Writers Summit 09 - Why eDiscovery is a ProblemRalph Losey

Post on 17-Aug-2015

309 views 1 download

Tags:

Transcript of Writers Summit 09 - Why eDiscovery is a ProblemRalph Losey

Why e-Discovery is a Problem:Searching for Truth and Justice in

Chaotic Disconnected Information Silos

Ralph C. Losey

Friday, June 5, 2009

Lawyer: Shareholder and Chair of Akerman Senterfitt's e-Discovery Practice Group

30 years Litigation experience; last 3, only e-Discovery

Adjunct Professor, Univ. of Florida, School of Law, on e-discovery

Author: Introduction to e-Discovery: New Cases, Ideas and Techniques (ABA 2009)

E-Discovery: Current Trends and Cases (ABA 2008)

HASH: the New Bates Stamp, 12 Journal Technology Law & Policy 1 (June 2007)

Websites: e-Discovery Team (weekly blog): www.ralphlosey.wordpress.com

www.FloridaLawFirm.com (personal web on IT and Law)

Why e-Discovery is a Problem:Searching for Truth and Justice in

Chaotic Disconnected Information Silos

Ralph C. Losey

Friday, June 5, 2009

Lawyer: Shareholder and Chair of Akerman Senterfitt's e-Discovery Practice Group

30 years Litigation experience; last 3, only e-Discovery

Adjunct Professor, Univ. of Florida, School of Law, on e-discovery

Author: Introduction to e-Discovery: New Cases, Ideas and Techniques (ABA 2009)

E-Discovery: Current Trends and Cases (ABA 2008)

HASH: the New Bates Stamp, 12 Journal Technology Law & Policy 1 (June 2007)

Websites: e-Discovery Team (weekly blog): www.ralphlosey.wordpress.com

www.FloridaLawFirm.com (personal web on IT and Law)

Why e-Discovery is a Problem:Searching for Truth and Justice in

Chaotic Disconnected Information Silos

Ralph C. Losey

Friday, June 5, 2009

The Failure of Business to Adopt ECM is Destroying American System of Justice

No Justice Without Truth.

No truth if you cannot find the relevant evidence.

Friday, June 5, 2009

The Failure of Business to Adopt ECM is Destroying American System of Justice

No Justice Without Truth.

No truth if you cannot find the relevant evidence.

Friday, June 5, 2009

The Failure of Business to Adopt ECM is Destroying American System of Justice

No Justice Without Truth.

No truth if you cannot find the relevant evidence.

Friday, June 5, 2009

The Failure of Business to Adopt ECM is Destroying American System of Justice

No Justice Without Truth.

No truth if you cannot find the relevant evidence.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Most Trial lawyers Are Luddites

Friday, June 5, 2009

Most Trial lawyers Are Luddites

Friday, June 5, 2009

Most Trial lawyers Are Luddites

Friday, June 5, 2009

Most Trial lawyers Are Luddites

Friday, June 5, 2009

Most Trial lawyers Are Luddites

Friday, June 5, 2009

Most Trial lawyers Are Luddites

Friday, June 5, 2009

Here is what we all want.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Here is what we all want.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Collection

Productio Presentat

ReviewTranslucent FillInformationManagement

Preservation

Collection

Analysis

Processing

Translucent FillPresentation

Analysis

IdentificaInforamat

Volume Relevance

Volume Relevance

ProductionIdentification

Friday, June 5, 2009

Electronic Discovery Reference Model

Collection

Productio Presentat

ReviewTranslucent FillInformationManagement

Preservation

Collection

Analysis

Processing

Translucent FillPresentation

Analysis

IdentificaInforamat

Volume Relevance

Volume Relevance

ProductionIdentification

Friday, June 5, 2009

In re Fannie Mae Securities Litigation _ F.3d _, 2009 WL 215282009, (D.C. App. Jan. 6, 2009).

Friday, June 5, 2009

In re Fannie Mae Securities Litigation _ F.3d _, 2009 WL 215282009, (D.C. App. Jan. 6, 2009).

Friday, June 5, 2009

In re Fannie Mae Securities Litigation _ F.3d _, 2009 WL 215282009, (D.C. App. Jan. 6, 2009).

‣$6 Million to Comply with an e-Discovery Subpoena

Friday, June 5, 2009

In re Fannie Mae Securities Litigation _ F.3d _, 2009 WL 215282009, (D.C. App. Jan. 6, 2009).

‣$6 Million to Comply with an e-Discovery Subpoena‣9% of Total Annual Budget of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight

Friday, June 5, 2009

In re Fannie Mae Securities Litigation _ F.3d _, 2009 WL 215282009, (D.C. App. Jan. 6, 2009).

‣$6 Million to Comply with an e-Discovery Subpoena‣9% of Total Annual Budget of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight‣400 keywords; 660,000 emails and attachments; 80% of all agency’s email

Friday, June 5, 2009

Today’s headlines

Friday, June 5, 2009

Today’s headlines

‣Former Countrywide Financial Corp. Chief Executive Officer Angelo Mozilo and two of his top deputies were sued by the SEC for allegedly hiding the home lender’s deteriorating finances as the subprime mortgage crisis unfolded.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Today’s headlines

‣Former Countrywide Financial Corp. Chief Executive Officer Angelo Mozilo and two of his top deputies were sued by the SEC for allegedly hiding the home lender’s deteriorating finances as the subprime mortgage crisis unfolded.

‣In one e-mail, he described a “particularly profitable subprime product as ‘toxic.’” He also wrote that Countrywide was “flying blind” and had “no way” to determine the risks of some adjustable-rate mortgages, the SEC said.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Review is Expensive

Friday, June 5, 2009

Review is Expensive

Friday, June 5, 2009

Review is Expensive

Friday, June 5, 2009

Review is Expensive

Cost to Review now runs about $5.00 per computer file.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Review is Expensive

Cost to Review now runs about $5.00 per computer file.

Can range from $3.00 to $10.00 per file; Fannie Mae was $9.09

Friday, June 5, 2009

Review is Expensive

Cost to Review now runs about $5.00 per computer file.

Can range from $3.00 to $10.00 per file; Fannie Mae was $9.09Review for relevance, privilege, confidentiality, issue tagging and Logging

Friday, June 5, 2009

Review is Expensive

Cost to Review now runs about $5.00 per computer file.

Can range from $3.00 to $10.00 per file; Fannie Mae was $9.09Review for relevance, privilege, confidentiality, issue tagging and LoggingAver 16,000 files per gig = $80,000

Friday, June 5, 2009

Review is Expensive

Cost to Review now runs about $5.00 per computer file.

Can range from $3.00 to $10.00 per file; Fannie Mae was $9.09Review for relevance, privilege, confidentiality, issue tagging and LoggingAver 16,000 files per gig = $80,000

the following facts are Typical:

Friday, June 5, 2009

Review is Expensive

Cost to Review now runs about $5.00 per computer file.

Can range from $3.00 to $10.00 per file; Fannie Mae was $9.09Review for relevance, privilege, confidentiality, issue tagging and LoggingAver 16,000 files per gig = $80,000

the following facts are Typical:20 Custodians with 50,000 emails/attachments each = One Million ESI

Friday, June 5, 2009

Review is Expensive

Cost to Review now runs about $5.00 per computer file.

Can range from $3.00 to $10.00 per file; Fannie Mae was $9.09Review for relevance, privilege, confidentiality, issue tagging and LoggingAver 16,000 files per gig = $80,000

the following facts are Typical:20 Custodians with 50,000 emails/attachments each = One Million ESIECM - weak or non-existent for email.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Review is Expensive

Cost to Review now runs about $5.00 per computer file.

Can range from $3.00 to $10.00 per file; Fannie Mae was $9.09Review for relevance, privilege, confidentiality, issue tagging and LoggingAver 16,000 files per gig = $80,000

the following facts are Typical:20 Custodians with 50,000 emails/attachments each = One Million ESIECM - weak or non-existent for email.Relevance Search Culling reduces down to 10% = 100,000 ESI to be produced.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Review is Expensive

Cost to Review now runs about $5.00 per computer file.

Can range from $3.00 to $10.00 per file; Fannie Mae was $9.09Review for relevance, privilege, confidentiality, issue tagging and LoggingAver 16,000 files per gig = $80,000

the following facts are Typical:20 Custodians with 50,000 emails/attachments each = One Million ESIECM - weak or non-existent for email.Relevance Search Culling reduces down to 10% = 100,000 ESI to be produced.Client still cannot afford $500,000 just to review emails.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Science of Search

Friday, June 5, 2009

Science of Search

‣Recall and Precision

Friday, June 5, 2009

Science of Search

‣Recall and Precision‣ In searching for potentially responsive documents, iterative validation should MINIMIZE false negatives and false positives.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Science of Search

‣Recall and Precision‣ In searching for potentially responsive documents, iterative validation should MINIMIZE false negatives and false positives.‣Jason baron - TREC Legal Track

Friday, June 5, 2009

Science of Search

‣Recall and Precision‣ In searching for potentially responsive documents, iterative validation should MINIMIZE false negatives and false positives.‣Jason baron - TREC Legal Track‣ traditional Negotiated

Keyword Search Usually Sucks (22% recall)

Friday, June 5, 2009

Science of Search

‣Recall and Precision‣ In searching for potentially responsive documents, iterative validation should MINIMIZE false negatives and false positives.‣Jason baron - TREC Legal Track‣ traditional Negotiated

Keyword Search Usually Sucks (22% recall)‣ Multimodal and iterative

Sampling is the way

Friday, June 5, 2009

Science of Search

‣Recall and Precision‣ In searching for potentially responsive documents, iterative validation should MINIMIZE false negatives and false positives.‣Jason baron - TREC Legal Track‣ traditional Negotiated

Keyword Search Usually Sucks (22% recall)‣ Multimodal and iterative

Sampling is the way

‣Judgmental and Random Sampling

Friday, June 5, 2009

Metrics and new Technologies/Methods

In re: Seroquel Products Liability Litigation, 244 F.R.D. 650 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 21, 2007). “Common sense dictates that sampling and other quality assurance techniques must be employed to meet requirements of completeness. If AZ took such steps, it has not identified or validated them.”

Friday, June 5, 2009

QUESTIONS?

Friday, June 5, 2009

QUESTIONS?

Friday, June 5, 2009