Warm up !!!!! · Riyadh,Saudi Arabia Febuary 5th, 2013 Software Defined Networking The Future of...

Post on 05-May-2018

219 views 5 download

Transcript of Warm up !!!!! · Riyadh,Saudi Arabia Febuary 5th, 2013 Software Defined Networking The Future of...

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 1

Warm up !!!!!

Control Plane

Data Plane

Abstraction: Process by which concepts are derived by reducing the information content of a concept …

Riyadh,Saudi Arabia Febuary 5th , 2013

Software Defined Networking

The Future of Networks & Protocols

Zubair Khan Solutions Architect

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 3

“…In the SDN architecture, the control and data planes are decoupled, network intelligence and state are logically centralized, and the underlying network infrastructure is abstracted from the applications…”

3

https://www.opennetworking.org/images/stories/downloads/white-papers/wp-sdn-newnorm.pdf

“…open standard that enables researchers to run experimental protocols in campus networks. Provides standard hook for researchers to run experiments, without exposing internal working of vendor devices……”

http://www.openflow.org/wp/learnmore/

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 4

“Will OpenFlow commoditize networks? Impact Cisco margins?” —Several media publications, Bloggers

“Google revamps networks with OpenFlow” —ZDnet Headlines

“Hype around SDN/OpenFlow getting way out of Control. Where have I seen this before…” —Ethereal mind, Blogger

“.We share a more pragmatic view, noting Cisco (for example) is likely to view SDN as a TAM expansion opportunity…” —Deutsche Bank Research note, Wired, April 2012

“SDN needs a bigger definition” —Lippis report, 2012

“Prediction: OpenFlow Is Dead by 2014; SDN Reborn in Network Management” —Mike Fratto, Network Computing

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 5

“A platform for developing new control planes”

“An open solution for VM mobility in the Data-Center”

“An open solution for customized flow forwarding control in the Data-Center”

“A means to do traffic engineering without MPLS”

“A way to scale my firewalls and load

balancers”

“A solution to build a very large scale layer-2 network”

“A way to build my own security/encryption solution, avoiding RSA”

“A way to reduce the CAPEX of my network

and leverage commodity switches”

“A way to define virtual networks with specific topologies for my multi-tenant

Data-Center”

“A means to scale my fixed/mobile gateways and

optimize their placement”

“A solution to build virtual topologies with optimum

multicast forwarding behavior”

“A way to optimize link utilization in my network, through new multi-path algorithms”

“A way to avoid lock-in to a single networking vendor”

“A way to distribute policy/intent, e.g. for DDoS prevention, in the network”

“A way to configure my entire network as a whole rather than individual

devices” “A solution to get a global view of the

network – topology and state”

“Develop solutions software speeds: I don’t want to work with my network vendor or go through

lengthy standardization.”

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 6

Edge

Core Mobile

CPE

Appliance

Service

Service Service

Service

Towards Programmatic Interfaces to the Network Approaching Today’s Application Developer Dilemma

6

§  Many Network Applications today: •  OTT – for speed and agility

•  Avoid network interaction – complex and slow innovation

§  New Model for Network Applications •  Keep speed and agility •  Full-duplex interaction with

the network across multiple planes – extract, control, leverage network state

A New Programming Paradigm is Needed

CLI(s)

“Fast” App App

“Slo

w” “N

ew”

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 7

Open Network Environment for SDN

•  Enable modularization and componentization of network control- and data-plane functions, with associated open interfaces. This allows for optimized placement of these components (network devices, dedicated servers, application servers) and close interlock between applications and network functions.

•  Anticipated benefits include: Closely align the control plane with the needs of applications, enable a clear control-/data-plane split, improve performance and robustness, enhance manageability, operations and consistency

Implementation Perspective: Evolve the Control-Plane Architecture Traditional Control Plane

Architecture Control Plane Architecture with SDN (Examples)

Control-plane component(s) Data-plane component(s) Application Component(s)

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 8

Open Network Environment – Approaching a Definition

Server Server

Physical

Physical

virtual

virtual virtual

virtual

virtual

Resource Orchestration and Analytics “Network Middleware”

Integrated Physical and Virtual Infrastructure

API

API

API

API API API

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 9

a

Cisco Open Network Environment Industry’s Most Comprehensive Networking Portfolio

Hardware + Software Physical + Virtual Network + Compute

Network

Platform APIs

Controllers and Agents

Virtual Overlays

Applications

www.cisco.com/go/one

API /One PK

SDN: SW Controller Open Flow

Virtualization

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 10

Open Network Environment Qualities Programmatic APIs

Programmatic APIs

Resource Orchestration-

Controllers

Network Infrastructure Virtualization

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 11

The Need for Abstractions

•  Data-plane Abstractions – ISO/OSI Layering •  Examples

•  Local best effort delivery (e.g., Ethernet) •  Global best effort delivery (e.g., IP) •  Reliable byte-stream (e.g., TCP)

•  Data plane abstractions are key to Internet’s success

•  Abstractions for the other planes (control, services, management, orchestration,..) … are missing

•  Consequences include: •  Notorious difficulty of e.g. network management solutions •  Difficulty of evolving software for these planes

Abstractions in Networking

“Modularity based on abstraction is the way

things get done”

Barbara Liskov Turing Award Winner

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 12

APIs make Abstractions available to Programmers Example: Cisco’s onePK (one Programming Kit) – Get your build on!

Any Cisco Router or

Switch

Applications That YOU

Create

onePK

Flexible development environment to: •  Innovate

•  Extend

•  Automate

•  Customize

•  Enhance

•  Modify

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 13

onePK Architecture

C, JAVA Program

onePK API Presentation

onePK API Infrastructure

IOS / XE (Catalyst, ISR, ASR1K)

NXOS (Nexus Platforms)

IOS XR (ASR 9K, CRS)

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 14

Container

Network OS

onePK Apps

Process Hosting

Container

onePK Apps

Network OS

Bla

de

Blade Hosting

onePK Apps E

xter

nal

Ser

ver

Network OS

End-Point Hosting

Write Once, Run Anywhere

onePK Application Hosting Options

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 15

Not all Networking APIs are created the same

•  Classify Networking APIs based on their scope •  API Scopes:

Location independent; Area; Particular place; Specific device

•  Alternate approaches like device/network/service APIs difficult to associate with use cases

•  Location where an API is hosted can differ from the scope of the API

•  Different network planes could implement different flavors of APIs, based on associated abstractions

Classes of Networking APIs following their Scope

15

Utility

Area/Set

Place in the Network

Element

Example: Get Auth, Publish Log,.. Scope: Location independent

Example: Domain, OSPF-area,.. Scope: Group/Set/Area

Example: Edge Session, NAT Scope: Specific place/location

Example: interface statistics Scope: Specific element

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 16

Custom Routing Application

Data Center

Data Center

Path A

Path B

Policy

Unique Data Forwarding Algorithm Highly Optimized for the Network Operator’s Application

onePK

onePK

onePK API presentation layer

Example: Custom Routing Data Center Traffic Forwarding Based on a Custom Algorithm

Business Data

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 17

Custom Routing Initial Setup: Default routing using EIGRP

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 18

Custom Routing Routing for Dollars: Application driven routes installed in network

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 19

Custom Routing Tracing the application installed route – using the developer and element services

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 20

One PK and Agent Framework ( Open Flow,IRS ontop of One PK)

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. BRKRST-2051 Cisco Public

onePK and Agent Framework Enabling specific solutions/protocols (OpenFlow, IRS,…) on top of onePK

IOS / XE NX-OS IOS-XR

onePK APIs Presentation

onePK API Infrastructure

Agent Framework

Agent Implementation (e.g. OpenFlow)

Application Framework / Controller Agent Communication

Component

Solu?on"defined"protocol"(e.g."OpenFlow)"

Cisco"Confiden?al"

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 21

Open Network Environment Qualities Agents and Controllers: Logically centralized and fully distributed Control

Programmatic APIs

Resource Orchestration -

Controllers

Network Infrastructure Virtualization

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 22

Orchestration: Agents and Controllers Consolidate State Across Multiple Network Elements •  Some network delivered functionality benefits from

logically centralized coordination across multiple network devices •  Functionality typically domain, task, or customer specific •  Typically multiple Controller-Agent

pairs are combined for a network solution •  Controller

•  Process on a device, interacting with a set of devices using a set of APIs or protocols

•  Offer a control interface/API •  Agent

•  Process or library on a device, leverages device APIs to deliver a task/domain specific function

•  Controller-Agent Pairs offer APIs which integrate into the overall Network API suite

Controller  Agent  APIs  

Agent  APIs  

Agent  APIs  

Agent  APIs  

APIs  

Analyze

Act

Observe Notify

Gather

Controller  

Agent  

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 23

“Subsidiarity is an organizing principle that matters ought to be handled by the smallest, lowest or least centralized competent authority.”

23

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidiarity

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 24

Deployment Considerations – Applying Subsidiarity to Networking •  Control loop requirements differ per function/

service and deployment domain •  “As loose as possible, as tight as needed” •  Latency, Scalability, Robustness, Consistency,

Availability •  Different requirements per use case

•  Example: Topology for Visualization (Network Management) vs. Topology for Path-Computation/Routing

•  How to decide which functionality is well suited a particular control paradigm?

Exploring the tradeoff between Agents and Controllers – and fully distributed Control

24

Fully distributed

Logically centralized (using Controller-Agent pairs)

Data-Plane

Control-Plane

Services-Plane

Note: Example only – Not all network planes shown

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 25

Orchestration: Controllers and Agents Task Specific Solutions and Generic Controller Infrastructure

•  Networking already leverages a great breath of Agents and Controllers •  Current Agent-Controller pairs always serve a specific task (or set of tasks) in a specific domain

•  System Design: Trade-off between Agent-Controller and Fully Distributed Control •  Control loop requirements differ per function/service and deployment domain •  “As loose as possible, as tight as needed” •  Latency, Scalability, Robustness, Consistency, Availability

Session Border Control

Wireless LAN Control

Path Computation

SIP-proxy/ SBC WLC

AP AP AP PCC PCC PCC

PCE

H.248 CAPWAP PCEP

Generic Controller Infrastructure

SBC B2BUA

SBC B2BUA

SBC B2BUA onePK

OF-Agent OF-Agent OF-Agent onePK onePK

App App App Control Programs leveraging the ONE Controller

ONE Controller

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 26

Open Network Environment Qualities Network Infrastructure Virtualization

Programmatic APIs

Agents and Controllers

Network Virtual Overlays

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 27

Network Abstractions support Virtualization Blurring the lines between physical and virtual entities – networks and services

•  Virtual Overlay Networks •  custom endpoint addressing

(e.g. for simple endpoint mobility) •  custom topologies/segmentation •  custom service chains

•  Example: vPATH

•  Virtual Service Appliances/Gateways •  VSG, vWAAS

“In computing, virtualization is the creation of a virtual (rather than actual) version of something, such as a hardware platform, operating system, storage device, or network resources.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtualization

Common Abstractions and common APIs across physical and virtual network elements

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 28

Physical | Virtual | Cloud Journey

PHYSICAL WORKLOAD

VIRTUAL WORKLOAD

CLOUD WORKLOAD

•  One app per Server •  Static •  Manual provisioning

•  Many apps per Server •  Mobile •  Dynamic provisioning

•  Multi-tenant per Server •  Elastic •  Automated Scaling

HYPERVISOR VDC-1 VDC-2

CONSISTENCY: Policy, Features, Security, Management, Separation of Duties

Nexus 1000V, VM-FEX

vWAAS, VSG, ASA 1000V, vNAM**

UCS for Virtualized Workloads

Nexus 7K/5K/3K/2K

WAAS, ASA, NAM

UCS for Bare Metal

Cloud Services Router (CSR 1000V) ASR, ISR

Switching

Routing

Services

Compute

** 1H 2013

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 29

Virtual Overlay Networks Example: Virtual Overlay Networks and Services with Nexus 1000V •  Large scale L2 domains:

Tens of thousands of virtual ports •  Common APIs

•  Incl. OpenStack Quantum API’s for orchestration

•  Scalable DC segmentation and addressing •  VXLAN

•  Virtual service appliances and service chaining/traffic steering •  VSG (cloud-ready security),

vWAAS (application acceleration), vPATH •  Multi-hypervisor platform support: ESX, Hyper-V, OpenSource Hypervisors •  Physical and Virtual: VXLAN to VLAN Gateway

Nexus 1000V

OpenStack Quantum API REST API

Any Hypervisor

Tenant 1

Virtual Services vWAAS

VSG ASA 1KV

Tenant 3

ASA 55xx

Physical Workloads

Physical (VLAN) Network

VXLAN Gateway

Virtual Workloads

Tenant 2

© 2012 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Connect 30

Open Network Environment – Summary

•  Evolutionary step for networking – evolve the Network Control Plane where needed •  Approach centered around delivering open, programmable environment for

real-world use cases •  No one-size-fits-all •  Cisco will support Network Virtualization, APIs and Agents/Controllers •  Joint learning with industry and academia

•  Technology-agnostic •  Not predicated on a particular technology or standard •  Draw from Cisco technologies and industry standards

•  Delivered as incremental functionality •  Many customers will use hybrid implementations •  Build upon existing infrastructure with investment protection

Cisco’s approach

30

For More information Open Network Environment www.cisco.com/go/one One PK www.cisco.com/go/onepk www.cisco.com/go/getyourbuildon

Thank you.