Post on 03-Jul-2020
US Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District
Yuba River Ecosystem Restoration Section 905(b) Analysis
October 2014
Source: J.D. Richey
Thispageleftblankintentionally.
1
October2014SacramentoDistrict
SECTION905(b)(WRDA86)ANALYSISYUBARIVERECOSYSTEMRESTORATION
Introduction TheYubaRiverisoneofCalifornia’ssignaturerivers.SincetheGoldRush,priortoCaliforniastatehood,theYubaRiverhasbeenasourceoflife‐sustainingwaterfornativepeoples,farmersandranchers,aswellasforsalmon,steelheadandotherfishandwildlife.TheUnitedStatesArmyCorpsofEngineers(USACE)hasalonghistoryofinvolvementwiththeYubaRiver.WiththeadventoftheCaliforniagoldrushinthemid‐1800s,hydraulicminingwashedawayentiresectionsoftheupperYubaRiverWatershed.Thereleaseofincredibleamountsofsedimentandcontaminatedminingdebristhreatenednearbycities,farmsandtheriveritself.TheUnitedStatesCongressdirectedtheFederalCaliforniaDebrisCommission(CDC)tomanagethisdangerousminingsediment.In1906constructionwascompletedonDaguerrePointDam,andthenthe260‐foottallEnglebrightDamwascompletedin1941,bothtoimpoundminingdebris.Thesedamscontinuetocontainthiscontaminatedminingdebris,withanestimated28millioncubicyards(yd3)impoundedbehindEnglebrightDamand4millionyd3behindDaguerrePointDam.UponCongressionaldecommissioningoftheCDCin1986,administrationofDaguerrePointDamandEnglebrightDamandLakewasassumedbyUSACE. 1. StudyAuthorities
Ecosystemrestoration,orenvironmentalprotection,becameamissionofUSACEbytheWaterResourcesDevelopmentAct(WRDA)of1990,PublicLaw(P.L.)101‐640,Section306,whichreads:
(a) GENERALRULE.—TheSecretaryshallincludeenvironmentalprotectionasoneoftheprimarymissionsoftheCorpsofEngineersinplanning,designing,constructing,operating,andmaintainingwaterresourcesprojects.(b) LIMITATION.—Nothinginthissectionaffects—(1) existingCorpsofEngineers’authorities,includingitsauthoritieswithrespecttonavigationandfloodcontrol;(2) pendingCorpsofEngineerspermitapplicationsorpendinglawsuitsinvolvingpermitsorwaterresourcesprojects;or(3) theapplicationofpublicinterestreviewproceduresforCorpsofEngineerspermits.
WRDA1996,P.L.104‐303,Section210establishedcost‐sharingforecosystemprotection/restoration:
2
(a) InGeneral.‐‐Section103(c)oftheWaterResourcesDevelopmentActof1986(33U.S.C. (c);100Stat.4085)isamended‐‐
(1) bystriking``and''attheendofparagraph(5);(2) bystrikingtheperiodattheendofparagraph(6)andinserting``;and'';and(3) byinsertingafterparagraph(6)thefollowing:``(7)environmental
protectionandrestoration:35percent;exceptthatnothinginthisparagraphshallaffectorlimittheapplicabilityofsection906.''.
TheauthoritytostudytheSacramentoRiverBasinforfloodcontrolandalliedpurposes,includingecosystemrestoration,wasgrantedintheRiversandHarborsActof1962,P.L.87‐874,Section209,whichreads:
TheSecretaryoftheArmyisherebyauthorizedanddirectedtocausesurveysforfloodcontrolandalliedpurposes,includingchannelandmajordrainageimprovements,andfloodsaggravatedbyorduetowindortidaleffects,tobemadeunderthedirectionoftheChiefofEngineers,indrainageareasoftheUnitedStatesanditsterritorialpossessions,whichincludethefollowingnamedlocalities:Provided,thataftertheregularorformalreportsmadeonanysurveyaresubmittedtoCongress,nosupplementaloradditionalreportorestimateshallbemadeunlessauthorizedbylawexceptthattheSecretaryoftheArmymaycauseareviewofanyexaminationorsurveytobemadeandareportthereonsubmittedtoCongress,ifsuchreviewisrequiredbynationaldefenseorbychangedphysicaloreconomicconditions:Providedfurther,thattheGovernmentshallnotbedeemedtohaveentereduponanyprojectfortheimprovementofanywaterwayorharbormentionedinthistitleuntiltheprojectfortheproposedworkshallhavebeenadoptedbylaw:
SacramentoRiverBasinandstreamsinnorthernCaliforniadrainingintothePacificOceanforthepurposesofdeveloping,wherefeasible,multi‐purposewaterresourceprojects,particularlythosewhichwouldbeeligibleundertheprovisionsoftitleIIIofPublicLaw85‐500.
(TitleIIIofPublicLaw85‐500concernswatersupply.) TheauthoritytoreviewcompletedUSACEprojectswasgrantedintheFloodControlActof1970,P.L.91‐611,Section216,whichreads:
TheSecretaryoftheArmy,actingthroughtheChiefofEngineers,isauthorizedtoreviewtheoperationofprojectstheconstructionofwhichhasbeencompletedandwhichwereconstructedbytheCorpofEngineersintheinterestofnavigation,floodcontrol,watersupply,andrelatedpurposes,whenfoundadvisabledue(to)thesignificantlychangedphysicaloreconomicconditions,andtoreportthereontoCongresswithrecommendationsontheadvisabilityofmodifyingthestructuresortheiroperation,andforimprovingthequalityoftheenvironmentintheoverallpublicinterest.
UnderSection216authority,theUnitedStatesArmyCorpsofEngineersSacramentoDistrictpreparedanInitialAppraisalReport(IAR)in2005.Thereportrecommendeda
3
cost‐sharedfeasibilitystudytodeterminetheFederalinterestinfishpassageimprovement,restorationoffisheries,restorationofaquatichabitat,andflooddamagereductionassociatedwithDaguerrePointDam.(DaguerrePointDamprovideslimitedfloodriskmanagementbycreatingabackwatereffectintheriver,whichcausessomefloodwaterstoflowoutandbedetainedintheGoldfields.)AContinuingAuthoritiesProgram(CAP)Section1135studywasnotrecommendedbecausealternativecoststoaddressaquaticecosystemproblemsalongtheYubaRiverwereexpectedtoexceedtheCAPlimit. TheEnergyandWaterDevelopmentAppropriationsAct,2014,DivisionDofPublicLaw113‐76,theConsolidatedAppropriationsAct,2014initiatedthereconnaissancestudy:
ThattheSecretarymayinitiateuptobutnomorethanninenewreconnaissancestudystartsduringfiscalyear2014:Providedfurther,Thatthenewreconnaissancestudystartswillconsistofthreestudieswherethemajorityofthebenefitsarederivedfromnavigationtransportationsavings,threestudieswherethemajorityofthebenefitsarederivedfromfloodandstormdamagereduction,andthreestudieswherethemajorityofthebenefitsarederivedfromenvironmentalrestoration:Providedfurther,Thatthenumberofenvironmentalrestorationstudiesselectedshallbelimitedtonomorethanthelessor(sic)ofthenumberofnavigationstudiesorthenumberoffloodandstormdamagereductionstudiesselected:Providedfurther,ThattheSecretaryshallnotdeviatefromthenewstartsproposedintheworkplan…
TheAct’saccompanyingStatementofManagersreportdesignatedspecifiedprograms,projects,andactivities.BasedonthecategoriesandcriteriaprovidedintheStatementofManagers,USACEidentifiedstudiesinthe2014WorkPlan.OneofthosestudieswastheYubaRiverEcosystemRestorationstudy,listedasYubaRiverFishPassage,California(EnglebrightandDaguerrePointDams). 2. StudyPurpose
ThepurposeofaSection905(b)analysis,alsoknownasareconnaissancereport,istoaddresstherequirementsofSection905(b)oftheWaterResourcesDevelopmentAct(WRDA)of1986,asamended.Thepurposeofthis905(b)analysisistodeterminewhetherthereisaFederalinterestinparticipatinginacost‐sharedfeasibilitystudytoinvestigateecosystemrestorationintheYubaRiverwatershedintheinterestofwaterresourcedevelopmentopportunities.TheanalysisusesexistingdatatodetermineFederalinterest,developpreliminarycostsandbenefits,andestimatethecostofpreparingthefeasibilityreport.Additionally,perPlanningBulletin2014‐02:SMARTPlanningintheReconnaissancePhase,theanalysisdescribesareasofriskandremaininguncertaintiesthataffectfeasibility‐phaseassumptions.Theanalysisincludesadescriptionoftheexistingproblem(s)intheYubaRiverwatershed,identificationofFederalinterest,andpotentialsolution(s)thatwouldresultinapolicy‐consistentstudywithawillingandcapablesponsor.ThesponsorforthefeasibilitystudyistheYubaCountyWaterAgency(YCWA). 3. Recommendation/FindingofFederalInterest
BasedonconsistencywithArmyandbudgetarypoliciesandthelikelihoodofaproject
4
meetingcriteriaforFederalparticipationinimplementation,theSacramentoDistrictrecommendscontinuingwithafeasibilitystudy.ThereisFederalinterestinproceedingtothefeasibilityphaseofthisstudytofurtheranalyzeandevaluateecosystemrestorationintheYubaRiverwatershed.PreliminarydataindicatethattherearesignificantNationalEcosystemRestoration(NER)benefitsassociatedwithrestorationofstructures,functions,andprocessesintheYubaRiver.Federalinterestinecosystemrestorationisbasedonthenationalsignificanceoftheecosystemresources.ThesignificantresourceswithintheYubaRiverwatershedarespring‐runChinooksalmonandsteelheadtrout.Significanceiscomposedofinstitutionalsignificance,technicalsignificance,orpublicsignificance.
� Institutionalsignificancemeansthattheimportanceofanecosystemresourceisacknowledgedinthelaws,adoptedplans,andotherpolicystatementsofpublicagencies,tribes,orprivategroups.IntheYubaRiver,therearecurrentlythreefishspecieslistedasthreatenedundertheESA:1)spring‐runChinooksalmon;2)steelhead;and3)greensturgeon.ThelowerYubaRiverisdesignatedcriticalhabitatforeachofthesespecies.TheJuly2014NOAAFisheries“RecoveryPlanforSacramentoRiverwinter‐runChinooksalmon,CentralValleyspring‐runChinooksalmon,andCentralValleysteelhead”seekstorecovertheseecologicalvalues.In1998,theEcosystemRestorationProgramPlanofCALFEDrecommendedaprogramtoevaluatethefeasibilityofreturningsteelheadandspring‐runChinooksalmontotheUpperYubaRiverupstreamofEnglebrightDam.Spring‐runChinooksalmonarealsolistedasthreatenedundertheStateofCalifornia’sEndangeredSpeciesAct.TheYubaAccordFisheriesAgreement,whichprovidesassurancesthatinstreamflowswillbemaintainedforthebenefitoffishspecies,isanotherexampleofaformalplan.TheStateofCalifornia’sSalmon,SteelheadTrout,andAnadromousFisheriesProgramActof1988statesthatitisapolicyoftheStatetosignificantlyincreasethenaturalproductionofsalmonandsteelhead.SierraCounty,throughwhichtheNorthYubaflows,statesinElement13ofitsGeneralPlanthat,“ItistheCounty’sgoaltoprotectanddefenditsabundantanddiverseplantandanimalspecies.”
� Technicalsignificancemeansthattheimportanceofecosystemresourcesisbasedon
thescientificortechnicalknowledgeorjudgmentofcriticalresourcecharacteristics.TechnicalsignificanceisshownbecausetheESAlistingofspring‐runChinooksalmonandsteelheadisbasedonscientificandtechnicalknowledgeandiswell‐documentedinscientificliterature.
� Publicsignificancemeansthatsomesegmentofthegeneralpublicrecognizesthe
importanceofanecosystemresource.MembersofthepublichaveformedorganizationsbasedontheirinterestinfishingandthecontinuationofsalmonidpopulationsintheYubaRiver.OnesuchorganizationisSYRCL;theirYubaSalmonNowcampaignaimstorestoresalmonhabitatinthelowerYubaRiverandultimatelygetsalmonpastEnglebrightDamintotheupperYubaRiver.AnotherorganizationisAmericanRivers;in2011,theynamedtheYubaasoneofAmerica’sMostEndangeredRivers,primarilybecauseofthelackoffishpassage.
This905(b)analysisincludesadescriptionoftheexistingproblems,evidenceofFederal
5
interest,acommitmentfromwillingandcapablesponsors,andthatthereisstrongpotentialtoimplementaviableecosystemrestorationstudy.ThefeasibilityreportwillbecompletedinaccordancewithSMARTplanningprinciplesandrisk‐informeddecision‐making. 4. StudyArea
TheYubaRiverWatershed(Figure1)encompasses1,340squaremilesonthewesternslopesoftheSierraNevadaMountainRange,andislocatedinportionsofSierra,Placer,Yuba,andNevadacounties(Reynoldsetal.1993).TheYubaRiverisatributaryoftheFeatherRiverwhich,inturn,flowsintotheSacramentoRivernearthetownofVerona,California.TheYubaRiverflowsthroughforest,foothillchaparral,andagriculturallands.Leveesareabsentfrommostofitscourseexceptforneartheriver’sconfluencewiththeFeatherRiver.Atthatpoint,theYubaRiverisboundedbysetbackleveesforapproximatelysixmiles.
6
Figure1.StudyAreaMap(nottoscale).
7
TheprimarywatercoursesoftheupperYubaRiverWatershedaretheSouth,Middle,andNorthYubarivers.TheSouthYubariverflowsintoEnglebrightLake.TheMiddleYubaRiverflowsintotheNorthYubaRiverandtogethertheyarereferredtoastheupperYubaRiver.BeginningattheconfluenceoftheNorthYubaandtheMiddleYubarivers,themainstemupperYubaRiverflowsapproximately7.8milesdownstreamtoEnglebrightDam.EnglebrightDam’sreservoirextendsapproximately8milesfromitshighwatersurfaceelevationatRM32.2totheEnglebrightDamatRM24(YSF2013).BelowEnglebrightDam,thelowerYubaRiverreachextendsapproximatelyanadditional24milesdownstreamtotheconfluencewiththeFeatherRiver.ThestudyareabeginsinthecityofMarysvilleandextendsupstreamapproximately90miles,pastSierraCity,California,inSierraCounty.Figure2.EnglebrightDam.
Source:USGeologicalSurveyDaguerrePointDamislocatedonthelowerYubaRiverapproximately11.5rivermiles(RM)upstreamfromtheconfluenceofthelowerYubaandlowerFeatherriversnearMarysville(USACE2013).OwnedbyUSACE,DaguerrePointDamisa25feet(ft)tall,low‐headdamacrossthelowerYubaRiverandthereisnoreservoirassociatedwiththedam.EnglebrightDam,locatedapproximately12.3milesupstreamofDaguerrePointDam,isa260‐fttallconcretedamalsoownedbyUSACE.LocatedontheYubaRiverapproximately18milesupstreamofEnglebrightDam,the645fthighNewBullardsBarDam(ownedbyYCWA)isthetallestman‐madestructureintheYubaRiverWatershed.
8
Figure3.DaguerrePointDam.
Source:USACE
Figure4.NewBullardsBarDam.
Source:Trails.comAquaticandRiparianHabitatAccordingtotheNationalMarineFisheriesService(NMFS)andnumerousstudies,atleast80%ofhistoricriparianhabitathasbeenlostintheWesternUnitedStates(NMFS2014;Krueper1993).RiparianhabitatssupportthegreatestdiversityofwildlifespeciesofanyhabitattypeinCalifornia(CALFED2000ascitedinRMT2013).Riparianhabitatislinkedtoaquatichabitatbothbyfloodwatersaswellasbeingasourceofinvertebrateprey,temperature‐controllingshade,andstructuralrefugeintheformoflargewoodydebris(CDFW2010).TheYubaRiverflowsthrougharuralarea,sourbandevelopmenthasnotcontributedtohabitatloss.However,habitatalongportionsoftheYubaRiverisreducedduetopastminingpracticesanddamconstruction.AlthoughtheamountofhabitatalongthelowerYubaRiverhasbeenalteredfrompristineconditions,ithasbeenassessedashealthyandrecoveringfromhistoricaldisturbance(YCWA2013).
9
RiparianvegetationalongthelowerYubaRiveriscomposedlargelyofwillowshrubs,cottonwoodandotherhardwoodspecies,withasimpleunderstoryofHimalayanblackberryorblueelderberryshrubs(YCWA2013).FieldobservationsreportedthatwoodyspeciesinvariouslifestagesarepresentthroughoutthelowerYubaRiver.IntheupperpartoftheYubaRiverwatershed,aldersandquakingaspenbecomemorecommon,inadditiontocottonwoodsandwillows(Potter2005).Riparianhabitatinboththelowerandhigherelevationssupportsthelittlewillowflycatcher(Empidonaxtrailliibrewsterii),aCaliforniaendangeredsubspeciesofwillowflycatchers(USFS2014).Whereasriparianhabitatgenerallybordersriversandstreams,aquatichabitatiscomposedoftheplantsandanimalswithinthewater.FortheYubaRiver,fishspeciesincludeChinooksalmon,steelhead,greensturgeon,Sacramentopikeminnow(Ptychocheilusgrandis),commoncarp(Cyprinuscarpio),Sacramentosucker(Catostomusoccidentalis),channelcatfish(Ictaluruspunctatus),brownbullhead(Ictalurusnebulosus),bluegill(Lepomismacrochirus),andgreensunfish(Lepomiscyanellus).Thesespeciesdependoncleanwateroftheappropriatetemperature,adequatedissolvedoxygen,appropriatestreambedsubstrate,food,andareastorest. BecauseofthemountainsnowmeltandcoldwateroutflowsfromNewBullardsBarDam,theYubaRiverissuitableforcold‐waterfishspeciessuchassalmonidsandtrout.NMFSdesignatedtheYubaRiverfromMarysvilletoEnglebrightDamascriticalhabitatforspring‐runChinooksalmonandsteelhead.IntheCentralValleyofCalifornia,anestimated72%ofthehistoricChinooksalmonspawningandholdinghabitatisnolongeravailable(Yoshiyamaetal.2001).TheamountofsteelheadhabitatlostisprobablymuchhigherthanthatforChinooksalmon,becausesteelheadweremoreextensivelydistributedinthepast(NMFS2014).Manyoftheselossesarefromurbandevelopment,agriculture,andwatersupplyfacilities. HistoricalGoldMiningExtensivehydraulicminingoccurredintheYubaRiverwatershedduringthelate1800s.Inhydraulicmining,watercannonsshothigh‐pressureflowsouttowashawayhillsides.Thematerialthatwasdislodgedwasthensluicedtoexposethegold.Gilbert(1917),ascitedinYoshiyamaetal.(2001),estimatedthat“…duringtheperiod1849‐1909,684millioncubicyardsofgravelanddebrisduetohydraulicminingwerewashedintotheYubaRiversystem–morethantriplethevolumeofearthexcavatedduringtheconstructionofthePanamaCanal.”BeakConsultants,Inc.(1989)stated,“thedebrisplainrangedfromapproximately700feetwideandupto150feetthickneartheedgeofthefoothillstonearly3mileswideand26feettallnearMarysville.”Thisdebrisfieldisstillminedforresidualgolddepositsandgravel.HydraulicminingintheYubaRiveraccountedfor40percentofalltheminingdebristhatwashedintotheCentralValley(Mount1995).Inadditiontoeliminatingmuchoftheriparianvegetationcorridor(eitherbyburyingit,byretardingitsregeneration,orbyitsuseasrawmaterialforconstructingbrushdamstocontainsediment)alongthelowerYubaRiver(NMFS2005),thehydraulicminingdebrisprobablyhaddevastatingimpactsonsalmonids.Thisisbecausethesedimentsinthedebris
10
wouldhavesuffocatedincubatingeggsandpre‐emergentfry(NMFS2002).Evenbythe1870sand1880s,theYubaRiversalmonrunshadbeengreatlydiminishedbyhydraulicminingdebriseffects(Yoshiyamaetal.2001).Historically,theYubaRiverWatershedsupportedlargenumbersofspring‐runChinooksalmon,fall‐runChinooksalmon,andsteelhead,andwasamajorcontributortoanadromoussalmonidsstocksintheCentralValleyofCalifornia.Lossofhistoricspawningandrearinghabitatintheupperbasinlikelyhadparticularlysevereimpactsonspring‐runChinooksalmonandsteelheadpopulations,whichdependedontheupperbasinforsuccessfulsummerholdingandrearing(Yoshiyamaetal.1998;2001). Alongwithhydraulicmining,mercurywasusedtoprocessgolddeposits.AccordingtotheUSGeologicalSurvey,hundredsofpoundsofliquidmercurywereaddedtothetypicalsluicebox.Goldsanktothebottomofthesluice,whilesandandgravelpassedoverthehigh‐densitymercury,allowinggoldtoseparateandsinktothebottom.IntheSierraNevada,upto9millionpoundsofmercurywerelostinthismannertotheenvironment(Churchill2000).IntheYubaRiverstudyarea,muchofthisleftovermercuryiscontainedinsedimentheldbehindthedebrisdams.Althoughmostofthemercuryisnotbiologicallyavailable,enoughhasmethylizedinEnglebrightLakethatitisbioaccumulatinginthelargerpredatoryfish.MercurylevelsinthelargerpredatoryfisharehighenoughthattheCaliforniaOfficeofEnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessmentissuedasafe‐eatingadvisoryforEnglebrightLake.Guidelinesadvisewomenages18‐45andchildrenages1‐17toavoideatinglargemouth,smallmouth,orspottedbass.TheYubaGoldfields,locatedfromapproximately8to16milesupstreamofMarysville,aredominatedbyapproximately20,000acresofdredgertailingsthatwerereworkedfromhydraulicminewaste.DredgingofgoldfromthehydraulicwasteintheGoldfieldsbeganin1902,andby1910,15dredgeswereoperatinginthelowerYubaRiver.Theareahasbeendredgedandre‐dredgedintermittentlythroughouttheyears,anddredgingcontinuestoday.Figure5.YubaGoldfields.
Source:ENGEOHydraulicminingresultedintorrentsofsedimentbeingtransporteddownslopetothevalley
11
andcausedrapidaggradationandexacerbationoffloodingalongvalleyrivers,includingthelowerYubaRiver(JamesandSinger2008).Twomajordebrisdams(i.e.,DaguerrePointDamin1906andEnglebrightDamin1941)wereconstructedontheYubaRivertopreventcontinuingmovementofsedimentintotheFeatherandSacramentorivers,andultimatelytheBay‐Delta.Dams Duringthelate1800sandearly1900s,developmentoftheupperYubaRiverWatershedforhydropowerandwatersupplywasinprogress.Mostofthedamsanddiversionsthatwereusedprimarilyforgoldminingwereinplaceduringthisperiod,buttheywerebeingreplacedorremovedasdevelopmentalemphasisinthewatershedshiftedfromgoldminingtofloodcontrol,watersupplyandhydropowergeneration.Debrisdamsalsowereinplaceorbeingaddedatseverallocationsthroughoutthemiddletolowerelevationsofthewatershed.Thepresence,operationandmaintenanceofdamscanhinderorprecludefishaccesstoupstreamsub‐basins,whichhistoricallyprovidedholding,spawning,incubationandrearinghabitats(NMFS2014a).Inadditiontotheeffectsofharvest,hatcheries,predation,andhabitatdegradation,theeffectsofhydropowerdamsandotherwaterandsedimentcontrolfacilitieshavecontributedtothesignificantdeclineofCentralValleysalmonsincethemid‐1800s,includingtheYubaRiver(NMFS2014).Althoughother,smallerdamsarepresentinthewatershed,EnglebrightDamisthefirstbarriertosalmonids,whileNewBullardsBardamisthesecondontheNorthYuba.Asdocumentedinthe2013biologicalassessmentonDaguerrePointDam,USACEimplementedprotectiveandvoluntaryconservationmeasuresforlistedspeciesunderitsobligationtoSection7(a)(1)oftheEndangeredSpeciesActandseveralvoluntaryconservationmeasuresinaccordancewithUSACE’sEnvironmentalStewardshipandMaintenanceGuidanceandProcedures,respectively.USACEisincompliancewiththeEndangeredSpeciesAct.
4.1. SpeciesAddressedbytheSection905(b)Analysis Detaileddescriptionsofthefishspecies,includingtheirlifehistoriesandhabitatutilizationintheYubaRiver,areprovidedintheBiologicalAssessmentaddressingtheOperationsandMaintenanceofExistingFishPassageFacilitiesatDaguerrePointDam(USACE2013).MuchofthatinformationwasbasedupontheYubaAccordRiverManagementTeam(RMT)2013reportonthefishresourcesofthelowerYubaRiverthroughreviewofpreviouslyconductedstudies,aswellasrecentandcurrentlyongoingdatacollectionactivitiesoftheirMonitoringandEvaluation(M&E)Program.Briefdescriptionsareprovidedbelowforcontextinthisanalysis.Spring‐runChinookSalmon(Oncorhynchustshawytscha)ListingStatusandCriticalHabitatOnSeptember16,1999,NMFSlistedtheCentralValleyEvolutionarilySignificantUnit(ESU)ofspring‐runChinooksalmonasa“threatened”speciesundertheESA(64FR50394).In
12
August2011,NMFScompleteda5‐yearstatusreviewofthespring‐runChinooksalmonESU.Basedonareviewoftheavailableinformation,NMFS(2011a)recommendedthatthespring‐runChinooksalmonESUremainclassifiedasathreatenedspecies.NMFS’reviewalsoindicatesthatthebiologicalstatusoftheESUhasdeclinedsincethepreviousstatusreviewin2005.CriticalhabitatwasdesignatedfortheCentralValleyspring‐runChinooksalmonESUonSeptember2,2005(70FR52488).OntheYubaRiver,criticalhabitatisdesignatedfromtheconfluencewiththeFeatherRiverupstreamtoEnglebrightDam.Thedamblocksallupstreampassage,however,theCentralValleyspring‐runChinooksalmonESUcanswimupstreamofDaguerrePointDambyusingthefishladders.LifeHistoryandHabitatUtilizationAdultImmigrationandHoldingSpring‐runChinooksalmonpreviouslyhavebeenreportedtomigrateimmediatelytoareasupstreamoftheHighway20BridgeafterenteringtheYubaRiverfromMarchthroughOctober(VogelandMarine1991;YCWAetal.2007),andthenover‐summerindeeppoolslocateddownstreamoftheNarrows1and2powerhouses,orfurtherdownstreamintheNarrowsReachthroughthereportedspawningperiodofSeptemberthroughNovember(CDFG1991a;SWRCB2003).TheresultsfromtheRMT’sM&EProgram,includingtheVAKIRiverwatcher™monitoringandparticularlythethree‐yearacoustictelemetrystudy,foundpastcharacterizationsoftemporalandspatialdistributionstobelargelyunsupported.Taggedphenotypicadultspring‐runChinooksalmoninthelowerYubaRiveractuallymigratedupstreamofDaguerrePointDamfromMaythroughSeptember,andutilizedabroadexpanseofthelowerYubaRiverduringthesummerholdingperiod,includingareasasfardownstreamasSimpsonLaneBridge(i.e.,~RM3.2),andasfarupstreamastheareajustbelowEnglebrightDam.Themajorityoftaggedspring‐runChinooksalmonweredetectedintheplungepoollocatedimmediatelydownstreamofDaguerrePointDamfromtheonsetoftagginginMay/June,throughtheover‐summerholdingperiodaslateasSeptember.PeriodsofoccupationintheDaguerrePointDampoolduringthestudyrangedfrom0to116days.Therearenodefinitiveexplanationsforthisobservation,butitispossiblethatDaguerrePointDamrepresentedapassageimpediment,orthatthesefishover‐summeredintheDaguerrePointDampoolduetosuitablehabitatconditionsavailablebelowthedam(e.g.,favorablewaterdepths,cover,watertemperaturesandproximitytospawninggravels).Chinooksalmonpassagewasobservedoveravarietyofflowconditions.FlowthresholdsprohibitingpassageofChinooksalmonthroughtheladdersatDaguerrePointDamwerenotapparentinthedata.NMFS(2007)statedthatwhenhighflowconditionsoccurduringwinterandspring,adultspring‐runChinooksalmonandsteelheadcanexperiencedifficultyinfindingtheentrancestotheladdersbecauseoftherelativelylowamountofattractionflowsexitingthefishladders,comparedtothemagnitudeofthesheet‐flowspillingoverthetopofDaguerrePointDam.Inaddition,NMFS(2007)statedthattheanglesofthefishladderentrance
13
orificesandtheirproximitiestotheplungepoolalsoincreasethedifficultyforfishtofindtheentrancestotheladders.AdultSpawningandEmbryoIncubationThespring‐runChinooksalmonspawningperiodinthelowerYubaRiver,baseduponRMTinvestigations,extendsfromapproximatelySeptember1throughmid‐October.Theearliestspawning(presumedtobespring‐runChinooksalmon)generallyoccursintheupperreachesofthehighestqualityspawninghabitat(i.e.,belowtheNarrowspool)andprogressivelymovesdownstream.Thisspatialtrendreflectscoolerwatertemperaturesextendingfartherdownstreamasthespawningseasonprogresses(RMT2013).Spring‐runChinooksalmonspawninginthelowerYubaRiverisbelievedtooccurupstreamofDaguerrePointDam.WiththeexceptionoftheEnglebrightDamReach,thereisanabundanceofsuitablespawninggravelinthelowerYubaRiver.JuvenileRearingandOutmigrationSnorkelobservationsconductedbytheRMT(2013)indicatethatthedensityofjuvenileChinooksalmonwashighlyvariablethroughoutthelowerYubaRiveralthough,withtheexceptionoftheupstream‐mostsurveyreach(i.e.,EnglebrightDamReach)thedensityofjuvenileChinooksalmongenerallywashigherinthesurveyreacheslocatedupstreamratherthandownstreamofDaguerrePointDam.Theseobservationsareconsistentwithpreviousreports,indicatingthat.juvenileChinooksalmoncollectedbyelectrofishingandobservedbysnorkelingexhibithigherabundancesaboveDaguerrePointDam(Beak1989;CDFG1991;Kozlowski2004).Thismaybeduetolargernumbersofspawners,greateramountsofmorecomplex,high‐qualitycover,andlowerdensitiesofpredatorssuchasstripedbass(Moronesaxatilis)andAmericanshad(Alosasapidissima),whichreportedlyaregenerallyrestrictedtoareasbelowDaguerrePointDam(YCWAetal.2007).TheRMT(2013)reportedthatjuvenileChinooksalmonappearedtooccupyareasincloseproximitytotheshoreduringmostsurveymonthsandinmostsurveyreaches.TheoverallfindingsindicatethatjuvenileChinooksalmoninthelowerYubaRiverinitiallypreferslower,shallowerhabitat,andmoveintofasteranddeeperwaterastheygrow.EmigrationRecentRotaryScrewTram(RST)monitoringdataindicatethatthevastmajorityofspring‐runChinooksalmonemigrateaspost‐emergentfryduringNovemberandDecember.Overall,most(approximately84%)ofthejuvenileChinooksalmonwerecapturedattheHallwoodBoulevardRSTssoonafteremergencefromNovemberthroughFebruary,withrelativelysmallnumberscontinuingtobecapturedthroughJune.Althoughnotnumerous,capturesof(over‐summer)holdoverjuvenileChinooksalmonprimarilyoccurredfromOctoberthroughJanuarywithafewindividualscapturedintoMarch(Massa2005;MassaandMcKibbin2005).Thesefishlikelyrearedintheriverovertheprevioussummer,representinganextendedjuvenilerearingstrategycharacteristicofspring‐runChinooksalmon(RMT2013).
14
Figure6.Chinooksalmon.
Steelhead(O.mykiss)Steelheadexhibitsperhapsthemostcomplexsuiteoflife‐historytraitsofanyspeciesofPacificsalmonid.Membersofthisspeciescanbeanadromousorfreshwaterresidentsand,undersomecircumstances,membersofoneformcanapparentlyyieldoffspringofanotherform(YCWA2010).ListingStatusandCriticalHabitatOnMarch19,1998(63FR13347)NMFSlistedtheCaliforniaCentralValleysteelheadESUas“threatened”.OnJanuary5,2006NMFSissuedafinaldecisionthatdefinedCentralValleysteelheadasaDistinctPopulationSegment(DPS)ratherthananESU,andretainedthestatusofCentralValleysteelheadasthreatened(71FR834).InAugust2011,NMFScompleteda5‐yearstatusreviewoftheCentralValleysteelheadDPS,indicatedthatthebiologicalstatusoftheDPShasdeclinedsincethepreviousstatusreviewin2005,andrecommendedthatthesteelheadDPSremainclassifiedasathreatenedspecies.OnFebruary16,2000(65FR7764),NMFSdesignatedcriticalhabitatforCentralValleysteelheadincludingthelowerYubaRiverupstreamtoEnglebrightDam.NMFSpublishedafinalruledesignatingcriticalhabitatforsteelheadonSeptember2,2005(70FR52488),whichagainincludestheYubaRiverfromtheconfluencewiththelowerFeatherRiverupstreamtoEnglebrightDam.LifeHistoryandHabitatUtilizationAdultImmigrationandHoldingRMT(2010;2013)examinedpreliminarydataandidentifiedvariableannualtimingofO.mykissascendingthefishladdersatDaguerrePointDamsincetheVAKIRiverwatcher™beganoperationsin2003.TheyidentifiedtheperiodextendingfromAugustthroughMarchasencompassingthemajorityoftheupstreammigrationandholdingofadultsteelheadinthelowerYubaRiver.AdultSpawningandEmbryoIncubationSteelheadspawninggenerallyoccursinthelowerYubaRiverfromJanuarythroughApril(RMT2013).RMT(2013)reportedthatsteelheadredds(eggbeds)showadistinctive
15
patternspatiallythroughoutthelowerYubaRiver,withthemajorityofreddsintheupperreaches(TimbuctooBendandParksBar)ofthelowerYubaRiver.InthelowerYubaRiver,steelheadhavebeenobservedtospawninsidechannelareasaswellasinmainstemareas(YCWAunpublisheddata).JuvenileRearingandOutmigrationSomejuvenileO.mykissmayrearinthelowerYubaRiverforshortperiods(uptoafewmonths)andexhibitdownstreammovementfromAprilthroughSeptember.Othersmayspendfromonetothreeyearsrearingintheriver.MostjuvenilesteelheadrearingreportedlyoccursaboveDaguerrePointDam,withdecreasingabundancedownstreamofDaguerrePointDam.SWRIetal.(2000)suggestedthathigherabundancesofjuvenileO.mykissaboveDaguerrePointDammayhavebeenduetolargernumbersofspawners,greateramountsofmorecomplex,highqualitycover,andlowerdensitiesofpredatorssuchasstripedbassandAmericanshad,whichreportedlywererestrictedtoareasbelowDaguerrePointDam.SmoltEmigrationAlthoughnotnumerous,capturesof(over‐summer)holdoverjuvenileO.mykisswereobservedintheRSTcapturesprimarilyfromOctoberthroughmid‐April(RMT2013).Thesefishlikelyrearedintheriverovertheprevioussummer,representinganextendedjuvenilerearingstrategycharacteristicofholdoverjuvenileO.mykiss.JuvenileO.mykissthatexhibitextendedrearinginthelowerYubaRiverareassumedtoundergothesmoltificationprocessandvolitionallyemigratefromtheriver,andarereferredtoasyearling+smolts.Figure7.Steelhead.
Source:OregonDFWFall‐runChinooksalmon(O.tshawytscha)ListingStatusCentralValleyfall‐andlatefall‐runChinooksalmonareconsideredbyNMFStobethesameESU(64FR50394).NMFSdeterminedin1999thatlistingthisESUasathreatenedspecieswasnotwarranted(64FR50394),butsubsequentlyclassifiedthisESUasaFederalSpeciesofConcernbecauseofspecificriskfactors,includingpopulationsizeandhatcheryinfluencein2004(69FR19975).IntheCentralValley,fall‐runChinooksalmonarethemostnumerousofthefoursalmonruns,andcontinuetosupportcommercialandrecreationalfisheriesofsignificanteconomic
16
importance.Becauseoftheircommercialimportance,allruns(spring‐andfall‐runChinooksalmon)ofChinooksalmonandtheirdesignatedEssentialFishHabitat(EFH)aremanagedundertheMagnuson‐StevensFisheryConservationandManagementAct(MSA).IntheYubaRiverBasin,EFHisdesignatedupstreamanddownstreamofEnglebrightDamandReservoir.LifeHistoryandHabitatUtilizationAdultImmigrationandStagingUnlikespring‐runChinooksalmon,adultfall‐runChinooksalmondonotexhibitanextendedover‐summerholdingperiodinthelowerYubaRiver(RMT2010).Rather,itisbelievedthattheystageforarelativelyshortperiodoftimepriortospawning,assupportedbytherecentevaluationbytheRMToftheacoustictelemetrymonitoringdataandtheVAKIRiverwatcher™data(RMT2013).Bycontrasttophenotypicadultspring‐runChinooksalmon,whichexhibitedextendedperiodsofholdingdownstreamofDaguerrePointDam,RMT(2013)foundthattheacoustically‐taggedfall‐runadultChinooksalmonheldforanaverageofonlyapproximately3daysdownstreamofDaguerrePointDampriortopassingupstreamthroughthefishladders.SpawningandEmbryoIncubationAccordingtoRMT(2010),fall‐runChinooksalmonareprimarilyobservedspawningduringOctoberintheupperreachesofthelowerYubaRiverupstreamofDaguerrePointDam.Spawningfall‐runChinooksalmonbeginexpandingtheirspatialdistributionfurtherdownstreaminlaterfallmonthsassuitabletemperaturesbecomeavailablenearordownstreamofDaguerrePointDam(RMT2010).JuvenileRearingandDownstreamMovementInthelowerYubaRiver,mostfall‐runChinooksalmonreportedlyexhibitdownstreammovementasfryshortlyafteremergencefromgravels,althoughsomeindividualsrearintheriverforaperioduptoseveralmonthsandmovedownstreamasjuveniles(RMT2010).BaseduponRMT(2013)datareview,thephenotypicfall‐runChinooksalmonfryrearingperiodgenerallyextendsfrommid‐DecemberthroughApril,andthejuvenilerearinglifestageextendsfrommid‐JanuarythroughJune.Juveniledownstreammovement,whichincludesbothfryandlargerjuvenilesasindicatedbycapturesintheHallwoodBoulevardRSTs,generallyoccursfrommid‐DecemberthroughJune.GreenSturgeon(Acipensermedirostris)ListingStatusandCriticalHabitatTheSouthernDPSofNorthAmericangreensturgeon(Acipensermedirostrus)waslistedasaFederallythreatenedspeciesonApril7,2006(71FR17757)andincludesthegreensturgeonpopulationspawningintheSacramentoRiverandutilizingtheSacramento‐SanJoaquinRiverDelta,andSanFranciscoEstuary.OnOctober9,2009,NMFS(74FR52300)designatedcriticalhabitatfortheSouthernDPSofNorthAmericangreensturgeon.CriticalhabitatinthelowerYubaRiverincludesthestream
17
channelstotheordinaryhighwaterlineextendingfromtheconfluencewiththemainstemFeatherRiverupstreamtoDaguerrePointDam.LifeHistoryandHabitatUtilizationSincethe1970s,numeroussurveysofthelowerYubaRiverdownstreamofEnglebrightDamhavebeenconducted,includingannualsalmoncarcasssurveys,snorkelsurveys,beachseining,electrofishing,rotaryscrewtrapping,reddsurveys,andothermonitoringandevaluationactivities.Althoughnotspecificallydesignedforgreensturgeon,overthemanyyearsofthesesurveysandmonitoringofthelowerYubaRiver,onlyoneconfirmedobservationofanadultgreensturgeonhasoccurredpriorto2011.Ofthethreeadultorsub‐adultsturgeonobservedbysnorkelingintheYubaRiverbelowDaguerrePointDamduring2006,onlyonewasconfirmedtobeagreensturgeon.AspartofongoingsturgeonmonitoringeffortsintheFeatherRiverBasinundertheAnadromousFishRestorationProgram(AFRP),rovingunderwatervideosurveyswereconductedinthelowerYubaRiver.DuringlateMay2011,underwatervideographicmonitoringobserved4‐5greensturgeonnearthecenterofthechannelattheedgeofthebubblecurtainbelowDaguerrePointDam.During2012and2013,underwatervideographyalsowasusedinanattempttodocumentthepresenceofgreensturgeondownstreamofDaguerrePointDam,butnoobservationsofgreensturgeonweremade.BecausegreensturgeonhaverarelybeenobservedinthelowerYubaRiver,nosite‐specifichabitatutilizationinformationisavailable.However,DaguerrePointDamisacknowledgedtobeimpassibletogreensturgeon.Figure8.GreenSturgeon.
Source:CADFWCaliforniaRed‐LeggedFrog(Ranadraytonii)AnotherthreatenedspeciesthathashistorichabitatinthestudyareaistheCaliforniaRed‐LeggedFrog(CRLF)(Ranadraytonii).CRLFhistoricallyoccupiedportionsofthewesternslopeoftheSierraNevada,butpopulationshavebeenfragmentedandnearlyeliminateddueinlargeparttohabitatlosscausedbyagriculture,floodinfrastructure,andurbandevelopment.Suchhumanactionsledtothelossofstreamsandwetlands.ThelastsightingsoftheCRLFinYubaCountyoccurredinthe1960sandwerenorthofthestudyarea,alongtheNorthandSouthForksoftheFeatherRiver.
18
Figure9.CaliforniaRed‐LeggedFrog.
5. SummaryofApplicablePriorStudies,Reports,andExistingWaterProjects
5.1. WaterProjects
5.1.1.Sacramento‐SanJoaquinDeltaTheDeltaisavast,low‐lyinginlandregionlocatedeastoftheSanFranciscoBayArea,attheconfluenceoftheSacramentoandSanJoaquinRivers.TheDeltaisacomplexareathatisimportanttoestuarinespecies,includinganadromousfish,agriculture,andproductionanddistributionofCaliforniawaterresources.TheCentralValleyProject,managedbytheUSBureauofReclamation,andtheStateWaterProjectstorewaterandtransferitfromthenorthernpartofthestatetothedriersouthernpart.WhilewaterdrawnfromtheDeltaprovidesformuchofCalifornia'swaterneeds,includingdrinkingwaterandagriculturalirrigation,fishareimpactedbythedistributionfacilities.Thefacilities,mainlypumpsandwaterpulledtowardthepumps,canaltermigratorycuesforsalmonidstravelingouttotheocean.Fishcanalsobelostinthepumps.Toreducethenegativeeffectstofish,watertransfersarehighlyregulated.5.1.2.YubaRiverDebrisControlProject
TheRiversandHarborActofJune13,1902authorizedtheconstructionoftheYubaRiverDebrisControlProject,ofwhichDaguerrePointDamisapart,atanestimatedfirstcostof$800,000,one‐halfofwhichwasbornebytheU.S.CaliforniaDebrisCommission(CDC)andone‐halfbytheState. TheCDC,consistingofthreeArmyengineersappointedbythePresident,wasestablishedtoprovidefor:resumptionofhydraulicminingwithoutinjurytonavigationordamagetooverflow;torestore,asnearlyaspracticable,navigationconditionsasof1860;andtoaffordreliefinfloodtimeandtoprovidesufficientwatertomaintainscouringforceinsummertorestorechannelcapacities.TheCDCwaseffectiveindebrismanagement.UpondecommissioningoftheCDCbySection1106ofWRDA1986(P.L.99‐662),,administrationDaguerrePointDamwasassumedbyUSACE.
19
DaguerrePointDam
DaguerrePointDam(Figure2)islocatedontheYubaRiverapproximately11.5milesupstreamofMarysville.AlthoughthedamwascompletedinMayof1906,theriverwasnotdivertedoverthedamuntil1910(USACE2007).DaguerrePointDamrapidlyfilledtocapacitywithsedimentanddebristhatmoveddownstreamduringfloodingin1911(Hunerlachetal.2004).DaguerrePointDamwasrebuiltin1965afteritwasdamagedandbreachedbyfloodsin1963and1964.Theareabehindthedamisalmostentirelyfilledwithupto4millioncubicyardsofsediment(DWRandUSACE2003)thathasaccumulatedsinceitwasrebuilt.AportionofthissedimentnexttotheupstreamfaceofthedamisremovedannuallybyUSACEtofacilitatefishpassage.Presently,USACEisresponsiblefortheoperationandmaintenanceofDaguerrePointDam.DaguerrePointDamkeyfeaturesincludethefollowing(USACE2012): Overflowconcreteogee(“s‐shaped”)spillwaywithconcreteapronandabutments Ogeespillwaysectionis575feetwideand25feettall Originallydesignedtoretainhydraulicminingdebris Currentlyusedtofacilitatewaterdiversionforirrigationpurposes Notoperatedforfloodcontrol Nostoragecapacity–reservoirfilledwithhydraulicminingdebrisandsediments
TherearethreewaterdiversionsassociatedwithDaguerrePointDam,whichutilizetheelevatedhead1createdbythedam,ortheinfluenceofthedaminthepreventionofadditionalriverchannelincision,togravity‐feedtheircanals.ThethreediversionsaretheHallwood‐Corduadiversion,theSouthYuba/Brophydiversion,andtheBrownsValleyIrrigationDistrict(BVID)diversion,whichhaveacombinedcapacityof1,085cfs.Also,theincreasedwaterlevelcreatedbyDaguerrePointDamsignificantlyenhancesgroundwaterrechargeintheYubagroundwatersub‐basins,whichiscriticallyimportantsourceofwaterreliabilityforYubaCounty.Inadditiontothedamstructure,therearetwofishladders,eachwithacontrolgate.Thetwofishladdersutilizethehydraulicheadcreatedbythedamduetotheinfluenceofthedampreventingadditionalchannelincisionabovethedam.Thepurposeofthesetwofishladdersistopermitsalmonandsteelheadaccessuprivertotheseasonalspawningareas.Othernativespecies,pikeminnowandsuckers,havealsobeenobservedusingtheladders.However,theladdersdonotmeetmodernfishpassagedesignstandards,andtheyarenoteffectiveinpassingallspeciesofconcernoverafullrangeofflows(NMFS2014a).TherearenorecreationfacilitieslocatedatDaguerrePointDam. EnglebrightDam OriginallyknownasUpperNarrowsReservoir,HarryL.EnglebrightDamandLakeisonthe 1The“elevatedhead”atDaguerrePointDamiscreatedbythehydraulicconditionsassociatedwithwaterbeingimpoundedbehind(i.e.,upstream)ofthedam.TheCorpshasnocontroloverthein‐riverflows,andhasnodiscretionarycontroloverthe“head”forlocalwaterusersinthevicinityofDaguerrePointDam.
20
mainstreamoftheYubaRiver(RM23.9)approximately20milesnortheastofMarysville.TheconcretearchdamandreservoirwasauthorizedbytheRiversandHarborsActof1935aspartoftheSacramentoRiverandTributariesProject.CompletedbytheCDCin1941,theprojectwasauthorizedprimarilytocontainhydraulicminingsedimentsoriginatinginupstreamareas(USACE2013).EnglebrightDamis260feethigh(Figure3),andthestoragecapacityofthereservoirwas69,700AFatthetimeofconstruction(Childsetal.2003).However,duetosedimentbuildupsinceconstruction,thegrossstoragecapacitywasmorerecentlyestimatedatapproximately50,000AF(USGS2003).ThevolumeofsedimentinEnglebrightLakeissignificantandwasestimatedatapproximately28millioncubicyardsin2003bytheUSGS(MWH2013).AdditionaldetailsregardingEnglebrightDamandLakeareprovidedbelow.
Englebright Dam is a concrete constant angle arch structure. Dam crest length of 1,142 feet and the dam top crest width is 21 feet. Dam spillway crest elevation is 527 feet msl. Maximum spillway design capacity is 108,000 cfs. Reservoir water surface elevation generally fluctuates between 517 feet to 525 feet msl on a
daily and weekly basis. Englebright Reservoir is used as an afterbay for releases from New Bullards Bar Reservoir
through the New Colgate Powerhouse and is used as a regulating reservoir to meet recreation and power generation needs and to capture uncontrolled flows from the Middle and South Yuba rivers to manage downstream releases to the lower Yuba River.
Englebright Lake is approximately 9 miles long. Englebright Dam provides the hydraulic head for approximately 67 MW of electric
generation at the Narrows 1 and 2 powerhouses.
Waterinthereservoirprovidesforrecreationalopportunitiesandforhydroelectricpowergeneration.Thereservoirdoesnothaveanydedicatedfloodstoragespaceandonlyprovidesincidentalfloodcontrolbenefits.Sincethereservoirwasconstructedforminingdebrisretentionandnotforfloodcontrolpurposes,itdoesnothavealow‐leveloutlet.Infact,thedesignofthedamallowsunregulatedfloodflowstospilloverEnglebrightDamduringfloodevents.Sincearound1941,controlledreleasesintothelowerYubaRiverhavebeenmadefromthePacificGasandElectricNarrows1powerplantandsince1970fromtheYCWANarrows2powerplant,bothFederalEnergyRegulatoryCommission(FERC)‐licensedfacilities.Thesepowerplantsarejustdownstreamofthedam.EnglebrightDamrepresentsthedelineationbetweentheupperandlowerYubaRiver(USACE2012).EnglebrightLakeiscurrentlyusedforrecreationandhydroelectricpowergeneration.EnglebrightDamanditsassociatedhydropowerfacilitiesareimpassableintheupstreamdirectionandthereforerepresenttheupstreamlimitofanadromousfishmigrationintheYubaRiver(NMFS2014a). 5.1.3.NewBullardsBarDamThelargeststructureontheriver,NewBullardsBarDam,isontheNorthYubaRiver,approximately18milesupstreamfromEnglebright.Constructionwascompletedin1970byYCWAaspartofFERCProjectNo.2246toprovidewaterforpowergeneration,irrigationand
21
domesticneeds,floodcontrol,andrecreation(YCWA2010),andthedamis645feethigh.ReleasesfromNewBullardsBarReservoiraremadethroughtheNewColgatePowerhouse,throughthedam’slow‐leveloutlet,orgatedspillway(YCWAetal.2007;YCWA2014).Thereservoirisusedheavilyforrecreation,anditpowerstwohydroelectricplants.Figure4displaysNewBullardsBarDam.AdditionaldetailsaboutNewBullardsBarDamandReservoirareasfollows(YCWA2010):
1,110‐footradius,doublecurvature,concretearchdam. Damheightis645feet Overflow‐typespillwaywithawidthof106feet. Spillwaycrestelevationof1,902feetmsl. Three30‐footwideand54‐foottallTainterGatesonthespillway. Maximumspillwaydesigncapacityof160,000cfs. Provides hydraulic head for 340 MW of hydroelectric peaking power at the Colgate
powerhouse. Thereservoirextendsapproximately8.5milesupstreamatthenormalmaximumwater
surfaceelevation(1,956feet). Estimatedreservoirstoragecapacityis966,103acre‐feet. Reservoirmaximumdepthis645feet. Normalwaterlevelfluctuationsof150feet
5.1.4.OtherExistingWaterProjectsOtherdamshavebeenconstructedintheYubaRiverWatershedforirrigationanddrinkingwatersupplies.Manyoftheearlierdamsarenowusedforhydropowerinadditiontonewerdamsconstructedwithhydropowerasapurpose.OtherhydroelectricprojectswithintheYubaRiverwatershedaretheYuba‐BearProjectmanagedbytheNevadaIrrigationDistrict(awateragencybasedinGrassValley,California)andtheDrum‐SpauldingProjectoverseenbyPacificGasandElectricCompany.
5.2. PriorStudiesTheYubaRiverdownstreamofEnglebrightDamisoneofthemorethoroughlystudiedriversintheCentralValleyofCalifornia.MuchoftheresearchisconnectedtotheFederalEnergyRegulatoryCommission(FERC)relicensingprocessofYCWA’sYubaRiverDevelopmentProject(YRDP).InAppendixE6ofYCWA’sApplicationforNewLicense,TechnicalMemorandum7‐8summarizestheavailableliteratureforspring‐runChinooksalmonwherespecificallyidentified,Chinooksalmoningeneralwhererunsarenotspecificallyidentified,andO.mykiss(includingsteelhead).Thetechnicalmemorandumsummarilydescribes21availablefieldstudiesanddatacollectionreports,20otherrelevantdocuments(e.g.,plans,policies,historicalaccountsandregulatorycompliance),14ongoingdatacollection,monitoringandevaluationactivitiesfortheM&EProgram,and4otherdatacollectionandmonitoringprograms.Additionalkeypriorstudiesandreportsaredescribedbelow.
22
AssessmentofInfrastructureandRelatedItemstoSupportAnadromousFishPassagetotheYubaRiverWatershed,PreparedbyMWHfortheYubaSalmonForum.March2013.ThereportprovidedanassessmentofinfrastructuretosupportanadromousfishpassagetotheYubaRiverWatershed,includinganengineeringassessmentofthefacilities,appurtenances,costs,permitting,andchangestotheinfrastructureandoperationsofexistingfacilitiesrequiredfortheimplementationandoperationsandmaintenance(O&M)ofanAnadromousFishPassageProgramtolocationsintheupperYubaRiverWatershed,includingtheNorth,Middle,andSouthYubarivers.BiologicalAssessmentfortheApplicationforNewFERCLicenseDraft,YCWA,April2014 TheBAidentifiedandevaluatedpotentialeffectsonthreatenedandendangeredspeciesfromtheYCWA’spowergeneratingactivities.ItwasrequiredaspartoftheFERCrelicensingprocess. BiologicalAssessmentforOperationandMaintenanceforDaguerrePointDamontheYubaRiver,USACE,October2013 TheBAdefinedandevaluatedthepotentialeffectsofUSACE’slimitedongoingdiscretionaryactivitiesatDaguerrePointDamonthreatenedandendangeredspeciesandtheirdesignatedcriticalhabitatsinthelowerYubaRiver.ItsupersededtheJanuary2012BAfortheOngoingOperationandMaintenanceofEnglebrightandDaguerrePointDams.BiologicalAssessmentforOperationandMaintenanceforEnglebrightReservoirontheYubaRiver,USACE,October2013
TheBAdefinedandevaluatedthepotentialeffectsofUSACE’songoingdiscretionaryactivitiesatEnglebrightDamandReservoironESA‐listedspeciesandtheirdesignatedcriticalhabitatsinthelowerYubaRiver.ItsupersededtheJanuary2012BAfortheOngoingOperationandMaintenanceofEnglebrightandDaguerrePointDams.
BiologicalOpinionforOperationandMaintenanceofDaguerrePointDamandFishLadders,NMFS,May2014 TheBiOprespondedtothe2013DaguerrePointDamBAandconcludedthatimplementationoftheproposedactionisnotlikelytojeopardizethethreatenedandendangeredspeciesoradverselymodifytheirdesignatedcriticalhabitat.NMFSincludedReasonableandPrudentMeasuresanddiscretionarytermsandconditionsthatareintendedtominimizeincidentaltakeassociatedwiththeproposedaction.TheBiOpsupersededtheFebruary2012BiOpforOperationandMaintenanceofEnglebrightandDaguerrePointDams. DaguerrePointDamFishPassageImprovementProjectAlternativeConcepts
23
Evaluation,WoodRodgers,Inc.,Sacramento,CA,September2003 Thisevaluationdescribedthepotentialsolutions(andlimitationsofeach)forfishpassageimprovementsatDaguerrePointDamasrecommendedbytheCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame(DFG,nowtheDepartmentofFishandWildlife).Itprovidedcostsforeachsolutionandcomparedtheimpactstofishpassage,watersupplyinterests,anddownstreamfloodprotectionrelativetothecostforimplementation. InterimMonitoring&EvaluationReportDraft,LowerYubaRiverAccord,RiverManagementTeam,April2013 TheInterimMonitoringandEvaluation(M&E)Reportservedasbotha‘reportcard’ontheLowerYubaRiverAccord’sRMT’sM&EprogramresultsregardingtheimplementationoftheYubaAccordforregulators,stakeholdersandthebroaderscientificcommunity,andtohelpinformtheFERCrelicensingprocess. LetterofConcurrenceforOperationandMaintenanceforEnglebrightReservoirontheYubaRiver,NMFS,May2014 Theletterwasrespondedtothe2013USACEBiOpforOperationandMaintenanceforEnglebrightReservoir.Intheletter,NMFSconcurswithUSACE’sdeterminationthattheprojectproposedintheBiOpisnotlikelytoadverselyaffectCentralValleyspring‐runChinooksalmonandsteelheadorgreensturgeonorthespecies’designatedcriticalhabitats. PreliminaryFishPassageImprovementStudy,USACE,August2001 ThispreliminarystudyidentifiedpotentialalternativesforfishpassageimprovementatDaguerrePointDamontheYubaRiver.Itincludedpreliminaryplanstoreducefisheriesresourceproblemsinthestudyarea.Itprovidedtheprojectstatusandplannedfutureeffortsneededtoconductafeasibilitystudywhichwouldimprovefishpassage. UpperYubaRiverWatershedChinookSalmonandSteelheadHabitatAssessment,DWR,2007 TheCaliforniaDepartmentofWaterResources’(DWR)UpperYubaRiverStudiesProgramconductedthisstudytodeterminewhetherthere‐ introductionofwildChinooksalmonandsteelheadtotheupperYubaRiverwatershedisbiologicallyfeasible.ThestudyconcludedthattheMiddleYubaRivercouldsupportasmallsalmonrun. YubaRiver,California,DaguerrePointDamInitialAppraisalReport,USACE,August2005 ThisSection216studydeterminedthatthereisFederalinterestinproceedingwithdetailedfeasibility‐levelstudiestoincludefishpassageimprovement,fisheriesrestoration,aquatichabitatrestoration,andflooddamagereductionassociatedwithDaguerrePointDam. YubaRiverBasinPostAuthorizationDocumentationReport,USACE,December2012
24
TheYubaRiverBasin,California,PostAuthorizationDocumentationReport(PADR)reaffirmedthatthereisFederalinterestinprojectimprovementswithintheLinda/OlivehurstareaoftheauthorizedYubaRiverBasinProject.Theproject,asauthorized,includesimprovementstostrengthenexistingleveestoprovidefloodriskmanagement(FRM)benefitstotheCityofMarysvilleandtotheReclamationDistrict784area.YubaSalmonForumSummaryHabitatAnalysis,PreparedbyCardnoENTRIXfortheYubaSalmonForum,September2013Thisreportprovidesasummaryassessmentofpotentialanadromousspring‐runChinooksalmonandsteelheadhabitatintheYubaRiverWatershed.ThesummaryassessmentwasdesignedtoprovidetheYSFwithhabitatinformationthatcanbeusedtoreviewpotentialactionsthatwarrantfurtherinvestigationregardingintroductionofCentralValleyspring‐runChinooksalmonandCentralValleysteelheadintotheNorth,Middle,and/orSouthYubariversand/orportionsoftheYubaRiver.Thesummaryassessmentincludesasynthesisofdatafromvarioussourcesthatincludeshydrology,watertemperature,upstreammigrationbarriers,andaquantificationofmigration,holding,spawning,incubation,rearing,andsmoltemigrationhabitat. 5.3 RestorationProjects OtherentitiesarealsoworkingtorestorelowerYubaRiverriparianandaquatichabitat.TheSouthYubaRiverCitizen’sLeague(SYRCL)completedtheHammonBarRiparianHabitatRestorationProjectwhichrestoredfiveacresofriparianhabitatand3.5milesofjuvenilerearingaquatichabitat. 6. Scoping DuetoitsrelationshiptoESA‐listedspecies,thisstudyisimportanttomanystakeholdersaswellasFederal,state,county,andlocalgovernmentalagencies,andconservationgroupswhichareactivelyworkingtobringsalmonbacktotheupperpartsoftheriver.TheYubaSalmonForum,ofwhichUSACEisapart,convenedin2009toaddressreintroductionplanninginacollaborativeforumwithbroadrepresentationandacharter.Thisanalysisincorporatessomeoftheconsensusreachedbythatgroup. TheYubaAccordisa2008settlementagreementrepresentingnearlythreeyearsofintensenegotiationsamong17stakeholders,includinglocalirrigationdistricts,stateandFederalresourceagenciesandconservationgroups.Thesettlementprovidesforhigherflowrequirementsthatareprotectiveofthesalmonidfishery.Also,thesettlementcreatedtheRiverManagementTeam,whichperformsfisheryandrestorationstudiesonthelowerYubaRiverandprovidesinputtoYCWAonflowmanagementdecisions.OnAugust6,2014,CorpsstaffmetwithrepresentativesfromNMFSandFWStobriefthemonthereconnaissancestudyandtheprocessleadingtoafeasibilitystudy.Thestaffheardaboutothersimilarprojectsandstudies,suchasNFMS’“RIPPLEreports.”FWSaskedUSACEtoinvestigateamphibianhabitat,particularlyforthefoothillyellow‐leggedfrog(Ranaboylii),
25
alongtributariestotheYubaRiver.Thisfeedbackwillberesearchedandpossiblyincorporatedintothefeasibilitystudy,andUSACEwillcontinuetodialoguewiththeNMFSandFWSrepresentatives. Overthecourseofpreparationofthisanalysis,USACEmetwithrepresentativesfrompotentialnon‐federalsponsorsforthisstudy(DWRandYCWA).Cooperatingagenciesandstakeholdersinadditiontothesponsorsforthisstudyinclude,butarenotlimitedto:NMFS,FWS,CaliforniaDepartmentofFish&Wildlife(CDFW),theTahoeNationalForest,publicrecreationgroups,irrigationdistricts,theSouthYubaRiverCitizensLeague(SYRCL),andTroutUnlimited.USACEwillconsultwiththeNativeAmericantribesofthearea. 7. Problems,Opportunities,andFutureWithout‐ProjectConditions Problemsareundesirableconditionstobechangedthroughtheimplementationofanalternativeplan.Opportunitiesarepositiveconditionstobeimprovedbyanalternativeplan.Thedifferencebetweenproblemsandopportunitiesisoftensimplyamatterofperspective. BecausehabitatsoftheYubaRiverarehealthyandrecoveringfromhistoricaldisturbances(YCWA2013),thelargestremainingproblemisthelossofhabitatconnectivityforanadromousfishspecies,whicharenationallysignificantresources.Fishcannotaccessupstreamhabitatbecauseofthepresenceofdamsoreffectivefishpassagemechanisms.Conceptualmodelsarehelpfulduringthefirststepsoftheplanningprocess,astheyprovideakeylinkbetweenearlyplanning(e.g.,aneffectivestatementofproblem,need,opportunity,andconstraint)andlaterevaluationandimplementation.Forthis905(b)analysis,thefollowingconceptualmodel(Figure10)wasdeveloped,whichexploresthesalmonidlifecycleanditsconnectiontotheYubaRiver.
26
Figure10.SalmonidLifeCycleConceptualModel.
7.1. ProblemsTheconceptualmodelassistsinunderstandingtheanadromoussalmonids’lifecyclesandfunctionalrelationshipsintheYubaRiver,assummarizedbelow.
1. Aquatichabitatconnectivityhasbeenlost.Inparticular,anadromousfishcannotaccesshistoricspawninghabitataboveEnglebrightDam.
DaguerrePointDammay,undercertainconditions,beanimpedimenttoanadromousfishpassage—salmonidscan’tusethefishladdersundersomeflowconditions,andsturgeoncan’tusetheladdersatall.Additionally,fishmaybecomeinjuredastheypassdownstreamoverDaguerrePointDam.EnglebrightDamblocksallanadromousfishpassage.
2. Thequalityandquantityofaquatic,riparian,andgeneralfloodplainhabitathas
beendiminished.Inparticular,anadromousfishspawninggravelhasbeenreducedthroughouttheYubaRiver,andjuvenilerearinghabitathasbeenreducedinthelowerYubaRiver.
27
Inadditiontowhathasbeenlostupstreamofthedams,habitatloss,especiallyforjuvenileanadromousfish,hascontributedtoreducedpopulationsofnativefishintheYubaRiver.AlthoughUSACE’sgravelaugmentationprogramhasincreasedtheamountofspawninghabitatdownstreamofEnglebrightDam,highquality,complexanddiversejuvenilerearinghabitatislacking,asisfloodplainhabitat.
3. Salmonidgeneticdiversityhasdeclinedthroughoutthestudyareaandworld‐wide.
Thelimitedavailabilityofspawninghabitatandimpededpassagecanresultinoverlapofdifferentspawningrunsinthesamespawningareaduringthesameperiod,whichreducesgeneticintegrity.Also,hatcheryfishstrayintothelowerYubaRiverfromtheFeatherRiverandothersystemsandinterbreedwiththenativefishaswellascompetewithnative‐spawnedYubaRiverfishforspawninghabitatandotherresources.
AnadromoussalmonidpopulationsintheYubaRiverwatershedhaveendurednearly150yearsofintensehumandegradationoftheirriverinehabitat,startingwithhydraulicgoldmininginthemid‐nineteenthcentury,andcontinuingthroughtheconstructionofdams,includingthetwoCorpsdams‐EnglebrightandDaguerrePoint.Numerousstressors,severalofwhichareassociatedwithpasthydraulicminingpracticesandthesetwodams,continuetoaffectthefisheryresourcesintheYubaRiver.ManyofthemostimportantstressorsaffectinganadromoussalmonidsintheYubaRiverincludepassageimpedimentsandbarriers,physicalhabitatalteration,lossofriparianhabitatandinstreamcover(e.g.,riparianvegetation,instreamwoodymaterial),lossofnaturalrivermorphologyandfunction,lossoffloodplainhabitat,entrainment,predation,andhatcheryeffects.Thekeylimitingfactors,threatsandstressorsaffectingspring‐andfall‐runChinooksalmon,aswellassteelhead,arethoroughlydiscussedinUSACE’s2013BAsandarebrieflysummarizedbelow.Thegeomorphicconditionscausedbyhydraulicanddredgeminingsincethemid‐1800s,andtheconstructionofEnglebrightDam,whichaffectsthetransportofnutrients,fineandcoarsesedimentsand,toalesserdegree,woodymaterialfromupstreamsourcestothelowerriver,continuetolimithabitatcomplexityanddiversity,particularlyforjuvenilesalmonidsrearinginthelowerYubaRiver.Restrictedavailabilityofcomplex,diversehabitatssuchasmultiplebraidedchannelsandsidechannelsassociatedwiththelossofnaturalrivermorphologyandfunctionalsopresentlycontinuestobearelativelyhighstressortoYubaRiveranadromoussalmonids.Riparianvegetationandlargewoodymaterial(LWM)playanimportantroleinhabitatcomplexityanddiversity.TheabundanceanddistributionofthesephysicalhabitatcharacteristicspotentiallylimitstheproductivityofjuvenilesalmonidsinthelowerYubaRiver.Also,thelowerYubaRiverfloodplainiscomprisedofunconsolidatedalluviumwithoutanabundanceofcharacteristicsassociatedwithincreasedjuvenilesalmonidgrowth.EnglebrightDamisanimpassablebarriertotheupstreammigrationofanadromoussalmonids,andmarkstheupstreamextentofcurrentlyaccessibleChinooksalmonandsteelheadhabitatinthelowerYubaRiver.AccordingtoNMFS(2007,2009,2014),thegreatestimpacttolistedanadromoussalmonidsintheYubaRiverWatershedisthecompleteblockageofaccessforthesespeciestotheirhistoricalspawningandrearinghabitataboveEnglebrightDam.BecauseofthelossofhistoricalspawningandrearinghabitataboveEnglebrightDam,
28
resultantlossofreproductiveisolationandsubsequenthybridizationwithfall‐runChinooksalmon,restrictionofspatialstructureandassociatedvulnerabilitytocatastrophicevents,theexistenceofEnglebrightDamisaveryhighstressortoYubaRiverspring‐runChinooksalmon,aswellastosteelhead.InadditiontoEnglebrightDam,therearenumerousissuesassociatedwithanadromousfishpassageatUSACE’sDaguerrePointDam.NMFS(2014)statedthatpassageconditionsatDaguerrePointDamareconsideredtobeinadequateforChinooksalmonandsteelheadthroughoutmuchoftheyearduetothedesignoftheexistingladders.Whenhighflowconditionsoccurduringwinterandspring,adultspring‐runChinooksalmonandsteelheadreportedlycanexperiencedifficultyinfindingtheentrancestotheladdersbecauseoftherelativelylowamountofattractionflowsexitingthefishladders,comparedtothemagnitudeofthesheet‐flowspillingoverthetopofDaguerrePointDam(USACE2013).Inaddition,NMFS(2014)statedthattheanglesofthefishladderentranceorificesandtheirproximitiestotheplungepoolalsoincreasethedifficultyforfishtofindtheentrancestotheladders.Otherconfigurationanddesignfeaturesofthefishladdersandpassagefacilitiesthatreportedlycouldeitherdelayorimpedeanadromoussalmonidaccesstospawningandrearingareasabovethedaminclude:(1)thecontrolgate,actingasasubmergedorifice,isonlypassableatlowflows(actualflowdataareunavailable)duringthesummerandfall;(2)“masking”oftheentrancestotheladderswhenflowoverthespillwayoccurs;(3)theladdersbecomecloggedwithdebris;(4)unfavorablewithin‐bayhydrauliccharacteristics,particularlyassociatedwithdebriscollection;(5)unfavorablefishladdergeometricconfigurations;and(6)sedimentationandunfavorablehabitatconditionsassociatedwithegressfromthefishladders.NMFS(2014)andotherdocuments(NMFS2002;CALFEDandYCWA2005)suggestthatjuvenilesalmonidsalsomaybeadverselyaffectedbyDaguerrePointDamontheirdownstreammigrations,becauseDaguerrePointDamcreatesalargeplungepoolatitsbase,whichprovidesambushhabitatforpredatoryfishinanareawhereemigratingjuvenilesalmonidsmaybeinjuredordisorientedafterplungingoverthefaceofthedamintothedeeppoolbelow.TheintroducedpredatorystripedbassandAmericanshadhavebeenobservedinthispool(CALFEDandYCWA2005).
7.2. OpportunitiesAccordingtoUSDOI(2010),someofthefactorsresponsibleforreductionsinChinooksalmonpopulationscanbeminimizedthroughrestorationactions.Opportunitiesexisttosignificantlyimproveaquatichabitatconnectivity,habitatqualityandquantity,andgeneticdiversity,andtolessenstressorsaffectinganadromoussalmonidsintheYubaRiverWatershedovertheperiodofanalysis.
1. ThereisanopportunitytoreintroduceanadromoussalmonidsintotheupperYubaRiverWatershed.
Reintroductionoftargetpopulations(e.g.,spring‐runChinooksalmonandsteelhead)intothehighestquality,mostavailableandpersistenthabitatintheupperYubaRiverWatershedwouldbeexpectedtoexpandthegeographicdistributionofanadromoussalmonids,increasetheoverallamountofhabitatavailablebyreconnectingaccessto
29
previouslyblockedhabitat,decreasethepossibilityofcatastrophicdecline,andincreasetheattributesofspatialstructureanddiversity.Allofthesefactorsdecreasetheextinctionriskandtherebycontributetorecovery.
2. Thereisanopportunitytorestoreside‐channelhabitatinthelowerYubaRiver.InthelowerYubaRiver,opportunitiesexisttoimplementside‐channelhabitatrestorationactions,shallowwaterrearingimprovementactions,riparianhabitatimprovementsandoff‐channelrearingactions.HabitatimprovementactionsinthelowerYubaRiveralsowouldbeexpectedtoincreasetheproductivityofYubaRiveroriginjuveniles.LowerYubaRiverhabitatimprovementactionscouldincreasethecarryingcapacityofspawninghabitatand,correspondingly,initialyearclassstrengthofspring‐runChinooksalmon.Perhapsmoreimportantly,itisanticipatedthatthelowerYubaRiverhabitatimprovementactionswouldfocusonjuvenilerearingandcontributetotheoverallgoalofincreasingproductivityandsurvivalofjuvenileanadromoussalmonidswhichsubsequentlyreturnasadultstothelowerYubaRiver.
3. Thereisanopportunitytoconsiderrecreationinconjunctionwithanyrecommendedecosystemrestorationfeatures.
4. Theremaybeanopportunitytore‐establishaCaliforniared‐leggedfrogpopulation,notonlyalongtheYubaRiver,butalsointributaries.
Opportunitieswillbeexploredfurtherduringthefeasibilitystudy.
7.3. FutureWithout‐ProjectConditions IfnoFederalactionistaken,thefisheries‐relatedproblemsdescribedaboveareexpectedtocontinue,andthestressorswillpersistandpotentiallybecomeexacerbated.Incrementalimprovementstocurrentlyaccessiblehabitatmaybemadebyotherentities.PopulationsofChinooksalmonandsteelhead,whilestabilizing,willbelessthanwhatanincreaseinconnectedhabitatcouldsupport.Also,populationswillnotbeasresilienttochangingconditionsduetothelackofaccesstoupstreamhabitataswellasgenetichomogenization.MiningwillcontinueintheGoldfields,andthetailingswillremain.RestorationopportunitiesmaybepresentintheGoldfields,however,duetothetremendousvolumeofgraveltailingsandinabilityofthosetailingstosupportmuchvegetation,thisanalysisdoesnotincludeanyrecommendationsfortheGoldfields.Restorationactionsbyotherentitieswillcontinue.TheUSBureauofReclamation’sCentralValleyBasinFisheriesProgramshastwoprojectsintheplanningphase,theNarrowsChannelRestorationandtheDaguerreAlleyFloodplainRestorationProjects.TheYubaRiverNarrowsChannelRestorationProjectwillrestoreupto0.5milesofin‐channelspawninghabitatbyrestoringandreplenishinggravelandremovingshotrockdebrisfromtheNarrowsReach,whichisbelowEnglebrightDam.TheDaguerreAlleyFloodplainRestorationProjectwillrestoreupto180acresoffloodplainhabitatandapproximately
30
2.5milesofside‐channelhabitat,whichisparticularlybeneficialtojuvenilesalmonids.Thenumberofsalmonidsreturningfromtheoceanwillcontinuetofluctuateduetovariousstressors,suchasfishingandoceanconditions.BecauseofmanagementactionsbythePacificFisheryManagementCouncil,suchasseasonalcommercialandrecreationalfishingbanswhensalmonidnumbersarelow,itisexpectedthatreturningsalmonidpopulationswillbesufficienttoutilizeavailablespawningandrearinghabitatintheYubaRiver.Overthenext50years,climatechangeisexpectedtobeastressorforanadromoussalmonidsintheYubaRiver,andclimatechangeingeneralposesanadditionalrisktothesurvivalofsalmonidsintheCentralValley(NMFS2014).AccordingtoNationalOceanicandAtmosphericAdministration(NOAA)research,undertheexpectedwarmingofaround5°C,substantialhabitatintheCentralValleywouldbelost,althoughsignificantamountsofhabitatcouldremain,primarilyintheFeatherandYubarivers(Lindleyetal.2007).Literaturesuggeststhatbytheyear2100,meansummertemperaturesintheCentralValleymayincreaseby2to8°C,precipitationwilllikelyshifttomorerainandlesssnow,withsignificantdeclinesintotalprecipitationpossible,hydrographswilllikelychange,andChinooksalmonandsteelheadwillbemorethermallystressedbystreamwarmingatthesouthernendsoftheirranges(e.g.,CentralValleyDomain)(NMFS2014).NMFS(2014)hasprioritizedtheupperYubaRiver(upstreamofEnglebrightDam)asaprimaryareatore‐establishviablepopulationsofspring‐runChinooksalmonandsteelhead.RecentstudiesconductedbyYSF(2013)demonstratethatofallrivers/reachesintheYubaRiverWatershed,theNorthYubaRiverupstreamofNewBullardsBarReservoirandthelowerYubaRiverdownstreamofEnglebrightDamprovidethemostthermallysuitableamountsofhabitatinthewatershed.TheNorthYubaRiver,becauseofthelackofstoragereservoirsandwatermanagementinfrastructure,mostcloselyapproximatesunimpairedconditions.AccordingtoYCWA(2010),becauseofspecificphysicalfactors,hydrologicfactors,andflowsnegotiatedundertheYubaAccordthelowerYubaRiverisexpectedtocontinuetoprovidethemostsuitablewatertemperatureconditionsforanadromoussalmonidsofallCentralValleyfloorrivers,eveniftherearelong‐termclimatechanges.ThisisbecauseNewBullardsBarReservoirisadeep,steep‐slopedreservoirwithamplecoldwaterpoolreservesthatwillcontinuetobeavailabletoprovidesustained,relativelycoldflowsofwaterintothelowerYubaRiverduringthelatespring,summerandfallofeachyear(YCWA2010).UrbandevelopmentalongtheYubaRiverwillbenegligible.Mostoftheupperwatershedisnationalforestland.ThetownsalongtheupperportionsoftheYubaRiverareoveranhour’sdrivefromjobcenters,sotheyarenotexpectedtogrowsignificantly.AreasalongthelowerYubaRiverareexpectedtoremainrural;indeed,YubaCounty’scurrentgeneralplan,from1996,statesthat,“theYubaCountywatershedwillbeconservedandprotectedthroughcarefulmanagementofgrowth,developmentandtimberharvestingwithinthewatershed.”Apreliminarypermitforaproposed3mega‐watthydroelectricprojectonthesouthsideofDaguerrePointDamiscurrentlyundergoingapreliminaryFERCproceeding(P‐14432)(NMFS2014a).However,noactionsareplannedatthistime.Itisassumedforthisanalysisthatthe
31
projectwouldberequiredtomitigateitsownimpacts,ifpermitted.
AuthorizedFunctions‐DaguerrePointDam UndertheDaguerrePointDamprojectauthority,USACEisresponsibleforvariousdiscretionaryandnon‐discretionaryfunctions.Thediscretionaryfunctionsinclude,butarenotlimitedto,thetimingandfrequencyofmonitoringandclearingdebrisfromthefishladders,andmanagingsedimentbuildupacrosstheupstreamfaceofthedam.FuturegravelinjectionsandtheLargeWoodyMaterialManagementPlanareanticipatedascomponentsofUSACE’svoluntaryconservationmeasuresassociatedwiththerecentESAconsultation.USACE’sGravelAugmentationImplementationPlancontainsguidanceforalong‐termgravelinjectionprogramtoprovidespring‐runChinooksalmonspawninghabitatinthebedrockcanyondownstreamofEnglebrightDam.Non‐discretionaryfunctionsincludetheinspectionandmaintenanceofthedamstructureandfishladderstoensuretheyremainingoodrepair.
AuthorizedFunctions‐EnglebrightDam UndertheEnglebrightDamprojectauthority,USACEisresponsibleforvariousdiscretionaryandnon‐discretionaryfunctions.Thediscretionaryfunctionsincludeactivitiesrelatedtothemannerandfrequencyofmaintainingtherecreationalfacilitiesatthedam.Non‐discretionaryfunctionsincludetheinspectionandmaintenanceofthedamstructuretoensureitremainsingoodrepair.Asadebrisdam,USACEdoesnotconductanywatercontroloperationsorreleases.
8. PlanningGoalsandObjectives EcosystemrestorationisoneoftheprimarymissionsofUSACE’sCivilWorksprogram.Theecosystemrestorationplanningobjectiveistocontributetonationalecosystemrestoration(NER).ContributionstoNERoutputsareincreasesinthenetquantityand/orqualityofdesiredecosystemresourcesovertheperiodofanalysis(often50years).MeasurementofNER,whichisbasedonchangesinecologicalresourcequalityasafunctionofimprovementinhabitatqualityand/orquantity,isexpressedquantitativelyinphysicalunits,alsoknownasmetrics.TheNERPlanisthealternativeplanthatreasonablymaximizesecosystemrestorationbenefitscomparedtocosts,consistentwiththeFederalobjective. Specificplanningobjectiveswillbedevelopedwiththenon‐Federalsponsorandstudystakeholdersduringthefeasibilitystudy.Theobjectiveswillidentifyhowtheplancanreducetheriskofcontinuedundesiredoutcomes,suchassteelheadpopulationdeclines,and/orincreasethelikelihoodofdesiredoutcomes,suchasmilesofaccessibleriparianhabitat.Metricswillbedevelopedinordertoassesstheoutputsandeffectsofthealternatives.Thesemetricswilllikelybebasedontheanadromousfishspeciesasindicatorspecies. Salmonareaneffectiveindicatorspeciesbecausetheyarefairlyeasytoobserveandtheyoccupytheentireriverecosystem.Theyaresensitivetoavarietyoffactors:waterquality,foodwebs,riverflowsandprocesses,turbidity,andwatertemperature.Generally,ifthequalityofthewatershedecosystemdeclines,salmonpopulationswill
32
decline.Also,salmonserveakeyroleinbringingnutrientsfromtheocean,suchasnitrogen,intoinlandareas.Thesenutrientsnourishcountlessotherorganisms. Onewaytoidentifyobjectivesistouseanexampleofafunctioninghabitat.Forriverecosystemrestorationprojects,suchanexampleisoftencalleda“referencereach.”OnehasnotyetbeenidentifiedalongtheYubaRiver,partlybecausetheUpperYubacan’teasilybecomparedtotheLowerYuba.Duringthefeasibilitystudy,possiblereferencereachesinotherwaterwayswillbeinvestigated,suchasalongtheCosumnesRiver,theonlyundammedriverdrainingwestoutoftheSierra,andtheTrinityRiverorBattleCreek,whichareundergoingrestorationefforts. Forthereconnaissancestudy,thefollowingpreliminaryobjectiveswereidentified.Theseobjectivesaddressthreebroadercategoriesofproblemsandopportunities:1)connectivity,2)habitatqualityandquantity,and3)geneticintegrity.Alternativesthatmeettheseobjectiveswillincreaseanadromousfishspecies’resiliencytowithstandclimatechangeaswellascatastrophiceventssuchaswildfires. Appropriate,limitedrecreation,inconjunctionwithecosystemrestorationfeatures,willbeconsidered,consistentwithUSACEpolicy. Alloftheobjectivesarethroughoutthestudyareaovertheperiodofanalysis,whichisexpectedtobe50years.
Connectivity:� ImproveorprovideaccesstohabitatforanadromoussalmonidswithintheYubaRiver
watershed.� ImproveupstreamanddownstreampassageforgreensturgeoninthelowerYuba
Rivertoprovideaccesstosuitablehabitat.
HabitatRestoration� Restorerearinghabitatofjuvenileanadromoussalmonids.� Restorespawninghabitatofspring‐runChinookdownstreamofEnglebrightDam.
GeneticIntegrity
� Preservegeneticdiversityofanadromoussalmonids,particularlyspring‐runChinooksalmon.Recreation
� Providerecreationopportunitiesinconjunctionwithecosystemrestorationfeatureswhererecreationusewouldnotdetractfromecosystemoutputs.
Meetingtheaboveobjectiveswillincreasetheresiliencyofsalmonidsandgreensturgeon.Increasingtheavailabilityandqualityofspawningandrearinghabitatwillincreasethelikelihoodthatnationally‐significantsalmonidscouldcontinuetoreproduce.Preservinggeneticdiversityprotectstheabilityofaspeciestowithstanddiseasesorchangingconditions.
33
9. PlanningConstraintsandKeyConsiderations Duringthefeasibilitystudy,specificstudyobjectivesandconstraintswillbeaddressedwiththenon‐federalsponsorandstudystakeholders.Atthistime,noabsoluteconstraintshavebeenidentified.However,akeylimitationontheformulationprocessisthatthestudywillnotrecommendanyactionthatislegallyrequiredofanotherentityorUSACEO&M.Forinstance,accordingtothePlanningGuidanceNotebookAppendixE,USACEwillnotproposeanyrestorationprojectsorfeaturesthatwouldresultintreatingorotherwiseabatingpollutionproblemscausedbyotherpartieswheretheotherpartieshave,orarelikelytohave,alegalresponsibilityforremediationorothercomplianceresponsibility.Anysuchactionswillbecomepartofthewithout‐projectcondition. Thefollowingconsiderationswererecognized.Theyarenotconstraints,astheywillnotprecludeconsiderationorselectionofanypotentialmeasuresoralternatives.However,thefeasibilitystudywillseektoidentifymeasuresandalternativesthataddresstheseconsiderationstotheextentpracticable.
� Avoidorminimizewherepracticableprovidingupstreampassagefornon‐nativefish.� Avoidorminimizewherepracticablefeaturesthatwouldrequireadditionalwater
rights.� Avoidorminimizeadverseeffectsonthedownstreamwaterusers’diversionsat
DaguerrePointDam.� Avoidorminimizewherepracticableincreasingfloodrisk.� Avoidorminimizewherepracticableimpedingnavigation.� Avoidorminimizewherepracticableimpactstogroundwaterrecharge.� Avoidorminimizewherepracticableimpedinggreensturgeonrecoveryefforts.� AvoidorminimizewherepracticableimpedingCRLFrecoveryefforts.� Avoidorminimizewherepracticableimpedingpublicaccessascurrentlyallowed.
AnoutstandingchallengeisandwillremainthepresenceofsignificantquantitiesoftoxicsedimentsbehindEnglebrightandDaguerrePointDams(includingmercury,arsenic,chromium,copper,andnickel) depositedfrompastmining.Responsibilitiesforanyhazardouscleanupwouldbedeterminedinaccordancewithapplicablelaws,regulations,andpolicies.10. FishandWildlifeResourcesConsiderations
10.1. ResourceSignificance
EcosystemrestorationisaprioritymissionofUSACE.Incontrasttomoretraditionalstudyoutputs,manyoftheoutputsofecosystemrestorationprojectscannotbemeasuredinmonetaryterms.Withouttheoptionofquantifyingecosystemoutputsinmonetaryterms,othercriteriamustbeconsideredforevaluatingandjustifyingecosystemrestorationprojects.Onesuchcriterionisthe“significance”oftheecosystemresource(s)associatedwithsuchprojects.Forthispurpose,resourcesignificancecanbedescribedintermsofinstitutional,public,andtechnicalconsiderationsasreflectedinSection3.
34
10.2. EnvironmentalCompliance
Thestudymustbecompliantwithallapplicablelawsandregulatoryrequirements.Duringthefeasibilitystudy,anenvironmentaldocumentwillbepreparedtoevaluatepotentialimpactsofanecosystemrestorationstudyontheexistingenvironment.Factorsaddressedbytheevaluationinclude,butarenotlimitedto,publicsafety,waterquality,wetlands,threatenedandendangeredspecies,noise,economics,fish,andwildlife.TheNationalEnvironmentalPolicyAct(NEPA)reviewprocesswillbecompleted,pursuanttorequirementsin33CFRPart230.ThisprocessincludesdemonstratingcompliancewithallapplicablelawsandregulationstoincludetheESA,CleanWaterAct,NationalHistoricPreservationAct,FishandWildlifeCoordinationAct,NoiseControlAct,Magnuson‐StevensAct,ExecutiveOrder11988onFloodplainManagement,andExecutiveOrder11990ontheProtectionofWetlands.
10.3. SurveysNeededforFeasibilityStudy TherehavebeenmanystudiesandsurveysintheYubaRiverWatershed.Recently,effortshaveincreasedtounderstandportionsofthissystem,primarilythelowerYubaRiver,resultingfromtheLowerYubaRiverAccordandFERCrelicensingeffortsforthehydropowerfacilitiesassociatedwithEnglebrightDamandNewBullardsBarDam.InadditiontothelowerYubaRiverstudies,therehavebeenhabitatsurveysandmodelingofhabitatintheUpperYubaRiverWatershedtoidentifyquantityandqualityofhabitatforsalmonintheeventthatpassageisrestoredtoallowfishtoaccessthesereaches.Manyofthesestudiesandmodelshavebeenfocusedonwatertemperature,whichislikelyalimitingfactorformuchofthewatershed.However,theremaybestructuralopportunitiesthatneedtobeevaluatedwhichwouldrequireadditionalevaluationofcurrenthabitatconditions. Whiletherehasbeenasignificantefforttounderstandthissystemanditsprocesses,therewilllikelybeadditionalsurveysandstudiesforsupportingthefeasibilitystudy.Muchofthiseffortwilllikelybuildonthepreviousandongoingefforts,butmayneedtobesite‐specificorbuilduponorcontinueeffortsthatwereperformedpreviously,butarenotcurrentlyongoing.TheremaybenewstudieslookingatthepredatorpopulationsandmovementsinthelowerYubaRiverandperhapsadditionalhabitatevaluationsintheupperYubaRiver.Also,hydraulicevaluationsofareasinthewatershedmaybenecessarytoidentifyfeasiblelocationsforcollectingfishifrelocationisconsideredinthealternatives.Surveysoftributaryhabitatsshouldbeconsideredtohelptodeterminetheextentofopportunitytorestorehabitatforfish,amphibiansandotherriparianhabitat‐associatedanimals.Sincemuchoftheexistinghabitatworkhasbeenfocusedonsalmonandsteelhead,itmayrequireadditionalefforttoidentifyandevaluateopportunitiesforotherESA‐listedspeciessuchastheCRLF. Somespecificstudiesmightincludeuseofacoustictelemetryandsnorkelsurveystomonitorfishmovementandhabitatuse.Continuedsurveysofredds,gravelmovement,andchannelcomplexitymightalsobenecessarytohelpdevelopalternativesandbetteridentifyfuture‐without‐projectconditions.
35
11. HistoricalandCulturalResourcesConsiderations HistoricalResources
YCWAconductedarchaeologicalandhistoricalarchitecturestudiesaspartoftheFERCrelicensingprocess.TheFERCProjectAreaofPotentialEffects(APE)lieswithinthereconnaissancestudyarea.TheAPEencompassesapproximately9,600acres,andYCWAreceivedtheCaliforniaStateHistoricPreservationOffice’s(SHPO’s)concurrenceontheAPEinaletterdatedFebruary5,2013. In2009,YCWAperformedrecordssearchesattheNortheastInformationCenteratCaliforniaStateUniversity,ChicoandtheNorthCentralInformationcenteratCaliforniaStateUniversity,Sacramento.Itwasdeterminedthatapproximately2000acresoftheAPEhadbeenpreviouslysurveyed.Onehundredandfifty‐six(156)previouslyrecordedarchaeologicalsitesarewithintheFERCProjectBoundaryand0.25‐milebuffer.Ofthese,26siteswereinsidetheAPEandtheremaining130sitesarewithinthe0.25‐milebufferoutsidetheAPE.NopreviouslyrecordedsiteswereidentifiedfortheSierraCountyportionoftheFERCProject.NoneofthepreviouslyrecordedsiteswithintheAPEhadbeenformallyevaluatedfortheNational Register of Historic Places (NRHP)atthetimeofthe2009recordssearch.Sincetherecordssearchesareoverfiveyearsold,anewrecordssearchwillbeconductedfortheAPEduringthefeasibilitystudy.ThefeasibilitystudywillhaveitsownAPEseparatefromtheFERCAPE. In2011and2012,YCWAconductedfieldsurveyswithintheentireexpandedFERCProjectAPEwhichwerecoordinatedwithUSForestServicearchaeologists.Becausetheprevioussurveysweremorethantenyearsold,itwasdecidedthattheentireAPEshouldberesurveyed.Anadditional31siteswererecorded.Thestudyidentifiedatotalof57archaeologicalsiteswithintheAPE.Of the 57 sites identified within the APE, twenty-three were prehistoric archaeological sites. Sixteen prehistoric sites were previously recorded prior to the 2011- 2012 surveys. Thirty-two historic sites were identified within the APE. Of the historic sites identified in the APE, eight were previously recorded. A total of two previously recorded multicomponent sites were identified within the FERC Project APE. Additionally, thearchaeologicalsurveyidentified13isolatedartifacts. YCWA evaluated both previously recorded and newly identified archaeological sites and built environment resources for their eligibility for listing on the NRHP when those resources could be evaluated at the inventory level. As a result, 10 archaeological sites and 16 built environment resources were evaluated as ineligible for listing on the NRHP and will require no further management upon SHPO NRHP eligibility concurrence with eligibility determinations. The New Colgate Powerhouse and Penstock are recommend as eligible for listing on the NRHP and will require SHPO NRHP eligibility concurrence. Of the 57 archaeological sites identified in the APE, 47 sites remain unevaluated for NRHP eligibility. In2000,USACEevaluatedDaguerrePointDamasnoteligibleforinclusiontotheNRHP.Theineligibilitydeterminationwasbasedonfourcriteria:A)thedam’sinsignificancewithrespecttoimportanthistoricalevents,namelytheCaliforniagoldrush,B)thelackofassociationwithsignificantpersons,C)thelackofuniqueconstructionmethodsor
36
style,andD)thedamisnotlikelytoyieldimportantinformation.Also,thedamlacksoverallintegrity,sinceitisa1965replacementstructure.TheSHPOwasnotconsultedregardingthepreviousNRHPeligibilitydetermination.This,alongwiththeresultsandrecommendationsfromthepedestriansurvey,needtobecoordinatedwiththeSHPOpriortoproceedingwithanyactualconstructionorground‐disturbingactivities. NativeAmericanResources
YCWAcontactedtheNativeAmericanHeritageCommissionin2009todeterminewhichNativeAmericanTribescouldhaveinterestintheProjectArea.ItisrecommendedthatanewTribalcontactlistbeobtainedfromtheNativeAmericanHeritageCommissiontoensurethatallinterestedTribeshavebeencontacted.YCWAconductedaNativeAmericanTraditionalCulturalProperties(TCP)studytodetermineiftheproposedstudyhadthepotentialtohave anadverseeffectonhistoricproperties,includingtraditionalculturalproperties(TCP)andethnographicresourcesthatqualifyforlistingontheNationalRegisterofHistoricPlaces(NRHP). TheAPEforthisFERCstudywasapproximately4,300acresandwhichoverlapsmostofthereconnaissancestudyarea.SincetheTCPstudywascompletedin2012,YCWAexpandedtheAPEto9,600acres,whichwasconcurredwithbytheSHPOin2013.YCWAconductedseveralconsultationmeetingswithtribesandagenciesbeginningin2009andcontinuinginto2012.ThestudydidnotidentifyanyTCPswithinorneartheFERCProjectAPE. AfterobtainingacurrentlistofTribeswithinterestinthestudyarea,USACEwillcontinuetoconsultaboutthefeasibilitystudywithinthefeasibilitystudyAPE. 12. FormulatingAlternativePlans
12.1. PreliminaryMeasures
Ameasureisafeatureoranactivitythatcanbeimplementedataspecificgeographiclocationtoaddressoneormoreplanningobjectives.Generally,measuresarecomponentsthataregroupedtogethertoformalternativeplans.Basedonpublishedreports,sitevisits,Corpsoperationsandmaintenance(O&M)actions,andcommunicationwiththelikelynon‐federalsponsorandstakeholders,belowisapreliminarylistofmeasuresarrangedbyobjectivefortheYubaRiver.Thesepreliminarymeasureshavebeenidentifiedasbeingconceptuallyrepresentativeofarangeofmeasuresfortherestorationofanadromousfishpopulationsand/ortheirhabitatwithintheYubaRiverWatershed.Thefinalformofameasuremaybedifferentthanwhatislistedbelow.However,regardlessoftheformofanyspecificmeasure,twooverarchingconsiderationswillbeassessedwhenfurtherdescribingand/orexamininganypotentialmeasureduringthefeasibilitystudy:(1)anysignificantreductioninthequalityofexistinganadromousfisherieshabitatbelowEnglebrightDamistobeavoided,asitwouldpotentiallyrepresentadegradationofexistingpopulations;and(2)giventhehighfloodriskthatcurrentlyexistsinmostoftheSacramentoRiverBasinandtheextensiveefforts(andtremendouscosts)currentlybeingexpendedtoimprovefloodprotection,anysignificantreductioninfloodmanagementcapabilityofthelowerYuba,Feather,orSacramentorivers
37
shouldbeconsideredunacceptable.ThiswouldincludeavoidingreleaseoflargequantitiesofsedimentfrombehindEnglebrightDam. AquaticHabitatConnectivity
� RemoveDaguerrePointDam� RemoveEnglebrightDam� ConstructsteppoolsuptoDaguerrePointDam� ConstructaseconddamassteptoEnglebrightDam� ReconstructfishladdersatDaguerrePointDam� InstallafullfishladderatEnglebrightDam� NotchEnglebrightDamandinstallapartialfishladder� ConstructafishbypassaroundDaguerrePointDam� ConstructafishbypassaroundEnglebrightDam� CollectandhaularoundEnglebrightDam� CollectandhaularoundNewBullardsBarDam� Hallwood‐Corduafishscreenimprovement� SouthYuba/Brophyfishscreenimprovement
HabitatRestoration� SinoroBarshot‐rockremoval,gravelplacement� Shot‐rockstabilization� DeerCreekgravelaugmentation� Gravelplacement� UpperRoseBarimprovementwithlocalgravel� Nativeriparianvegetationplanting� PredatorcontrolatDaguerrePointDamandingeneral� DaguerreAlleyside‐channel� Other/variousside‐channelconstruction� Ricefieldrearing� Floodplainrearinghabitatrestoration� Naturalhabitatfeatures(suchasrootwads,wholetrees,andwoodjams)installation� Engineeredrifflesorboulderfieldstoreducevelocitiesandrestorechannelcomplexity� Bioengineeringfeaturestofacilitatevegetationestablishment� Installnewsecurityfeaturesorreconstructexistingbarriers,etc.tolimitpublicaccess
(whereaccessiscurrentlyprohibited)atDaguerrePointDamtoreducepoaching. GeneticIntegrity
� Segregationstructure(weirorgate)forspring‐andfall‐runChinooksalmondownstreamofEnglebrightDam
� Segregationstructureforwildandhatcheryfish� CollectandhaularoundEnglebrightDam� CollectandhaularoundNewBullardsBarDamandReservoir� CoordinatedmanagementwithFeatherRiveroperationsandhatchery
12.1.1.ScreeningofMeasures
Apreliminaryscreeningoftheidentifiedmeasureswasdoneinanattempttoreducethe
38
numberofcandidatemeasuresbeforecombiningthemintopreliminaryalternatives.Forexample,theremovalofNewBullardsBarDamwasscreenedoutbecausedamremovalwouldeliminate170,000acre‐feetofdedicatedfloodstorage,thussignificantlyincreasingfloodrisk.Measureshadtoaddressatleastoneobjectiveandbepracticable.Forexample,wetlandrestorationandvernalpoolprotectionwereconsideredbutscreenedoutbecausetheydonotaddressoneofthethreemainobjectivesoffishhabitatconnectivity,riverineaquatichabitatrestoration,orsalmonidgeneticintegrity.MeasurestargetingtheGoldfieldswerenotretainedduetopracticability;atthistime,techniquesarelackingtorestorelargeamountsofcobbleintoriparianhabitat.Installationofahatcherywasscreenedoutbecauseitconflictswiththeobjectiveofmaintaininggeneticintegrity.Duringthefeasibilitystudy,themeasureslistedabove,aswellasanyadditionalmeasuresyettobeidentified,willbescreenedtodeterminewhethereachmeasureshouldberetainedforuseintheformulationofthealternativeplans.Screeningcriteriaduringthefeasibilityphasewilllikelyincludecosteffectiveness,whetherthemeasuremeetsmultipleobjectives,howwellthemeasurehasperformedatotherprojects(likelihoodofsuccess),andwhetherthemeasureisexpectedtobeconstructedbyanotherentity.Also,thefourplanningcriteriaofcompleteness,efficiency,effectiveness,andacceptabilitywillbeemployedtoscreenmeasuresandformulatealternatives.
12.2. AlternativeFormulationStrategies Analternativeformulationstrategyisamethodforgroupingmeasuresintoalternatives.Forthereconnaissancestudy,aformulationstrategybasedonfishpassagebarrierstosalmonids,classesofaquatichabitatrestoration,andriverreacheswasused.Barrierstosalmonidsarethedams,andbecausethedamsarelargestructuresandthecausesofthemajorproblemontheriver(fishpassage),itwaslogicalthatalternativesshouldbeformulatedtoaddressproblemsposedbythosestructures.Classesofaquatichabitatrestorationwerefocusedonsalmonidlifephase:spawningorjuvenilerearing.Lastly,riverreacheswereincludedintheformulationstrategysimplytoorganizefeaturesbylocation.Thealternativeformulationstrategywillbefinalizedduringthefeasibilityphaseofthestudy.Duringthefeasibilitystudy,theformulationstrategyorstrategieswillbedevelopedbasedonscoping.Throughscoping,stakeholderinputwillbesought.Someofthepreliminaryalternativespresentedinthisanalysismaybemodified,somemaybeeliminated,andstillotheradditionalalternativesmaybeadded. 13. ArrayofAlternatives
Forthepurposesofthisanalysis,ninepotentialalternativeswereconsidered,includingtheNoActionalternative.ThealternativesareintendedtodemonstrateminimumandmaximumconnectivitylevelsalongthereachesfromDaguerrePointDamtoEnglebrightDam,fromDaguerrePointDamtoNewBullardsBarDam,andfromDaguerrePointDamtotheNorthYubaRiverupstreamofNewBullardsBarDam.Operationofthecollect‐and‐haulmeasurewouldbeanO&Mrequirement,andthusundertakenbythenon‐federalsponsor.Quantifiablemetricstoevaluatealternativebenefits/outputswillbeidentifiedduringthefeasibilitystudy.ThepreliminaryarrayofalternativesalongwiththeirexpectedoutputsisshowninTable1.
39
Thepreliminaryalternativesweredevelopedbasedonseveralassumptions.Onewasassumingthatscreeningofmeasuresdonebyothergroups,suchastheYSFwasconsistentwiththeprocessUSACEwillfollow,sothatUSACEwouldreachthesameconclusions.Forinstance,completeremovalofEnglebrightDamwasnotincluded,asearlierstudieshaveindicateditwouldbecost‐prohibitive,especiallywithrespecttodisposingofthetoxiccontaminatedsedimentbehindit.
40
Table1.PreliminaryPotentialAlternatives.
Alternative Description Benefits/Outputs PreliminaryConstructionCostEstimate1
NoAction USACEwillnot construct a restoration project. 0 $01–DaguerretoEnglebright,MinimumConnectivity
� PlantriparianvegetationandplaceLWM.� ReconstructtheDaguerrefishladders.
� Minimalincreaseinconnectivity� 12milesofjuvenilehabitat�Noincrease in genetic integrity
$30‐40M
2–DaguerretoEnglebright,MinimumConnectivityplusSegregationFacility
Sameasabove withthe addition of:� segregationstructuretosortspringandfallruns,hatcheryfish,andwildsalmonids
� Minimalincreaseinconnectivity� 12milesofjuvenilehabitat� Increaseingeneticintegrity
$35‐50M
3a–DaguerretoEnglebright,MaximumConnectivity
� PlantriparianvegetationandplaceLWM.� ConstructbypasschannelatDaguerre(forgreensturgeon).
� Constructstep‐poolsforfishpassageatDaguerre.
� Moderateincreaseinconnectivity� 12milesofjuvenilehabitat� Noincreaseingeneticintegrity
$30‐60M
3b–DaguerretoEnglebright,MaximumConnectivityplusSegregationFacility
� PlantriparianvegetationandplaceLWM.� ConstructbypasschannelatDaguerre(forgreensturgeon).
� Constructstep‐poolsforfishpassageatDaguerre.
� Installasegregationstructure.
� Moderateincreaseinconnectivity� 12milesofjuvenilehabitat� Increaseingeneticintegrity
$30‐65M
3c–DaguerretoEnglebright,MaximumConnectivity,RemoveDaguerre
� PlantriparianvegetationandplaceLWM.� RemoveDaguerrePointDam(andrelocatediversions).
� Moderateincreaseinconnectivity� 12milesofjuvenilehabitat� Noincreaseingeneticintegrity
$125‐150M
4a–DaguerretoNewBullardsBar,MaximumConnectivityplusSegregationFacility
Sameas3bplus:� notchingEnglebrightDamandconstructingapartialladder
� Moderateincreaseinconnectivity� 30milesofjuvenilehabitat� Noincreaseingeneticintegrity
$100‐150M
4b–DaguerretoNewBullardsBar,MaximumConnectivity,RemoveDaguerreplusSegregationFacility
Sameas3cwith the additions of:� segregationstructure� notchingEnglebrightDamandconstructingapartialladder
� Moderateincreaseinconnectivity� 30milesofjuvenilehabitat� Increaseingeneticintegrity
$2.6‐2.7B
41
Alternative Description Benefits/Outputs PreliminaryConstructionCostEstimate1
5a–DaguerretoUpperYuba2,MaximumConnectivityplus
Sameas3awith the additionsof:� collectingandhaulingmigratingsalmonids� segregationstructure
� Maximumincreaseinconnectivity� 40+milesofjuvenilehabitat� Increaseingeneticintegrity
$270‐ 305M
5b–DaguerretoUpperYuba1,MaximumConnectivity,Daguerre
Sameas3cwith the additionsof:� collectingandhaulingmigratingsalmonids� segregationstructure
� Maximumincreaseinconnectivity� 40+milesofjuvenilehabitat� Increaseingeneticintegrity
$300‐500M
1Thesecostestimatesaregenerallypreparedbasedonverylimitedinformation,andtheyhavewideaccuracyranges.Theyareonlypresentedinthisanalysistoconveyrelativecostsamongalternatives.Actualcostestimateswillbedevelopedduringthefeasibilitystudy.
2UpperYubaextendspastNewBullardsBarReservoir.
42
Thecostrangeofthepreliminaryactionalternativesisestimatedtobe$30millionto$2.7billion.PreliminarycostswerebasedonotherYubaRiverstudies,suchasthe2013YSFFishPassageInfrastructureReport,otherCorpsestimatesfordifferentrestorationprojects,USForestServiceriverrestorationcosts,andlocalrestorationprojectslikeconstructionofasidechannelalongtheGreenRiverinKent,Washington. Inordertoevaluatethealternativesforthefeasibilitystudy,resultsofmonitoringoftheYubaRiverhabitatrepairworkalreadyunderwaybyUSACEaspartofitsO&Mactivitieswillbereviewed.Othercomparisonandevaluationcriteriainadditiontothatusedtoscreenmeasuresmayincludehowmuchanalternativeplanreducespredationandwhetheritaddstowatertemperaturemanagementcapability. Anyalternativethathasthepotentialtoreleasemercurythroughground‐orstreambed‐disturbingactivitieswillneedtobeinvestigatedfurther.Attemptswillbemadetoformulatealternativesthatavoidactionsthatcouldmakemercurybiologicallyavailable.However,ifremediationisrequiredbytheComprehensiveEnvironmentalResponse,Compensation,andLiabilityAct(CERCLA),financialresponsibilityforsuchremediationwillbedeterminedinaccordancewiththerequirementsofCERCLA,applicableregulationsandCorpspolicyasdescribedinEngineerRegulation1165‐2‐132. Additionally,severalecosystemrestorationmodelswillbeused.USACE’sEngineerResearchandDevelopmentCenter(ERDC)hasaconnectivitymodeltoevaluatefishpassagebarriers.TheForestService’sFishXingsoftwarecanbeusedtodesignaquaticorganismpassagefacilities.USACE’sInstituteforWaterResources(IWR)isdevelopingasalmon‐specificmodelforlargerfishpassageprojects.GregPasternakwiththeUniversityofCalifornia,Davisdevelopedanecohydraulic2‐dimensionalmodelusingSRH‐2DofthelowerYubaRiver.AUSFishandWildlifeService(FWS)HabitatEvaluationProcedure(HEP)modelforChinooksalmonmaybeused.IWRPlan,theCostEffectiveness/IncrementalCostAnalysis(CE/ICA)softwarefromtheIWRPlanningSuite,willbeusedtoevaluateandcomparealternatives.
13.1. EnvironmentalImpacts Therelativelevelsofpotentialenvironmentalimpactsforthepreliminaryalternativeswereestimatedbasedontheamountofground‐orstreambed‐disturbingworkthateachalternativewouldentail.Clearly,potentialenvironmentalimpactsneedtobequantifiedandanalyzedduringthefeasibilitystudy.Table2displaysthealternativesandthepreliminarilyexpectedlevelofimpactbycategory—“highs”arebolded. Mostimpactswouldbetemporaryduetoconstruction,includingimpactstobiologicalresources;somewildlifecouldbeaffectedduringconstructioninandalongtheriver.Negativeeffectswillbeminimizedbyschedulingworkaroundprotectivewindows,employingbestmanagementpracticesandadheringtoFederalandapplicablestateregulations.ModificationstoEnglebrightDamwouldlikelyaffecthydroelectricfacilities,sothoseeffectswouldhavetobefullyexplored,evaluated,andaddressedduringthefeasibilitystudy.
43
Table2.PreliminaryEnvironmentalImpactAssessment.Alternative ImpactCategory
Soils Land
AirQualit
WaterQuality
BiologicalResource
CulturalResource
Traffic Noise Recreation Aesthetics
NoAction None None None None None None None None None None1–DaguerretoEnglebright,Minimum
Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
2 – Daguerre toEnglebright, MinimumConnectivity plus
Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
3a–DaguerretoEnglebright,Maximum
High Low Low High High Low High Low Low Low
3b–DaguerretoEnglebright,MaximumConnectivityplus
High Low Low High High Low High Low Low Low
3c–DaguerretoEnglebright,MaximumConnectivity,Remove
High Low Low High High Low High Low Low Low
4a–DaguerretoNewBullardsBar,MaximumConnectivityplusSegregationFacility
High Low Low High High Low High High High Low
4b–DaguerretoNewBullardsBar,MaximumConnectivity,RemoveDaguerreplusSegregation
High Low Low High High Low High High High Low
5a–DaguerretoUpperYuba,MaximumConnectivityplus
High High High High High Low High High High Low
5b–DaguerretoUpperYuba,MaximumConnectivity,DaguerrePointDamRemovalplusSegregation
High High High High High Low High High High Low
44
14. KeyAssumptionsandUncertainties Inordertoscopethefeasibilitystudy,thefollowingassumptionsweremadeanduncertaintiesidentified.ThescopeofthefeasibilitystudywillbebasedontheseassumptionsaswellasanyothersidentifiedduringProjectManagementPlan(PMP)development.Uncertaintiesareitemsoractivitiesthatmaysignificantlyimpactthefeasibilitystudy;theycanchange,ordetailsarenotyetknown.ThesewillberefinedfurtherduringdevelopmentofthePMPandwillbedocumentedandqualifiedinariskregister. Assumptions:
� Ahighdegreeofstudy/projectmanagementcoordinationwillbeneededamongthestudyteam,includingthenon‐federalsponsor(s),andtheverticalteamandstakeholders.
� Thenon‐federalsponsororotherstakeholderswillsupplysomepreliminaryengineeringdesignworkandtechnicalsupport,whichwillbereviewedbyUSACEtoverifythatitmeetsFederalstandardsandrequirements.
� WatermanagementwithrespecttoanadromousfishspeciesisbeingaddressedthroughFERCrelicensingandtheYubaRiverAccord.
� EnvironmentalanalysiswillbeanEnvironmentalImpactStatement(EIS).
� Environmentalspecialistwillneedtocoordinatewithnon‐federalsponsoronCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)analysis.
� ThedecisiondocumentwillbeanintegratedfeasibilityreportandNEPA/CEQAdocument.
� Notopographic,bathymetric,orsoilsurveyswillbeconducted.
� AnMCACEScostestimatewillbeperformedontheselectedplanatalevelsuitableforafeasibilitystudy.
� Preliminarycostsareavailable.
� Dataonthelikelihoodofrestorationmeasuresuccessareavailableandappropriate.
� Duetosignificanttribalinterestonotherprojectsintheregionandnotduetoanyknowncontroversy,consultationeffortscouldbegreaterthanforsimilarfeasibilitystudies.
Uncertainties
� Damsafetyisnotknowntobeahighrisk.� Detailsandschedulesofotheractivities,includingrestorationactions,arenotfully
known.
45
15. Feasibility‐PhaseCostEstimateandSchedule ThefeasibilitystudywillbeaCorpsSMARTPlanningstudy,whereSMARTstandsforSpecific,Measurable,Attainable,Risk‐Informed,andTimely.Assuch,itwillmeetthe“3x3x3”planningrule:thestudywilltakenolongerthanthreeyearstoresultinasignedChief’sReportatacostnogreaterthan$3millionandinvolveallthreelevelsoftheorganization(district,division,headquarters). Thefeasibilitystudyisexpectedtocostapproximately$3million.Outofthe$3million,$150,000isa100%FederalcostforIEPR.Sotheremainingstudycosttobecost‐shared50%‐50%is$2.85million.Thenon‐federalsponsorwillpay$1.425million.TheFederalgovernmentwillpay$1.425millionplusthe$150,000forIEPRforatotalof$1.575million.ThecostestimatewillberefinedduringPMPdevelopment.ThecostestimateisbrokendownbydisciplineasshowninTable3below.(DistrictQualityControlisincludedwitheachdiscipline.) Table3.Preliminaryfeasibilitystudycostestimate.
Discipline Cost ($)ProjectManagement 500,000PlanFormulation 500,000Economics 70,000DamSafety 15,000FishBiology 150,000EnvironmentalPlanning 450,000CulturalResources 95,000HydraulicEngineering 270,000CivilDesign 100,000GeotechnicalEng. 100,000EnvironmentalEng. 100,000RealEstate 50,000TribalLiaison 50,000CostEngineering 120,000Operations 75,000AgencyTechnicalReviewTeam 100,000IEPR1 150,000Contingency 105,000
Total 3,000,0001IndependentExternalPeerReview
ThecostestimateisbasedonthecostofasimilarecosystemrestorationstudyinvolvingfishhabitatconnectivityanddamsaswellastheassumptionslistedinSection14.ItwillbefurtherrefinedduringthedevelopmentofthePMP.Althoughthepreliminaryoverallestimateofthecostofthefeasibilitystudyisanticipatedtoremainasindicated,significantre‐allocationamongthespecificdisciplineslistedabovemaybenecessary.Additionally,thedisciplineallocationmaychangeasaresultofnon‐Federalsponsorcostsharecontributions.
46
Belowisapreliminaryschedulebasedontheavailabilityoffullfunding,asimilarfeasibilitystudy,andstandardreviewdurations.
Action Date Duration
Sign FCSA Mar 2015 +1 month
Start Feasibility Study Apr 2015 +6 months
Alternatives Milestone Oct 2015 +1 year
Tentatively Selected Plan Milestone Oct 2016 +8 months
Agency Decision Milestone Jun 2017 +3 months
Final Report Milestone Sep 2017 +3 months
Civil Works Review Board Dec 2017 +3 months
Chief’s Report Mar 2018
16. Letter of Intent Asthenon‐federalsponsor,YCWAiswillingandabletopartnerinthe50/50cost‐shareofthefeasibilitystudyandfullyunderstandtheresponsibilitiesrequiredofanon‐federalsponsorforfeasibilitystudies.Thenon‐federalsponsorisalsoawareofthecost‐sharingrequirementsforpotentialprojectimplementation.ALetterofIntentfromthenon‐federalsponsorstatingawillingnesstopursethefeasibilitystudyandtoshareinitscost,andanunderstandingofthecost‐sharingthatisrequiredforprojectconstruction,isincludedasAttachmentA. 17. Recommendation IrecommendthattheYubaRiverEcosystemRestorationStudyproceedintothefeasibilityphase.ThisrecommendationisbasedonFederalinterest,consistencywithArmyandbudgetarypolicies,andthelikelihoodofaprojectmeetingcriteriaforFederalparticipationinprojectimplementation. Date MichaelJ.Farrell Colonel,U.S.Army DistrictCommander
AttachmentA–LetterofIntent
AttachmentB–Bibliography
Bibliography 1
YubaRiverEcosystem
Section905(b)AnalysisBibliography
Adams,P.B.,B.Churchill,J.E.Grimes,S.T.Hightower,S.T.Lindley,andM.L.Moser.2002.
NMFSStatusReviewforNorthAmericanGreenSturgeon. BeakConsultants,Inc.1989.YubaRiverFisheriesInvestigation,1986‐1988.Summary
ReportofTechnicalStudiesontheLowerYubaRiver,California.PreparedforSateofCaliforniaResourcesAgencyDepartmentofFishandGame.
Beamesderfer,R.C.P.,M.L.Simpson,andG.J.Kopp.2007.UseofLifeHistory
InformationinaPopulationModelforSacramentoGreenSturgeon.Environ.Biol.Fish.DOI10.1007/s10641‐006‐9145‐x.
CALFED. 2000. Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report. CALFED Bay-Delta Program. Prepared by the CALFED Bay-Delta Program for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the California Resources Agency. CALFEDandYCWA.2005.DraftImplementationPlanforLowerYubaRiverAnadromous
FishHabitatRestoration.Multi‐AgencyPlantoDirectNear‐TermImplementationofPrioritizedRestorationandEnhancementActionsandStudiestoAchieveLong‐TermEcosystemandWatershedManagementGoals.PreparedbyLowerYubaRiverFisheriesTechnicalWorkingGroup.
CDFG.1991.SteelheadRestorationPlanfortheAmericanRiver. CDFG.1998.ReporttotheFishandGameCommission:AStatusReviewoftheSpring‐Run
ChinookSalmon(Oncorhynchustshawytscha)intheSacramentoRiverDrainage.CandidateSpeciesStatusReport98‐01.
CDFW.2010.CaliforniaSalmonidStreamHabitatRestorationManual.
https://www.dfg.ca.gov/fish/resources/habitatmanual.asp.AccessedSep2014. Churchill,R.K.2000.ContributionsofmercurytoCalifornia'senvironmentfrom
mercuryandgoldminingactivities;Insightsfromthehistoricalrecord,inExtendedabstractsfortheU.S.EPAsponsoredmeeting,AssessingandManagingMercuryfromHistoricandCurrentMiningActivities.
DWR.2004.EvaluationoftheFeatherRiverHatcheryEffectsonNaturally
SpawningSalmonids. DWRUpperYubaRiverStudiesProgramStudyTeam.2007.UpperYubaRiver
Bibliography 2
WatershedChinookSalmonandSteelheadHabitatAssessment. Klimley,A.P.,P.J.Allen,J.A.Israel,andJ.T.Kelly.2007.TheGreenSturgeonandIts
Environment:Past,Present,andFuture.EnvironmentalBiologyofFishes.Volume79:415‐421.
Krueper,D.J.1993.EffectsoflandusepracticesonWesternriparianecosystems.Pages
321‐330inStatusandmanagementofNeotropicalmigratorybirds.USDAForestService,RockyMountainForestandRangeExperimentStation.
Lindley,S.T.,R.S.Schick,E.Mora,P.B.Adams,J.J.Anderson,S.Greene,C.Hanson,B.P.May,D.McEwan,R.B.MacFarlane,C.Swanson,andJ.G.Williams.2007.FrameworkforAssessingViabilityofThreatenedandEndangeredChinookSalmonandSteelheadinthe Sacramento‐SanJoaquinBasin.SanFranciscoEstuaryandWatershedScience.Volume5(1):26Article4.
McEwan,D.andT.A.Jackson.1996.SteelheadRestorationandManagementPlan
forCalifornia.CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame. Mount,J.F.1995.CaliforniaRiversandStreams: TheConflictBetweenFluvialProcess
andLandUse.UniversityCaliforniaPress,Berkeley,California. Moyle,P.B.2002.InlandFishesofCalifornia.UniversityofCaliforniaPress,Berkeleyand
LosAngeles,California. NMFS.2002.BiologicalOpinionontheEffectsofUSACE’OperationofEnglebrightDamand
DaguerrePointDamontheYubaRiver,inYubaandNevadaCounties,California,ontheThreatenedCentralValleySpring‐RunChinookSalmon(Oncorhynchustshawtscha),theCentralValleySteelhead(0.mykiss)andTheirRespectiveDesignatedCriticalHabitats.
NMFS.2005.BiologicalOpinionBasedonReviewoftheProposedYubaRiverDevelopment
ProjectLicenseAmendmentforFederalEnergyRegulatoryCommissionLicenseNumber2246,LocatedontheYubaRiverinYubaCounty,California,andItsEffectsonThreatenedCentralValleySpring‐RunChinookSalmon(Oncorhynchustshawytscha)andCentralValleySteelhead(O.mykiss),inAccordanceWithSection7oftheEndangeredSpeciesActof1973,AsAmended.
NMFS.2007.FinalBiologicalOpinionontheEffectsofOperationofEnglebrightand
DaguerrePointDamsontheYubaRiver,California,onThreatenedCentralValleySteelhead,theRespectiveDesignatedCriticalHabitatsfortheseSalmonidSpecies,andtheThreatenedSouthernDistinctPopulationSegmentofNorthAmericanGreenSturgeon.November2007.
NMFS.2009.EndangeredandThreatenedWildlife andPlants: FinalRulemaking
Bibliography 3
To Designate Critical Habitat for the Threatened Southern DistinctPopulationSegmentofNorthAmericanGreenSturgeon;FinalRule.
NMFS.2012.FinalBiologicalOpinionontheU.S.ArmyCorpsofEngineers’Continued
OperationandMaintenanceofEnglebrightDamandReservoir,DaguerrePointDam,andRecreationalFacilitiesOnandAroundEnglebrightReservoir.
NMFS.2014.PacificSalmonids:MajorThreatsandImpacts.
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/fish/salmon.htm.AccessedAugust2014.
NMFS2014a.RecoveryPlanforSacramentoRiverwinter‐runChinooksalmon,
CentralValleyspring‐runChinooksalmon,andCentralValleysteelhead. NMFS.2014b.FinalBiologicalOpinionontheU.S.ArmyCorpsofEngineers’Operation
andMaintenanceforDaguerrePointDamontheYubaRiver. NMFS.2014c.LetterofConcurrencefortheU.S.ArmyCorpsofEngineers’
OperationandMaintenanceforEnglebrightReservoirontheYubaRiver. Pasternack,G.B.2010.Gravel/CobbleAugmentationImplementationPlan(GAIP)
for19theEnglebrightDamReachoftheLowerYubaRiver,CA.PreparedfortheU.S.20ArmyCorpsofEngineersSacramentoDistrict.
Potter,D.A.2005.Riparianplantcommunityclassification:westslope,centraland
southernSierraNevada,California.Gen.Tech.Rep.R5‐TP‐022.Albany,CA:U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,ForestService.PacificSouthwestRegion.630p.
Reisenbichler,R.R.andS.P.Rubin.1999.GeneticChangesfromHatcheryPropagation
AffectProductivityandViabilityofWildPopulations.ICESJournalofMarineScience,56:459‐466.
Reynolds,F.L.,Mills,T.J.,Benthin,R.,andLow,A.1993.RestoringCentralValleyStreams:A
PlanforAction.CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame,InlandFisheriesDivision.Sacramento,California.
RiverManagementTeam(RMT).2013.AquaticResourcesoftheLowerYubaRiver–Past,
Present&Future,YubaAccordMonitoringandEvaluationProgram,DraftInterimReport.April2013.
RMT.2010.RiverManagementTeamTechnicalMemorandum:LowerYubaRiverWater
TemperatureObjectives.November2010. SWRI,JSA,andBookman‐EdmonstonEngineering,Inc.2000.HearingExhibitS‐YCWA‐19.
Bibliography 4
ExpertTestimonyonYubaRiverFisheriesIssuesbySurfaceWaterResources,Inc.,Junes&StokesAssociates,andBookman‐EdmonstonEngineering,Inc.,AquaticandEngineeringSpecialistsforYubaCountyWaterAgency.PreparedfortheCaliforniaState WaterResourcesControlBoardWaterRightsHearingonLowerYubaRiver.
USACE.2013.BiologicalAssessmentforOperationandMaintenanceforDaguerrePoint
DamontheYubaRiver. USACE.2013.BiologicalAssessmentforOperationandMaintenanceforEnglebright
ReservoirontheYubaRiver.UnitedStatesForestService(USFS)TahoeNationalForest.2014.Willow
Flycatcher–Introduction.http://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/tahoe/landmanagement/
resourcemanagement/?cid=stelprdb5357314 Vogel,D.A.andK.R.Marine.1991.GuidetoUpperSacramentoRiverChinookSalmonLife
History.U.S.BureauofReclamationCentralValleyProject. YCWA,DWR,andReclamation.2007.DraftEnvironmentalImpactReport/Environmental
ImpactStatementfortheProposedLowerYubaRiverAccord.StateClearinghouse(SCH)No: 005062111.PreparedbyHDR|SurfaceWaterResources,Inc.
YCWA.2010.Pre‐ApplicationDocument,YubaCountyWaterAgencyYubaRiver
DevelopmentProjectFERCProjectNo.2246. YCWA.2012.TechnicalMemorandum13‐1:TraditionalCulturalProperties,YubaCounty
WaterAgencyYubaRiverDevelopmentProjectFERCProjectNo.2246. YCWA.2013.TechnicalMemorandum12‐1:HistoricProperties,YubaCountyWaterAgency
YubaRiverDevelopmentProjectFERCProjectNo.2246.YCWA.2014.YubaRiverDevelopmentProjectFinalLicenseApplicationforFERCProjectNo.2246.
April2014.http://www.ycwa‐relicensing.com/Relicensing%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2fRelicensing%20Documents%2fRelicensing%20Documents%2009%20%2d%20Final%20License%20Application&FolderCTID=&View=%7b31B99738%2dB3DA%2d4CD0%2dA63E%2d01898DE55BAB%7d
Yoshiyama,R.M.,F.W.Fisher,andP.B.Moyle.1998.HistoricalAbundanceandDeclineof
ChinookSalmonintheCentralValleyRegionofCalifornia.NorthAmericanJournalofFisheriesManagement.Volume18:487‐521.
Yoshiyama,R.M.,E.R.Gerstung,F.W.Fisher,andP.B.Moyle.2001.HistoricalandPresent
DistributionofChinookSalmonintheCentralValleyDrainageofCalifornia.ContributionstotheBiologyofCentralValleySalmonids.FishBulletin179,Volume1.
Bibliography 5
YubaSalmonForum(YSF).2013.SummaryHabitatAnalysis.PreparedfortheYubaSalmonForumTechnicalWorkingGroup.PreparedbyCraigAddley,PhD(CardnoENTRIX),KatieRoss‐Smith,PhD(CardnoENTRIX),andPeterGraf(CardnoENTRIX.September2013.
YSF.(2013).AssessmentofInfrastructureandRelatedItemstoSupportAnadromous
FishPassagetotheYubaRiverWatershed,PreparedbyMWHfortheYubaSalmonForum.March2013.