WCED WC Principal Symposium

Post on 27-May-2015

351 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of WCED WC Principal Symposium

1

Presenter: Dr Muavia Gallie (PhD)

Education Moving Up Cc. muavia@mweb.co.za

Turn-Around Consortium (TAC)

WCED West Coast Education District�Principal Symposium – 10 September 2011 �

�-  Quality Education and Quality Jobs/Salaries - �

Is education all about the Children, or about the Adults?�

Content 1.  Awareness: We don’t know what we don’t

know – State of Education in SA (4-21); 2.  Who is benefit from the Education budget?

(22-30); 3.  Should Quality Education be our focus?

(31-32); 4.  Conclusion (33-35).

www.slideshare.net Search “WCED WC Principal Symposium”

2

Introduction •  This presentation is not personal, but it is about

PEOPLE; •  Since what is going wrong in the education system,

has nothing to do with money, but it is about the PEOPLE;

•  What I present is not based on opinion, but rather data (information);

•  This conversation is certainly not about ‘being politically correct, but rather the ‘uncomfortable conversations’ we tend to avoid!;

•  Finally, I don’t defend constituencies (learners, teachers, department, etc.), but rather Education!

Awareness Test

3

TIMSS Participation Countries 2007

TIMSS Participation 1995 - 2007

4

TIMSS 2003 - Applying Maths

SACMEQ Countries

Botswana

Kenya Lesotho Malawi

Mauritius Mozambique

Namibia Seychelles

South Africa Swaziland Tanzania

Uganda Zambia

Zanzibar Zimbabwe

Source: SACMEQ Data, 2007

Pupil reading sco r e s

5

SACMEQ Results 6 2 12 15 4 7 13 1 9 5 3 10 14 11 8

6 5 13 15 3 12 9 2 10 4 1 11 14 7 8

7 2 11 13 1 4 14 3 9 6 5 8 12 10 15

6 2 12 14 1 11 13 4 8 5 3 9 15 10 7

MLA (Unesco/Unicef Education for All Campaign

Grade 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 3 2 9 4 5 6 12 7 11 10 8

2 6 5 8 4 3 7 1 11 12 9 10

6

1999-2010 + Ave Comparing Grades 1-12 from 1999 to 2010

450,000500,000550,000600,000650,000700,000750,000800,000850,000900,000950,0001,000,0001,050,0001,100,0001,150,0001,200,0001,250,0001,300,0001,350,000

Gra

de 1

Gra

de 2

Gra

de 3

Gra

de 4

Gra

de 5

Gra

de 6

Gra

de 7

Gra

de 8

Gra

de 9

Gra

de 1

0

Gra

de 1

1

Gra

de 1

2

199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010Ave.

Musical Chairs Game

7

Musical Chairs Game 24 1

23 2

22 3

21 4

20 5

19 6

18 7

17 8

16 9

15 10

14 11

13 12

12 13

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

Gr1 Gr2 Gr3 Gr4 Gr5 Gr6 Gr7 Gr8 Gr9 Gr10 Gr11 Gr12

8

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Gr 3 Literacy Gr 3 Numeracy Gr 6 Languages Gr 6 Mathematics

Aver

age

Perc

enta

ge

Average % scores after re-marking

Eastern Cape

Free State

Gauteng

KwaZulu Natal

Limpopo

Mpumalanga

Norther Cape

North West

Western Cape

South Africa

9

Matrics 2010 started Gr1 in 1999 Drop in Learners Gr 1 (1999) - Gr12 (2010)

1,318,932

579,384550,000600,000650,000700,000750,000800,000850,000900,000950,000

1,000,0001,050,0001,100,0001,150,0001,200,0001,250,0001,300,0001,350,000

Grade 1 Grade 12

Only 44% retained!

Success rate = 8,1%

• Success-rate of the system = 8,1% • Of every 12 learners starting Grade One, only 1 learner attains what the system is promising them - data 2005!

10

Access vs Success

Whether you Pass! How you Pass!

Short-Listing

Employment Quantity

Quality

% Different Types of schools in SA

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20%

Anti-Functional

Dysfunctional Under-Performing

High-Performing

Qua

ntity

of P

ass

Quality of Pass (Grades)

20% 50%

20% 10%

11

Japp

So, if we spend all this money (2011/12 = R178b; 2012/13 = R190b; 2013/14

= R218b) on education, why are the children not

benefiting? Who is actually benefiting?

12

LES: 2001 - 2005

LES: 2006 - 2009

13

11400000

11600000

11800000

12000000

12200000

12400000

12600000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Learners 2001 - 2010

320000

340000

360000

380000

400000

420000

440000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Educators 2001 - 2010

14

24500

25000

25500

26000

26500

27000

27500

28000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Schools 2001 - 2010

At Circuit, Districts, Provincial and National

•  Added Circuits and Districts; •  More Centres, Units, Committees,

Task Teams, etc.; •  More consultants actually doing the

work that was initially defined as part of people’s job descriptions;

•  More Directors, Chief Directors, DDGs, and DGs, with plenty of PAs.

15

Four Layers of Expertise C

ondi

tions

of

Serv

ice

Man

agin

g Te

achi

ng a

nd

Lear

ning

Supp

ort a

nd

Dev

elop

men

t

Syst

ems

Thin

king

Teac

her

Uni

ons

Scho

ol

Lead

ers

Circ

uit a

nd

Dis

tric

t

Prov

inci

al,

Nat

iona

l, M

inis

teria

l CDE – 7 September 2011

16

31

Quality Education Conference - 2002

Three Steps to Quality Education

Dys-functional Schools

Step 1

Under-performing

Schools

Step 2

High Functioning

Schools

Step 3

Excellent Schools

Basic Right To Education

Basic Education Quality Education

Legal and Human Rights Obligations

Professional, Social, and Ethical Obligations

17

Some Untruths in Education 1.  Democratic decision making in the education system creates a

conducive tone and culture; 2.  Parent involvement is crucial; 3.  Resources (computers and libraries) will make all the difference; 4.  The department is not supporting teachers and therefore they are

demotivated; 5.  Lack of learning is caused by the ill-discipline of learners; 6.  Our classrooms are overcrowded – small classes will make the

difference; 7.  It is difficult to achieve learner success in poverty stricken

communities; 8.  Learners are not at the level they should be when they get to our

school/class; 9.  Teacher development will solve most of our performance

problems; 10.  It is the unions!

Current Conversations … •  We are making progress …; We are getting

better …; We are getting things under control …; It is the union! (Education Officials);

•  My principal is on his way from a meeting … (always between district and school) (Principals of Schools);

•  Always blaming the department, the principal, parents, children, resources, etc. (Teachers);

18

Final Points: •  Appoint people who can do the job, not people who

belong to a group; because they are connected; etc.;

•  As a principal – if you don’t care about every learner in your school as much as you care about your own child, then you are in the wrong job …;

•  As an official, if you don’t know, can’t do (display), or is not better than those whom you need to manage, guide, etc., they will never TRUST what you say;

•  In a functional system, you can get away with people managing “generally”, but in a dysfunctional system, you have to have the specific (technical) capacity and skills!

Thank You!!