© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 1814 – A Year of Miracles for Norwegians? Nordic...

25
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 1814 – A Year of Miracles for Norwegians? Nordic Aspects of the Napoleonic Wars – The Treaty of Kiel and Its Effects Ola Mestad Professor dr. juris Chair of the Norwegian Research Committee for the Constitution Bicentennial The Norwegian Constitution at 200 Years I Târgoviște, 1 – 4 August 2014

Transcript of © DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 1814 – A Year of Miracles for Norwegians? Nordic...

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

1814 – A Year of Miracles for Norwegians?

Nordic Aspects of the Napoleonic Wars – The Treaty of Kiel and Its Effects

Ola MestadProfessor dr. juris

Chair of the Norwegian Research Committee for the Constitution Bicentennial

The Norwegian Constitution at 200 Years ITârgoviște, 1 – 4 August 2014

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Chronology of 1814• 14 January Treaty of Kiel• 16 Feb Meeting of high ranking men at Eidsvoll• 10 April – 20 May The Constitutional Assembly at

Eidsvoll• 17 May - The Constitution adopted

– Prince Christian Frederik offered the Norwegian Crown

• End July / Early August Swedish-Norwegian War• 14 August The Moss Convention on armistice• 7 Oct - 26 Nov The extraordinary Storting • 4 Nov Carl 13 of Sweden elected King of Norway

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

What was the Peace of Kiel?• Two peace treaties dated 14 January 1814

– Between Sweden and Denmark– Between Britain and Denmark

• Territorial restructuring in Northern Europe– Norway to be united with Sweden– Swedish Pomerania and Rügen to become part of

Denmark

• And some effects in Asia, Africa and America• A part of the end of the Napoleonic wars

– Why Kiel? The capital of the Danish duchies Schleswig and Holstein

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Political background• Denmark-Norway allied with Napoleon since 1807• The building of alliances against Napoleon

– British and Russian interests– Later Prussian and Austrian interests

• Sweden had lost Finland to Russia in 1809– Coup d’état and new constitution in Sweden– New king: Carl 13– Sweden adopted the French Marshal Bernadotte as Crown Prince

in 1810

• Bernadotte changed Swedish foreign policy– Rather get Norway in the West than trying to win back Finland in

the East

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Swedish sucessful treaty strategy - Russia• Treaty with Russia 1812

– The treaty of St. Petersburg 5 April 1812

• Offensive and defensive alliance• First acquire Norway for Sweden, then

attack the French troops• (But then Napoleon invaded Russia)

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Swedish sucessful treaty strategy - Britain• Treaty with Britain

– The treaty of Stockholm 3 March 1813

• Treaty of Concert and Subsidy, linked to the treaty with Russia

• British Naval co-operation• Swedish-Norwegian union “with every

possible regard and consideration for the happiness and liberty of the people of Norway”

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Swedish sucessful warfare• Völkerschlacht in Leipzig 16 – 19 October 1813

– Napoleon defeated

• The Army of the North under Bernadotte deviated to the North to win Norway in Holstein

• Occupied Holstein including Kiel 9-12 December

• Armistice 15 December• Negotiations leading to the two treaties of Kiel

200 years ago

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Swedish Danish Kiel Treaty – main content• Peace between Denmark and Sweden• Alliance against Napoleonic France• Cession of the Kingdom of Norway to the King

of Sweden– Excluding Iceland, Greenland and the Faroe Islands

• Cession of the Duchy of Swedish Pomerania and Principality of Rügen to Denmark

• Military withdrawal from Denmark• Provisions on proclamations to the involved

subjects

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Reception in Norway of the Treaty in January/February 1814• Protest and regret• Prince Christian Frederik, the governor, and

heir to the throne, wanted to use his hereditary right and lead Norway’s independence as king

• 25 January he wrote: «The King has no right to renounce the inheritance of his family»

• The prince called for a meeting with men ”of the highest rank”

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Meeting at Eidsvoll 16/17 February• 21 participants of «the highest rank»

– Leading lawyers, professors, officers, merchants

• Marcus Rosenkrantz– Declared «it to be illegal if the Prince, without the consent of the

people, took the title of king»

• Georg Sverdrup– «No one has a better right to the crown than himself (Sverdrup)

and anybody else»

• Prince Christian Frederik changed his mind, adopted title as regent, arranged for election to the constitutional assembly

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Prince Christian Frederik (1786-1848)

Painted in 1813

Danish Norwegian prince

King of Norway 19 May – 10 October 1814

King of Denmark 1839-1848

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Christian Frederik’s declaration of 19 February 1814• “The Norwegian people, absolved from its

oath to the mighty, high born Prince, Frederik the Sixth … [is] … accordingly given back the full right of a free and independent people to decide itself its constitution of government.”

• A declaration of independence and call for a constitutional assembly

• The Constitution to be adopted by the “people” with no formal role of the regent Christian Frederik

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

What made the Prince change his mind?• Was it modern theory of sovereignty of the

people?– Based on Rousseau, The Social Contract (1762)

» Sovereignty rests always with the people and cannot be transferred, only delegated

» It is unalienable and indivisible

• Or was it the absolutist contract theory of Denmark-Norway?

• In Denmark-Norway absolutism was formally established through oaths by the people in 1660-1661

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Establishment of absolutism - Separate Norweigan oath• Oath of allegiance at the old castle of

Akershus 5 August 1661 • 555 persons signed the documents in

Christiania [now Oslo]– 17 noblemen– 3 bishops– 82 priests and canons– 9 judges (lagmenn)– 36 mayors and burghers– 408 peasants

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Lex Regia 1665• Transfer of absolute power to the King confirmed

for “our two realms Denmark and Norway”. • This includes “all Jura Majestatis, absolute

power, sovereignty and all Royal special rights and Regalia”

• “Our hereditary realms Denmark and Norway … shall be and remain … undivided and continue under one hereditary absolutist king of Denmark and Norway”

• Contract theory: Hugo Grotius, Henning Arnisæus

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Danish constitutional theory under absolutism• Ludvig Holberg 1684-1754

– Follower of Samuel Pufendorf – Contracts of association and of subjection

• Jens Schielderup Sneedorff (1724-1764)• Andreas Schytte (1726-1777)• Lauritz Nørregaard (1745-1804)

– Follower of Christian Wolff

• Johan Frederik Wilhelm Schlegel (1765-1836)– Follower of Immanuel Kant

• All of them: Natural law social contract theory

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

J.F.W. Schlegel’s opinion • Schlegel (1765-1836)

– Law professor in Copenhagen, teacher of the founding fathers

• «A people who has transferred the sovereignty, cannot take it back because that would in itself be an act of sovereignty… The one who holds the sovereignty, may voluntarily return it again, if the people will accept it. To others than the people, he may not transfer it, because it is a restricted personal right (jus mere personale)…»

– Schlegel 1798

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Kiel Treaty – the effect of Article IV • In Article IV, the Norwegians were absolved

from their oath of allegiance to the Danish King and the Crown of Denmark

• This was also repeated in the proclamation from the King to the people

• This dissolution of the bond between subjects and sovereign was understood by the Norwegians to return the sovereignty to the people of Norway

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Christian Frederik’s declaration of 19 February 1814• “The Norwegian people, absolved from its

oath to the mighty, high born Prince, Frederik the Sixth … [is] … accordingly given back the full right of a free and independent people to decide itself its constitution of government.”

• A declaration of independence and call for a constitutional assembly

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Was this possible effect known in Kiel?• Yes• Norway could not be ceded to Sweden without

consent from the Norwegian and Danish estates– Letter 10 April 1813 from Frederik 6 to the Swedish chargé

d’affaires

• Also the instructions dated 31 December 1813 to the Danish negotiator Bourke in Kiel appears to assume the effect of absolving the Norwegians from their oath

• And, there was also a related law of nations argument – Grotius, Pufendorf, Emer de Vattel

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

What did the Treaty of Kiel do?• Intended consequences

– Tore apart the old Danish-Norwegian State– Split the old Kingdom of Norway in two

» The mainland became Norway, and entered a weak union with Sweden

» The old Norwegian provinces Iceland, Greenland and the Faroes staid with Denmark

• Unintended consequences– Gave the sovereignty back to the Norwegian people– Started the development of Norway as a constitutional

democracy

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

What else did it lead to?• Swedish Pomerania and Rügen sold to

Prussia by Denmark during the Congress of Vienna

– Part of Prussian Northbound expansion

• Marshal Bernadotte became King Carl Johan of Sweden and Norway (1818-1844)

• Christian Frederik became King of Denmark as Christian 8 (1839-1848)

• From August 1814 and for 200 years there has been peace between the Nordic states