© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 16 Juvenile...
-
Upload
trinity-lockhart -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 16 Juvenile...
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Chapter Chapter 1616
Juvenile Juvenile Corrections:Corrections:
End of an End of an Era?Era?
1
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
A Brief History A Brief History The English and American juvenile justice systems
use the doctrine of parens patriae. Latin term that refers to the state as guardian of minors
and incompetent people Historically, juvenile offenders in England were
confined with adults. In 1704, John Howard introduced a Roman
institutional model for juvenile offenders. American colonists brought his ideas to the new world.
Reformers tailored Howard’s ideas to create houses of refuge, reform schools, and industrial schools for juveniles.
2
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
A Brief History – A Brief History – ContinuedContinued
In 1825, the first legally chartered American custodial institution for juvenile offenders, the New York House of Refuge, was established by penal reformer Thomas Eddy, education reformer John Griscom, and the Society for the Prevention of Pauperism.
The Lyman School, the first state-sponsored reform school, opened in Massachusetts in 1848. Reform School – a penal institution to which
especially young or first-time offenders are committed for training and reformation
3
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
The Juvenile CourtThe Juvenile Court
People ex rel. O’Connell v. Turner (1870)– the Illinois Supreme Court began the movement toward creating a separate juvenile court
That movement came to fruition in 1899, when the Illinois legislature established the nation’s first juvenile court in Cook County (Chicago)
4
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Juvenile EuphemismsJuvenile Euphemisms Delinquents Taken into custody Petition is filed Held on petition Adjudicatory hearing Finding Disposition Adjudicated Training school Aftercare
Criminals Arrested Charge filed Indicted Trial Verdict Sentence Convicted Prison Parole
5
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Landmark Cases Landmark Cases
Kent v. United States (1966) – in cases involving transfer of jurisdiction, juveniles are entitled to certain essential due process rights, such as a hearing, an attorney, access to records, a written statement of reasons for the transfer
In re Gault (1967) – juvenile offenders have the right to reasonable notice of charges, appointed counsel, question witnesses, and protection against self-incrimination
6
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Landmark Cases – Landmark Cases – ContinuedContinued In re Winship (1970) – the guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt standard should be required in all delinquency adjudications
McKeiver v. Pennsylvania (1971) – the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not require jury trials in juvenile court
Breed v. Jones (1975) – the double jeopardy protection applies to juvenile adjudication proceedings
Shall v. Martin (1984) – preventive detention may be used for juveniles
7
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Juvenile Crime Juvenile Crime
Delinquent offenses - acts committed by juveniles that, if committed by adults, could result in criminal prosecution
Status offenses - acts that are law violations only for juveniles such as running away, truancy, or ungovernability Sometimes referred to as incorrigibility or
being beyond parental control
8
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
The Juvenile Justice ProcessThe Juvenile Justice Process
The three phases of the juvenile justice process are: Intake Adjudication Disposition
9
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Intake Intake
The first stage of the juvenile justice process.
A court-appointed officer reviews the case and recommends a course of action— dismissal, informal disposition, formal disposition, or transfer to adult criminal court
10
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
DetentionDetention
Detention Hearing – a judicial review of the intake officer’s detention decision
Juvenile detention facility – a facility for keeping juvenile offenders in secure custody, as necessary, through various stages of the juvenile justice process
Guardian Ad Litem – a person appointed by the juvenile court, often defense counsel, to serve as a special guardian for the youth being processed through the juvenile justice system
11
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Adjudication Adjudication
The process by which a court arrives at a final disposition in a case; also the second stage in the juvenile justice process
The court decides whether the offender is formally responsible for (guilty of) the alleged offense
Equivalent to the trial in adult criminal cases
12
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Disposition Disposition
The third stage of the juvenile justice process in which the court decides the disposition (sentence) for a juvenile case
Equivalent to the sentencing of an adult offender
Predisposition report – a report that documents (1) the juvenile’s background; (2) educational history; (3) information gathered from interviews with the juvenile, family members, and others; (4) available placement options; and (5) recommended dispositions
13
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Types of Dispositions Types of Dispositions Probation Commitment to group homes
A non-secure residential facility for juveniles Residential treatment
A residential facility that provides intensive treatment services to juveniles
Boot camp Juvenile correctional institutions Blended sentencing
A two-part (juvenile and adult) sentence in which the adult sentence may be waved if the offender complies with all provisions of the juvenile sentence
14
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Evidence-Based Practice and Evidence-Based Practice and Juvenile CorrectionsJuvenile Corrections
Few studies have focused on reducing recidivism among juvenile offenders
Most effective strategy for treating and rehabilitating juvenile offenders Prevention programming Continuum of pre-trial and sentencing
placement options Services and sanctions Aftercare programs
An example is the approach used by the California Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
15
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
TransferTransfer
Juveniles may be transferred to adult court under
one of three provisions: Waiver Provisions – the juvenile court orders
transfer of the case to adult criminal court Direct File Provisions – the prosecutor
determines whether to initiate a case against a juvenile in juvenile court or in adult criminal court
Statutory Exclusion Provisions – the adult criminal court jurisdiction for certain juvenile cases is established by state law
16
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Juvenile Correctional FacilitiesJuvenile Correctional Facilities
Juvenile corrections functions are placed in various state agencies by the different states.
Operating budgets for the agencies ranged from $642 million (Florida) to about $10 million (North Dakota).
Nationwide, the number of delinquency cases involving detention increased 42 percent between 1985 and 2002, from 231,400 to 329,800.
17
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Teen Courts Teen Courts
Courts in which youths adjudicate and impose disposition for a juvenile offense
Also called peer and youth courts Have become a popular alternative to the
traditional juvenile court for young or first-time offenders
18
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Four Models of Teen CourtsFour Models of Teen Courts
The Adult Judge model – an adult serves as judge and youth serve as attorneys and court staff
The Youth Judge model – parallels the Adult Judge model, with the exception that a youth serves as judge
The Tribunal model – youth attorneys present the case to a panel of three youth judges
The Peer Jury model – uses no attorneys; the case is presented to the jury by a youth or adult and the jury questions the defendant
19
© 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill
Youth Gangs Youth Gangs
Gang: a criminal enterprise having an organizational structure, acting as a continuing criminal conspiracy, that employs violence and any other criminal activity to sustain itself
Youth gang: a gang whose membership is generally comprised of people between the ages of 12 and 24
Street gang: an organized group of people on the street often engaged in significant illegitimate or criminal activity
20