| dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match...

69

Transcript of | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match...

Page 1: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 2: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 3: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 4: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 5: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 6: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 7: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 8: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 9: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 10: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 11: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 12: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 13: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 14: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 15: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 16: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 17: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 18: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 19: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 20: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 21: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 22: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 23: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 24: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 25: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 26: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 27: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 28: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 29: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 30: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 31: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 32: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 33: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 34: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 35: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 36: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 37: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 38: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 39: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 40: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 41: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 42: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 43: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 44: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 45: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 46: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 47: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 48: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 49: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 50: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 51: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 52: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 53: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 54: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 55: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 56: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 57: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 58: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 59: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 60: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 61: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 62: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 63: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 64: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 65: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 66: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 67: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 68: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,
Page 69: | dpw · Prior to the RPT AC hearing, OTR adjusted the net retable area in their analysis to match that of the Petitioner. After factoring in a few more adjustments to the analysis,