Post on 29-Mar-2015
www.mdsmokefreeapartments.org
Health Impact “There is no safe level of exposure to tobacco smoke” –
Report of the Surgeon General (2010) Secondhand smoke can have 80-90% of the health impact
of chronic smoking (J. Barnoya, MD, MPH (2005))
Economic Impact Reduce property owners/managers maintenance and
turnover costs Reduce health care and loss of life costsReduce insurance premiums Limit liability for owners/managers
Safety Impact Reduce risk of residential fire
Protection From Secondhand Smoke Secondhand smoke (SHS) contains more than 7,000
identifiable compounds released as gases or particles, including at least 70 known cancer causing compounds
50,000 nonsmokers die each year from cancer caused by SHS
Even brief exposure increases the risk of respiratory infections, ear problems and asthma, especially in children and other health vulnerable populations
“At present, the only means of effectively eliminating health risks associated with indoor exposure is to ban smoking activity.” - American Society of Heating, Refrigerating & Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
Lower Costs 2012 Indiana study estimates SHS leads to health care and
loss of life costs in excess of $1.3 billion annually
HUD estimates that apartment turnover costs are 2 to 7 times greater when smoking is permitted
A survey of housing authorities and subsidized housing facilities in New England found the cost to rehabilitate a smoking unit was $1,500 to $3,000 more than a non-smoking unit
Some insurance companies offer discounts on property casualty insurance for multi-unit owners with a smoke-free policy
No Smoking Light Smoking Heavy Smoking
General Cleaning
$240 $500 $720
Paint $170 $225 $480
Flooring $50 $950 $1,425
Appliances $60 $75 $490
Bathroom $40 $60 $400
TOTAL $560 $1,810 $3,515
Source: Smoke-Free Housing New England, 2009
Reduce Risk of Fire Smoking is among the leading causes of
residential fires in multi-unit buildings and the number one cause of fire deaths in the U.S. (Source: National Fire Protection Association)
National Fire Protection Association 2010 Data:◦ 17,500 smoking related residential fires
◦ 540 civilian deaths
◦ 1,320 civilian injuries
◦ $535 million in direct property damage #1 NFPA Recommendation to avoid residential
fires: “If you smoke, smoke outside”
Soaring Demand Only 18% of American adults
smoke, and roughly half that total smoke in the home
8 out of 10 asked in a multi-state survey indicate they would prefer to live in a smoke-free complex
1 out of 2 say they have moved or would move because of tobacco smoke drift
NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKEProponents of smokers’ rights often argue that smoke-free laws or policies:
◦ Violate an individual’s constitutional right to privacy; or◦ Discriminate against smokers in violation of the Equal
Protection Clause
All courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, considering the issue have found:
◦ Smoking is not a protected liberty, and ◦ Smokers are not a protected class of people
Important Note: Several state constitutions include a broader protections than the federal constitution; however, no state court has found smoking is a constitutionally protected right.
No smoking laws and policies do NOT violate the right to privacy
The Constitution protects the “fundamental right to privacy,” and any law encroaching upon this right must pass a heightened level of court scrutiny
The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly held the fundamental right to privacy only applies to marriage, intimate relationships and rearing of children
No court has extended the right to include smoking
No smoking laws and policies do NOT discriminate against smokers
The Equal Protection Clause guarantees “equal protection of the laws,” meaning a law cannot treat groups of people differently without adequate justification
Laws discriminating against an inherent characteristic (i.e. gender or race) are rarely upheld, but laws discriminating against other groups need only be “rationally related to a legitimate government goal.”
NO FEDERAL LAW PROHIBITS SMOKE-FREE LAWS OR POLICIESAll 50 states (and the District of Columbia) have the authority to enact smoke-free housing laws
No federal or state law prohibits an owner, property manager or housing authority from making their apartment building smoke-free
Family Smoking and Tobacco Control Act (2009)Sec. 916. Preservation of State and Local Authority.“Nothing…shall be construed to limit the authority of a…State or political subdivision of a State…to enact, adopt, promulgate, and enforce any law, rule, regulation or other measure with respect to tobacco products that is in addition to, or more stringent than, requirements established under this chapter, including a law, rule, regulation or other measure relating to or prohibiting the sale, distribution, possession, exposure to, access to, advertising and promotion of, or use of tobacco products by individuals of any age…”
PHAs/SECTION 8/SUBSIDIZED HOUSING Since July 2009 HUD has issued three notices addressing the
benefits and legality of smoke-free public housing.
Most recently, HUD issued Notice H 2012-22 which “strongly encourages Public Housing Authorities to implement smoke-free policies”
“The right to smoke or not to smoke is not a right that is protected under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because smokers a not a protected class under federal law.” – U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
HUD notices applies to all Multifamily Housing rental assistance programs
Smoke-free policies are optional, but HUD established several requirements for those PHAs that choose to adopt these policies, including:
Update the House Rules and Policies and Procedures Be in accordance with state/local law Notify applicants of smoke-free policy and provide at
least 30 days notice to existing residents No individual can be denied occupancy because they
smoke Cannot ask an applicant or resident if they smoke or
anyone in their household smokes
Over 350 Public Housing Authorities in at least 30 states have implemented smoke-free policies (more than 10% of national total), including:
Boston, MA Detroit, MI Seattle, WA Santa Barbara, CA San Antonio, TX Santa Fe, NM Portland, OR All Maine Public Housing (12,000 residents)
Use the same warning/enforcement methods for smoking rule violations that are used for any other rule.
Proliferation of smoke-free policies has not led to large numbers of evictions. In both market rate and subsidized housing, compliance rates are very high.
Individuals are not being asked to quit, just refrain from smoking indoors – HUD clearly requires that residents may not be denied occupancy because they smoke
Global Advisors on Smokefree Policy http://www.njgasp.org/
Tobacco Control Legal Consortium http://www.tclconline.org/
The Center for Social Gerontology http://www.tcsg.org/
Smoke-Free Apartment House Registry http://www.smokefreeapartments.org/
MD Smoke-Free Apartments www.mdsmokefreeapartments.org
Legal Resource Center for Public Health Policy University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law500 West Baltimore StreetBaltimore, MD 21201(410) 706-0842tobacco@law.umaryland.edu