...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of...

65
DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior, Pap?.. arc prelirni~lary rrateri-lr; clrcuinteJ lo stimulate discussior~ an(', critic21 cni- men^. Kcfel-PI rc.s in yuhlica t ir\n to Discussion !'npcrs s!:ould bc cleared wii 1, t:;[-. autllar(s) to protect .. . the tcl~tative character of t!it:se paper:,. ~i-c rs;~>rs rxpr-c3ss tl~e viczws of the alltilor a.:d slic:~ld not bc incerl~rctci! to I ~flcct ri~osc of the. World Bank. Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

Transcript of ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of...

Page 1: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

DRDI 8

Development Research Center

Discuss icn P a p e r s

No. 18

The A l l o c a t i v e Consequences of Economics of Sca le

Larry E . Westphal and Yung W . Rhee

January 19 7.6 L

KOTE: Discussior, Pap?.. a r c p re l i rn i~ la ry r r a t e r i - l r ; c l r c u i n t e J l o s t i m u l a t e d i s c u s s i o r ~ an(', c r i t i c 2 1 cni- men^. Kcfel-PI rc.s i n yuhl ica t i r \n t o Discuss ion ! 'npcrs s!:ould b c c l ea red w i i 1 , t:;[-. a u t l l a r ( s ) t o p r o t e c t .. . the t c l ~ t a t i v e c h a r a c t e r of t!it:se paper:,. ~ i - c rs ;~>rs rxpr-c3ss t l ~ e viczws of the alltilor a.:d slic:~ld not bc i n c e r l ~ r c t c i ! to I ~ f l c c t r i ~ o s c of the. World B a n k .

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Page 2: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

I n t he c o n t e x t of a l l o c a t i n g i n v e s t n e n t r e soLrce s anong projects, t h i s pa?er a d d r e s s e s t h e q u e s t i o n " ~ o e s i n t e rde7endence due rc e:cnoniss of s c a l e ' m a t t e r ' ? " A s t a t i c , z i x e d i n t e g e r prograrrxing :ode1 o f t h e mcchani:al eng inec r i xg s e c t o r i s used. Th i s model was o r i g i n a l l y cons t ruc r ed a s a d e v i c s t o o h t a i a en i n i t i a l comparative advanEage r ank ing of p roduc t i on a c t i v i t i e s p r i o r t3 t h e desi-gn 05 spc- c i f i c p r o j e c t s i n t h e Republ ic of Korea. Here i t is employed, f i rs : , t o n e a s u r e n m e r i c a l l y t h e d e g r e e of i ~ c r e a s i n g r e t u r n s and t h e n a t u r e of i n t e rdependence w i t h i n t h e s e c t o r and, second , t o e s t h t e t h e c o s t of n e g l e c t i n g i n t e rdependence when p l a n n i n g r e s o u r c e a l l o c a t i o n . Tne pape r conc ludes t h a t t h e a l l o c a t i v e con- sequences o f econonies o f s c a l e are f a r l e s s s i g n i f i c a n t t h a n h a s p robab ly been supposed, b u t t h a t t h e y a r e n o n e t h e l e s s g r e a t enough t o w a r r a n t t h e :fie of progran- n i n g methods r a t h e r t h a n c o n v e n t i o n a l b e n e f i t - c o s t p r o j e c t a p p r a i s a l t e c h n i q u e s .

It I s w i d e l y r ecogn i zed t h a c conven t i ona l b e n e f i t - c o s t p r o j e c t q p p r a i s a l

t e chn iques % f a i l t o y i e l d a n e f f i c i e n t a l l o c a t i o n of r e s o u r c e s when a p p l i e d .* .

t o p r a j e c t s c h a r a c t e r i z e d by economies of s c a 1 e . l ' m e t h e r i n f a c t economies of

s c a l e do have such a l l o c a t i v e consequences i s a n m p i r i c a l i s s u e t h a t depends

upon t h e c h a r a c t e r o f t h e i n t e r d e p e n d e n c i e s anong p r o d u c t i o r ~ activities w i t h i n a

p a r t i c u l a r set of c i rcumstances .2 ' Th i s paper e m p i r i c a l l y e s t i m a t e s t h e a l l o c a t i v e

consequences o f e conon i e s of s c a l e u s i n g a n e x p e r i m e n t a l n o d e l developed i n cbn-

n e c t i o n w i t h p l a n n i n g t h e expans ion of t h e of Korea ' s mechanical e n g i n e e r i n g

s e c t o r . / I t i s o rgan i zed as fo l l ows : The model i s d e s c r i b e d i n t h e nex t s e c c i o n ,

a f t e r which pa r ame te r e s t i m a t e s f o r Korea a r e used t o i n v e s t i g a t e t h e d e g r e e o f

i n c r e a s i n g r e t u r n s and t h e c h a r a c t e r of i ~ ~ t e r d e p e n d e n c e w i t h i n t h e s e l c t o r . S o l u t i o n s

t o t h e model a r e used i n t h e t h i r d s e c t i o n t o estimate t h e c o s t of n e g l e c t i n g i n-

t e rdependence , and t h e c o n c l u s i o n c o n s i d e r s t h e r o b u s t n e s s o f t h e e s t i m a t e s o b t a i n e d . , I

L

* The a u t h o r s a r e r c s p e c f i v ~ i y a f f i l i a t e d w i t h t h e Dcvelopnent Economics De;arrxcnt - - and t h e Development Research Cente r of t h e T n t e r n a c i o n a l 5ank f o r R e c o n s t r u c t i o n 2nd

'1 Development, Washington, D C . The views exp re s sed i n t h i s paper a r e t h o s e of ' k c a u t h o r s and n o t n e c e s s a r i l y t h o s e of t h e Bank. 'ITr~is pape r waz presei l ted ai t h e - - Econometr ic S o c i e t y S e s s i o n t i t l e d " ~ o m ~ a r l s o n s of Econes ic S r u c t u r e , " 1 9 7 5 , ASSA

%! X e e t i n ~ s . . - L

1/ See, f o r exan.ple, Chenery (1955) . The s t a t e cf tltc: a r t i n p r o j e c t dpprnis:; t=.:!:~;<~~!?s - i s ap:ly d i s c u s s e d i-n t h e r - c e n t aanr:als by 1 - i r t i c . 2 . ~ ~ e ' . : i r r lces ( lCI65)nxd L";I._L' 11572:.

2 / See V~stphnl. ( 1 9 7 5 ) , p a r ~ ~ c i l l t r - i . y S e c t i c ~ . 5. T(\ c.<::tX there h-i-vc b ~ 0 1 , v e r y f c ~ ; - attemy,:s t c ~ e s s u z - e ea ; l i r i ca l iy chese con:;eque:x\ L,. Ti;,, p r c t r i o u s . > t ~ d i t - s a r c t h o s e by we,ctphal (1971) and ?ianue ( 1 9 7 3 ) .

3 1 -4 f ; ~ ? l r c 2 - r t or, :I:$.; -.,ode1 i s g iven i n Wcstp!?aI r.:?? "n.cc. (19;' I , x h i c ! ~ is ~ . . ~ . i i l - -- rlhle o - : r , . ? q ~ ~ c ~ s t .

Page 3: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

I. A Ycdel of t h e r.iechanica1 E n g i n e e r i n g S e c t o r

A tesm of economis t s and e n g i n e e r s des igned and irri3lemented t h e n c d e l , whic5

Tas o ~ i g i n a l l y i n t e n d e d as zn e x p e r i n e n t a l s c r e e n i n g d e v i c e t o o b t a i n an i n i t i a l

c c x p a r a t i v e

p r o j e c t s . A/ a d v a n t a g e rank ing of p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s p r i o r t o t h e d e s i g n of s p e c i f i c

The z q ~ d 1 a l s o s e r v e s as a compact d e s c r i p t i o n of t echno-ecmonic

r e l a t i o n s h i p s v i t h i n t h e n e c h a n i c a l e n g i n e e r i n g s e c t o r . Though sector-wid;e i n s c o p e ,

i t i s r a t h e r h i g h l y d i s a g g r e g a t e d , and i t s t e c h n i c a l c o e f f i c i e n t s a r e e n g i h e e r i n g

est imates.T' . te n o d e l is r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e "make-buy" c h o i c e between domest ic p r o d u c t i o n

and i n p o r t s ; however, i t s s t r u c t u r e cou ld e a s i l y b e ex tended t o 2nc lude chb ices among

a l t e r n a t i v e p r o d u c t i o n t e c h n i q u e s f o r i n d i v i d u a l p r o d u c t s . The node1 is s t a t i c and

does no t i n c o r p o r a t e l o c a t i o n a l d e t a i l s . Economies of s c a l e a r e s p e c i f i e d l t h r o u g h t h e

zodel ls f o r n u l a t i o n as a n i x e d i n t e g e r programming (XIP) problem. The o b j e i t i v e f u n c r i o n

i s t o n i n i n i z e t h e c o s t of s a t i s f y i n g a f i x e d b i l l of exogenous demands fo* v a r i o u s

mechan ica l e n g i n e e r i n g p r o d u c t s . The s u p p l y ( p r o d u c t i o n p l u s i n p o r t s ) of each p r o d u c t

must s u f f i c e t o meet t h e exogenous demand p l u s t h e i n t e r m e d i a t e demand t h a e i s due t o

p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t y w i t h i n t h e s e c t o r . Inpu t- ou tpu t i n t e r d e p e n d e n c i e s wi th , in t h e

s e c t o r aAde t h u s c a p t u r e d w i t h i n t h e n o d e l .

The f o c a l conce rn of t h e model is t h e i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e among p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v , t i e s

w i t h i n t h e s e c t o r ; t h i s i s i t s advan tage over t r a d i t i o n a l methods o f p r o j e c t e v a l u a t i o n .

S i g n i f i c a n t i n t e r d e p e n d e n c i e s among p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s stem from s t r p n g Fconoxies of . f

h

s c a l e i n p r o c e s s i n g a c t i v i t y and a r e t r a n s m i t t e d th rough t h e u s e of ccmnon b a r t s

(components and sub- assembl ies1 i n a l a r g e number of d i f f e r e n t end p r o d u c t s ' a n d t h e u s e i

.a of c o m o n p r o c e s s i n g f a c i l i t i e s by d i f f e r e n t p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s . Capac i ty s h a r i n g , - - o u r t e r n f o r t h e u s e of c o n r n o n ~ r o c e s s i n g f a c i l i t i e s , is an e x t r e c e l y impor tan t ?her.o:ner.cr, -

0

t h a c r c s u l t : ~ t ' ron tile inul t i -purpose r ~ n t r l r c o f procc:;sing f a c i l i t i e s w i t h i n $he s e c t o r .

clcpscLt. ; r , . : ~ r i n g can o c c u r d i r e c t l y , a s w h e n t w o o r :;:ore p r o d u c t s a r e produced i:: t;:e

s a c e p l a n t , o r i n d i r e c t l y , a s xhzn d i s s i n l l a r p a r t s used ix d i f f e r e n t end products a r e

I * - he e:. c e r s , from t h e Korean I n s t i t u t e of S c i e n c e and Technology, worked ilnder t h e - d i r e c t i o n of Jcon Xoo :;an. T h e i r l ~ o r k v a s f inanced by the I 3 R D :lid t h e i ' t l ited S t a t e s Agency f o r I n t e r n a t i o n a l Cevelopment '? Xission t o Korea.

I .

Page 4: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

d ive r s i t : : ;-ocg 3 i l 0 7 ~ w i t h i n s ~ i ~ ~ e n s?,c? c l a s s t h a n zczcg 2 l a n t s - 2 i t h l n t t e sect::,

- d i s a g g r e ~ ~ r i o r , t o c!-,is Ls- el s i - p l i f i s s ~ 5 e n o a e l ' s s t r T ~ c t h : r e 2s t is rhs

e s c i a a c i o n o f t e c h n i c a l c c e f f i c i c n t s .

S t r u c t u r e sf t h e 'lode1

- 7

~ l l e 2ode. l i s a t a r g e t y e a z z o d e l c o n t a i n i n g f o u r d i s t i n c t s e t s of a c c i v i r i e s .

T h e r e is a s i x g l e 2 r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t y (xi) and a s i n g l e i n p o r t a c t i v i t y ( y . ) f o r each 1

p r o 2 u c t , i n d e x e d by i. b p r c d u c t nay be e i t h e r a n end p r o d u c t , s u b - a s s e f u ~ l y , c r I

conpcnen:. F o r e a c h shcp c l a s s ?, t h e r e i s a c o n t i n u o u s a c t i v i t y ( c k ) w h i c h c c r r e s p o n i s

t o t h e t o t a i v o l u n e of precessing w i t h i n s h o p s of z h z t c l a s s and a n i n n e g e r v a l u e d

a c t i - ~ i t y ( :,-) which c o r r s s p o n d s t o t h e number of s h o p s o f t h a t c l a s s <e iEg o ~ e r a z e d . h

The c o s t f u n c t i o n a s s o c i a t e d x i t i e a c h shop i s a f i x e d c h a r g e c o s t functi,n. ?,ere i s

aa u ? p e r bound t o t h e s i z e of a s i n g l e shop w i t h i n e a c h c l a s s , t h u s n o ? e t h a n a s i n g l e

s l o p n a y b e o p e r a t e d w i t h i n a g i v e n shop c l a s s .

T h r e e d i s t i n c t s e t s of c o n s t r a i n t s appear i n t h e n o d e l .

! ! a t e r i a l E a l a n c e C o n s t r a i n t s : There is a n a t e r i a i b ~ l a n c e c o n s t r $ i r , t f o r sash

producc stating t h a t r1;c s u n o f p r o d u c t i u n p l u s i m p o r t s ~ u s t e q u a i t h e ;urn of i , e I

Gxopenous dezitina p l u i :he e n c o g e n o u s l : ~ g e n e r a t e d deaand f o r i t s u s e a s hn ~ n t e c . c d 1 z t c

Page 5: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

Di = exugenods demand f o r t h e i ' t h p r o d u c t , i n m e t r i c t o p s ; and,

I = t h e nunber of p r o d u c t s ( p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s ) appearir 'g i n t5e mode:.

P;ocessing Requirement C o n s t m i n t s : For each shop c l a s s , a c o n s t r a i n t r e q u i r e s

t h a t t h e t o t a l vo1.une of p r o c e s s i n g be e q u a l t o t h e p r o c e s s i n g requir ,einents g e n e r a t e d 1

by t h e p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s :

I

k = 1, ..., K ; where

ck = t h e volume of p r o c e s s i n g i n shops of c l a s s k , i n shop hougs;

B k i = t h e number of shop h o u r s of p r o c e s s i n g r e q u i r e d i n a shop $f c l a s s k p e r

I

metric t o n of p r o d u c t i o n of t h e i ' t h p r o d u c t ; and, I

K = t h e number of shop c l a s s e s a p p e a r i n g i n t h e model.

I n t e g e r i t y C o n s t r a i n t s : F i n a l l y , a n o t h e r se t of c o n s t r a i n t s r e q u i t e s t h a t a

s u f f i c i e n t nunber of s h c p s be o p e r a t e d v i t h i n e a c h shop c l a s s : I

A k = Uk(ck) , k - 1, ..., K; where

bk = t h e number of s h o p s of c l a s s k b e i n g o p e r a t e d ;

Uk(ck) = f u n c t i o n g i v i n g t h e s m a l l e s t i n t e g e r l a r g e r t h a n o r e q u a l ck/Ck, and ,

Ck = t h e maximum p r o c e s s i n g c a p a c i t y of a shop i n c l a s s k , i n shbp h o u r s .

a e c t i v e Func t ion : A s s o c i a t e d w i t h each a c t i v i t y is a c o e f f i c i e n t i n t h e a

I

o b j e c t i v e f u n c t i o n s t a t i n g t h e exogenously g i v e n c o s t of o p e r a t i n g t h a t a c t i v i t y . The I

I

o b j e c t k v e f u n c t i o n i s : - -

minimize F. &:, + V c + F G i xi + L !.Ii Yi, whhre K k k a k= 1 12 i= 1 i= 1 -

I

Fk = t h e f i x e d cha rge a s s o c i a t e d wi th o p e r a t i n g a shop of c l a s s k ;

Vk = t h e v a r i a b l e c h a r g e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h o p e r a t i n g a shop of c i a s s k;

G~ = t h e exogenous c o s t of p roduc ing a m e t r i c t o n of :he i ' t h p r q d u s t ; and

!J = :he zrorld market i x p o r t p r i c e (donesc ic c u r r e n c y equ iva ien t l ) ? e r r?ecri.- i

I

torr of p roduc t i.

Page 6: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

c 0 n s : r a i n t s . The ~ c s t s of p r o c e s s l z g i n shc?s a rc a l s o enc!cge-ccsl;; dst2r: ine)i znc

- - 3re c h a r g e d t h r o u g h :he p r o c e s s i n g req1~i rer .e r . t c c n s t r a i n t s . T:?ese c c s h s i n c l ~ d e s - , I

z a p i t 3 1 c o s t s a s -dell a s i n d i r e c t i a b o r and x a t e r i a l s c o s t s i n c v ~ r k e a d czits ( 2 . g . I I

r e p a i r a n d z ~ i n t e n a n c e f a c i l i t i e s , s t e a c g e n e r a t i n g f a c i l i t i e s , and t?e like). Ca; l t z l I

c o s t s a r e b a s e d on :he i nves t zaen t c o s t o f c o n s t r u c t i n g a s h o p and incl lude i n t e r e s t I

as w e l l a s a r e p l a c e ~ e n t c h a r g e c a l c u l a ~ e d u s i n g a c a ? i t a l r e c o v e r y f a l c t a r . Jt3e.r I

i n t e r x e d i a t e i n p u t s , f o r wh ich t h e r e a r e no ?reduction a c t i v i t i e s ix :lie :.ode:, a r e

I i 2 c l u d e d \*<th in t h e exogenous c o s t e l e m e n t G i - ~ i r e c t l a b o r c o s t s a r e a l s o i n c o r F o r a t e d

I i n t h e G i l s a s t h e r e o r e a s s u ~ e d t o b ~ s o n s t z n t r e t c r n s t o t h e u s e o t / a ~ O r a i r e c i l y .-

er .p?ogea i n p r o c e s s i n g . I

I m p l e n e n t a t i o n o f t h e Yodel I I , I I

S e v e r a l i s s u e s must b e c o n f ~ o n t e d i n i m p l e x e n t i n g t h e mode l . ~ i r s k , wh ich

r e c h a n i c a l engf n e e r i n g p r o d u c t s are t o have p r o d u c t i o n a s t i v i t i e ; i n the n o d e l , i . e .

a r e t o be endogenous? A s b r o a d 2 c o v e r a g e a s p o s s i b l e was d e s i r e d i n i h e Korean I

i m p l e m e n t a t i o n , f o r t h e n o d e l was conceive.! a s a neons t o i s o l a t e t ! losj p r o d u c t s i n .'.hizn - I

I

Korea would have t h e g r e a t e s t c o n p a r a t i - r e a d v a n t a q e by 1975, t h e t a r g e f y e a r . T h e r e I 1 .

.vas n o n e t h e l e s s e p r t - s z l e c ~ i o n of p r o d u c t s , f o r i t was d e s i r e d t o c c r . a s ~ t r o : e cr.

I

t h o s e f o r c h i c h t h e r e ..~cls the g r e a t e s t 1Lkelii1cod t h a t Korea cculc! ac':~Seve ?roduct io!: I

c o s t s c o m p e t i t i v e v i t h i m p o r t s . ~ h c i p r e - s e i c c t i o n was p e r f o n e c i . :i:; er:gjirjcers rind :;zs I I

based upon - ~ ~ a r i o u s r u l e s of ~ h u c b and 2 Xnowicdge o f t ' ~ s - t ' ; ~ e : ~ exist in^ c z ; ' ~ b i l l t i e c o i

. . w I

K o r e a ' s nec ! l an icn i e n g i - e e r i r . 3 ir.dus:r:;. .L'?]e iiit cf ~-..:&O~CZC~J.:~ i>ri..cjt:,j:s c c ; ~ : z i ; ~ s I I . . . 120 i te - :5 . T!le f i r a d ~ = : s a p p . : , r i n g cn :!)is :is: r a n g e frcri; s ~ < : i :i::':-:;;~ :1: 2.l;ZS Z??C

. . jolts nl:i, :;in?!t: f a n <;.plt:, ,:i;s ;.I.$ t o .nnai)i;.ic Len:.; ,.;.: '"1~~:j:~'Pi~fs. I:.: ';<is ~i5.5"Z.L:. . '

. - . 1 . . L , 3 c i.:.s c , ;>..c..! . <; :. :':;c :::L:<: t h a t o t l l r r K C : - i ~ a n i c a i e n g i n e e r i r . g prodcc - t s , n o t ,:;~yc:!rii;; C'i: ' - .

Page 7: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

d

C o n c l - p t n a l l y , e a c h of t h e i n d i v i d u a l " ? roduc t s " a p p e a r i n g i n t h e c o d e l r e p r e s e c t s

a whole c l a z s of p r o e ~ c t s . F o r e x a n ? l e , t h e p r o d u c t " f r a c t i o n a l horsepower e l 2 c t r i c

c o t o r " r e p r e s e n t s t h e c l a s s of e l e c t r i c n o t o r s o i l e s s t h a n one horsepower . T h i s b e i c g

t h e c a s e , t h e r e i s a s e r i o u s i s s u e r e g a r d i n g how t h e t e c h n i c a l c o e f f i c i e n ~ s d e s c r i b i a g -

t h e p r o d x c t i o n of f r a c t i o n a l horsepower e l e c t r i c m o t o r s s h o u l d b e o b t a i n e d . I n one

v i e w , d e r i v e d f rom t h e p r i n c i p l e s of a g g r e g a t i o n i n i n p u t- o u t p u t a n a l y s i s , t h e s e

c o e f f i c i e n t s s h o u l d be w e i g h t e d a v e r a g e s of t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s p e r t a i n i n g to , i n d i v i d u a l l y

s p e c i f i e d f r a c t i o n a l ho r sepower e l e c t r i c n o t o r s , t h e w e i g h t s b e i n g e q u a l t o ( a n t i c i p a t e d )

- - o u t p u t s h a r e s . I n a n o t h e r v i ew, most c l e a r l y a r r i c u l a t e d Ly V i e t o r i s z (UNF~0,/-1972/),

t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s s h o u l d p e r t a i n t o t h e s i n g l e , most " r e p r e s e n t a t i v e " of t h e i n d i v i d u a l i y

s p e c i f i e d f r a c t i o n a l ho r sepower e l e c t r i c n o t o r s . For a nunber of r e a s o n s , l i n c l u d i n g

t h e e n g i n e e r i n g t r a d i t i o n of employing t h e " r e p r e s e n t a t i v e p r o d u c t" c o n c e p t , t h e

e n g i n e e r s working on t h e m o d e l ' s i a p l e n e n t a t i o n p r e f e r r e d t o have a s i n g l e u n i q u e l y

s p e c i f i e d p r o d u c t s e r v e a s t h e " r e p r e s e n t a t i v e" o f e a c h p r o d u c t c l a s s .

For t h e n o s t p a r t , w e c h o s e as r e p r e s e n t a t i v e t h o s e p r o d u c t s t h a t would have ':he

I

l a r g e s t s h a r e s e i t h e r of t h e a n t i c i p a t e d a b s o l u t e o u t p u t o r t h e a n t i c i p a t e d , growth of

c s t p u t v i t h i n t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e p r o d u c t c l a s s e s . The b o u n d a r i e s demarca t ing ! i n d i v i d u a l

p r o d u c t c l a s s e s were drawn on t h e b a s i s of s i m i l a r i t i e s among i n d i v i d u a l p r o d u c t s w i r h

r e s p e c t t o i n t e m e d i a t e i n p u t and p r o c e s s i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s . Thus t h e r e p r e s k n t $ I t i v e . I

p r o d u c t s a r e i n t e n d e d t o b e " r e p r e s e n t a t i v e " of t h e i n t e m e d i a t e i n p u t and p r o c e s s i n g

r e q u i r e m e n t s of a l l t h e i n d i v i d u a l p r o d u c t s f a l l i n g w i t n i n each p r o d u c t c l n g s . The - - d e g r e e t o which tI$zy a r e t r u l y r e p r e s e n t a t i v e i s of c o u r s e dependen t upon Ildw na r rowly

t h e b o l ~ n d a r i c s begdcen p r o d u c t c l a s s e s a r e drawn. 8 e . I

One l o o s e end remains t o b e t i d i e d up, and t h a t i s i n r e g a r d t o t h e ccnversion

of indi:ridual, n o n- r e p r e s e n t a t i v e p r o d u c t s i n c l u d e d w i t h i n a p a r t i c u l a r prcduc: ciass

FnEo u n i t s of t h e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e p r o d u c t . T h i s c o n v e r s i o n i s r e q u i r e d i n o r d e r to c:;iz

tb.e d c ~ a n d f o r t h e p r o d u c t c l a s s i n u n i t s of r h e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e ~ r o d u c : . The 2 c c z n d

Page 8: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

I , -

su;ply and denand i s p'n;isical xe ighc ( i 2 : 3 e r r t c c a n s ) . 3; I s q~rr.p-:.- the ? s f az?c - I I - - - -

v o l u n e :n ~ s t r i c t o n s of t h e exogencus ?urc:?ases o r a,: of c:?e i n d i v i $ u a ; z ~ ' Z ; i : t s I

f a l l i n g y i i t h i n t h e p a r t i c u l a r ? r o d u c t c i a s s . I

The s e c c n d n a j o r i s s u e 2190 c o n c e z p s a n a g g r e g a t i o n p r o ' c l m , t h i S Z ize ;llt'n I

r e c p s c r t o t t i e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of shop c l a s s e s . i n o u r i z p ? e ~ . e n t a t i c n i two r,r::ents I

d e s c r i b e a snop c l a s s : (1) t h e t y p e o f p r o c e s s i c e a c r i v i c y ; and , ( 7 ) +he c o l l e c t i z n I I

of p r o d u c t s c h a t c a n be p r o c e s s e d together t r i t h i n a s i s g l e shop . To '$orrow z n a n a l c g y I

P r o r b i o l o s y , t h e f o r n e r i d e n t i f i e s t h e g e n u s and t h e l a t t e r :he s p e c i e s . !.!e r a v e

distinguished anong 37 shop t:J?es, o r g e n e r a , a c c o r d i n g t o t h e k i n d 08 p r c c e s s L n ~ I

a c ; l v i r y c o n d u c t s d ( f o r g i n g , c a s t i n g , x a c n i n i n g , f a b r i c a t i o n , e t c . ) , <he ~ a j o r

p i e c e s cf equ ipmen t i n c l u d e d v i t h i n t h e s h o p , t h e maxinun w e i g h t of thle p a r t s -.:LC

can b e worked , t h e rnaxinunz f o r c e d e v e l o p e d by p r i x e equipment i n - t h e sihop, and s o c n . I

A l l s h o p s b e i o n g i n g t o t h e s a x e genus a r e assurried t o nave i d 2 n t i c a l fii:<ed c h a r g e I

c o s t f u n c t i o n s , which s o n s i d e r a b L y reduce ; t h e s z o u n t o f p a r a m e t e r e s t i h a t i o n

I . . r e q ~ i r c d t o 1rr.plemenr t h e model . W i t h i n a p a r t i c u l a r qeni l s , t h e r e e d i s : i n rc>.:;:-J l

a ~ i d e ; ~ z r i e t y of p a r t i c u l a r i z e d s h o p s , t h e d c s i g x o i each d e p e n d i c g ubcn :he L

. t I

I . . p a r t i c u i a r p r o d u c t x i - : b e i n g p roduced . !;e g i v e s x a r e s s j oi; t o thiy f a 2 k >y ais:ir?;;u:s!iing

I I

among s p e c i e s on t h e basis of the p r o d \ i z t s t h a t c c n b e ?roccs.cec! 1:eget;ler ~ L i ! ? i r , a - 3 I

s i n g l e s h o p . T h e d e s i g n a z i o n cf i n d i v i d d a l shop c : a s s - ~ v i t i i i n n g e n c k ;~:;:-es a * * I

r e a s c n a b i e l i z i t o n t h e e:<cer.r tc .~ilic:h #e i20de l car: ~ : . . p i o i .:2pL:ci:y i s ! ~ r % r z ct: m I . .

? - - . l o ~ . e r at:crage prudi!:: t i o n cos;; . In a l l , the >(oren 3 ~ 2 2 2 .I<. s i - i n ~ i i.r,ilcs L - c . 2 ~ .t..:> ::::I I -

- '. - , ,.: ,< . - . - - . . . .lc ne:<': ;?;;jar j 5.535 : ~ T . c ~ T : : s : : ! .e i r e a : - z c r ? l . - . - . ~ -.,. ,. : :!,,I: :?,; .L:--- c,. :. I:;:, :.:-.L

Page 9: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- 8 -

t h e f o l l o w i n g : I n r i i v i d u a l p i e c e s of e q u i p n e n t w i t h i n a shop a r e i n d i v i s i b l e . The re - is a l s o e v i d e n c e t h a t a s lx i l a r p i e c e of equipment of g r e a t e r c a p a c i t y c o s t s l e s s

p e r u n i t of c a p a c f t y t h a n d o e s one w i t h l ess c a p a c i t y . F i n a l l y , t h e r e a r e economies

of s c a l e w i t h r e s p e c t t o l o t s i z e because o f t h e f i x e d tine r e q u i r e d t o s e t - u p a

machine f o r a p a r t i c u l a r p r o d u c t i o n s e e p . Our i m p l e m e n t a t i o n i s focusLd on t h e I

i n d i v i s i b i l i t y of p r o c e s s i n g f a c i l i t i e s and a n economies o f s c a l e i n t h e i r c a 7 i t a l

c o s t s ; t h e s e would a p p e a r t o b e t h e i f i o ~ t s i g n i f i c a n t s o u r c e s o f d e c r e a b i n g a v e r a g e I

c o s t s i n t h e p r e s e n t Korean c o n t e x t . The p r o c e s s i n g i n p u t r e q u i r e m e n t c o e f f i c i + n t s

a p p e a r i n g i n t h e mod21 i n c l u d e t h e a v e r a g e ( w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e a n t i c i b a t e d s c a l e I

o f uu ;pu t ) t ine s p e n t on s e t t i n g- u p t h e equ ipmen t . I I I I

To e s t i m z t e t h e p r o c e s s i n g i n p u t r e q u i r e m e n t s and c o s t s , a " r e f e r i n c e shop" I

was d e s i g n e d f o r e a c h genus o f s h o p . c l a s s e s . E n a i n e e r i n g e s t i m a t e s o f t h e p r o c e s s i n g I I

i n p u t c o e f f i c i e n t s , Bki, were o b t a i n e d i n r e l a t i o n t o t h e s e r e f e r e n c e qhops. Shop 1 I

p r g c e s s i n g a c t i v i t y and c a p a c i t y v e r e i n i t i a l l y measured i n a a c h i n e ho(rs w i t h

r e s ? e c t t o t h e r e f e r e n c e s h o p . Thus t h e B c o e f f i c i e n t s i n i t i a l l y s t i t e d t h e t o t a l I

k i I I I

t i m e , summed o v e r t h e machines used w i t h i n t h e r e f e r e n c e s h o p , r e q u i r e d \ i n a c t u a i I

p r o c e s s i n g . &/ The machine t i n e c a p a c i t y of a p a r t i c u l a r shop e q u a l s t e numker of b mach ines i t c o n t a i n s m u l t i p l i e d by t h e number of h o u r s w i t h i n a y e a r t h b t t h e shop

I

may b e o p e r a t e d . I n t h e c a s e of shop g e n e r a i n which t h e c a p a c i t y of c i r c a i n p r i n e I

machines c o n r r o l s t h e p r o c e s s i n g f low, pr ime machine h o u r s s u b s t i t u t e f)r t o t a l I e

C I I

machine h o u r s as t h e measure of b o t h p r o c e s s i n g a c t i v i t y and c 9 p a c i t y . f o r c o n v e n i e n c e , I I

b o t h i n computa t ion and r e p o r t i n g s o l u t i o n r e s u l t s , machine t i r e was =or /ver ted t o

"shop t i n e " a f t e r t h e e s t i m a t e s were o b t a i n e d . T h i s c o n v e r s i o n s i m p 3 e q u i r e s C 1 - C I

d i v i d i n g p a r a m e t e r . measured i n a a c h i n e t i n e u n i t s by t h e number of - cq ines ( o r =a - I I I

p r i n e a a c h i n e s ) c o n t a i n e d i n t h e r e f e r e n c e shop . I I I

6 / Nr,'ce t h a t t h i s is n o t t h e s a c : h i n g 3 s t h e t o t s 1 " r c o l " t i n e a pa r t l i c i l l a r i:rx - spends w i t h i n a s h o p , which .*.culd i n c l u d e t h e "...iaitingU tLze d u r i n g ' : < h i ~ i ~ i t 1s b e i n g s t o r e d o r h e l d f o r f u r t h e r precessing. I

I I I I

I

I I I , !

Page 10: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

of ? i e c e s p r c d u c e d , t h e o ~ h e r i zpc r : an r 2e:eni:;zn:s ?i tkle t o c a l 2 r c k z s z i n - 6

I

r e c u i r e l e r . E s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h a p a r c i c - l a r i:en inc:ude the g e c g e t r i c coc f igu ra r i c . : l

o f t h e p i e c e t o be worked , t h e bi-,e;..siori and ; leigi l t of t h e ? i e c e t o be worked, ~ k s I

l e g r e e of ? r e c i s i o n r e q u i r e d , t h e l e n g t h cf t h e p r o d u c t i o n r u n , and t$e h a r d n e s s of I I - ,:,e - p i e c e t o b e v o r k e d . L/ However, n e a s u r e ~ e n t i n u n i t s o f t i m e i s Brckward wkeil i t I

cotes t o r r a s u r i n g c a p a c i t y , s i z c e any s h c p h a s t h e same c a p a c i t y i n isms of t h e I

t i z e i t nay be o p e r a t e d , r s g a r i i e s s of i c s s i r e i n t2L-35 of t h e n a a i r 4 n p o s s i b l e I I ~

v o l u ~ e of p r o d u c t i o n d u r i n g t h a t t i c e p e r i o d . I I

I

To o b c a i n e s t i n a t e s of t h e c o s t s of c o n s t r u c t i n g and o p e r a t i n g s q o p s of I I

d i f f e r e n t p h y s i c a l o u t ~ u t c a p a c i t i e s and f a l l i n g w i t h i n t h e s a o e % e c u g , t h e f o l l o u i n g I ~ I

p r o c e d u r e was employed. F i r s t , e s t i a a t s s o f t h e c o s t s of c o n s t r u c t i c $ and operating I l

e a c h r e f e r e n c e shop were o b t a i n e d . Then a shop w i t h i n each genus was d e s i g n e d t h a t - . I

had c ; i c e t h e 2 h y s i c a l o u t p u t c a p a c i t y cf t h e r e f e r e n c e s h o p , ; . hys i ca i o u t p u t c a p a c i t y I

b e i n s measu red i n soEe way t h a t was m e a n i n g f u l t o t h e e n g i n e e r s . :<e niay r e f e r to I

I

t h e s e s l ~ o p s a s t h e " d o u b l e - r e f e r e n c e - c z p a c i t y " s h o p s . C iven t h e e c c n o n ~ i e s of s c a l e I I

p r e v a l e n t i n t h e s e c t o r , t h e s e s h o p s do n o t mere ly r e p r e s e n t p r o ? o r t i o b a i b l o w - u ~ s

* o f t h e r e f e r e n c e ' s 2 o p s . Thus , i n d i v i d u a l p i e c e s of z a c h i n e r y f o u z d i n a g i v e n I

r e f e r e n c e shop n i g h t nc: e v e n be p r c s e n t ir, t h e a s s ~ 7 c i a t e d doub l c - r e f e ence-ca;>; lci : y k sllop. R e g a r d l e s s c f i t s ~ i t u a l x a c h i n e t ize capacit::, t i e s! lup tiae ;Gpa:i;y cf . i i ; i l

I

i - doubie- re lerence- l :ap:~ci ty sho; i s p r e c i s e l y twice I::s a s s c c i a c e d rc ferkr !cc shop's

8 I I

cap:acit:r. : ; ieasured iri shop tirne. Si:cp t i y e I S t ! :e refore a c : a " r e s l " t!::.~. : o ? i c p t I . . I

1 . a s e:n;;oyei in t ;?e ~ c ~ i e l ; i t is 1 r e l a t L - : ~ ,once?: -- <,:on c t r . 2 !:as se:r::..;z - o;,l-: -1:

rc1.q ?:i(~;l tc. tj:e ~ i : ~ p ~i:::f ,:3-; . i . . i a [ t::e c . . - ; s o ~ i a ; ~ . . .-;r: ;.reg:? si:::;!. .:,: : refer2r . : t .

- .. -.. .. , . ,,,,- ;:2?n:-:~: o f 2 , . : . ; , ; _ : LC!.?;; i;.:):rs :;; s;.zgAL ,-:!::: ::,. t ,> ;-ere ;?;cczed t o ';:;i..;e 3:i n - - , - I

o;.er:e:zI::. - - . ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ . f - r i j s:l:F ? f 1 , ,)(?;- 2..>4,2 ;lL,.,.: :::;,~:: Y . ~ : is ci 5fl:j;3 ; : ; : y ; : : . , :

I

- - . - - --. .- - - - I

I 7 , .- ( . -, v . . P .; i T.., , . , - . . . I .- .'c.. . . c . L , . . . -, a n d !<GI:.~ , . - . ; . ! I .

I I

Page 11: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

one h a l f the p h y s i c a l o u t p u t c a p a c i t y of t h e r e f e r e n c e shop ; a shop hav ing 5,OCO -

she? !,curs c a p a c i t y h a s t x o znd one h a l f t i x e s t h e p h y s i c s 1 outpu; c a p a c l t y of t h e ,

r e f e r e n c e shop.

E s t i u a t e s of t h e c o s t s of c o n s t r u c t i n g and o p e r a t i n g e a c h of t h e doub le- re fe rence- ,

capacity s h o p s were a l s o o b t a i n e d . C a p i t a l c o s t s were a n n u a l i z e d a{d a f i x e d cha rge

c a p a c i t v c o s t f u n c t i o n f o r e a c h genus was e s t i m a t e d by f i t t i n g a s t n a i g h r l i n e t o I

t h e p o i n t a n n u a l c o s t e s t i m a t e s f o r the r e f e r e n c e and double-referen)ce-shcps. F i n a l l y , I

t h e r e i s a n llpper l i m i t t o t h e p e r n i s s i b l e shop ttme c a p a c i t y of a s j n g l e shop w i t h i n

a g i v e n shop c l a s s . T h i s l i m i t r e f l e c t s two f a c t o r s : o u r i n t e r p o l a t e d f j s e d cha rge

c o s t f u n c t i o n f o r p r o c e s s i n g i n p u t s i s r e a s o n a b l y v a l i d o v e r o n l y a p a r t i c u l a r range;

and, t h e r e a r e sometimes p h y s i c a l l i m i t s t o t h e c a p a c i t y of a s i n g l e shop. I I

A 1 1 s h o p s a r e assumed t o o p e r a t e a t f u l l c a p a c i t y . T h a t i s , t h g volume of I

p r o c e s s i n g by a chop i s t h e s a n e a s i t s c a p a c i t y . 3/ Thus, shops had ing a vo lunc

I

of p r o c e s s i n g l e s s than 2 ,000 shop hours do n o t have e x c e s s c a p a c i t y l a s c a p a c i t y I I

measured i n shop t i n e i s a r e l a t i v e r a t h e r t h a n an a b s o l u t e c o n c e p t . Converse ly , a

volume o f p r o c e s s i n g i n e x c e s s of 2,000 h o u r s i s no t t o b e i n t e r p r e t e d i n t e r n s of

0 3 e r a t i o n i n e x c e s s of " d e s i r e d" o u t p u t o, m u l t i p l e s h i f t o p e r a t i o n . : F i n a l l y , i t

shou ld a l s o be c l e a r t h a t t h e d i f f e r e n c e between a p a r t i c u l a r s h 3 p 1 s ! c a p a c i t y and the I

maximum c a p a c i t y f o r a shop i n i t s r e s p e c t i v e c l a s s dogs n o t r e p r e s e n k e x c e s s c a p a c i t y . I

IIowever, i t does r,ef;ect t h e d e g r e e t o which p o t e n t i a l economies of s k a l c have n o t L - I

been e x p l o i t e d , s i n c e econocnes cf s c a l e f o r a p a r t i c u l a r shop a r e e i b a u s r e d a t a

c a p a c k t y e q u a l t o , where t h e a v e r a g e c o s t of an hour of p r o c e s s i n g ! i s a t i t s Lo.*-er

'9 I

bound. - - a / T h i s is t h e a p p r o p r i a t e a s s u n p t i o n i n a s t a t i c node l focused cn d o t e m i n i n g -

c o m ~ a r a t i v e advan tage i n Lhe z e d i u n t e r n . Bowevcr, i n a dy1:anic a n a l v s i s , t!x p o s s i b l i t y of ex:ess c a p a c i t y x u s t be a d a i t t e d . See C h e n e r ~ (1952) and Hanne ( 1067 ) .

Page 12: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

-, t a k e s :p :h is t a s k . r ; r s t , a cunber 3f r e ; * ~ i r e l conce? rc m u s t b e C e v - z l 2 p e d .

E s c i z a t e s of c o s ~ f o r individual ? r o d u c t i s n activities can onL;~ b e o b t s i z e c

if i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e t h r o u g h c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g i s r . eg lec t=d . Thus, i n what f3115;~5,

w e te rnporar i l j r n e g l e c t c a 7 a c i t y s h a r i n g . The a v e r a g e p r o c e s s i n g c o s t of a .:ieLris

t o n of p r o d u c t i i s g i v e n by:

Average P r o c e s s i n g COSC = : - 17 vk (Bki x i17 /K, + 1 irk Bki . " 'n

The x a r g l n a l c o s t of p r o c e s s i n g a n e t r i c t o n of p r o d u c t i i s s i x p l y Z V 3 . The k k k i

p o i n t s c a l e a l a s t i ~ i t y of r h e p r o c e s s i n g c o s t of p roduc ing a E e t r i c t o n ai p r c d u c t I

i s t h e x a r g i n a l c o s t d i v i d e d by t h e a v e r a g e c o s t : ,- -

E v 5, k t t i

?recessing Cos t P o i n t S c a l e E l a s t i c i t y = k - TiFk - Ck (aki xi)-? /xi +- L vk 3, ti i k li

The p o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y is n o t d e f i n e d f o r v a l u e s of x i t h a t a r e i n f i n i t e s i ~ a l l y less

I t h a n i n t e g e r i ; i u l t i p l e s of Ck/aki, f o r k such t h a t Ski > 0 , f o r t h e s e a r e t h e s c a l e s of

o u t p u t a t whish a a a r g i n a l e x p a n s i o n of o u t p u t r e q u i r e s t h a t a n a d d i t i c n a i f i x e d cha rge

be i n c u r r e d . Were one t o ?lo& t h e p o i n t s c a l e a l a s t l c i t : ~ a s a f u n c t i o n of E U C F C Z , i t

~ - o l ~ l d be found t o h a - ~ e a d t s c o n t i n u o u s downward "juzipl ' s: eocil I n t e g e r m u l t i ~ l e ~f

* c ~ / B ~ ~ , f o r k such chat H k i 0; between t h e s e p o i n t s , t h e e1aS i : i t . y i s a con:iz:~cus,

' 9 .G

i n c r e a s i n z i u n c t i c n of output. - - - I r is p o F s i b i s :o d e c e m i n c a x z s ; ~ ~ ~ p t o t i ~ s s a i e el;scizit>T i ~ h i : ! ~ is the 17--er - i f

I boned ox t h e p o i n t scale c i r ? s ~ l c l t : : . Ccns!iirr tile a v r , i c t l ccc,t - f ;'roc : . s : i i . ~ 2: ,:

Page 13: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

h s y - r p t o t i c P r o c e s s i n g Cost = 7 (Fk/ck) %i + Vk alii X

Averagd c o s t i s minimized a t t h o s e o u t p c t l e v e l s where e v e r y shop employed i n producing

t h e p r o d u c t i s o p e r a t e d a t a c a p a c i t y e q u a l t o i t s naxinu.. p o s s i b l e c a p a c i t y , i . e . wherz I

e c o n o a i e s of s c a l e have been f u - l y e x p l o i t e d . Using t h e ninirnum;value of ave rage cost

t o d a t e r n i n e t h e p o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y y i e l d s the a s y u p t o t i c sc41e e l a s l i c i t y :

Precessing Cost Asymptotic Sca le kl . E l a s t i c i t y =

Depending upon t h e p a r t i c u l a r c o s t components i n c l u d e d i n thb f i x e d and v a r i a b l e I

I c o s t p a r a m e t e r s , t h e d e f i x i t i o n s above y i e l d the p o i n t and a s p p t b t i c s c a l e e l a s t i - i t i e s

I

of c a p l t a l c o s t and v a l u e added. The d e f i n i t i o n of t h e s c a l e e l a p t i c i t y of t o t a l

2 I

p r o d u c t i o n c o s t depends npon t h ~ way i n w h i c i ~ endogenous i n t e r m e d i a t e i n p u t c o s t s a r e I

measured. Endogenous i n t e r n e d i a t e i n p u t s g i v e r i se t o i n d i r e c t e ionomies o f s c a l e , I

w5ereas o u r d e f i n i t i o n s of t h e c a p i t a l c o s t and v a l u e added s c a 1 e ) e l a s t i c i t i e s ~ e r t a i n I

Before t a k i n g up t h i s i s s u e , hoyever , we f r s t g i v e t h e g e n e r a l h_ - I

e x p r e s s i o n s f o r t h e n z r g i n a l and average ( t o t a l ) c o s t s of p roduc i Jg a m e t r i c t o n of I

2 r o d u c t i , as w e l l a s t h o s e f o r t h e p o i n t and a s y m p t o t i c s c a l e e l d s t i c i t i e s . The f o m e r

f o l l o w from t h e s t a t e m e n t of tt.e model: I I I

>!arginzl P r o d u c t i o n Cost a MCi =

- I

Avera'ge' P r o d u c t i o n Cost = ACi =' i ok uk(Bki xi)-7/xi + v Bki + Gi + 5 ' ' k C I

j j i jj 1

u h e r e p j and p ' a r e (shadow) p r i c e s of t h e j ' t i , p r o d u c t p e r me t r ik t o n . The f i r s t t e r n - j I i

i n t h e e x p r e s s i o n f o r m a r g i n a l c o s t g i v e s the marg ina l c o s t of d i r b c t p r o c e s s i n g i n s t l o p s I - - t h e second , the d i r e c t n a r g i n a l exogencus c o s t ; and, t h c t h i r d , thk n a r g i n a l c o s t o f * I 8

1 C

I I - endogenous i n t e r n e d i a t e :nputs, i f t he p measure m a r g i n a l supp ly c o s t s . I n t h e e x p r e s s 5

j I f o r a v e r a g e c o s t , t h e f i r s t t e r n g i v e s t h e average f i x e d c o s t of d i r e c t p r o c e s s i n g

I

i n s h o p s ; the second and t h i r d t e r n s r e s p e c t i v e l y cor respond t o the fLrs: and second I I

terms i n t h e e x p r e s s i o n f o r n a r g i n a l c o s t ; a n d , t h e f o u r t h term g i v e s t h e a-:erage zest I I

of e n d a g e n o ~ ~ s i n t e m e d i z t e i n p u t s , if the measure a v e r a g e s u p p l y i o s c s . ~ I v e r s g e I I

Page 14: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

: ~ s t , e z d c g s n o u s i , - , t emed ia t= L r , ? ~ t s a r e ;13111er! lt t h e i r j v e r a z a s u p ~ l l : c c s i r2r,i:i-r

t 3 a n : h s i r ~ a r g i x a l s u p p l y i s s t . I I

. . The ~ o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i : ? of t o c a l i O 5 ~ i s 3 b t a i ~ e d 5y ? i d i d i n 2 zarz:nz-

I

I

c o s t 57 a v e r a g e c o s t : I I I I

P r o d u c t i o n C o s t ? o i n t S c a l e E l a s t i c i t y = TICi/dC I

i ' I I I I

An a s p p t o t i c s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y f o r t o t a l c o s t nay a l s o be d e f i n e ~ d . S i n c e che oct:cr

I c m p o n e n t s of t o t a l p r o d u c t i o n c o s t e x h i b i t cons ta r : : r e t u r n s t o p c a i e , t h e a v e r a g e

I

c o s t of p r o d u c t i o n i s x i n i n i z e d a t t h e l e v e l of o u t 2 u ~ f o r w h i c h p r o c e s s i n g c c s t is I I

n i n i ~ i z e d . The p r z c e d i n g d i s c u s s i o n of a s l m p t o t i c 7 r o c e s s i n g c o $ t is t h u s r e l e v a n t ,

and vie O D t a i n : I 1

I - A s ~ m ~ t o t i c P r o d u c t i o n Cos t = A = 7 /TF ?/ck) + VI,/ ~~i + Gi : A E - ?? ;

j j i J I I

d v c t i o n C o s t .Xs>m$to-~i.c S c a i e E l a s t i c i t y = > I C ~ / A C ; ; I I

where p? g i v e s t h e a s y n p t o t i c a v e r a g e s u p p l y c o s t of t h e j' t h p l o d u c t . J

I t r ema ins t o s p e c i f ; ? c o r e c o n c r e t e l y now t h e m a r g i n a l , a v e a g e , and a s y n p t o t i c I

c o s t s cf t h e endogenous i n t e m e d i a t e i n p u t s a r e t o be d e r e r n i n e d l C o n s i d e r t h e F o i l c w i r I

l i n e a r p r o g r a m i n g p rob lem, l e r i r e d From t h e o r i g i n a l : I IP model i n 3 manner d i s c u s s e e

~ f u r t h e r below:

1 e

min imize i Ti xi + 7 s u b j e c t t o

i

I xi z7.d y i , i = I* . . , I , g r e a t e r t?:an o r e q u a l t o z e r o ; rr( I m I

-, i s a p r o d u c t i o n c o s t pci ran ter ~ s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e i':n $rsduct:::: ' I C E i - j : y ; A I

I

-3.-C. La:ns co tb.e cake-b~:; c h o i c e l;r,der ~ o : l s c a n t rt!t~::.; :L' L;) . ;es t -~~ ~'I-LL!.:, : i c n i:, t . : ~

I

p r e s e n c e of i n t e r x e d d - i n p u t L n t : r r d e ~ c c , c e t c e . T t 1:u.:;

I I

I ~ I

Page 15: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

D i , i = 1, ..., I, g r e a t e r t h a n o r e q u a l t o z e r o ;

I I

- I I I

where 9 i s t h e d u a l v a r i a b l e t o t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g material b a l a n k e c o n s t r a i n t i n t h e 'i

1 p r i m a l . The two c o n s t r a i n t sets of t h e d u a l may 3e r e p l a c e d by a s n g l e c o n s t r a i n t : 1

I

Thus :he shadow p r i c e o f t h e i ' t h p r o d u c t , pi , i s e q u a l t o t h e r i n i n u n o f t h e impor t I I

p r i c e and t h e c o s t of dome,t ic p r o d u c t i o n . I , I I

The " s u b s t i t u t i o n theorem1' f a n i l i a r f r o n t h e i n p u t- o u t p u t and ( p r o c e s s a n a l y s i s I

l i t e r a t x r e h o l d s f o r t h e p r i n a l l i n e a r p r o g r a m i n g problem. - 9 / hit i s , t h e d v e c t o r I

may be r e p l a c e d by 2 non- nega t ive v e c t o r w i t h c u t a f f e c t i n g t h e c q o i c e b e t v e e n I

produc ing and i m p o r t i n g e a c h p r o d u c t o r t h e v a l u e s of t h e p r o d u c t dhadow p r i c e s . The

s o l u t i o n t o t h e d u a l n o d e l i s t h u s u n i q u e l y de te rmined by t h e va ludls o f t h e iii p a r a n e t e r s . I

T h r e e p a r t i c u l a r c a s e s of t h i s l i n e a r programming problem are r e l e v a n t , e a c h d i f f e r i n g I i n t h e p r e c i s e d e f i n i t i o n of t h e T~ p a r a m e t e r s . 1

- - - - 1 The p r i n a l Y a r q i n a l C ~ s t Hodel : L e t x = i - V k Bki +- Gi, i = 1, . . . , I .

i

l i n e a r program:-ng ndrdel t h e n c o r r e s p o n d s t o t h e HIP model when t h f i x e d c h a r g e s and l-' t h e c o r r e s p o v d i n g i n t e g e r i t y c o n s t r a i n t s a r e t o t a l l y n e g l e c t e d . ~ h k d u a l v a r i a b l e s , c

I i -

g i v e t h e n a r g i n a l c o s t of s u p p l y , pi , f o r each prod$t . I

! L I

I

The p r i n a l l i n e a r progra;;air.g -!ode1 t h e n c o r r e s p o n d s t o t h e :II? c,odc$l ?hen ~!:e i n t e g e r i t : ;

9 / See the c h a p t e r s by Sa;r,celson, Koop.;ins, Arrow, and Ge~rgcsc i ; -RoQgen (respecti- ,el : ' - c h a p t e r s 7 tflrougn 10) i n Xoopnans (1351) . I

I

Page 16: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

. , ,.*. . . s,,.*.e , ,?I,,+, v > ?. ,?, , -1,. .. - = c . i j e c c i - . ~ e f u n c t i o n . I;.? 22s: -:!rl~o:zs, - - - ? ,.-.a :,- - - 3 c L A SL:::-,.. - . .

L 1 f i > Z G L - tp;n ? r o d x t . I

I

I

A s v x ~ t o c i c C o s t :!ocel: I

I

I n this c a s e , t h e p r i a a l z o d e l c o r r e s ~ o n d s t~ t h e YI? -ode1 xhed t h e integeriE1.1 I

c c n s c r a i - t s a r e d ropped and t h e a v e r a g e f i r e d c o s t a t t h e maxindm p o s s i b l e capaci:y io- I l

each s h o p i s c h a r g e d i n r". cbjj+;Live func ; ion . The d u a l v a r i a q l e s , 2 zov g i - ~ s t i e 1 i '

asyz ipzot i : c o s t o f s u p p l y , p $ f o r e a c h p r o d u c r . i

1' I The n a r g i ~ a l and a s p p t o t i c c o s t s o f s u ? p l y a r e i ndependen of outpu: l e - ~ e i s .

gave-:er, t h e a v e r a g e c o s t o f s u p p l y f o r p r o d u c t i depends upon t h e a s s u r e d l e v e l s of I o u r p r : o f - a l l t h e p r o d u c t s , u n l e s s t h e X x a t r i x i s cec:ornposable.( Thus t h e ? r c d u c t i a n ~

I

c o s t ? o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y i s a l s o a f u n c t i o n o; t h e assumed ou~ tpuc l e v e i s af a l l I

t h e d i r e c t and i n d i r e c t endosenous i n t e r n e d i a t e i n p u t s . - 10 /

E s t i z a t e s of S c a l e E l a s t i s i t i e s

F i g u r e 1 g i v e s c u m u l a t i v e f r e q u e n c y d i s t r i b u t i o n s f o r p o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i t i e s

a t t h e e x ~ e c t e d o u t p u t l e v e l s f o r e a c h o f t h e p r o d u c t s a s *dell a a s p p t o t i c s c a i e

e l a s t i c i t i e s o f c a p i t a l c o s t , ~ a l u e added , and ( t o t a l ) p r o a u c t i o c o s t . ( ~ i 1 f i g u r e s '2nd

t a b l e s a.;peJr a t :he 2nd 3 f t h e t e s t . ) The "e : -pec t e l 3 u t p u t l ~ v ~ i " f o ~ a o i t r t i c t ; ~ - r I

, p r o d u c t i s t h e c : , ~ i ; ; e e r s ' e s t i n a t e of t h e a o s l i : : e lv .:olume of $ ro t iucc lon i n 1975 , r_ivc

- - - - t h a t t h e p r o d u c t would be produced d o z e s : i c a i i v ; i t is t h e l e v e l o f O t ~ t . n , t t . (3" : i , o !~~5::; I o f v h i c h tile p a r m e t e r s o f t h e z o d e i :;eve e s t i x a c c d . 21,' -

Economies of s c a l e a r e ?ecesszr i : - , g r e a t e s t i n c a p i t a l c a s t scxew!lat l e s ~ ir ualac I -

. - 101 TIZ znke-bu:: c h o i c e f o r CL ~ a r ~ i c - i a r e r .dogencus i::::i.raedia~d i;1;31:*1 i ; ~ ti:e : : . 1 ~ : : - . - . /

,, ... ' I A

r 6 a s ~ : !c jOel n i a h t r e q u i r c ~~~ J . s y ~ p t o t i i Cos t :.!cdel ; l ; , n t r2c .u- I r e i r . : p o r t % n & . Zn

~ a r ~ i c u l a r enc!pgexous incerr;:el:~:e i n p u t - is rr: -.-,:!~:el! . i_L ' . .

- , . . . - ne ra to r and.':$-enoEi?.ator 7 . 3 : 3:s " i n c o n s i s t e n c y u car.

c ~ c L ~ n ! - inzke-buy c?:;jice. 1 ," . . . . . , . i I/ ' .;ll b f tile , l u r r . e r i c a 2n;t l . .;si 7 r e s c n t e d ;:l;s sr.c-l~:i? :s ,:ler-:-:ei fri.--: :.:k2 .-.- - - . -- . . > - <

. . .. . , ~ ~ r n m r l - tf?r s ; ) t c i f icaticn :.:;,. .; l:i 3cc_ r ~ , . i ; _, ! . I

Page 17: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

added, and c o n s i d e r a b l y l e s s I n t o t a l c o s t . Asymptotic s c a l e e l a s t i c i t i e s a r e zuch

l a r g e r t h a n t h o s e a t expec ted o u t p u t l e v e l s . The f o l l o w i n g t a b l e s u ~ x a r i z e s t h e s e

f requency d i s t r i b u t i o n s i n t e r n s of the averages and s t a n d a i d d e v i a i t i o n s over t!le 120

S u m a r y S t a t i s t i c s from the D i s t r i b u t i o n s of S c a l e E l a s t i y i t i e s I

A t Expected i

Output Leve l s AsyinFt-o t i c

C a p i t a l Cost Average E l a s t i c i t y 0.640 S tandard D e v i a t i o n 0.241

Value Added Average E l a s t i c i t y 0.751 0 1942 S tandard D e v i a t i o n 0 .211 0 + 0 4 1

I

T o t a l Cost Average E l a s t i c i t y 0.870 0.975 Standard D e v i a t i o n 0.147 0,023

, .ao*, I t w i l l be r e c a l l e d t h a t t h e asympto t ic s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y i s t h e l i n i ~ of t h e

p o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y as t h e volume of production approaches an 0 u 4 ~ u t l e v e l a t I

which - a l l shops a r e o p e r a t e d a t the maximum p o s s i b l e c a p a c i t y . The l o w e s t such ou tpu t I

l e v e l , h e r e des igna ted by xa i s t h e l e z s t common m u l t i p l e of t h e de levan t C k / B k i . The i' I

o u t p u t l e v e l s a t v h i c h econoxics of s c a l e a r e f u l l y e x p l o i t e d a r e exltremeiy l a r g e 1

r e l a t i v e t o t h e expec ted o u t p u t l e v e l s , xe. Below a r e g iven statistics frcx t k e i I

d i s t r i b u c i o r s of t h e e x p o n e n t s of xe and if vhen v r i t t e n q i n s c i e n t i f i c n o t n t i o n . 1 I

I

S u m a r y S t a t i s t i c s from the D i s t r i b u t i o n s of xp and x$ - - ' i - Average Standard Yedian >lode Frequenc:~

Output - 3 o n e n t - Deviat ion Exponen t Espcnent , a t >!ode

. - The a v e r s j e expected o u t ? u t le.;el f a l l s between 100 and 1 ,000 z e t r r c t o n s , -2;-2 t h e

2 4 zveragc y ~ a l u e of za exceeds 10 z e t r i c t c n s .

- ~ t ? e c l a s ~ i c i t : ; of c c s t w i t h r e s p e c t :c s c a l e bet:ieen t1:o dlscre:e ?:lr;:s, t t : ~ I

" i r . ' e r 7 ~ a i t?lastici:;:", ::ill i n g e n e r a l e:<ceeci the p o i n t e;asticj.t;: -r.t$~s?lrec 3: ::;c I I

Page 18: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

, . 3 1 e l a s r i c i t ; e s 2'- d i f f s r z n : o x t p u ~ ieve's. Cxrru: st:-- .- f reqdt .-- c:-tri5:t;or.s - r r

shown f o r p o i n t s c a l e e l a s t < c i t i s s a t --e\-eL3 of C G L ~ L Z ?sxa ; t o ize h s l : ( 2 ' .5 '

t v i cc ( c , ) t h e e x ? s c t e d o u t p u t l e v e : s , a s v l l a s 'or r r e e x c e s t s d o u t p u t L e v s l s L

(E:) , and f o r i a t e r v a l e l a s t i c i t i e s f o r a d z u b l i n g o f ~ u t p u t f rom o c e 3215 t h e

I

e r y e c t e d o u t p u t l e v e l s (E ) and f r o n t h e e x p e c t 2 d o u t p u t l a v e i s ( E l ) . !%ere t h 2 . 5

c u m u l a t i v e f r e q u e n c y d i s t r i b u t i o n s o f c o r r e s p o n c ~ i n g ~ c i n t and i n r e n r a l e l a s t i c i t i e s

d i v e r g e , t h e l a t t e r i s shown by a d a s h e d c u r v e .

D i s t r i ' o u t i o n s o f c o r r e s p o n d i n g p o i n t and i n t e r v a l e l a s t i c i t i e s 20 d i v e r g e , h u t

w i t h monor e x c e p t i o n s o n l y a t e l a s t i c i t 1 1 v a l u e s g r e a t e r t h a n 0 .7 . S w m a r y statistics

f r o n t h e s e d i s t r i b u t i o n s a r e g i v e n be low:

Va lue Added P o i n t S c a i e Elasticities -

Simple Ave rage 0 .655 0 .751 0 .82A

S t a n d a r d D e v i a t i o n 0 .250

~ "-

Value AZdcd I n t e r v a l S c a l e E l a s t i c i t i e s

S i n p l e Ave rage

I S t a n d a r d D e v i a t i c n 0 .268 : 0 .228

- The t - t e s c f o r t h e s i g n i f i c a n c e of n e a n d i f f e r e n c e s nay b e x sed Xu e v a i u a t s t h e 2 " ' - y - - -LA.zh L

I I . . e

II betwee-. t h e 2is t r : l ;u: 'L~~ns rf - 2nd Z arlci t h o s e of c , and E 1: f,>:--,~. - . 5 i ' .,- . d

conparison :i:e t - s t a t i s t i : ls 3 . 6 1 ; i n t !~c l a t t e r i r 55 i.2C. : : e i c i ~ e r L:; cl:rse : - ~ : : ~ : l > : - r

-- - -. -------

-- - - - 7 ,. L = (,'Tc(>:,,,) - .. I ;?: ) , : , - i ; ~ ~ e :c: : 5 < $ ::>:z: ,:c: : - - i d x ) -- c . ) j + I/;? -- - .., i -' 7 Vr 'C !- . - .>-, : : ; 5 - i - ( L . - . . a , - . . . . . -. - . -

" 1 .... .. .+ I L , . cs t ; ,~ t_ s c ~ i e , and :i,, is :;:tj ::lg:-.c:r I , : I : . - . . ~ ~ t U ..:a;,?. .....,. -:,: fixed :hz.:,~ C C ~ : -

,.. - L f ~ n c c i ( . , : : i s ,::.cJ, t;je j . 3 y ~ r - ; ; l - c. : .: :-; :,:~~,:;s =.:,rs,: :,. 1 -.. 1 ' . : , - , . - , . c . 7 i i :, .. . . . . . , '

<,- ,, . . . , , .-7 , > . - - . . . - 7 ., .., l..'3;,.' .. ... . . . ' C

Page 19: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t t h e ten p e r c e n t l e v e l i n a o n e- t a i l e d t e s t .

n , e g r a p h of t h e p o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y f o r an i n d i v i d u a l a c t i v i t y a g a i h s t t h e

l e v e l of o u t ~ u t h a s a n ascend i -g "saw- tooth" appea rance , s o t h a t p o i ? t s c a l e

e l a s t i c i t i e s measured a t two p s i n t s nay show a d e c l i n e w i t h t h e l e v e l o f o u t p u t i f I

t h e s e t v c p o i n t s l i e on e i t h e r s i d e of a d i s c o n t i n u i t y i n t h e g r a p h . S o n e t h e l e s s , I

t h e a v e r a g e v a l u e s g i v e n above i n d i c a t e a n i n c r e a s e i n b o t h a v e r a g e b c i n t and i n t e r v a l I

s c a l e e l a s t i c i t i e s w i t h a r i s e i n o u t p u t . I I I I

I t 5 s i n t e r e s t i n g t o c o n s i d e r whe the r s c a l e e l a s t i c i t i e s a c r o s s d i f f e r e n t a c t i v i t i e s I I

b a a r any un i fo rm r e l a t i c n s l l i p t o t h e c o r r e s p c n d i n g l e v e l s o f o u t p u t df t h o s e a c t i v i t : e s . I

I T h i s may be accompl i shed by r e g r e s s i n g v a l u e added e l a s t i c i t y v a l u e s a g a i n s t o u t p u t

I

l e v e l s . o u t p u t i n t h i s c a s e i s measured by t o t a l ( d i r e c t ) v a l u e add id i n t h e a c t i v i t y . I

- Df t h e s e v e r a l f u n c t i o n a l f o m s t r i l d , t h a t which gave t h e most z l ean ingfu i relations hi?^ ~ was t h e f o r n : E l a s t i c i t y = I n n, + 3 I n (Value Added), where a and 2 lare p a r a m e t e r s

I . ._ .. li

jihose v a l u e s a r e t o be e s t i m a t e d . The r e s u l t s of f i t t i n g t h i s f u n c t d o n a l f o m a r e

g i v e n below: I

I I

R e g r e s s i o n s of E l a s t i c i t i e s a g a i n s t Value Added 1 I 13 / l

a, 6 I "n - 2

i E s t . - t - s t a t . - st. t - p t a t .

P o i n t E l a s t i c i t i e s I I I

I n t e r v a l E l a s t i c i t i e s

n; t o 2 X? 0.83 1 .53 .078 84 14 .36 ? I . I

I

!.#%ile e a c h of t h e s e r e g r e s s i o n s i s s i g n i f i c a n : a t t h e .01 l e v e l , and i n d i c a t e s hL,g':;t.r

'7

e l a s t i c i E i e s a t h i g h e r o u t p u t ;e;els, t h e X- a r c r a the r low. The u : i e x ? l a i ~ e d v a r l ~ ? . c e

.is due t o d i f f e r e n c e s i n the c c ~ ; o s i t i o n of tile procc.;si;lg t a s k s r e ~ u i r e t i i n 22:h

p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i ty, axd, t o d i f f e r c n c e s i n d e g r e e s o f i n c r e a s i n g re turns $3,1.:;g ti:c:se : , ! s ; : s .

I

131 The : - s t a t i s t i c i n :h is . 2 a . s ~ z e r t a i n s t o t h e ~ < ~ < i f i c n : ~ c : e ci :!:c I c s r l - : a t z 1 s - 3 . - - 1,

Page 20: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

t h r o u g h c:le u s e cf e n d o g e n o u s ir.terr;.t?dia<e ir.:,;~:s. ilr,n-:.zntl.cr.al +sns : s ass?ss

? o t e n t l a l I C ( i n p u t- o u t p u t ) i n t e r d s ~ s x C e n c e I s r o e x a x l 3 ~ ~ $ 2 s : rxc tp re cf t h e I I

n b n a t r i x o f endc genous i n t e r r , e d l a t e i n ~ u t r e q u i r e z e c t c o e f f i c i e n t s . :1!1e h -a:rl;; 12 c:-.c

I . . Korean i - -p l emef i t z t i an e x h i b i t s 2 c i r c u l a r i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e a3or.g endbgexous ix:erec:n:z

I

i n p u t f l o v s , s o i t is 2 o s s i b l e t o o r d e r p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s (and ibnce ?rodu;;s iis I I

w e l l ) i n s u c h a way t h a t X = 0 f o r i > j , which y i e l d s a n upFer t r i / i n g u l a r .A ~ ~ e t r L s . :;/ i j I - I

A more h i g h l y d ;saggregated i ~ p l e n e n t a t i o n rnl.ght e s h i b i t c i r c u l a r i n t e r d e ? e n d e s c e ; l

and , i n a dyna-iic c o d e l t h e r e v o u l d be c i r c u l a r i n t e r d e p r n d a n c e o v e r ( t i z e s i c c e :%

i denand f o r a number of s a p i t a i goods a p p e a r i n g i n t h e n o d e l ? ~ o u l d th4n b e ecdogen izsd .

I I

The A n s t r i x i s a l s o q u i t e sparse; i t s d e n s i t y i s o n i y .O422. The a 4 e r a g e nunber of I I

endogenous i n t e m e d i a t e i n p u t s a o n g t h e 106 ? r o d x c t i o n a c t t v i t i e s r d q u i r i c g t h e n is I

I 5 .8 , w i t h a s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n of 4 . 4 . F i g u r e 1 g i v e s t h e c m , u l a t i v ~ f r e q u e n c y

d i s t r i b u t i o n .

The d e n s i t y o i t h e A - . a t r ix and t h o number of endogencus in:emeldiate i n p u t s per I

p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t y g i v e on ly a vague L a p r e s s i o n of t h e d e g r e e s f I0 l in re rde j a n i e n c e . I I

To o b t a i n a ore d i r e c t ineasure k-e n u s t ask ":her, does i n t e r d s p e n d e n c k ' r r .a tc~r '?" . I I I

One answer i s t h a t i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e n a t t e r s , o r is s i g n i f l c s n t , hen t e o p t i ~ a ; 4- d e c i s i o n ( i . e . t!lat f r o m t h e o p t l r a l s o l u t i o n t o t h e ? I T 1 7 ,odcl) w i t h /esps:: ic a ~ r r d u c t ' . - - LcveL 0.5 produilicn i s n o t t h e sdnc ;IS t h e d c c i s l o n o b t c ? i > c l c-n ;he b k s i s 3 f r,n

- c v a l u a t g n xe ti.ci! c h a t r.ag?cc ts < s t s r d e p e n d e n c e . :4i t h i r ~ t hi is-dledze of the ~ $ i : > c i :

,. -.. * I . - . d e c i s i c n , n'wever, ;.e obviousl:: c a n n o t c c r p a r e i t ;o t h e .!ec<s?.~n rr_4;:7eL: L;.-<:z 2 - t l - - . ,

Page 21: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

.rt,epends cpon d e c i s i o n , t a k e n w i t h r e s p e c t r o . t h e i r p r o d u c t i o n . g/ 11-a a b e n e f i t - c o s t

a n a l y s i s of a s i n g l e a c t i v i t y , e l c b endogenous i n t e r r ' e d i a t e i n p u t shou ld be v a l u e d

at i t s s a r g i n a i s u p ~ l y c o s t , which i s e i t L e r i t s wor ld marke t i g p o r t p r i c e l o r i t s I

z a r g i n a l c o s t of p r o d u c t i o n , depending upon v h e t h e r i t i s o p t i m a l l y inpor:dd o r I

produced. :.;e ;-ill d i s t i r ' g u i s h - between two d i f f e r e n t ways of computing t h e l p r o d u c t i o n

c o s t of a p a r t i c u l a r p r o d u c t : " c o s t a t doroes t ic p r i c e s " , i n which e a c h endo\genous I

I .

i n t e r c e d i a t e i n p u t is v a l n e d ac t h e l e s s e r of i t s i n p o r t p r i c e and i t s margbnal c o s t ,

of p r o d u c t i o n ; a d , " c o s t a t wor ld p r i c e s " , i n which each endogenous i n t e d e d i a t e I I

i n p u t i s v a l u e d a t i t s i a p o r t p r i c e . C l e a r l y , i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e m a t t e r s i f t $e p r o d u c t ' s I

c o s t a t d o m e s t i c p r i c e s i s les_s_ chan i t s impor t p r i c e w h i l e i t s c o s t a t wor id p r i c e s I

e x c e e d s i t s i n p o r t p r i c e , f o r t h e n t h e make-buy c h o i c e w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e 4 rcdEc t I

depends c r i t i c a l l y upon whe the r i t s endogenous i n t e r n e d i a t e i n p u t s a r e o p t h l a l l y ,

produced o r i n p o z t e d . I f c o s t a t wor ld p r i c e s is l e s s t h a n t h e p r o d u c t ' s i n b o r t p r i c e , !

o r i f c o s t a: d o n e s t i c p::i.ces exceeds t h e p r o d u c t ' s i m p c r t c o s t , t h e n t h e nake-buy - i h o i c e i s u n a f f e c t e d by nake-buy c h o i c e s f o r o t h ~ r p r o d u c t s , e x c e p t i n s o f a r 4s t h e

! I

l a t t e r a f f e c t t h e demand f o r t h e p r o d u c t . , I I

The c o n c e p t of " c o s t a t d o m e s t i c p r i c e s " needs t o be c l a r i f i e d , f o r t h e \ m a r g i n a l

c o s t of y rodoc lng a n endogenous i n t e r n e d i a t e i n p u t dooends i n t u r n upon iihethler i t s I

endogenous i n t e m e d i a t e i n p u t s a r e produced o r impor ted , which is a f u n c t i o n bf t h e I . r

3 v e r a l l p a t t e r n o f p r o d u c t i o n . khat ik r e a l l y wanted i s a l o v e r bound on cosk a t I

i o m e s t i c p r i c e s , which c a n be o b t a i n e d i f each e ~ ~ d o g e n o u s i n t e m e d i a t e i n p u t 4s v a l u e d - I - I

~t i t s minimum n a r g i n a l supp ly c o s t . 'The l a t t e r i s g i v e n by p i detcrmided :rdn :he 6

I I - f a r g i n a l Cos t .\lode1 d i s c u s s e d above. I - !

t 1

A measure o f I0 i ! te rdepende; lce i s t h u s p r o v i d c u by t h e d i f f e r e n c e %et:jeen c o s t

t v o r i d p r i c e s 2nd c o s t a t d o n e s t i c p ; ices . (The conc!usion c c n s i d c r s y.~hy t h e s e night

i i f e r . ) ,.'e wiiZ nor ina l i ze t t ? i s d i f f e r e ~ c c t h i s d i f f e r e n c e by e :<z res s ing 1: as n p c r i e : : ~

I ,,e d f IC: in:erc:c~c;-.l i~r;j; l , n L ::;: 5 / - T h i s Faper i s ia rge l : ; < c : ~ c e r z e d ; ; i t t i :!>e " ;>rLce" s'.ri

I

Page 22: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- 7

$1 r ~n ,? : l abe l . leL "Endogeao:~ ; n t cmed la ie Ir:nu; l:ostf' r e r t z i n s ;{ :he

. , perce:;caee d i f f s r ? n c % 5jet;jeen t h e *;a iue zf 2 n i o g e : : ~ u s i n t e r . . e i i l z ~ e ir.;~-:ds ct ;.:orir:

I

? r i c e 5 a n d t h a t a,; docestic ? r i c e % ; I

~ S?.dogcr:cus In ternedia tc- . I n p u t 2 2 5 t ::?asurn =

-,

f" ! !

Page 23: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- . T h i s Zeascr-l has r a r t i c x l a r sign;:- rcna:e b e c ? x s ? , i n t!ie a b s e n c e of caca<i t : \ ' .-:.ar;,l, - - i t c s n be s l c : . ~ zo g i - e a n y ? ? e r 5z-nC t o t h e 3 3 s t ~f n s g i e c ~ l n g i n t e r d e p e r - d e n z e

>fI? objec:iy:e f u ~ c c i z n val-e 5ue :c h a v i n g xada t h e . ~ ~ r o n g d e c i s i o n on rbe~3'asf~.'of a

p a r t i a l , b e c e f i t - c o s t c r i t e r t o c . - i 6 / Tke z a r g i n a l c o s t z e a s u r e i s p ~ s i t i - ~ ~ e in E?,?

s a j o r i t y o f c a s e s . However, i n nz case d o e s i t exceed 20 p e r c e n t . The l a r g e d i f f e r e - c e

S e t u e e n v a l u e s of t h i s z e a s u r e and t > o s e cf t h e ecdogenous i n ~ e n e d i a t e ifipuK c o s t

z e a s u r e i s due t o t h e r e l a r i v e u n i s p o r t a n c e of endogenous i n t e m . e d i a t e i n ? u t s i n t o t a l

p r o d u c t i o n cost , which I s f i l r t h e r d i s c u s s e d be low.

The l a s t o e a s a r e of I0 i n t e r l e p e n d e n c e i s t h a t w i t h r e s p e c t t o ave raSe c o s t a t

t h e e x p e c t e d i e v e l of o u t p u r . I t l z c k s t h e s i g n i f i c a n c e o f t h e m a r g i n a l c o s t x e a s u r e ,

f o r a v e r a g e c o s t h a s no p r e s c r i ; l t i - ~ e s i g n i f i c a n c e . Y o i ~ e t h e l e s s , i t i s of scme i n t e r e s t .

The a v e r a g e c o s t n e a s u r e cco;pz.res x J e r a g e p r o d u c t i o n c o s t when endogenous i n t e m e d i a t e

i n p u t s a r e v a l u e d a t i n ? o r t p r i c e s v i t h a v e r a g e p r o d u c t i o n c o s t when endogenous

i n t e r m e d i a t e i n p u t s a r e v a l u e d a t ;he l e s s e r of a v e r a g e p r o d u c t i o n c o s t and impor t

p r i c e , i . e . a t p i t a k e n f rom t i e Average C o s t Hade l d i s c u s s e d above . A s i n t h e o t 3 e r

z e a s u r e s , t h e d i f f e r e n c e i s e x p r e s s c 5 a s a p e r c e n t of t h e f o m e r a v e r a g e p r o d u c t i o n

c o s t . !Je vili @;;\it a s t n t e c e ~ . ~ o f tF.e a a t h e n ~ a t i c a l f o r m u l a , f o r i t nay be e a s i l y i n i t t e n

dosm by t h e reader . As t h e n a r g i n a ; c o s t E e a s u r e v i t h r e s p e c t t o a p a r t i c u l a r ? T G ~ U C E

may be s h o ~ n t o 5e l e ss t h a n h x cql-al t o t h e e n d o g e n o u s ' i n t e r a e d i a t e i n p u t c o s t -.easure,

S O nay t h e aa:eragc c o s t n e a s u r e I:e s!;cr;r: t o b e less t h a n o r t :qual t o ::!)e : - ; rg i~ ln l c o s t

- measure . F i g i ~ m 3 c l e a r l y 2 e : n o ~ s c r s c c s t h i s r e l ~ t i o n s : ~ Lp.

.a 6

The tab le- below g i v e s a v e r a g e ;-al-es f c r e a c h o f c!;e r e a s u r e s o v e r :he 106 r r c d E c t i o r . - B a c t i v i t i e s r c q 3 r crldogcnons I;::er-ebiate i n p c c s : t

iralues of the :.!eas.:r.-s cf I0 1 n : c r d e ~ c n d e n c e (percent:-

$'-p:e t \ v e r 3 ~ , ~ St;?r.~!arii. Dp~:Lr; t iLn .. A ... - Endogcr.ous I n t e ~ e d i a t e I~. ;LEs 39.9 2 ; . 3

: I a r g i n a l C a s t 5 . 7 3 . -t t?*~.?ragr Cos: A.6 -. . I

Page 24: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

c f A.vs . - L G g e ,-- :n 71 J I - t n e . L - u . q n c;L- .--.-i..; ,.ies. I I

I

1 ., . . . . . C . L ? . . : . : ~ ~ G X , ' " ; r o c ~ s ~ . e:~i::er,: ;p~.c-i;,?&tes a she.;., 2:~s; -: i-,.c: its. :! T: i. ' - ' '-,---

. , . .- ..... c

. .

; , I s ;, - en . , ' I 1: , - L C is u s e d i ? - ; h e rsduction cf ? o r e . r3a:i a single proclac. . 1 . .

+3: :. - .;-. -. -., ., - A . L ..;e ;!a-je 30: ):et c , - n s i d c ~ ? c ! s :??ut ians C P ?.!IF i ) ~ c k ~ ; e : ~ l , ;ie il41i cnl:: -s?e::::

~

Page 25: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

;.notk?r I 3 d i s a t i o n o f t h e ;cte.-.Ciai s i g c i f i c e n c e of c a ~ a c i t y i n t e r d e p e n e e n c e

i s g i v e n ir. T z S l e 1, :i:?ish gi':.--s a ~ r c s s - t a b u l a t l a n of tTzo characteristics of eacI:

? r c d u c t < = r , z:ti7qLc::: a c r o s s :he cc:x.r.s a r e s:?c~.T. t k e ?.cr'cer cf p r o c ? s s ( e l ecen r , s I

r e q u i r e 2 i3 t h e p r o d ~ c t r o n cf 3 2 ~ r r i c ~ ~ l a r p r o d x c r ; d o n t h e r c v s a r e sh~c.,.~ t h e ' & ~

I

nunber of c-ene p r o c e s s e l e z e c t s xhlch xay p c ~ e z ~ i a l l : ~ be s3arsd w i t h other p r o d u c t i c n -

I

a c t i v i r i e s . To g i v e an er rzzple of >.OW t5.e t a b l e i s i o 3e r e a d , cons ider1 tts e n t r i e s

i n zhe c o l u z n headed by t h e-unber 3: a t o t a i cf t e n ; r o d u c t l o n a s t i v i t i k s r e q u i r e s I i

~ r o : e s s i n g i n p u t s from t h r e e p r e c e s s e l e x e n i s ; Ln :zc 05 t h e s e a c t i v i t i e i , ~ n i y one I I

of t h e t ! ~ r e e ? r s c e s s e l e x e n t s i s p c t e n t i a l l y s h a r e d , T;hereas i n s i x of t$,en, s i i t h r e e

I p r c c e s s s l s z e n t s a r e p o t e n t i a l l y sb.ared. I

I Onl:; f i v e ou; of t h e 129 p r c d ~ c t i o n a c t : - ~ i ~ i e s e x h i j i t 20 potentialli~terde?endence

i - ihroug!l c i z z c i t y s h a r i a g . O r t h e c t h e r hand, 46 o u t of t h e 120 a c t i v i t i a s e i i i b i t ;he

I

naxixur? ~ o t e n c i a l i i : te raeper ,dence , r eq1~ i r i r . g ?recessing c 2 l y i n potential l l : : s h a r e d I

proccs-5 e l e z e n r s . The r e n a l n i n g a c t i v i t i e s f a l l betxeen t h e s e t v o extre- 'es , S u t ."I

h genera.11:; :;he nu,cber of p o t e : l t i a l l y s!lared p r c c e s s e l e z e n t s i s g r e a t e r t h n :.3e ~ u z b e r

G £ un-shar.?d T r o c e s s e.lerr.ents. I

I T h e c r c s s - t a b u l a t i o n ir. I a b l e 1, v h i l e Kcre s a c i s f a c c o r y th,n t h e d e b s i t y Z e a s u r e ,

I I

f a i l s t o t a k e a c c o u n t of s o c t d i f f e r e n c e s amocg p r c c e s s e l e n e a r s . ~ i ~ u r e i i g i v e ; -!ie

c u m u l a t i v e f r e q u e n c y d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e p r o p o r t i o n of shop c o s t i n p o t e n i i a l l y s h a r e d I J , r p r o c e s s e l e z e n t s a t t h e e x p e c t e d o u t p i t l e v e l s f o r t h e 120 p r o d u c t i o n a c t y v i t i e s . i

"Shop c o s t " r e f e r s t o t h e t o t a l c o s t of t h o s e ~ r c c e s s i n g ' n p u t s which e :chib i t i n c r e a r i r g I

: I r e t u r n s -- c a p i t a l a n d i r i d i r e c t l a b o r ' and n a i e r i a l s . Cn a v e r a g e , 7l4.7.4e;cent o f t h e

I

t o t a l shop c o s t i n c u r ~ e d i n p r o d u c t l c n i s i n .;ocent',ali:: s h a r e d p r o c e s z e1,e:nents. i. o r I

e ; n o r e t h a n ;;air' of the-activities, p o t e n t i a l l y s h a r e d ?recess e i e n e n t s ;ecolunr: i a r r.cre

:ban 40 p e r c e n t of she? cos:. I t i s t o 5e ~ o t e ? t 5 a : t h c s e f i g x r e s a r c c?-,er ?.-l:r.Cs

/ . - on t h e p r e p c r t i o n c i sho? c c s t IT. ;.:::a112 s h a r e ? ~rzzcrs e l c x e n ~ s , S F T C E t h e :. . - i - : . . : ~ : l ~

- - . n r . . . . . . c f p o t e n t i a l s h a r i r ~ g r.jould be rca!i zed zn: ;; ;.ere z,- > r ~ ~ . ; ~ t i ~ ~ zc :ivl';<e:: -.: 8 .

o p e r a t e d .

Page 26: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

. . i . . . . . . . y'.-,c - .,. ,,- . . . , LI.-- :CP. - 2 ~ 3 : s : 2 2 9 n o t '22 h s c r ~ : , " d=r ~ x a l . r ~ c : ; s ~ ~ Z ' J Z ~ : T ~ : S ( . :T: n r h e r -.LL?. . 3 .;:.<--~:

. I I . -

2 ~ 5 5 - r . z ry fas:?.,5;., 1 : ~~~:~~~~ :J a:; ~ a , ~ ~ - ; ~ ~ x ~ i $ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ 1 ST!:; ~2 .:!,? ~5 Le; -;:--: -- --- I

<,,t - - v - f l .,-,. i;,,c~s ?otentiz?l:; produced wi th i : , it. i I

-. . - . 1 . 1:;ers ~ r i t .z nu ...; ,er sf spi.~:::: mensuro,s 3f ? c t e n t - l a 1 ~z~z : iT ' ) ; : . x r e r d ~ ; : ~ ~ e . n c c , ~

Page 27: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

I t i s 2 z s i l v d e ~ o n s t r a t e d t>at t h e sncp c o s t 7 .easure is lsss t h a n t h e 5iue.d cos:

s e a s u r e , f c r t h e v a r i a b l e ccn;3nen: of sho? c c s t is rhe same w i t h azd wic>.out s k a r i r . ~ . I

A :. g o e n t t s r e f l e c c i o n c i l l s u f f i c e t o e s t a b l i s h t h a t t h e p c t e b t i a l f i x e d cc s ; I

t L s a v j c g s d u e t o c a p a c i t y s h a r i r s denends upon th2 ncmber c f shops r q u i r e d ~ ~ ~ i t h i n t h e I I

?recess e l m e n t w i t h o u t s h a c l z g and the n u ~ n b e r of production a c t i v t i e s r e q u i r i - g i f ipu t ; t f r o 2 t h e p r e c e s s e l e m e n t . T h i s f o l l o w s b e c a u s e t h e n a x i n u n p o s s i b l e r e d u c t i o n i n t i e

n l laber of s h o p s r e q u i r e d u n d e r s h a r i n g i s e q u a l t o t h e number of p o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s r z!ros c z e . x/ Given t h e n u s b e r of p r o d u c t i o n s c t i v i t i e s , t h e n a x b u n p o t e a t i a i s ~ v i i l g s

I

j s g r e a t e r t h e f e w e r t h e nuxbe r of s h o p s r e q u i r e d w i t h o u t s h a r i n g ; g i v e n t h e nmber of

I s n o ~ s r e q u l r e d w i t h o u t s h a r i n g , t h s na :<in~m 7 o t e n t i a : s a v i n g s i s g + e a t e r t h e i a r g e r t h e 1 n u n b e r of p r o d u c t i o n ~ d c t i v i t i e s .

7- : r 3 u r e . 5 g i v e s s e v e r a l . c u z u l a t i v e f r e q u e n c y , d i s t r i b u t i o n s of h e n u n b e r o f s h o p s t r e q u i r e d i n i n d i v i d u a l F r o c e s s E. .Ren t s . These a r e b a s e d on t h e e p e c t e d l e v e l s cf li o u t p u t . ' P l a t l a b e l e d "Vnshared P r o c e s s " c e ~ i e n t s " p e r t a i n s t o t h e 1 5 4 p r o c e s s e i en l en t s ~ r e q u i r e d i- b u t a s l n g i e p r c d u c t i o n a c t i v i t y . Cr.e s n c p i s needed I n t h e n a j o r i r ; , , 1 2 5

t o b e e x z c t , of t h e u n s h a r e d F r o c e s s e l e m e n t s . The g r e a t e s t n u b e of s h o p s r e q u i r e c

i n a n u n s h a r e d p r o c e s s e l e m e n t i s 100. Tvo c a i n u l a t i v e f r e q u e n c y d A s t r i b c t i o n s a r e t g i v e n f o r a l l p r o c e s s e l e n e n t s , u n s h a r e d and p o t e n t i a l l y s h a r e d a l ' k e . That l a b e l e d

"With S h a r i n g" p e r t a i n s t o t h e n m b e r of s h o p s ceeded when f u l l ad a n t a g e i s t aken of I . sha r ing among t h e i 2 0 p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s . . TRa t l a b e l e d " U l t h o u t S h a r i n g" i s based cn

I

t i . . a s s u m p t i o n t h z t 1'0 a d v a n t a g e w h a ~ s c e v e r i s t a k e n of p o t e n t i a l { h a r i n g : i n o t h e r i o r d s ,

a p r o c e i s e l e m e n t i s assumed t o . i n v o l v e d i n t h e product i .on of o d l Y a s i n g l e j r ~ d u c t . & I

The nurnber of p r o c e s s e l e n e n t s 05 t h i s a s s u n p t i c n i s o i c o u r s e ir.ucd l a r g e r than i n t h e

* I I

c a s e s j i t h s h a r i n g : t i le nydribers am r e s p e c t i v e l y 802 znd 305. The r /unber 502 c o r e s f r c r I

t h e facr !!-at t h e 3 m a t r i x c a n t a i x s 802 ncn -ze rc e l e y e n c s . I

Page 28: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

ca-,zzit;: s h a r i n g ~ e ~ i t s a ? o t e n c l a i raduc t i . on b1.7 greater :hz:. 5 b 2ercer.t i n +!it3 ::L!::?+L. I

. - . . of s n c ? s r e q u i r e - . Tke s a v i n g s is substantia?lp l e s s .<hen s - - - - - c ~ c c z n t e z x sf -;;:cr, 20s : . I

. - :ic~zt?,,a? e s s , shop c s s t i r p c t e r i t t a l l y rsd7,ced by -nois t h n 50 ?erceri: : 12 13 ;.c----- - e L . L ~ 2 .-:-

I

I - . sk2:zZ ? r a c e s s e lenencs , a d Sy :gre than 25 percsn: i n 2 9 o r z : + s c . 7-2 z-:ersge I

? o c s n t i a l f i x e d cosr savings is 33.0 p e r c e n r , xhile :he average b c ~ e z ~ i a i s h o ~ -0s: 1 I

savicgs is 1 G . 9 percen:. - 20/ 1

Page 29: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

III. The Consequences of I n t e r d e p e n d e n c e

The f o r e g o i n g a n z l y s i s d e n o n s t r z t e s t h a t t h e model a s implenqnted i n t h e Korelil I

c a s e e x h i b i t s s u b s r z n t i a l i n c r e a s i n g r s t x r n s a s 1.211 as s i g n i f i c a n t d e g r e e s of p o t e n t i a l

a r e b e l i e v e d t o be q u i t e c l o s e t o t h e g l o b a l opt ima; i n any e v e n t , it is k n o w t h a t :>r;i

g i v e upper bounds t o t h e g l c b a l l y o p t i z a l v a l ~ e s of t h e x i a t h e f $ l l YIP n o d e l i \

augnen ted by t h e p r c d u c t i o n upper b o u n d s . z / I I I

I

i n p n t - o u t p u t and c a p a c i t y i n ~ e r d e p e n d e n c e . !i'e now tu r r ; t o examine i the consequences by I

- I

referenc:e t o s o l u t i o n s t o t h e :;IP nociei. Because of cke l a r g e n u d e r of i n t e g e r 1

v a r i a b l e s c o n t a i n e d i n r h e ~ o d e l , and hence t h e h i g h c c s t a n t i c i p a d e d t o o b t a i n p rovea

I

A s i n d i c a t e d i n T a b l e 2 , s o l u t i o n s v e r e o b t a i n e d under n i n e a l ( e r a n t i w i e s ? e c i f i c a t i o n s

g l o b z l l y o p t i m a l s o l u t i o n s , w e d i d n o t a t t e n p t t o u s e a f o r a a l x i x e d

I of t h e key p a r a m e t e r s . To t e s t f o r t h e e f f e c t s of e c o n o n i e s of scal le, t:~c s e t s o f upper 1 bounds v e r e used i n a d d i t i o n t o t h e expec ted o u t p u t l e v e l s . I n s p e c l i f i c a t i o n s 51 and 53

I

i n t e g e r ? rograming

I

t h e u p p e r bounds a r e r e s p e c t i v e l - i one h a l f and t w i c e t h e expec ted oultput l e v e l s . I n I

a l g o r i r h o . I n s t e a d , us o b t a i n e Z a s o l u t i o n under each pa ramete r s p L c i f i e a t i o n u s i n g a I

methcd t h a t is s k e t c h e d i n :he Appendix. T h i s ne thcd r e q u i r e s that1 upper bcunds on t5.e I

p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s b e added t o t h e n o d e l . Given t h e s e upper b o u n l s , t h e s o l u t i o n s I

I

compar ison t o t h e b z s i c r p e c i f i c a t i o n , F1 and F3 i s o l a t e t h e i n p a c t b f a 33-113 p e r c e n t I I

r e d u c t i o n and i n c r e a s e r e s p e c t i v e l y , i n t h e f o , r e i g n exchange r a t e , { ~ h i l e t h e a v e r a g e L I

I

w d g e r a t e i s r e s p e c t i v e l y i n c r e a s e d by 50 and 100 p e r c e n t i n s p e c i f i l a t i o n s L? and L 3 . I

F i n a l l y , t h e e f f e c t s of a 50 p e r c e n t r e d u c t i o n and i n c r e a s e , r e s p e c t i v e l y , i n t h z ' d

i n t e r e s t r a t e nay be e v a l u a t e d t!lrough s p e c i f i c a t i o n s Kl and K3. 22/) I - i ic i i iz eacR p n i r , I - -

s o l u t i o n s a r e o r d e r e d i n ' l a b i e d s o t h a t t h e pnraineter ~ ~ e c i f i c a r i o n f o r w h i c h l p e s t i c I

I I

p r o d u c t i o n c o s t s a r e l e z s t r e i a t i ~ e t o i z - ,o rc c c s t s appears on t!:e l d i t .

Page 30: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

. . IrcS,?cs i -r ;:hich t:?e L i C Z X X = ~ s r g l r . a l c o s t or' prcui~c:Lcr, :.:.r: ;,:- :c +:

i~3~.=3 (1;; > a r e i:: a c l a s s 5:; t 'r..enselves f i.r the:; a r e c n r i r ---- ?gli:; i2.sr>rr.^.l2 I;T~S;=- ;l.,;~ A I - - -

I - .

c f c z ~ z c i t y sh,arlr?g. >n.or.g tI.2 remaining a c t i v i t i e s , -;:.e 3.2. a l ? d l c a t s < zhc -...----- .. -..,L t. -

2 r o l - c e i at

-'. e;, p r c 2 u z e d oelow t h e naxinurn e i ~ p c t level -z i :ho~c s l ~ a r i n g . ,VIL., but1 O C . ~ escep:lc-2 c.v-.:

2;: r:-.e specifications, i k e r ? t i s e l ouipu: lev?: i s r s i o if i: is Less t!?a- i k e z~:-:.~,Lx

I ;!ut l e v e l .

Li .32 3 .3 i n d i c a t e s t h e z u i ~ b e r u f p r a l u c r i produces unde r sbari::g. O ~ c e -:-aclr:;

s h a r i n g Is p e r m i t ~ e d , production is r i a r r a n r e d f o r s e v e r a l

;reduced i n i t s a b s e n c e . F o r e x a n p l e , t i 4 0 ( 6 1 n i n u s 59)

a c t i v i t i e s become p r o f i t a S l e when c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g is

specification. I n a l l c a s e s , if i t is p r c f i t a b l e t o aryor.d p r o d u c ~ i o n u n d e r iipaci:?

s h a r i c g , t h e n i t i s p r o f i t a b l e t o do s o t o t h s rnasii;.u~-, f f e z s i b i e ex e n t . ?:c:.t slz;;:fi.:c=:-

. . t o :he cot&: number of ?rodu:tic?n a c t i v i t i e s i n tile n o i ? ~ i . :i~r.c?:!: ~ C S T , a s n e .:;;!IK

eTJ.pect, c n p a c t r y s h a r i n g i.5 ~f g r e a t a s t irnyortan.:e a t :r,e !L>h;es: a of

- 1 . :. - - . , L - ,.<-,: t:m ~n::izun o u t p u i l e v l s , S 1 , ;.liere e i g h t make-buy :-.i:c;'ces a r e revers,.? 3 : ~ i'.: i--.-..

i n t o [he anal.:ir;:s. . ; 'art sz c;l the r n i . i e gi:.: .3 :oc-. l ~ 3 1 2 ~ adctt'.:! <:.I :1:.:~.1 ~r;:,~i?~:y lL>::, . . . . . . : , 3 . +. f i t i c - . . ! . . . .. -.

, . ~ - . --

Page 31: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

f 0 r . e ~ i s e q u a l t o t h e la::er l e s s :he c c t a l f i x e d c c s t s . Tp,ese e s t i n a t e s pertain ~2

a11 e q u i - p r o p o r t i o n a l expar . s icn cf t h e o u t p u t of a l l t h e p roCuc t s produced ~ 5 t h s ? , a r l ~ . - 5 - 3 i x c 2 f i x e d c o s t s a r e g r e a r s r i n t h e a b s e n c e of c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g , ~ c o n o c i ~ s of s c a l e ;re

u n i f o z 1 y g r e a t e r x i r h o u t ~kiring. On a v e r ~ g e , Lhe d i f f e r e r i c e i s b.5 1 J r i 27 i of t k e

e l a s t i c i t y v i t h s h a r i n g .

E f f e c t s c f Caps : i t y I n t e r d e ~ e c d e n c e

. . . -..av~ng l a i d t h e n e c e s s z r y f o u n d a t f o x s , we nag now examins t h e ( consequences of I

i n t e r l e p e n d e n c e i n the p r e s e n c e of increasing r e t u r n s . Ice w i l l r e v r s e t h e o r d e r of t h e i ? r s c e i i n g s e c t i o n azd i n i t l a l i y t a k e LQ t h e e f f e c t s of c a p a c i t y

r i r s ~ l i c e of f i g u r e s i n Par t E of T a b i e 2 g i v e s t h e r e a l i z e d

z o s t s as a F e r c e n c of t o t a l fiscd c o s t s w i t h o u t s h a r i n g o v e r

p roduced u i t 5 s h a r i n g . TEe r e a l i z e d s a v i n g s i n t o t a l f i x e d c o s t s ib 2 4 . 6 p e r c e n t L?

t h e S a s i c spec i f ica : i .cn . -2-s a p e r c e n t of t c t a l v a l u e added , t h e c s t savLngs i s of i c o u r s e zuch l e s s ; i t is on::: 3.3 p e r c e n t ( s e e t h e f i g u r e s on l i n e E 1 . b ) . Lcokizg I a c r o s s t h e c a b l e , c z e s e e s :?at t h e c o s t s a v i n g s due t o capacity s a r i n g i s a f f e c t e d d by c h a n g e s i n t h e ke:: p a r a z e z e r s , p a r t i c u l a r l y t h e l e v e l of denand. As s i g h t be es- ,ecrei i ,

t h e c c s t s a - l i n g s i s a?precFa- . ly i i i ghe r i n r e l a t i v e t e r n s a t lower s c a l e s cf c u t ~ c t .

:lore i n t e r e s t ' n g i s t h e c i i e c t of c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g c n make-buy c k i c c s f c r i i i d i - i i d u i ?

p r o d u c t s . C a p a c i t y i n t e r d e ~ c z d ~ n c e may a f f e c t t h e nake- buy c h o i c e £ r a p r o d u c t i f i:s P m a r g i n a l 2 r o d u c t i o n c o s t i s less tl-ia~. i t s iz-qort p r i c e w h i l e i t s i ; n p L r t r W i c e i s l e s s

. I

t h a n i t s n a r g i x a l p r c d u c t i c c c 3 s t p l u s a v e r a g e d i r e c t f i x e d c o s t s x i hou t s h n r i z g ; I I I - 1 :ci i s ail q p e r bo~!:d cn the .c. .kl of o u t p u c . S ~ c b a p r c d u c t would b opil:l:ndll;r i l 7~c . r t t ? i i

L

i - . . wi thouc s t i s r i n g , -:ut x i g h t 5e s r c i u c e d unde r s ! l z r ing . Scnewhat l e s s e:<tre-e ;s .b!:e c::se

r w

~f a = -,dxcT :;hic1; 5s Q c:? - --.... - . : d i e d ... ar,.d : L x ; 7 ~ t ~ e l :n ' the a5se::cc of s ? \ ; i r i n < ; ; . c y . ~ : i t::

Page 32: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- .- - I -!- - 1 J 3 + Ci - A sj-! xe I

L h*O 0 j d A , ~ 1 0 '

I

wSere 1 is :he s e t o f ? r o d u c c s opt:-ally p roduced w i t 5 o u t s h a r i n g , a n d p i s :?.e Ic;:e; :: I j

k u n d on t h e a l r g i n a l i o i c of t h e j ' i h p r c d x c t c o n p u t r e f r o n t h e :!arkinz; C C S C > l o i e i . I I - :Ye f i r s t :ompleta t e n above i s t h e t o t a l d i r e c t f i x e d c c s t t o p r c d y c e i t e n i c ~ . t e r

~ 0

capacit. . ; s h a r i n g ; i t L s t h e s u n of t h e f i x e d c o s t s u f t h e a d d i t r o n a l s h c p s requi ;eJ I

6' , r e c t l : ~ t o p r o d u c e i t e x i v i v e n ;he +:i.xed c o s t s t!lat a r e i n c u r r e ? m d e r t!le p a t t e r : C' " I

of p r a d u c t f o n w i t h o u t s h a r i c g . For $1 l u s i r a t i o n , w e have a s s u n e d t h j t 2iodi:c;s

o p t i m a l l : ~ ?reduced vichour : s h a r i n g a r e o p t i n a l l : ; p roduced a t t h e i r e - ~ e c t e d l e v e l s and 1 - I t h a t t h e p r o d u c t i n q u e s t i o n s h c u l d b e p roduced a t t h e e s p e c t e u l eve l , w i t h sharing.21, '

I -

I - - . - The secor.d t e n , i ~ . 1 -/ 13 t h e f 017llia above g i v e s t h e l i x e r bqxild il: tile :12rpAr,2_

c o s c of p r o d u s i n g t h e i ' t h duct. F u r t h e m o r e , :I?e e n t i r e f c m u ? a o - i t s i d i r e c t I L'lxed c f 3 s t s . For twc I n t e r - r e l a t e d r e a s c n s , tht.1, t h e forz!u la gLvc-s a 1or;er bouxd 0,:

I

p r c d u e t i i s o b t a i n e d . I n Xee?ing w i t % oar a p p r o a c h i n che ? r e v F o c s l s r c t - ' c n , ~ t . w i l l . C '* I - -:

:i~e t q a l c o s t of p r c d u c i n g i t e z i0 ~ ~ ~ d e r c a p a c i t : ~ s h a r i n g . I f t'ls

- 5 I

r e z s u r e t h e e f f e c t s of c a p a c i t y i n t c r 5 e z e n d e n c e b;: Lhe i i f f a r e n c e i - e t l e e r ur.it ~ ~ 7 7 1 ~ * r

bound i s d i - ~ l c e d

by t l ic velum of p r o d u c t i o n , , a Icxer >ound on t h e c n i t c c s t \ < i t 9 s h a r l n g c: I

Page 33: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

f o r ir is t h e cc s t r;LnlnFzi?.g u n i t s u p p l y c o s t w i t h o u t s h a r i n y . Furt'nel-i-.ere, eT.-er.

- ,;,ough .- ;:se or' i5.e l -ccr : ; r i ~ t ? . u n l e r s t a t e s t h e p r o d ~ ~ c t i c n c o s t s a v i n g s d u e t o ca?a:ic:.

Line 5 . Z . a . i . i n 7 a 3 l e 2 g i - ~ e s r h e u e t g n t e d a v e r a g e s u p p l y :os;

r e d u c t i o n ( i . e . i t s xpaer S e c n d ) d u e t o c a p e c i t y s h a r i n g o v e r t h o s C C I ? r o d x c t s t xhi:h s n s u ? d be produced u z d e r s k a r i z g , t h e w e i g h t s b e i n g p r o p o r t i d n a l t o the t o t a l

I ccst of i z ? ~ r ; i z g t h e i a p r o a u c t s i n a a o u n t s e q u a l t ? t h e i r e x p e c t e d o u t ? u t l e ~ e l s . F o r

I

e x a q i e , t k e e s t i - a t 2 cf 13.7 ? e r c e n t a p p e a r i n g u n d e r t h e c o l u n n f o r t h e b a s i : !

s h a r i ? . j , i t d c e s g i v e a? cF-,er ocur.d t o t h e p e r c e n t a g e s u p p l y c o s t

i n d i r e c t f i x e d c o s t s a r e taken i n t c a c c o u n t .

s p e c i f i : a t i o n s c z t e s (a? u?32r Sound on ) che p e r c e n t a g e r e d u c t i o n due t o c a p a c l t y

s h a r i r - g iz t h e a g g r e g z t e s c ~ p l y c o s t o f t h e two CCI p r o d u c t s t h a t o g h t t o Se I

r e d u c t i o n ;-F,e.?

p r o d u c e d ~ n d e r t h a t s p e r i f i : z = i o n . 2 5 / - Lir,? Z .2 .a . i : s t a t e s t h e r e d c t i c n i n a g g r e 3 z t e I siip?1;1 c o s t a s a p e r c e n t cf tots1 v a l u e added w i t h o u t s h a r i n ~ c v e r 11 t h o s e a c t i v i t i e s

I

producerl u n d e r s h a r i n g . ;his is t o i n d i c a t e t h e n a g n i t c d e of t h e c d s t r e d n c t i c n o \ f r I

t h e CCI ? r c d u c t s t h a t c u g h t t o be p roduced r e l a t i v e t o a s e c t o r - v i a a g g r e g a t e . ' ; h i i z

t h e a g g r e g a t e c o s t s a 7 ~ i 2 g d s e t o c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g i s c e r t a i n l y n o t r i v i a l i n r e l a t i 0 2

t o t h e a g g r e g a t e s u p p l y z o s t of t h e p r o d u c t s a f f e c t e d , i t i s r a t h e r t r i v i a l i n r~:zticn

t o a g g r e g n t e val1.e adds.', as i~ i s i e s s t h a n one t e n t h of a p e r c e n t E tl-e l ~ : t ? r . I.

L iL produced u n d e r si!arir,g z F t h a r c m p a r a b l e f i g u r e f o r C C i p r o d u c t s t h a 0ugF.r ?ct, ~ o Se

produced u n d e r . ; h a r i n g . i n t h i s c a s c , t h e dif :cr t lncc !- .e txeen i z y o r t p r i .c .in2 ::nit c c s c

i t i s of i n t c r e s t r o c c n p a r e t h e c o s t s a v i n g s f o r C C I p r o d u c t s

f o r a n i n d i v i d u z l p roduc ; i s r ! c ~ a t i v e . Chon e x p r e s s e d n s n p e r ~ q n t *i ri:e i r p o r t pi-5::c

t h n t o u g h t co 5e

Page 34: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

j e in:r2zs2d Sp a t i e z s t 43 .6 F e r c e n t -,.ere i t p r o d ~ c e d , Sut t n e a b s lir? ~ ~ , : ~ z s z i in c J i r ~s g r e a t e r Chin 3r e ~ c a l i C o n i y 0.01i p e r c e n t c f t o t a l v a ~ J e added.

. . , S i = i i l s r s s t i z a t e s a r e g i ~ f s n i n :>it t a b l e f o r all t h e s p e c i f i : s t i c n s . Ti? ;..ae:tic-,

*. . I r l g u r e 7 g i v e s t h e l i f f e r e n c e 5ezveen t h e ~ : i i : c o s t m l e r s h a r i n g a . d t h e <.-?:I: ?rice - .

s t a t e d a s a perc~: r i t ~f t h e l i i t t e r f a r e a c h cf t h e CC; p r o d u c t s x d e r E . B C ~ ~pe~ill:~'_<311: I

f o r cc i .venicnce , :: a l s o sho4.s :ils - i e i g h t e d 2ver;des. S e v e r a l c b s e r / v a t i o n s .xay be ::ad-

I , - . oil t :~e b a s i s of t h e s e d a t a . Cirst , w i t h r 2 s F e s t t o i n d i v i d ~ l l C C I p r o d u c t s which sr.cu-:

-h-,. 7h be 2rodu:ed unde r ~ h a r i n g , t h e c o s t s a - ~ i n g s d u e t o shart3g c ~ n :>e qdi:e l a r q e , ...L~, b

i t 2xhibLt.s s u b s t a n t i a l - f a r l a 3 l l i : y a c r o s s p r o d u c t s ; the r a n g e i s f r m 60.50 p e r c e n t k t o O . l l p e r c e n t of the p r o d u c t ' s i z p o r t rest ( s e e F i g u r e 7 ) . i l e i g h t d a v e r a g e s c v e r ail

Ehe C C I p r o d u c t s t h a t cug'nt t o be produced under a g i v e n s p e c i f i c a t i n e s h l ' s i t 2 l s s s a r

r a n g e , f r o n 2 4 . 7 n r r c e n t c f t h e f r o g g r c j a t t : i iyporr c a s : o n d c r il ic :crT

u ~ d e r ! i ? e c i f i , a ~ i o n S 3 . I n t u r n , r e l a t i v e t c

a g p r e g a t e c o s t s a v i r . g s i s q u i t 2 s p a l l , c;Lt!l a naslxun

. - . q u a r t e r 3f one ~e r : . . cn : u n d e r s p e . r i f ' , c a c i s n 5 1 , w l ? i c i ; ~ : ~ i u i : : e , s tr;c - 5 : . :tb.:ci . : ;;~rr:.-::-.ri. -, - I >

b C n e :;cuLd c:cn,ec:i the coi?seq>j-lp-nccz c f cap;;cic:: s h a r i n ~ cc: b e Cre t c r t h e ;L):dcr i~ r l : e i

- . r i e c t S ... --...-, ........ T - . I

I . .- I . ; ~ , . A ~ - .,A,, ........ _I___._._&__._ LC:.:. :::'I ' :,';::.c: _ .___

I . .

Page 35: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- - . - . ?rcd.;c=s. 213 i n t e r L e ? e n d ? n c * :r.z;y a r r e c t t!,e nake-buy c h o i c e f o r a p r o d u c t 2: zts

1 2rcdcc : ion c o s t a t d c r . e s t i 2 ~ r l c e s ( i . e . , v h r n exdogencus i n t e r z e d i a t e i x p u z s r r e

I , - ~ a i ~ e d a: z a r g i n a l ; o s t s ) i s Less c i ao i;s i l p o r t ? r i c e v h i i e i t s h r p o r c p r i c e i s

, I

I l e s s t h a n i t s p r o d n c t i o n ~ c s t 2: xcr ld p r i c e s ( i . e . , -ken j n t e r r . ed a t e i n p u t s zre v a l x e c I a t i;r.?cr: p r i c e s ) . ( S e e t h e d i s c . - l s s i on i n t h e ? r e c e d i n g s e c t i c n . ) h;?ether o r r .cr s u c h 2 I -

produc: s h c u l d b e ? r o t u c e d d e p 5 r . d ~ upcn w h e t h e r i t s i n t e ~ ~ e d i a t e i . p u t s a r e p roduced c r i n o t , a i d t o i n d i c a t e c h i s w e will c a l l i t a " c r i t i c a l l y TO i n t e r d e p e n d e n t " ( C I i ) prodcc:. I

I - I n ? u t - o u ~ ? u t i n t e r d e p e n 2 e n c e i s q u i t e d i s t i n c t f r o n c a p a c i t y i t e r d e p e n 2 e c c e . S o u e v e r P I

I t h e < :oad l t i ons d e f i n i n g a C I I p r o d u c t depend upon x h e t h e r t h e r e i s apac i :? s h a r i c g .

I I

Witt o u t ca?ac i t ; r s h a r i z g , p r o d u c t i o n c v s t n u s t i n c l u d e a v e r a g e d i r e d t f i x e d c c s t s , s i n c e I

I t h e c e c e s s a r y c o n d i t i o n f o r ?rocuc: ion i s t h a t u n i t p r o d u c t i o n c o s t d e f i n e d t o i n c l u c e I

1 . - a v e r a g e u i r e c t f i x e d c o s t s and LO - ~ a l u e i ~ t e m e d i a t e i n p u t s a t t h e i r n i n i r u n zarg;:a~

c o s t s 5, lsss tilar? t h e ? r o d u : t l s I x p o r t ? r i c e . V i t h c a p a c i t y s h a r i n , on t h e o t t e r hrr.?.

u n i t ? r c d t c c i o n c o s t x o u i d e x c l u d e a v e r a g e d i r e c t f i x e d c o s t s , s i n c e t h e c e c e s s a r y I I

\ c o n d i t i o n i a r ~ r o d u c t i o n i s s i z p i : ~ t h a t :he p ~ c d u ~ t ' ~ z a r g i n a l prcdu i !

i n t e r e l i o t a ip.pucs a r s v a l u e d ac t h e i r n i n i x u x n a r g i n n l c o s t s , Se

p;;ce T ~ Y S i t i s p o s s < b l e chnt a p r o d u c t ~ o u l d b e b o t h c r i t i c a l l y i x t e r 6 e ; c r c e r :

1 and c r l t i - s l i - I() i r . terdependei . : a t t h e s a n e ti;le u n d e r c a ~ a c i t y

c o n f u s i o r ; t i l Z t c : ; is n i g i l t c a u s e , i;e s i ~ n l l lefine CII n r c d u c t s

s h a r i n g c a s e . T h ~ s , u s i n g t n e s > ~ b , o l s de£ i r . ed p r c r i . o u s l y , a C I I p r c u c t i s o7.e k c r - ~ i ; i c h 0 t -.

:.:ci + f *. \ J i and 2 :(c: a- f . i i

- Tte e f f e c t s of iO i n t e r a e ; c n d e n c c a r e t e s t ~ c n s u r c c by d i e s a s i g s l a t ! ! ~ z i i t i

E . . maie-buy . r i t e r i p : ] r a t h e r t ' 1;: ; !:o;i a~ -.:arlc! p r i ; c o , 3.i . Ifr,?;.-, ;>:c<:,.::I:'..: '. A & i I

Page 36: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

i ' . b e c ~ ~ s e I n t e r a e d i a t e 5 - p u t s ar? -:alced a t t h e l r n i x i a u n z a r g i n a l c a t 5 a s i ~ ? , ~ ~ r ? ; ;= z : i

. . ::arginal Cc.cr: : I cde l , r a t h e r :?a2 t5eir n a r g i n a l c o s t s d e t e r x i r e 3 b) t h e :,at:e->uy ::.c;:zs

p r ~ ~ d ~ ~ t s i g h t o p t i z a l l : ~ be i z s c r t c d . Sowever , 211 C I I p r o d c c t s s h u l i be ~ r o c u c 2 d ~ 5 t h

s h b r i n g uxde r t h e p a r a z e t e r s p e c i f i c a t i o n s cons id t ! r rd ? e r e . T!le c s t sax7ir,gs d u e t o t k e

. . , rez-;zcc. i;l t h e s o l u z i o n w i t h s h i i r i n g . ;.s b e f o r e , :Je u i i l n o r ~ a l i 1 e t h e c o s t sa\">fs

r e c o g n i t i o n of I@ i n t e r d e p e n b e z c e a s a p e r c e r . t of imporc c o s t is s cb~m f o r I rc ; lv idua1

p r a d u i t s i n F i g u r e 8; t h e s t r i p e d S a r s g i v e t h e s a v i n s s w i t h ~ a t s h r i n g , wh;le t h e solil I b a r s g i v e t h e a d d i t i o n a l s a v i z g s Cue t o c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g . F o r s p e c i f i c a t i o n ,

e s t ; - a c e by d i v i d i n g i t by L=porc z o s t .

j e p e n d i n g upcn -;:.lich o f i:s I n t e r x e d i a t s i n p u t s a r e o p t i n a l l y

2 G / '.-+'e a r e he.re o f c o u r s e a s s c x n g t h a t t h e g r o d u c t o u g h t t o be p odnced - a t '1 l e l ~ e l e q u a l t o x?, -~hl:h i s i n f a c t c o r r e c t f o r a l l C T I ~ r o d u c ~ s o v e r a l l ~ ~ e c i f i c a t i o i i s .

.L r

i z p o r t e a , a !:TI

The f o r n u l a g i v e n I n t h e 2 r eced i r . g s u b- s e c t i o n i s u s e d t o c c c p u t e t h e t o t n ; c o s t cf p r r ? d ~ c . : i . c f i ' u ~ d e r s i ~ a r i n g f o r i r . ? i . j l d ~ i : CTI sum~a t ! . on o v e r i h e s e t I,, i n rc:;lpucing t h e a d d 2 . t i o n a l fi:$ec! ~ ! i c s e ; o f non-CTI p r c c ~ z t s c p t i m n l l y prcducet l t ; i t ? ~ o ~ ~ t s h a r i r . ? . p r e v i o u s f o o t c o r e t h a t t h i s z c t h o d o f comput ing t I ~ c t o t a l c o s : s l l a r i n ~ f o r i . 9 i v f d ~ a . l j r - u u c i s c o u l d l e n d : o p r o b l a - s i n i s e v e r a l p r o d u 5 t s of c!ieir i n d i v i d u a l t o t a l c o s t s sf p r ~ d u c t i z : : I n c o r r c ; :I.: , s51tri t h e aggri. l ;ztt? 2 2 c t a f producir . ; r t1:er.: t o g e t S e r . ; ? r i s e i n ::eve*; c a s e s :;her; r:?s CCT rind C I I p r o d u c t s : "e re e a c h case t ! : ~ %L:.; 0 5 t5'; ;';:?I.:ld::al c s t i z a t c s c;r.;i~:-~:::i-e? :!lu ' L , c ! " i ~ s ( ? , Z C n'"j:-p '-'.: - . - - - ' 8 - * . - . . . . .

" ,z - b . L . i S L ~ l ' . .

- , 3 , . ,- .- ,. ., + -, . < . .

.Af:t,...=bc..L :>.~::ber ,t. ;td'+' . :;:: z!l,;ps .,,:as c:.;;~:.:..~: :, ~ ,,: '~ .ZC>'X,: rL.3,

;> :-, ,- , u r n ; , - ,. A - , ---. . : ,.., -- -., . v : ~ : . : i ~ C Z . J S ~ . : ~ C L ;; L . .:::;at.?: f r - r . rJc5 ; , . : . .~. . .. ,~ - ,,.. . .L.er~c! si.i;zL': . . a ~ i a:: . , . :cr<n% i:: iYi,;ur.=s -, d ~ ~ i . . l r ~ s . . . . .. L:,t? ,. ;)cr..:er,:a~e .:s5t s;..-;l.r.. ::owc-;cr, t!iis 7;;-. ( - : .!.:;-.>>.i::.. ~ 1 . 2

. . < ? q i ; - , z 7 l s f t j r ~ : - a : : . J ~ ~ L ! s ; *:- . :: ' ..~+. - .,. . - d L L a i.~~sLsCei-,: : : ,P :C>YY.;L- : . - , . .

t h e lowet- 2cund cr. ~ r c c i u c - s b y ~ - e ; ~ l n < . l n g

c c s ' t s w i t i ; su;:-xit.i;.n r,-,:+; .. . . . ,\,e c.~,.;t;:--;cc -.. - .. -. .

of p r c C u c c i o n ~ ; . i e ; . . . . i ! a; r::e C J L L ~ ~ :LC> c7,:c

. . . S O ~ 3 1 ; ; 2 ~ : t c _ ' ~ :x:;;it . . .- ~ ? , . i s > . - : ) c ~ F F : -

. . ccns:ierc:l :c!:ct':~jjr: I:. . . . . - - E.

a:;:li .;,-:2: : :.: * . .. <: . . ,. ., . - . . 5 , . ' 7 i <,_ ' . . . . '-- . : ' - r J .1

*,.. ... .:;, . ~ . - , - . - . L t.:.:, ::

:-.:,. , , . . , . _ , ,.... - . ; . i . ,. % . \ . . - . . , . > . . . ---,>*.. . -. .- . . ,., . . , , u . <?.>; .- t:,.:. : . c ,..; - ,:, . ..., c . :. :::..I. . L . L L 4 - .. ,:il;:-. .. .

-{I::::.,<:::,-,<- r ? -., &. : *. . ,i:; - : ~ . : L " ~ ~ ~ y ~ : sL- :]?p,:r::s;i :;>c :*; --:: .:;,. ; j:c,.: ? z > < ; < \. 7- ;:-;~-:: ,; :;t:v :-; ~ : ! e tct:: : f 76 c::: 3r.e ('11 ;;r83du:: i-s e ~ ~ c : u l ~ ~ L 3 y ~ ~ . . I ; , . 7 .. ,. - i - % 1. ::-?e - .~ : , :., . si .i z .. .,,('. - cnl;; c:ir(:c ~ i - ~ . > p s x p y . 2 ~ y . ~ : ( ? ~ - : c : d .

Page 37: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

t h s e x r e c r e d o u t p u r l e v e l , is 2153 S ~ C L T i n F i g u r e 8 , a l o n g w i t h t h e cur:~er o f C I i

p r o d u c t s , a s x e l i a s i n p a r t F . l 3f T a b l e 2 . I n a d d i t i o n , p a r t ~ . j of t h e t a b l e g b e s

t h e a g g r e g a t e c o s t s a v i n g s d12e t o t 5 e r e c o g n i t i m of I0 i n t e r d e p e 2 o v e r a l l t;:e CI;

p r o d u c t s as a p e r c e n t of t o t a l v a l u e added . E s t i ~ a t e s a r e shown unds r no-

I S h a r l n g and n i t h s h a r i n g .

F a r i n d i v i d u a l p r c d u c t s , :he c o s t s a v i n g s due t o t h e r e c o g n i t i n o f I0 i n t e r d e > e n d e n c s

c a n b e q u i t e l a r g e i n r e l a t i c n :o :he c o s t of i n p o r t i n g , p a r t i c u l a r l y when t h e s a v i c s s due

t o c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g i s i n c l u d e ? . The h i g h e s t s a v i n g s a p p e a r s i n t h 1 c a s e of c o n c r e t e I

I (i - 6 9 ) u n d e r s p e c i f i c a t i o n F3. I n t u r n , even when c a p a c i t y s h a r i i n c o r p o r a t e d , t?.e

c o s t s v a i n g s c a n b e q u i t e s m a l l . The l o w e s t s a v i n g i s l e s s t h a n on ~ e r - e n t of i s p o r t

c o s t , f o r rocn a i r c o n d i t i o n e r s ( i = 95) unde r t h e bas!?

I-. n i x e r s (i = 7 4 ) u n d e r s p e c i f i c a t i o n S1 ( s e e F i g u r e 8 ) ; of t h e t o t a l

40 .3 p e r c e n t i s t h e a d d i t i o n a l s a v i n g s due t o c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g . I f

n e g l e c t e d , t h e n t n e h i g h e s t savLngs i s o n l y 13.5 p e r c e n t , i n t h e c a s e

s a v i n g of <O.S p e r c e n r ,

c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g is

of b a l l - i l l s

I w e i g h t e d a v e r a g e s o v e r a l l t h e C I I ? r o d u c t s f o r p a r t i c u l a r s p e c i f i c a t i o n s . I0 i n t e r -

The r a n g e of c o s t s a v i n g s e s t i n a t e s i s s u b s t a n t i a l l y reduced

I dependence r e s u l t s i n a c o s t s a v l c g of a t most r o u g h l y 9.0 p e r c e n t o t b e zggregace i z p c r t

when one l o o k s a t

I c o s t of t h e CII p r c d u c t s under t~:o s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , z e r o unde r one s? c i f i c a t i o n , and

be tween 2 .0 and 5 .0 p e r c e n t i n t h e o t h e r s . E q u a l l y i n t e r e s t i n g i s t c c n p a r e t h e we ighred . t P i

I a v e r a g e e s t i m a t e s w i t h and 1 ~ i : h c u t c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g : ia g e n e r a l , v e r j l i t t l e of t k e

a g g r e g a t e g a i n due t o r e c o g n i z i n g TO i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e can b e a t t r i b u t d to c a p a c i t y h a r t n g . i

- . .

.* I n r e l a t i o n t o t h e suppl;: ccs: of t h e pPoduc t s a f f e c t e d ; t h e sa i n g s due t o tile - -

. . r e c o g n i t i o n of c a p a c i t y i n t e r c e p e z d e z c e i s g w e r a l i ; ~ g r e a t e r than ti1 t s t e ~ ~ i n g frc: t::e v m

r e c o g n i c i c n of I 0 i n t e r d e p e n d e r . c r ((:s;nzsre li.r,e.s 5 . 2 . 2 ' . i z-.:;d F. 1 .!: .

, . , , A c e y s 3 ' ' :::<>rc -:- -.- . appea rs L O s u g g ' s ; tkl.at r a p ~ c i t : ::;:~rdc.;.c.r.dc:;~:~ r:incrz: l.: "-..- L . . . l.. L ; l < S '

I . . I . . . . . . . . ~ n t ~ r L i ' ; : ; ) ~ n c i e - i . 2z l;ya-::a; i:.. ...:-:.:. =ee7,.&3 tt7 > < z- .. .$..-. .-- .. ,- .-. .+ T. ? . - L ,.---!.; - c . . . ~ - . . ~ - . ~ ~ . . ~ -.3..Q I . : :... L . - - , ..<. .. '.. .,. , .-. - . . .

! . - ... - . ,

,.'"., <;:-< 3 b LL .- .. . -" "'.' . . . - :?cros? z i l ti;e s::eci"ic:ir.::s :' , . . k , . , i L . . -.? ... ~r is . . . . . -. . . - . . . .. . - .

Page 38: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

. < . -.-, - s": .. * " . - . >. -L*cc : .< - - .- - . . , . '.c:: 1.- dLL -A&... 3 : : . 2 7 . , ::r c:.:?..:; -c: , : 2 1 :!L:? L ? tr1:: c-.L:::- :.I - I..; ::.-.-- ' - ; d . t ' * L

..,-,..- - - v- . . - - . -,

;=:.: L . , c s,;;,pl.: -2s: J: I:.= ~ z L ' ? . * L L ~ ~ 3~ <:it :..i;:,:; L,;~: ; > ~ : ~ l ~ ~ : ~ ;:: L L L Z ~ ;,::-::' I

. . . . . . , - - . - , . h rer-g-.z:zz 1i.e ; . g a i n f - :::?i

A z 1 ;:: .,,, P C 0..L.-- - - -

I -.- *.-

. . - -., -;>-e ?:;CUT,~ sf za?ac?.:: L : ; :e rc i~ ;c~dscce v o u l d I r i c r ~ a a c t h e zu?:~l-: co.. .: I:;? .

7rcLcz:s t h a t cught To b e produced by (zt ~ G S L ? 0.OS9 ? e r c e n t of ~dcei. 1: i

t pro2u; i *.hose u n i t ; r r?d i lc t ian 53st z t d o ~ e s t i c p r i c e s i s o n l y s l i g h l ly 3e lo r . its L F ~ ~ G ~ T

g e z e r z l , t h e n , I0 i z t e r d e p e n d e x e is of g r a t e r c o n s e q u e c c e :hat is

d e p e n l e z c e .

p r i z e S x t f e z v h i c h t h e a b s o l c t e c s s t s a v i n g s r e a l i z e d t h r o u g h done t i c p r o c n c t i c g i s 1

c z ? ~ c l : y inter-

L :;er:~ l a r g e due t o t h e 'nigh v ~ L u r ? e of de3and. C a p a c i t y i n t e r d e p e n d s c e , c n c:~e c i i e r h a n i .

I - s ~ t - c u t p u t iccerde?er .den;e o f z e n c r i t i c a l i y a f f 2 c t s t h e make buy choize cf z 1

I g e x e r a i l g a f f e c t s ~ a X s - b u y c::oices f o r p r o d u c t s h a v i n q vclcr:> of ie-aria,

vhLch i n ; l i e s a s n a l l absolute c o s t s a v i n g s b e t x e e n u n i t I

p r o d u c t i o n c o s t and i a p o r t p r i c e .

A S e n s i t i v i t - r A n a l y s i s of - -. ,?E e s t i n a t e s d e v e l o 7 e d and b r i e f l y s u x ~ a r i z e d i c t h e tTh70 p r c c d i n g s u b - s e c t i s n s I can b e u s e d t o i n q u i r e f u r t 5 e r i x t o t h e d e t e r m i n a n t s of t h e c c n z e n u . n c e r ; of in t~~rd- . ; - . : :L~:- .~ . .

ZJ:, b e f o r e t , r n i n g t o a n e x ~ z i n a t j o r . of t h e e f f e c t s of p a r a z e c e r :l.arlges or! t?,e cob:

C I ' . e . - , 5':vings d::e t o t h e r e c z J g a i t : ~ n l ~ f e i t h e r o r b o t h iypes of i .~erle;?r : . .dsncc, ,;e . : :::

I

1 t u ccn,dllct . ,. a n a l y s i t h e cezsurc o i

. . . depcrrdence Ce7,,p! oped ; ~ r e v i c i : - :;. . ::ul:!i o f what cirri je 1c;lrncd deriv;fs f yc ; , ,:.-,a .,-.- -.- . . . . . . A . a , . i :; i 5

Page 39: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

2nd ic ~ ~ 1 1 d e c l i n e as t k z -,+-age r a z e c r tF.2 i n t e r e s : r a t e r i s e s . Indeed , excepc f o r :he

~ f f e c r s f del-,and, t h i s c a n be s e e n 3:: canpar ing the n a r g i n a l c c s t mqasur2 of I0 i n t d r -

dependence a c r o s s s p e c i f i c a t i m s . The t a b l e below ~ o k e s t h i s conpad i son i n t e n s of

s i z p l e a v e r a g e s over che 120 ~ r 3 l u c : i o n a c t i v i t i e s '

Y a r g i n a l C c s t Xeasure of I 0 I n t e r d s p e n d e n c e I ( u n i t s = p e r c e n t )

Exchange ?.ate V a r i a t i o n - F3 Average 7.53 S t a n d a r d D e v i a t i c n 8.15

Wage R a t e V h r i a t i c n Average L tandard D e v i a t i o n

B a s i c 5.16

I n t e r e s : R a t e V a r i a t i c n K 1 Average 5 3 4 S t a n d a r d D e v i a t i o n 5 .88

Lie 32); z g a i n u s e t h e t - s t a t i s t i c t o e v a l u a t e t h e s i g n i f i c a n c e of t h e ,ean d i f f e r e n c e s I

by n change i n t h e f o r e i g n exchange r a t e ; the r e sponse i s somewhat l e s s i g n i f i c s n t t s a

change ir. t he wage r a t e , and i c i s l e a s t t o a change i n t h e i n t e r e s t

between p a i r s . The t - s t a c i s : i c h e m e e n t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n s i n the exchange

is 7 . 5 9 ; i n the ~ 2 g e r a t e variation, 5 .79 ; and, i n t h e i n t e r e s t r a t e

f i r s t two of t h e s e a r e h i g h l y significant, u h i l e t h e l a t t e r i s s i g n i f i c a n t

I f o r a o n e- t a i l e d t e s t . Thus t h e d e g r e e o f i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e i s most

I t is no t s u r p r i s i n g t h a t a change i n t h e f

! impac t , f o r i t produces a d i r e r : a n d p r c p o r t i o n a I I

r a t e v a r i a t i o n

- ~ a r i z t i o n , 1.38. The

a t t h e .10 l e v e l

s i ~ n i f t c a n t l y a f f e c t e d

i of i n t e r i r e d i a t e i n p u t c c s t s v n l c e c a t wor ld p r i c e s . I n t u r n , an e x p l a n a t i o n of t h e

found i n t h e cornposi t ion of ::argir.ol c s s : dorestii p r t c e s . c>n ; Iver- igcy :abcr ) s ~ . I I I , difference i n t h e z a g n i t u d e o f E?!P respor.se t o c h n i i g e s i n t h e wage 2nd 1 - i n ~ e r c s t r z t c s I s

Page 40: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

? - x r - ~ e r - ~ -52 e z r i = c t s ,I ; s r r ; r d = c r c: : ;c2.>s - 2 ; th7 .22 Le.t...-- r -. .

- - - a -:-F::.< 5 : - ::.:;: t.i:12 c. -<?. , : .-

, . -.. .- ~ - ' ,;;..:!.?I- :!le _:?A,.- .~~;: c:;~:~:= f o r 2 ;a::;~.=,.:1:: - , . rcn , ;z i i.,;

1. . - i:?:erdz?er.L2n:es i n e rake-b:,::; c h o i c e f-?r a ?;TC::XLJ:-

. . fc;r c:sti:ct ?>.bses 2s 6 p a r t l : z ? z r ?e raxe te r is ;a i:--

a r o d c c E i c c ~ c ~ s t s ' r e l a t i v e t o i a 2 o r t p r i c e s : i n c:-.e

<"ice i s ~ c t z r i t i c a l l y a f f 2 c t e d by

- - . - secozd and t h i r d p h a s e s , t h e - , roCucc ' s rilke-bc:= c h o i c e i s e z z e c c ~ s 2:; i:..,

d e p e n d e x e a c d i t s h o u l d 5 e i s ~ o r t l e d I n :he s e z c ; ~ d and t:-.ird; i n t?,.~

f o u r t h p h a s e , ;he p r c d u c t ' s x k e - b u g c h o i c e i s agc?in n o t c r i i c a i l ; , a f f e c t ~ 6 'zv i - - - j - . . L C

l e p e n d e n c e , b u t i t s h c u l c b e p roduced . I -. ~ n e se-cnd q u e s t i o n h a s t o do w i t h t h e c o n s e ? u e c c e s of ? I n t e r d a p 2 r . d e r r i re;-

I

t o a s i n g l e p r o d u c t which i s c r i t i c a l l y a f f e c t e d by in t e rde5c r .dence a n 2 s r .gh t E D 52 I produced . S i n c e t h e consequences of i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e s r e nea u r e d by he d i f f e r , n c z

be tween p r c d u c t i o n c o s t and i m p o r t p r i c e , t h e y w i l l va,? w i t p a r a n e t e r changes i n t:

sarie d i r e c t i o n a s d c z s t h e a e a s u r e of I0 I n t e r d e p e n d e n c e . F r r h e n o r e , c h i s i s r r u ~ Ij whe::ter one i s s p e c i f i c a l l y conce rned v i t h t h e consequer .ces cf I0 i n t c r d e ~ e ~ . 2 e n c e OL-

o f c a ? > i c i t y i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e . Wi:h r e g a r d t o a s l n g l e p r c d w c t , a r i s e i- t':e ;:cc?sn$

r a t e zakes. i t n o r e c c s t l y t o n e g l e c t i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e ~ h l : ~ - z n i n c r e a s e ir. * ~ c : : e r r k e

r4 t t . , or =he i n t e r e s t r a t e nakeg i t l e s s c o s t l y . ';:len a! i o t h e r ; ~ r o d u ~ t s ' i ' ~ t ; ) x t L.zv

a re t:nchnnqed, t h e c c n s c q t ~ e n c c s of e i t ! l e r t y p e of i n t e r d c ? e n d o n c e genera;?:: : n c r c , . s e

a r i s e i r ? ie::nnd f o r the p r c d c c r s i n c e r?verage Air&?(.!: '%xed c o s t s n , enpra ' i : : , i l l A;;

P .

I i n c r e a s e i:, : . ! I ii ti; t:e : ~ e t til:cugh i l c i i s z i : pr52e::.io;t 1

I

Page 41: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

c o n s e q u e 3 c e s of i n t e r d e ~ e n d e n c z v:r:: n o n o t ~ n i c a l l y w i t h changes i n a p a r t i c u l a r ?araF.e=er,

b e i n g i r , c r e a s e d vhex t h e pars l r .e te r change r e s u i t s i n a r e d u c t i o n of d o n e s t i c ?reduction

c o s t s r e l a t i v z t o i n p o r t p r i c e s and reduced i n t h e o ? ? o s i t e Ho;~ever , tilis r.eecj

n o t b e t h e c a s e b e c h u s e p a r a s c t e r changes a l s o i n f l u e n c e u c t s a r e c r i t i c a l i v

a f f e c t e d b y i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e . I n a d d i t i o n , by a f f e c t i n g t h e compos t i o n a n d / o r c a p a c i t y 't e c t i l i z a t i o r , of t h e s e t of p r o d u c t s ::hich s h o u l d be p roduced i r r e s p c t i v e of i n t e r -

d e p e n d e n c i a s , p a r a n e t e r changes a l s o a f f e c t t h e magn i tude o f t h e g i n s due t o c a p a c i t y

s h a r i n g . Thus t h e s e c t o r- w i d e consequences of i n t e r d e p e n d e n r ? n z e

a o n o t ~ r ~ i c a l l y t o p a r t i c u l a r p a r a m e t e r changes . And t h i s i s t r u e w e t h e r t h e s e 4 c o c s e q c e n c e s are a e a s u r e d i n a b s o l u t e terms o r r e l a t i v e t o t h e s u p l y c c ; t of t h e

c r i t i c a l l y a f f e c t e d p r o d u c t s t h a t s h o u l d b e produced o r t o t o t a l v

The r e s p o n s e o f t h e consequences of i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e t o c h a n g e s i n s e c t o r- w i d e

demand p r o v i d e s t h e c l e a r e s c examples t o i l l u s t r a t e t h e f o r e g o i n g a a l y c i s . D i e s e l b e n g i n e s of 200 t o 500 horsepower ( i - 51) a r e c r i t i c a l l y I0 i n t e r d e e n d e n t unde r t h e S l , b b a s i c , a n d 5 3 s p e c i f i c a t i o n s ; i n c l u d i n g t h e a d d i t i o n a l s a v i n g s due t c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g ,

t h e c o s t s a v i n g s due t o p r o d u c i n g t h e s e d i e s e l e n g i n e s i s 3 . 4 4 , 3 . 6 , and 3.S0 p e r c e n t

of t h e i r i m p o r t c o s t unde r each of t h e s p e c i f i c a t i o n s r e s p e c t i v e l y s e e F i g u r e 9 ) . These k e s t i m a t e s i l l u s t r a t e t h e monotonic i n c r e a s e i n t h e consequences of n terdepender lce a t

t h e l e v e l of a s i n g l e p r o d u c t a s domes t i c p r o d u c t i o n c o s t f a l l s r e 1 t i v e t o t h e c o s t of

i m p o r t s ; :?is i s :he p r c l c t i c a l l y un,exceptiona! r e s p o n s e w i t h , r e spec t o e i t h e r t y p e I o f i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e where c * ~ r d a t a p e n n i t compar i sons a c r o s s s p e c i f i a t i o n s , r e g a r d l e s s 4 of t h e ; a r t i c u l a r p 3 g a n c t e r ttlar: is v a r i e d . An e x c e p t i o n (one of o r l y two t h r o u g h o u t

-* t h e s p e c i f i c a t i o n s ) ? s p r o v i d e d by b a l l mi l ls (i = 69) which a r e c r ' t i c a l l y c a p a c i t g - - - i n t e r d e p e n d e n t u n d e r x h e S 1 and b a s i c s p e c i f i c n e i o n s and c r i t i c a l l y I0 i n t e r d e p r n b ~ n t I .

I

u n d e r t h e S 3 s p e c i f i c ; l t i o r i . The c o s t s a v i n g s ice t o ?reducing ball -:ills i s 3 . 5 0 , !G.i5,

. +

I S:c and i 5 . 1 3 p c r c e i ~ e zf i z p o r t c c c t L ~ I , C ~ C T t d i i i CI t ! ;cse s ? c c ~ f i i ~ L > c ~ ; ~ Iro~;xc~c:l..3c::7 '

. . . F i g u r p s 1 and S), s o ':h,.it ~ i ~ o ;;cns.cjue;:c:is 0 5 . < r : : . ~ y ~ p ? e ~ ; d ~ ~ : i i . in

r a t h e r :L>,:r r i s e v+-i;pr, +!.n -n.>-~.,--, , .

L.,,L , . .L . . . i J . , : ~ :x c ~ ~ ~ . y ~ ! : ;~ey : ! .~ : : : . c . c : :s <:,>G:!:L.~

I .-. 7

I l ! le cai!sfd i:; 2. f i , l L , ; 2 , ; ) :tie :.;>?.a? ' . .

.-?h-,.(7 rz:!, .:I-):- ,::..*>;;<:5.Ly :::;Lir::;z.

Page 42: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

I . . . I . - ,- CiL ;rzducts, t h e n v - ~ k e r o f v i c h :>sn-~s ~;C!ll-~inotC!.7.;.;cJi~-: '.;It? l::.re&sc:? '- .- . - ' - - - . - . . .- - . . . , . -. ~ . , . , r - - -> , .rLL a r ? 2 CIL ? r c c u c : ~ unde r ~ p e c i f l c a t i o r ~ S i , 4 ~ r 2 e r r'::e j a s f - ~ r , e c ; i : c ~ : i ~ ~ , . L - - . - - .

3 =ricer s ; : e c i f i c a z i ? n S 3 ( see F i g c r e 3 ) . X o n e t h e l e s s , o n l t t i n g ..2 a c l i t i c n a l 2iF.1 ;::Y lL - -Gpa:ity shar- ,ng, t:;e lcss t h a t would be i n ~ a r r e d L-re zhsse p r o k c c t l ~ . p . ; r ~ ; d Escs

i n c r e a s e 1 ~ i t ; l ds;r.arid: i n r c i 2 t i o ; i EC t h e i r aggrega te i!;pcrt c o s t 4 t k e Loss is 3 .1 , 3 . 5 .

3 . 9 percent r e s ? e c t i - ~ e l y under t h e S 1 , b a s i c , znd 5 3 s p e c i f i c a ~ i n s ; ;n r 2 i a t i c n :(: i a g g r e p i t e v a l u e a l l e c , t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g fLgures a r e . 6 7 i , .732 , arc2 ,821 p e r c c n t

r e s p a c t i v e l : ? . (These and t h e e s E i c a ~ e s g i v e n below a r e taken fr x T a b l e 2 , ) ? o . i ~ v e r , r i f tiye a d d i t i o n a l g a i n f r o n c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g i s i n c l y ~ c e d , :he? t t ; c - l o s s c h a n g s s nor.- 1 a u n o t c n i c n l l y ? ~ i t S i n c r e a s e s i n denand : i n r e l a t i o n t o t h e i r agg egdLe i ~ p o r ~ c c s t ,

t h e t o t a l 135s i s 3 . ? , 3 . 6 , and 4 . 1 p e r c e n t r e s p e c t i v e l y ; i~ r e 1 t i o n t o t o t a l v a l u e i a d d e d , t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g f i g u r e s a r e 0 . 7 7 5 , 0.756,and 0.860 p e r c d n t .

l Tur2 ing t o t h e C C I p r o d u c t s , we fLnd t h a t t h e i n p a c t of d e a nd c h a n g e s on t h e s e : t c i

wide consequences of c a p a c i t y interdependence i s just :he o p p o s i i e of t h a t on ti:c s r c :u r .

v i d e c o n s e q u e n c e s of I C i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e . Tliat i s , An i n c r e a s e i{ d r z a r d r a a - . - ~ - -ic3 th.2 :CS

i n c u r r e d by i ~ y s r t i z ; ; Chc CCI p r o d u c t s which o u g h t te be produced i s 1 7 . 7 , !3.7: a x - - z e r 3 p e r c c n : r e s 2 e c t i v e l y of ::?cse ; r o d u c t d zggrcE;a tc inpcrr c o s ~ c u:;Jor t?:e C : , '3;151c,

L I I

a:ld S 3 S F e c i f i c s t i o n s ; t h e c o r r e s p c z c i i n g f @ u r e s i x r e l a t i z n :C ~13:21 v . i lx t : aci-eci :i::i.

e I 13. 265, 0 , 0 8 9 , end z e r o ?er r i . : i t r e , ~ ~ e c t i - ~ e ? l ; . T1-e r?;?.;~:: f 3 r ii,e i:: T L C ~ . : . I C ~

as 5e t-zecr: ri:t s e t :,-.r-.~ii.e ~ , . ; S ? ~ U E T . C ~ : ~ ', r.ap.lc<try I:.- : - . : 1,- z C . . 7. 5 : ; . ..: :- . . I

is f.n:lj ::: : : , , . $ 2 &:.:i<l! ye=:: : , ' : i 1:. ;/:::. . - . . . ' . . " C -'... ' ' ~ . . . . . L ~ ? : 3 -

Page 43: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- -.2 -

t h a t t he sectsr-vi ide cocse:Lences of i r i t e rdspen lence need no t vary u n i i o r x i i y l.,~iti-~

changes i n the k e y ?arazc.:ers, :..l?ereas :he cor~sequences f o r s i n g l e ?ro<uc ts geze r z l l - r I

d o . We cou-J g s cn t o f u r c k e r i l l g s r r a t e t h i s p o i x t wi th r e s p & c t t o v a r i a t i o n s iz I

the o t h e r p a r a e t a r s . Esz2ver, .<e s h a l l l e a v e t h i s f o r t h e r e i d e r t o pursue if s o I

Page 44: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

. . ? . I -L-2,: ?,.*.:..< ? = .,.- she-*-: c i . ~ t ~ ig : :~ : : z~r . c ec,~r.c,zL,is , f :::;+ z r - ;j-esc:.~ :.-: z>e z r > : : l - r 2 _..L _ . _ _ __._ . - -

. . - - . . l o d e l e d z rd t h a t t h e r e i s 2 acre . , :s;: G: p;.ti .nrla: in:eric.?ez<?r.c:?

who le . On t h e o t > . e r hanr',, Scc t io r .

F i r s t , t h e n u z b e r 05 p r o d u c t s a i f s c t e l i iy i a r e r d e p e r d o n c e i s d a i e r p ' l l ? : l i re 5:rall ~3:;:: ;

- i. :o :he n u a b e r of p r ~ d x c : s :h2: s a t i s f y t 5 e z e c e s s a r y c o n d i c i o z 13r r c i u e t i o z . 5ac~:.c,

t i e 20s t 3f n e g l e c t i n g i n t e r d e p e n l e n c e , w h i l e s o e e t i z e s su5s t a x i l a l , --, :- Zei-s n f t h e

? r o d u c t ' s orm s u p p l y c o s t , i s g e r e r a l y v e r y s~.:.ali r e l a t i v e :o t ~ t z l adddd L ~ - : T ' - -..-.. zkr:

s e c c o r . I n no c a s e v o u l d t h e c o n ? l e t e n e g l e c t or' i n t e r i e p e n d e z c e c h c o s i n ~ b e t ~ e ~ r ,

p r ~ d u c t i o n and i n p o r z s i n c r e a s e s e c t o r - : ~ % d e t o t 2 1 s u p p i y c o s t b:; e :ban 3 .0 ;erz:rt s:

t o t a l v a l u e added . Tc! p l a c e t h i s e s t i r : a t e i n p e r s p e c t i v e , L t -. ; : e a l :,-;thix :'st. rar.c,e of :- t

e m p i r i c a l e s c l n a t e s f o r t h e e f i i c i e x c y l o s s Ooa t o t h e c!e~-i:ore frbn P z i 2 t e c p t i z n l l r .

:a!? be c r a c e d t o t z r i f f s , t a x e s , xonopo iy , and tk.e l i l i ? ix t h e sbs? ce of ec2r.-- 'es cf 2 2 2 t. . - ,,e a r e t h u s l e d t o c o n c l u d e t h a t rhe i n t e r d e p e x d e x e co v h i c h i e s of s c a l e g l v e r i s e

d c e s n ' t "nat:er: ' v e r y much.

O f c o u r s e , a c o n c l u s i o n drak-n f r cm the e s t i a a t e s p r e s e n t e d i n e c c i c n liI r . uc t Se

: e n t a t i - ~ e , and i s b e s t r e g a r d e d a s a n h y p o t h e s i s s u b j e c t t o f u r c h e r ies: i : i~ r,r.r', rcf::.ez.ent

w i t 5 c t h e r , n i a i l a r S o d i e s o f p r a d u c t i c n i n f o r x a t i o n zsr c z h e r coun r L e s 2nd scc tc rs .

. , . -.:e ?;;i;-c VC\,.<EL :.:- :' T h e r e a r e s e . ~ e r a l r e a s c c s f o r c h i s . F i r s t , t h e " ~ 2 ~ 3 l e s i ze"

o n l y one s e t of u s d e r l y i n g p r ~ d a c t i , c n d a t a and x i t n %?n',y r ~ i - c se t ; f ;;ra;r.cte

. I . . s p e c i f i c a t i c n s . Second, a l l o w a n c e n u s t be n a d c f o r ;cssiL:c errors o f 2 5 k n ~ ~ ~ n c ~ r ~ ~ p ; -,cn

- - . _ .I 29,' C : l r sc~j:;t:.or. ;.ro:edcre - . - . - . , . . , , . - , . , .. .. . - .

- I n e r r e :: lez,.is .JS !I(: 2.c : . L . _ ... . . . . . . . .. .: . < . L & . :..-., . . 1 .

!:.:fr.r,:i:r_r?decrc. .-,-r~..b,ez,zr~.. . c h p fz i ; :yyc :- :;.& ;ri ,I..;;..a.,- ,..-I t c I : - . . . . .-.. . - i;: '.:: r:. - ..--:-:.:: . . . - . > f - ; -. ,

1 ; L 5 . = . [ ! : - , - . - : - : Y . . .-..: <- .- ' . -- .. . . ' . ?, . . -. ,- 0 7- . . - ,. . ..L -,. ;.f SCT -;.r-,c!:~ct:s .-.::2 : , i q ; r :a tc:l :r.c .?; t L . %.. . . .

Page 45: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

a r e c o n s i s t e n t v i t h t h e n e z r l y u r . i ve r sa1 f i r -d i n g t 5 a t t h e s u r f a c e of t h e c b j e c t i v e fxcctls

i n a n i n c r e a s i n g r e t u r n s ~ o d e l i s c u i t ~ f l a r o v e r a r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e n e i g h j o r h c o 5 of E ~ S

g l o b a l o p t i x u r ~ . z/ F i n a l l y , t h e x c d e l o x i t s s e v e r a l f e a t u r e s whiqh have been ky;oc>.ssiz:.~ I

t o i n c r e a s e t h e consequences of i ~ c e r d e p e n d s n c e : =/ t h e model i s s t a t i c r a t h e r t h a n I d y n z i c ; i t n e g l e c t s s p a t i a l allocation and t r a n s p o r t c o s t s ; and , irt does n o t incor?ora:e

I -

There a p p e a r s t o be a q u i t e s ic rp le e x p l a n a t i o n f o r o u r which we F;elLZv= -

s u b s t i t u t i o n ariong p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s , e i t h e r i n t h e p r o d u c t i o n

o r chrough r e s o u r c e b u d g e t c o n s t r a i n t s .

n a k e s i t n o r e p l a u s i b l e . The consequences of i n t e r d e p e a d e n c e a r e a f u n c t i o n of t h e n c x t e r

of i n d i v i d u a l p r o d u c t s

of c r i t i c a l l y i n t e r d e ~ e n d e n t p r o d u c t s and , f o r e a c h cf t h e s e t h a t o g h t t o 11e ?reduced, t k ~ C c o s t s a v i n g s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h rhe r e c o g n i t i o n of i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e . ~ { e s e c t o r - v i d e

I

consequences of i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e i n t h e Korea4 model a r e i n i n i a a l l a r e l y because 0:: t h t 4 m a l l nunber of c r i t i c a l l y i n t e r d e p e n d e n t p r o d u c t s . R e c a l l t h a t a r o d u c t i s cr2t l :al l : : 4 i n t e r d e p e n d e n t i f i t s i m p o r t p r i c e l i e s be tween i t s a v e r i g d p roduc tdon c o s t a t wor ld p r i c e 3

Wi > c On 2 p r i o r ; and i t s z i n i n u n m a r g i n a l p r o d u c t i o n c o s t , i . e . i f >ICY + f i - - g r o u n d s , t h e r e i s no more r e a s o n t o e x p e c t a l a r g e nunber of s u c h p r d u c t s w i t h i n a s e c t o r b t h a n t h e r e i s t o e x p e c t a s m a i l number; i f a n y t h i n g , a m a l l nunber o u l d g e n e r a l l y be

expected. F i g u r e 9 g i v e s . t h e cumula t i \ re f r equency d i s t r i b u t i o n of t e r a t i o s of average?

p r o d u c r i o n c o s t a t t h e e x p e c t e d o u t p u ~ l e v e l s t o i n p o r t p r i c e ( i . e . , Ci/K.) i n t h e b a s i c ? s p e c i f i c a t i o n of t h e Korean model. The d i s t r i b u t i o n of a v e r a g e prod c t i o n c o s t t o i n p o r t ,

. I

p r i c e r a t i o s i s w i d e l y d i s p e r s e d ; 98 p r o d u c t s have r a t i o s between .1 and 1 .70, rci t ! l a r r o u g h l y u n i f o r m d i s t r i b u t i o n o v e r t h i s i c t e r v a l . Hore t o t h e p o i n t , o n l y a r e l a t i - ~ e i y f~7:; - 'I - - p r o d u c t s have r a t i o s c l o s e t o i . 0 , and t h e s e a r e t h e p r o d u c t s ~ o s t b e crl:;:s--:: -

i n t e r k p e n d e n t . G/ The e?c;rlanation is tb.us fcund i n t h e v i d e I

30/ S e e , f o r exampie , :!snne : 1 9 6 7 ) , p . i 5 f f . and :;ss:~i~al - ? l / See :!anne ( 1 9 7 3 ) and :.;es:?!?ai ( i 5 7 5 ) .

I I -- I

. . 32,' A t :his point; i t i s rele\;an'; to r ,cte : i 1 - ; ~ ::'Ji\_ : . : cZ? C ' G ~ C ~ G : ~ . ; - : c Y - - . . . t h e i 2 0 p rcduc ts . T h e !~;:..est c:>rrsizt lcr , is :cur,d .:;C; : :;.;c. :s::..: ::. 2

c o r r e i a t i o n i s i 9 3 6 , while t h e raak c o r r e l a t i c n i s . 9 7 2 .

Page 46: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

.- -< , - -..c7 - . .. ,- . , - ,. ;-,, . ,_ ,:ect - a p ? r a i s e l cri tert-7. f c r ~ r c d c c 1 5 3 1 states t h a t a ? r o c : ,:c c!:z::::. . - - \ - . - : -

-

. I - ., - c s 2: ; ;or lc ~ r i c c s der i - jes f r r , tr,e 7 c r f e c t l y c z ~ y e r i : ' c . ~ . - -2:e wl::n :;o:.-Lx:-e~z:n:

rs:;rns to s c a l p zr.2 f r e e inter ; ls :Far .al t r z d e . L'zi'er t h i s :;rd&, - ~ - ~ o i l i ~ t , - ~ L-.~,:;. ..- - tntc-.- - - -

- . . s 3: :*.s Le:.ci,-pz.t:n: 7 . : ; * r % 3 - . . a o r . T h e r e is a x p l c . . . . . ,. . . . ,

, . - - . zc: ::.ec::ar.~ca- ,~2gi :< :e r ing ? . r s d l ~ c t s a cour1cr;l ~ u s " ~ s ; r s t

J ,- ,. ' . . . . -A,, iL<,L:;.); :-52 : l : f i + , , i S t ~ : ~ y , : , i g : < : - ! - : l j . 2 P".?

- . 3 - ; 1 - . , , - 7 . ~ --<.A ....- ,-.- iin ~ c ~ c i u ; r . : ~ - ::;isc? .:5 ..- . . - - -. , . . I ,. - , -5 -,??or r s r i c y C 0 5 i o l i t i ~ p l l ~ 5 i ! 1 ~ 5 S?.CU?I 9 ~ t 5.2 ~ a l y j x 2.5 2 <.:-.:::- ?:,

C . r

I T o c r g i : ! u < z i : \:?.,i;e i::cy:l:;.ci;dcnce da($ t-2 r+.-<-r. . - -

. I

3 , -- ,- ..u,.:l.c.s (.I +,(.a,~? ~:t.::s L C ~ : ; : , ~ L : C Y 5:- I - . .-

Page 47: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 48: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 49: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 50: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 51: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 52: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

Coat Saving Resulting from Capacity Sharing

Cumulal~ve

Fpmuencv: Number ol Process Elements

0 20 4 0 60 80 (00 ' Percenregd at C o y Seved under C a ~ d f % t y S h s r ~ n q

I

I World bnk-9912

1

.-

Page 53: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 54: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

T o d Cmt S r r i n ~ k 1rnpa-t C a t for Gibdlv to I n a d . p r d . R t Roductr

Page 55: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 56: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 57: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

?. k n l u - & r r c Lrw.1 L* 7 ~ ' 0 . 3 d + >. r . ~ h . ~ ~ . 1 . c . (von per U.I. dal :*r ) ~------I50----$ $50 300 4 3, I rmrrb . b u r l , Gag. b e (wnn) t 15; > I , . ~.t.r..r r.cr c p . r = . o c ) L I e--- 20

K* + - >O ----------4 215 3 73 t i ?5 ------t

1 3 >D

I - I ' . I. g 4 . r o f r r o d u c t l o n A c r l r l t l ~ ' :

1. Ior w i ~ i c h rC 5 2 ' Y 58 >S 5 1 , 72 ( 6 1 2, l a cb* S o l u r i o n r i C l w t S l a r l r B :

2 1 6 9 I. rrodurrd r r ? r % L = u D ~ t p u t Ltrrl >9 6 0 & 9 66 62 6 9 6 1 5 2 b. Impor ted . o r l o p o r t e d r s d Produc.6 I I I

I, troduc-4 v l t h S h r i n g . . 61 61 57 6 7 & 6 5 3 5 3

:. * o c a ~ v. ~ u c ~ ~ 8 . 4 <-!l!ion ran$' - . I . ~ l c b v l Shoring 81516.7 1 6 S . 7 9?215.1 42517.6 9 0 . I . 71117.6 1 9;112.'1 1. w i t h Sharing W731.8 1b017t.: - 5 . e 3 ; c i . r 606oL.7 7 . 101-I:.$ 76175.1 i E;i;6.:

>. roinc Lrl lz - l r . a 1 C t c t o r - v { d e V a l r a Led14 S c a l e : I r a : l r l r *

1. F l t h o ~ r S h r l n g 0.661 0 . ~ 6 1 5 .115 0 . 7 0.802 1.872 3 . 6 7 1 I O.E:5 1 0.5% 2. Y l t h S h r l r g 0 . W 0.905 C . j i 3 ' 0.891 O.SL3 , 1.901 0 ' 0.WZ . ( 1 . 8 3 j

. Cosr Zavl: ,rr d u e . .I.pbtltv S ? a L n $

1. D l a r r r d u c t s ? r a d . ~ ~ t J ~ 1 t . L S : Y ~ ~ ~ : ' a . Saving. i n F ixed Cost /p . r r tnc l . lL.B ' 20.1 ' 12.L 16.6 22.9 :&.I lL.7 27.C 11.2 b, Savlnsa i n ' l * ! c . ~C2.d r:mrr.nc) .. 3.1 1.L 3.8 4.1 1.1 3.2 1 . 2

2 . W e r F r o d u c : ~ tk.nr a r e C r l t ~ r . 1 : ~ C a p a c i t y :?rr:!c:e:t.?t a. Shauld t. 7roddc.d r i r l l i t a r l c ~ : i o l a l CaaI i r v ~ = ( s

I . Ar r*rren: of t ~ 3 I : ? ~ r c ' < o s ~ L , 13.7 0.0 1 5 . 1 . 26.7 11.0 10. 2 11. A s P e r t e c c of Icc.1 :.lie ~ d 4 . d - .0.069 . I 1 9

b. Should ::or tr Pra3:c.a v::h Skar lng: I o t a ! C a a : !rcrersm i . A s I.r<.ar of h. I=-orc Co.: 61.6 0.7 6.7 . A.6 6.5 5 . 1 I..> l . 1 : c . ?

' 1 1 . A. ?.rc.nc o f I~: . I i . : ~ t A d d . d i l 0.011 0 . 0 ~ 5 I 0 . i c 9 0.0'6 0.0:s c.::: 0.01: I C . k 2

. Frat 5,v!ng&q I > 7ccos?1:L? o f ! O i,:rrtr~r-ts:rr

1. A r ? c r c c n t o f AT l c p ~ r c Core . .. L' t rhrur Sh. r l , ( 3.5 3.9 . 3 . : . ' 8 . 3 1.0 0.0 i . 7 2.1 C.i

b . u l t h S D s r t ~ c b I , .

1.6 c-1 ~ J.5 7 ' 1.1 0 . 0 2. ' ( . I , r . A,- P*.?:*.*t of : r t , t .:a Sde A&,td -

a . Y l t h o u c S h a r l n ~ 0.712 0.171 1.:?1 2.757 0.115 0 .3 b. P!ch PharL~.& 0.756 0 . 4 5 0 , . 1.$10 0.116 3 .0

Page 58: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

I

TO ~ o t i - ~ a t e t k e f o l l s v i n g d i s c u s s - L A C , ce s h a l l EL::? t C G C 5 r < r : r 1 a ? a r t i c n l a :

f o m of t k e !.iIT r o l c l . Suppose =b.zt t::sre vr:e TAG ca>;cily :~c'-ricig ( I e , f o r wc?,

k~ 3ki > '? Ear o d j r a s i c g l e i ) a d :hzt t h e r e vtre no er.6?&en.cs 5 t t e r r . r - ? f ? t e I

i c p t c o s r ( i e , Aij = 0.0 , all i ztd j ) . ?'be f u l i ~ o d e l slculd t k e b k c 4ec~--?o,ccblc I

F 2 t o a set o f models, a c e f o r ecch p r o d u c t , of :he Zoi lcwing f c r z : ~

. I where R d e n c t e s t h e s e t of p r o c e s s e l e n e r t s !n which ~ r c c e s s i n g ils r e q u i r e d r o

i

prcduce product i . This i s .I very si:pla earif1 t o s o l v e . iJse eccdt- icn 1 2 ) to I

s u b s ~ i t u t e i n t o t h e objrcr:ve f c n c r i o n F o r yi; (31, fcr c , ; and, !b), f o r 2,. . 7Yi.e A K

I ' .

o b j ec t i v c f u n q t i o n t h e n becones : i I r

. . I

I .I I - I

- l a s t t c r n on t h e r l g h c $3 a cons tanc tern e q u a l :o ;kc ccsr a f i m p 8 r t i r . g a:: * I

I t h a t i s exoeenor!sly derranded: it m2.y be ~ e g l e c t e d . 3 e r.Fra {I; pkr:inck:escs t h a t

I

c u l t - l p l i e s x; i s t h e ~ a r g i n a ; s a v i n g s of c i c ~ e s t i c prcl1:cticn cver I:r.yc.r: c o s t : *

i s the u n i t i r . ao r t c ~ s t anti Gi i s t b ~ - - r ~ i 2 a l 6:csc of t:.-,cc?.stlc i

. . 2 y p r o d u c t i o n . Let I!S d e n o t e u n i t marg1z;il s a v i n g s . :+I? t~pi.:;:.;,t eql ln t ion ( 5 ) '

i

n i n u s one n l t l droc;) iny, :i:e c o n s t a n t t e r n , w o b t a i n :

Page 59: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

In equa t i on ( 6 ) , (i(xi) i s t he "breakeven func t i on" f o r ~ r o q u c t i: it

s t a t e s thc! t o t a l s av ings (of domest ic p r cduc t i on over import c o s t ) when t h e

q u a n t i t y x i s produced. Cne may e a s i l y v e r i f y t h a t marginal s a d i n g s must be i

p o s i t i v e i f i t i s t o be op t imal t o produce any of t h e product . Vhen MS > 0, i

one need on ly e v a l u a t e ( f o r va lue s of xi equa l t o z e ro and tho& marg ina l l y i

I

l e s s than m u l t i p l e s of C k / q i , kaKi, t o f i n d t h e op t imal s o l u t i o n . Th is is

because t h e f u n c t i o n 3 i s upward s l o p i n g excep t a t those p o i n t s &here a f i x e d i

cha rge is i n c u r r e d , where t h e r e i s a d i s con t i noub downward "jump"d The op t ima l

s o l u t i o n might b e t o produce some of t h e product and import t h e re(mainder, even

thosgh t h e t o t a l c o s t of domes t i c a l l y producing a s u f f i c i e n t v o l d e t o meet t h e

exogenous demand is l e s s than t h e c o s t of impor t ing a l l t h a t i s d e p n d e d . This

I

Under c a p a c i t y s h s r i n g , t h e f u l l MTP model is no longer decomposable i n t o

i n d i v i d u a l "produr:t models". Nonetheless , s t i l l assuming t h e r e a r + no endogenous

i n t e r m e d i a t e i n p u t s , one can o b t a i n a "reasonably good" s o l u t i o n by f i r s t ne-

. g l e c t i n g c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g and s o l v i n g each' s i n g l e product model coddensed i n I

q u a t i o n ( 6 ) . Let x* denote t h e va lue of xi t h a t m i m i r e s t h e brsakeven func t i on . i

C a l c u l a t e e* Ck q ( B k i X$ k i - Bki x;, kaKI, wf th r e s p e c t t o 'each product

independent ly and - C

wi th r e s p e c t t o a l l t h e p roduc ts j o i n t l y . The e and e,i v a r i a b l e s a r e measures k

of unexplo i ted i n c r e a s i n g r e t u r n s ; they s t a t e t h e amount by which t h e c a p a c i t y

con s t ruc t ed i n shops of a p a r t i c u l a r p roce s s e lement f a l l s s h o r t of t h e nzaxizum

amount t h a t could be cons t ruc t ed ~ i v e n t h e f i xed c o s t s t h a t have been i ncu r r ed .

I f : (Condi t ion 1 ) x* = D, f o r a l l i such t h a t XSi > 0 ; and (Condj t i cn 2 ) - i 1

Page 60: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- i -.

. ' ,-!.Lr + : 7 . ye 5!-cL-:a 0" < e* , K - 1 ,..., K , acd i s u c h :hat r k > 3 2 x 5 :, , z , - 1 j. .' - - . A

8. - k i . & I

-

z26el s o l ~ i t i c a s Iz715es g l o > a l o p t l r ~ 1 i ; y i f cer:aFz ~ e s t r ~ c t i z r - s 1 / - . -

ZTE 21.50 CEE. 3 r c o f s of t 5ese a s s e r t i c n s &re gF-:~n La : + e s t ~ l . a l

ar,d z l r e a d y ' ' i n existe: lceV by 7 . - t r tue of iEs use t o PrccGss

., ;-kith ,:f 0. 1-1 t h i s case, expans icn 3 prcrduct i t s

2 : ~ l r . g t3ose f i x e d c!iar&es ::':st have a l r e a d y been m e t

o:?,er products.

- 7 c n ? e z a n ~ .e i3eIs

7 - ,--- ~r .1 Y-:F-C .-; ;:-,

- * LX C c n d i z i c n I Is 'riolzted, t:?erl f: ;ray reduce systen c c s t s

s r o d u c t i o n of a ? r o l v c t f o r vh ich x: < 3 i such ;ha: XS > 0 , if * i'

to ~::pznd t h e c6paci:j. o f a s t o p ( o r s ~ v e r a l s h o p s ) r equ i red i n it..s

If Cond i t i r n 2 i s -riola:ed, then it m y reduce s j 7 s t e x roses :

:kc ~ r c d u c t i o n cf ~t l e a s ; cre of those p ~ c b u c t s r c a u i z i c g Flrciess

* k z e x 2, ;he=a ir Ls also s i :~ i -n :hat x > 12 i a s x f f i c i e n ; c c n t i l i c n 2 7 I:r.lf i

I 1.' - tka t c l e o p t k a i value of x, ~ n C e r c a 7 z c l t y starirg acsc be pcs i tkve.

I

!:o Z r . c r ~ a c e

. - i t is ?c.:s:b~e

prz2ccticn

c e a s e i e r e n t v h i c 5 e: > e-~cr some 1. i i t is l o t necraaviilp t ~ k : T L < s c + ( ~ : r~ P. i

* P f o r xhich e* > e that shsu lZ e s r e r i e n c e a rcducticr, i n 7rcdlJc:io .> :-cs5der, k k i . . I

* f z r example, a case :n uh'eh production at l e v e l r 4 r e q u L ~ e s !C, , ' [ 2 j A 5 u i t s A 1 " 1 + of capacit:; i n p r c c e s s elrrent 4, and ; ; r ~ d u c t i o n a t l e _ v e l :. . a l s r 1ret;uircs t h e

I .9

17 L

s a x nueber *>f u r . i t s c f caFzc::y L n p r o c e s s e lement k r , t ! - , ~ ~ r S e i n co ~ t k e z a - i * " T O ~ C t~ rc .q1; l r i r .g p r c c c ~ s i - ; : i? ..;is 1:rccess P . ~ F L ~ C ; ; " , ) ' ; I I F J ~ . E t h e . m

I

l/ Tne conciitior, i s s u f f i c i . x i t 5 a t n o t nc.cess?.iy. . T: .'- - .,., i t I:: ; : c : k:e,:c..:s;y :a:- :,p clc.-.,-..%L .-,., : - a tr.: I.? z ' n p i e e..:m-?l.es.. I

I

!

Page 61: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

and P l a r g e e>oocgh, t h i s can no t be o p t i n z l s i n c e t h e a s soc i a t ed i n c r e n e n t a l kl

t o t a l n a r g i n a l s av ings would n o t be s u f f i c i e n t t o o f f s e t t h e a d d i t i o n a l f i x e d

charge .

To su-riz~e, by t a k i n g t h e va lue s x* a s r e f e r e n c e p o i n t s and cons ide r i ng i

p c j s i b l e s av ings i n system c o s t s 1 ) through i n c r e a s i n g produc t ion by e x p l o i t i r g

c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g p o s s i b i l i t i e s where t h e r e a r e shops of l e s s t h a n maximum c a p a c i t y

and 2 ) through reduc ing produc t ion i n shops where economies of scale are n o t

s u f f i c i e n t l y e x p l o i t e d , one can o b t a i n a " reasonably good" solut ion. . The pro-

cedure is f u l l y s p e l l e d o u t i n Westphal and Rhee [1975]. However, t h e r e i s no

g c a r a n t e e t h a t t h e r e s u l t i n g s o l u t i o n i s t h e op t ima l s o l u t i o n ; no r i s i t p o s s i b l e

t o s t a t e how f a r i t i s from t h e g l o b a l optimum.

Breakeven a n a l y s i s c an a l s o be used when endogenous i n t e rn i ed i a t e i n p u t c o s t s

and demands must b e taken in:o account . A s no ted i n s e c t i o n 11, t h e Korean d a t a

e x h i b i t no c i r c u l a r in te rdependence among i n t e r m e d i a t e i npu t f lows. The o r d e r i n g

of p roduc t ion a c t i v i t i e s and produc ts i n such a way t h a t A = 0.0 f o r i > j i j

makes i t a s imple uatter t o c a l c u l a t e t h e lower bound, MCi, on t h e marg ina l c o s t

o f p roduc t i ng t h e i ' t h i tem: 2- 1

MCi = C V B + G + Z

A ~ i P~ , where p = min (MC , v . ) ,

k k i 1-1 1 j J ( 7 )

K, e A

and one c a l c u l a t e s n a r g i n a l c o s t s s t a r t i n g w i th t h e f i r s t product and proceeds

- i n o r d e r . Observe t h a t p i n equa t ion (7 ) is t h e same as t h a t i n t h e Marginal

1 '3 L

Cost Model. The f i r s t s t e p of ou r procedure t o o b t z i n a s o l u t i o n is t o s e t xi -,O - f o r i such t h a t ?iCi Wi. ObsZrve t h a t IIC 2 W i s a s u f f i c i e n t c o n d i t i c n t h a t x - 0 i n t h e op t ima l s o l u t i o n P i i i

- . J u s t a s lower bounds on n a r g i n a l c o s t may b e c a l c u l a t e d , upper bocnds on o u t -

put l e v e l s may be c a l c u l a t e d . And a g a i n , t h e t r i a n g u l a r i t y of t h e A mat r ix s i m -

p l i f i e s the p:ocess. Let X denote t h e upper bound on t h e p roduc t ion of t h e i ' t h i

p roduc t , then:

I

Xi Di + Z A X , f o r icI : j=i+l ij j x

Page 62: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 63: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

Furthermore, t h e r e i s no vap t o a d j u s t t h e s i n g l e p roduc t models, f o r ex&mple by

i n c l u d i n g i n d i r e c t f i x e d charges (which l e a d s t o double- counting c o s t s ) o r va lu ing

i n t e r n e d i a t e inpucs a t world p r i c e s (which l e a d s t o n e g l e c t i n g I0 in te rdependence) ,

t o g a i n a c l e a r advan tage fn r h e s o l u t i o n s ob t a ined u s ing them.

The d i s c u s s i o n has s o f a r preceeded a s i f one had e s t i m a t e s of t h e exogenous

derand l e v e l s , D However, -ae v e r e unab le t o o b t a i n such e s t i m a t e s , a s t h e i '

sample survey work which would have been r equ i r ed was beyond t he lirnits of our

r e sou rce s . I n s t e a d , t h e e n g i a e e r s provided t h e set of expected o u t p u t l e v e l s , xz.

The s o l u t i o n procedure rook t h e s e a s t h e upper bounds f o r t h e permiasab le p roduc t ion

l e v e l s i n t h e s i n g l e p rcduc t c o d e l s s t a t e d i n equa t i on (8). The s i n g l e product

model s o l u t i o n s , xo g i v e t h e s o l u t i o n wi thout c a p a c i t y sha r i ng . These va lue s i'

were then taken as r e f e r e n c e p o i n t s and a d j u s t e d accord ing t o t h e method ske tched

o u t above t o i n c r e a s e t h e p roduc t ion of product i, i.1 i f xy was l e s s than xe X' i

and i f i t was p r o f i t a b l e t o e x p l o i t c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g i n " ex i s t i ng" shops of l e s s - t h an maximum c a p a c i t y . In =king t h e adjustment t o e x p l o i t c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g pos-

s i b i l i t i e s , we were a t t emp t ing t o o b t a i n a reasonably good s o l u t i o n t o equa t i on

(9 ) , s u b j e c t t o t h e c o n s t r a i n t s t h a t x < xe i.1 i - i' x'

0 The v a l u e s of x were not a d j u s t e d t o dec r ea se t h e p rcduc t ion of sorce p roduc ts i

i if xi - x0 wi th c a p a c i t y . s h a r i n g vould r e s u l t i n such a small shop t h a t t h e a s - i

s o c i a t e d incrementa l s av ings vould n o t cover t h e f i x e d c o s t of i ts c n n s t r u c t i o n .

That is, we d i a n o t a d j u s t t he s i n g l e product model s o l u t i o n s f o r v i o l a t i o n s of 'I -

.%

Ccndi t ion 2 . Such ad jus tments v e r e i n gene ra l n o t r equ i r ed . Furthermore, by - - - B n o t making s u c p ad ju s tmen t s , b-e can s t a t e t h a t our s o l u t i o n s gove t h e upper bound * - t o t h e g l o b a l l y op t imal va lue of xi i n t h e f u l l MIF model. This is n o t a n a n a l y t -

i c a l r e s u l t , bu t r a t h e r depends upon t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h e s o l i t u o n s ob-

t a i n e d .

The procedure we employed n e g l e c t s t h e m a t e r i a l ba l ance c o n s t r a i n t s . I n

t e rms of simply a s s u r i n g t h e c o n s i s t e n t c y of q u a n t i t i e s , t h i s does not c o n s t i t u t e

Page 64: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

J;

bO 1

3

do

lr

:

(3

X

U

'rl

U U

(3 u

d

0-r)rl

.rl T

I %

3

.d ffl

wa

ww

0

3

k

.-I $

a

a

>

74

.c

3

U.

00

m

.c

>

GI 4).

U

Page 65: ...DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

. . Cherer;,, :o::is 3 . , 1952, f f0. .~rc2=zcl t ; r acd t>.e ?Lcce ler2 t lon ?rir.cis?.e, I'

E c c z c ~ . e ~ r i c z , SO, 1-22.

7 . 7 . - Cherer;r, :?g:::s 5., 1559, I I T k L-.terdeyerfence of I zves tncn t z e c l s i c n s , " Lq I!. - . - A3pLnc.,rizz, e s . 2:. , T;".? .:-llcc?:isn cl" =ccr.cr.:c: :? zcurces , Stri-2or.l: StarYcrd - Uci-,-ersity rre ss.

I n s t i h t e f o r &search i.. k c l a l Sc iecce , Vz2re r s l t y of !:orth C e r o l k e , 1953, -. "hcu t -&t - ,u t i'Lr.zlysis Sc-riet ::az-.;T Xrc:?i?rq; ( k - ~ i e t 131zrLyLyg Study :Io. 6 ) , I f .. . Chapel n~ll. (n ixeo . )

I n s t i t u t e f o r ?*search 3 Scclzl Sclezce, Cnl=-e=.si',y of !:crth Carol:,-..a, 1959, m nFroduct ion CocfYicle2ts zcd i e c h o l o g f c ~ l 'i'ren2s L? Sovie t I ~ < u s t ; - ~ : 1.n

In~ut-Cutnu' , -2-mlgsis of )iac:.lberj- C c ~ s t r c c t i o n ( Sc-r let P l a r x i z g Study 20. 7): "

]4zpxe, S, , 1973, u.3. 'IJ,.ced I x t e g e r Alge r i tF -7 Tor P r o j e c t 2 - . d - ~ r t i c n : ~ ' L? L. !-!. Goreux snd $. , 5. :!??~le, &. , :.!i11%F-i.evel ?! 3n22?z : C Z SP St7:dfe s 55 I ' ! ~ : ~ c c , A ~ s t e r d a x : ::cr"vh-!!ollar,d ?:blishLig Co .

- l!zr::o!jits, s a r y ~ :.!. , 2nd k l z n J . ncm, 1963, "J- !lachin.e - ? c c ~ - .- -- T. C a "opnans, e d . , S h d i 2 3 i n y o c e ss . : .zal~sis , .re:.~ lark : zokd? Yi ley a::& - Sons, Inc .

- V i e t o r i s z , Thcnas, 1973, 1 ' 2 2 ~ ~ 5 x 3 zt the :.!icro Lcvel : The Fez-s; ~ l e c t r i c a l - E ~ u i p ~ e n t ~ q d u s t r ; 5n :Iexico, I t iijashir.r,:on. ( 3 ~ i e o . ) - -

9 Westphrl, L o F r j 3., 1975, I1?la-ni lg ;. th ~ c o n o z l e s of ~ c z l e , "37 C . 3. 2lit=c:., m 7 - ,.. * 7. 3. Clark, 2nd L. l a y l o r , cd.;. , :-concr.-,--;;:cc : ' c d c l ~ zn.! ?~v~ !c r - ,?n% ?:-.r.ntr.c - -- - 9

London: @Lord Unlverp;+-r 3 - V J Press ( f o r t>.c Ylcrld x ~ : c ) .

n .. . . -. ;-Jest?l'lal, L.7.r~"r L., i-nd L~LYG ii. ?see, 1975, Iri. Frccezs .\;;zlysis l.!cdel c f t he - P!cchcnical ; r . g lEec rL i~ k c t c r , " h'ss'r.i?~-~n. (ni-.eo . )