. 1 D 29, 2015 o . 111, N ol OFFICIAL GAZETTE … · F. JUVENILE JUSTICE AND ... (Revised IRR of RA...

2
F . J U V E N I L E J U S T I C E A N D W E L F A R E C O U N C I L S T R A T E G I C O B J E C T I V E S M A N D A T E T h e J u v e n i l e J u s t i c e a n d W e l f a r e C o u n c i l i s a p o l i c y - m a k i n g , c o o r d i n a t i n g a n d m o n i t o r i n g b o d y o n t h e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e J u v e n i l e J u s t i c e a n d W e l f a r e A c t , t h r o u g h i t s m e m b e r s a n d c o o r d i n a t i n g a g e n c i e s . ( R e v i s e d I R R o f R A 9 3 4 4 a s a m e n d e d b y R A 1 0 6 3 0 ) V I S I O N A C o u n c i l l e a d i n g a s o c i e t y t h a t p r o m o t e s a n d p r o t e c t s t h e r i g h t s o f c h i l d r e n a t r i s k a n d c h i l d r e n i n c o n f l i c t w i t h t h e l a w u n d e r a r e s t o r a t i v e j u s t i c e a n d w e l f a r e s y s t e m M I S S I O N T o i n s t i t u t i o n a l i z e a r e s t o r a t i v e j u s t i c e a n d w e l f a r e s y s t e m f o r c h i l d r e n a t r i s k a n d c h i l d r e n i n c o n f l i c t w i t h t h e l a w t h r o u g h t h e e f f e c t i v e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d c o o r d i n a t i o n a m o n g s t a k e h o l d e r s i n a p r o t e c t i v e a n d e n a b l i n g e n v i r o n m e n t K E Y R E S U L T A R E A S P o v e r t y r e d u c t i o n a n d e m p o w e r m e n t o f t h e p o o r a n d v u l n e r a b l e S E C T O R O U T C O M E P r e v e n t c h i l d r e n a t r i s k f r o m c o m m i t t i n g c r i m e s a n d e n s u r e t h a t c h i l d r e n i n c o n f l i c t w i t h t h e l a w a r e r e h a b i l i t a t e d a n d r e i n t e g r a t e d w i t h t h e i r f a m i l i e s a n d c o m m u n i t i e s O R G A N I Z A T I O N A L O U T C O M E C o o r d i n a t i o n o f g o v e r n m e n t a c t i o n s f o r t h e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e j u v e n i l e i n t e r v e n t i o n p r o g r a m s a n d a c t i v i t i e s i m p r o v e d

Transcript of . 1 D 29, 2015 o . 111, N ol OFFICIAL GAZETTE … · F. JUVENILE JUSTICE AND ... (Revised IRR of RA...

472 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT, FY 2016

E. NATIONAL YOUTH COMMISSION

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

MANDATE

The National Youth Commission is the policy-making coordinating body of all youth-related institutions, programs, projects, and

activities of the government.

VISION

The National Youth Commission aspires for an enabled, involved and patriotic youth realizing their aspirations; to this end, NYC

envisions itself as the voice and advocate of the youth.

MISSION

To promote sustainable developmental policies and programs for and with the Filipino Youth.

As a youth-centered agency:

- we advocate policies on youth protection and participation;

- we build partnerships and networks; and

- we foster youth participation in community development and good governance.

KEY RESULT AREAS

Anti-Poverty and Empowerment of the Poor and Vulnerable

SECTOR OUTCOME

1. Increased contribution of, and benefit for the youth in the attainment of MDGs.

2. Improved enabling conditions for youth participation in governance, society and development.

3. Improved social protection through enabling policies and programs.

ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOME

Coordination of government actions for the development of the youth improved

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

KEY STRATEGIES

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

1. Policy advocacy

2. Partnership-building through programs,inter-agency support, media

3. Research

4. Provision of technical assistance / support

5. Communication, media, publicity

6. Institutional capacity

ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOMES (OOs) / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (PIs) BASELINE 2016 TARGETS

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Coordination of government actions for the development of the

youth improved

Percentage of youth aged 15-30 who have registered for 2016 Subject for special run by 10 % increase in 2016 compared

National and Local Elections COMELEC to 2013 (subject to availability

from COMELEC)

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT 473

Percentage of accomplishment of agencies' commitment to the 3% (or 1 national government 2015: 20% accomplished (or 7

Philippine Youth Development Plan agency) national government agencies)

2016: 30% accomplished (or 11 of

the total 36 national government

agencies)

Percentage increase in LGUs with Local Youth Development Plan 8% (or 6 provinces and 3 2015: 20% (or 16 provinces and 7

highly-urbanized cities) highly-urbanized cities)

2016: 30% (or 24 of all 80

provinces and 10 of all 33

highly-urbanized cities)

MAJOR FINAL OUTPUTS (MFOs) / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (PIs) 2016 Targets

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

MFO 1: YOUTH DEVELOPMENT POLICY ADVISORY AND ADVOCACY SERVICES

PI Set Description

No. of policy advisories provided 3

Average % of policy advisory recommendations rated by clients as good or better 80%

% of policy advisories updated within the last 2 years 50%

F. JUVENILE JUSTICE AND WELFARE COUNCIL

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

MANDATE

The Juvenile Justice and Welfare Council is a policy-making, coordinating and monitoring body on the implementation of the Juvenile

Justice and Welfare Act, through its members and coordinating agencies. (Revised IRR of RA 9344 as amended by RA 10630)

VISION

A Council leading a society that promotes and protects the rights of children at risk and children in conflict with the law under a

restorative justice and welfare system

MISSION

To institutionalize a restorative justice and welfare system for children at risk and children in conflict with the law through the

effective implementation of the law and coordination among stakeholders in a protective and enabling environment

KEY RESULT AREAS

Poverty reduction and empowerment of the poor and vulnerable

SECTOR OUTCOME

Prevent children at risk from committing crimes and ensure that children in conflict with the law are rehabilitated and reintegrated

with their families and communities

ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOME

Coordination of government actions for the implementation of the juvenile intervention programs and activities improved

473OFFICIAL GAZETTEDEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND DEPELOPMENT

Vol. 111, No. 1 December 29, 2015

474 GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT, FY 2016

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

KEY STRATEGIES

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

1. Policies, plans and program development

2. Advocacy and social mobilization

3. Research and data management

4. Technical assistance to agencies, LGUs and stakeholders

5. Coordinating, monitoring and evaluation

ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOMES (OOs) / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (PIs) BASELINE 2016 TARGETS

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Coordination of government actions for the implementation of

the juvenile intervention programs and activities improved

Resolutions brought to the Council versus the resolutions 5 15 resolutions shall be adopted

adopted and implemented

Percentage increase in local government units (LGUs) with local Provinces-30; 50 % increase in LGUs with

juvenile intervention programs and services juvenile intervention programs

integrated in local development

plans

Cities-82;

Municipalities-585;

Barangays-5,451

MAJOR FINAL OUTPUTS (MFOs) / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (PIs) 2016 Targets

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

MFO 1: RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND WELFARE POLICY SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AT RISK AND CHILDREN IN CONFLICT

WITH THE LAW

No. of national policies, plans and programs developed, issued, disseminated and updated 30

Average percentage of national plans and policies rated by stakeholders as good or better 75%

Average percentage of plans and policies developed, issued, disseminated and updated in the

last three years 25%

No. of LGUs with local juvenile intervention programs 10,145

Average percentage of local juvenile intervention programs integrated in local development and

investment plans 50%

Average percentage of local juvenile intervention programs formulated and implemented in the

last three years 10%

Vol. 111, No. 1 December 29, 2015474 OFFICIAL GAZETTEGENERAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT, FY 2016

Vol. 111, No. 1 December 29, 2015