Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

Post on 16-Apr-2017

1.261 views 0 download

Transcript of Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

3D Printing State of the Art: IndustrialJohn Hornick

April 2016

What Is It?

3

What Is It? Not Yoda head

4

What Is It? Not Yoda head

The Name Game

6

The Name Game AKA:

– 3D printing– Additive Manufacturing

(AM)– Direct Digital Manufacturing– Rapid prototyping

7

The Name Game

3D Printing v. AM

8

The Name Game

Subtractive v. Additive

9

The Name Game

Subtractive v. Additive– old v. new

10

The Name Game

Subtractive v. Additive– old v. new– injection molding, casting, weaving

11

The Name Game

Subtractive v. Additive– old v. new– injection molding, casting, weaving

old and additive

12

The Name Game 3D printing/AM v. “traditional”

13

The Name Game 3D printing/AM v. “traditional”

14

The Name Game

SLA SLS

DMLSDLP

FFFFDM

15

The Name GameBinder jettingDirected energy depositionMaterial extrusionMaterial jettingPowder bed fusionSheet laminationVat photopolymerization

3DP Today

17

3DP Today

Price Range:

ASP:

Industrial Base:

18

3DP Today

Price Range: $5K to $5M

ASP:

Industrial Base:

19

3DP Today

Price Range: $5K to $2M

ASP: $87K ($90K)Industrial Base:

20

3DP Today

Price Range: $5K to $2M

ASP: $87K ($90K)

Industrial Base: ~80K

21

3DP Today

Binder Jetting

23

Binder Jetting aka Digital Part Materialization

24

Binder Jetting

Materials: – polymer, metal, glass, sand

Post-processing: curing, sintering, infiltration

Color (in plastic)

25

Binder Jetting: Plastics

3D Systems ProJet (US)

acrylate powder infiltrated with cyanoacrylate full color parts $16K to $114K

26

Binder Jetting: Plastics

Voxeljet (Germany) continuous build acrylic polymer, sand

room temperature cure (no heat distortion) $150K to $1.8 million

27

Binder Jetting: Metals

ExOne (US) 2.5 x 1.6 x 1.3 ft. Bronze, Inconel, iron, stainless steel, tungsten, glass, sand Post-processing: Metal parts:

– sintered – binder burned out– infiltrated with bronze

$145K to $1.6 million

28

Binder Jetting: Metals Hoganas (Sweden)

– Small– Precise

29

Binder Jetting: Licenses Developed by MIT (“3D Printing”)

– Licensed to: ExOne Z Corp.

–(acquired by 3D Systems)

– Sublicensed: 3D Systems to Voxeljet

Directed Energy Deposition

31

Directed Energy Deposition aka:

–Blown Powder AM–Laser Cladding

–$350K to $1.5M

32

Directed Energy Deposition Optomec (US)

– Laser Engineered Netshaping (LENS) ≤ 3 x 5 x 3 ft. ≤ 1 kW

33

Directed Energy Deposition LENS

– Multi-metals simultaneously graded materials/parts on the fly

– Multi-axis head– Unlimited substrates

34

Directed Energy Deposition– Sciaky (US)

Electron beam (EBAM) Wire feedstock 9 x 4 x 5 ft.

Titanium, tantalum, Inconel, SS, Cobalt alloys, Nickel alloys, copper nickel alloys

Fast Very rough parts

35

Directed Energy Deposition– Accufusion “Laser

Consolidation”– AM3D– BeAM (Irepa Laser)

“EasyCLAD”– eFesto “Laser

Cladding”

– Honeywell Aerospace “Ion Fusion Formation”

– INSSTek– NASA/Penn State

Radiant Deposition– Trumpf TruLaser– Xi’an Bright Laser

Technologies (China)

36

Hybrids DMG Mori Sieki

Germany/Japan

– Laser Deposition Welding DED 5-axis mill 25” x 25” x 22” 2 kW

37

Hybrids Yamazaki Mazak

DED

Milling

Interchangeable tool heads

38

New on the Block Toshiba:

– 2017– Laser Metal Deposition– 10x PBF– large parts– 110cc/hr

Material Extrusion

40

Material Extrusion aka:

– Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)

– Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)

41

Material Extrusion

Post-processing: removal of supports, surface finishing

Prototypes, simple plastic parts Most-used process

42

Material Extrusion Thermoplastics

– ABS– PLA– Polycarbonate– PC/ABS blend– Helian/Eastman

ColorFabb XT– ULTEM

43

Material Extrusion Consumer:

– 2009: watershed– ~300– $500 to $5000

44

Material Extrusion Stratasys/Objet (US/Israel)

– Filament spools ABS PLA Support material

– $9500 to $500K

45

Material Extrusion Arburg (Germany) “Freeformer”

– Stationery nozzle– 3/5 axis– Deposits droplets at high speed

Similar to BPM– Thermoplastic pellets

Material Jetting

47

Material Jetting Types:

– Aerosol Jet/Direct write– Cold Spray– Ballistic Particle Manufacturing (BPM)– Polyjet

48

Material Jetting

Aerosol Jet/Direct Write

2.5D

49

Material Jetting

Post-processing: heat or chemical treatment

Unlimited:

substrates

shapes

Circuitry

Extreme precision

$200K to $500K

50

Material Jetting Direct Write companies:

– Optomec (US) Aerosol Jet– Lawrence Livermore (US)– nScrypt (US)– CamTek (Israel)– Nano Dimension (Israel)– Neotech (Germany)– XJet “Nano Metal Jetting” (Israel)– Argentum (US)

51

Material Jetting Cold Spray

– CSIRO

– Flexible Robotic Environments– Trinity College

52

Material Jetting Ballistic Particle Manufacturing (BPM)

– Build method: inkjet-like nozzle fires thermoplastic at high speed solidified into desired shape

– Applns: prototyping

53

Material Jetting Companies:

– BPM, South Carolina (defunct)– Incremental Fabrication Technologies

(defunct?) metal particles

– Similar to: cold spray Arburg Freeformer

54

Hybrids Hermle MPA 40

– Thermal metal spray 3X

– 5 axis CNC– Intermediate milling– Alloys on the fly

55

Material Jetting Polyjet

56

Material Jetting– Materials: photopolymers, casting materials,

support– Multi and graded materials on the fly

– Post-processing: remove supports, extra powder– Finished parts

57

Material Jetting Multi-jet Modeling

– Multi materials in different proportions Some ProJet machines (5500X)

– $60K to $225K

58

Material Jetting

J750–Digital materials–6 different resins–360,000 colors–2X

Powder Bed Fusion

60

Powder Bed Fusion

61

Powder Bed Fusion aka Laser Melting

– Direct Metal Printing (DMP) (3D Systems/Phenix, U.S.)

– Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) (EOS, Germany)

– Metal Laser Melting (MLM) (Renishaw (UK)) Licensed by EOS for U.S.

– Selective Laser Melting (SLM)(SLM Solutions, Germany) Licensed by EOS for U.S.

– Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) (Fonon, US)

– laserCUSING (Concept Laser, Germany)

62

Powder Bed Fusion Other companies:

– Aspect (Japan)– Beijing Longyuan (China)– Blueprinter (Denmark)

(Selective Heat Sintering)– Hunan Farsoon (China)– Realizer (Germany)

(precious metals)– RPM Innovations (US)– Shaanxi Hengtong (China)

– Sisma Spa (Italy)– Trumpf (Germany)– Wuhan Binhu/Huake

(China)– Xi’an Bright Laser

Technologies (China)

Price: $160K to $5.0 million

63

Powder Bed Fusion Laser Melting

– Lasers: 400 w to 1 kW– Materials: aluminum, copper, nickel, and titanium

alloys, carbides, SS, tool steels– Post Processing: Heat treating, finishing– Structural finished parts– Complex geometries– Finer finish than EBM

64

Powder Bed Fusion Electron Beam Melting (EBM)

– Arcam (Sweden)– same as LM,

but with electron beam– BV: 14” x 14” x 15”– Laser: 3 kW

65

Powder Bed Fusion Electron Beam Melting (EBM)

– Materials: Titanium (supported by Arcam)– Faster than laser– Less residual stress than LM– Applns:

structural finished parts, complex geometries– aerospace parts, orthopedic implants

less refined than LM

66

Hybrids Matsuura (Japan)

– Powder Bed Fusion – CNC Mill

Mills every ten layers– 400W ytterbium fiber laser– $1 million

OPM Laboratory (Japan) PBF + CNC mill

67

Powder Bed Fusion Sintratec

– Switzerland– Nylon– €5K

68

Powder Bed Fusion

20:1

25%

69

Powder Bed Fusion rtt

70

Powder Bed Fusion

72

Powder Bed Fusion

73

Powder Bed Fusion

http://www.flyingmachine.com.au/studio/

74

Powder Bed Fusion

http://www.flyingmachine.com.au/studio/

75

Powder Bed Fusion

http://www.flyingmachine.com.au/studio/

Sheet Lamination

77

Sheet Lamination Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM)

–MCor Technologies (Ireland) Full color models $36K to $47K

78

Sheet Lamination Ultrasonic Lamination (UL)

–Fabrisonic Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing (UAM) 72” x 72” x 36” Multi-axis machining Embedded sensors Joining dissimilar

materials

Vat Photopolymerization

80

Vat Photopolymerization

1980s

81

Vat Photopolymerization

82

Vat Photopolymerization Digital Light Processing (DLP)

Envisiontec (Germany) DWS, Lithoz (Ceramic-filled polymer),

Asiga, Rapid Shape Formlabs, Autodesk EMBER, B9,

DWS XFab

Stereolithography (SLA) 3D Systems Lawrence Livermore

– Micro-stereolithography» Ultra-stiff, lightweight parts

83

VPP for $86K

84

Vat Photopolymerization

Smooth-finish parts, jewelry molds, prototypes

$5K to $600K

Pauline/3D Varius

Game Changers Among Game Changers

86

BAAM

ORNLLocal MotorsCincinnati Inc.

87

BAAM

ORNLUTenn

88

Voxel8

89

CBAM Process Overview

Load CAD slices into

printer and print bitmap of layer on fiber sheet

Remove dry

polymer powder

Feed fiber sheet into

inkjet printer

Stack sheets, heat, and

compress stack to final part

height

Remove un-bonded portions of fiber sheets to net final part

Deposit polymer powder

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

90

Impossible Objects CBAM

– Functional parts– ≤10x faster/stronger– Strength to weight

91

Carbon Continuous Liquid Interface Production (CLIP)

92

Figure 4 Platform

93

94

High Speed Sintering/FACTUM

95

High Speed Sintering/FACTUM

96

s

97

Who Else Wants In? New resin-based lamination process

– Fast– Precise

Rapid– Prototyping– Manufacturing

98

Who Else Wants In?

November 2015:

PBF (polymers)$50-$150K ???

Patent Landscape

100

Patent Landscape USA 60%

101

Patent Landscape Top issuing: USA 60%

– 2002 to 2014: 12,000

102

Patent Landscape Top issuing: USA 60%

– 2002 to 2014: 12,000

– Pending: ~4000– Issued: ~8000

103

Patent Landscape Top issuing: USA 60%

Expiring: – 2003 to 2014: (225)– 2013 to 2014: ~16

104

Patent Landscape

Patents

Applns

105

Patents Issued 1991 to Early 2014

3D Systems

Univ. of Texas

Electro Optical Systems

Objet

Nanotek

MakerBot

BPM Technology

United Technologies

Z Corporation

Panasonic

VoxelJet

0 50 100 150 200 250201

101616

5785

2519

1324

852

81314

2615

408

2166

# of Patents

# of Patents

The Players

107

3D Systems, DTM, & Z Corp US DDD 2001: acquired DTM Corporation 2012: acquired Z Corporation BJ, ME, MJ, PBF, VPP

108

Stratasys/Objet Israel (US) SSYS 2012:Merged with Objet 2013:Acquired Makerbot ME, MJ

109

Stratasys & MakerBot Consumer/prosumer/RP printers Lower cost machines (~$2000) 2013: acquired by Stratasys in $403M stock deal

110

Arcam Sweden AMAVF PBF (Electron Beam)

– Focus: orthopedic implants and aerospace

111

Concept Laser Germany PBF

– Laser CUSING

112

Electro Optical Systems Germany PBF

113

EnvisionTEC Germany VPP

jewelry, hearing aid, dental, consumer, auto manufacturing, and design

114

ExOne US XONE Binder Jet

115

HP US HPQ Game changer among game changers Multi Jet fusion

116

Optomec US DED, MJ

LENS Aerosol Jet

2.5D/parts/repair

117

Voxeljet Germany VJET Binder Jet Big printers

118

Companies

“Game changing technology” Acquired Morris Technologies

119

Companies

“Game changing technology” Acquired Morris Technologies

120

Companies

“Game changing technology” Acquired Morris Technologies

Silverbrook Technologies (Australia)– ≥ 40 patents (BPM)

121

Colleges and Universities USC: ≥ 26 patents (5)

122

Colleges and Universities USC: ≥ 26 patents (5)

MIT: ≥ 21 (31)

123

Colleges and Universities USC: ≥ 26 patents (5)

MIT: ≥ 21 (31)

UTA/UTEP: ≥ 8 (7)

Who Else Wants In?

125

Who Else Wants In?

Epson: 5 years

–“We want our machines to make anything”

126

Who Else Wants In?

Epson: 5 years

–“We want our machines to make anything”

Others ????

127

Who Else Wants In?

128

Who Else Wants In?

129

Who Else Wants In? yuu

130

Who Else Wants In?

Embedded ID

Selective curing VPP

Free-moving buildplate

131

QUESTIONS??

john.hornick@finnegan.com

132

Thank you for your time!john.hornick@finnegan.com

www.finnegan.com

FOLLOW MY TWEETS: @ JHornick3D1Stop

133

DisclaimerThese materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute to the understanding of U.S. intellectual property law. These materials reflect only the personal views of the authors and are not a source of legal advice. It is understood that each case is fact specific, and that the appropriate solution in any case will vary. Therefore, these materials may or may not be relevant to any particular situation. Thus, the authors and Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP cannot be bound either philosophically or as representatives of their various present and future clients to the comments expressed in these materials. The presentation of these materials does not establish any form of attorney-client relationship with the authors or Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. While every attempt was made to ensure that these materials are accurate, errors or omissions may be contained therein, for which any liability is disclaimed.