© 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

32
© 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

Transcript of © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

Page 1: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Analyzing CAD Spending

Trevor Scullion & Dan GerlachPartners: AutomationForce Inc.

Page 2: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Class Summary

Assessing your current CAD investments and deciding on where to focus future efforts is becoming increasingly complex. This class will show you how to:

Identify data collection targets Extract meaning from the captured data Generate reports Gauge effectiveness of training, hardware, standardization and automation.

With better data, you can make better decisions!

Page 3: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Learning Objectives

At the end of this class, you will be able to:

Analyze your CAD hardware use Analyze your CAD software usage Analyze your CAD users efficiency Create a Payback period and an ROI for funding

Page 4: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Time IS money

“Time is really the only capital that any human being has, and the only thing he can't afford to lose”.     - Thomas Edison

”We must use time as a tool, not as a couch”.     - John F. Kennedy

Page 5: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

But where does it all go?

License under-utilization The average company only utilises roughly 80-90% of its licenses on a daily basis

Inefficient Training Today, only 4 out of 10 companies set aside money for training their employees,

compared to 8 out of 10 in 2007 As a result, many CAD managers are spending unbudgeted time on support and training,

on average 12 hours a week responding to "How do I do this...?" questions

More software packages in use A typical company now uses 3.5 software packages to produce documentation

Page 6: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

But where does it all go?, continued

More complex software packages 3D systems are becoming more complex leading to a wider "Technology Gap”

Tough to get good outside support help 9 out of 10 companies now pay for support subscriptions every year, yet the average

CAD Manager will use this subscription as a first step less than 10% of the time. Mostly because the average time for satisfactorily closing a call stands at 39.3 hours or

almost 5 working days.

Bottom Line is:

We must be able to assess and address our CAD needs ourselves.

Page 7: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

What should we measure?

The resources needed to complete a task or project related to CAD.

Otherwise known in business jargon as “Bandwidth”

Page 8: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

It’s ALWAYS a “Bandwidth” issue

As a team, we’ve learned to measure the performance of CAD groups by these three distinct bandwidth channels:

Hardware bandwidth Can the machines keep up with the software and user speed

Software bandwidth Is the software setup to take advantage of hardware and user skills

User bandwidth Are the users leveraging hardware and software to the maximum capacity

Page 9: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Hardware Bandwidth

•The ability of the computer to keep a 3D model up-to-date as we add complexity.•Part features, unique assembly parts and drawing view details add to the effort placed on the hardware.

Page 10: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Hardware Specs

How to compare hardware What to measure Tools for the job

Page 11: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Characterizing Current Hardware

Graphics Hardware Graphics Memory, Resolution, Refresh Rates, etc.

System Hardware Processor Type, Cache, RAM, Disk info, Core(s), etc.

Software Configuration OS, OpenGL info, Graphics Drivers, etc.

Price, Availability, etc.

Page 12: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Comparing Hardware with SPEC* benchmarks

SPEC Apps Benchmarks are published Non Profit Organization Memberships available Open Source

*(SPEC) Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation

Page 13: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Measuring

Use SPEC Composite Values Use Workbook Tool Share

Page 14: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Measure Hardware….. - Rinse and Repeat

With your hardware analysis in hand, you can begin to adjust settings and configurations. Then re-measure to ensure you’re making the best use of your hardware. Repeat as necessary.

Optimum drivers and settings Optimum service packs and settings Overall CAD setup including

Best use of Levels-of-Detail Constraint management Symbols for standard details

Page 15: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Software Bandwidth

Measuring the level at which the software is taking advantage of the hardware and user skills

Page 16: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Comparing Software

Comparing versions, sometimes new versions are better! Looking for CAD Apps Measuring true usage Tools for the job

Page 17: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Software - What to Measure

Where time is spent Features in use Possible Add-ons Possible Automation

Page 18: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Software – Tools

Inventor API Enterprise tools Cloud-based solutions

Page 19: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

User Bandwidth

Page 20: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Evaluating Users

Measure each member of your group Run assessments Run a Benchmark design

Tools for Comparison

Page 21: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

User Assessment Tools

The Workbook Online Tools Online Tests

Page 22: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Budgets – How to win Budgets

Page 23: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Budgets – Make it about business not IT

Payback and ROI built on key performance indicators or KPI Using the Workbook Tools for the task

Page 24: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Budgets – Select your KPI*

Improve design efficiency by X% Increase project throughput by X% Improve user productivity by X% Reduce field errors by X%

Must be clearly measurable for folks outside CAD

*Key Performance Indicators (KPI)

*Key Performance Indicator

Page 25: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Budgets – Return On Investment

The ROI calculation measures the ongoing return on an investment —typically on an annualized basis.

ROI % = (Return - Cost of investment) x 100                        Cost of investment

Page 26: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Budgets – CAD Return On Investment

Our workbook calculations

Page 27: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Budgets - Payback Period

The payback period determines how quickly the investment cost will be fully recovered.

Payback Period = Cost of Project / Annual Cash Inflows

Our CAD Calculation Payback Period in Years = Total CAD Spend / (Annual CAD Design

Engineer Loaded Salary * Productivity Gain)

Page 28: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Budgets – Make it about business, not technology

Historically CAD budgets go to: Upkeep: Ongoing costs/ subscriptions Software Upgrades Additional Software Modules or add-ons Training Hardware

But none of these talk about KPI’s, you need to use a methodology that will help you build a solid case that you can present to the business

Page 29: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Demonstration of the Workbook

Page 30: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Summary Using the right analysis tools can make a CAD managers life easier

Hardware analysis Use tools like SPEC or Zoeked

Software analysis Use scripts or other tools to get a snapshot of your current software usage Run an internal benchmarks

User analysis Benchmark, assess and/or test users

Choose KPI’s Select Key Performance Indicators

Allocate your CAD budget to maximize your ROI and Payback based on measurable KPI’s

Page 31: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Thank you

Get the workbook:

[email protected]@automationforce.com

Page 32: © 2012 Autodesk Analyzing CAD Spending Trevor Scullion & Dan Gerlach Partners: AutomationForce Inc.

© 2012 Autodesk

Autodesk, AutoCAD* [*if/when mentioned in the pertinent material, followed by an alphabetical list of all other trademarks mentioned in the material] are registered trademarks or trademarks of Autodesk, Inc., and/or its subsidiaries and/or affiliates in the USA and/or other countries. All other brand names, product names, or trademarks belong to their respective holders. Autodesk reserves the right to alter product and services offerings, and specifications and pricing at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. © 2012 Autodesk, Inc. All rights reserved.