Aristotle Living things are “Immutable” Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no...

29
Evolution Lesson 2 – Evolution of an Idea

Transcript of Aristotle Living things are “Immutable” Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no...

Page 1: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

EvolutionLesson 2 – Evolution of an Idea

Page 2: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Aristotle

Living things are “Immutable”

Page 3: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Buffon (1707-1788) Observed anatomical

features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.

Theorized that this was evidence that species have changed over time.

Page 4: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778) – Developed classification system that highlighted similarities between organisms.

Erasmus Darwin (1731-1802) – Believed organisms change over time and the earth was millions of years old. All life originated

from a single source. Did not propose a mechanism for this.

Page 5: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Chevalier de Lamarck (1744-1829)

One of the first scientists to propose a mechanism for evolution.

Lamrack’s First Principle: Use and disuse

He believed that structures an individual used became larger and stronger, while structures that were not used became smaller and weaker.

Page 6: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.
Page 7: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.
Page 8: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Lamrack’s Second Principle: The Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics

He believed that individuals could pass on to their offspring characteristics they had acquired during their lives.

Page 9: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.
Page 10: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.
Page 11: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Lamarck’s Contributions

All species evolve over time A species evolves in response to its

environment and becomes better adapted to that environment

Changes are passed on from generation to generation

Page 12: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.
Page 13: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Georges Cuvier (1769-1832): a famous paleontologist who conducted the first

detailed studies of fossils. He noted the following: Fossils of very simple organisms are found in all

depths of fossil deposits Fossils of more complex organisms are found

only at shallower depths, in younger rock Fossils in the shallower depths are more likely to

resemble living species Rock layers contain fossils of many species that do not occur in layers above or below them.

Page 14: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Theory of Catatrophism (Cuvier) the theory of catastrophism which states that the patterns of fossils could be

accounted for by a series of global catastrophes (such as floods) that wiped out most species on Earth. These wiped out species were then replaced with a newly created set of species.

   

Page 15: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Charles Lyell (1797-1875):

- The father of geology. He studied rocks and fossils and came up with the opposite conclusion to Cuvier.

Page 16: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Charles Lyell

He proposed the theory of uniformitarianism. Earth has been changed by the same processes

in the past that are occurring in the present Geological change is slow and gradual rather

than fast and catastrophic Natural laws that influence these changes are

constant and eternal, and they operated in the past with the same intensity as they do today.

Lyell’s theories directly challenged the belief in a very young Earth. If he was right, Earth was extremely old and life had had a very long time to undergo evolutionary change.

Page 17: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Charles Darwin (1809-1882):

22 years old, he set sail along the HMS Beagle for a five year voyage.

Page 18: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.
Page 19: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Darwin

During his travels, he visited the Galapagos Islands where he made a valuable observation. He noted that the flora and fauna on the Galapagos Islands resembled to the ones on continental South America even though they had complete different habitats.

Page 20: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.
Page 21: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Darwin

He also noted that there were no amphibians or large mammals on the island, indicating that only species that could arrive by air or water lived in the Galapagos.

It seemed that the islands had been populated by species that arrived from elsewhere; however, most of these species only resembled species in the mainland. This was the beginning of the theory of evolution.

Page 22: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Darwin’s Finches

Page 23: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.
Page 24: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.
Page 25: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Why’s Darwin a Big Deal?

Although Darwin was not the first to propose the theory of evolution he (along with Alfred Wallace) proposed natural selection as the mechanism of evolution. His years of study, observations and

writing gave enoughevidence for the theory to be seriously considered.

Page 26: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.
Page 28: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Current Interest in Lamarckism Epigenetics is the study of heritable changes in 

gene activity which are not caused by changes in the DNA sequence.

Changes can occur response to environmental

influences

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kp1bZEUgqVI

ARTICLE: http://discovermagazine.com/2013/may/13-grandmas-experiences-leave-epigenetic-mark-on-your-genes

Page 29: Aristotle  Living things are “Immutable”  Observed anatomical features that seemed to serve no purpose and wondered why they existed.  Theorized.

Examples - Diet in Humans Pregnant Woman who experience

starvation have abnormally small babies.

Their children (even if dietary needs are meet) have small Babies.

May be some epigenetic factors in obesity.