Assessing Student Engagement. 1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other...

28
NSSE Assessing Student Engagement

Transcript of Assessing Student Engagement. 1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other...

Page 1: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

NSSEAssessing Student Engagement

Page 2: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

NSSE Defines Engagement As…

1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities

2. How institutional resources, courses, and other learning opportunities facilitate student participation in activities that matter to student learning

Page 3: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Engagement Indicators Academic Challenge

Learning With Peers

Experiences With Faculty

Campus Environment

Page 4: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

PSU Students vs. NE Public + Compar

Academic Challenge

o Higher Order Learning

o Reflective/Integrative Learning

o Learning Strategies

o Quantitative Reasoning

First Year Senior

NS p < .05

p < .05 p < .05

NS NS

p < .05 p < .05

Page 5: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Engagement Indicators Learning With Peers

o Collaborative Learning

o Discussions With Diverse Others

First YearSeniors

NS NS

NS p < .05

Page 6: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Engagement Indicators Experiences With Faculty

o Student-Faculty Interaction

o Effective Teaching Practices

First YearSeniors

p < .05 p < .05

p < .05 p < .05

Page 7: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Engagement Indicators Campus Environment

o Quality of Interactions

o Supportive Environment

First YearSeniors

NS p < .05

NS p < .05

Page 8: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

High Impact Practices in NSSE

Learning Community (taking 2+ classes together)

Service Learning

Work with Faculty on Research

Internship/Co-op/Field/Clinical/Student teaching

Study Abroad

Capstone (course/project/thesis/portfolio)

Page 9: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

HIPs

First Year PSU: LC, SL, Rsch

o 8%: 2 + HIPso 53%: 1 HIP

NE Pub & Comp. 12%: 2 + HIPs46%: 1 HIP

Senior PSU: LC, SL, Rsch

o 79%: 2 + HIPso 15%: 1 HIP

NE Pub & Comp

61%: 2 + HIPs25%: 1 HIP

Page 10: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Academic Challenge

Page 11: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Time Spent Preparing for Class (per week)

First Year 13.0 hrs PSU

13.3 hrs NE Pub & Comp

Senior 13. 6 hrs PSU

14.0 hrs NE Pub & Comp

Page 12: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Reading (per week)

First Year 6.7 hrs PSU

6.2 hrs NE Pub & Comp

Senior 6.2 hrs PSU

6.5 hrs NE Pub & Comp

Page 13: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Writing (avg. pages assigned)

First Year 53.6 PSU

47.1 NE Pub & Comp

Senior 81.8 PSU

74.2 NE Pub & Comp

Page 14: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Challenging Courses (do best work)

First Year 44% high challenge

PSU

47% high challenge NE Pub & Comp

Senior 50% high challenge

PSU

56% high challenge NE Pub & Comp

Page 15: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Academic Emphasis (very much/quite a bit)

First Year 72% PSU

80% NE Pub & Comp

Senior 73% PSU

78% NE Pub & Comp

Page 16: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Perceived Gains: Seniors

Page 17: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Percent: very much/quite a bit

91% Thinking critically/analytically 84% Writing clearly/effectively 83% Speaking clearly/effectively 83% Working effectively with others 79% Acquiring work-related knowledge/skills 68% Developing/clarifying personal code of

ethics 67% Being an informed, active citizen 66% Solving complex real-world problems 59% Understanding other backgrounds (race,

econ) 55% Analyzing numerical/statistical information

Page 18: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Item Comparisons

Page 19: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Highest Performing Relative to NE Public + Comparators Combined ideas from different courses when completing

assignments

Worked with other students on course projects or assignments

Reached conclusions based on your own analysis of numerical information

Quality of interactions with: Students

Quality of interactions with: Student services staff

First-Year Students

Page 20: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Lowest Performing Relative to NE Public + Comparators Discussions with: People of a race or ethnicity other than your own

Helping you manage your non-academic responsibilities

Discussions with: People with religious beliefs other than your own

Contact among students from different backgrounds

Participated in a learning community or some other formal program where

First-Year Students

Page 21: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Highest Performing Relative to NE Public + Comparators

Completed a culminating senior experience

Discussed course topics, ideas with a faculty member outside of class

Quality of interactions with: Academic advisors

Talked about career plans with a faculty member

At least some courses included a community-based project (service-learning)

Seniors

Page 22: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Lowest Performing Relative to NE Public + Comparators

Contact among students from different backgrounds

Discussions with: People from an economic background other than your own

Discussions with: People with religious beliefs other than your own

Reviewed your notes after class

Discussions with: People of a race or ethnicity other than your own

Seniors

Page 23: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Advising Module

Page 24: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

First Year 2.3 vs. 2.2 # times discussed academic issues 3.0 vs. 3.0 extent advisor available 2.7 vs. 2.8 informed of important deadlines 2.7 vs. 2.8 helped understand academic

policies 2.7 vs. 2.7 informed academic support

options 2.8 vs. 2.9 useful information about courses 2.6 vs. 2.7 helped with academic difficulties 2.4 vs. 2.5 discussed careers post-grad plans

Page 25: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Seniors 3.3 vs. 2.3 # times discussed academic issues 3.3 vs. 3.0 extent advisor available 3.0 vs. 2.7 informed of important deadlines 2.8 vs. 2.7 helped understand academic

policies 2.7 vs. 2.4 informed academic support

options 3.1 vs. 2.7 useful information about courses 3.1 vs. 2.6 helped with academic difficulties 3.0 vs. 2.5 discussed careers post-grad plans

Page 26: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Satisfaction With PSU

Page 27: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Overall rating: “excellent or good”

First Year 86% PSU

83% NE Public & Comp

Senior 90% PSU

83% NE Public & Comp

Page 28: Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.

Definitely/Probably would attend again

First Year 82% PSU

80% NE Public & Comp

Senior 83% PSU

78% NE Public & Comp