore College, and by the Provost’s office at Swarthmore College via a Tarble Summer Research Fellowship. Introduction - The Swarthmore Spheromak Experiment (SSX) studies magnetic reconnection during the merging of two spheromaks: Figure 1. Schematic of spheromak formation in SSX. (a) Hydrogen gas is pumped into the space between the inner and outer electrodes, while current through the outer coils creates a “stuffing field.” (b) The main capacitor banks discharge, ionizing the gas as a radial current flows from the outer to the inner electrode. (c) The J × B force between the gun field and the plasma current accelerates the spheromak out of the gun. (d) The plasma drags along the stuffing field, which reconnects to form the poloidal field of the spheromak. [Figure taken from J.Fung, Swarthmore College Honors Thesis, 2006] - During magnetic reconnection, high magnetic field gradients cause field lines to change their topology and reconnect, converting stored magnetic energy into kinetic energy in bulk plasma flows or heating. This process provides a likely explanation for the extremely high temperatures observed in the solar corona, and has relevance in other astrophysical settings. Figure 2. Magnetic reconnection. In a perfectly conducting plasma, magnetic field lines are “frozen-in” and move with the plasma. However, real plasmas have finite resistivity, so it is possible for field lines to diffuse through the plasma and reconnect. [Figure from Fung, 2006] Experimental Methods - Probes inserted into the plasma can measure magnetic fields and provide information about bulk flows, but they also create significant perturbations in the plasma structure. External, photon-based diagnostics are therefore also useful for determining plasma properties. - The SSX plasma is composed primarily of hydrogen. However, impurity ions from elements such as carbon and oxygen are also present in non- negligible quantities. Observations of emission from these ions provide a means for calculating plasma properties such as temperature and composition. - Measurements were made using two complementary diagnostics: - Strengths of individual impurity emission lines were measured using a vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) monochromator. - In coronal equilibrium (validation discussed at top of next column) ionization balances and atomic level populations depend only on the plasma electron temperature (T e ), so observed line strength ratios can be used as a temperature diagnostic. Figure 4. The SSX VUV monochromator. - Broad spectral features were captured with the aid of a low resolution soft x-ray detector (SXR) composed of photodiodes filtered by thin films of Al, Ti, Sn, and Zr. - Each SXR filter had a different response function, so the large-scale spectral dependence on T e means that measured filter ratios can provide another temperature diagnostic. - High (0.01 μs) time resolution allows temperatures to be calculated at 1 μs 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 -0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 R e sp on sivity (A /W ) E n erg y (eV ) U n filtere d Al Sn Ti Zr Figure 5. SXR filter response functions. The black line represents the responsivity of the unfiltered photodiodes. Collisional-Radiative Modeling Figure 7. Time evolution of CIII, CIV, and CV fractions in simulations with T = 15 eV, nominal SSX density (8 x 10 15 ions/cm 3 in the gun, decreasing linearly to 5 x 10 14 ions/cm 3 at 30 μs), and starting atomic level populations calculated based on LTE at three different starting temperatures. The three simulations become nearly identical within 10 μs. The short time needed to reach equilibrium demonstrates that steady-state simulations are sufficient to achieve accurate results at SSX densities, and that the initial plasma conditions don’t significantly affect the measurements we make at later times. - Extracting meaningful results from VUV monochromator and SXR data requires significant computational analysis. - The non-LTE excitation kinematics code PrismSPECT was used to produce model spectra over a range of plasma conditions. - Time-dependent simulations show that the plasma approaches a steady state ~10 s after leaving the plasma gun (and well before reconnection, which occurs at about 40 s). 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1E 11 1E 12 1E 13 1E 14 1E 15 1E 16 1E 17 1E 18 1E 19 E m issivity (e rg /cm 3/ster/s/e V ) P hoton E n ergy (e V ) Figure 6. Spectrum produced for model with T = 44 eV and 0.1 % C, N, and O impurities present - VUV measurements of carbon emission line ratios averaged over many SSX shots were compared to results from steady-state simulations to calculate typical temperature profiles - Model emission in each energy bin was multiplied by the SXR filter responsivities to determine simulated filter ratios. Results of a series of models were then compared to SXR measurements to determine a best-fit temperature profile for each shot Results from the VUV Monochromator Results from the Soft X-Ray Detector Figure 12. Example of SXR temperature fitting for a single time step during an SSX shot. Lines represent model-predicted filter ratios while lone points represent experimental data. Ratios involving the Sn filter have been omitted. Figure 13. Best-fit temperature profile for a counter-helicity shot calculated from SXR data. - SXR temperature fitting was hindered by anomalously strong signals from the tin-filtered diode in nearly all experimental runs. - Typical tin (Sn) signals were nearly twice as strong as Al signals and 5+ times stronger than Ti and Zr signals, a result that is hard to reconcile with Figure 5 for any reasonable spectrum. - One solution to the mystery could be that the Sn filter passed significant photons at UV or visible wavelengths (E < 10 eV) - A “lollipop-like” device was built to test this hypothesis. - Measurements from a series of shots with the “lollipop” in place showed that less than 2% of the Sn filter signal was produced by UV or visible photons, thereby ruling out a UV leak as a significant cause of the anomalous results. Figure 11. SXR lollipop device, featuring windows made of UV-fused silica (transmission cuts off abruptly above 7.3 eV), and sapphire (transmission cuts off above 8.3 eV). After the device was inserted into SSX, the windows were oriented at 90 degrees with respect to one another. Rotating the device then allowed us to position either window in the SXR line of sight. - Current results from SXR modeling with the Sn filter data omitted (see Figure 12) suggests an average electron temperature of ~40 eV during counter-helicity spheromak merging. - This value is within the uncertainty range for the average T e calculated from VUV line ratios. - However, the expected spike in T e during reconnection is not seen (Figure 13). - It remains unclear whether we will be able to use SXR to derive reliable temperature estimates. - Ongoing research is investigating the possibly that anomalous filter signals could be caused by non-Maxwellian electron velocity distributions. Figure 3. Lines of sight for VUV monochromator (red) and soft x-ray detector (blue) in SSX. [Figure from A. Falk, Swarthmore College Honors Thesis, 2003] Spheromaks formed in guns - Impurity ion emission lines measured with VUV monochromator: - CIII 97.7 nm 1s 2 2s 1 2p 1 1 P 1 → 1s 2 2s 2 1 S 0 - CIV 155 nm 1s 2 2p 1 2 P 1/2 and 1s 2 2p 1 2 P 3/2 → 1s 2 2s 1 2 S 1/2 - CIII 229.7 nm 1s 2 2p 2 1 D 2 → 1s 2 2s 1 2p 1 1 P 1 - OV 63.0 nm 1s 2 2s 1 2p 1 1 P 1 → 1s 2 2s 2 1 S 0 - NV 124 nm 1s 2 2p 1 2 P 1/2 and 1s 2 2p 1 2 P 3/2 → 1s 2 2s 1 2 S 1/2 - Lines we failed to detect: - CV 227.4 nm, OIV 55.4 nm, OIV 79 nm, OVI 103.5 nm, NIV 76.5 nm Figure 10. Electron temperature profile derived from the CIII 97.7 nm / CIV 155 nm line ratio averaged over 25 counter- helicity shots for each line. Dotted lines show the uncertainty range. The inset shows a sample VUV monochromator data trace (smoothed over 1 µs intervals). 0 20 40 60 80 100 1E -4 1E -3 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 S im ulated 9 7.7 n m /155 nm line inte nsity ratio 97 nm /155 nm lin e stre n g th T (eV ) - Comparison of experimental results with simulations suggests that carbon is by far the dominant impurity in SSX, with smaller concentrations of oxygen and possibly nitrogen present. - Further work is needed to place numerical constraints on impurity concentrations. - The CIII 229.7 line was observed to be anomalously strong in experiments compared to its intensity in simulations at all plausible temperatures. - The CIII 97.7 nm / CIV 155 nm line ratio proved to be extremely useful for calculating plasma electron temperatures. Figure 8. Temperature dependence of the CIII 97.7 nm / CIV 155 nm line intensity ratio calculated using steady-state PrismSPECT simulations. 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 10000 100000 1000000 1E 7 1E 8 1E 9 1E10 1E11 1E12 1E13 In te n sity (e rg /cm 2 /ste r/s/e V ) W a vele ng th (A n gstro m s) T = 10 eV 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 10000 100000 1000000 1E 7 1E 8 1E 9 1E10 T = 30 eV In te n sity (e rg /cm 2 /ste r/s/e V ) W a ve le n g th (A ngstrom s) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 10000 100000 1000000 1E 7 1E 8 1E 9 1E10 1E11 T = 20 eV In te n sity (e rg /cm 2 /ste r/s/e V ) W avele ngth (A n gstro m s) Figure 9. Sample PrismSPECT spectra for a 40 cm thick hydrogen plasma with 1% carbon impurity and T e = 10 eV, 20 eV, and 30 eV (left to right). The CIV 155 nm and CIII 97.7 nm lines are the two strongest in all three simulations, but the relative strength of the 155 nm line increases as the plasma gets hotter and the carbon ionization balance shifts away from CIII and towards CIV. A copy of this poster can be found at http://astro.swarthmore.edu/~vchapli1/Files/Posters_and_Publ - In the SSX we study reconnection dynamics in several different merging configurations, focusing on the dynamics in the reconnection layer and how the annihilation of magnetic flux leads to flow, non-thermal particles, heating, and ultimately radiation. The spectral diagnostics discussed here are complemented by magnetic probe measurements, interferometric density diagnostics, and measurements from high-energy particle detectors.

Transcript of - Preliminary results from temperature modeling using the CIII 97.7 nm / CIV 155 nm line ratio give...

Page 1: - Preliminary results from temperature modeling using the CIII 97.7 nm / CIV 155 nm line ratio give an average plasma temperature of 25 eV early in counter-helicity.

- Preliminary results from temperature modeling using the CIII 97.7 nm / CIV 155 nm line ratio give an average plasma temperature of 25 eV early in counter-helicity shots (at right), increasing to 35 eV during magnetic reconnection (the counter-helicity configuration maximizes the amount of energy released during reconnection).

- Temperatures for single-spheromak shots (during which no reconnection took place) were approximately constant at 25 eV (not shown).

- Further work will attempt to reduce the uncertainty in average temperature profiles caused by shot-to-shot variations in plasma structure.

High Time Resolution Measurements of Electron Temperature in a Laboratory PlasmaVernon Chaplin1, David Cohen1, Michael Brown1, and Chris Cothran1,2

1. Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA 19081 2. Haverford College, Haverford, PA 19041

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Department of Energy and the Research Corporation through grants to Swarthmore College, and by the Provost’s office at Swarthmore College via a Tarble Summer Research Fellowship.

Introduction- The Swarthmore Spheromak Experiment (SSX) studies magnetic reconnection during the merging of two spheromaks:

Figure 1. Schematic of spheromak formation in SSX. (a) Hydrogen gas is pumped into the space between the inner and outer electrodes, while current through the outer coils creates a “stuffing field.” (b) The main capacitor banks discharge, ionizing the gas as a radial current flows from the outer to the inner electrode. (c) The J × B force between the gun field and the plasma current accelerates the spheromak out of the gun. (d) The plasma drags along the stuffing field, which reconnects to form the poloidal field of the spheromak. [Figure taken from J.Fung, Swarthmore College Honors Thesis, 2006]

- During magnetic reconnection, high magnetic field gradients cause field lines to change their topology and reconnect, converting stored magnetic energy into kinetic energy in bulk plasma flows or heating. This process provides a likely explanation for the extremely high temperatures observed in the solar corona, and has relevance in other astrophysical settings.

Figure 2. Magnetic reconnection. In a perfectly conducting plasma, magnetic field lines are “frozen-in” and move with the plasma. However, real plasmas have finite resistivity, so it is possible for field lines to diffuse through the plasma and reconnect. [Figure from Fung, 2006]

Experimental Methods- Probes inserted into the plasma can measure magnetic fields and provide information about bulk flows, but they also create significant perturbations in the plasma structure. External, photon-based diagnostics are therefore also useful for determining plasma properties.

- The SSX plasma is composed primarily of hydrogen. However, impurity ions from elements such as carbon and oxygen are also present in non-negligible quantities. Observations of emission from these ions provide a means for calculating plasma properties such as temperature and composition.

- Measurements were made using two complementary diagnostics:

- Strengths of individual impurity emission lines were measured using a vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) monochromator.

- In coronal equilibrium (validation discussed at top of next column) ionization balances and atomic level populations depend only on the plasma electron temperature (Te), so observed line strength ratios can be used as a temperature diagnostic.

Figure 4. The SSX VUV monochromator.

- Broad spectral features were captured with the aid of a low resolution soft x-ray detector (SXR) composed of photodiodes filtered by thin films of Al, Ti, Sn, and Zr.

- Each SXR filter had a different response function, so the large-scale spectral dependence on Te means that measured filter ratios can provide another temperature diagnostic.

- High (0.01 μs) time resolution allows temperatures to be calculated at 1 μs intervals.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160-0.02

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

0.22

0.24

0.26

Re

spo

nsi

vity

(A

/ W

)

Energy (eV)

Unfiltered Al Sn Ti Zr

Figure 5. SXR filter response functions. The black line represents the responsivity of the unfiltered photodiodes.

Collisional-Radiative Modeling

Figure 7. Time evolution of CIII, CIV, and CV fractions in simulations with T = 15 eV, nominal SSX density (8 x 1015 ions/cm3 in the gun, decreasing linearly to 5 x 1014 ions/cm3 at 30 μs), and starting atomic level populations calculated based on LTE at three different starting temperatures. The three simulations become nearly identical within 10 μs. The short time needed to reach equilibrium demonstrates that steady-state simulations are sufficient to achieve accurate results at SSX densities, and that the initial plasma conditions don’t significantly affect the measurements we make at later times.

- Extracting meaningful results from VUV monochromator and SXR data requires significant computational analysis.

- The non-LTE excitation kinematics code PrismSPECT was used to produce model spectra over a range of plasma conditions.

- Time-dependent simulations show that the plasma approaches a steady state ~10 s after leaving the plasma gun (and well before reconnection, which occurs at about 40 s).

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1601E11

1E12

1E13

1E14

1E15

1E16

1E17

1E18

1E19

Em

issi

vity

(e

rg/c

m3

/ste

r/s/

eV

)

Photon Energy (eV)

Figure 6. Spectrum produced for model with T = 44 eV and 0.1 % C, N, and O impurities present

- VUV measurements of carbon emission line ratios averaged over many SSX shots were compared to results from steady-state simulations to calculate typical temperature profiles

- Model emission in each energy bin was multiplied by the SXR filter responsivities to determine simulated filter ratios. Results of a series of models were then compared to SXR measurements to determine a best-fit temperature profile for each shot

Results from the VUV Monochromator

Results from the Soft X-Ray Detector

Figure 12. Example of SXR temperature fitting for a single time step during an SSX shot. Lines represent model-predicted filter ratios while lone points represent experimental data. Ratios involving the Sn filter have been omitted.

Figure 13. Best-fit temperature profile for a counter-helicity shot calculated from SXR data.

- SXR temperature fitting was hindered by anomalously strong signals from the tin-filtered diode in nearly all experimental runs.

- Typical tin (Sn) signals were nearly twice as strong as Al signals and 5+ times stronger than Ti and Zr signals, a result that is hard to reconcile with Figure 5 for any reasonable spectrum.

- One solution to the mystery could be that the Sn filter passed significant photons at UV or visible wavelengths (E < 10 eV)

- A “lollipop-like” device was built to test this hypothesis.

- Measurements from a series of shots with the “lollipop” in place showed that less than 2% of the Sn filter signal was produced by UV or visible photons, thereby ruling out a UV leak as a significant cause of the anomalous results.

Figure 11. SXR lollipop device, featuring windows made of UV-fused silica (transmission cuts off abruptly above 7.3 eV), and sapphire (transmission cuts off above 8.3 eV). After the device was inserted into SSX, the windows were oriented at 90 degrees with respect to one another. Rotating the device then allowed us to position either window in the SXR line of sight.

- Current results from SXR modeling with the Sn filter data omitted (see Figure 12) suggests an average electron temperature of ~40 eV during counter-helicity spheromak merging.

- This value is within the uncertainty range for the average Te calculated from VUV line ratios.

- However, the expected spike in Te during reconnection is not seen (Figure 13).

- It remains unclear whether we will be able to use SXR to derive reliable temperature estimates.

- Ongoing research is investigating the possibly that anomalous filter signals could be caused by non-Maxwellian electron velocity distributions.

Figure 3. Lines of sight for VUV monochromator (red) and soft x-ray detector (blue) in SSX. [Figure from A. Falk, Swarthmore College Honors Thesis, 2003]

Spheromaks formed in guns

- Impurity ion emission lines measured with VUV monochromator:

- CIII 97.7 nm 1s22s12p1 1P1 → 1s22s2 1S0

- CIV 155 nm 1s22p1 2P1/2 and 1s22p1 2P3/2 → 1s22s1 2S1/2

- CIII 229.7 nm 1s22p2 1D2 → 1s22s12p1 1P1

- OV 63.0 nm 1s22s12p1 1P1 → 1s22s2 1S0

- NV 124 nm 1s22p1 2P1/2 and 1s22p1 2P3/2 → 1s22s1 2S1/2

- Lines we failed to detect:

- CV 227.4 nm, OIV 55.4 nm, OIV 79 nm, OVI 103.5 nm, NIV 76.5 nm

Figure 10. Electron temperature profile derived from the CIII 97.7 nm / CIV 155 nm line ratio averaged over 25 counter-helicity shots for each line. Dotted lines show the uncertainty range. The inset shows a sample VUV monochromator data trace (smoothed over 1 µs intervals).

0 20 40 60 80 1001E-4

1E-3

0.01

0.1

1

10

100Simulated 97.7 nm / 155 nm line intensity ratio

97 n

m /

155

nm

line s

treng

th

T (eV)

- Comparison of experimental results with simulations suggests that carbon is by far the dominant impurity in SSX, with smaller concentrations of oxygen and possibly nitrogen present.

- Further work is needed to place numerical constraints on impurity concentrations.

- The CIII 229.7 line was observed to be anomalously strong in experiments compared to its intensity in simulations at all plausible temperatures.

- The CIII 97.7 nm / CIV 155 nm line ratio proved to be extremely useful for calculating plasma electron temperatures.

Figure 8. Temperature dependence of the CIII 97.7 nm / CIV 155 nm line intensity ratio calculated using steady-state PrismSPECT simulations.

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 350010000

100000

1000000

1E7

1E8

1E9

1E10

1E11

1E12

1E13

Inte

nsity

(er

g/cm

2/st

er/s

/eV

)

Wavelength (Angstroms)

T = 10 eV

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 350010000

100000

1000000

1E7

1E8

1E9

1E10

T = 30 eV

Inte

nsity

(er

g/cm

2/st

er/s

/eV

)

Wavelength (Angstroms)

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 350010000

100000

1000000

1E7

1E8

1E9

1E10

1E11

T = 20 eV

Inte

nsity

(er

g/cm

2/st

er/s

/eV

)

Wavelength (Angstroms)

Figure 9. Sample PrismSPECT spectra for a 40 cm thick hydrogen plasma with 1% carbon impurity and Te = 10 eV, 20 eV, and 30 eV (left to right). The CIV 155 nm and CIII 97.7 nm lines are the two strongest in all three simulations, but the relative strength of the 155 nm line increases as the plasma gets hotter and the carbon ionization balance shifts away from CIII and towards CIV.

A copy of this poster can be found at http://astro.swarthmore.edu/~vchapli1/Files/Posters_and_Publications

- In the SSX we study reconnection dynamics in several different merging configurations, focusing on the dynamics in the reconnection layer and how the annihilation of magnetic flux leads to flow, non-thermal particles, heating, and ultimately radiation. The spectral diagnostics discussed here are complemented by magnetic probe measurements, interferometric density diagnostics, and measurements from high-energy particle detectors.