Post on 18-Nov-2014
description
Voices of the Least Developed Countries
of Asia and the Pacific
Achieving the Millennium Development Goals Through a Global Partnership
LONDON, Asia 2015, March 6-7, 2006
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Overview Asia-Pacific – the fastest-developing part of the world
With the world’s two most populous and fastest-growing countries, China and India And the “tiger” economies of East and South-East Asia
No country is expected to ACHIEVE ALL the MDGs – concern
No country expected to FAIL ON ALL MDGs - potential
But Asia-Pacific is a region with extreme contrasts - highly heterogeneous With some of the most economically disadvantaged countries: 14 (of 50) Least Developed
Countries inhabited by nearly 40% of worldwide LDC population
The “tyranny of averages” hides extreme poverty in Asia-Pacific LDCs
Structural and geographic impediments result in persistence of poverty in its many dimensions; conflict aggravates problems
A global partnership through ODA, debt relief and trade is necessary to accelerate development in these countries A three-pronged argument beyond the fundamental moral basis: strategic, commercial and
efficiency
Progress in Asia-Pacific LDCs benefits the world - a ‘win-win’ for all
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Who are the LDCs? Criteria for identification
Low income level Low stock of human assets (nutrition, health, education) Economic vulnerability (X concentration, unstable X earnings,
unstable agri, low share of manuf & services, small population)
LDCs face severe handicaps Disadvantaged location Small domestic markets Limited infrastructure Low domestic resources – savings for investment Conflict in some Environmental hazards
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Location & population of LDCs In 2003, the UN listed 50 Least Developed Countries
28% (14 LDCs) in Asia-Pacific account for almost 40% of worldwide LDC population - disproportionately high population share
72% (36 LDCs) in other regions account for 60% of worldwide LDC population
34
14
2
Africa
Asia-Pacific
Others
440
30260Africa
Asia-Pacific
Others
Number of LDCs Population (million)
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Key indicators of LDCs in Asia-Pacific and other regions
Weighted averages (2003)
GDP per- capita US$
Aid per-capita
Exports of goods and services as % of GDP
HDI value
Asia-Pacific LDCs (Asian developing countries)
513
(2130)
19 21% 0.52
Other LDCs 310 43 26% 0.39
Geographic status Asia-Pacific LDCs
7 Small Island Developing States (SIDS)
Kiribati, Maldives, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Timor-Leste, Tuvalu, Vanuatu
4 Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
Afghanistan, Bhutan, Lao PDR, Nepal
3 Coastal LDCs Bangladesh, Cambodia, Myanmar
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Proportion of Population Below US$1 (PPP) Per Day
Heterogeneity of Asia-Pacific
2130
513310
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
Asiandevelopingcountries
Asia-PacificLDCs
Other LDCs
The Asia-Pacific LDC population accounts for 7% of the total population in the Asia-Pacific region. However, as much as 12% the region’s extreme poor (or 90 million) live in these LDCs.
Per-Capita GDP, 2003
22%
38%44%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Asiandevelopingcountries
Asia-PacificLDCs
Other LDCs
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Current trend Vs MDG target in Asia-Pacific LDCs
Proportion of population below the national poverty lines in Asia-Pacific LDCs
46.8
37.9
55.0
27.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1990 2000 2015
Year
Per
cen
t
Current trendMDG target
About 35.1 million more people will live below the national poverty line under the current trend
Even if MDG target is attained, about 92.5 million people will still live below the national poverty line
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Some successes, but MDGs are far from attained…
Despite handicaps, Asia-Pacific LDCs have made progress in achieving some MDG targets such as: Net enrolment ratio Under-five mortality rate Proportion of the population with sustainable access to improved
water sources and sanitation But are far from achieving other MDG targets such as:
Poverty reduction Minimum dietary needs - malnutrition Literacy rate Infant mortality rate
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Resource gap in Asia-Pacific LDCs
A key structural impediment is the low savings rate in LDCs: Most of the income of the poor has to be spent on essential consumption (food, clothing and shelter)
Low savings lead to low investments and slow capital formation, resulting in slower economic growth (“classic poverty trap”)
-32
-5
-21-12-8
-15
0
-77
-4 -2 16
21
1 0-8
8
-7
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30A
fgh
an
ista
n
Ba
ng
lad
es
h
Bh
uta
n
Ca
mb
od
ia
La
o P
DR
Ne
pa
l
My
an
ma
r
Tim
or-
Le
ste
Va
nu
atu
Ch
ina
Ind
ia
Ind
on
es
ia
Ma
lay
sia
Pa
kis
tan
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Sri
La
nk
a
Th
aila
nd
Vie
t N
am
Resource gap (% of GDP) = Gross domestic savings - investment
% of GDP (2003)
Asian developing countriesAsia-Pacific LDCs
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Resource Gap Per-Capita
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000A
fgh
an
ista
n
Ban
gla
desh
Bh
uta
n
Cam
bo
dia
Lao
PD
R
Nep
al
Myan
mar
Tim
or-
Leste
Van
uatu
Ch
ina
Ind
ia
Ind
on
esia
Mala
ysia
Pakis
tan
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Sri
Lan
ka
Th
ailan
d
Vie
t N
am
Resource gap (% of GDP) = Gross domestic savings - investment
US$
Asia-Pacific LDCs Asian developing countries
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Addressing MDG impediments Asia-Pacific LDCs are trying to achieve the MDGs with very little resources
Landlocked and small island LDCs face additional geographic challenges (distance from markets,
proneness to natural disasters, etc.)
Conflict in some LDCs is also an impediment – diverts scarce public resources & inhibits private flows
MDG 8 advocates global partnership through a combination of three strategies:
1. Increased and more effective aid in the short run, with a phase-out plan
2. Debt relief to severely indebted poor countries
3. Increased market access and aid-for-trade consistent with poverty reduction (will also help in tapering off aid)
From the LDCs a clear recognition of governance issues – addressing corruption upfront
Complementary support from partner countries within and outside the Asia-Pacific region could
make an enormous difference
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Increasing Aid to Achieve the MDGs
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Other LDCs
Asia-Pacific LDCs1990 2002
US$
Average Aid Per-Capita, 1990-2002
Average aid per-capita has consistently been lower in Asia-Pacific LDCs, compared to LDCs of other regions.
In 2003, aid per-capita was US$19 for Asia-Pacific LDCs, compared to US$43 in other regions.
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
In 2003, import duties on apparel exported from Bangladesh, Cambodia and Nepal to the US amounted to US$520 million, more than 3 times the net disbursed bilateral aid of US$150 million received by those countries.
Disbursed Aid Versus Collected Duties by USA
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Bangladesh Cambodia Nepal
Mill
ion
US
$
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Per
cen
t
Duty Paid (Mln US$)
Aid Disbursed by USA (Mln US$)
Duty Paid as % of Aid
Aid vs. Trade: making aid work for trading out of poverty
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Estimated MDG financing gap in the 14 LDCs – 12 to 26 billion, 2006 to 2015
(based on UN Millennium Project estimates for Bangladesh and Cambodia)
Projected for 2006 Projected for 2010 Projected for 2015
Total (US$ billion)
Per-capita (US$)
Total (US$ billion)
Per-capita (US$)
Total (US$ billion)
Per-capita (US$)
Total MDG investment needs
20.7 76 31.0 104 47.3 145
Sources of financing
Household contributions
Government expenditures
Total
2.3
6.4
8.7
8
24
32
3.2
10.1
13.3
11
34
45
4.8
16.3
21.1
15
50
65
MDG financing gap
12.0 44 17.7 59 26.2 80
ODA for direct MDG support (2002)
1.9 7 2.0 7 2.2 7
Shortfall in ODA for direct MDG support
over 2002 level10.1 37 15.7 52 24.0 73
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
The additional ODA required to bridge the resource gap of Asia-Pacific
LDCs is not an unreachable sum
An estimate by the Millennium Project shows the cost of meeting the
MDGs in all LDCs will correspond to 0.12% of the GNP of OECD-DAC
countries in 2006
Roughly double the current share of ODA in donor GNP to these countries
(0.06% in 2002)
Still well below the 0.15% to 0.20% target as called for in the Brussels
Programme of Action for the Least Developed Countries
Effective utilisation of aid: Asia-Pacific LDCs recognise the importance of
addressing the “leaky bucket syndrome” through improved governance
and institution-building
ODA: increase, coordination, and effectiveness
A small amount of support from more developed partners would make
a huge difference to Asia-Pacific LDCs.
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Recommendations on Aid for the MDGs(endorsed by the UN Special Body on LDCs and LLDCs in Bangkok, May 2005)
Actions by LDCs at the national level Good governance at all levels is a prerequisite for effective use of aid Better aid harmonisation and coordination – and a country-based approach that channels aid to
sectors where its impact is greatest Assessment of outcomes more important than assessment of available inputs – need to
strengthen domestic capacities for planning and project implementation, improve monitoring and evaluation, ensure better institutional coordination, and greater decentralisation of project implementation
Actions at the international level Aid should be front-loaded, primarily in the form of grants, not in the form of tied purchases -
meeting the targets in the Brussels Programme of Action, the Almaty Programme of Action and the Mauritius Strategy
Improving coherence among donors in areas such as policy conditionalities, trade regimes and technology transfer from donor countries – policy conditionalities should converge with recipient country priorities, thus promoting national ownership
Programme budget support as the main long-term strategy to assist LDCs – to indicate long-term donor commitment and to finance recurring costs, not only initial investments
Implement regional solutions to enable small economies to address costly issues by introducing economies of scale
Responding to the changing priority needs and concerns of Asia-Pacific LDCs over the years
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Debt Relief in Support of the MDGsWeighted averages,
2002
Outstanding debt per-capita Debt relief per-capita
US$ Ratio US$ Ratio
Asia-Pacific LDCs
150 1.0 0.16 1.0
Other LDCs 255 1.7 1.64 10.3
Selected Asia-Pacific LDCs, 2002
Debt-to-GDP ratio Per-capita outstanding debt
Lao PDR 146% US$471
Vanuatu 71% US$785
Maldives 41% US$830
The debt burden and debt-servicing liability of Asia-Pacific LDCs have received little attention, compared to other LDCs. However, debt-to-GDP ratios and per-capita outstanding debt stand at high levels in some LDCs.
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Debt Relief for Additional Resources
Severely indebted (4) Bhutan, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Samoa
Moderately indebted (2) Cambodia, Solomon Islands
Less indebted (4) Bangladesh, Maldives, Nepal, Vanuatu
Not classified (4) Afghanistan, Kiribati, Timor-Leste, Tuvalu
•Since the introduction of the initiative for Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) in 1995, 27 countries have benefited (US$ 70 billion)•No Asia-Pacific LDC has benefited from the HIPC initiative
•HIPC eligibility thresholds remain very high•Asia-Pacific LDCs have relatively good debt repayment records, relatively low debt-servicing ratios – reflecting their relatively prudent economic management
•In view of the pressing need to release additional resources to meet the MDGs in Asia-Pacific LDCs, it is imperative that this “better performance” not be penalized by exclusion from the HIPC Initiative.
All “severely indebted” and “moderately indebted” (as per World Bank classification, 2003) Asia-Pacific LDCs should be eligible for debt relief
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Recent developments on debt relief• Mid 2005: Gleneagles G8 finance ministers announced 100% cancellation of debt owed to multilateral agencies by 18 of the 38 HIPC countries
-14 in Africa, 4 in Latin America-None of the beneficiaries are LDCs from Asia-Pacific
• Jan 2006: Multilateral debt relief initiative of IMF for 100% debt cancellation for 19 countries plus 20 more on eligibility under HIPC
• Bold and commendable - will enable poor countries to use resources saved for health, education and addressing income poverty
• But Asia-Pacific LDCs remain off the radar-Only 2 LDCs from the region (Lao PDR and Myanmar) are
classified as “eligible” on the HIPC list
Urgent need to re-examine the issue of debt relief from the perspective of generating additional resources to attain the MDGs
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Recommendations on Debt Relief for MDGs (endorsed by the UN Special Body on LDCs and LLDCs in Bangkok, May 2005)
Any debt relief extended should be an add-on to ODA, not be at cost of ODA
Criteria for the selection of HIPC-eligible countries need to be reviewed, with particular attention to the unique challenges faced by the 4 “severely indebted” and 2 “moderately indebted” LDCs of Asia-Pacific
MDG-based needs assessments should prevail over arbitrary indicators such as debt-to-export ratios
Debt sustainability should be redefined as “the level of debt consistent with achieving the MDGs, reaching 2015 without a new debt overhang”
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Degree of Openness and Per Capita Exports in 2003 for Various Groups of LDCs
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
APLDCs APLL-LDCs APSI-LDCs Other LDCs All LDCs
Country Groups
Deg
ree
of
op
enn
ess
(su
m
of
exp
ort
s an
d im
po
rts
as
% o
f G
DP
)
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
160.0
180.0
200.0
Pe
r c
ap
ita
ex
po
rts
(c
urr
en
t U
S$
)
Degree of Openness in 2003 (per cent)
Per Capita Export, 2003 (Current US$)
Potential for trading out of poverty
Asia-Pacific LDCs have fairly open economies, most have embraced globalisation - potential for making trade work for development
6 are WTO members; 5 negotiating
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
STRUCTURE OF EARNINGS FROM GOODS EXPORTS AND REMITTANCE FLOWS IN ASIA-PACIFIC LDCs (% of foreign exchange earnings)
Country
Agricultural Products
(%)
Manufactured Items(%)
Other Merchandise
goods(%)
Total Merchandise
Exports(%)
Remittances(%)
Total Merchandise Exports +
Remittances (Million US$)
Afghanistan na na na 100 0 (100%) 135
Bangladesh 4.6 55.4 8.5 68.6 31.4 (100%) 10121.9
Bhutan 14.7 39.7 45.7 100 0 (100%) 116
Cambodia 0 88.2 5 93.1 6.9 (100%) 1815
Kiribati 88.9 0 11.1 100 0 (100%) 9
Lao PDR na na na 100 na (100%) 378
Maldives 67.3 31.9 0.9 100 na (100%) 113
Myanmar na na na 98 2 (100%) 2652.1
Nepal 8.1 51.7 28.1 87.8 12.2 (100%) 945.5
Samoa na na na 25.1 74.9 (100%) 59.7
Solomon Islands na na na 100 na (100%) 75
Vanuatu 54.1 5.4 10.8 70.3 29.7 (100%) 37
APLDCs (12) 7.7 59.4 10.0 81.9 18.1 (100%) 16427.2
Export structure reveals high contribution of labour-intensive exports, remittances and agriculture (for some) – trade-related support can lead to job creation and income generation for the poor
Earnings from remittances could be threatened by entry barriers to services markets in partner countries
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Trading Out of Poverty: Some Concerns Phasing-out of the Multi Fibre Arrangement (MFA) and rise of textile/apparel
exports from China: adverse consequences for Bangladesh, Nepal, Cambodia and Lao PDR – particularly women
Supply-side constraints: inadequate domestic capacities limit gains from new market access opportunities offered under Generalised Schemes of Preferences (GSP)
Limited South-South trade: the structure of protection of developing countries often weighs more heavily on exporters from the LDCs than on those from developed countries
Fall in world prices of major exports from Asia-Pacific LDCs, for example, apparel prices
Non Agricultural Market Access (NAMA) negotiations: expected to bring down tariffs on manufactured goods, leading to considerable erosion of preferences currently enjoyed by Asia-Pacific LDCs
WTO Hong Kong, Dec 2005: limited progress Duty & quota free access for 97% of LDC products; new pledges on Aid for Trade End agri export subsidies by 2013; but no progress on ending domestic support New WTO deadline of April 30 2006 to agree ‘modalities’ (frameworks) for NAMA, agri and
comprehensive draft schedules of commitments based on agreed modalities by 31 July 2006
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Recommendations on trade and market access(as endorsed by the UN Special Body on LDCs and LLDCs in Bangkok, May 2005)
Actions at the national level Mainstreaming trade into overall development plans Social impact assessments of trade liberalisation options
Actions at the international level Providing WTO-bound duty- and quota-free market access for all exports Enhancing market access under preferential schemes
A scheme similar to the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) could be extended to the LDCs of Asia-Pacific
More commercially meaningful commitments in terms of temporary movement of natural persons and cross-border supply of services such as outsourcing
Simplifying and streamlining WTO accession process – investing resources in ‘real’ priorities for LDCs
Increasing technical assistance for human resources development – negotiating capacity of trade negotiators, implementation capacity, etc.
Increasing funds allocated to improve productive capacity and other supply-side responses
Providing special and differential concessions to LDCs in regional and bilateral trade agreements
Addressing volatilities in the financial and monetary systems
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Case for a Regional Compact Emerging positive trends in more south-south
cooperation Examples – China, India, Korea, Japan, Malaysia,Thailand
- more so in times of disasters (e.g., tsunami, earthquake) Address cross border issues – migration, trafficking, drugs,
diseases, conflict, environmental hazards
More could be done to help close the ‘development gap’ - no country benefits by having a poor neighbour Preferential market access Trunk infrastructure Ease legal labour movements
Keep the promiseVoices of the Poor from the Asia-Pacific LDCsAchieving the Millennium Development Goals through Global Partnership
Key Messages Pro-poor growth in Asia-Pacific LDCs will raise standards of living of millions of people
contributing to peace, progress, and economic security all over the world – a “win-win
The moral argument is clear; in addition there is the Strategic argument: regional and global security will be enhanced
Commercial argument: dynamism of Asia-Pacific will permeate through the LDCs and markets for all partners will grow
Efficiency argument: LDCs have already demonstrated commendable progress towards achieving MDGs; with increased support, aid dependence will progressively decline
We appreciate the increased support to Africa; and call attention to the 120
million people from the poorest countries of Asia and the Pacific as well.
This is not a Utopian wish: it is realistic and possible in our generation